Waikato Expressway: Hamilton Section Ruakura Interchange...Ruakura Interchange 1 2-31695.00 | August...
Transcript of Waikato Expressway: Hamilton Section Ruakura Interchange...Ruakura Interchange 1 2-31695.00 | August...
Waikato Expressway: Hamilton Section
Ruakura Interchange Assessment of Social Effects
Waikato Expressway: Hamilton Section
Ruakura Interchange
Assessment of Social Effects
© Opus International Consultants Ltd 2014
Prepared By Opus International Consultants Ltd
Marilyn Ford Wellington Environmental Office
Resource Management Planner L8, Majestic Centre, 100 Willis St
PO Box 12 003, Thorndon, Wellington
6144
New Zealand
Reviewed By Telephone: +64 4 471 7000
Wendy Turvey Facsimile: +64 4 499 3699
Principal Environmental Advisor
Date: 27 August 2014
Reference: 2-31695.00
Status: V.2.1
Approved for
Release By
David Heine
Hamilton Section Team Leader
Ruakura Interchange i
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
1 Contents
Executive Summary .................................................................................................... i
1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Purpose and Scope of Report ............................................................................................ 1
1.2 Assumptions and Exclusions in Assessment .................................................................... 1
2 Project Description ............................................................................................ 2
2.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................ 2
2.2 Background ....................................................................................................................... 2
2.3 Context .............................................................................................................................. 5
2.4 Proposal ............................................................................................................................ 8
3 Methodology ...................................................................................................... 9
3.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................ 9
3.2 Assessment Framework .................................................................................................. 10
3.3 Parties Affected by Social Impacts .................................................................................. 14
3.4 Identification of Effects ................................................................................................... 15
3.5 Rating of Effects .............................................................................................................. 16
3.6 Recommendation and Mitigation ................................................................................... 17
4 Community Profile ............................................................................................ 17
4.1 Overview .......................................................................................................................... 17
4.2 Surrounding Environment .............................................................................................. 17
4.3 Plans, Policies and Strategies .......................................................................................... 20
4.4 Community Facilities ...................................................................................................... 21
5 Summary of Community Engagement .............................................................. 23
5.1 Overview .......................................................................................................................... 23
5.2 Review of Previous Consultation .................................................................................... 23
5.3 Direct Social Investigation .............................................................................................. 24
6 Review of Relevant Technical Reports .............................................................. 25
6.1 Key Findings from Technical Reports Reviewed ............................................................ 25
7 Assessment of Effects ....................................................................................... 26
7.1 Overview .......................................................................................................................... 26
7.2 Regional Effects .............................................................................................................. 27
7.3 Local Effects .................................................................................................................... 30
7.4 Summary Tables.............................................................................................................. 47
8 Recommended Mitigation ................................................................................ 54
8.1 Summary of Proposed Mitigation Measures .................................................................. 54
8.2 Recommended Mitigation Measures .............................................................................. 55
Ruakura Interchange ii
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
9 Monitoring ....................................................................................................... 56
10 Recommendations and Conclusion .................................................................. 56
10.1 Recommendations .......................................................................................................... 56
10.2 Conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 57
Appendices
Appendix 1 – Review of Plans, Policies and Strategies
Appendix 2 – Community Facilities
Appendix 3 – Travel Patterns
Appendix 4 – Community Engagement
Appendix 5 – Review of Technical Reports
Ruakura Interchange i
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Executive Summary
Purpose of Report
This Social Impact Assessment identifies and assesses the social effects that may arise as a result of
the proposed alterations to the Hamilton Section designation with the proposed Ruakura
Interchange. This report will inform the Notices of Requirement (NOR) and Assessment of
Environmental Effects (AEE). The scope of this assessment includes:
Identification of a community of interest.
Identification of social amenities and facilities (such as community areas and places where
groups of people gather together).
An assessment of the relevant statutory and non-statutory documents to provide a background
of the political and community environment.
A review of feedback from the general consultation process.
Specific SIA engagement with community groups and representatives.
A review of other specialist inputs to the Project though a ‘social lens’.
An identification and assessment of the social effects of the Project against a social assessment
framework.
Identification of appropriate mitigation, avoidance or remedial strategies.
Methodology
This social impact assessment employs a framework for assessing social effect based on principles
from the International Association for Impact Assessment, taking into consideration the
requirements of the NZTA’s (draft) Z/19 standard. Effects are considered in relation to four main
themes: way of life; wellbeing; environment and amenity; and community.
The methodology includes a community profile, which describes the existing social environment
around the Project area. The community profile includes a description of the existing environment,
a description of key community facilities and amenities in the area, a discussion of travel patterns
and linkages in the area, and a review of policy and strategic documents
Social effects have been identified by reviewing a number of sources. The initial desktop review of
communities in the area, combined with aerial images and maps prepared by the project team
identified potential social effects, and community groups of interest to the assessment. Direct
observations of the Project area were carried out in a site visit providing context for the proposed
project. Telephone and face-to-face discussions were held with community groups to better
understand how the project may affect them. Other technical specialists’ assessments were reviewed
from a social perspective to further understand the potential effects of the project.
Identified effects were assessed according to the stated framework, and rated after qualitative
consideration of the effect, and its context, such as the severity and permanence of the effect. Effects
are either positive or negative, and each effect is rated either ‘significant’, ‘moderate’, ‘minor’, or
‘neutral’.
Ruakura Interchange ii
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Summary of Effects
The proposed Ruakura Interchange project is expected to result in very slight to significant positive
regional social effects and very slight to moderate positive local social effects. Positive effects as a
result of the project include:
Improved regional and local connectivity, enabling the of movements of people to and from
sources of education, recreation and employment.
Facilitated development of a regionally significant commercial facility.
Support for regional and city-wide community plans and aspirations.
Enhancement of local amenity of active transport networks for pedestrians and cyclists, which
has the potential to encourage greater use among local residents, as well as workers and students
in the area.
Identified negative effects as a result of the project include:
Potential negative effects to safety and amenity of the local road networks for pedestrians and
cyclists during construction, particularly in the location of schools and community facilities in
the Silverdale area.
Potential effects to neighbourhood amenity both during construction and once operational as a
result of changes in traffic volumes and visual changes.
Very localised severance of connectivity at Ruakura Road (Percival/Ryburn Road area) as a result
of partial road closure.
Small amounts of private property acquisition (partial acquisition and one dwelling to be
removed).
With proposed mitigations in place, negative effects can be managed to result in neutral/very slight
negative regional effects and very slight to minor negative effects at local levels.
Mitigation
The SIA identifies recommended mitigation measures to address identified social effects. In some
cases mitigation proposed by another technical specialist is considered sufficient to address social
concerns, but in other cases additional measures are recommended by the social impact assessor.
The project includes existing mitigation for potential safety and congestion effects, and there are a
number of conditions on the existing designation over the Waikato Expressway: Hamilton Section
which will address most of the identified social effects.
Additional mitigation has been proposed to conditions 2 and 9 of the existing designation, to include
certain community facilities and sites in notification related to the project, and in the community
liaison details. An additional provision for continued safe access for pedestrians and cyclists to the
CMP under condition 2.2 has also been recommended.
Conclusion
Negative effects of the project, with the exception of the localised effects of the closure of part of
Ruakura Road are able to be mitigated.
Identified local dis-benefits, or negative effects need to be considered in light of the designated
Expressway, and what would be a small scale change in comparison.
Overall, the social effects can be categorised as being positive at the regional level, with a mixture of
negative and positive effects at finer local levels.
Ruakura Interchange 1
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
1 Introduction
1.1 Purpose and Scope of Report
This Social Impact Assessment identifies and assesses the social effects that may arise as a result of
the alterations to designation proposed for the Ruakura Interchange (the Interchange) to the
Waikato Expressway: Hamilton Section. The SIA will inform the Notices of Requirement (NOR) and
Assessment of Environmental Effects (AEE). The scope of this assessment includes:
Identification of a community of interest.
Identification of social amenities and facilities (such as community areas and places where
groups of people gather together).
An assessment of the relevant statutory and non-statutory documents to provide a background
of the political and community environment.
A review of feedback from the general consultation process.
Specific SIA engagement with community groups and representatives.
A review of other specialist inputs to the Project though a ‘social lens’.
An identification and assessment of the social effects of the Project against a social assessment
framework1.
Identification of appropriate mitigation, avoidance or remedial strategies.
Preparation of a detailed management plan for social issues is not considered relevant for the
proposed works. Input to draft management plans is considered appropriate as the findings of other
technical reports are an important element of the social assessment.
Further details on the methodology used in the preparation of this assessment can be found in
section 3 of this report. The SIA is part of a wider suite of technical reports informing the AEE and,
while it overlaps with topics included in other technical reports, it examines these from a social
perspective.
1.2 Assumptions and Exclusions in Assessment
The following exclusions and assumptions apply to the scope of this report:
All assessments are based on the details of the Project as available at the time of writing this
report.
Social impacts associated with the existing designation are not considered, as these have been
addressed at an earlier stage in the project and appropriate mitigation measures established
through the designation conditions. Therefore the assessment focuses on the change in effects –
i.e. the effects above those which are already anticipated, and provided for, by the existing
designation.
Individual impacts on economics only (property value) have not been addressed as these are part
of the Public Works Act (PWA) process.
1 The assessment framework employed in this assessment is based on principles from the International Association for Impact Assessment, and also takes into consideration assessment frameworks used in other recent SIAs, and the requirements of the NZTA’s Z/19 standard.
Ruakura Interchange 2
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Cultural impacts affecting culture, land water and air have been addressed separately through
consultation with iwi and the Tāngata Whenua Working Group (TWWG) position statement is
relied on.
Health impacts are only considered with regard to individual and community stresses; personal
security; cycling and walking opportunities; healthy environment, and in consideration of other
specialist reports (such as air quality, noise and vibration).
A profile of the surrounding communities has been carried out, rather than a full demographic
profile, given the size and scale of the project.
Technical assessments have separately considered effects to air quality, noise, vibration and a
range of other technical specialist areas that are affected or require consideration in light of the
proposal. These assessments of effects have been carried out by the relevant technical specialist,
and their findings are relied on. Technical reports are reviewed in this assessment from a social
perspective only.
2 Project Description
2.1 Overview
The New Zealand Transport Agency (the Transport Agency) proposes to alter the existing
designation for the Hamilton Section of the Waikato Expressway (Hamilton Section) and obtain
additional resource consents from Waikato Regional Council (WRC) in order to construct, operate
and maintain the Ruakura Interchange and connecting roads. The Ruakura Interchange was omitted
from the recent round of alterations to the designation, whilst the Transport Agency awaited the
Board of Inquiry’s decision on the Ruakura Development Private Plan Change, by Tainui Group
Holdings.
2.2 Background
2.2.1 Roads of National Significance
In May 2009, the Government Policy Statement on Land Transport Funding (GPS) was released,
which identified seven Roads of National Significance (RoNS), which are considered by the
Government to be New Zealand’s most important transport routes requiring significant development
to reduce congestion, improve safety and support economic growth. The Waikato Expressway (the
Expressway) is one of the seven RoNS.
The purpose of listing particular roads as nationally significant was to ensure these priority roading
projects are fully taken into account in the development of the National Land Transport Programme.
The Government expects that planning for the future development of the land transport network
should reflect the importance of these roads from a national perspective and the need to advance
them quickly.
2.2.2 Waikato Expressway
The Expressway will extend from the Bombay Hills in the north to just south of Cambridge. The
Expressway has been divided into 12 sections. It is expected the Expressway will:
Ruakura Interchange 3
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Improve economic growth and productivity for Auckland, Waikato and Bay of Plenty through
more efficient movement of people and freight between Auckland, Hamilton, Tauranga and
Rotorua;
Improve the reliability of the transport network by providing a more robust and safer road
network between Auckland, Hamilton, Tauranga and Rotorua;
Reduce travel times between Waikato and Auckland; and
Support the growth strategy for the central Waikato.
2.2.3 Hamilton Section
The Hamilton Section is located on the eastern side of the city of Hamilton. The Hamilton Section
adjoins the recently completed Ngaruawahia Section to the north, and the existing Tamahere
Interchange to the south. It is approximately 22km in length. Figure 1 shows the scope of the
Hamilton Section.
Ruakura Interchange 4
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Figure 1: Proposed Scope of Works - Waikato Expressway Hamilton Section
Ruakura Interchange 5
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
2.3 Context
2.3.1 Current designation and resource consents
The Hamilton Section was first designated in 2005, following an appeal before the Environment
Court in 2004. In October 2013, the Transport Agency lodged Notices of Requirement (NORs) to
alter the designation in a number of discrete locations. Applications for resource consent to
construct, operate and maintain the Hamilton Section were lodged at the same time. The NORs and
resource consent applications were heard by independent Commissioners in April and May 2014.
The Commissioners’ decision on the resource consents was notified on 1 July 2014, granting all
consents applied for, subject to conditions. A recommendation from the Commissioners was released
on 30 June 2014 with respect to the NORs. The recommendation was that the NORs be granted
subject to a set of recommended conditions. On 8 July 2014, the Transport Agency accepted the
recommendation with only minor modifications. Two appeals have been made by submitters, one
in relation to Alteration U, and the other in relation to Alteration Z.
2.3.2 Ruakura Structure Plan (RSP)
Boundary changes between Hamilton City Council (HCC) and Waikato District Council (WDC) have
meant that a significant area of land at Ruakura is now within the jurisdiction of HCC. The
development of this land is identified in a number of high level documents including the Hamilton
Urban Growth Strategy, the Access Hamilton Transport Strategy and the Waikato Proposed Regional
Policy Statement.
To enable the progressive development of this area, the Ruakura Structure Plan (RSP) was developed
and notified as part of the Hamilton City Proposed District Plan (PDP) in December 2012. The RSP
(as notified) includes an inland port, freight and logistics hub and other industrial land. The inland
port as proposed in the RSP has an intermodal facility so that freight can be transferred to and from
road and rail. The RSP also provides for research and innovation activities, and residential areas for
an eventual population of approximately 1,800 households, including the development of a
neighbourhood centre.
Submissions and further submissions have been received on the RSP, however hearings and a
decision have been deferred, pending the outcome the Ruakura Private Plan Change (PPC).
2.3.3 Ruakura Private Plan Change
Tainui Group Holdings Limited (TGH) is the predominant landowner affected by the RSP. It was
identified that rules in the Hamilton District Plan: Waikato Section (as transferred over from the
WDC’s District Plan) prohibit any application being made for urban development within this area.
Given that the WDC rules are currently operative, they continue to apply until the PDP (including
the RSP) is made operative. Given the potential for lengthy delays, TGH have sought a PPC for what
is known as the Ruakura Development, through the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA). The
PPC affects some, but not all, of the land subject to the RSP.
The PPC does not re-zone any land, rather it proposes to adopt mechanisms providing an overlying
‘schedule’. This allows a range of activities to be undertaken in identified areas, as well as existing
rural activities.
The key aspects of the PPC are as follows:
Ruakura Interchange 6
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
A new ‘Schedule 25H Ruakura’ inserted into Chapter 25: Rural of the PDP, which provides a
Ruakura Logistics Area (incorporating the Inland Port), Ruakura Industrial Park Area,
Knowledge Area, Residential Areas and Open Space Areas along with indicative roads (refer to
Figure 1-2 below).
Amendments to the Prohibited Activity rules to enable the planning and development of the land
covered by Schedule 25H, including the future roading network.
On 31 July 2013, a ministerial direction was released, referring the PPC request to a Board of Inquiry
(BOI) which was held over a number of weeks during May/June 2014. On 5 August 2014, the BOI
issued its draft decision approving the PPC, subject to a number of amendments to the proposed
objectives, policies and rules, as they would apply to the Ruakura Development. Comments on the
draft decision close during the week commencing 1 September 2014, and a final decision is due on
11 September 2014.
The PPC will enable development to occur in the interim, but it is intended that the PPC will also be
incorporated into the framework of the PDP, once the PPC has been confirmed. Accordingly, the
RSP contained within the notified PDP is likely to be superseded by the Board’s decision on the PPC.
Ruakura Interchange 7
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Figure 2: Ruakura Schedule Area as approved by the BOI in its draft decision
Ruakura Interchange 8
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
2.4 Proposal
2.4.1 NOR – Alteration to Designation
The Transport Agency is now proposing to alter the designations for the Hamilton Section to include
a new interchange at Ruakura and encompass associated connecting roads (being the relocated and
the existing Ruakura Road). The scope of the designation sought is shown in Figure 3 below.
Figure 3: Diagram of Proposed Alteration to Designation
The altered designation includes the following:
» Widening of the existing Expressway designation to accommodate the Ruakura Interchange
ramps, connecting roundabouts, and stormwater wetland;
» Closure of the existing Ruakura Road either side of the Expressway and consequently shortening
of the proposed bridge over the East Coast Main Trunk (ECMT) rail line;
» Retention of the existing Ruakura Road either side of the closure at the Expressway in order to
provide continued property access to residents on Ruakura Road, including access to Percival
and Ryburn Roads as currently provided;
» Relocation of Ruakura Road between the Ruakura Road/Silverdale Road intersection and the
existing Ruakura Road near the Vaile Road intersection to connect with the proposed Ruakura
Interchange, including:
Existing Ruakura Road/Silverdale Road intersection closed, with Silverdale Road
terminating in a cul-de-sac (road retained for access) and creation of a new signalised
relocated Ruakura Road/Silverdale Road intersection that will also provide a key access
point to the Ruakura Development Logistics Area;
Ruakura Interchange 9
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
New relocated Ruakura Road/Existing Ruakura Road (west) priority controlled tee
intersection;
A signalised intersection along the relocated Ruakura Road to provide a second key access
point to the Ruakura Development Logistics Area;
Provision of a tee intersection where the relocated Ruakura Road meets the existing
Ruakura Road (east);
Upgrading the existing Ruakura Road, largely within its existing boundaries, between the new intersection with the relocated Ruakura Road (east) and the Ruakura Road/SH26 intersection (this will include shape correction of the roadway, carriageway widening, provision of a footpath and drainage improvements;
Extension of the designation to cover the existing Ruakura Road (from the intersection
with the relocated Ruakura Road up to SH 26) so upgrading works can be undertaken;
Provision for the relocated Ruakura Road to pass either over or under the Expressway; and
Provision for stormwater attenuation and disposal from the relocated Ruakura Road and
Ruakura Interchange.
Detailed designation plans are provided as Appendix C to the NOR.
Subject to the Ruakura Interchange proceeding, the proposed north facing ramps where the
Expressway passes under SH26 would not be required. Accordingly, a condition is proposed that
would result in the north facing ramps being removed from the Waikato Expressway, once the
Ruakura Interchange is under construction.
The relocated Ruakura Rd west of the Expressway will become a local road, whereas the link formed
by the relocated and existing Ruakura Roads east of the Expressway as far as State Highway 26 will
become state highway.
3 Methodology
3.1 Overview
This section outlines the methodology employed for this SIA. The methodology for carrying out this
assessment follows a process which can be broken down into the following stages:
Assessment framework
In order to reflect developments in social impact assessment, a review of methods used in recent
social assessment was carried out to confirm and refine the assessment framework used. This
assessment considers social effects in relation to four main themes: way of life; wellbeing;
environment and amenity; and community.
The assessment framework employed in this assessment is based on principles from the
International Association for Impact Assessment, and also takes into consideration assessment
frameworks used in other recent SIAs, and the requirements of the NZTA’s Z/19 standard.
Ruakura Interchange 10
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Parties affected by social impacts
In assessing the social effects of the Project, the affected parties are differentiated to illustrate the
scale of the affect. The types of affected party are: Directly Affected; Neighbours and; Wider
Community of Interest.
Community profile (existing social environment)
A community profile was prepared which describes the existing social environment, and provides a
description of key community facilities and amenities in the area, and a discussion of travel patterns
and linkages in the area .
Policy and strategic documents
A review of the policy and strategic documents was carried out to provide a background of the
political and community environment.
Identification of effects
Identification of social effects has come from a number of sources, and these include direct
observations of the Project area, discussions with community groups and with other technical
specialists, and desktop reviews of communities in the area. The assessment of effects has been
carried out according to the framework developed above, and the Project scope (described above in
1.1 of this assessment).
Rating of effects
The ratings are arrived at after qualitative consideration of the effect, and its context, such as the
severity and permanence of the effect. Effects may be positive or negative, and each effect is rated
either ‘significant’, ‘moderate’, ‘minor’, or ‘neutral’.
Recommendation and mitigation
Consideration of effects from a social perspective incorporates many other specialist areas. In some
cases mitigation proposed by another technical specialist is considered sufficient to address social
concerns, but in other cases additional measures are recommended by the social impact assessor.
Each of these stages in the process of carrying out this assessment are described in more detail below.
