Wdfgkjd

download Wdfgkjd

of 1

Transcript of Wdfgkjd

  • 7/27/2019 Wdfgkjd

    1/1

    Introduction

    Pages that you view in this window won't appear in your browser history or search history and they won't leave other

    traces, like cookies, on your computer after you close all open Incognito windows. Any files that you download or

    bookmarks you create will be preserved, however.

    Sandboardingis aboardsportsimilar tosnowboarding, but competitions take place on sand dunes

    rather than snow-covered mountains. Here, anaviation ordnancemanof the US Navy sandboards down a

    dune inJebel Ali,Dubai.

    Sega Enterprises Ltd. v. Acc olade, Inc. was a decision in 1992 by theUnited States Court of Appeals

    for the Ninth Circuitthat applied Americanintellectual property lawto thereverse engineeringofcomputer

    software. Issues in the case included the scope ofcopyright, permissible uses fortrademarks, and the

    scope of thefair usedoctrine for computer code. It arose aftervideo gamepublisher

    Chad,Nigeria,Chile,Lithuania, andSaudi Arabiaareelectedto theUnited Nations Security Council,

    but Saudi Arabia declines its seat.

    U.S. PresidentBarack Obamasigns a bill passed byCongresstoreopen the federal

    governmentandraise the debt limit.

    Lao Airlines Flight 301(aircraft type pictured) crashes on approach toPakse Airport, Laos, killing all

    49 people on board.

    On October 31, 1991, Sega filed suit against Accolade in the United States District Court for the Northern

    District of California, on charges of trademark infringement and unfair competition in violation of

    theLanham Act. Copyright infringement, a violation of theCopyright Act of 1976, was added a month

    later to the list of charges. In response, Accolade filed a counterclaim for falsifying the source of its games

    by displaying the Sega trademark when the game was powered up. The case was heard by

    JudgeBarbara A. Caulfield.[1][6][10]

    Among the influences of the verdict include how Sega v. Accolade has affected the criteria for fair use

    and the responsibilities of trademark holders in legal examinations. Although Accolade had copied entireGenesis games in order to identify the TMSS, the court gave little weight to the criterion on the amount of

    the copyrighted work being copied, in light of the fact that Accolade had done so in order to create their

    own compatible software. Likewise, the nature of the work was also given less weight, essentially

    establishing a two-factor approach to evaluating fair use in the purpose of use and impact on the

    market.[27]

    It was also the first time that the Lanham Act was interpreted in the means that confusion

    resulting from the placement of one's trademark on another work by means of a security program is the

    fault of the original registrant of the trademark.[19]

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandboardinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandboardinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boardsporthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boardsporthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boardsporthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snowboardinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snowboardinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snowboardinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aviation_ordnancemanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aviation_ordnancemanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aviation_ordnancemanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jebel_Alihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jebel_Alihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jebel_Alihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dubaihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dubaihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dubaihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sega_v._Accoladehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sega_v._Accoladehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuithttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuithttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuithttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuithttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_property_lawhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_property_lawhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_property_lawhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_engineeringhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_engineeringhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_engineeringhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_softwarehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_softwarehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_softwarehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_softwarehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyrighthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyrighthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyrighthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademarkhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademarkhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademarkhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_usehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_usehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_usehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_gamehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_gamehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_gamehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chadhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chadhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigeriahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigeriahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigeriahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chilehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chilehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chilehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithuaniahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithuaniahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithuaniahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saudi_Arabiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saudi_Arabiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saudi_Arabiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_election,_2013http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_election,_2013http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_election,_2013http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Councilhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Councilhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Councilhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obamahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obamahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obamahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Congresshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Congresshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Congresshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_government_shutdown_of_2013http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_government_shutdown_of_2013http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_government_shutdown_of_2013http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_government_shutdown_of_2013http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_debt-ceiling_crisis_of_2013http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_debt-ceiling_crisis_of_2013http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_debt-ceiling_crisis_of_2013http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lao_Airlines_Flight_301http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lao_Airlines_Flight_301http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakse_International_Airporthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakse_International_Airporthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakse_International_Airporthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lanham_Acthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lanham_Acthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lanham_Acthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_Act_of_1976http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_Act_of_1976http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_Act_of_1976http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbara_A._Caulfieldhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbara_A._Caulfieldhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sega_v._Accolade#cite_note-opinion-1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sega_v._Accolade#cite_note-opinion-1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sega_v._Accolade#cite_note-KentThe_a-10http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sega_v._Accolade#cite_note-KentThe_a-10http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sega_v._Accolade#cite_note-2factor-27http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sega_v._Accolade#cite_note-2factor-27http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sega_v._Accolade#cite_note-2factor-27http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sega_v._Accolade#cite_note-copyright-19http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sega_v._Accolade#cite_note-copyright-19http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sega_v._Accolade#cite_note-copyright-19http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sega_v._Accolade#cite_note-copyright-19http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sega_v._Accolade#cite_note-2factor-27http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sega_v._Accolade#cite_note-KentThe_a-10http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sega_v._Accolade#cite_note-opinion-1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sega_v._Accolade#cite_note-opinion-1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbara_A._Caulfieldhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_Act_of_1976http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lanham_Acthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakse_International_Airporthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lao_Airlines_Flight_301http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_debt-ceiling_crisis_of_2013http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_government_shutdown_of_2013http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_government_shutdown_of_2013http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Congresshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obamahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Councilhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_election,_2013http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saudi_Arabiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithuaniahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chilehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigeriahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chadhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_gamehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_usehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademarkhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyrighthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_softwarehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_softwarehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_engineeringhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_property_lawhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuithttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuithttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sega_v._Accoladehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dubaihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jebel_Alihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aviation_ordnancemanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snowboardinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boardsporthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandboarding