Washington Accord Graduate Attributes: A Metric for the Quality of Engineering Education Worldwide...
-
Upload
abner-quentin-norman -
Category
Documents
-
view
274 -
download
1
Transcript of Washington Accord Graduate Attributes: A Metric for the Quality of Engineering Education Worldwide...
GCREAS International Conference 2014 1
Washington Accord Graduate Attributes:
A Metric for the Quality of Engineering Education Worldwide
Dr. Malcolm J. Reeves, FEC, FGC, P.Eng., P.Geo.Chair Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board 2012-
2014August 13, 2014
13 August 2014
GCREAS International Conference 2014
2
• The author has no formal connection with the International Engineering Alliance or the Washington Accord.
• The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author based on 17 years of experience gained on accreditation visits in Canada, Costa Rica, India, Korea, and the United States.
• The author has been a member of the Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board for 11 years and was Chair from 2012-2014.
Disclaimer:
13 August 2014
Outline
• Purpose• WA Background• WA Graduate Attribute exemplar
– Knowledge Base– Complex Problems
• Role of the GA exemplar– Not a standard but a metric
• Using the exemplar as a metric• What can we learn from applying a metric?
GCREAS International Conference 2014
313 August 2014
GCREAS International Conference 2014
4
• The purpose of this presentation is to discuss the concept of worldwide standards for quality of undergraduate engineering programs
• The purpose of accreditation is to serve the public and the profession by continually improving the quality of engineering education and engineering practice
Purpose
13 August 2014
GCREAS International Conference 2014
5
• The Washington Accord (WA) is an international mutual recognition agreement (MRA) that has been in place for more than 25 years and now has 17 signatories and 5 provisional members.
WA Background
13 August 2014
Principles of the MRA
• Accreditation criteria, policies and procedures of the signatories have been verified and judged comparable (“substantially equivalent”)
• Accreditation decisions made by one signatory are acceptable to the other signatories
• Make every effort to ensure that the registering / licensing body recognizes signatories’ programs
13 August 2014 GCREAS International Conference 2014
6
Benchmarking Agreement
• The signatories will identify and encourage the implementation of best practice for the academic preparation of engineers– by mutual regular monitoring on a six-year
cycle– regular communication and sharing of
accreditation information– sharing and maintaining lists of accredited
programs– invitations to observe accreditation visits and
meetings of any boards
13 August 2014 GCREAS International Conference 2014
7
GCREAS International Conference 2014
8
• Program criteria of signatories are benchmarked against a metric called the WA graduate attribute exemplar
• The exemplar includes: – a defined knowledge base (WK1-8), – a definition problem complexity (WP1-7) and – a defined set of graduate attributes (WA1-12)
• The knowledge base and definition of complexity serve to clarify and interpret the language of the attributes
Graduate Attribute Exemplar
13 August 2014
GCREAS International Conference 2014
9
Knowledge Base
13 August 2014
WK1: A systematic, theory-based understanding of the natural sciences applicable to the discipline
WK2: Conceptually-based mathematics, numerical analysis, statistics and formal aspects of computer and information science to support analysis and modelling applicable to the discipline
WK3: A systematic, theory-based formulation of engineering fundamentals required in the engineering discipline
WK4:Engineering specialist knowledge that provides theoretical frameworks and bodies of knowledge for the accepted practice areas in the engineering discipline; much is at the forefront of the discipline.
WK5: Knowledge that supports engineering design in a practice area
WK6: Knowledge of engineering practice and the practice areas in the engineering discipline
WK7: Comprehension of the role of engineering in society and identified issues in engineering practice in the discipline: ethics and the professional responsibility of an engineer to public safety; the impacts of engineering activity: economic, social, cultural, environmental and sustainability
WK8: Engagement with selected knowledge in the research literature of the discipline
A program that builds this type of knowledge and develops the appropriate attributes is typically achieved in 4 to 5 years of study.
