Washington Department of Ecology€¦ · Ecology’s vehicle costs have increased considerably...
51
Washington Department of Ecology 2019 Supplemental Budget Original printed on recycled paper October 1, 2018
Transcript of Washington Department of Ecology€¦ · Ecology’s vehicle costs have increased considerably...
Washington Department of Ecology
2019 Supplemental Budget
Original printed on recycled paper October 1, 2018
*** This page intentionally blank. ***
September 26, 2018
TO: David Schumacher, Director Office of Financial Management
FROM: Maia D. Bellon, Director
SUBJECT: 2019 Supplemental Budget Requests for Ecology
As the state’s lead environmental agency, Ecology’s mission is to protect and preserve the environment for current and future generations, while valuing and supporting Washington’s economic success. We’re tackling challenges that are unique to our times and require us to take a broad and holistic approach to our work that focuses not only on what we do, but how we do it.
Ecology’s goals are to:
• Protect and restore land, air, and water. • Prevent pollution. • Promote healthy communities and natural resources. • Deliver efficient and effective services.
Ecology’s 2019 Supplemental Operating Budget request totals $1.6 million, and the Capital Budget request is $200,000. We are requesting operating resources for three maintenance level adjustments and unanticipated litigation costs related to the Millennium Bulk Terminal. We are also requesting additional state match capital funding for the Clean Water State Revolving Fund loan program because we received $1 million more in federal funding than originally anticipated. The federal capitalization grant requires a 20 percent state match.
Thank you for considering our 2019 Supplemental Budget request. We will work with our assigned budget analysts as they review this request in detail. Please let us know if you have questions.
Attachment
cc: JT Austin, Senior Policy Advisor, Natural Resources, Office of the Governor Myra Baldini, Budget Assistant to the Governor, OFM Jim Cahill, Senior Budget Assistant to the Governor, OFM Chris Davis, Senior Policy Advisor, Climate & Energy Affairs, Office of the Governor
Rob Duff, Senior Policy Advisor, Natural Resources/Environment, Office of the Governor Erik Fairchild, Chief Financial Officer, Department of Ecology
Page 3 of 51
David Schumacher, Director September 26, 2018 Page 2 Jed Herman, Fiscal Analyst, Senate Ways & Means Committee Dan Jones, Fiscal Analyst, House Appropriations/Natural Resources Committee Steve Masse, Fiscal Analyst, House Capital Budget Committee
Jennifer Masterson, Senior Budget Assistant to the Governor, OFM Lisa McCollum, Legislative Assistant, House Appropriations Committee
Melissa Palmer, Capital Budget Coordinator, House Capital Budget Committee Keith Phillips, Policy Director, Office of the Governor Richard Ramsey, Capital Budget Coordinator, Senate Ways and Means Committee Linda Steinmann, Budget Assistant to the Governor, OFM
Page 4 of 51
Department of Ecology 2019 Supplemental Budget
Table of Contents
Agency Overview 1. Cover Letter from the Director ....................................................................................... 3
2. Table of Contents ............................................................................................................ 5
3. Budget Proposal Summary (Spreadsheet) ....................................................................... 7
Operating Budget 4. Recommendation Summary ............................................................................................ 9
5. Performance Measure Incremental Estimates ............................................................... 11
6. Decision Package Summary Report .............................................................................. 23
7. MA DB DES Vehicle Fleet Costs ................................................................................. 25
8. MA DD Manchester Lab Facility Costs ....................................................................... 31
9. MA DC DES Training Admin Fee Increase ................................................................. 35
10. PL DA Lighthouse Litigation ....................................................................................... 39
11. Summarized Revenue Report........................................................................................ 43
Capital Budget 12. Capital Ten Year Report ............................................................................................... 45
13. 40000013 Water Pollution Control State Match ........................................................... 47
14. Fund Transfers List ....................................................................................................... 51
Page 5 of 51
*** This page intentionally blank. ***
Page 6 of 51
$ in thousands 9/20/2018
OperatingFTE
*GF-State Other Total
2017-19 Current Biennium Total (after 2018 Supp.) 1,635.7 42,240 462,999 505,239 Maintenance Level Changes1. DES Vehicle Fleet Costs 0.0 47 341 388 2. Manchester Lab Facility Costs 0.0 75 75 3. DES Training Admin Fee Increase 0.0 4 31 35 Policy Level ChangesOther4. Lighthouse Litigation 0.0 1,137 1,137 Total Changes 0.0 1,188 447 1,635 Total Proposed Operating Budget Request 1,635.7 43,428 463,446 506,874
CapitalSBCA MTCA Other Total
1. Water Pollution Control State Match 194 194 Total Proposed Capital Budget Request 0 0 194 194
Department of Ecology2019 Supplemental Budget Request
* Biennialized FTEs
Page 7 of 51
*** This page intentionally blank. ***
Page 8 of 51
State of Washington
Recommendation Summary
Agency:
Version:
ABS024
461 Department of Ecology
S2 Supplemental 2019
Dollars in Thousands
Total FundsOther FundsFund StateGeneral
FY2 FTEs
CB T0PL Current Biennium Base 505,239 462,999 42,240 1,635.7
1,635.7 2017-19 Current Biennium Total 42,240 462,999 505,239
Total Carry Forward LevelPercent Change from Current Biennium .0%
42,240 462,999
.0% .0%
505,239
.0%
1,635.7
Maintenance – Other ChangesML9Z Recast to Activity 0 0 0 0.0 MLDB DES Vehicle Fleet Costs 47 341 388 0.0 MLDC DES Training Admin Fee Increase 4 31 35 0.0 MLDD Manchester Lab Facility Costs 0 75 75 0.0
0.0 51 447 498 Maintenance – Other Total
Total Maintenance Level
.0%
42,291 463,446
.1% .1%Percent Change from Current Biennium
505,737
.1%
1,635.7
Policy – Other ChangesDAPL Lighthouse Litigation 1,137 0 1,137 0.0
Policy – Other Total 0.0 1,137 0 1,137
2017-19 Total Proposed Budget
Subtotal - Policy Level Changes
.0%Percent Change from Current Biennium
43,428 463,446
1,137 0
2.8% .1%
506,874
1,137
.3%
1,635.7
0.0
Page 1 of 2 Date Run: 9/27/2018 7:53:52AM Page 9 of 51
State of Washington
Recommendation Summary
Agency:
Version:
ABS024
461 Department of Ecology
S2 Supplemental 2019
Dollars in Thousands
Total FundsOther FundsFund StateGeneral
FY2 FTEs
ML DES Vehicle Fleet CostsDB
Ecology’s vehicle costs have increased considerably since the agency’s fleet merged with the Department of Enterprise Services (DES), beginning in Fiscal Year 2014. DES fleet vehicles are charged on a fee for service basis, and are excluded from the allocation funding provided to state agencies through the central service model . Ecology is requesting additional appropriation authority for the 2019 Fiscal Year to cover the cost increases incurred between the last two closed biennia , 2013-15 and 2015-17.
