WCM and IT CMF What can IVI learn? manufacturing... · WCM and IT CMF What can IVI learn? Martin...

32
© Innovation Value Institute 2013 WCM and IT CMF What can IVI learn? Martin Delaney, General Manager & Technology Leader, IVI

Transcript of WCM and IT CMF What can IVI learn? manufacturing... · WCM and IT CMF What can IVI learn? Martin...

© Innovation Value Institute 2013

WCM and IT CMF  

What can IVI learn?

Martin Delaney, General Manager & Technology Leader, IVI 

© Innovation Value Institute 2013

Ford Mustang 2015 model

© Innovation Value Institute 2013

Q : Did manufacturing capability improve and why?Q : Did the availability of frameworks help, and how?Q : Can we compare manufacturing to technology management?Q : Is there an issue and need for TM capability improvement?Q : Can frameworks help and how?

[n] denotes research references 

© Innovation Value Institute 2013

The impact of frameworks within World Class Manufacturing

Ford Mustang introduced by Lee Iacocca at the 1964 World’s Fair

© Innovation Value Institute 2013

The impact of frameworks within World Class Manufacturing

© Innovation Value Institute 2013

Manufacturing capabilities improvements

© Innovation Value Institute 2013

Manufacturing had a huge motivation to improve

1970’s Japanese business success from quality

Manufacturing seen as a capability & competitive variable

Government motivation & stimulation

Manufacturing had not changed since Taylor

It was perceived as urgent

© Innovation Value Institute 2013

Key proposition and contribution 

Dr. Edward Deming (1900 –1993)

Key proposition and contribution includedMajor breakthrough on statistical process quality control

• A believe that the organization is made up of ‘systems’ e.g. Manufacturing, marketing, etc.

• These systems must be understood by management to facilitate improvement, he called this ‘profound knowledge’you must understand how the system works to be able to change it.

• From this came Plan, Do, Study, Act.(PDSA, or more commonly known as PDCA (C = Check)

• He was acknowledged in Japan in the mid 50’s,and in the USA in the late 80’s

© Innovation Value Institute 2013

Manufacturing Frameworks played a major role in this success

Schonberger was one of the first to introduce the concept of “World Class Manufacturing”, the term was seen to embrace the techniques below.

© Innovation Value Institute 2013 10(2013 De Felice et al.)

Dr. Richard Schonberger created an integrated and flexible system capableof achieving company competitiveness with products of high quality.

Manufacturing Frameworks played major role in this success

Just in Time (JIT)

Total ProductiveMaintenance (TPM)

Total QualityManagement (TQM)

SimplicityEmployee

Involvement

WCM Model bySchonberger

© Innovation Value Institute 2013

Manufacturing capabilities improvements

11

Typical scenario in the 80’s and 90’s:-Results of a six-sigma implementation by J&A International

Inc. led by Keith Johnson:

© Innovation Value Institute 2013 12

GE, under the leadership of Jack Welch introduced WCM frameworks in mid-1990s and the subsequent success is considered to be one of the greatest success stories in business. [2011 – Mark Micheletti)].

Walsh attributes the improvements in capability, through the implementationof these frameworks, to driving more than $10 billion dollars of benefits at GEand also to driving up operating margins from 14.8 percent to 18.9 percent infour years.

Manufacturing Frameworks played major role in this success

© Innovation Value Institute 2013

In the 1980s, researchers found that American-made products had significantly more inherent defects than those made in Japan.In response to this unacceptable state, the Department of Commerce established the Malcolm Baldridge National Quality Award in 1987 in an attempt to stimulate Total Quality Management (TQM) in U.S. industry. (Jacobs & Chase, 2008)

The introduction of this type of national award andthe subsequent publicity played a pivotal role inhighlighting the deficiencies in manufacturingcapabilities and highlighted the need to engagewith recognized frameworks to improve capability.

Manufacturing capabilities improvements ‐ Incentives

© Innovation Value Institute 2013

Leveraging a Framework for capability ImprovementOrganizational Learning Knowledge Management

- Creativity- Retention- Transfer

Capability Improvement Program

Frameworks enables external learning & knowledge growth

Organizations learn3 times faster internallythan externally

Open Innovation key

Capability to bridge boundaries key

Frameworks provide thestarting repository &internal knowledge

© Innovation Value Institute 2013

Manufacturing capability improvements

© Innovation Value Institute 2013

Delivered and working

© Innovation Value Institute 2013

The Successful Model Business Goals

ManufacturingCapability

ImprovementSupportingCulture ofChange &Motivation

The RequiredCapability

A ModelDirection

Frameworks Provide

Commitment to Continuous Improvement

ASequence

DependencyUnderstanding

Comfort&

Confidence

Training&

Tools

© Innovation Value Institute 2013

What can Technology Managementlearn from Manufacturing’s superbsuccesses ?

Is there even an issue?

© Innovation Value Institute 2013

Low capabilities/maturity of Technology Management

Technology Management is today where Manufacturing was 20 years ago.

• 75% of IT staff have no or non-relevant qualifications.

In a survey conducted in 2011, one third of those surveyed,stated that their skills did not match the roles they were performing.

[3]

% of IT Employees with relevant qualifications

© Innovation Value Institute 2013

Technology Management is today where Manufacturing was 20 years ago.

• Disastrous Project overruns

The cost of IT project failures in business is estimated to be in the region of 4.5 trillion Euros worldwide

% of IT projects that come in on time & on budget

Low capabilities/maturity of Technology Management

© Innovation Value Institute 2013

Innovation and outcomesincreases where bridgingboundaries capability existOpen innovation key

Technology Management is today where Manufacturing was 20 years ago.

