Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface more heating at...

58
Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface more heating at equator, less at poles
  • date post

    15-Jan-2016
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    219
  • download

    0

Transcript of Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface more heating at...

Page 1: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

Water Cycle: Global Circulation

• Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface

more heating at equator, less at poles

Page 2: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

Latitudinal Energy Balance• Energy input&loss nonuniform over Earth’s surface

atmosphere+ocean circulation transport heat towards poles

Page 3: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

Blackbody Radiation 1

Radiation energy R a function of the temperature of the body emitting it:

R = ( — Stefan-Boltzmann constant)

& Energy is emitted in different proportions at different frequencies (wavelengths) that also depend on the temperature of the body emitting it

[Hottest bodies emit shortest wavelength radiation (x-rays, etc.), while coolest bodies have their peak emissions in long-wavelength microwave or radiofrequencies (e.g. 2.7K big-bang relic blackbody cosmic radiation)]

T 4

Page 4: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

Blackbody Radiation 2

Page 5: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

Solar Radiation at Earth

Page 6: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

Greenhouse Effect

Atmosphere ‘transparent’ to solar radiation at main wavelengths of sunlight (‘high-T blackbody radiation’)

Atmosphere absorbs radiation at infrared (‘Earth heat’) wavelengths at which the Earth emits radiation

Of the radiation energy that the atmosphere absorbs, half is re-emitted back towards the Earth’s surface, thereby warming it.

(e.g. clear nights -> cold nights, cloudy nights -> warmer nights)

No reason this couldn’t work in reverse (e.g. a material that reflected optical energy but was transparent to infrared would be cooled by an ‘inverse greenhouse’ effect)

Page 7: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

Mean Annual Heat Balance

Atmosphere blocks incoming solar radiation AND creates greenhouse effect

23% of incoming solar energy goes into evaporating water (~1 ton/m2-year)

Page 8: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

23_01.jpg

Page 9: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

23_07.jpg

Page 10: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

23_Featured_Art.jpgZoomable ArtPC Mac

Page 11: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

22_39b.jpg

Page 12: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

22_05a.jpg

Page 13: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

22_05b.jpg

Page 14: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

Temperature Change @ all Latitudes

Page 15: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

22_02b.jpg

Page 16: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

22_07.jpg

Page 17: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

22_03d.jpg

Page 18: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

23_09.jpg

Page 19: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

22_43.jpg

Page 20: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

22_34c.jpg

Page 21: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

22_37a.jpg

Page 22: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

22_39c.jpg

Page 23: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

22_42.jpg

Page 24: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

22_40.jpg

Page 25: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

23_08ab.jpg

Page 26: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

23_08cde.jpg

Page 27: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

Caution!• What we can now accurately measure back in time are 18O/16O and 12C/13C anomalies in fossil shells.

• These proxies can be used to ‘determine’ past temperatures and atmospheric CO2 levels that are extremely precise — but not necessarily nearly as accurate as they are precise…

• Recent glaciations can be well correlated with minor changes in the amount of sunlight reaching the northern latitudes in summer (e.g. how much winter snow can melt in the summer)

• CO2 was historically low during recent glacial times — cause or effect?

• We are now rapidly raising the global CO2 level — is this likely to be bad, good or neutral for the planet?

Page 28: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

23_11a.jpg

Page 29: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

23_11bc.jpg

Page 30: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

22_46.jpg

Caution! Proxy & Model-based curves!

Page 31: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

23_12a.jpg

Page 32: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

23_12b.jpg

Page 33: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

23_12c.jpg

Page 34: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

23_12d.jpg

Page 35: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

23_21.jpg

False hockey-stick? (Wall Street Journal, Fall 2005)

Arctic Sea-Ice area down 10% last 50yrs.

Sea-Ice thickness down 40% last 50 yrs

Winter sea-ice critical to arctic bottom-water formation (ice-freezing expels cold+salty brine which sinks to seafloor)

Page 36: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

Borehole T-increase Measurement (1)

Page 37: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

Borehole T-increase Measurement (2)

Warming 1°C over past 5 centuries

50% of warming over past century

80% over past 2 centuries

Page 38: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

Borehole T-increase Nonuniform

Page 39: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

Correlation vs. Causation PitfallCausation Correlation

BUT

Correlation Causation

SEVERAL PROPOSED CAUSES FOR WARMING:

(1)Solar Variability

(2) Human-induced Greenhouse gases (generally believed by climate scientists to be the dominant cause — and still passing ever-improving tests…)

Page 40: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

‘Political Agenda’ Pitfall(1) Real Money is at stake (Climate Change affects Wall St.)

e.g. Global Warming is only a theory, predicted effects are highly uncertain, scientists are not unanimous, data are in error, more research is needed….. AND meanwhile we should try to keep on doing business as usual…

ALTERNATIVE (environmentally conservative program)

(1) Acknowledge uncertainty is inherent

(2) Recognize it is usually easier to prevent damage than repair it later — it will cost a lot less to start now to mitigate problems than to start only when problems are becoming catastrophic... What if only a 20% chance of ‘disaster’? 10%? How would we react to this threat if it was a military threat? By doing nothing because the risk is low?

(3) Shift burden of proof away from those advocating protection to those proposing an action that may be harmful

Page 41: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

23_20.jpg

Page 42: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

Sunspots

Page 43: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

Sunspot Cycle Length vs. T since 1860

Page 44: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

14C, 10Be: Proxies for solar activity?

15N + p (from cosmic ray) 14C + p + p (14C has 5750yr halflife)

14N + cosmic ray 10Be + 4He (10Be has 1.51My halflife)

Both 14C and 10Be rapidly rain out of atmosphere once produced in upper atmosphere.

Both are not produced by any decay processes in Earth’s interior

Page 45: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

Sunspot Intensity vs. 14C since 1680

Page 46: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

Maunder & Spörer Minima vs. 14C

Page 47: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

10Be vs. 14C

Page 48: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

10Be vs. 18O?

Does Be anomaly reflect a cause or consequence of the process causing the 18O anomaly?

Page 49: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

23_15b.jpg

Page 50: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

23_17a.jpg

Page 51: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

23_17b.jpg

Page 52: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

23_18.jpg

Page 53: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

Ozone Hole — a climate success story! We can change ‘business as usual’ with a positive world-action

Page 54: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

Ozone Hole — timeline of the social response…

Steps in the historical process of ozone ‘remediation’ by banning of CFCs as refrigerants…

(1) Ozone ‘hole’ noticed in Antarctica — increasing ozone annual minimum in upper atmosphere

(2) Theory proposed for this — catalytic effect of CFCs on ice-particles enhancing natural ozone destruction processes in the uppermost atmosphere (ozone created by solar radiation, destroyed by natural processes, amount reflects a balance between competing processes)

(3) Theory questioned — but affirmed in all tests so far.

(4) Actions finally taken to ban certain CFCs and search for different compounds that can also be used as refrigerents but which are less stable, and less catalytic

Page 55: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

23_22.jpg

Page 56: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

23_23.jpg

Page 57: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

22_34ab.jpg

Page 58: Water Cycle: Global Circulation Energy input is not uniform over Earth’s surface  more heating at equator, less at poles.

23_View.jpg