Water Mist Spray Modeling With FDS Fire and Evacuation Modeling Technical Conference 2011 Simo...

download Water Mist Spray Modeling With FDS Fire and Evacuation Modeling Technical Conference 2011 Simo Hostikka, Jukka Vaari, Topi Sikanen, Antti Paajanen VTT.

If you can't read please download the document

Transcript of Water Mist Spray Modeling With FDS Fire and Evacuation Modeling Technical Conference 2011 Simo...

  • Slide 1

Water Mist Spray Modeling With FDS Fire and Evacuation Modeling Technical Conference 2011 Simo Hostikka, Jukka Vaari, Topi Sikanen, Antti Paajanen VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Slide 2 2 04/12/2015 Slide 3 3 Slide 4 4 Slide 5 5 Slide 6 6 SPRAY COMPUTATIONS IN FDS Droplet momentum Size distribution Slide 7 7 04/12/2015 DRAG REDUCTION BY WAKE EFFECT L Ramrez-Mnoz et al. (2007). Slide 8 8 04/12/2015 INTRODUCING THE DROPLETS INTO THE COMPUTATION Segment of a spherical surface Here: = 5 and = 0 Initial velocity: User specifies the offset distance Slide 9 9 04/12/2015 EXAMPLE NOZZLES Spraying systems LN-2 High-pressure micro- nozzles A, B and C from Marioff. Multi-orifice spray heads Slide 10 10 04/12/2015 SPRAY PROFILE TESTS NFPA 750 Slide 11 11 04/12/2015 RESULTS: SPRAY PROFILES (LN-2 NOZZLE) 0.4 m below the nozzle 20 bar pressure Slide 12 12 04/12/2015 RESULTS: SPRAY PROFILES (A, B, C NOZZLES) 1 m below the nozzle 70 bar pressure Slide 13 13 04/12/2015 AIR ENTRAINMENT TESTS Rectangular channel 2.0 m 0.6 m 0.6 m Multi-orifice nozzles in the middle of the channel Pressures 5010 bar Air speed measurement 0.5 m upstream (center and 6 cm from wall) Slide 14 14 04/12/2015 RESULTS: AIR ENTRAINMENT Channel center 6 cm from wall SH4 and SH5 have different perimeter angles Difference in momentum transfer difficult to capture Results were sensitive to offset value Slide 15 15 04/12/2015 RADIATION ATTENUATION TESTS LPG gas heater 0.2 m 0.3 m Temperature 950 C Nozzles A, B and C 50, 70 and 100 bar Experimental uncertainty < 7 % Slide 16 16 04/12/2015 RADIATION ATTENUATION SIMULATIONS Two sets of simulations Set 1 = good resolution Set 2 = even better Slide 17 17 04/12/2015 RADIATION ATTENUATION RESULTS Set 1 Set 2 Slide 18 18 04/12/2015 RADIATION ATTENUATION SENSITIVITY STUDY x = 2.0 cm DROP INSERT RATE = 1 10 5 1/s x = 1.0 cm DROP INSERT RATE= 1 10 5 1/s Slide 19 19 04/12/2015 Slide 20 20 04/12/2015 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Spray profile measurements were performed by Maria Putkiranta, Riina Rajala, Pentti Saarenrinne and Markus Honkanen of the Tampere University of Technology. Co-operation with the members of the FDS development team Funding Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation, Marioff Corporation Oy, Rautaruukki Oyj, YIT Kiinteisttekniikka Oy Insinritoimisto Markku Kauriala Ltd.