Water Point Mapping for Local Level Decision Making
19
Water Point Mapping for Local Level Decision Making By: Gossa Wolde and Abera Endeshaw, WaterAid Ethiopia Hilton Hotel, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 1oth April 2013 07/05/2022 1 WWW.wateraid.org
-
Upload
irc -
Category
Technology
-
view
441 -
download
0
Transcript of Water Point Mapping for Local Level Decision Making
05/03/2023 1
Water Point Mapping for
Local Level Decision Making
By: Gossa Wolde and Abera Endeshaw,
WaterAid Ethiopia
Hilton Hotel, Addis Ababa,
Ethiopia1oth April 2013
WWW.wateraid.org
05/03/2023 2
Outlines
WWW.wateraid.org
1. Background2. Introduction-WPM & Process3. The Inputs-Data Required4. Comparison between GTP & NWI 5. Decision Making6. Lessons Learnt7. Challenges for Debate
05/03/2023
1. Background• The UN/DESA and the Ethiopian MoWR have launched
in 2007 the Global Initiative for Rationalizing Water Information and Monitoring Systems (GIRWI).
• Monitoring on ad hoc basis, most often with emphasis on attaining physical plans.
• For decades, most monitoring activities were focusing on project performance; financial investments and inputs outputs delivered.
• There are no agreed comprehensive indicators.
• Recently the National WaSH Inventory (NWI) undertaken in 2010/11 is analyzed using the Access data base.
WWW.wateraidethiopia.org1
WWW.wateraid.org
05/03/2023 4
2. Introduction-WPM• The Mapper is aimed at local government
planners and WaSH field practitioners working on district, sub-district and village levels.
• The project has been implemented in eight woredas and four regions of WAE financed service delivery WaSH projects.
WWW.wateraidethiopia.org WWW.wateraid.org
05/03/2023 5
3. The Inputs-Data requiredData Parameters
Coordinate
LongitudeLatitude
Population
Woreda/DistrictKebele/sub districtVillageUser / Scheme
Water qualityBacteriological & Phiso-chemical
Management System
Presence and Absence of WaSHComs
WWW.wateraidethiopia.org
Data Parameters
Functionality
Level of service
Reasons of failureSource reliability
Water Point
Source type
Abstraction meansdrawdownAccessibility
Kebele and Woreda Boundary data from Federal CSA is also used.
WWW.wateraid.org
05/03/2023 6
Cyclic Process of the Project
WWW.wateraidethiopia.org
Capacity needs assessment
CB (IT, GPS, Tools)
Data coll & verification
Data encod
& configuratio
n
Data analysis by WAE
WPM use of information
Updating
WWW.wateraid.org
05/03/2023 7
The National Standard of Users/Schemes
WWW.wateraidethiopia.org
Types of Schemes
HDW with Indian Mark II/ Afredev Pump
Spring at Spot
Spring with
Piped System
SW/BH with HP
Deep BH
with PS
Population to be
served 270 350 4000 500 3500
WWW.wateraid.org
05/03/2023 8
4. Comparison between GTP & NWI
WWW.wateraidethiopia.org
020406080
100120
current Progress (6.1%)
GTP: refers to the Growth and Transformational Plan of the Ethiopian government, which aims to reach the 98.5% of Water coverage at the year 2015.WWW.wateraid.org
05/03/2023 9
5. Decision Making - Acceptable Access distance
WWW.wateraidethiopia.org
Decision required:• Many of the schemes are mul-functional. Hence the need for Supply Chain system (O & M).
• There are some significant kebeles fetching water from a far distanced sources, indicating the construction of new water schemes.
WWW.wateraid.org
05/03/2023 10
Decision Making - Water Point Functionality
WWW.wateraidethiopia.org
•The decision required for map-1 is to take action on the mul- functional schemes by the woreda offices.
• The decision required for Map-2 is to plan and prioritize the un- served communities with no or very less access to water sources.
WWW.wateraid.org
05/03/2023 11
Decision Making - Coverage functionality
WWW.wateraidethiopia.org
• Additional water points are required for fair distribution as per the national standard.
• The woreda has allocated 1.4 million ETB for Water schemes construction from the government treasury source as a result of the above mapping. WWW.wateraid.org
05/03/2023 12
Capacitating the woreda Staffs
WWW.wateraidethiopia.org
• Woreda technical Staffs were given the required CB training on IT, GPS, data collection and WPM
WWW.wateraid.org
05/03/2023 13
Data verification on Field
WWW.wateraidethiopia.org
• After the data have been collected, technically selected sample kebeles and WP were verified by WA for quality accuracy purpose.
WWW.wateraid.org
05/03/2023 14
Decision Making –Budget allocation
WWW.wateraidethiopia.org
Decision required:
The North Achefer woreda, Chief Administrator chairing the cabinet meeting (Heads of Sectors) on their regular meeting.
• The agenda presented by the head of Water office After discussion has got decision and approval of 1.4 million ETB for New water points construction.
WWW.wateraid.org
05/03/2023 15
Decision Making –Resource Mobilization
WWW.wateraidethiopia.org
• Bonke woreda (SNNPR) has developed a proposal and using the maps as evidences and mobilized about 1.2 Million ETB from Canada Embassy for WaSH investment.
05/03/2023 16
6. Lessons Learnt• The average investment cost for one woreda is about
55,000 ETB (2,980 USD/1,900 Pounds).
• The maps for potential proposal development. (e.g.
Bonke (SNNP Region) generated 1.2 Million ETB).
• close supervision & proper verification for quality issue.
• The Water Point Mapping is a process, it should be updated periodically at least once in a year.
• The outputs could be used in informed planning, reporting
advocacy & influencing, and decision making processes.
WWW.wateraidethiopia.org WWW.wateraid.org
05/03/2023 17
7. Challenges for debate
• Affordability (55,000 ETB /2,980 USD)/Woreda-HOW MUCH
• The high & frequent turnover of technical staffs -WHAT
• Approaches for scaling up the project-HOW?
• The relevance of WMP as compared to the Access Program
used for NWI in the MoWE-HOW
WWW.wateraidethiopia.org
05/03/2023 18
Thank you for listening
WWW.wateraid.org
05/03/2023 19
Future Contacts
Gossa Wolde [email protected]
&Abera Endeshaw
Website: WWW.Wateraid.org
WWW.wateraid.org