Characteristics of Complex ProblemsWP1
WP2 Involve wide-ranging or conflicting technical, engineering and other issues
WP3Have no obvious solution - require abstract thinking, originality in analysis to formulate suitable models
WP4 Involve infrequently encountered issues
WP5Are outside problems encompassed by standards and codes of practice for professional engineering
WP6 Involve diverse groups of stakeholders with widely varying needs
WP7 Are high level problems including many component parts or sub-problems
Cannot be resolved without in-depth engineering knowledge at an advanced level
GCREAS International Conference 2014
1013 August 2014
GCREAS International Conference 2014
11
• Ability to deal with complex problems is explicitly specified for most (8 of 12) attributes in the WA exemplar
• The ability to address complex problems in their academic preparation is usually the distinguishing feature of a professional engineer relative to an engineering technologist or technician
• Complex problems are defined as requiring: – advanced engineering knowledge and– one or more characteristic from WP2 to WP7:
• Wide-ranging• Originality• Rarity• Outside codes• Diverse stakeholders• High-level
Significance of Complex Problems
13 August 2014
GCREAS International Conference 2014
12
• Each signatory defines the standards for against which engineering educational programs are accredited within their jurisdictions
• WA graduate attributes form a set of measurable outcomes
• WA graduate attributes are clear, succinct statements of expected capability (competencies)
• WA graduate attributes are intended primarily to assist signatories and provisional members to develop outcomes based accreditation criteria for use by their respective jurisdictions
Role of WA Graduate Attributes
13 August 2014
GCREAS International Conference 2014
13
• The WA graduate attributes do not constitute an “international standard” for accredited programs
• The WA exemplar is simply one way of organizing the competencies to be delivered in an undergraduate engineering program
• But it does provide a widely accepted common frame of reference within which bodies can describe the outcomes of substantially equivalent programs
Limitations of WA Graduate Attributes
13 August 2014
GCREAS International Conference 2014
14
Attributes
13 August 2014
WA1: Engineering Knowledge: Apply knowledge of mathematics, natural science, engineering fundamentals and an engineering specialization as specified in WK1 to WK4 respectively to the solution of complex engineering problems.
WA2: Problem Analysis: Identify, formulate, research literature and analyse complex engineering problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural sciences and engineering sciences. (WK1 to WK4)
WA3: Design: Design solutions for complex engineering problems and design systems, components or processes that meet specified needs with appropriate consideration for public health and safety, cultural, societal, and environmental considerations. (WK5)
WA4: Investigation: Conduct investigations of complex engineering problems using research-based knowledge (WK8) and research methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of information to provide valid conclusions.
WA5: Modern Tool Usage: Create, select and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern engineering and IT tools, including prediction and modelling, to complex engineering problems , with an understanding of the limitations. (WK6)
WA6: The Engineer and Society: Apply reasoning informed by contextual knowledge to assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to professional engineering practice and solutions to complex engineering problems . (WK7)
WA7: Environment and Sustainability: Understand and evaluate the sustainability and impact of professional engineering work in the solution of complex engineering problems in societal and environmental contexts. (WK7)
WA8: Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms of engineering practice. (WK7)
WA9: Individual and Team Work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in diverse teams and in multi-disciplinary settings.
WA10: Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the engineering community and with society at large, such as being able to comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions.
WA11: Project Management and Finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of engineering management principles and economic decision-making and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.
WA12: Lifelong Learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change.
GCREAS International Conference 2014
15
• The attributes provide a framework but do not set a rigid standard– a knowledge base is defined (but only in general terms)– problem complexity is defined but……
• Even clear and succinct statements of attributes leave room for legitimate interpretation
• The WA exemplar is something to measure ourselves against – a metric not a mandatory set of regulations
• We can perhaps agree that the WA exemplar is something we can all aspire to and use as a “yardstick” to measure our progress
The Exemplar is a Metric
13 August 2014
GCREAS International Conference 2014
16
• Do we all mean the same thing when we say: – “appropriate consideration”, – “apply reasoning”, – “function effectively”, – “communicate effectively”, – “commit to professional ethics and responsibilities”– “first principles of mathematics and natural sciences”?