3.2 Assessment Framework
To develop a framework for assessing effects of the Project, the IAIA framework was used as a
starting point. The IAIA2 describes social impact as:
“Analysing, monitoring and managing the intended and unintended social consequences, both
positive and negative, of planned interventions (policies, programs, plans, projects) and any
social change processes invoked by those interventions”.
2 www.iaia.org/
Ruakura Interchange 11
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
The IAIA further states3 that a way of conceptualising social impacts is as changes to one or more of
the following:
People’s way of life – that is, how they live, work, play and interact with one another on a day-to-
day basis;
Their culture – that is, their shared beliefs, customs, values and language or dialect;
Their community – its cohesion, stability, character, services and facilities;
Their political systems – the extent to which people are able to participate in decisions that affect
their lives, the level of democratisation that is taking place, and the resources provided for this
purpose;
Their environment – the quality of the air and water people use; the availability and quality of
the food they eat; the level of hazard or risk, dust and noise they are exposed to; the adequacy of
sanitation, their physical safety, and their access to and control over resources;
Their health and wellbeing – health is a state of complete physical, mental, social and spiritual
wellbeing and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity;
Their personal and property rights – particularly whether people are economically affected, or
experience personal disadvantage which may include a violation of their civil liberties; and
Their fears and aspirations – their perceptions about their safety, their fears about the future of
their community, and their aspirations for their future and the future of their children.
This way of conceptualising social effects provides a sound, recognised framework for assessing
social effects. It has been recently used successfully on a New Zealand RoNS project (Peka Peka to
North Ōtaki Expressway), and can be adapted to incorporate key aspects of NZTA guidelines. This
approach is also consistent with recent social impact assessments undertaken for the Waikato
Expressway: Hamilton Section project, and the Ruakura Development private plan change, and is
considered appropriate for the Ruakura Interchange context. In developing the assessment
framework for this SIA, consideration also was taken of the NZTA’s Z/19 NZTA Environmental and
Social Responsibility Standard (Draft)4, which provides high level guidance through the steps of
initiating and carrying out projects, and directs specialists to specialist assessment guides and
templates for their respective technical discipline5. This assessment therefore takes into account the
steps and inclusions of the NZTA’s draft Guide to assessing social effects for state highway projects
(the Draft Guide).
The G1.4 guidance note of the Draft Guide6 defines a social effect as; “something that is experienced
or felt (perceived or actual) by people (individuals, or in groups or organisations) as a consequence
of a development or intervention.”
3 Vanclay, Frank, ‘Social Impact Assessment International Principles’, IAIA Special Publication Series, No.2, May 2003, (downloaded October 2013 from: http://www.iaia.org/publicdocuments/special-publications/sp2.pdf) 4 Available from: http://hip.nzta.govt.nz/technical-information/social-and-environmental/environment-and-social-responsibility-standard. Note that the NZTA’s Z/19 NZTA Environmental and Social Responsibility Standard (Draft) replaces the existing Minimum Standard Z/19- Social Environmental Management, PSF/13 Social and Environmental Management Form; PSG/13 Social and Environmental Management; PSG/12 Urban Design Professional Services Guide; and Minimum Standard 2/4 - Contractor's Social and Environmental Plan. 5 Refer to 'Detailed Steps: Pre Implementation' on the NZTA webpage: http://hip.nzta.govt.nz/technical-information/social-and-environmental/environment-and-social-responsibility-standard. 6 NZTA, ‘Guide to assessing social effects for state highway projects’, received via personal communication, dated June 2014, page 24.
Ruakura Interchange 12
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
With regard to effects themselves, the guide notes that these can be positive or negative, and refers
to the RMA definition of effect provided in Section 3 of the Act; that effects can mean:
“(a) any positive or adverse effect; and (b) any temporary or permanent effect; and (c) any
past, present, or future effect; and (d) any cumulative effect which arises over time or in
combination with other effects— regardless of the scale, intensity, duration, or frequency of
the effect, and also includes (e) any potential effect of high probability; and (f) any potential
effect of low probability which has a high potential impact”
The Draft Guide7 also refers to the following list as potential areas for (positive or negative) social
impacts:
» way of life
» cohesion, stability, character, services and facilities in a community
» biophysical environment and resources
» quality of the living environment and amenity
» family, community, and social networks
» health and wellbeing
» material wellbeing, personal and property rights
» fears and aspirations
» culture and identity
» political system.
The above types of social effects are considered to be addressed through the IAIA categories in the
following way:
NZTA Draft Guide
IAIA Concepts Assessment Framework
way of life People’s way of life – that is, how they live, work, play and interact with one another on a day-to-day basis;
Way of Life: Impacts on accessibility, connectivity, patterns of living and mobility; Changes to ways of walking & cycling and changes to public transport.
cohesion, stability, character, services and facilities in a community
Their community – its cohesion, stability, character, services and facilities;
Community: Impacts on educational facilities; Impacts on community areas and sites; Impacts on and accessibility to commercial areas.
biophysical environment and resources
quality of the living environment and amenity
Their environment – the quality of the air and water people use; the availability and quality of the food they eat; the level of hazard or risk, dust and noise they are exposed to; the adequacy of sanitation, their physical safety, and their access to and control over resources;
Environment and Amenity: Noise, dust, visual changes.
7 ibid.
Ruakura Interchange 13
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
family, community, and social networks
Their community – its cohesion, stability, character, services and facilities;
Community: Impacts on educational facilities; Impacts on community areas and sites; Impacts on and accessibility to commercial areas.
health and wellbeing Their health and wellbeing – health is a state of complete physical, mental, social and spiritual wellbeing and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity;
Wellbeing: Changes to wellbeing; Safety.
material wellbeing, personal and property rights
Their personal and property rights – particularly whether people are economically affected, or experience personal disadvantage which may include a violation of their civil liberties; and
Community: Impacts on people’s property and neighbourhoods.
fears and aspirations
Their fears and aspirations – their perceptions about their safety, their fears about the future of their community, and their aspirations for their future and the future of their children.
Community: Impacts on community plans and aspirations.
culture and identity Their culture – that is, their shared beliefs, customs, values and language or dialect;
political system. Their political systems – the extent to which people are able to participate in decisions that affect their lives, the level of democratisation that is taking place, and the resources provided for this purpose;
In adapting the IAIA framework, a number of aspects have not been adopted for this assessment.
Political systems, the wider political system and ability to participate democratically in society are
included in both the IAIA framework and in the NZTA’s Draft Guide, however they are not expressly
included in this Project. Due to the democratic political context in New Zealand, it is considered that
changes to political systems are not appropriate for this assessment. Consideration of cultural
impacts has only been considered to a limited extent in this report as a tāngata whenua position
statement has been specifically prepared to addresses these issues. Health impacts are considered
with regard to individual and community stresses; personal security; cycling and walking
opportunities; healthy environment, and in consideration of other specialist reports (such as air
quality, noise and vibration). In addition to the above, the NZTA’s Draft Guide refers to ‘biophysical
environment and resources’, which are not assessed here. Elements of the physical environment
relating to amenity are assessed, however other aspects of the biophysical environment are
considered to be addressed in the assessment of ecological effects.
3.2.1 Types of Social Effects
This assessment framework is based on the above sources, and considers the following types of social
effects:
Way of Life
» Impacts on accessibility, connectivity, patterns of living and mobility.
» Changes to ways of walking & cycling and changes to public transport.
Wellbeing
Ruakura Interchange 14
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
» Changes to wellbeing.
» Safety.
Environment and Amenity
» Noise, dust, visual changes.
Community
» Impacts on people’s property and neighbourhoods.
» Impacts on educational facilities.
» Impacts on community areas and sites.
» Impacts on community plans and aspirations.
» Impacts on and accessibility to commercial areas.
3.2.2 Stages for Impact Assessment
There are four potential stages where social and community effects can occur during a project. These
are:
1. planning / consenting;
2. construction;
3. operation; and
4. closure (if relevant).
This assessment focuses on the planning/consenting (detailed design), construction and operational
phases of the Project.
3.3 Parties Affected by Social Impacts
As social impact assessments relate to individuals and communities, the scale of an effect may vary
depending on whether it affects an individual, or a large group. In assessing the social effects of the
Project, the affected parties are differentiated to illustrate the scale of the affect. The types of affected
party are:
Directly Affected – those whose properties which are physically crossed by the Project, or are
immediately adjacent to it.
Neighbours – those who are not directly affected but are potentially affected by proximity (i.e. by
visual, noise or traffic effects).
The Wider Community of Interest – all those with an interest in the Project greater than the
general public.
The term ‘Wider Community of Interest’ is intended to recognise individuals and community groups
who may have a specific interest in the project, such as users of regional facilities who regularly travel
through the area. However, given the focus on those areas of the Project where significant changes
are proposed, the community of interest is much more limited to the directly affected and
neighbouring properties around the change. This is particularly so where the key social effects of the
change relate predominantly to changes in the local environment.
This SIA is undertaken within the context of prior projects and plans developing in the area,
including the Waikato Expressway: Hamilton Section, the Ruakura Development (private plan
change), and the proposed Hamilton City District Plan (incorporating the Ruakura Structure Plan).
Various options and proposals have been explored over a number of years, and different efforts at
Ruakura Interchange 15
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
community engagement have been made, including open days, circulation of newsletters, and
landowner meetings. In some cases, residents groups have formed in response to development in
the area, creating new local interest groups. These parties were treated as stakeholders in the Project.
Specific engagement with identified community groups was sought for this assessment and their
feedback has informed the assessment of social effects.
3.4 Identification of Effects
In order to identify the social effects of the Project, information has been derived from a number of
sources which were then compiled and assessed against the framework. These sources include
primary data from direct observation and face to face meetings, information from desktop reviews,
and other technical specialists. Sources of information used for this social impact assessment are
described further below.
3.4.1 Community Profile
A community profile was prepared to describe the existing social environment around the Project
area. It includes a description of key community facilities and amenities in the area, a discussion of
travel patterns and linkages in the area, and a review of strategic and policy documents. Information
sources for the community profile included8:
Site visit (undertaken in June 2014), carried out in order to understand the nature and extent of
the study area, to develop and refine the community of interest, and to gain an understanding of
how the community may be affected by the proposal.
An initial walk and drive around the surrounding communities to become familiar with
community, recreational and educational facilities within the area, location of residences and
movement paths.
Council policies, strategies and plans to understand community aspirations and the context for
the Project (refer to Appendix 1 of this report).
Maps and aerial photographs, prepared by the Project team to assist with identifying adjoining
land uses.
Census data on means of travel to work, to provide a ‘snapshot’ of patterns of movement in the
area.
3.4.2 Community input and consultation
Information from the community of interest was sought in the following ways:
Review of the summary of community consultation contained in the Notices of Requirement.
Review of previous documentation and reports relevant to the Project to bring the knowledge
gained from the field work into perspective, including -
» Public feedback provided gathered during the most recent open day held on the Project (May
2013).
» Minutes of meetings between other members of the project team and representative of
community groups and businesses.
» Submissions and subsequent submissions on the Ruakura Development (PPC)
8 Note that demographic data / data from the 2012 Census of Population and Dwellings has not been used in this assessment, as the project area is so small and defined.
Ruakura Interchange 16
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Project briefing held in Hamilton with members of the Project team on 27th June 2014.
Face to face interviews and telephone discussions with representatives of residents groups and
community facilities.
3.4.3 Technical assessments
Due to the wide range of factors which influence social effects, input from other technical specialists
has been sought in preparation of this assessment. Technical notes prepared for the NoR lodged in
February 2014 have been reviewed, as well as recently updated and supplementary technical reports.
Discussions with the project team, and other specialists have been carried out to discuss social
implications of different areas such as: noise, and traffic and transportation effects.
For the purposes of the SIA the findings and conclusions of these assessments are relied on, however
in some cases further mitigation has been recommended in order to address intangible or perceived
effects from a social perspective.
This SIA is therefore a part of an integrated and defined process that has drawn on a variety of inputs
including stakeholder and community consultation and technical specialist assessments which have
informed the assessment and recommended mitigation measures.
3.5 Rating of Effects
In the assessment of effects and in accordance with the NZTA ‘Standard for social impact assessment
of state highway projects’9, each effect has been given an overall rating. Effects may be positive or
negative, and each effect is rated either ‘significant’, ‘moderate’, ‘minor’, or ‘neutral’.
The ratings are arrived at after qualitative consideration of the effect, and its context. In applying
the overall rating of the effects, consideration was given to:
the approximate severity of impact;
the magnitude of effect;
the permanence of the effect;
voluntariness of exposure;
distribution of the effect;
the likelihood of the effect occurring;
cumulative effects of an option (if any); and
ease of mitigation.
The rating is designed to provide direction to the project team as to the magnitude of the effect and
the degree of mitigation required.
The rating takes into account these mitigation measures which are already included in the Project.
In some cases, no additional mitigation will be necessary, however in others additional measures
may be considered necessary from a social perspective.
9 NZTA, ‘Guide to assessing social effects for state highway projects’, received via personal communication, dated June 2014, page 31.
Ruakura Interchange 17
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
3.6 Recommendation and Mitigation
As the Project design has been carried out as an iterative process, in some cases mitigating measures
are already incorporated, and may address part, or all of the social effect identified.
In some cases this mitigation may also address the social effect, however if further mitigation is
recommended, this is in order to address intangible or perceived effects from a social perspective.
In these cases, the additional social mitigation is identified as such.
4 Community Profile
4.1 Overview
This section outlines the existing social environment within which the Project will take place. It
provides a description of the surrounding environment, key community facilities and amenities in
the area, and a discussion of travel patterns and linkages in the area.
4.2 Surrounding Environment
4.2.1 Existing Environment
The Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) requires an assessment of the actual and potential effects
on the environment of allowing the activity (s104(1)(a)). This report forms part of that assessment.
Consideration therefore needs to be given to what defines the existing environment, as this is what
the effects of the proposal will be assessed against.
4.2.1.1 Waikato Expressway
The Hamilton Section of the Waikato Expressway designations pass to the east of Hamilton City in
a generally north-south direction and enable the construction of a four-lane Expressway and
associated on/off ramps to connect with the local road network (excluding the Ruakura Interchange).
The development of the Expressway is also supported by a number of consents granted by the WRC.
For the purpose of assessing this NOR, the Expressway as currently designated is considered part of
the existing environment.
4.2.1.2 West of the Expressway
The land immediately to the west of the Expressway is currently zoned Rural in the Hamilton District
Plan: Waikato Section. This area adjoining the Expressway is in pasture, with scattered dwellings
and farm buildings. The Waikato University is located to the west of Silverdale Road, and is
surrounded by residential development. There is also residential development to the east of
Silverdale Road, which juts out towards the Expressway, and is bounded by a gully (Nevada Road).
North of Ruakura Road is an area of land zoned Country Living, which contains a cluster of
approximately 30 rural residential dwellings.
The environment immediately to the west of the Expressway is subject to a PPC, which a BOI has
approved in its draft decision. Consideration of this NOR by the territorial authority should be in
the context of the future development enabled by the PPC. The need for the Ruakura Interchange is
a direct result of development occurring in this area in accordance with the PPC. Without the PPC
Ruakura Interchange 18
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
proceeding, the Agency would revert back to the approved north facing ramps at SH26, unless an
alternative justification was provided for establishing an interchange at Ruakura.
It is reasonable to assume that the existing environment for the purpose of assessing the effects of
this NOR will consist of the land use activities indicated in Figure 2 of this report, and supported by
the BOI decision. The BOI has already heard evidence in relation to the associated effects of these
land use activities and their ruling on the PPC has taken such effects into consideration. It is for this
reason that for the purposes of the overall effects assessment the PPC has been adopted as the
existing environment.
4.2.1.3 East of the Expressway
The land to the east of the Expressway is zoned Rural in the Waikato District Plan. The portion of
land between the ECMT and Davison Road is characterised by large open paddocks and scattered
buildings, including some dwellings. From Davison Road south, there is significantly more rural-
residential development. The Dairy NZ/LIC site is located on the corner of Ruakura Road and SH26.
Ruakura Road itself is identified as an Arterial Road in the Waikato District Plan (WDP). The
function of Arterial Roads is described in the WDP as roads that10:
» Form a strategic network of regional importance
» Provide for the collection and distribution of goods significant to the regional economy
» Rural roads that typically provide for more than 2,500 vehicle movements per day
» Include rest areas; and
» The through traffic function predominates.
4.2.2 Patterns of Mobility
4.2.2.1 Travel to work
While a full demographic profile has not been carried out for this assessment, in order to provide a
snapshot of patterns of movement through the area, census tables specific to how people travel to
work were downloaded from the Statistics New Zealand website (further information is contained in
Appendix 3 of this report). In comparing percentages of residents who reported travelling by motor
vehicle with active transport modes and public transport, we can see that in the Census Area Unit
(CAU) to the east of the Project (Eureka), very few residents (less than 3%) reported using active
transport modes (walking or cycling), or public transport to travel to work. Nineteen percent of
residents in the Eureka CAU reported that they worked from home.
West of the proposed Interchange there were also low percentages of active transport users in the
Newstead CAU. Active transport and uptake of public bus transport was highest in the Silverdale
CAU; where 2.9% reported that they cycled to work, 5.8% walked or jogged and 3.5% were passengers
on a public bus.
Over 50 % of residents in all three CAUs closest to the Project area reported driving either their own,
or a company-owned vehicle to work.
Figure 4 below shows the location of the CAUs referred to above.
10 Refer Table 7 of Appendix A: Traffic (Waikato District Plan, April 2013).
Ruakura Interchange 19
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Figure 4:Census Area Units around the Ruakura Interchange
4.2.2.2 Pedestrian facilities in the area
Much of the land surrounding the location of the proposed Interchange is (currently) rural, and there
are few formed footpaths, or crossing facilities for pedestrians.
To the west of the designated Expressway, footpaths on Ruakura Road extend only as far as Knighton
Road, although there are paths within the university grounds along the northern boundary with
Ruakura Road up to the corner of Silverdale Road. There is footpath along the full length of
Silverdale Road along the west side (the university side), and a footpath on the eastern side extends
from the local shops near Nevada Road, to the Bishop Edward Gaines Trust Homes (approximately
60 Silverdale Rd). There are two zebra crossings over Silverdale Road; one opposite the local shops,
and one opposite Silverdale Normal School.
Ruakura Rd to the east of the designated Expressway does not have any formed footpaths at all. On
Vaile Road there is a small section of footpath between Newstead Country Preschool and
approximately 130 Vaile Road, which connects to an off-road walking path leading to Newstead
Eureka
Newstead
Silverdale
University
Ruakura Interchange 20
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Model Country School and Hamilton Park Cemetery on SH26/Morrinsville Road. SH26 also does
not have any formed footpaths.
4.2.2.3 Public transport routes in the area
Given that the predominance of settlement and community facilities is to the west of the area, most
public transport routes are to the west and few public transport routes pass through the Project
area11. To the west of the proposed Interchange, public buses travel along Rukakura Road and down
Silverdale Road in both directions. State Highway 26 is also used by some regional services travelling
east to Morrinsville and Paeroa. Further detail and public transport route maps are contained in
Appendix 3.
4.2.2.4 Summary
From the data summarised above, private motor vehicle travel appears to be the predominant mode
of transport for residents in the CAUs closest to the proposed Interchange. South-west of the project
area, in the Silverdale CAU, uptake of walking, cycling and public transport is higher. Few existing
bus services are routed through the project area.
4.3 Plans, Policies and Strategies
A review of plans, policies and strategies related to the Project was carried out to provide context for
the assessment, and to confirm the appropriateness of the assessment framework. The RMA 1991
includes people, communities, social and cultural conditions all within its definition of ‘environment’
to be considered in planning matters.
There are a number of statutory and non-statutory plans and policies prepared that provide high-
level context for the proposal. Strategies, plans and policies prepared by the community (or with
input from the local community) can provide a good indication of the social matters of importance
to the community, and of any key community aspirations.
The following documents have been reviewed (details of this summary are included in Appendix 2
of this report):
Waikato Regional Long Term Council Community Plan 2012-2022
Regional Policy Statement for the Waikato Region
Proposed Regional Policy Statement for the Waikato Region (decisions version, November 2012)
Future Proof Growth Strategy and Implementation Plan (2009)
Waikato Regional Land Transport Strategy 2011-2041
Waikato Regional Walking and Cycling Strategy 2009-2015
Hamilton City Long Term Council Community Plan 2009-2019
Access Hamilton Strategy
Hamilton Social Wellbeing Strategy
Hamilton Urban Growth Strategy
Hamilton City Proposed District Plan
Waikato District Long Term Plan 2012 – 2022
Waikato District Plan
11 Downloaded from : http://www.busit.co.nz/Hamilton-routes/, on 23/07/2014.
Ruakura Interchange 21
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Newstead Community Plan
In reviewing the above plans, policies and strategies several themes emerged which are closely
related to the overall social assessment framework, and the different types of social effects which will
be assessed. These themes included; heritage and cultural values, local and regional accessibility
and connectivity, the design of built environments, provision of safety and walking and cycling
facilities, and encouragement of economic growth. Key among these themes were the following:
The importance of the quality of the environment and therefore peoples’ experience and
appreciation of it, and their sense and pride of place.
