We done it how we want to! Dictating the terms of engagement for decision making over NRM.

26
We done it how we want to! Dictating the terms of engagement for decision making over NRM

Transcript of We done it how we want to! Dictating the terms of engagement for decision making over NRM.

Page 1: We done it how we want to! Dictating the terms of engagement for decision making over NRM.

We done it how we want to!Dictating the terms of engagement for

decision making over NRM

Page 2: We done it how we want to! Dictating the terms of engagement for decision making over NRM.
Page 3: We done it how we want to! Dictating the terms of engagement for decision making over NRM.

So much rhetoric!

Women are silent!

Without a voice!

In the shadow of decision making!

Weak!

Invisible

Marginalised!

Page 4: We done it how we want to! Dictating the terms of engagement for decision making over NRM.

Very much a personal journey!

Some turning points1.“how many grandmothers per hectare do

you need to know before making a soil fertility management decision?

2.“we chose a men to lead because it gives the impression we are serious”

Page 5: We done it how we want to! Dictating the terms of engagement for decision making over NRM.

Why focus on gender!

“There is women’s business just as men have men’s business, but it all comes together you know!”

Page 6: We done it how we want to! Dictating the terms of engagement for decision making over NRM.

Where and how does it come together!

• In the home• In the extended family• In the interest groups • In the community• in other levels too ----- its there for you to see!

“Women are the parliament we are the cabinet, the two work together, that is government you know”

Page 7: We done it how we want to! Dictating the terms of engagement for decision making over NRM.

Buzz words!

Gender mainstreaming!

•Inclusive democracy

•Empowerment

•Equity and social justice

Page 8: We done it how we want to! Dictating the terms of engagement for decision making over NRM.

Whose views prevail?

Culture

Local world views

External world views

Self determination

Page 9: We done it how we want to! Dictating the terms of engagement for decision making over NRM.

Re-engaging science!

Changing visions inspired by world experience

What/who informs development discourse?

Whose voice counts?

How do local women perceive themselves?

Page 10: We done it how we want to! Dictating the terms of engagement for decision making over NRM.

The gender struggle!

Decades of gender advocacy

• UN conferences on women (4)

• National action plans• Years of gender

targeted development

Page 11: We done it how we want to! Dictating the terms of engagement for decision making over NRM.

Beyond struggle!

1. Where are they?

2. How many speak?

3. When do they speak?

4. How do they speak?

5. What do they say when they do speak?

Page 12: We done it how we want to! Dictating the terms of engagement for decision making over NRM.

Too few by a long shot!

• Incredible, controversial, charismatic, powerful women of our times!

Mbuya Nehanda, Winnie Mandela

• Special attributes as wives, witches, mediums, mistresses and politicians

Mai Sibanda

• Alexander MacCall Smith’s Mma Ramostwe

Page 13: We done it how we want to! Dictating the terms of engagement for decision making over NRM.

Reality and illusion!

•Do women want empowerment?

•Are women really constrained by culture?

•Are they really weak?•Are they really invisible?

Page 14: We done it how we want to! Dictating the terms of engagement for decision making over NRM.

Empowerment!

“Women access decision making because of the good manners of their husbands!”

Why do you want us to become men in our dresses?

Page 15: We done it how we want to! Dictating the terms of engagement for decision making over NRM.

Power

“Women have influence. Men have power to define and enforce rules by which society is governed. This power allows them to monopolise the structures of governance. Influence in contrast is not institutionalised”.

Page 16: We done it how we want to! Dictating the terms of engagement for decision making over NRM.

What do we make of the silence?

Who is interpreting the silence?

When do we interpret the silence?

Multiple interpretations– We don’t care– We don’t hear/understand– We need time– This is not the place

Page 17: We done it how we want to! Dictating the terms of engagement for decision making over NRM.

Democracy

“Democracy has a female face look carefully and you will see it”

“we vote and we choose to vote for men”

Page 18: We done it how we want to! Dictating the terms of engagement for decision making over NRM.

Participation

“You are looking for participation in the wrong places”

“We have our ways, we prefer them! We done it how we want to!”

Page 19: We done it how we want to! Dictating the terms of engagement for decision making over NRM.

Are women invisible?

“Our men bring us back into the picture, they don’t operate alone. Perhaps you don’t see me but my husband does”

Page 20: We done it how we want to! Dictating the terms of engagement for decision making over NRM.

What informs decision making?

Complex networks of relationships and obligations.

Decisions are thus products of complex social processes that we don’t tune into

Page 21: We done it how we want to! Dictating the terms of engagement for decision making over NRM.

Candid questions!

• Did we misdiagnose the problem?

• Do we use the wrong tools?

• Whose questions are we addressing?

Page 22: We done it how we want to! Dictating the terms of engagement for decision making over NRM.

Taking stock?

• Do women want the type of power we want them to have?

• Can they and do they have the means to excise it?

• Does culture change at the pace of advocacy/development?

Page 23: We done it how we want to! Dictating the terms of engagement for decision making over NRM.

Can decision making be inclusive?

• Yes it can be if it gives space for local processes of engagement to take place, allows negotiations and bargaining to take place.

• Yes if allows and gives recognition to informal arenas and provides avenues for the informal to feed into the formal arenas.

Page 24: We done it how we want to! Dictating the terms of engagement for decision making over NRM.

Cont.

• Yes if need for change is from below not externally determined.

• Yes if different gender are given enough room to manouvre!

• If we understand enough about social processes of negotiations, complex relationships, hierarchies and cultural norms and motivations to identify the right interventions.

Page 25: We done it how we want to! Dictating the terms of engagement for decision making over NRM.

“You come and go, but we live here, with the setting of

the sun I go home to my husband, my family, my

people, it is with them I must live”

Page 26: We done it how we want to! Dictating the terms of engagement for decision making over NRM.

“We done it how we want to! We don’t want to be men in our

dresses!”

“Life in an African village allows me to be in my skin” (Susanna Herrera)