ML DES Training Admin Fee IncreaseDC
The Department of Enterprise Services (DES) has reassessed the administrative fee they charge for in-person training classes . This has resulted in a cost increase of $350 per class, from $150 per class in the 2015-17 Biennium to $500 effective October 1 , 2018. Ecology is requesting a maintenance level increase in Fiscal Year 2019 appropriation to cover the cost increases associated with this reassessment.
ML Manchester Lab Facility CostsDD
Ecology shares space with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at their Manchester Environmental Laboratory in Kitsap County. Ecology has been notified by EPA that costs for the facility have increased as of January 2018 . This request is for a maintenance level increase in Fiscal Year 2019 to cover the additional costs to ensure that core environmental laboratory analysis will continue to inform Ecology's important environmental work and the work of other state agencies , tribes, and local partners. This work helps protect, preserve, and enhance Washington's environment for current and future generations. (State Toxics Control Account, Water Quality Permit Account)
PL Lighthouse LitigationDA
Ecology is a co-defendant with the Governor and Commissioner of Public Lands in a U .S. federal court case filed by Lighthouse Resources, parent company of Millennium Bulk Terminals. Trial is set for May 2019, and Ecology is requesting appropriation consistent with the Office of the Attorney General (AGO) request to cover the costs of expert witnesses , discovery, motions practice, and other costs that will occur during the trial preparation and trial phases of the case. (General Fund-State)
Page 2 of 2 Date Run: 9/27/2018 7:53:52AM Page 10 of 51
Per
form
ance
Mea
sure
In
crem
enta
l E
stim
ates
Sta
te o
f W
ash
ing
ton
AB
S0
33
Age
ncy
: S
essi
on:
461
Dep
artm
ent
of E
colo
gy20
19 S
up
p
Act
ivit
y:
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
act
ivit
yC
BT
0P
LC
urre
nt B
ienn
ium
Bas
eN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
CB
T0
PL
Cur
rent
Bie
nniu
m B
ase
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
act
ivit
yM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
9Z
Rec
ast
to A
ctiv
ity
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
act
ivit
yM
LD
BD
ES
Veh
icle
Fle
et C
ost
sN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
act
ivit
yM
LD
CD
ES
Tra
inin
g A
dm
in F
ee I
ncre
ase
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
LD
CD
ES
Tra
inin
g A
dm
in F
ee I
ncre
ase
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
act
ivit
yM
LD
DM
anch
este
r L
ab F
acil
ity
Co
sts
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
LD
DM
anch
este
r L
ab F
acil
ity
Co
sts
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
act
ivit
yP
LD
AL
ight
hous
e L
itig
atio
nN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
PL
DA
Lig
htho
use
Lit
igat
ion
Act
ivit
y:
A00
1 C
lari
fyin
g W
ater
Rig
hts
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
Act
ivit
y:
A00
2 A
dm
inis
trat
ion
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
LD
CD
ES
Tra
inin
g A
dm
in F
ee I
ncre
ase
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geP
LD
AL
ight
hous
e L
itig
atio
n
Act
ivit
y:
A00
3 I
mp
lem
enti
ng
Inte
grat
ed S
olu
tion
s to
Pro
tect
In
stre
am R
esou
rces
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
LD
CD
ES
Tra
inin
g A
dm
in F
ee I
ncre
ase
Da
te R
un
: 9
/27
/20
18
7
:55
:00
AM
P
age
1 o
f 11
Page 11 of 51
Per
form
ance
Mea
sure
In
crem
enta
l E
stim
ates
Sta
te o
f W
ash
ing
ton
AB
S0
33
Age
ncy
: S
essi
on:
461
Dep
artm
ent
of E
colo
gy20
19 S
up
p
Act
ivit
y:
A00
5 C
lean
up
th
e M
ost
Con
tam
inat
ed S
ites
Fir
st (
Up
lan
d a
nd
Aq
uat
ic)
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
LD
CD
ES
Tra
inin
g A
dm
in F
ee I
ncre
ase
Act
ivit
y:
A00
6 C
lean
Up
Pol
lute
d W
ater
s
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
LD
CD
ES
Tra
inin
g A
dm
in F
ee I
ncre
ase
Act
ivit
y:
A00
7 C
ond
uct
En
viro
nm
enta
l S
tud
ies
for
Pol
luti
on S
ourc
e Id
enti
fica
tion
an
d C
ontr
ol
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
LD
CD
ES
Tra
inin
g A
dm
in F
ee I
ncre
ase
Act
ivit
y:
A00
8 C
ontr
ol S
torm
wat
er P
ollu
tion
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
LD
CD
ES
Tra
inin
g A
dm
in F
ee I
ncre
ase
Act
ivit
y:
A00
9 E
lim
inat
e W
aste
an
d P
rom
ote
Mat
eria
l R
euse
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
Da
te R
un
: 9
/27
/20
18
7
:55
:00
AM
P
age
2 o
f 11
Page 12 of 51
Per
form
ance
Mea
sure
In
crem
enta
l E
stim
ates
Sta
te o
f W
ash
ing
ton
AB
S0
33
Age
ncy
: S
essi
on:
461
Dep
artm
ent
of E
colo
gy20
19 S
up
p
Act
ivit
y:
A01
0 P
reve
nt
and
Pic
k U
p L
itte
r
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
LD
CD
ES
Tra
inin
g A
dm
in F
ee I
ncre
ase
Act
ivit
y:
A01
1 E
nsu
re D
am S
afet
y
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
LD