The importance of air, soil and water quality to peoples’ health, well-being, livelihoods and
recreational aspirations.
The importance of infrastructure for providing connections to employment, education, access to
essential services and recreation, and also for contributing to economic growth.
The importance of walking and cycling as modes of transport that are accessible, safe, enjoyable,
and contribute positively to public health.
4.4 Community Facilities
As the land around the Interchange is currently fairly rural; the majority of community facilities are
located on the western side of the Hamilton Expressway designation. There is generally a
concentration of community facilities between Tramway Road and Heaphy Terrace, and between
Grey Street and Peachgrove Road/Galloway Street. Given the rural context of the receiving
environment there are few community facilities in the immediate vicinity of the proposed
interchange, especially to the east.
Aerial maps and a detailed list of community facilities around the Interchange are provided in
Appendix 2 of this report.
4.4.1 Specific Community Facilities of Interest
Given the specific scope of the Project, effects on local communities and community facilities are
likely to be experienced within a close proximity to the Interchange. Community facilities that are
nearest to the Interchange are mainly schools, churches and early childhood education facilities
located along Silverdale Road.
Given their close proximity to the proposed Interchange, the following community facilities have
been identified as being of particular interest for this social assessment and direct engagement with
these parties has been carried out. Further information about these facilities and the engagement
carried out is provided in section 5 of this report.
Te Kura Kaupapa Māori o Tōku Māpihi Maurea
TKKM o Tōku Māpihi Maurea is a kura kaupapa māori school located at 137 Silverdale Road,
Rukaura. TKKM o Toku Mapihi Maurea is a full primary school (catering for years 1-8) with a roll
of approximately 96 pupils.
Waikato University
Waikato University has a range of campus facilities located between Knighton Road and Silverdale
Road in Ruakura, including a Kohanga Reo preschool kohanga Reo O Nga Kuaka) at 159 Silverdale
Ruakura Interchange 22
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Road, and a satellite campus at the western end of Ruakura Road. Silverdale Road, Ruakura Road
and SH26 are key approach routes to the university12.
Newstead Country Preschool
Newstead Country Preschool located at 92 Vaile Road, Newstead. The preschool is a mixed all day
standalone childcare centre licensed for 37 children (15 under two). It caters for infants (6-18
months), and children in age groups; 18 months-3 years; and 3-5 years13.
Silverdale Normal School
Silverdale School is a local primary school located at 62 Silverdale Road, Silverdale. The school is a
contributing primary (catering for years 1-6) with a roll of approximately 244 pupils. The school has
a local catchment of pupils, and the interchange passes through the middle of this catchment area.
Catchment areas for Silverdale Normal School and other local schools are shown in the figure below.
Figure 5: Silverdale Normal School catchment area
St Matthew’s Catholic Church
St Matthew’s Catholic Church is located at 58 Silverdale Road, next to Silverdale Normal School. St
Matthew’s is linked to St Peter Chanel church in Te Rapa, and holds services on Monday mornings,
Thursday mornings and Sunday mornings14 meetings are also held in the parish lounge on Sunday
afternoons and alternating Tuesday evenings.
12 Refer to Appendix 2 for a map of the university campus. 13 From Newstead Country Preschool webpage; http://newsteadcountrypreschool.co.nz/?page_id=4 14 Mass timetables available on St Matthew’s website: http://www.saintmatthews.co.nz/mass-times.html
Ruakura Interchange 23
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
4.4.2 Other Community Groups
The communities around the Ruakura Interchange have experienced the development of different
projects occurring in the area over a number of years. These projects have acted as a catalyst for the
formation of specific community interest groups which may also have an interest in the outcomes of
the Ruakura Interchange project. A number of groups have submitted and given evidence on the
recent Ruakura Development project; identifying interests and concerns specific to the local area.
Local community groups which may also have an interest in the Ruakura Interchange project are:
Newstead Residents Association
Ruakura Residents Group
Silverdale Residents Group
In addition to the community facilities indicated above, concerns from the Newstead, Ruakura and
Silverdale residents groups were identified as being of particular interest for this social assessment,
and direct engagement with these parties has been carried out.
Other potential groups and facilities of interest to this assessment, were identified when reviewing
other technical reports, or in meeting with community groups, including Dairy NZ and Livestock
Improvements Corporation (LIC)15, and Willowbrook Park16.
Direct engagement, or review of engagement by other members of the project team was carried out
with these parties. Community engagement is summarised in the following section of this report.
5 Summary of Community Engagement
5.1 Overview
Information from the community of interest was sought through reviewing records of previous
engagement and consultation carried out for the project, and through direct contact with community
groups. Information gathered from these sources is summarised under the headings below.
5.2 Review of Previous Consultation
A review of previous consultation carried out on the Project was carried out to provide context for
the existing social environment of the Project, and to assist in the identification of community groups
and facilities which may be affected by the proposed Interchange. This review also helped to identify
where further, targeted social engagement would be beneficial. Sources reviewed included:
The summary of community consultation contained in the Notices of Requirement17.
Community feedback provided by the public at open days held May 2013.
Minutes of meetings between (other members of) the project team and:
» Private land-owner located at 11 Davison Road;
» LIC and Dairy NZ;
15 Located at the corner of Ruakura Road and SH26/Morrinsville Road 16 A wedding and accommodation venue to be opened at 15 Vaile Road in 2015. Refer to Appendix 2 and Appendix 4 for more information. 17 Notice of Requirement to Alter the Designation over the Waikato Expressway, Hamilton Section (February 2014), section 5
Ruakura Interchange 24
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
» Newstead Community; and
» Ruakura residents.
Submissions and subsequent submissions on the Ruakura Development (PPC).
Information from the review of previous consultation can be found in Appendix 4 of this assessment.
The key themes identified in this review included the following issues.
Issues relating to connectivity, access and mobility through the area were raised in community
feedback at the May 2013 open days, as were potential visual impacts from the elevated
Interchange.
Potentially relevant concerns which were raised in submissions on the Rukaura Development
included:
» visual impacts, and increased lighting/glare;
» air quality from vehicle emissions (mainly from the proposed inland port);
» increased traffic volumes on local roads; and
» cumulative effects from uncertainty over the projects and potentially from multiple
construction efforts in close proximity / time period.
Concerns were also expressed about severance; two submissions from the Percival/Ryburn
Road area specifically expressed concerns about the severance of Ruakura Road, and the effect
of this on local connectivity.
Concerns raised in meetings held by the project team focussed on the potential for increased
traffic volumes on local roads and congestion at locations such as near LIC and intersections
(Vaile Road and SH26/Morrinsville Road).
5.3 Direct Social Investigation
In order to complement the community engagement already carried out by the Project, and to better
understand potential issues related to the community groups and facilities identified in 4
Community Profile, direct social investigation was carried out. The direct social investigation
involved the following steps:
Project briefing and site visit to the Project area on 27th June 2014
Community meetings and discussions to address specific social issues, including:
» Discussion with Newstead Country Pre-school.
» Discussion with St Matthew’s Catholic Church.
» Meeting with Waikato University.
» Meeting with Ruakura Residents Group.
» Meeting with Silverdale Residents Group.
» Meeting with Newstead Residents Association.
» Discussion with TKKM o Toku Mapihi Maurea.
» Discussion with Newstead Model Country School.
» Discussion with Silverdale Normal School.
» Review of meeting notes with Dairy NZ / LIC.
» Discussion with Willowbrook Park.
Ruakura Interchange 25
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Details on the feedback provided during direct social investigation can be found in Appendix 4 of
this report. A wide variety of potential effects from the Interchange project were been raised in these
discussions including:
Effects of increased traffic on pedestrian safety (along the northern end of Silverdale Road,
Ruakura Road east and Vaile Road).
Volumes of construction vehicles, and the routes taken during the construction of the
Expressway.
Effects of increased road-noise and vibration on the amenity of private residences and properties
(particularly along Ruakura Road).
Other effects to amenity of properties and neighbourhoods as a result of visual changes (views
and lighting).
In addition to potential effects, groups have also expressed the importance of; participation in
decision-making, effects on local ecology, and mentioned options that they would like to see
explored, including:
alternative local access from SH26,
local roading arrangements between Ruakura and Hillcrest,
private access to Ruakura Road, and
improved information and communication on the project in general.
Issues and concerns raised in community meetings and discussions outlined above are considered,
in concert with findings from other technical experts, in the assessment of effects contained in
section 7 of this report.
6 Review of Relevant Technical Reports
A suite of technical reports have been prepared to help inform the Notice of Requirement to alter the
designation over the Hamilton Section of the Waikato Expressway. Of these, the following technical
reports have been reviewed ‘through a social lens’ as relevant to assessing the potential social effects
of the proposed Interchange:
transport and traffic
landscape visual and urban
noise
archaeology
air quality
vibration
position statement prepared by tāngata whenua
6.1 Key Findings from Technical Reports Reviewed
The above technical reports have been reviewed as part of the assessment of potential social effects
of the proposed Interchange. The findings of these reports inform the social effects assessed in the
Ruakura Interchange 26
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
following section. Details of this review are provided in Appendix 5 of this report18. The key
findings are summarised as follows:
The assessment of traffic effects found that there would be improvements to network efficiency;
intersection performance; safety for vehicles turning into LIC; and facilities for pedestrians, and
some negative effects to property access for residents on Ruakura Road and increased trip
distances for residents near Percival and Ryburn Roads.
The landscape, visual and urban design assessment found that there would be minor-moderate
negative landscape and visual effects in some locations as a result of the Interchange, and minor
to moderate positive effects on urban design. The assessment concluded that the option to build
the Expressway over the realigned Ruakura Road would be preferable in terms of urban design
outcomes, and further that detailed mitigation to the west of the Expressway would need to be
addressed in future once the Ruakura Masterplan has been prepared.
The noise assessment found that there would not be significant operational, or construction-
related noise effects related to the Interchange over and above those assessed for the Expressway
itself, and management of noise effects with the proposed designation alterations will be of the
same scale and nature as for the existing designation.
The archaeological assessment found that the study area did not hold any known archaeological
or historic values and no specific modifications or mitigations are proposed by the archaeological
specialist.
The air quality assessment did not identify any adverse effects to air quality as a result of the
operation of the Interchange, and concluded that with mitigation measures implemented
through a CMP, effects of construction dust emissions to air quality would be minor.
The vibration assessment proposes no specific mitigation for operational traffic-induced
vibrations as a result of the Interchange, and notes that from a vibrations perspective, there is no
difference between the ‘over’ and ‘under’ interchange options. It concludes that construction-
related effects will be minor or less, if appropriately mitigated through the implementation of a
CVMP.
Tāngata whenua identified benefits, and some negative effects on ecological areas and wāhi tapu,
noting that the restoration and management approach of the NZTA is welcomed.
The findings of all technical reports outlined above are accepted from a social perspective, and are
relied on for the purposes of this social impact assessment.
7 Assessment of Effects
7.1 Overview
This section considers the potential social effects that may result from the alterations to designation
proposed for the Interchange
Potential and actual effects identified through these sources were then assessed against the SIA
framework adopted for this review (detailed in section 3 of this report). The analysis below follows
the structure of the assessment framework, which is:
18 As noted in 1.2, the review of technical assessments was carried out based on the information available at the time of writing the report. Reports prepared after the review was carried out will supersede the summaries in Appendix 5.
Ruakura Interchange 27
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Way of Life
Impacts on accessibility, connectivity, patterns of living and mobility.
Changes to ways of walking & cycling and changes to public transport.
Wellbeing
Changes to wellbeing.
Safety.
Environment and Amenity
Noise, dust, visual changes.
Community
Impacts on people’s property and neighbourhoods.
Impacts on educational facilities.
Impacts on community areas and sites.
Impacts on community plans and aspirations.
Impacts on and accessibility to commercial areas.
In the assessment of effects and in accordance with the NZTA ‘Standard for social impact assessment
of state highway projects’19, each effect has been given an overall rating. Effects may be positive or
negative, and each effect is rated either ‘significant’, ‘moderate’, ‘minor’, or ‘neutral’.
The ratings are arrived at after qualitative consideration of the effect, and its context. In applying
the overall rating of the effects, consideration was given to:
the approximate severity of impact;
the magnitude of effect;
the permanence of the effect;
voluntariness of exposure;
distribution of the effect;
the likelihood of the effect occurring;
cumulative effects of an option (if any); and
ease of mitigation.
Effects below have been discussed in terms of whether they are affecting a specific local area or
community, multiple local areas, or are regional effects.
7.2 Regional Effects
Regionally, the Interchange is expected to provide a greater opportunity for surrounding localities
to enjoy the benefits of the Waikato Expressway; Hamilton Section, in terms of regional connectivity,
resilience and facilitation of economic development in the Waikato region.
19 NZTA, ‘Guide to assessing social effects for state highway projects’, received via personal communication, dated June 2014, page 31.
Ruakura Interchange 28
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
7.2.1 Way of Life
7.2.1.1 Accessibility, Connectivity and Patterns of Mobility
Construction of the Interchange and connecting local roads will be carried out concurrently with the
Hamilton Section of the Waikato Expressway. Given the scale of the proposed project, any negative
effects to connectivity and accessibility during construction are not expected to be experienced at a
regional level.
The project will replace the designated half diamond interchange at SH26 with a full diamond
interchange at the realigned Ruakura Road. This will improve accessibility in north and southbound
directions on and off the Waikato Expressway (Hamilton Section), which has been identified as “the
number one strategic transport project f0r the Waikato region”20.
The project facilitates regional movements of freight and people due to its proximity to the proposed
Inland Port, Waikato University and the Hamilton CBD. It will also encourage heavy freight vehicles
to use the Expressway rather than local roads, improving their amenity for local traffic.
The operational effects of the project on regional accessibility, mobility and patterns of movement
are considered to be moderate positive.
7.2.2 Wellbeing
7.2.2.1 Changes to Wellbeing and Safety
There are not expected to be any effects to wellbeing or safety at a regional level during the
construction or operation of the Interchange. Potential construction-related effects on wellbeing and
safety are discussed in relation to local effects below.
7.2.3 Environment and Amenity
7.2.3.1 Noise, Dust, Visual Changes
Construction of the Interchange project will be carried out concurrently with that of the Waikato
Expressway. There are not expected to be any changes in regional environment or amenity as a result
of the Interchange during construction, or once operational.
7.2.4 Community
Community effects to people’s property and neighbourhoods are discussed below in terms of local
effects.
7.2.4.1 Impacts on Educational Facilities, Community Areas and Sites
The proposed Interchange project will make changes to the local roading environment at the
northern corner of Waikato University’s main campus, which is a regionally significant educational
facility in the vicinity of the proposed Interchange.
Detailed construction methodology is not available at the time of writing this assessment, as this will
be the responsibility of the constructor to prepare. Despite this, potential construction-related
20 Refer to policy 8.16 of the Waikato Regional Transport Strategy (2011-2041).
Ruakura Interchange 29
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
effects would include movements of construction vehicles creating noise disturbance and road
congestion in the vicinity of the University, and affecting access for staff and students.
Condition 2 of the existing designation requires the preparation and implementation of a
Construction Management Plan (CMP), which will need to address routes of construction vehicles,
and is required to be certified by council. Traffic management, safe access arrangements, routes and
timing of construction vehicle movements are all expected to be able to be managed through the
implementation of the CMP.
Additionally, the noise assessment has not identified construction-related noise effects over and
above those expected and designated for the Expressway this is not considered to constitute a social
effect.
Therefore the construction-related impacts on regional educational facilities would be neutral/very
slight.
The connection of the new section of Ruakura Road to the Interchange will provide improved
connections between the Waikato Expressway and the University. This will benefit the regional
connectivity of Waikato University to the north and south; facilitate the movement of students and
staff within the Waikato region; and maintain existing regional connections to the east of the
designated Expressway.
Improvements to the regional connectivity (outlined above) have the potential to improve access to
other educational facilities, parks and recreation centres, and sources of employment in the wider
area (refer to Appendix 2 for details of community facilities), which are not directly affected by the
proposal.
Once operational the project is considered to have a moderate positive effect on educational facilities
and community sites at a regional level.
7.2.4.2 Impacts on Community Plans and Aspirations
The Interchange project is providing for an efficient connection between the proposed Ruakura
Development, the Hamilton Section of the Waikato Expressway, and the ECMT railway, enabling the
development of the inland port at Ruakura proposed Tainui Group Holdings as part of their private
plan change21. It also improves the connectivity of Hamilton City to the Waikato Expressway. This
project has been developed in partnership with tāngata whenua, and will maintain an ongoing
relationship through the Hamilton Section TWWG22.
For the above reasons, the Ruakura Interchange benefits regional plans and aspirations of people in
the Waikato region by contributing to community outcomes identified in the Waikato Regional
Council’s LTP, in particular by working together in partnership with tāngata whenua and through
providing for reliable, efficient transport infrastructure.
21 This development has been described by Tainui as being critical to their aspirations of providing for the future wellbeing of their tribe (Statement of evidence of the Honourable Koro Wetere on behalf of Tainui Group Holdings Limited, 26 February 2014, paragraphs 15-18, Statement of evidence of Parekawhia McLean on behalf of Tainui Group Holdings, 26 February 2014, paragraphs 24, 30). As the major landholder in the vicinity of the Ruakura Interchange, Tainui Group Holdings are a part of the community, and are directly impacted by the project. 22 Note that ongoing relationship is required by condition 9c of the existing designation.
Ruakura Interchange 30
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
The Interchange also supports desired community outcomes stated in Hamilton City’s Long Term
Council Community Plan (2009-2019), through developing integrated transport systems, and
facilitating the development of Hamilton as the economic hub for the Waikato Region.
As the project provides connections to regional transportation infrastructure necessary for the
operation of the Ruakura inland port, there is a significant benefit to Tainui stated aspirations.
The project is considered to have a significant positive effect on community plans and aspirations at
a regional level.
7.2.4.3 Impacts on and Accessibility to Commercial Areas
As noted above, there are not expected to be any regional construction-related effects to patterns of
mobility. Given the scale of the proposed project, it is not expected that there would be any
construction-related effects at a regional level, on commercial areas, or access to them.
The Interchange project will replace the designated half-diamond interchange at SH26 with a full
diamond interchange at the realigned Ruakura Road. This interchange will provide improved
regional accessibility in north-south directions via the Hamilton Section of the Waikato Expressway,
enabling improved access to sources of employment and trade.
The proposed Interchange provides for access between the Waikato Expressway and the proposed
Ruakura Development including an inland port, which will become a regionally significant
commercial facility.
The above changes benefit regional accessibility to commercial areas and sites and the project is
considered to have a moderate positive regional effect.
7.3 Local Effects
Local effects are assessed below, according to whether they are general local effects, or effects specific
to one of the localities shown in Figure 6 below. Specific localities considered are; Percival/Ryburn
Road, Newstead, SH26 and Silverdale/Hillcrest.
As noted above, detailed construction methodology is not available at this stage for assessment, but
typical effects of construction activities have been considered 23 . With the exceptions of some
construction-related vibration effects and potential for disruption to public transport, effects related
to the construction of the proposed Interchange are mainly considered in terms of general local
effects, rather than specific localities.
23 Noting that the main source of construction traffic will be earthworks carried for the construction
of the Expressway, .which will be managed through conditions on the existing resource consent.
Ruakura Interchange 31
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Figure 6: Local Areas
7.3.1 Way of Life
7.3.1.1 Accessibility, Connectivity and Patterns of Mobility
General Local Effects
Typical construction-related effects to accessibility, connectivity and patterns of mobility can
include:
Construction vehicle movements causing congestion and disruption to local motor-vehicle
traffic
Construction activity causing changes to access in and out of properties and route disruption.
As outlined at 7.2.4.1, potential disruption to local traffic and accessibility are expected to be
managed through the preparation and implementation of the CMP.
The full interchange at Ruakura provides access on and off the Expressway in north and southbound
directions. Local residents travelling south will be able to access the Expressway at Ruakura instead
of travelling south to the southern interchange, and people travelling from the south will be able to
exit the Expressway at Ruakura, instead of getting off at the southern interchange, or Greenhill, and
travelling back on local roads.
The Interchange will result in improved north and south connectivity for all local areas, and is
assessed to have a moderate positive effect on local connectivity.