• Can we group the components that make up the set of attributes differently?
– is twelve a magic number?• Can we use more or less attributes?• Can we eliminate some attributes?• Do we need to add more attributes?
– where do graduate attributes end ……– and professional competencies begin?
Interpretation and Ambiguity
13 August 2014
GCREAS International Conference 2014
17
• How do the criteria we use in our jurisdiction match up?
Using the Exemplar as a Metric
13 August 2014
GCREAS International Conference 2014
18
Are All Performance Levels Equal?
13 August 2014
En
gin
eer
ing
Kn
ow
led
ge
Pro
ble
m A
na
lys
is
Des
ign
Inve
sti
gat
ion
Mo
de
rn T
oo
l U
sa
ge
Th
e E
ng
ine
er
an
d S
oc
iety
En
vir
on
me
nt
an
d S
us
tain
ab
ilit
y
Eth
ics
Ind
ivid
ua
l a
nd
Tea
m W
ork
Co
mm
un
ica
tio
n
Pro
jec
t M
an
ag
em
en
t an
d F
ina
nc
e
Lif
elo
ng
Le
arn
ing
WA
1:
WA
2:
WA
3:
WA
4:
WA
5:
WA
6:
WA
7:
WA
8:
WA
9:
WA
10
:
WA
11:
WA
12
:
Exceeds x x x x
Fully meets x x x x
Marginally meets x x
Does not meet x x
Criteria Alignment Analysis
GCREAS International Conference 2014
19
• How do the criteria we use in our jurisdiction match up?
• How do we distribute time and resources toward the delivery each attribute?
Using the Exemplar as a Metric
13 August 2014
GCREAS International Conference 2014
20
Are All Attributes Equal?
13 August 2014
Pro
ble
m A
nal
ysis
Des
ign
Inve
stig
atio
n
Mo
der
n T
oo
l U
sag
e
Th
e E
ng
inee
r an
d S
oci
ety
En
viro
nm
ent
and
Su
stai
nab
ilit
y
Eth
ics
Ind
ivid
ual
an
d T
eam
Wo
rk
Co
mm
un
icat
ion
Pro
ject
Man
agem
ent
and
Fin
ance
Lif
elo
ng
Lea
rnin
g
WK1: Natural
Sciences
WK2: Mathematics
WK3: Engineering
Fundamentals
WK4: Discipline-
Specific
WA
2:
WA
3:
WA
4:
WA
5:
WA
6:
WA
7:
WA
8:
WA
9:
WA
10:
WA
11:
WA
12:
Exceeds x x x x x x x
Fully meets x x x x
Marginally meets x x
Does not meet x x
Criteria Alignment Analysis
WA1: Engineering Knowledge
GCREAS International Conference 2014
21
• How do the criteria we use in our jurisdiction match up?
• How do we distribute time and resources toward the delivery each attribute?
• How do our accredited programs perform for each attribute?
Using the Exemplar as a Metric
13 August 2014
GCREAS International Conference 2014
22
Is Acceptable Performance a Range?
13 August 2014
GCREAS International Conference 2014
23
• How do the criteria we use in our jurisdiction match up?
• How do we distribute time and resources toward the delivery each attribute?
• How do our accredited programs perform for each attribute?
• What changes might we want to consider ….or even encourage?
Using the Exemplar as a Metric
13 August 2014
GCREAS International Conference 2014
24
Is This Our Aspiration?
13 August 2014
GCREAS International Conference 2014
25
• Remember that the WA exemplar and our jurisdictional criteria are “living documents”
• They will change as we learn and adopt new technologies and practices in striving to improve the quality of our programs
• Standing still is not an option!
Final Thought
13 August 2014
GCREAS International Conference 2014
26
Questions?
13 August 2014
For more information:
Email: [email protected] Phone: 613-232-2474
*The terms P.ENG. and ING. are official marks held by the Canadian Council of Professional Engineers.
GCREAS International Conference 2014
2713 August 2014