CD
ES
Tra
inin
g A
dm
in F
ee I
ncre
ase
Act
ivit
y:
A01
2 E
nsu
re E
nvi
ron
men
tal
Lab
orat
orie
s P
rovi
de
Qu
alit
y D
ata
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
y
Act
ivit
y:
A01
3 F
un
d L
ocal
Eff
orts
to
Cle
an U
p T
oxic
Sit
es a
nd
Man
age
or R
edu
ce W
aste
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
Act
ivit
y:
A01
4 R
esto
re t
he
Air
, Soi
l, a
nd
Wat
er C
onta
min
ated
fro
m P
ast
Act
ivit
ies
at H
anfo
rd
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
Act
ivit
y:
A01
5 C
lean
Up
an
d R
emov
e L
arge
, Com
ple
x, C
onta
min
ated
Fac
ilit
ies
thro
ugh
out
Han
ford
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
y
Da
te R
un
: 9
/27
/20
18
7
:55
:00
AM
P
age
3 o
f 11
Page 13 of 51
Per
form
ance
Mea
sure
In
crem
enta
l E
stim
ates
Sta
te o
f W
ash
ing
ton
AB
S0
33
Age
ncy
: S
essi
on:
461
Dep
artm
ent
of E
colo
gy20
19 S
up
p
Act
ivit
y:
A01
6 T
reat
an
d D
isp
ose
of H
anfo
rd’s
Hig
h-L
evel
Rad
ioac
tive
Tan
k W
aste
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
LD
CD
ES
Tra
inin
g A
dm
in F
ee I
ncre
ase
Act
ivit
y:
A01
7 E
nsu
re S
afe
Tan
k O
per
atio
ns,
Sto
rage
of
Tan
k W
aste
s, &
Clo
sure
of
the
Was
te S
tora
ge T
ank
s at
Han
ford
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
LD
CD
ES
Tra
inin
g A
dm
in F
ee I
ncre
ase
Act
ivit
y:
A01
8 E
nsu
re t
he
Saf
e M
anag
emen
t of
Rad
ioac
tive
Mix
ed W
aste
at
Han
ford
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
Act
ivit
y:
A01
9 I
mp
rove
Com
mu
nit
y A
cces
s to
Haz
ard
ous
Su
bst
ance
an
d W
aste
In
form
atio
n
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
LD
CD
ES
Tra
inin
g A
dm
in F
ee I
ncre
ase
Act
ivit
y:
A02
0 I
mp
rove
Qu
alit
y of
Dat
a U
sed
for
En
viro
nm
enta
l D
ecis
ion
Mak
ing
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
y
Act
ivit
y:
A02
1 I
ncr
ease
Com
pli
ance
an
d A
ct o
n E
nvi
ron
men
tal
Th
reat
s fr
om H
azar
dou
s W
aste
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
LD
CD
ES
Tra
inin
g A
dm
in F
ee I
ncre
ase
Da
te R
un
: 9
/27
/20
18
7
:55
:00
AM
P
age
4 o
f 11
Page 14 of 51
Per
form
ance
Mea
sure
In
crem
enta
l E
stim
ates
Sta
te o
f W
ash
ing
ton
AB
S0
33
Age
ncy
: S
essi
on:
461
Dep
artm
ent
of E
colo
gy20
19 S
up
p
Act
ivit
y:
A02
2 I
ncr
ease
Saf
e H
azar
dou
s W
aste
Man
agem
ent
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
Act
ivit
y:
A02
3 M
anag
e U
nd
ergr
oun
d S
tora
ge T
ank
s to
Min
imiz
e R
elea
ses
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
Act
ivit
y:
A02
4 M
anag
e W
ater
Rig
hts
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
Act
ivit
y:
A02
5 M
easu
re A
ir P
ollu
tion
Lev
els
and
Em
issi
ons
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
Act
ivit
y:
A02
6 M
easu
re C
onta
min
ants
in
th
e E
nvi
ron
men
t b
y P
erfo
rmin
g L
abor
ator
y A
nal
yses
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DC
DE
S T
rain
ing
Ad
min
Fee
Inc
reas
eN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DD
Man
ches
ter
Lab
Fac
ilit
y C
ost
s
Act
ivit
y:
A02
7 M
onit
or t
he
Qu
alit
y of
Sta
te W
ater
s an
d M
easu
re S
trea
m F
low
s S
tate
wid
e
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
LD
CD
ES
Tra
inin
g A
dm
in F
ee I
ncre
ase
Da
te R
un
: 9
/27
/20
18
7
:55
:00
AM
P
age
5 o
f 11
Page 15 of 51
Per
form
ance
Mea
sure
In
crem
enta
l E
stim
ates
Sta
te o
f W
ash
ing
ton
AB
S0
33
Age
ncy
: S
essi
on:
461
Dep
artm
ent
of E
colo
gy20
19 S
up
p
Act
ivit
y:
A02
8 I
mp
rove
En
viro
nm
enta
l C
omp
lian
ce a
t S
tate
's L
arge
st I
nd
ust
rial
Fac
ilit
ies
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
Act
ivit
y:
A02
9 P
rep
are
and
Res
pon
d t
o D
rou
ght
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
y
Act
ivit
y:
A03
0 P
rep
are
for
Agg
ress
ive
Res
pon
se t
o O
il a
nd
Haz
ard
ous
Mat
eria
l In
cid
ents
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
LD
CD
ES
Tra
inin
g A
dm
in F
ee I
ncre
ase
Act
ivit
y:
A03
1 P
reve
nt
Haz
ard
ous
Was
te P
ollu
tion
Th
rou
gh P
erm
itti
ng,
Clo
sure
, an
d C
orre
ctiv
e A
ctio
n
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
Act
ivit
y:
A03
2 P
reve
nt
Poi
nt
Sou
rce
Wat
er P
ollu
tion
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
LD
CD
ES
Tra
inin
g A
dm
in F
ee I
ncre
ase
Act
ivit
y:
A03
3 P
reve
nt
Oil
Sp
ills
fro
m V
esse
ls a
nd
Oil
Han
dli
ng
Fac
ilit
ies
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
Da
te R
un
: 9
/27
/20
18
7
:55
:00
AM
P
age
6 o
f 11
Page 16 of 51
Per
form
ance
Mea
sure
In
crem
enta
l E
stim
ates
Sta
te o
f W
ash
ing
ton
AB
S0
33
Age
ncy
: S
essi
on:
461
Dep
artm
ent
of E
colo
gy20
19 S
up
p
Act
ivit
y:
A03
4 P
reve
nt
Un
hea
lth
y A
ir a
nd
Vio
lati
ons
of A
ir Q
ual
ity
Sta
nd
ard
s
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
LD
CD
ES
Tra
inin
g A
dm
in F
ee I
ncre
ase
Act
ivit
y:
A03
5 P
rom
ote
Com
pli
ance
wit
h W
ater
Law
s
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
Act
ivit
y:
A03
6 P
rote
ct a
nd
Man
age
Sh
orel
ines
in
Par
tner
ship
wit
h L
ocal
Gov
ern
men
ts
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
LD
CD
ES
Tra
inin
g A
dm
in F
ee I
ncre
ase
Act
ivit
y:
A03
7 P
rote
ct W
ater
Qu
alit
y b
y R
evie
win
g an
d C
ond
itio
nin
g C
onst
ruct
ion
Pro
ject
s
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
LD
CD
ES
Tra
inin
g A
dm
in F
ee I
ncre
ase
Act
ivit
y:
A03
8 P
rote
ct, R
esto
re, a
nd
Man
age
Wet
lan
ds
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
LD
CD
ES
Tra
inin
g A
dm
in F
ee I
ncre
ase
Da
te R
un
: 9
/27
/20
18
7
:55
:00
AM
P
age
7 o
f 11
Page 17 of 51
Per
form
ance
Mea
sure
In
crem
enta
l E
stim
ates
Sta
te o
f W
ash
ing
ton
AB
S0
33
Age
ncy
: S
essi
on:
461
Dep
artm
ent
of E
colo
gy20
19 S
up
p
Act
ivit
y:
A04
0 P
rovi
de
Tec
hn
ical
an
d F
inan
cial
Ass
ista
nce
to
Loc
al G
over
nm
ents
to
Red
uce
Flo
od H
azar
ds
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
Act
ivit
y:
A04
1 P
rovi
de
Tec
hn
ical
Ass
ista
nce
on
Sta
te E
nvi
ron
men
tal
Pol
icy
Act
(S
EP
A)
Rev
iew
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
Act
ivit
y:
A04
2 P
rovi
de
Tec
hn
ical
Tra
inin
g, E
du
cati
on,
and
Res
earc
h t
hro
ugh
Pad
illa
Bay
Est
uar
ine
Res
erve
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
LD
CD
ES
Tra
inin
g A
dm
in F
ee I
ncre
ase
Act
ivit
y:
A04
3 P
rovi
de
Wat
er Q
ual
ity
Fin
anci
al A
ssis
tan
ce
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
LD
CD
ES
Tra
inin
g A
dm
in F
ee I
ncre
ase
Act
ivit
y:
A04
4 P
rovi
de
Wat
er R
esou
rces
Dat
a an
d I
nfo
rmat
ion
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
LD
CD
ES
Tra
inin
g A
dm
in F
ee I
ncre
ase
Da
te R
un
: 9
/27
/20
18
7
:55
:00
AM
P
age
8 o
f 11
Page 18 of 51
Per
form
ance
Mea
sure
In
crem
enta
l E
stim
ates
Sta
te o
f W
ash
ing
ton
AB
S0
33
Age
ncy
: S
essi
on:
461
Dep
artm
ent
of E
colo
gy20
19 S
up
p
Act
ivit
y:
A04
5 R
edu
ce A
ir P
ollu
tion
fro
m I
nd
ust
rial
an
d C
omm
erci
al S
ourc
es
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
LD
CD
ES
Tra
inin
g A
dm
in F
ee I
ncre
ase
Act
ivit
y:
A04
7 R
edu
ce H
ealt
h a
nd
En
viro
nm
enta
l T
hre
ats
from
Mot
or V
ehic
le E
mis
sion
s
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
Act
ivit
y:
A04
8 R
edu
ce H
ealt
h a
nd
En
viro
nm
enta
l T
hre
ats
from
Sm
oke
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
Act
ivit
y:
A04
9 R
edu
ce N
onp
oin
t-S
ourc
e W
ater
Pol
luti
on
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
Act
ivit
y:
A05
1 R
edu
ce R
isk
fro
m T
oxic
Air
Pol
luta
nts
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
Act
ivit
y:
A05
2 R
edu
ce t
he
Gen
erat
ion
of
Haz
ard
ous
Was
te a
nd
th
e U
se o
f T
oxic
Su
bst
ance
s th
rou
gh T
ech
nic
al A
ssis
tan
c No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
Da
te R
un
: 9
/27
/20
18
7
:55
:00
AM
P
age
9 o
f 11
Page 19 of 51
Per
form
ance
Mea
sure
In
crem
enta
l E
stim
ates
Sta
te o
f W
ash
ing
ton
AB
S0
33
Age
ncy
: S
essi
on:
461
Dep
artm
ent
of E
colo
gy20
19 S
up
p
Act
ivit
y:
A05
3 R
egu
late
Wel
l C
onst
ruct
ion
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
Act
ivit
y:
A05
4 R
apid
ly R
esp
ond
to
and
Cle
an U
p O
il a
nd
Haz
ard
ous
Mat
eria
l S
pil
ls
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
Act
ivit
y:
A05
5 R
esto
re P
ub
lic
Nat
ura
l R
esou
rces
Dam
aged
by
Oil
Sp
ills
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
y
Act
ivit
y:
A05
6 R
esto
re W
ater
shed
s b
y S
up
por
tin
g C
omm
un
ity-
Bas
ed P
roje
cts
wit
h t
he
Was
hin
gton
Con
serv
atio
n C
orp
s No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
Act
ivit
y:
A05
7 S
ervi
ces
to S
ite
Ow
ner
s th
at V
olu
nte
er t
o C
lean
Up
th
eir
Con
tam
inat
ed S
ites
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
LD
CD
ES
Tra
inin
g A
dm
in F
ee I
ncre
ase
Act
ivit
y:
A06
3 C
lim
ate
Ch
ange
Mit
igat
ion
an
d A
dap
tati
on
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
Da
te R
un
: 9
/27
/20
18
7
:55
:00
AM
P
age
10
of
11
Page 20 of 51
Per
form
ance
Mea
sure
In
crem
enta
l E
stim
ates
Sta
te o
f W
ash
ing
ton
AB
S0
33
Age
ncy
: S
essi
on:
461
Dep
artm
ent
of E
colo
gy20
19 S
up
p
Act
ivit
y:
A06
4 M
anag
e S
olid
Was
te S
afel
y
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
LD
CD
ES
Tra
inin
g A
dm
in F
ee I
ncre
ase
Act
ivit
y:
A06
5 R
edu
ce P
ersi
sten
t, B
ioac
cum
ula
tive
, T
oxic
Ch
emic
als
and
Pro
mot
e S
afer
Con
sum
er P
rod
uct
s
No
mea
sure
s li
nked
to
dec
isio
n p
acka
geM
L9
ZR
ecas
t to
Act
ivit
yN
o m
easu
res
link
ed t
o d
ecis
ion
pac
kage
ML
DB
DE
S V
ehic
le F
leet
Co
sts
Da
te R
un
: 9
/27
/20
18
7
:55
:00
AM
P
age
11 o
f 11
Page 21 of 51
*** This page intentionally blank. ***
Page 22 of 51
State of Washington
Agency DP Priority (PL)
Session: 2019 Supp
ABS031
Agency: 461 Department of Ecology
(Lists only the agency Policy Level budget decision packages, in priority order)
PL-DA Lighthouse Litigation
Page 1 of 1 Date Run: 9/21/2018 8:10:10AM
Page 23 of 51
*** This page intentionally blank. ***
Page 24 of 51
Page 25 of 51
Page 26 of 51
Page 27 of 51
Page 28 of 51
Page 29 of 51
*** This page intentionally blank. ***
Page 30 of 51
Page 31 of 51
Page 32 of 51
Page 33 of 51
Page 34 of 51
Page 35 of 51
Page 36 of 51
Page 37 of 51
Page 38 of 51
Page 39 of 51
Page 40 of 51
Page 41 of 51
Page 42 of 51
Sta
te o
f W
ash
ing
ton
Su
mm
ariz
ed R
even
ue
by
Acc
oun
t an
d S
ourc
e
Ses
sion
: 20
19 S
up
p
Age
ncy
: 46
1 D
epar
tmen
t of
Eco
logy
Ver
sion
: S
2 -
Su
pp
lem
enta
l 20
19
Su
pp
ort
ing
Tex
t E
xclu
ded
Do
lla
rs i
n T
ho
usa
nd
s
All
Pro
gram
s at
th
e P
rogr
am L
evel
AB
S0
29
FY
2018
Main
ten
an
ce L
ev
el
FY
2019
FY
2019
FY
2018
Po
licy L
ev
el
An
nu
al
To
tals
FY
2018
FY
2019
Bie
nn
ial
To
tal
20R
- R
ad
ioacti
ve M
W A
cct
DB
- D
ES
Vehic
le F
leet
Costs
22
DC
- D
ES
Tra
inin
g A
dm
in F
ee I
ncre
ase
2
Tota
l - 0
294 -
Haza
rdous W
aste
Fees -
S 2
4
24
24
20R
- R
ad
ioacti
ve M
W A
cct
- S
tate
24
24
24
To
tal
- 20R
- R
ad
ioacti
ve M
W A
cct
24
24
24
Ag
en
cy:
461
EC
Y -
Sta
te 2
4
24
24
To
tal
- A
gen
cy:
461
EC
Y 2
4
Da
te R
un
: 9
/27
/20
18
7
:56
:33
AM
P
age
1 o
f 1
Page 43 of 51
*** This page intentionally blank. ***
Page 44 of 51
*
46
1 -
De
pa
rtm
en
t o
f E
co
log
yOFM
20
17
-19
Bie
nn
ium
Te
n Y
ea
r C
ap
ita
l P
lan
by P
roje
ct
Pri
ori
ty
Ve
rsio
n:
S2
20
19
Su
pp
lem
en
tal
Da
te R
un
: 9
/27
/20
18
7
:58
AM
Re
po
rt N
um
be
r: C
BS
00
1
Pro
ject
by A
gen
cy P
rio
rity
Pro
jec
t b
y A
cc
ou
nt-
EA
Typ
eE
sti
ma
ted
To
tal
Pri
or
Ex
pe
nd
itu
res
Re
ap
pro
p2
01
7-1
9
Ne
wA
pp
rop
20
17
-19
Es
tim
ate
d2
02
1-2
3E
sti
ma
ted
20
23
-25
Es
tim
ate
d2
02
5-2
7E
sti
ma
ted
20
19
-21
Pri
ori
tyC
urr
en
tE
xp
en
dit
ure
s
40
00
00
13
Wa
ter
Po
llu
tio
n C
on
tro
l S
tate
Ma
tch
1
35
5-1
St. B
ld C
on
st
Acct-
Sta
te 1
94
,00
0
19
4,0
00
35
5-B
St. B
ld C
on
st
Acct-
De
bt L
imit
19
4,0
00
P
roje
ct
To
tal:
19
4,0
00
To
tal A
cco
un
t S
um
mary
Es
tim
ate
d2
01
9-2
1E
sti
ma
ted
20
25
-27
Es
tim
ate
d2
02
3-2
5E
sti
ma
ted
20
21
-23
Re
ap
pro
p2
01
7-1
9P
rio
rE
xp
en
dit
ure
sE
sti
ma
ted
To
tal
Ne
wA
pp
rop
20
17
-19
Ac
co
un
t-E
xp
en
dit
ure
Au
tho
rity
Typ
eC
urr
en
tE
xp
en
dit
ure
s
35
5-1
St. B
ld C
on
st A
cct-
Sta
te 1
94
,00
0
19
4,0
00
35
5-B
St. B
ld C
on
st A
cct-
De
bt
Lim
it
19
4,0
00
To
tal
19
4,0
00
1
Page 45 of 51
*** This page intentionally blank. ***
Page 46 of 51
461 - Department of Ecology
*
2017-19 Biennium
Capital Project Request
OFM
Version: S2 2019 Supplemental
Project Number: 40000013
Date Run: 9/20/2018 12:25PM
Report Number: CBS002
Water Pollution Control State MatchProject Title:
Description
Starting Fiscal Year: 2018
Project Class: Grant - Pass Through1Agency Priority:
The Washington State Water Pollution Control Revolving Account or Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF), established under Chapter 90.50A RCW, provides low-interest loans to local governments, special purpose districts, and recognized tribes for high-priority water quality projects statewide. Ecology uses these funds to finance planning, designing, acquiring, constructing, and improving water pollution control facilities and for related nonpoint source activities that help meet state and federal water pollution control requirements. The annual CWSRF federal capitalization grant must be matched with 20 percent state funds. Ecology is requesting an additional $194,000 in the 2019 Supplemental Budget from the State Taxable Building Construction Account for the 20 percent state match required to receive an additional $970,000 in federal capitalization grant. The new appropriation is subject to the same proviso conditions as the original 2017-19 appropriation (Substitute Senate Bill 6090 Sec. 3024), and should be revised to: “$10,194,000 of the appropriation is provided solely as state match for federal clean water funds. $10,194,000 of the appropriation must be transferred into the water pollution control revolving account.” (STBCA)
Project Summary
Project Description
What is the proposed project? This request will provide the 20 percent state match required to receive an additional $970,000 in the federal capitalization grant provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in Federal Fiscal Year 2018 (FFY). Funding is allocated to states through a formula established in the Clean Water Act, and the calculation for FFY 2018 resulted in Washington receiving $970,000 more in federal funding than originally anticipated. The additional $194,000 state match must be deposited in the Water Pollution Control Revolving Account (WPCRA) according to federal and state regulations. What opportunity or problem is driving this request? A number of ongoing and emerging issues drive Washington’s water quality funding needs. Ecology works with local governments, special purpose districts, tribes, state and federal agencies, and other stakeholders to ensure financial assistance programs are meeting water quality needs by providing grants that address: - Aging and new wastewater treatment infrastructure. - Water quality cleanup plans required under the federal Clean Water Act. - Advanced wastewater treatment to meet designated uses of the receiving water. - Wastewater reclamation and reuse to address sustainability and resiliency. - Stormwater planning. - Non-point pollution from agricultural, forested, and urban areas. - Failing onsite sewage systems. - Water quality needs of financially distressed communities. Continued funding of the state match for the capitalization grant is critical for helping Washington’s local governments, special purpose districts, and recognized tribes update and improve water quality infrastructure and implement associated water quality projects focused on protecting and improving water quality and public health. CWSRF statutory requirements, administrative rule uses and limitations, and program and agency policy provide the framework for the Funding Guidelines, including: • Chapter 173-98 WAC, Uses and Limitations of the Water Pollution Control Revolving Fund • Chapter 70.146 RCW, Water Pollution Control Facilities Financing • Chapter 90.50A RCW - Water Pollution Control Facilities • Chapter 173-240 WAC, Submission of Plans and Reports for Construction of Wastewater Facilities • Chapter 90.46 RCW, Reclaimed Water Use • Administrative Requirements for Recipients of Ecology Grants and Loans (Yellow Book)
1Page 47 of 51
461 - Department of Ecology
*
2017-19 Biennium
Capital Project Request
OFM
Version: S2 2019 Supplemental
Project Number: 40000013
Date Run: 9/20/2018 12:25PM
Report Number: CBS002
Water Pollution Control State MatchProject Title:
Description What are the specific benefits of this project? The CWSRF loan program provides low-interest loans to local governments, special purpose districts, and recognized tribes for wastewater treatment, nonpoint source pollution control, and watershed and estuary management projects that achieve specific environmental and public health benefits, including: - Eliminating severe public health hazards and environmental degradation. - Achieving regulatory compliance with a consent decree, compliance order, Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL), or waste load allocation. - Restoring and protecting designated uses of Washington’s waters, such as drinking water, aquatic habitat, and shellfish harvesting. The economic value water quality infrastructure projects provide to the community and economy includes short-term benefits by supporting construction jobs and long-term benefits by funding sustainable clean water infrastructure that also supports growth and economic development. What are the effects of non-funding? If this request is not funded, $970,000 in federal capitalization grant funding would be lost, and the associated jobs, water quality, and public health improvements would not materialize. Why is this the best option or alternative? This request is for continuing state match support of the federal capitalization grant for the CWSRF loan program to help local governments with high-priority water quality projects throughout Washington. Ecology’s well established, accountable, and transparent water quality funding program is the best and most effective option available to distribute money for priority water pollution control projects on a statewide, competitive basis. The program considers legal mandates, local efforts, rate payer impacts, and evolving water quality priorities. How will clients be affected and services change if this project is funded? This request will allow public entities to proceed with planning, designing, acquiring, constructing, and improving water pollution control facilities and related nonpoint activities that help achieve state and federal water pollution control requirements. These improvements contribute significantly to protecting public health, restoring water quality statewide and in Puget Sound, and creating jobs and improving economic health. What is the agency’s proposed funding strategy for the project? The WPCRA and its dedicated revenue sources support the CWSRF loan program. Dedicated revenue sources include: - Yearly capitalization grants from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), authorized by Congress in the federal budget process (match is required for these new dollars). - State match (20 percent) – required under the federal Clean Water Act of 1987 – transferred into the fund from the State Taxable Building Construction Account. - Principal and interest repayments by loan recipients. - Interest earned on the fund balance by investments from the State Treasurer. The CWSRF loan program provides low-interest loans for high-priority water quality projects. To continue funding projects, Ecology ensures long–term health of the fund by managing the fund in perpetuity. Ecology bases interest rates on a percentage of the bond buyers' index, allowing sufficient capital to loan out for future water quality projects.
2Page 48 of 51
461 - Department of Ecology
*
2017-19 Biennium
Capital Project Request
OFM
Version: S2 2019 Supplemental
Project Number: 40000013
Date Run: 9/20/2018 12:25PM
Report Number: CBS002
Water Pollution Control State MatchProject Title:
DescriptionEcology typically awards half of the funds available for the biennium at the beginning of each fiscal year. Are FTEs required to support this project? No Capital FTEs are required for this request. How does the project support the agency and statewide results? This request is essential to implementing Ecology’s strategic priorities to Deliver Integrated Water Solutions and Protect and Restore Puget Sound because it continues funding projects for water pollution control infrastructure and projects that reduce nonpoint pollution and nutrient discharges. This request also supports the strategic priority to Reduce and Prepare for Climate Impacts. CWSRF funded projects often integrate climate resiliency and long-term sustainability. Examples are reclaimed water and water reuse facilities that help small communities be resilient and sustainable in water-short areas, and increased stream buffers and native vegetation to help address stream flow dynamics, temperature impacts, and carbon sequestration, in addition to improving water quality. This request provides essential support to the Governor's Results Washington Goal 3: Sustainable Energy and a Clean Environment by providing loans for high-priority water quality projects statewide so that CWSRF loan projects can reduce pollution of our lakes, rivers, streams, marine waters, estuaries, and groundwater so that local communities can help protect public health and the environment. It also supports Goal 2: Prosperous Economy by providing opportunities for quality jobs when a new wastewater system is constructed or an existing system is repaired or upgraded. State financial managers calculate that about 11 jobs in Washington are created for every $1 million spent for construction and design. The program also helps communities build well-functioning and sustainable clean water infrastructure that supports local economies. Also, this request supports efforts under the Governor’s Executive Order 18-02, Southern Resident Killer Whale Recovery, through funding projects that reduce toxic pollutant migration to Puget Sound. How will the other state programs or units of government be affected if this project is funded? Many local governments, special purpose districts, and recognized tribes propose important water quality projects that cannot be fully funded with one funding source. This is especially true for small, financially-distressed communities. Ecology works with recipients and other state and federal agencies to coordinate funding and technical assistance for water quality infrastructure projects. Together, the agencies collaborate and leverage their funds to meet the financial situation of the community. Many small communities with large–scale projects use multiple funding sources, including the CWSRF, Centennial Clean Water Program, Public Works Assistance Account, Department of Commerce, USDA Rural Development, and the State Tribal Assistance Grant Program. The lack of Public Works Assistance Account funding over the past few years has increased the demand and importance of CWSRF loan funding for local governments. Ecology is currently working with the Public Works Board, Department of Commerce, and Department of Health in an ongoing effort to improve and better collaborate and coordinate state financial assistance for water infrastructure in Washington. This effort, called the Sync System Improvement Team, is focused on identifying and implementing strategies and best practices for improving access to funding programs and improved value, outcomes, cost effectiveness, and sustainability of water infrastructure projects. This effort, in conjunction with ongoing CWSRF funding, supports improved statewide financial assistance and water quality project outcomes and also allows Washington to better serve small, financially challenged communities that receive CWSRF loan and Centennial Grant assistance. What is the impact on the state operating budget? None
Proviso
3Page 49 of 51
461 - Department of Ecology
*
2017-19 Biennium
Capital Project Request
OFM
Version: S2 2019 Supplemental
Project Number: 40000013
Date Run: 9/20/2018 12:25PM
Report Number: CBS002
Water Pollution Control State MatchProject Title:
DescriptionNote: Federal and state regulations require match funding be deposited directly into the WPCRA. The proviso language in SSB 6090 Sec. 3024 should be amended to include the additional $194,000: $10,194,000 of the appropriation is provided solely as state match for federal clean water funds. $10,194,000 of the appropriation must be transferred into the water pollution control revolving account.
Project Type
Grants
Public entities, local govt’s, special purpose districts, quasi-municipals, fed. recognized tribes.Grant Recipient Organization:
RCW that establishes grant: Chapter 90.50A RCW
Application process usedEcology manages an integrated annual funding approach using a joint application, evaluation, and rating and ranking process for the CWSRF, Centennial Clean Water Program, Stormwater Financial Assistance Program, and the Clean Water Act Section 319 federal grant program. The application period begins in August with applications due mid-October. Ecology staff screen, review, and rate and rank the applications from November through December. The evaluation and points are assigned according to an objective rating system that identifies the highest priority water quality needs statewide. In January, Ecology produces a combined draft project list for the Legislature to use during budget considerations. The list becomes final on July 1 or sooner, contingent on capital budget appropriations.
Growth Management impacts
N/A
Funding
Account TitleEstimated
TotalPrior
BienniumCurrent
Biennium ReappropsNew
AppropsAcct Code
Expenditures 2017-19 Fiscal Period
355-1 194,000 194,000 St. Bld Const Acct-State355-B St. Bld Const Acct-Debt Limit
194,000 0 0 0 194,000 Total
2019-21 2021-23 2023-25 2025-27
Future Fiscal Periods
355-1 St. Bld Const Acct-State355-B St. Bld Const Acct-Debt Limit
0 0 0 0 Total
Operating Impacts
No Operating Impact
4Page 50 of 51
Page
1 o
f 1
2019
Sup
plem
enta
l Bud
get R
eque
sted
Fun
d T
rans
fers
D
epar
tmen
t of E
colo
gy
Sep
tem
ber 2
018
Pur
pose
: Thi
s ta
ble
sum
mar
izes
Tre
asur
er fu
nd tr
ansf
ers
iden
tifie
d by
Eco
logy
for i
nclu
sion
in th
e 20
19 S
uppl
emen
tal B
udge
t,
Item
Bud
get R
efer
ence
Ac
coun
t Fro
m
Acco
unt T
o FY
18
Amt
FY 1
9 Am
t Bi
enni
um T
otal
Ex
plan
atio
n &
Sta
tuto
ry C
itatio
n 1
Capi
tal P
roje
ct
4000
0013
St
ate
Taxa
ble
Build
ing
Cons
truc
tion
Acco
unt (
355)
Wat
er P
ollu
tion
Cont
rol S
tate
Re
volv
ing
Acco
unt –
Fe
dera
l (72
7)
$1
94,0
00
$194
,000
Th
e W
ashi
ngto
n St
ate
Wat
er P
ollu
tion
Cont
rol
Revo
lvin
g Fu
nd (S
RF),
esta
blish
ed u
nder
Ch
apte
r 90.
50A
RCW
, im
plem
ents
the
stat
e’s
loan
pro
gram
to p
rovi
de lo
w- i
nter
est l
oans
to
pub
lic e
ntiti
es fo
r hig
h pr
iorit
y w
ater
qu
ality
pro
ject
s sta
tew
ide.
Tw
enty
per
cent
st
ate
mat
ch to
war
d fe
dera
l cap
italiz
atio
n do
llars
is re
quire
d. T
he st
ate
prov
ides
the
mat
ch fu
nds a
s fed
eral
dol
lars
are
act
ually
sp
ent.
Ecol
ogy
is re
ques
ting
an a
dditi
onal
$1
94,0
00 fr
om th
e St
ate
Taxa
ble
Build
ing
Cons
truc
tion
Acco
unt f
or th
e 20
% st
ate
mat
ch to
the
$970
,000
mill
ion
addi
tiona
l fe
dera
l cap
italiz
atio
n gr
ant r
ecei
ved
in S
tate
Fi
scal
Yea
r 201
9. T
he n
ew a
ppro
pria
tion
is su
bjec
t to
the
sam
e pr
oviso
con
ditio
ns a
s the
or
igin
al 2
017-
19 a
ppro
pria
tion
(Sub
stitu
te
Sena
te B
ill 6
090
Sec.
302
4), a
nd sh
ould
be
revi
sed
to:
“$10
,194
,000
of t
he a
ppro
pria
tion
is pr
ovid
ed so
lely
as s
tate
mat
ch fo
r fed
eral
cl
ean
wat
er fu
nds.
$10
,194
,000
of t
he
appr
opria
tion
mus
t be
tran
sfer
red
into
the
wat
er p
ollu
tion
cont
rol r
evol
ving
acc
ount
.”
Page 51 of 51