Percival Road Area
Percival/Ryburn
Newstead
Silverdale/Hillcrest
Sh26
Ruakura Interchange 32
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
The proposed Interchange will close a section of the existing Ruakura Road at the point where the
Expressway passes over it. This means that some residents in the Percival Road area will not be able
to travel east on the existing Ruakura Road, and residents on the existing Ruakura Road to the east
of the Expressway will not be able to travel west on the existing Ruakura Road.24
Continued east-west access across the Expressway will be available via the proposed new section of
Ruakura Road connecting with the interchange. As outlined in the traffic and transportation
assessment, the impact of this change in access will mean that trips in motor vehicles will take an
approximate additional 145 seconds from residences west of the Expressway travelling east, and 120
seconds from residences to the east of the Expressway travelling west towards Hamilton City25.
This is considered a minor negative effect, as it is very specific in location, and continued east-west
access is maintained.
Silverdale / Hillcrest Area
The project will make changes to the local roads, including the realignment of Ruakura Road in
order to connect to the Interchange. The alteration of the existing Ruakura Road will ensure that
east-west connections are still in place, and this is not expected to have an effect on the
connectivity of this locality.
At the western end of the new Ruakura Road there is an altered intersection with Silverdale Road,
where the northern end of Silverdale Road becomes a cul-de-sac, and a new connection links to
Silverdale Road approximately 230m to the south. This section of Silverdale Road provides access
to Waikato University’s Facilities Management building; Gate 3a carpark and the Don Llwellyn
Sports Complex.
It is not expected that this change in configuration would have a negative effect on connectivity in
this area, or significantly change the way students and staff come and go from this part of the campus.
Continued access to and from the university and facilities (such as the Don Llwellyn Sports Complex)
will still be available via Silverdale Road.
It is noted that in discussions with Waikato University, a desire was expressed for the provision of a
slip-way / local access, directly onto the section of Ruakura Road that runs along the university’s
northern boundary (controlled to prevent rat-running), however project traffic engineers have
advised that this would not be supported from a safety perspective26.
As a result of the project, general traffic volumes are expected to increase along the northern end of
Silverdale Road, and to decrease at the southern end, and heavy vehicle movements are expected to
decrease at both ends27. These changes are not expected to impede the day to day movements of
local residents, or visitors to the university or other sites in the Silverdale area. It is noted that the
general local improvements to connectivity outlined above are expected to apply to this locality.
Changes to connectivity and accessibility specific to this locality are expected to be neutral.
24 Access for two properties at the north-eastern ends of Percival and Ryburn Roads respectively has changed as part of the Expressway, and continued access via a new local connection underneath the Expressway is part of the existing designation. 25 Refer to section 6.2 of ‘Ruakura Interchange Assessment of Traffic Effects’, 19 August, 2014. 26 Telephone discussion with Mike Meister, 22/08/2014. 27 Refer to section 4 of ‘Ruakura Interchange Assessment of Traffic Effects’, 19 August, 2014.
Ruakura Interchange 33
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Newstead Area
Similar to the Silverdale area, the alteration of the existing Ruakura Road is not expected to have an
effect on the connectivity of this locality, as the realignment of Ruakura Road will ensure that east-
west connections are still in place.
As a result of the Interchange, there are expected to be increases in traffic volumes along Ruakura
Road (east of the Expressway)28. Concerns have been expressed29 about potential for this to cause
congestion along local roads, and conflicts with traffic movements in and out of LIC at busy times.
In response to potential safety effects from increased traffic volumes at this location, the project will
include a wide painted median for vehicles to use when making a right-hand turn from Ruakura
Road into the LIC site. For private residences along Ruakura Road, it is considered 30 that while
increased traffic volumes will be noticeable, it will not impede local mobility or access to and from
private properties.
With mitigations in place, the effect on the Newstead locality is considered to be neutral/very slight.
State Highway 26/Morrinsville Road
The proposed project will replace the designated half-diamond interchange at SH26 with a full
diamond interchange at (the realigned) Ruakura Road. As a result, access to the Expressway
travelling north, and access from the Expressway travelling south will be removed at this location.
People coming from and travelling to Morrinsville Road will have to travel additional distance to
access the Ruakura Interchange in order to make these movements.
Motorists will, however, have improved southbound access onto the Expressway through the
additional on-ramp. North bound traffic on the Expressway will be able to exit closer to SH26. East-
west connections and movements will not be altered as a result of the Interchange.
Overall the effect of the Interchange on accessibility, connectivity and mobility near the SH26 is
considered to be neutral.
7.3.1.2 Walking, Cycling and Public Transport
General Local Effects
Detailed construction methodology is not available at this stage of the project, however typical
construction-related effects to accessibility, connectivity and patterns of mobility can include:
changes to the safety and amenity of walking and cycling routes as a result of movements of
construction vehicles; and
temporary changes to bus stop locations and end user facilities.
Without the construction details, assessment of the potential social impacts of these works cannot
be assessed, and the existing condition 2 of the designation is relied on. This condition requires that
potential disruption to local traffic and accessibility is managed through a Construction Management
Plan (CMP).
28 Ibid. 29 Meeting with Newstead Residents Association, 17 July, 2014. 30 Refer to section 6.1 of ‘Ruakura Interchange Assessment of Traffic Effects’, 19 August, 2014.
Ruakura Interchange 34
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
It is further recommended that the existing condition specifying the inclusions of the CMP (condition
2.2) is amended to specifically provide for continued access for pedestrians and cyclists throughout
the construction process.
The Ruakura Road Interchange includes modified connections to the existing roading network which
will incorporate a shared-use concrete pedestrian and cycle path of 3.0m width along relocated
Ruakura Road between Silverdale Road and Vaile Road. The path shall be designed to be safe and
accessible and enable pedestrians and cyclist to cross the ramps associated with the Ruakura
Interchange. In contrast, the existing Ruakura Road does not have any footpaths. The project will
add 1.5m sealed shoulders along both sides of the existing Ruakura Road (between Vaile Road and
SH26). A further 1.5m concrete footpath will be located on the eastern side of Ruakura Road between
Vaile Road and SH26. Additionally, there will be provision within the designation for a 3m shared
pathway alongside the Expressway31.
The detailed design of the new/realigned roads is not available at this stage of the project, but will be
carried out in accordance with Austroads and Hamilton City Council guidelines for footpath design,
curb set-downs etc, and is expected to be safe and accessible to people with limited mobility.
These changes are considered to provide a moderate positive effect to walking and cycling facilities
for all local areas, and will enhance the amenity of the area for pedestrians and cyclists.
Note that no changes to the routes of existing local and regional public transport routes are expected
as a result of the Interchange (refer to routes shown in Appendix 3).
Percival Road Area
The project proposes to close a section of Ruakura Road under the Waikato Expressway. This is the
main change that will affect walking and cycling in this locality. This will affect travel for local
residents only from two specific locations in the Percival Road area. For people walking or cycling
from Ruakura Road east of the Expressway to Ruakura Road west of the Expressway, this increase
will mean that trips would be approximately 2.7km longer32. For people walking or cycling from
Ruakura road east of the Expressway to Hamilton City, trips would be approximately 1km longer
Any physical mitigation of this effect to local patterns of movement would be very difficult to achieve
safely33.
This effect has been assessed as minor negative, but it is noted that this is specific to a very localised
group of residents.
Silverdale / Hillcrest Area
The project includes changes to the road environment in this locality including the realignment of
Ruakura Road and alterations to the northern end of Silverdale Road (described above in 7.3.1.1).
31 Note that while this is not being formed by the project, this will be available to connect to regional cycling networks in the future. 32 Refer to section 6.2 of ‘Ruakura Interchange Assessment of Traffic Effects’, 19 August, 2014. 33 The purpose of the closure of this portion of Ruakura Road is to provide for a rail siding to the inland port proposed as part of the Ruakura Development, and any continued pedestrian or cycling connection would need to cross the rail-line safely.
Ruakura Interchange 35
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
In this area, there are existing pedestrian and public transport amenities which are utilised by
students of nearby schools34. Waikato University have indicated that over 90% of enrolled students
live off campus, and many come from the Silverdale/Hillcrest area35, and representatives of local
schools have expressed concern about the potential for construction traffic and increased traffic
volumes to affect the safety of pupils.
Census data (refer to 4.2.2.1 in this report) indicates that higher percentages of people travelling to
work in this area use active transport modes than in the other localities considered.
There is the potential for construction activities to disrupt staff and students as they come and go
from educational facilities in this area (refer to Appendix 2 for a list of these facilities), as well as
local residents who walk or cycle to work.
The scale of construction vehicle movements in this location would be small compared with the
activity of the existing designation, and potential effects are expected to be appropriately managed
through the preparation and implementation of the CMP.
It is recommended as a further measure that educational and community facilities along Silverdale
Road are kept informed of activities and potential disruption throughout the construction period
(refer to 7.3.4.2 for details).
With the above mitigations in place, effects to walking and cycling during construction are expected
to be neutral.
Once operational the project will result in increased local facilities for pedestrians and cyclists. Given
the number of educational and community facilities in this location which attract visitors, and the
slightly higher percentages of walkers and cyclists in this area (than in other parts of the project
area36); these changes could benefit the Silverdale area in particular. These potential positive effects
are discussed further in terms of ‘Wellbeing’ below.
Newstead Area
There are few existing facilities for pedestrians and cyclists in this locality (refer to 4.2.2.2). The
Project will include new amenities for pedestrians and cyclists, including a shared-use pedestrian
and cycleway between Silverdale Road and Vaile Road, a footpath along Ruakura Road between Vaile
Road and SH26, and 1.5m sealed shoulders along both sides of Ruakura Road between Vaile Road
and SH2637.
Community groups38 have mentioned the recreational use of walking routes near LIC in Newstead.
The above changes will enhance this recreational walking route, and will improve the safety and
amenity for cyclists through the area.
34 Discussion with TKKM o Toku Mapihi Maurea, 23 July, 2014, and Silverdale Normal School, 28 July, 2014. 35 Meeting with Waikato University, 17 July, 2014. 36 Refer to 4.2.2.1, and Appendix 4 of this report. 37 Verbal correspondence from project team 22 August, 2014. 38 Refer to Appendix 4, Community Engagement.
Ruakura Interchange 36
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
There will be increased traffic volumes along Ruakura Road, which may make crossing the road more
difficult for pedestrians, but given the roading enhancements mentioned above, the overall effect for
walking and cycling in this location is expected to be moderate positive.
State Highway 26/Morrinsville Road
The Ruakura Interchange is proposed to replace the designated SH26 interchange. It will not make
any specific alterations to the existing facilities for pedestrians or cyclists, or alter the routes for
existing regional bus services.
In this location traffic volumes are expected to decrease as a result of the project, which may result
in a minor improvement to the amenity of the existing roads for pedestrians and cyclists.
The project is considered to have a neutral/very slight positive effect in this location.
7.3.2 Wellbeing
7.3.2.1 Changes to wellbeing
General Local Effects
Due to multiple proposed changes in the local area (including the Interchange project) there is the
potential for uncertainty regarding the plans for the area to result in a cumulative effect on the
wellbeing of property owners neighbouring the designation.
At a general local level, this potential effect is mitigated by condition 9 on the existing designation,
which requires the provision of notifications and contact details for the project liaison to residents
bordering the designation.
Effects experienced in terms of specific localities are discussed in further detail below.
While census data for mode of travel to work does not correspond exactly to the localities below39, it
provides an indication of how widely effects to walking, cycling and public transport may be felt.
Motor vehicle use predominates in all of the CAUs adjacent to the Interchange project, and low
reported percentages of walking and cycling, and public transport, which would reflect the primarily
rural environment.
Enhancements to walking and cycling amenity through the local areas as a result of additional
facilities may encourage more people to use active transport options. This would support strategic
goals for the region by encouraging these modes of transport, and developing walking and cycling
networks40. There is also the possibility for flow-on effects in terms of health benefits through
increased activity.
The project is considered to potentially have a minor positive effect on general local wellbeing.
Percival Road Area and Newstead Area
39 The ‘Newstead’ CAU incorporates rural and semi-rural areas to the immediate west of the Expressway, including Fairview Downs in the north, and SH26 in the south. The Eureka CAU takes in all of the areas to the east of the Expressway, and extends as far as Piako Road to the north-east. Refer to Appendix 3 of this report for a map showing the extent of this CAU. 40 Waikato Regional Walking and Cycling Strategy 2009-2015.
Ruakura Interchange 37
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
In recent years, a number of different projects have proposed changes to the areas surrounding this
location, namely; the Proposed Hamilton District Plan, the Ruakura Development (Private Plan
Change), the Hamilton Section of the Waikato Expressway, and the Ruakura Interchange Project.
In meetings with community members, people have expressed feelings of stress and uncertainty as
a result of multiple changes in the area. They have also expressed frustration at their community’s
ability to influence decision-making 41. From a social perspective there is a cumulative effect on the
wellbeing of residents living near the Interchange, as a result of multiple projects, and changes to
proposals over a period of several years.
Although this effect is wider than the Project itself, the Project contributes to this effect on people.
It is proposed from a social perspective that a communication strategy specific to residents
neighbouring the project; and certain interest groups within the 'wider community of interest' is
prepared and implemented (refer to 8 for specific groups to be included). While this may not
mitigate or alleviate effects already experienced by people living near the Project area, it may prevent
this from becoming worse, by providing people with clear understanding of the implications of the
project, and a forum for ongoing communication with the Project team.
With the proposed mitigation above it is considered that this effect can be managed to be a
neutral/very slight negative effect on the wellbeing of these communities.
7.3.2.2 Safety
General Local Effects
With regard to changes to safety as a result of the Interchange project, there are potentially short-
term effects to safety related to construction traffic, and temporary arrangements for pedestrians
through the area, which have been discussed above under walking, cycling and public transport.
It is expected that safety will be maintained throughout the construction period through the
preparation and implementation of a Construction Management Plan, as required by condition 2 of
the existing designation and by the proposed inclusion of provision for the continuous safe access
for pedestrians throughout the construction period.
Percival Road Area
The Interchange project will close of a section of Ruakura Road immediately underneath the Waikato
Expressway. As this will remove through traffic from this section of Ruakura Road, there may be
temporary (short-medium term) improvements to road safety on both sides of the Expressway for
local motorists, as well as pedestrians and cyclists.
This positive effect would only be expected after the closure of the portion of Ruakura Road under
the Expressway, and until the development at the inland port made further changes to the local
roading environment (which is outside the scope of this project).
This is considered to be a neutral/very slight’ positive effect given its temporary nature, and the very
localised area affected.
Silverdale / Hillcrest Area
41 Meetings with Newstead Residents Association and Ruakura Residents Group, 17 July, 2014.
Ruakura Interchange 38
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Potential effects to safety have been addressed above under ‘Walking, Cycling and Public Transport’,
and potential for effects to specific facilities along Silverdale Road are mentioned below under
‘Impacts on Educational Facilities, Community Areas and Sites’.
Newstead Area
Traffic volumes will increase along Ruakura Road and decrease along SH26 as a result of the
Interchange project.
Community members have expressed concerns about the potential for decreases in road safety for
motorists and pedestrians, particularly at the intersection of SH26 and Ruakura Road. Specific
improvements to the intersection of SH26, Lisette Road and Ruakura Road are currently being
investigated by the NZTA as part of a separate process.
There is a school church and cemetery located along SH26 in Newstead, and a preschool on Vaile
Road, where traffic volumes are expected to change as a result of the Interchange.
Traffic volumes along SH26, in front of Newstead Model Country School, and Hamilton Park
Cemetary, are expected to increase as a result of the project42, although this is within the context of
a state highway, and there are expected to be reductions in volumes of heavy commercial vehicles.
As noted in discussions with Newstead Model Country School, children are dropped off inside the
school grounds by their parents, and do not have to negotiate SH26 traffic43.
Although there are increases to traffic volumes projected along Vaile Road, these are small, and not
expected to have an effect on road safety. Children at Newstead Country Preschool occasionally walk
on the footpath along Vaile Road (escorted by staff) to access the walkway to Newstead Model
Country School44 and do not cross the road.
The project will include modifications to intersections and safety enhancements along the length of
the existing Ruakura Road (refer to 7.3.1.2) including sealed shoulders on both sides, a turning bay
for LIC traffic and a formed footpath between Vaile and Morrinsville Roads.
For the above reasons any adverse effects on safety are considered to be avoided, and that there will
be a moderate positive effect on safety in this locality.
State Highway 26/Morrinsville Road
The Interchange project will mean that the designated interchange at SH26 does not need to be
constructed, and predicted injury crashes at this locality will not occur. These changes are already
noted in terms of the general local effects to safety.
Traffic volumes along SH26/Morrinsville Road are predicted to decrease as a result of the project.
Overall there is considered to be a very slight positive effect on safety at this locality.
42 For the 2021 modelled flows. Refer to section 4, Waikato Expressway; Hamilton Section, – Ruakura Interchange Assessment of Traffic Effects. 43 Telephone call to Newstead model Country School, on 23/07/2014. 44 Telephone conversation held 15/07/2014.
Ruakura Interchange 39
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
7.3.3 Environment and Amenity
7.3.3.1 Noise, dust, visual changes
General Local Effects
The construction of the Interchange project will be carried out concurrently with the designated
Expressway45 . Both the Air Quality and Noise Assessments have not proposed any mitigation
specifically related to the Interchange project, considering that the mitigation provided for in the
conditions on the existing designation for the Waikato Expressway construction would be sufficient.
Visual changes as a result of the Interchange project are discussed below with regard to specific
localities.
Potential effects from construction-related vibrations have been identified for specific properties by
the vibration specialist. These are discussed below in relation to people’s property and
neighbourhoods.
Percival Road Area
Changes with regard to amenity in this vicinity include the reconfiguration of the intersection of
Silverdale and Ruakura Roads, the realignment of the western section of Ruakura Road and the
construction of the Interchange itself (as viewed from the west of the Expressway).
The potential for construction-related effects was an issue of concern for local residents in this area.
Some of this concern may have been related to uncertainty about the project, and the extent of effects
from other projects occurring in the area.
As noted above, effects to air quality, noise and visual amenity as a result of the Interchange project
are not anticipated by other technical specialists.
Environment and amenity effects as a result of the Interchange project in this locality are considered
to be to be neutral.
Silverdale / Hillcrest Area
As noted above, effects to air quality and noise as a result of the Interchange project are not
anticipated by other technical specialists.
Visual changes as a result of the Ruakura Interchange itself are expected to be experienced by some
residents to the west of the Expressway 46. This change is expected to be medium-term in duration,
until views of the Interchange is obscured by the Ruakura Development. With regard to amenity,
this effect is considered to be neutral/very slight.
Newstead Area
45 Note that the extent of some potential construction-related effects is not known in detail, as this will be for the contractor to design and carry out. In this matter the social assessment is to some degree guided by the findings of other technical reports. 46 Waikato Expressway; Hamilton Section, – Ruakura Interchange Assessment of Landscape, Visual and Urban Design Effects, 28 July 2014, p.10.
Ruakura Interchange 40
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
As with the Silverdale area; no specific effects are expected as a result of the Interchange project with
respect to air quality or noise.
Community members have expressed concerns about residential amenity as a result of changes in
the area; primarily increased traffic and associated road noise.
While increased noise as a result of the Interchange project is not expected to be significant 47,
findings of the LVUD assessment expect that visual changes as a result of the Interchange will be
experienced by some residents to the east of the Expressway.
With the mitigation measures proposed by the LVUD assessment (landscaping and planting to the
east of the Expressway), these visual changes are considered to have a minor negative effect on
amenity, for some properties at this locality.
7.3.4 Community
7.3.4.1 People’s Property and Neighbourhoods
General Local Effects
Some privately owned land is required for the Interchange project. The majority of this is owned by
Tainui Group Holdings (TGH).
TGH’s PPC requires the Interchange and access to it, so the roading layout as proposed aligns with
Tainui’s aspirations for developing their land. Consultation between the Agency and Tainui to
confirm such details has been on-going, leading up to the notice of requirement being lodged.
As the project has an ongoing working relationship with Tainui, this is not considered to create any
adverse effects on their property rights, and acquisition will be managed under the Public Works Act.
As noted above in relation to amenity and environmental effects, air and noise assessments have
concluded that the effects of the interchange would be consistent with those of the designated
Expressway. Specific effects with regard to vibrations are discussed below.
Percival Road Area
The Interchange project will create the new sections of Ruakura Road connecting to the interchange,
and the interchange itself. This will involve additional piling, earthworks and general road
construction. The effects of construction-related vibration may impact on the residential amenity of
specific properties identified in the vibration assessment48.
In this case the specific mitigations proposed by the vibration specialist are considered to manage
this effect, and from a social perspective, though there may still be an effect to the amenity of specific
properties, this effect is related to the construction, and will be temporary only.
It is further recommended that the resident’s group is added to the list of parties to be provided with
details of the dedicated community liaison person (required under existing condition 9 of the
47 Waikato Expressway; Hamilton Section, – Ruakura Interchange Assessment of Noise Effects, 18 July 2014. 48 Waikato Expressway: Hamilton Section – Ruakura Interchange Assessment of Vibration Effects, 14 July, 2014, p.21.