• Low % of CIO in influential positions.

A recent McKinsey report identified that a high percentage of CIOs do not play an influential role at senior level in their organisations.

Only 30% of CIOs involved inshaping the overall businessstrategy and agenda.

Low capabilities/maturity of Technology Management

© Innovation Value Institute 2013

Innovation and outcomesincreases where bridgingboundaries capability existOpen innovation key

Technology Management is today where Manufacturing was 20 years ago.

• IVI assessments indicate low Technology Management Maturity.

Average maturity from IT-CMF ExecutiveAssessments of 140 companies.

Only six percent of assessed organizations average Intermediate maturity

Low capabilities/maturity of Technology Management

© Innovation Value Institute 2013

The Urgency to Improve Technology Management Capability

The Business

SupportingCulture ofChange &Motivation

The RequiredCapability

Everything that'sRequired

Risk

Agility

Cost & Reliability InformationTechnology Core

Governance

Lines ofBusiness

Business

Technology

A B C D

© Innovation Value Institute 2013

Innovation and outcomesincreases where bridgingboundaries capability existOpen innovation key

The power of Frameworks

Working with frameworks allows executives to seethings from new viewpoints, assimilate complexconcepts, and address real-world problems andopportunities.[11]

Frameworks bring clarity to situations.They focus thinking, allowing organisations todrown out the noise and hone in on the capabilities that matter.

Frameworks present a tremendous opportunity for those who understand their power …

Framework thinkers make more progress. Frameworks can clear logjams andfacilitate faster solutions. There are rarely perfect answers in business, and the abilityto make faster decisions can often mean the difference between success and failure.[12]

© Innovation Value Institute 2013

Innovation and outcomesincreases where bridgingboundaries capability existOpen innovation key

Embarking on a journey towards WCM without precise roadmapis very risky. According to Sharma and Kodali (2008, p. 51), lack of“practical and detailed model to follow is an issue of concern tothose interested in the pursuit of excellence”. [13]

The use of frameworks is extremely powerful, however, you must use the correct frameworks and embrace them fully. [14]

The power of Frameworks

© Innovation Value Institute 2013

Innovation and outcomesincreases where bridgingboundaries capability existOpen innovation key

The Holistic element of Frameworks.

Why have so many organizations failedto implement it successfully?

The Toyota Production System (TPS)

Because they implemented elements of the system without understanding the power and holistic nature of the complete framework. [16]

The power of Frameworks

© Innovation Value Institute 2013

Innovation and outcomesincreases where bridgingboundaries capability existOpen innovation key

The power of Frameworks

Interdependency & Balance

RAM – Relationship Asset Management (IT-CMF)

© Innovation Value Institute 2013

The power of Frameworks

Open innovation key

Capability to bridge boundaries key

Providing a holistic repository from a coordinated source increases effectiveness.

© Innovation Value Institute 2013

The power of Frameworks

Innovation and outcomesincreases where bridgingboundaries capability existOpen innovation key

Getting the framework ‘out’ to create ‘more’ is fundamental. 

This stimulates the eco-system.

However, it is necessary to facilitate individual professionals participationin a growing community.

© Innovation Value Institute 2013

Conclusion

Organizational Learning Build a KnowledgeManagement Model

FrameworkPresentedmust have

Variablesthat impact

Effectiveness

StructureCapability to absorb change & knowledgeCompetency of peopleCulture & DeterminationLeadership Effectiveness

Clarity and ease of understanding,Adoption and integrationLink to establish roles - ownershipAcceptance of value & credibility

© Innovation Value Institute 2013

References:[1] Source: Brian Wesbury – First Trust Portfolios

[2] Source: Dr. Mark J Perry, University of Michigan. (BEA & BLS)

[3] Council of European Professional Informatics Societies (CEPIS 2011)

[4] McKinsey & Company - Pedja Arandjelovic, Libby Bulin, Naufal Khan.

[5] Innovation Value Institute (2015)

[6] Fabio De Felice, Antonella Petrillo and Stanislao Monfreda (2013). Improving Operations Performance with World Class Manufacturing Technique: A Case in Automotive Industry.

[7] National Institute of Standards and Technology • U.S. Department of Commerce Baldrige National Quality Program.

[8] http://www.acrobatplanet.com/non-fictions-ebook/pdf-ebook-applications-and-examples-six-sigma-systems-joe-yanci.html

[9] Mark Micheletti, (2013). Why GE’s Six Sigma Success Story Is Still Relevant.

[10] Brian Cazzell, Jeffrey M. Ulmer (2014). JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT & INNOVATION © JOTMI Research Group.

[11] David J. Snowden, Mary E. Boone (2012). Haervard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2007/11/a-leaders-framework-for-decision-making

[12 ]Sean Johnson (2014). The Power of Framework Thinking | Sean Johnson @intentionally

© Innovation Value Institute 2013

References:

[13] Mohammad Amin Okhovat1, Mohd Khairol Anuar Mohd Ariffin1*, Taravatsadat Nehzati2 and Seyed Ali Hosseini (2012) Development of world class manufacturing framework by using six-sigma, total productive maintenance and lean.

[14] Scientific Research and Essays Vol. 7(50), pp. 4230 -4241, 24 December, 2012

[15] www.iheardmrktg.com 1286 x 800

[16] Steven Spear, H. Kent Bowen (1999). Harvard Business Review. Decoding the DNA of the Toyota Production System.

[17] forestpolicypub.com 1093 x 797

[18] www.animated-gifts.eu – 2237 x 1520

[19] Criticalfinancial.com – 400 x 299