Ruakura Interchange 41
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
designation) to provide a forum for ongoing communication with the project team during
construction.
With the proposed mitigation in place, effects on people’s property and neighbourhoods is
considered to be neutral/very slight negative.
Silverdale Area
As a result of the Interchange being built at Ruakura, the height of the Expressway / Ruakura Road
will be elevated at this location. This will be visible in the medium-term, until the proposed Ruakura
Development obscures this view. Mitigation is also noted in the LVUD; once further detail regarding
the Ruakura Development masterplan is known.
There may be a temporary very slight negative effect to amenity at this locality, as a result of visual
changes.
Newstead Area
At the (eastern) intersection of the realigned Ruakura Road with the existing Ruakura Road, there is
a rented dwelling on TGH-owned land which is to be removed for the construction of the road.
As the owner of this land and dwelling, TGH will carry out notification and relocation of the affected
resident to an alternative residence on the same site49, to enable the continued operation of this farm,
up to the new (proposed) designation boundary.
Further acquisition of private property is necessary further along Ruakura Road, to enable a minor
realignment of the existing road in order to improve visibility and road safety. As noted in the
summary of community engagement50 the property-owner at this location does not wish to sell the
portion of their land affected by the NOR. The proposed project is considered to have a minor
negative effect on this individual.
There is one other property affected by the requirement for a portion of additional land along
Ruakura Road. At the time of writing this report specific details regarding this property were not
available, however, this is expected to be addressed through PWA processes.
Within the context of this locality, and the designated Expressway, the acquisition of land specifically
for the Interchange project (including one dwelling) is not considered to have an impact on the
neighbourhood.
As noted for the Percival locality, the Interchange project will involve additional piling, earthworks
and general road construction, and the effects of construction-related vibration may impact on the
residential amenity of specific properties identified in the vibration assessment51.
It is also recommended that this resident’s association is added to the list of parties to be provided
with details of the dedicated community liaison person (required under existing condition 9 of the
designation) to provide a forum for ongoing communication with the project team during
construction.
49 Telephone discussion and email, 09/07/2014. 50 Refer to Appendix 4, Review of Previous Consultation. 51 Waikato Expressway: Hamilton Section – Ruakura Interchange Assessment of Vibration Effects, 14 July, 2014, p.21.
Ruakura Interchange 42
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Mitigation to address these potential effects has been proposed by the vibration specialist, and with
the proposed mitigation in place, the effect of construction-vibrations52 on people’s properties and
neighbourhoods is considered to be able to be managed to be neutral/very slight negative.
State Highway 26/Morrinsville Road
There are no direct effects to people’s property or neighbourhoods as a result of the Interchange
project in this locality.
As mentioned above in regards to amenity and environment, there may be very minor indirect
positive effects to neighbouring properties as a result of smaller scale construction at SH26, due to
the designated interchange not being constructed. However these are not considered significant in
other technical reports53 and are not considered to constitute any particular social effects.
7.3.4.2 Impacts on Educational Facilities, Community Areas and Sites
Potential impacts on community areas and sites are discussed here along with educational facilities,
as there are few very close to the Interchange project, and they are located close to educational
facilities. A full list of community facilities can be found in Appendix 2 of this report.
Percival Road Area
There are no facilities in this specific locality. Facilities to the north of this area (refer to Appendix
2) are not considered to be affected by this Project.
Silverdale / Hillcrest Area
Concerns have been raised about the routes to be taken by construction vehicles54, and potential
disruption and impacts on safety as a result. As has been noted previously, construction details are
not known at this stage of the project, however, routes for construction vehicles are to be managed
through the preparation and implementation of the CMP (under existing condition 2 of the
designation) and by the proposed inclusion of provision for the continuous safe access for
pedestrians throughout the construction period.
It is further proposed that condition 2.2(i) of the existing designation is amended to include specific
notification to the following facilities and sites located along Silverdale Road, in order to reduce the
likelihood of any construction-related disruption:
TKKM o Toku Mapihi Maurea
Waikato University
Silverdale Normal School
St Matthews Catholic Church
With the above mitigations in place, it is expected that this potential effect could be managed to be
neutral.
52 As noted in 6.1 of this assessment the vibration assessment proposes no specific mitigation for operational traffic-induced vibrations as a result of the Interchange. 53 Refer particularly to noise, air quality and landscape visual and urban design assessments reviewed in Appendix 5. 54 Telephone call to Silverdale Normal School, on 28/07/2014.
Ruakura Interchange 43
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
The proposed Interchange project will not directly impact any community facilities or sites. The
Interchange project is expected to result in increased traffic volumes at the northern end of Silverdale
Road, and reduced traffic volumes at the southern end of Silverdale Road. It will also alter the
existing intersections of Silverdale and Ruakura Roads.
As a result of these changes, there is the potential for indirect negative effects on:
TKKM o Toku Mapihi Maurea55; and
Waikato University and grounds.
For staff and students encountering higher traffic volumes when travelling to and from school (either
by car or on foot).
There is also the potential for positive indirect effects on:
Silverdale Normal School
St Matthews Catholic Church
For staff, students and parishioners encountering lower traffic volumes when travelling to and from
the school and neighbouring church (either by car or on foot).
As noted in regard to wellbeing effects, these changes are not considered to substantially alter the
safety of the environment, and the effect on the above community facilities and sites is considered to
be neutral.
Newstead Area
Traffic volumes on Ruakura Road east are expected to increase as a result of the Interchange project.
The following community sites and educational facilities are closely grouped within this locality:
Newstead Model Country School
Newstead Preschool
Hamilton Park Cemetery
While concerns about the potential for increased traffic volumes on roads in the Newstead area have
been raised 56 , it is not expected that the Interchange project would cause negative effects to
educational facilities or community sites in this locality. This assessment is based on the findings of
other technical reports (air quality, noise) and from discussions with educational facilities
themselves57, which already respond to a high-traffic environment by having measures to ensure the
road safety of children.
State Highway 26/Morrinsville Road
There are no facilities in this specific locality. Facilities to the south and west of this area (refer to
Appendix 2) are not considered to be substantially affected by this Project. It is noted that the local,
and east-west connectivity through the area is not altered as a result of the Interchange project.
55 TKKM o Toku Mapihi Maurea expressed concern about the potential for increased traffic volumes along Silverdale Road to have a negative effect on the safety of children who cross Silverdale Road in the morning (Telephone call to TKKM o Toku Mapihi Maurea, on 23/07/2014). 56 Refer to Appendix 4 of this assessment. 57 Meeting with Newstead Residents Association, 17 July, 2014.
Ruakura Interchange 44
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
7.3.4.3 Impacts on Community Plans and Aspirations
Percival Road Area
The Interchange project will alter the local roading environment for the Percival Road area.
In meeting with the Ruakura residents group58, they expressed a particular desire to have continued
access to Hamilton in the future, and to have the opportunity to participate in decision-making
processes regarding their community.
The Interchange project is not removing access from residents to the city 59 . With regard to
participation in decision-making processes, social mitigation is proposed in order to maximise the
opportunity to benefit the community in this regard.
It is recommended that this resident’s group is added to the list of parties to be provided with details
of the dedicated community liaison person (required under existing condition 9 of the designation)
to provide a forum for ongoing communication with the project team during construction.
It is also proposed to notify the residents group specifically in order to facilitate the group's
participation in the hearing process.
It is considered that with the above actions implemented that there would be a neutral/very slight
positive effect on the community’s plans and aspirations.
Silverdale / Hillcrest Area
The Interchange project is creating additional infrastructure within the context of the Waikato
Expressway – Hamilton Section.
Members of the Silverdale Residents Group60 have emphasised the importance of the ecology of the
area, and their concern about the potential for the increased scale of infrastructure and stormwater
runoff to result in negative effects on the ecology of the existing environment.
Assessment of potential adverse ecological effects as a result of the Interchange is out of scope for
this assessment, and is specifically dealt with in a separate assessment report61.
Newstead Area
The Newstead community have expressed a desire to be involved in decision-making processes
which affect their neighbourhood62 (this is discussed in more detail with regard to wellbeing effects).
Measures proposed in this assessment to mitigate effects on the wellbeing of residents in this locality
also have the potential to create benefits in terms of providing a forum for ongoing communication
and involvement in the project.
58 Meeting with Ruakura Residents Group, 17 July, 2014. 59 Access to the city will be altered for specific residences to the east of the Expressway, although access to Hamilton City will remain via the realigned Ruakura Road. 60 Refer to details in the summary of Community Engagement, Appendix 4. 61 Refer to Waikato Expressway: Hamilton Section – Ruakura Interchange Assessment of Ecological Effects. 62 Ibid.
Ruakura Interchange 45
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Proposed social mitigation (with regard to participation) is to provide this group with details of the
dedicated community liaison person to provide a clear feedback loop throughout the construction
process. As for the Percival Road area above, the residents group could be specifically notified in
order to facilitate the group's participation in the hearing process.
It is considered that with the above actions implemented that there would be a neutral/very slight
positive effect on the community’s plans and aspirations.
The interchange project will alter the local roading environment for the Newstead area through the
realignment of Ruakura Road, and to a lesser degree the removal of the interchange at SH26.
Increased traffic volumes are also projected along Ruakura Road (east) as part of the Interchange
project.
The Newstead Community have a stated aspiration63 for the preservation of the rural amenity of their
neighbourhood, and concerns that changes as a result of the Interchange project could have a
negative effect on that amenity.
As outlined above64 there may be a minor negative effect on the amenity of specific properties within
the Newstead locality. This effect is not considered to apply to the neighbourhood as a whole.
Effects to community plans and aspirations for this community are considered to be minor positive.
7.3.4.4 Impacts on and Accessibility to Commercial Areas
General Local Effects
The interchange project will provide for continued east-west connections, providing for ongoing
access to major commercial facilities in Hamilton CBD, and for specific commercial premises in the
local area. There will be no direct effects to any commercial facilities as a result of the construction
or operation of the project.
Any potential disruption to access to commercial facilities as a result of construction vehicle
movements or traffic are expected to be managed via the implementation of the CMP, as outlined
with regard to access, connectivity and patterns of mobility. Potential effects to accessibility of
commercial areas are expected to be able to be managed. These effects are assessed to be neutral.
Newstead Area
During operation, the Interchange is expected to result in increased traffic volumes along Ruakura
Road (east). There have been concerns expressed65 by people in the Newstead community about
potential congestion and traffic conflicts around the LIC site at the corner of Ruakura Rd and SH26.
This has been addressed by the project through the inclusion of a right-hand turning bay from
Ruakura Road into the LIC site, which will improve the safety of workers and visitors to the site, and
the safety of the road for local residents and other motorists.
63 ‘One Community Plan; for Eureka, Matangi, Newstead and Tauwhare’ (2013-2023), and in meeting with representatives of the Newstead Residents Association, 17 July, 2014. 64 Refer to discussion of amenity effects above in 7.3.3.1 of this assessment. 65 By LIC/Dairy NZ (Notes of meeting held; 21/07/2014), and by members of the Newstead Residents Association (at meeting held; 17/07/2014).
Ruakura Interchange 46
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Other safety enhancements planned along Ruakura Road (outlined above in terms of ‘Way of Life’)
will further improve the amenity of Ruakura Road for employees at this facility, who use the
surrounding roads for recreational purposes.
Effects to commercial sites, and accessibility to commercial sites is therefore expected to be
neutral.
Ruakura Interchange 47
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
7.4 Summary Tables
The tables below provide a summary of:
The effect
The stage of the effect (P – Planning, C – Construction, O – Operation)
Who is affected (D – directly affected landowners, N – neighbours, W – wider community)
Proposed mitigation measures
An overall rating of the magnitude of the effect (with mitigation), and
Further comments or mitigation recommended from a social perspective.
7.4.1 Way of Life
Table 1:Accessibility, Connectivity and Patterns of Mobility
Locality Effect Stage Affects Mitigation Overall Rating
Comment
Regional Improved regional movement of freight and people.
O W N/A – positive effect Moderate positive
General
Local
Improvements to north-south connectivity for local residents.
O W/N N/A – positive effect Moderate positive
General Local
Potential negative effects on mobility due to construction vehicle movements
C N CMP (condition 2 of existing
designation).
Proposed inclusions in condition
2.2 to provide for access for
pedestrians and cyclists.
Neutral
Percival Reduced connections and mobility for some residents in the Percival/Ryburn Road area.
O N/D Continued east-west access is maintained.
Minor negative
This is a small change to the travel time for a limited number of residents.
Newstead Changes to accessibility due to increased traffic volumes on Ruakura Road east.
O N Right-turn lane for LIC access. Enhancements to Ruakura Road.
Neutral /very slight
Ruakura Interchange 48
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
SH26 Potential for reduced connectivity to Waikato Expressway (WEX) for residents near SH26.
O N Improved connections in both
directions at Ruakura.
Neutral
Table 2: Changes to ways of Walking, Cycling and changes to Public Transport
Locality Effect Stage Affects Mitigation Overall Rating
Comment
General Local
Improvements to walking and cycling facilities
O N N/A – positive effect Moderate positive
General Local
Potential negative effects on mobility due to construction vehicle movements
C N CMP (condition 2 of existing
designation).
Proposed inclusions in condition
2.2 to provide for access for
pedestrians.
Neutral
Percival Impact of closure of section of Ruakura Road on walking and cycling options for some residents in the Percival/Ryburn Road area.
O N Mitigation of this effect would be very difficult and costly within the restrictions of the Project.
Minor negative
This change is limited to a small number of residents, and affects specific movements.
Silverdale Potential disruption of walking and cycling routes and end-user bus facilities.
C N CMP (condition 2 of existing designation). Proposed inclusions in condition 2.2 to provide for access for pedestrians.
Neutral With proposed mitigations
this is expected to be
managed to be a neutral
effect.
Newstead Improvements to walking and cycling amenity through inclusion of new facilities.
O N N/A – positive effect Moderate positive.
Increased traffic volumes are expected, but there are a number of improvements in this location.
SH26 Reduced traffic volumes on existing roads.
O N N/A – positive effect Neutral / very slight.
Ruakura Interchange 49
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
7.4.2 Wellbeing
Table 3: Changes to wellbeing
Locality Effect Stage Affects Mitigation Overall Rating
Comment
General Local
Potential for enhanced amenity of walking and cycling to encourage activity.
O N N/A – positive effect Minor
positive
Percival and Newstead
Cumulative effects on wellbeing as a result of uncertainty and multiple projects
P/C/O
N/D Community Liaison (condition 9 of existing designation). Proposed inclusion in condition 9 to provide community liaison details to both residents’ group / association.
Neutral/
very
slight
negative
Assessment including
proposed social mitigation.
Table 4: Safety
Locality Effect Stage Affects Mitigation Overall Rating
Comment
General Local
Potential effects on safety of local traffic (motorists / pedestrians / cyclists) during construction.
C N CMP (condition 2 of existing designation). Proposed inclusions in condition 2.2 to provide for access for pedestrians.
Neutral
Percival Potential improvement to safety from elimination of through traffic on Ruakura Rd
O N Positive effect - requires no mitigation
Neutral / very slight positive
This is considered to be a neutral/very slight positive effect given its temporary nature, and the very localised area affected.
Newstead Changes to safety as a result of
increased traffic volumes.
O W/N Improved sightlines along existing, right-turning bay into LIC and other safety
Moderate positive
Safety enhancements outweigh potential negative effect to safety and the overall effect is positive.
Ruakura Interchange 50
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
enhancements along Ruakura Road.
SH26 Potential for increase in safety and amenity as a result of the projected decrease in traffic volumes along SH26/Morrinsville Road
O N N/A – positive effect Neutral / very slight positive
7.4.3 Environment and Amenity
Table 5: Noise, dust, visual changes
Locality Effect Stage Affects Mitigation Overall Rating
Comment
Silverdale Potential (medium-term) effect to amenity of specific properties as a result of visual changes.
C/O D Mitigation to be undertaken after the Ruakura development masterplan is in place will mitigate this medium-term effect.
Neutral/very slight
Newstead Potential effect to amenity of specific properties as a result of visual changes.
C/O D Landscape mitigation and planting to the east as recommended in the LVUD
Minor negative
This minor rating is conservatively applied, as properties affected are also (partially) affected by local roading changes.
7.4.4 Community
Table 6: People’s Property and Neighbourhoods
Locality Effect Stage Affects Mitigation Overall Rating
Comment
General Local
Loss of private property acquired for the Interchange project.
P/C D Land acquisition Neutral Main landowner is to TGH. Effect to TGH is
Ruakura Interchange 51
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
not considered negative as discussed in 7.3.4.1.
Percival Construction-related effects on residential amenity (at specific locations), and wellbeing of residents.
C D Preparation and implementation of a CVMP (conditions 2.4-2.9 of existing designation).
Minor negative
The rating provided here is based on the mitigation being implemented.
Silverdale Potential for visual changes to effect amenity for some residents.
C/O N Future work: mitigation to be detailed once further information on Ruakura Development is available, as recommended by LVUD.
Neutral/very slight
Newstead Loss of residential properties as a result of the realignment of Ruakura Rd.
C/O D Community Liaison (condition 9 of existing designation).
Minor negative
Not that landowner (TGH) have committed to providing replacement accommodation to the affected resident.
SH26 Indirect positive effects due to SH26 intersection not being constructed.
C N N/A Neutral
Table 7: Impacts on Educational Facilities, Community Areas and Sites
Locality Effect Stage Affects Mitigation Overall Rating
Comment
Regional Potential construction-related effects to Waikato University and facilities
C W, N CMP (condition 2 of existing designation). Further mitigation proposed to amend condition 2.2(i) of the existing designation to include Waikato University
Neutral / very slight
Regional Improved regional connections to university and other community sites.
O W, N N/A – positive effect Moderate positive
Silverdale Potential disruption of facilities and
areas during construction
C N CMP (condition 2 of existing designation).
Neutral Endorse the condition proposed in Traffic
Ruakura Interchange 52
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Further mitigation proposed to
amend condition 2.2(i) of the
existing designation to include
schools and facilities along
Silverdale Road (refer to 8 ).
Assessment with regard to avoiding construction vehicle movements past Silverdale School at start and end of school day.
Silverdale Effects to local schools and
community sites.
O N N/A Neutral
Newstead Effects to local schools and
community sites.
O N N/A Neutral
Table 8: Impacts on Community Plans and Aspirations
Locality Effect Stage Affects Mitigation Overall Rating
Comment
Reg Contributes to community outcomes identified in Waikato Regional and Hamilton City’s LTPs
P/O W N/A – positive effect Significant positive
Reg Facilitates Tainui stated goals and aspirations
P/O W N/A – positive effect Significant positive
Percival Effect to the Residents Group's stated aim of participating in decision-making processes.
P/C W/N Community Liaison – condition 9 of the designation. Proposed inclusion in condition 9 to provide community liaison details to both residents’ group / association. Further proposed to notify residents group in order to facilitate participation in the hearing process.
Neutral/very slight positive
Newstead Effect to the Residents Association's stated aim of participating in decision-making processes.
P/C W/N Community Liaison – condition 9 of the designation. Proposed inclusion in condition 9 to provide community liaison
Neutral/very slight positive
Ruakura Interchange 53
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
details to both residents’ group / association. Further proposed to notify residents group in order to facilitate participation in the hearing process.
Table 9: Impacts on and Accessibility to Commercial Areas
Locality Effect Stage Affects Mitigation Overall
Rating Comment
Regional Improved connectivity to Hamilton CBD
O W N/A – positive effect Moderate positive
Regional Efficient connections to Ruakura Development
O W N/A – positive effect Moderate positive
This is rated moderate, rather than significant, as the Ruakura Development will take many years to become a regionally significant commercial centre.
General Local
Potential disruption to commercial facilities during construction.
C N CMP (condition 2 of existing designation).
Neutral
Newstead Potential congestion and traffic conflicts near LIC site
O W/N Provision of right-turn bay on Ruakura Road.
Neutral
Ruakura Interchange 54
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
8 Recommended Mitigation
Many of the mitigation measures discussed in the Assessment of Effects Table above have been
incorporated in the detailed design of the Project, and/or are covered in other specialist’s
assessments. These mitigations have been recommended by the environmental specialists and
design team to avoid or reduce the magnitude of the social effects of the project and are supported
by this social assessment. Some additional mitigation has also been recommended by the social
assessment.
The table below summarises both the specific mitigation measures which have already been
incorporated in the Project design, and those to be undertaken during the construction and
operational phases of the Project. This table only summarises the mitigations proposed for effects
which are assessed to be minor negative or greater, or where there is a specific social mitigation
proposed. The particular social effects these mitigation measures address are discussed in greater
detail above in the Assessment of Effects (section 7). For consistency and cross-referencing purposes,
the table below is structured to reflect the IAIA effects categories.
8.1 Summary of Proposed Mitigation Measures
Category Effect Mitigation Recommended Social
Mitigation
Way of Life Accessibility,
connectivity,
patterns of
mobility.
Construction-related effects to local accessibility.
Condition 2: CMP
Congestion related to increased traffic volumes on Ruakura Road.
Right-hand turning bay and safety enhancements along Ruakura Road
Way of Life Changes to ways
of walking &
cycling and
changes to public
transport.
Potential disruption of walking and cycling routes during construction.
Condition 2: CMP. Proposed inclusions in condition 2.2 to provide for access for pedestrians and cyclists.
Wellbeing Changes to wellbeing.
Cumulative effects on wellbeing as a result of uncertainty and multiple projects
Condition 9: Community Liaison
Proposed addition of parties (specified below in 8) to existing conditions 2.2(i) and 9 of the designation.
Wellbeing Safety
Potential for negative effect to safety for local road users during construction.
Condition 2: CMP. Proposed inclusions in condition 2.2 to provide for access for pedestrians and cyclists.
Wellbeing Safety
Potential safety implications from increased traffic volumes along Ruakura Road.
Right-hand turning bay and safety enhancements along Ruakura Road
Environment and Amenity
Potential (medium-term) effect to amenity of specific properties as a result of visual changes.
Condition 6.1: Landscaping Management Plan (LMP)
Ruakura Interchange 55
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Noise, dust, visual changes
Potential effect to amenity of specific properties as a result of visual changes.
Condition 6.1: LMP
Community Impacts on people’s property and neighbourhoods
Loss of private property acquired for the Interchange project.
Acquisition of affected portion of land.
Construction-related effects on residential amenity and wellbeing of residents
Conditions 2.4-2.9: CNVMP Condition 9: Community Liaison
Proposed addition of parties (specified below in 8) to existing condition 9 of the designation.
Potential for visual changes to effect amenity for some residents.
Condition 6.1: LMP
Loss of residential properties as a result of the realignment of Ruakura Rd
Condition 9: Community Liaison. Acquisition of affected portion of land.
Community Impacts on educational facilities and community areas and sites
Potential construction-related effects to educational facilities and community sites Silverdale area
Condition 2: CMP Condition 9: Community Liaison
Proposed inclusions in condition 2.2 to provide for access for pedestrians and cyclists. Proposed addition of parties (specified below in 8) to existing conditions 2.2(i) and 9 of the designation.
Community Impacts on community plans and aspirations
Effect to Residents Group aims of participating in decision-making processes.
Condition 9: Community Liaison
Proposed addition of parties (specified below in 8) to existing condition 9 of the designation. Proposed to notify groups of alteration.
Community Impacts on and accessibility to commercial areas
Potential disruption to commercial and retail facilities during construction.
Condition 2: CMP Condition 9: Community Liaison
8.2 Recommended Mitigation Measures
Condition 2 of the NoR provides the detail to be contained in the Construction Management Plan,
however, these conditions don’t mention the maintenance of safe pedestrian / cycling access
throughout the works. It is recommended that a new sub-condition is added to Condition 2 of the
NoR as follows:
(xviii) Maintenance of continuous safe access for pedestrians and cyclists during construction.
Conditions 2.2 (i) and 9 of the existing designation specify community groups and facilities to be
notified of construction activities, and provided with contact details for the dedicated community
liaison person. The specified parties relate to the social environment assessed at the time of the
original designation, which did not include the Ruakura Interchange. It is therefore recommended
that the following additions are made.
Ruakura Interchange 56
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Add the following groups to the existing NoR Condition 2.2 (i):
Ruakura Resident’s Group
Silverdale Resident’s Group
Newstead Resident’s Association
Waikato University
TKKM o Toku Mapihi Maurea
Silverdale Normal School
St Matthews Catholic Church
Add the following groups to NoR Condition 9:
Ruakura Resident’s Group
Silverdale Resident’s Group
Newstead Resident’s Association
Waikato University
TKKM o Toku Mapihi Maurea
Silverdale Normal School
St Matthews Catholic Church
Note that according to condition 9, a clearly identified community liaison person is to be appointed
when the NoR is included in the DP. This provides an opportunity to positively address the identified
cumulative effects to wellbeing by providing a forum for communication with community groups.
It is also recommended that communication with the above residents groups is continued, including
but not limited to personal notification of the alteration to designation to maximise the opportunity
of these groups to participate in the public hearing process.
9 Monitoring
As discussed in section 7 of this report, the changes to the existing designation as a result of the
proposed Interchange are not anticipated to result in any social effects that are more than minor
negative. Identified social effects related to air quality, noise and vibrations will be managed and
monitored through the implementation of existing conditions on the designation.
Identified social effects relating to walking and cycling, construction traffic management, cumulative
effects, wellbeing and participation can be managed through the implementation of the proposed
additions to existing conditions on the designation (conditions 2.2 and 9).
On this basis, specific monitoring of social effects is not proposed.
10 Recommendations and Conclusion
10.1 Recommendations
It is recommended that the additions to existing conditions on the designation, and recommended
mitigation described in section 8 of this assessment, are included to mitigate the actual and
potential social effects of the project.
Ruakura Interchange 57
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
10.2 Conclusion
The proposed Ruakura Interchange project is expected to result in very slight to significant positive
regional social effects and very slight to moderate positive local social effects. Positive effects as a
result of the project include:
Improved regional and local connectivity, enabling the movements of people to and from sources
of education, recreation and employment.
Facilitated development of a regionally significant commercial facility.
Support for regional and city-wide community plans and aspirations.
Enhancement of local amenity of active transport networks for pedestrians and cyclists, which
has the potential to encourage greater use among local residents, as well as workers and students
in the area.
Identified negative effects as a result of the project include:
Potential negative effects to safety and amenity of the local road networks for pedestrians and
cyclists during construction, particularly in the location of schools and community facilities in
the Silverdale area.
Potential effects to neighbourhood amenity both during construction and once operational as a
result of changes in traffic volumes and visual changes.
Very localised severance of connectivity at Ruakura Road (Percival/Ryburn Road area) as a result
of partial road closure.
Small amounts of private property acquisition (partial acquisition and one dwelling to be
removed).
The project includes existing mitigation for potential safety and congestion effects, and there are a
number of conditions on the existing designation over the Waikato Expressway: Hamilton Section
which will address most of the identified social effects.
Additional mitigation has been proposed to conditions 2 and 9 of the existing designation, to include
certain community facilities and sites in notification related to the project, and in the community
liaison details.
With proposed mitigations in place, negative effects can be managed to result in neutral/very slight
negative regional effects and very slight to minor negative effects at local levels.
Negative effects of the project, with the exception of the localised effects of the closure of part of
Ruakura Road are able to be mitigated.
Identified local dis-benefits, or negative effects need to be considered in light of the designated
Expressway, and what would be a small scale change in comparison.
Overall, the social effects can be categorised as being positive at the regional level, with a mixture of
negative and positive effects at finer local levels.
Appendix 1
Strategic and Policy
Context
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Appendix 1 – Review of Plans, Policies
and Strategies
Waikato Region
Long Term Council Community Plan 2012-2022
The LTCCP is a requirement of the Local Government Act 2002. It contains information about the
Waikato Region’s planned activities for the next ten years and shows how these contribute to the
agreed community outcomes. The community outcomes cover a range of matters, with the following
being most relevant to the Project:
» Heritage sites and landscapes of significance to whanau, hapu and iwi are preserved
and valued
» Iwi, hapu and Maori work together with central government, local government and
community organisations in mutually beneficial partnerships
» Our natural environment is protected and respected. Its ecological balance is restored,
its air, soil and water quality is improved and its native biodiversity is enhanced.
» Our region’s waterways have consistently high water quality.
» We have reliable, efficient and well-planned infrastructure and services.
The Ruakura Interchange project forms part of the Waikato Expressway, which is a key piece of
infrastructure that has been deemed of national significance by the current government.
Regional Policy Statement for the Waikato Region
The Regional Policy Statement (RPS) outlines the resource management issues for the region, and
the policies and methods to be used in managing its physical and natural resources. The RPS
identifies adverse environmental effects from transport systems such as air quality as a resource
management issue, and its policies require protection, maintenance or enhancement of significant
characteristics of air quality.
Air quality can have impacts on people’s health and well-being, and on their ability to enjoy the local
environment.
Proposed Regional Policy Statement for the Waikato Region (decisions version,
November 2012)
The Proposed RPS sets out issues, objectives and policies relating to the natural and physical
resources of the Waikato Region. The Proposed RPS is currently subject to Environment Court
appeals.
The Proposed RPS addresses a number of issues that are relevant to the consideration of social
impacts associated with the Project. These include air quality, built environment, mauri and health
of freshwater bodies, historic and cultural heritage, amenity and public access. Amenity is considered
particularly relevant, and has the following objective:
The qualities and characteristics of areas and features, valued for their contribution to amenity,
are maintained and enhanced.
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Future Proof
Future Proof is a growth strategy for the Hamilton, Waikato, and Waipa sub-region. The strategy
focuses on managing growth within the sub-region, and creating more compact urban areas based
around Hamilton, and existing rural townships and villages.
Future Proof provides a high level blueprint for development in the form of a preferred settlement
pattern. The strategy identifies the Waikato Expressway as: the pre-eminent and key transport
project for both the sub-region and the Waikato region.
The Future Proof strategy therefore provides the high level strategic context for development and
growth within the sub-region, including the development of the Waikato Expressway corridor and
the proposed alterations to the designation.
Waikato Regional Land Transport Strategy 2011-2041
The Waikato RLTS establishes the strategic vision and outcomes for transport in the Waikato Region.
The RLTS identifies that the Waikato Expressway is the region’s primary strategic corridor, and as a
nationally significant road corridor. It will be the main north-south inter-regional route connecting
the Waikato to the Auckland region and south and a significant tourism and freight route. The
strategy highlights that the RLTS will not be fully realised without completion of the Waikato
Expressway.
The following policies and actions are relevant to the Ruakura Interchange project, as a modification
to the Waikato Expressway:
Priority Focus Relevant Policies
Region-wide policies for strategic road and rail
corridors
Ensure key strategic road corridors, as defined in chapter
8, are developed, maintained and protected in a manner
consistent with their functions outlined in table 7 in this
strategy.
Sector-specific policies for key strategic
corridors
P8.12 Recognise the Waikato Expressway as a Road of
National Significance (RONS).
P8.13 Prioritise development of the Waikato Expressway
as the number one strategic transport project for the
Waikato region.
P8.16 Ensure bypassed sections of State Highway 1
continue to respond to local transport requirements
following the completion of the Waikato Expressway.
Waikato Regional Walking and Cycling Strategy 2009-2015
The primary purpose of the Waikato Regional Walking and Cycling Strategy (the Strategy) is to
support the walking and cycling components of the RLTS and the national transport objectives of
the NZTS and GPS. Other aims of the Strategy include
» coordination of walking and cycling initiates,
» encouragement,
» coordination of development of the walking and cycling network
» providing of information
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
» support and coordination with other strategies and plans
» provide for a monitoring framework
» Inform the review or the RLTS and RLTP
Hamilton City
Long Term Council Community Plan 2009-2019
The LTCCP is a requirement of the Local Government Act 2002. The LTCCP outlines community
outcomes, of which the most relevant to the Interchange project are:
Sustainable and well-planned: This includes having integrated transport systems that connect to
New Zealand.
Intelligent and Progressive City: This includes being the thriving economic hub for the Waikato
Region and provider of regional services.
Access Hamilton Strategy
The Access Hamilton Strategy guides the city’s development and transport infrastructure planning
over the next thirty years. The strategy aims to:
» Support Hamilton’s economic, social, environmental and cultural wellbeing.
» Support the land use, sustainability and economic development objectives for a compact
city with consolidation and intensification around key nodes and a vibrant city centre.
» Manage incremental change in the transport and land use system necessary to achieve
Hamilton’s strategic objectives.
» Position infrastructure and land development to meet the city’s long term needs.
Of key relevance to the proposed alterations, the Access Hamilton ‘Generation and Destination
Nodes’ map shows:
» An extension of the Resolution Drive corridor and connection to the Expressway
» A direct connecting arm between the Greenhill Interchange and the Wairere
Roundabout
Hamilton Social Wellbeing Strategy
The Social Wellbeing strategy identifies four priorities that respond to the needs, challenges and
opportunities in Hamilton City. The relevant priority is:
» Connecting our communities Encourage and support community-led initiatives.
Strengthen participation across diverse communities.
Inspire communities to take pride and ownership in Hamilton.
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Hamilton Urban Growth Strategy
The Hamilton Urban Growth Strategy was developed in parallel with the Future Proof strategy, and
as a result there is significant alignment between the two strategies. The strategy examines future
growth of the city and proposes both intensifying existing areas, and extending into new greenfield
sites.
Hamilton City Proposed District Plan
The Hamilton City Proposed District Plan includes zone changes for areas which have recently come
into the City’s jurisdiction as a result of the boundary changes. These areas are administered by the
Hamilton City Council (HCC) and are affected by the operative rules of the Waikato District Plan,
and the Proposed Rules of the Proposed Hamilton City Plan.
HCC have released decisions on the Proposed District Plan. However, several sections of the
Proposed District Plan have had their decisions deferred, with decisions yet to be made. This includes
matters relating to Ruakura. HCC have also ascertained that on analysing submissions received,
none of the rules in the Proposed District Plan can be treated as operative. This will be revaluated
after the appeal period has expired.
In terms of the Ruakura section of the Proposed District Plan, the Ruakura Development Plan
Change Request is being heard by an EPA process.
Waikato District
Long Term Plan 2009-2019
The LTP is a requirement of the Local Government Act 2002. The LTP outlines community
outcomes, of which the most relevant to the Interchange project are:
Accessible Waikato – this outcome is directly relevant to the project, as one of the elements is that
the strategic importance of the Waikato Expressway is recognised and development occurs with
priority, and its effects are planned for and mitigated where necessary.
Safe Waikato – part of this outcome relates to ensuring that infrastructure projects take account of
public safety. The Interchange project, as part of the Waikato Expressway, will have high safety and
design standards.
Waikato District Plan (Updated Feb 2014)
Plan Change 2 became operative on 21 February 2014 and resulted in changes throughout various
sections of the District Plan. Plan Change 2 related to District Wide Growth and Rural and Coastal
Subdivision and sought to promote a strategic framework to more effectively manage growth
patterns in rural and urban areas. Change 2 resulted in changes throughout various sections of the
District Plan. It is noted that the Waikato Expressway Network Plan was identified as relevant to
Plan Change 2.
The Waikato District Plan sets out the objectives, policies and rules to address resource management
issues within the district. From a social perspective, the following objectives have been identified as
relevant to social aspirations:
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
» Objective 11.2.1: Towns, villages, neighbourhoods and localities have social coherence
and a sense of place
» Objective 11.2.7: Valued social and cultural characteristics of communities are retained
» Objective 11.6.1: People and communities are able to access resources so that they can
provide for their economic well-being
One Community Plan; for Eureka, Matangi, Newstead and Tauwhare (2013-2023)
This plan outlines key issues of importance to the communities of Eureka, Matangi, Newstead and
Tauwhare and provides long term plan priorities for these communities. The Newstead community
prioritises in particular participation in decision-making processes related to the intersection of
SH26 9Morrinsville Road) and Ruakura Road and matters related to the Inland Port. It also states
that future proofing road to accommodate future use is a priority for the community.
Among the key issues identified in the Community Plan are:
» Intersection safety in the Newstead area needs to be reviewed in light of increased traffic
volumes
» Roads need to be widened to allow for cycle ways and walkways
» Potential effects of the Waikato Expressway on the local road network
» Maintaining the rural amenity of the Newstead area
Appendix 2
Community
Facilities
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Appendix 2 - Community Facilities The following provides an overview of community facilities near the Interchange. While these are
not necessarily expected to be affected by the project, they provide an indication of the locations that
local residents and regional visitors are likely to visit, and the types of connections which are
important for communities.
Schools and other Educational Facilities
Below is a list of the educational facilities which are in the closest proximity to the proposed
interchange.
Table 10: Educational Facilities
Educational facility Address Approx. kms to
Interchange
Newstead Model School SH26 2.18
TKKM o Toku Mapiki Maurea 137 Silverdale Road, Hillcrest 1.42
Silverdale Normal School 62 Silverdale Road, Silverdale 1.53
Hillcrest High School 132 Masters Avenue, Silverdale 1.65
Knighton Normal School Knighton Road, Hillcrest 2.66
Berkley Normal Middle School 26 Berkley Avenue, Hillcrest 2.7
Hamilton Seventh Day Adventist
School
46 Annebrooke Road, Hamilton East 3.25
Hillcrest Normal School 218 Cambridge Road, Hillcrest 2.84
St John’s College Hillcrest Road, 2.07
Peachgrove Intermediate Peachgrove Road 3.01
Patricia Avenue School Patricia Avenue 2.92
Southwell School Peachgrove Road 3.16
TKKM o Te Ara Rima Fifth Avenue 3.4
Tai Wananga Ruakura Lane, Ruakura 2.0
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Table 11: Early Childhood Education Providers
Early Childhood Education
Providers Address
Approx. kms to
Interchange
Kids to Five Dey Street Childcare 421 Dey Street, Hamilton East 2.77
ABC Peachgrove 205 Peachgrove Road, Claudelands 3.30
Newstead Country Pre-school 92 Vaile Road, Newstead 1.84
Hillcrest Kindergartens Waikato 56 Masters Avenue, Hillcrest 2.2
Preschool Education Centre 12 Fenwick Crescent, Hillcrest 2.47
Campus Creche Trust 186 Hillcrest Road, Hillcrest 1.49
Te Kohanga reo O Nga Kuaka 159 Silverdale Road, Silverdale 1.37
Table 12: Other Educational Providers
Other Educational Providers Address
The National Institute of Water and Atmospheric
Research (NIWA)
Silverdale Road, Hillcrest
Landcare Research University Of Waikato, Hillcrest, Silverdale
AgResearch Ruakura Research Centre, East Street
Plant and Food Research Ruakura Campus Bisley Road, Ruakura
Waikato University Campus Knighton Road, Hillcrest
Vision College, Hamilton Campus 21 Ruakura Road, Hamilton East
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Churches and Religious Centres
Table 13: Churches and Religious Centres
Churches and religious centres Address Approx. kms to Interchange
St Matthew’s Catholic Church 58 Silverdale Road, Silverdale 1.7
Hillcrest Chapel 210 Masters Avenue, Hillcrest 1.96
Methodist Church 92 Mansell Avenue, Hillcrest 2.6
Christadelphian Ecclesia 36 Morrinsville Road, Silverdale 2.54
Hillcrest Baptist Church Knighton Road, Hillcrest 2.5
Vision Church 11 Bisley Road, Enderley 2.6
Central Hamilton Gospel Church (near 160) Peachgrove Road, 2.98
All Hallows Chapel (co-located with Southwell School) Peachgrove Road
3.16
Freedom Christian Church (located at Hillcrest Normal School) 218 Cambridge Road, Hillcrest, Hamilton, Waikato
2.8
Hamilton Tongan Assembly of God Methodist Church, Heaphy Terrace, Hamilton, Waikato
4.4
Catholic Family Support Services 100 Morrinsville Road, Hillcrest, Hamilton 3216
2.3
Church of Christ New Zealand 360 Peachgrove Road, Enderley, Hamilton, Waikato
4
East Side Seventh Day Adventist Church
Corner of Tennyson Road & Mardon Road, Enderley, Hamilton, Waikato
3.5
Free Church of Tonga 26 Masefield Drive, Enderley, Hamilton, Waikato
3.6
Vision Church Eastside 112 East Street, Enderley, Hamilton, Waikato
2.6
Health Services
Waikato Hospital is at the southern end of Hamilton CBD across the river from the project area.
There are also small medical practices and alternative medical facilities at the following locations
Table 14: Health Services
Health services Address
Masters Medical Clinic 54 Masters Avenue, Silverdale
Hillcrest Medical Centre Cnr Cambridge Road and Hillcrest Road
Te Kohao Health 180 Dey St, Hamilton East, Hamilton 3216
Hamilton East Medical Centre 16 Beale Street, Hamilton East
Green forest Chinese Medical Centre 99 Te Aroha Street, Ruakura
Emergency services
Emergency services are not located near the Interchange, but provide a regional service.
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Table 15: Emergency Services
Emergency services Address
Chartwell Fire Station 70 Crosby Road, Chedworth Park Ltd
New Zealand Police – East Hamilton 245 Clyde Street, Hamilton
Recreational Facilities and Parks
Table 16: Recreational Facilities and Parks
Recreational facilities and parks Address
Don Lwellyn Sports Complex (Waikato University) Silverdale Road.
Ruakura Campus Club Ruakura Lane, Claudelands
Waikato Kendo Club (Waikato University) Hillcrest Road
Willowbrook Park 15 Vaile Road, Newstead
Hamilton City Holiday Park 14 Ruakura Road, Ruakura
Chelmsford Park Chelmsford Street, Silverdale
Other Facilities
Table 17: Other facilities
Other facilities Address
Kirikiriroa Marae 180 Dey Street
Waikato Innovation Park 9 Melody Lane, Hamilton East
Livestock Improvement Corporation / Corner Ruakura and Morrinsville Road (SH26,
Newstead
Hilda Ross Retirement Village 30 Ruakura Road, Claudelands
Hillcrest Library Masters Avenue, Hillcrest
Dairy NZ Corner Ruakura and Morrinsville Road (SH26,
Newstead
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Figure 7: Early Childhood Education Providers
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Figure 8: Schools and Education Providers
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Figure 9: Waikato University Campus Map
(downloaded from: http://www.waikato.ac.nz/contacts/map/ )
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Figure 10: Churches and Religious Centres
Appendix 3
Travel Patterns
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Appendix 3 – Travel Patterns
Travel to Work
The tables below provide a ‘snapshot’ of travel patterns in the local areas, through the ‘main means
of travel to work’ responses provided in the Census of population and dwellings66. The Census Area
Units (CAUs) referred to above are shown in Figure 11 below.
Note that the Census of Population and Dwellings uses random rounding to base 3 as one of its rules
to preserve the confidentiality of census data. This means that where data tables contain a cell with
‘3’, this may in fact be a smaller number. Due to confidentialisation, data in the tables may not add
up to the totals provided 67.
Figure 11:Census Area Units around the Ruakura Interchange
66 NZ Census of Population and Dwellings tables downloaded from: http://www.stats.govt.nz/ 67 For more detail on census rules and confidentiality, refer to the Statistics New Zealand website: http://www.stats.govt.nz/Census/2013-census/methodology/confidentiality-how-applied.aspx
Eureka
Newstead
Silverdale
University
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Table 18: 2013 Census - Main means of travel to work
Area Unit Description
2013 Census, main means of travel to work, for the employed census usually resident population count aged 15 years and over(1)
Worked at Home
Did Not Go to Work Today
Drove a Private
Car, Truck or Van
Drove a Company Car, Truck
or Van
Passenger in a Car, Truck, Van or
Company Bus
Public Bus Train
Motor Cycle or Power Cycle
Bicycle Walked or
Jogged Other
Total people stated
Not Elsewhere Included(5)
Total people
Newstead 9 18 57 15 3 3 0 6 9 3 3 123 3 123
Eureka 225 111 558 150 24 3 0 45 9 18 3 1152 33 1182
University 72 393 1020 108 87 87 0 12 81 198 21 2076 96 2172
Silverdale 48 132 561 99 48 36 0 15 30 60 6 1038 30 1065
In comparing percentages of residents who reported travelling by motor vehicle with active transport modes, and public transport we can see
that in the Silverdale CAU; 54% drove a private vehicle to work68, 9.5% drove a company vehicle to work, and 4.6% were a passenger in a
private motor vehicle. In comparison, 2.9% cycled to work, 5.8% walked or jogged and 3.5% were passengers on a public bus.
Of the residents in the Newstead CAU; 46.3% drove a private vehicle to work, 12.2% drove a company vehicle to work and 2.4% (3 people)69
were a passenger in a private motor vehicle. 7.3% of Newstead residents reported cycling to work, 2.4% (3 people) walked or jogged and 2.4%
(3 people) were passengers on a public bus.
Of residents in the Eureka CAU, 48.4% drove a private vehicle to work, and 13% drove a company vehicle and 2.1% were a passenger in a
private motor vehicle. 0.8% of residents in the Eureka CAU reported cycling to work, 1.6% walked or jogged and 0.2% (3 people) were
passengers on a public bus.
Additionally, 19.5% of Eureka residents stated that they worked from home.
68 Note that the total referred to is the ‘total people stated’, or the number of people who answered the question. 69 Note that where the data states that numbers of people walking, cycling, and catching a public bus are ‘3’, this may in fact be a smaller number due to
random rounding to base 3.
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
The following tables provide historical data for previous census years; 2006 and 2001.
Table 19: 2006 Census - Main means of travel to work
Area Unit Description
2006 Census, main means of travel to work, for the employed census usually resident population count aged 15 years and over(1)
Worked at Home
Did Not Go to Work Today
Drove a Private
Car, Truck or
Van
Drove a Company
Car, Truck or
Van
Passenger in a Car,
Truck, Van or
Company Bus
Public Bus
Train
Motor Cycle or Power Cycle
Bicycle Walked or
Jogged Other
Total people stated
Not Elsewher
e Included(5)
Total people
Newstead 15 6 39 18 0 0 0 3 3 6 0 90 6 93
Eureka 243 87 486 129 15 3 0 48 9 21 6 1050 39 1089
University 69 411 1056 108 93 69 0 9 72 216 15 2112 123 2235
Silverdale 45 162 585 72 60 36 0 9 27 75 3 1071 48 1119
Table 20: 2001 Census - Main means of travel to work
Area Unit Description
2001 Census, main means of travel to work, for the employed census usually resident population count aged 15 years and over(1)
Worked at Home
Did Not Go to Work Today
Drove a Private
Car, Truck or
Van
Drove a Company
Car, Truck or
Van
Passenger in a Car,
Truck, Van or
Company Bus
Public Bus
Train
Motor Cycle or Power Cycle
Bicycle Walked or
Jogged Other
Total people stated
Not Elsewher
e Included(5)
Total people
Newstead 15 6 45 6 0 0 0 3 3 9 0 81 3 84
Eureka 294 93 399 78 15 0 0 27 9 27 3 945 18 966
University 63 357 513 48 60 27 3 12 72 201 9 1362 84 1446
Silverdale 69 126 507 60 33 15 0 9 33 69 9 930 24 954
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Public Transport Routes in the Area
The following route maps were downloaded from the Busit website70. These show the routes of public
transport through the Project area. Given that the predominance of settlement, and community
facilities is to the west of the area, most public transport routes are to the west of the area.
Nearest the Project area, public buses travel along Rukakura Road and down Silverdale Road, in both
directions. State Highway 26 is also used by some regional services travelling east to Morrinsville
and Paeroa.
Figure 12: Hamilton Routes
70 Downloaded from : http://www.busit.co.nz/Hamilton-routes/, on 23/07/2014.
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Figure 13: Bus no. 15 – Ruakura Routemap
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Figure 14: Bus no. 23 – Raglan Routemap
Figure 15: Bus no. 22 – Morrinsville/Paeroa Routemap
Appendix 4
Community
Engagement
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Appendix 4 – Community Engagement Introduction
Information from the community of interest was sought in the following ways:
Review of the summary of community consultation contained in the Notices of Requirement71.
Review of previous documentation and reports relevant to the Project to bring the knowledge
gained from the field work into perspective, including:
» Public feedback provided gathered during the most recent open day held on the Project (May
2013).
» Minutes of meetings between other members of the project team and representative of
community groups and businesses.
» Submissions and subsequent submissions on the Ruakura Development (PPC)
Project briefing held in Hamilton with members of the Project team on 27th June 2014.
Face to face interviews and telephone discussions with representatives of residents groups and
community facilities.
Information gathered from the above sources is summarised under the headings below.
Review of Previous Consultation
Review of the summary of community consultation
Review of the summary of community consultation contained in the Notices of Requirement72.
(Refer to the NoR for details).
Public open day feedback
As outlined in the NoR73, public open days were held on the wider Hamilton Section of the Waikato
Expressway, including the Ruakura Interchange on:
February 2011; and
May 2013.
Public feedback provided gathered during two open days held on the Project in February 2011 and
May 2013. The Social Impact Assessor has reviewed community feedback provided by the public at
open days held May 2013. As this consultation was for the full Hamilton Section of the Waikato
Expressway, feedback provided was much wider than the Project scope (as set out in 1.1 Purpose and
Scope of Report). Feedback which was relevant to the Ruakura Interchange included the following:
71 Notice of Requirement to Alter the Designation over the Waikato Expressway, Hamilton Section (February 2014), section n5 72 Notice of Requirement to Alter the Designation over the Waikato Expressway, Hamilton Section (February 2014), section n5 73 Attendees at public open days were provided an option to fill in feedback forms which asked for responses to three general questions about the Hamilton Section of the Waikato Expressway. For further information refer to section 5 of the Notice of Requirement.
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Concern about traffic volumes past schools, especially in Hillcrest and Silverdale, and traffic
volumes along Rukaura Road.
Connectivity and access for Percival and Ryburn Roads to hillcrest and Silverdale
Provision for interchanges at Morrinsville Road (SH26)
The location of connecting roads (to the Interchange) to the east of the Expressway.
Elevation of the Ruakura Interchange and visual impacts.
The feedback forms available at the open days asked the following three general questions about the
Waikato Expressway. Below are some direct quotes provided in response to these questions.
1. Do you support the construction of the Hamilton Section of the Waikato Expressway
“Yes, especially the location of interchanges at Greenhill and Ruakura, not 5th Avenue. This will
have a better outcome for traffic flows.”
“I support the interchange now being proposed away from SH26 and off Ruakura Rd – will
this mean the existing highway will be widened?”
“Yes. But not the closing of Ruakura Road just to accommodate the Tainui proposed
development.”
“Yes in most part – but are unhappy about the placement of the Ruakura I/C [interchange] &
the elevated profile of the carriageway in this area (that will compound noise impacts)”
2. Are there any issues that you believe should be given special consideration in the resource consent
and designation conditions (noise, dust, visual, ecological etc.)
“Connectivity into Silverdale roundabout for Percival / Ryburn Rd residents. Concerned about
elevation going past / over Percival Rd – too high!”
3. Do you have any other further comments on the Hamilton Section?
“By changing the position of the Highway 26 on-ramps to provide the interchange desired by
TGH, NZTA has opened up the southeast locality of Silverdale/Hillcrest to much increased
traffic flows by trucks and cars exiting at Ruakura & transiting past schools & knowledge
centres into the sth-east part of the city. Any models that claim Silverdale Rd will not suffer
will be erroneous.”
[re: traffic on Rukaura Rd] “This will cause problems for the pedestrians / cyclists moving
between the research / Innovation Park / University areas. City needs planning to mitigate
dangers.”
“I like the fact that there are no Morrinsville Road interchanges. I would like the Expressway
to keep below grade past the end of Nevada Road to mitigate engine noise.”
“I believe the interchange at the proposed port area will place more traffic stress on Ruakura
/Silverdale and Ruakura/Knighton Rd roundabouts which are already very busy at peak
times.”
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Summary
Issues relating to connectivity, access and mobility through the area have been highlighted above, as
have potential visual impacts from the elevated Interchange. These effects have been considered in
the assessment of effects (as part of the adapted IAIA framework).
Meeting Minutes
Minutes of meetings held by other members of the project team were reviewed to provide
background on potential social issues, and community groups with an interest in the Interchange.
These included the following:
» Minutes of meetings between (other members of) the project team and private land-owners
located at 11 Davison Road74 .
» Minutes of meetings between (other members of) the project team and LIC, Dairy NZ, and
Newstead Community75
» Minutes of meetings between (other members of) the project team and Ruakura residents76
Private Property at Ruakura Road
The owner had concerns around the ability to subdivide her property77 and based on these concerns
did not want to have the land taken.
Dairy NZ and Livestock Improvements Corporation (LIC)
Dairy NZ and LIC have been operating at this site for a very long time under different names. Very
much part of the Ruakura fabric.
Combined over 600 people work at this site with 85-90% driving to work. Staff come from around
the region meaning that options such as car-pooling and a bus service find little favour with the staff
although they have been considered in order to reduce the number of vehicles at the site. The site is
maxed out in terms of parking. Their staff numbers also fluctuate seasonally with more staff (100+)
being on-site between August and December.
The LIC site experiences peaks in traffic from 8 to 9 am and 4:30 to 5:30 pm, and significant traffic
between site and paddocks in Vaile Rd.
Many of their staff use a nearby recreational walking track between SH26 and Vaile Road at lunch
time.
Newstead Community group
The community group questioned the need for the inland port at Ruakura, and general concern about
traffic on Ruakura Rd and the safety of the intersection with Vaile Rd.
74 Meeting held on 10/02/2014. 75 Meetings held on: 06/06/2013 with Dairy NZ and LIC, and on 21/07/2014. 20/05/2013 with Newstead Community group. 76 Meeting held 17/04/2014. 77 Note that subdivision would be a non-complying activity under the rules of the District Plan regardless of whether land is taken or not.
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Ruakura Residents
The group expressed concerns the impact of the increase in traffic volumes, in particular HCVs along
the stretch between the Morrinsville Road and the link to the interchange, including
Safety along the road and specifically at their entrances
Safety at the intersection with the Morrinsville Road
Safety at the Davison/Vaile Road intersection
Road noise
Effects on entrances to LIC
Effects on property values
At the time of the meeting some members of the group were not aware of the layout for the proposed
Interchange.
Summary
Concerns raised in meetings held by the project team focussed on the potential for increased traffic
volumes on local roads and congestion at locations such as near LIC and intersections (Vaile Road
and SH26/Morrinsville Road).
Submissions and subsequent submissions on the Ruakura Development (PPC)
Potentially relevant concerns which were raised in submissions on the Rukaura Development (PPC)
included:
visual impacts, and increased lighting/glare;
air quality from vehicle emissions (mainly from the proposed inland port);
increased traffic volumes on local roads; and
cumulative effects from uncertainty over the projects and potentially from multiple construction
efforts in close proximity / time period.
Concerns were also expressed about severance; two submissions from the Percival/Ryburn area
specifically expressed concerns about the severance of Ruakura Road, and the effect of this on local
connectivity.
Direct social investigation
Project briefing and site visit
A site visit to the Project area was carried out with members of the Project team on 27th June 2014.
The purpose of the visit was to identify the approximate locations where the Waikato Expressway is
designated, and what changes the addition of the proposed Interchange will make to the roading
environment and surrounding area.
Community Meetings and Discussions
As outlined above in 3.4.1 Community Profile, specific social engagement was carried out with a
number of parties as part of this assessment. The amount of time available to carry out the social
engagement was restricted by school holidays and engagement with the school in the local area were
carried out via telephone conversations and email. Discussions with both school and residential
group representatives were largely unstructured, and in part, directed by the topics that participants
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
wished to discuss. Certain questions and issues were, however, addressed at each, and these are
listed below.
Types of questions asked of community groups:
When did your group form / how long have you been an association?
How many members do you have?
What would you say is the main objective / goals for your group
Do you think that your group will benefit from this project?
Does your group have any concerns related to the project?
Is there any mitigation that you can think of that would address or reduce these issues?
Types of questions asked of educational facilities:
Where does your student population come from?
How do students arrive at school?
Are there any existing issues related to safety before/after school?
Do you think that your school will benefit from this project?
Does your school have any concerns related to the project?
Is there any mitigation that you can think of that would address or reduce these issues?
Discussion with Newstead Country Pre-school
A telephone conversation was held with the owner of Newstead Country Pre-school about the
Interchange Project78. The owner was aware of the Interchange, in relation to the Hamilton Section
of the Waikato Expressway, and the changes that it would make to the roading network. The owner’s
main area of concern was related to traffic volumes along Vaile Road. She indicated that she
understood that traffic would not increase along Vaile Road as a result of the Interchange, but that
safety for their children was important as they sometimes walk with children along Vaile Road to
access the Newstead Walkway which links to Newstead Model Country School on Morrinsville Road.
The owner mentioned that this pathway forms a loop connecting Vaile Road, Ruakura Road and
Morrinsville Road, which is a popular recreational jogging track, especially for staff from Livestock
Improvements (on the corner of Morrinsville and Ruakura Roads). The pre-school has a current roll
of 37 children, who mainly come from Hamilton, although some also live rurally. Many of the
children attending have parents who work at Livestock Improvements.
Discussion with St Matthew’s Catholic Church
A phone discussion was held with the office manager of St Matthew’s Catholic Church79 (the parish
is currently appointing a new priest).
Parishioners mainly arrive at the church by car, and most come from the University area, Hillcrest
and Silverdale. Some parishioners come from further afield; towards Morrinsville and Cambridge.
Few parishioners come from north of Ruakura Road. The church has few existing issues with
congestion around the church, although they experience busy times at the start and end of the school
day, as parents of neighbouring Silverdale Normal School use the church carpark to drop-off and
pick-up children in private vehicles.
78 Telephone conversation held 15/07/2014. 79 Telephone call to St Matthew’s Catholic Church, 16/07/2014.
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
The office manager was not very aware of the Ruakura Interchange project, and information was
emailed to her to give her an opportunity to respond.
Meeting with Waikato University
A meeting was held with Waikato University’s Facilities Manager80 in order to discuss any particular
concerns or issues related to the proposed project from a social perspective.
Students attending the University mainly live off-campus (approximately 60%), in the local area
(Knighton/Hillcrest/Nevada Road), and walk or drive to University (although cycling is seeing a
small resurgence). There is some congestion at busy times, although the facilities manager pointed
out that Waikato University has more carparking facilities that any other NZ campus.
The facilities manager was familiar with the proposed Interchange, and the alterations that it would
make to the local roading environment. He was also familiar with TGH’s private plan change for the
Ruakura Development.
The University’s preference was for an interchange at SH26, although the facilities manager
acknowledged that there may be some benefits to the University in terms of increased capacity along
(the southern end of) Silverdale Road as a result of the Ruakura Interchange.
With regard to the potential effects of the Interchange, he expected that (as a result of the proposed
Ruakura development) there would be a large proportion of freight via road / trucks rather than rail
(initially), and that this traffic would come via the Expressway in preference of Silverdale Road as a
result of the Interchange at Ruakura Road (instead of SH26). As a result, the facilities manager
thought that there would be more traffic on Ruakura Road, past the University, and more associated
noise from traffic. There are no residential uses at the northern end of the campus (along Ruakura
Road), but there is a college hall on Silverdale Road near the intersection with Hillcrest Road.
Assuming traffic flows smoothly, noise would be the biggest impact on the University, particularly
the student residences. He pointed out that the University had engaged an independent noise
assessor in relation to the PPC, and their assessment was that noise increases would be within
acceptable levels.
Noting that the Ruakura Interchange proposes to turn the northern end of Silverdale Road into a
cul-de-sac (and would not have direct access onto Ruakura Road), the facilities manager pointed out
that University staff drive from this end of the campus to other parts of the University via Ruakura
Road. He noted that a slip-lane for university use only would be beneficial. Craig pointed out that
from the agencies perspective they would want to ensure that this couldn’t become a ‘rat-run’ for
traffic avoiding the intersection of the new Ruakura Road with the existing Ruakura Road heading
west (city-bound).
In conclusion, the expected construction timeframes for the project were discussed in context of the
expected timeframes for the Ruakura Development, and Craig noted that the Interchange project is
expected to be notified in September, shortly after the interim decision on the Ruakura Development
PPC.
80 Meeting minutes, re: Ruakura Interchange and social issues, Waikato University Facilities Manager, 9:30am, 17 July, 2014.
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Meeting with Ruakura Residents Group
A meeting was held with representatives of the Ruakura Residents Group81 in order to discuss any
particular concerns or issues related to the proposed project from a social perspective.
The Ruakura Residents Group formed in response to the Rukaura Development, and submitted on
the private plan change. The implications of this development for the neighbourhood are a key issue
for the group. The main objectives of this group are the protection of their lifestyle; their property
values and accessibility.
One of the key concerns of this group at the time of speaking to them was a lack of consultation with
residents of the Percival/Ryburn Road area on other projects such as the Proposed Hamilton city
District Plan and the Ruakura Development. The group felt that there were constant changes within
the projects themselves, and that unless they were directly adjacent to the route, that they wouldn’t
hear about them.
Among the group, there were different feelings about what the Interchange project would mean for
them, specific points raised included:
A need for greater clarity about the timing of projects, and an ability to influence decisions
Removal of cycling access along the existing Ruakura Road as a result of the Interchange severing
the road
Potential for noise (and vibration) effects to private property as a result of increased traffic
volumes including heavy vehicles
Implications for cumulative noise levels from both the Interchange and Ruakura Development
(Craig pointed out that the Ruakura Development is part of the assessment baseline for the
Notice of Requirement, and the assessment will take this into account)
Future access for residents to Silverdale/Hillcrest and Hamilton City
Potential for visual effects (including light spill) to private properties as a result of the
Interchange
Potential effects to local businesses due to:
» the loss of access between the two sides of Ruakura Road;
» increased travel distances from the western side of the Expressway to Morrinsville;
» loss of existing signage on the side of the road; and
» the cumulative effect of these changes
Implications for changed access to future school zoning for residents
The severance of the existing Ruakura Road was discussed, including possible alternative ways of
providing access. The provision of continued east-west access was generally seen as desirable by the
group, although it was acknowledged that there were challenges in achieving this.
Members of the group felt that it would be useful to see visualisations of the Expressway (at the
Ruakura Road / railway over-bridge).
Improved communication from the project generally would also help to address some of the group’s
questions and lack of clarity about what is happening in the area.
81 Meeting minutes, re: Ruakura Interchange and social issues, Ruakura Residents Group, 11:30am, 17 July, 2014.
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
The group asked for more information about why this particular option was proposed. Other
questions were asked about the project as well, including
Who has the authority to close Ruakura Road?
What will the over-bridge over the existing Ruakura Road / railway look like?
» How high will it be?
Meeting with Silverdale Residents Group
A meeting was held with representatives of the Silverdale Residents Group82 in order to discuss any
particular concerns or issues related to the proposed project.
A meeting was held with representatives of the Silverdale Residents Group in order to discuss any
particular concerns or issues related to the proposed project from a social perspective.
The Silverdale Residents Group formed in response to the Ruakura Development / Hamilton Section
of the Waikato Expressway, and submitted on the private plan change.
The Silverdale Residents Group has a particular interest in the flora and fauna of the area. Most
members (not all) of the group live at the far end of Nevada Road, and there are eight properties
close to the extent of the designation.
One of the key concerns of this group at the time of speaking to them was to reduce/minimise the
impacts of changes happening in the area (for example changes to noise levels, changes to visual
outlook).
The group were aware of the project, but had seen different versions of plans for the Interchange and
weren’t certain what was now proposed.
The group also take an interest in the stormwater / runoff from the Expressway and Interchange,
and have concerns about impacts to water quality and the surrounding ecology of the area as a result.
In reviewing high level plans for the Interchange members felt that the designation of stormwater
ponds was positive, as this ensured that there would be green space that would not be developed.
The main concern of the group was the noise impacts, and visual impacts although they
acknowledged that this was very much tied up with the proposed development of the inland port at
Ruakura.
Meeting with Newstead Residents Association
A meeting was held with representatives of the Newstead Residents Association83 in order to discuss
any particular concerns or issues related to the proposed project.
This group has been in existence since approximately 1994, and has around 150 current members,
although membership numbers vary at different times. The main focus of the association is to
provide support to individual members by addressing issues as a group. Key concerns for the group
82 Meeting minutes, re: Ruakura Interchange and social issues, Silverdale Residents Group, 1:30pm, 17 July, 2014. 83 Meeting minutes, re: Ruakura Interchange and social issues, Newstead Residents Association, 3:30pm, 17 July, 2014.
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
are the preservation of the amenity and peaceful country lifestyle of the Newstead area, and the
neighbourhood’s property values.
At the meeting the discussion covered a previous meeting with the NZTA and members of the project
team, where alternative options to the currently proposed alignment for the Ruakura Interchange
were discussed. One option in particular was of interest to the group as it would provide an
alternative access for heavy vehicles, thereby avoiding parts of SH26, and Ruakura Road. The
reasoning behind the currently preferred route was discussed, and the groups preferences in terms
of connecting to the Hamilton Section of the Waikato Expressway. It was requested that Opus
follow-up with the Newstead residents, by providing consideration to the alternative option they
discussed, which Dave Heine agreed to do84.
One of the key issues which the group had with the proposed Interchange, was the potential for
increased noise and vibration at private residences, especially those along Ruakura Road and the
intersection with SH26, as a result of increased traffic volumes, and increased heavy freight vehicles
(engine braking, acceleration and stopping and starting along the route). The group felt that such
increases would affect their individual residential amenity, and the amenity of their neighbourhood
in general, and were concerned about the impact that this would have on private property values as
a result.
Concerns were also expressed about the safety of the road(s), both for motorists and pedestrians,
such as pupils of nearby Newstead Model Country School. This was a particular concern for the
intersection of SH26, Ruakura Road and Lisette Road, where road accidents have already resulted
in fatalities.
Members of the group expressed particular frustration at the level of consultation that had been
carried out with them on development of this Project, and previous projects. The group pointed out
that changes to plans over time have caused them a great deal of uncertainty as property owners
about what would happen to their area.
In addition to the above concerns about the route selection and safety, concerns were also raised in
terms of :
Potential visual effects, such as light spill onto properties, and
the potential for congestion problems at the intersection of SH26, particularly considering truck
movements in and out of Livestock Improvements, which already causes heavy periods of traffic
at times.
Discussion with TKKM o Toku Mapihi Maurea
A telephone discussion was held with the principal of TKKM o Toku Mapihi Maurea85 about the
Ruakura Interchange project.
Students of TKKM o Toku Mapihi Maurea are not all locally based, and come from all around the
wider Hamilton area. Students mainly arrive at school by car (approximately 95%). Some local
students walk to school (approximately 3%) and some by bus (approximately 2%). The staff carpark
is very small, and parents mainly drop children off outside the school gates on Silverdale Road.
Students who come via bus have to cross over Silverdale Road to get to school, and the nearest zebra
84 Dave Heine emailed members of the Residents Association on 23/07/2014. 85 Telephone call to TKKM o Toku Mapihi Maurea, on 23/07/2014.
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
crossing is 600m86 away in front of the Silverdale shops. The school has an informal arrangement
with the bus company, for students to stay on the bus until it has turned around to go in the other
direction, and they disembark the bus on the same side of the road as the school.
The principal was aware of the project, and discussed it (in the context of the wider Waikato
Expressway) at a board meeting last year. The school expressed concerns about traffic volumes on
Silverdale Road. At this time the council carried out a survey of traffic and pedestrian (student)
movements, and made recommendations to the school around signage at the staff carpark, and a
road safety programme for the school to carry out with their pupils. The possibility of using Waikato
University’s Gate 10 carpark as a drop-off / pick-up location for parents in private motor vehicles
was discussed, but the school felt that this carpark was already very busy, and was out of the way for
parents to access.
With regard to the current project, the school would have concerns regarding about the effect of
increased traffic volumes on road safety, especially for children crossing over Silverdale Road.
The principal acknowledged that there may be benefits in terms of mobility and accessibility through
the area for some of the parents of students at the school, but did not feel that the school operation
would benefit from the project.
Discussion with Newstead Model Country School
A telephone discussion was held with the principal of Newstead Model Country School87 about the
Ruakura Interchange project.
This school mostly attracts students from Hamilton (approximately 70-80%) , where parents chose
to send their children to a country school. The remainder of students come from the surrounding
rural areas. The school is open for supervision from 8am, and runs an after school case programme
until 5:30pm.
Almost all of the school’s students are dropped off by their parents in private vehicles. The principal
mentioned that the school has a ‘drop-off procedure’ which seems to work fairly well. Parents drive
up the school driveway to the parking area, and then walk children up to the school door. At the end
of the day, parents drive in and park, and collect their children from the front of the school.
There is a school bus which collects about 15 children who live to the east of the school. The bus
parks in a bay at the front of the school (on the same side of the road), and collects children at the
end of the day.
Morrinsville Road is very busy, and none of the students walk or cycle to school. He mentioned that
families have always commuted to the school, possibly because it is accessibility to Hamilton, and to
Morrinsville.
The principal was not very aware of the Ruakura Interchange project and information was emailed
to him, to provide an opportunity to respond to the project.
86 Note that it is approximately 500m from the bus stop down to the zebra crossing, and back to the school gate, and students would still need to cross over Carrington Avenue. 87 Telephone call to Newstead model Country School, on 23/07/2014.
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Discussion with Silverdale Normal School
A telephone discussion was held with the principal of Silverdale Normal School88 about the Ruakura
Interchange project.
Most students who attend the school come from the east side of Silverdale Road and from the area
between Silverdale Road and Masters Ave. Some students come from the other side of SH26,
although numbers are decreasing which seems to be because there isn’t a safe crossing over/under
the state highway (there are underpasses for other local schools, but not for SNS) . A few students
also come from the Ruakura Rd east area, though not many. Approximately 50% of students at
Silverdale Normal walk to school . Few students cycle to school – the school does not encourage this
mode, as it is not considered to be safe. The remainder of students arrive in parents vehicles. The
school also offers before and after school care. Children are mainly collected from afterschool care
by parents in private motor vehicles, and collection times are staggered from 3-5:30pm. The busiest
times (in terms of student movements) are:
Between 8:30-9am.
3pm.
With regard to the proposed Interchange, the principal made the following observations, but noted
that there was not a current Board of Trustees, so these reflected her own opinions only.
If the Interchange results in a reduction of traffic in front of the school, that this would be good for
the school.
Before construction was completed, there could be several years of construction, and the principal
was concerned about the effect of construction traffic, especially heavy vehicles travelling past the
school, and the length of the construction period.
She mentioned that if construction vehicles could be routed away from Silverdale Road that this
would help.
Discussion with Willowbrook Park
A telephone discussion was held with the owner of Willowbrook Park 89 about the Ruakura
Interchange project. The owners had heard about the project through neighbours, and had met with
members of the project team.
The owners of Willowbrook Park intend to open in early 2015, and own a site which is bordered by
Ruakura Road and Vaile Road. Their facility will provide a venue for upmarket garden weddings and
boutique luxury accommodation, catering for a maximum of 50 guests at a time. The venue will have
between 2 and 10 staff (for events) onsite, and will operate between 10am-midnight, on any day of
the week for weddings and between 4pm to 10am 7 days a week for accommodation.
Events could be either indoor or outdoor, and the owners expressed concerns about the potential for
increased traffic flow, especially heavy good vehicles, to generate noise pollution which they felt
would be intrusive and have a detrimental impact on their ability to offer garden weddings and
peaceful accommodation. The owners were also concerned about possible light pollution from the
project.
88 Telephone call to Silverdale Normal School, on 28/07/2014. 89 Telephone call to owner of Willowbrook Park and email correspondence, 20/08/2014.
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
“We are due to open a 5 star accommodation and wedding venue in 4 months in what was
to be a beautiful and tranquil environment.”
The owners felt that the positioning of the Interchange, and the closure of existing Ruakura Road to
through-traffic (currently their easiest access to the university and claudelands area) could prevent
them from getting any benefit from the project.
In terms of potential mitigations, the owners indicated they would like the project to volunteer light
and noise mitigating measures along the length of their boundary with Ruakura Road and would
appreciate meeting with the project team to discuss possible options when at the appropriate stage
of development.
Appendix 5
Review of Technical
Reports
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Appendix 5 – Review of Technical
Reports A suite of technical reports have been prepared to help inform the Notice of Requirement to alter the
designation over the Hamilton Section of the Waikato Expressway. Of these, the following technical
reports have been reviewed ‘through a social lens’ as relevant to assessing the potential social effects
of the proposed Interchange:
transport and traffic
landscape visual and urban
noise
archaeology
air quality
vibration
position statement prepared by tāngata whenua
A summary of these technical reports is provided below.
Assessment of Transport and Traffic
An assessment of the traffic effects of the project was carried out90. This assessment looks at changes
to the predicted traffic flows on the road network, at the function and performance of intersections,
at property access and at alternative modes of transport. The overall findings of the assessment
were:
All NOR intersections are expected to operate at least as well as the Baseline and also meet the
Project and PPC Level of Service criteria
Overall safety of the existing intersection on Relocated Ruakura Road and Ruakura Road is
expected to be no worse with the NOR than will occur under the Baseline.
A right turn bay for Vaile/Davison Road intersection will provide a safer environment for
turning vehicles than is offered by the existing intersection,
Effects on alternative modes of transport are expected to be positive due to the inclusion of
shared off road facilities along Relocated Ruakura Road, and a concrete pathway between Vaile
Road and SH26,
There are no expected effects on public transport,
There is not expected to be more than minor effects on property access for residents on
Ruakura Road (south of Vaile Road) as a result of increased traffic flows
Network effects for travel to the south and east for Percival and Ryburn Road residents is not
expected to be more than minor when all trips are considered.
The NOR provides a positive overall contribution to the network efficiency by providing a direct
connection between the PPC and Waikato Expressway, and removes heavy commercial vehicles
of local roads such as Wairere Drive and Cambridge Road.
90 Waikato Expressway; Hamilton Section, – Ruakura Interchange: Assessment of Traffic Effects, 25 August, 2014.
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Assessment of Landscape, Visual and Urban Design Effects
An assessment of the landscape, visual and urban design (LVUD) effects of the Ruakura Interchange
was carried out91, based on identifying effects of the proposed designation alterations over and above
the effects already anticipated by the existing designation for the Hamilton Section of the Waikato
Expressway. The overall finding of this assessment is that any landscape, visual or urban design
effects can be adequately mitigated and the alteration to designation for the Ruakura Interchange
(and associated connecting roads) can be achieved without any significant landscape, visual or urban
design effects.
The assessment draws specific conclusions about sections of the proposed Interchange; and
recommended mitigations. These are described in terms of the project sections assessed.
Closure of part of Ruakura Road
No significant landscape, visual or urban design effects as a result of the closure of the existing
Ruakura Road adjacent to the Expressway, as the realigned Ruakura Road will ensure maintained
connectivity with Hamilton City, the Expressway and SH26.
Realignment of Ruakura Road
Low landscape and visual effects, due to the minimal earthworks and vegetation removal required.
A moderate to low visual effect to properties along Ruakura Road east of the Expressway, from the
visibility of the traffic utilising the road, which will be constructed close to existing grade and seen in
the context of the Expressway.
Improved connectivity (including pedestrian/cycling facilities) and efficient land development
opportunities of the adjacent land enabled, due to the realignment of Ruakura Road integrating into
the existing pattern and form of the area.
Ruakura Interchange
Minor visual effects to the east of the Expressway, as the Interchange will be discernable from limited
properties and local roads in the immediate vicinity.
An interim low visual effect to the west of the Expressway, as the Interchange and realigned Ruakura
Road will be able to be viewed from some locations until the PPC area is constructed.
Permanent effects will be limited to 410 and 414 Ruakura Road, and from public roads in close
proximity to the east of the Expressway.
Removal of heavy vehicles from local roads, due to the Interchange providing direct access to the
Expressway.
In terms of the option to build the Expressway over (realigned) Ruakura Road, or vice versa, the
assessment finds that the former option is preferable, as it creates more opportunity for a ‘gateway’
entrance to the area, and better ‘at grade’ pedestrian and cycling connections.
91 Waikato Expressway; Hamilton Section, – Ruakura Interchange Assessment of Landscape, Visual and Urban Design Effects, 28 July 2014.
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Removal of SH26 Interchange
A marginal positive effect on landscape and visual amenity with respect to changes to landform, land
use and land cover, due to the removal of the SH26 interchange.
Minimal positive effect on urban design, as access and connectivity maintained through local roads.
Some benefits for Expressway users, as a result of reduced earthworks and continuous planting along
the embankments.
No discernable visual changes to properties nearby, as the Expressway will be below grade.
Proposed Mitigation Measures
In terms of mitigating measures, the LVUD assessment92 refers to the following:
Landscape mitigation to the east will utilise occasional groups of trees and hedgerows along
the alignment, which will reflect the sparsely vegetated character of the open rural
environment.
Around the Interchange, planting will be used to soften on/off ramps and embankments and
complement the ‘gateway’ environment of the future Ruakura Development.
In support of this, the overpass bridge will be slender and elegant, relative to span and will
have a moderate to high aesthetic quality in form and finish. It will integrate with the ‘family’
of bridges that occur along the Expressway.
To the west, landscape mitigation will respond to the character of the large scale PPC area.
As such, mitigation measures will need to be developed at a later stage in conjunction with a
comprehensive PPC area Master Plan in order to be consistent with the overall objectives for
the development.
The findings of the landscape, visual and urban design assessment are accepted from a social
perspective. It is noted that landscaping treatments to the east of the Expressway are proposed, and
that detailed mitigation to the west of the Expressway will need to be addressed in future once the
Ruakura Masterplan has been prepared.
Assessment of Noise Effects
An assessment of the noise effects of the Ruakura Interchange was carried out93, based on identifying
effects of the proposed designation alterations over and above the effects already anticipated by the
existing designation for the Hamilton Section of the Waikato Expressway.
Operation
The noise assessment found that the operational noise levels with the proposed designation
alterations would be very similar to those noise levels with the Hamilton Section of the Waikato
92 Waikato Expressway; Hamilton Section, – Ruakura Interchange Assessment of Landscape, Visual and Urban Design Effects, 28 July 2014. p.16. 93 Waikato Expressway; Hamilton Section, – Ruakura Interchange Assessment of Noise Effects, 18 July 2014.
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Expressway as already designated. The conditions proposed for the designation alterations and the
conditions for the existing designation both use the same noise criteria (from the Noise Guidelines).
The assessment identifies individual properties where without mitigation noise levels would be
expected to exceed their applicable noise limit and identifies these exceedances are consistent with
the exceedances expected with the existing designation without mitigation. The noise assessment
concludes that for both the designated route and the proposed designation alterations, the noise
criteria can be achieved with mitigation, subject to practicability, and the extent of mitigation is
similar.
The noise assessment found that the operational noise effects of the proposed designation alterations
are considered no more than minor.
Construction
The conditions proposed for the designation alterations and the conditions for the existing
designation require a Construction Management Plan that addresses the requirements of the New
Zealand Standard for construction noise. That standard outlines the requirements of a Construction
Noise Management Plan (CNMP).
The noise assessment found the noise of activities for construction of the existing designation will be
of the same scale and nature as noise with the proposed designation alterations; and therefore the
management of effects will also be of the same scale and nature. The noise assessment considers that
with appropriate preparation and implementation of a CNMP noise effects from construction can be
managed to be reasonable.
The findings of the noise assessment are accepted from a social perspective, and it is noted that
construction-related noise with the Interchange are considered to be reasonable.
Assessment of Archaeological Effects
An archaeological assessment of the Ruakura Interchange was carried out94, including a historic map
search; search of NZAA database of recorded archaeological sites; and a field visit.
The assessment found no structures or dwellings or historic features of historical or pre-European
interest indicated on plans dated 1865 or 1902. It also found no recorded archaeological sites close
to the study area; and that the closest recorded site was approximately 700m south-east of the
proposal. In a field visit, the assessment found no historic features, or pre-historic features in the
site area. The overall conclusion of the archaeological assessment was that the study area holds no
known archaeological or historic values and no known reasons to alter or modify the proposal on
archaeological grounds.
The findings of the archaeological assessment are accepted from a social perspective, and it is noted
that no specific modifications or mitigations are proposed by the archaeological specialist.
94 Memo ‘Ruakura Interchange – Alteration to Designation’, Keith, S, dated 14/07/2014.
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
Assessment of Air Quality Effects
An assessment of air quality effects resulting from the construction and operation of the proposed
Ruakura Interchange95 was carried out, through a desktop investigation of potential dust emissions
from earthworks during construction and vehicle emissions from traffic flows during the operation
of the Interchange and connecting roads. The air quality assessment made the following assessments
with regards to construction and operational effects.
Construction
The air quality assessment found that effects from fugitive dust emissions could potentially affect
properties and residential dwellings within approximately 300m from construction activities. The
nearest residential dwellings will be located more than 300 metres from the Interchange, and the
assessment concluded that there will be no dust effects beyond the distance of 300 metres from the
Interchange. The assessment proposes a number of measures to control potential dust emmissions
during construction96 to be included in the Construction Management Plan (CMP). The assessment
concludes that with mitigation measures implemented during construction, dust emissions from
construction activities will be appropriately mitigated and that the effect of these emissions on the
local environment will be minor.
Operation
The air quality report considered that the ambient air concentrations at the assessment sites will
remain at the same levels after construction of the Interchange, and that there is no air quality risk
for residential properties located in the project area as a result of the proposed Interchange. It also
concluded that beyond the areas adjacent to the project, air quality will remain approximately the
same depending on the amount of traffic on local roads and further residential development in these
areas.
It is noted that the air quality assessment proposes a range of measures to mitigate construction
effects to air quality, and that no mitigation measures are proposed once the proposed Interchange
is operational. The findings of the air quality assessment are accepted from a social perspective.
Assessment of Vibration Effects
An assessment of vibration effects resulting from the construction and operation of the proposed
Ruakura Interchange was carried out97, through a desk based study. The vibration report made the
following assessments with regards to construction and operational effects.
Construction
There is the potential for adverse effects from construction-related vibration, particularly from piling
(to enable construction of piers for the interchange) and general earthworks associated with
formation of the road. The effects identified by the vibration assessment are:
95 Waikato Expressway: Hamilton Section – Ruakura Interchange Assessment of Air Quality Effects’, 5 August, 2014. 96 For details refer to section 2.3 of the air quality assessment; Waikato Expressway: Hamilton Section – Ruakura Interchange Assessment of Air Quality Effects, 5 August, 2014, pp.12-13. 97 Waikato Expressway: Hamilton Section – Ruakura Interchange Assessment of Vibration Effects, 24 July, 2014.
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
potential disturbance of occupants of residential buildings bordering the new route; and
potential for damage to two identified buildings (63 Ryburn Road and 3 Vaile Road) if
inappropriate earthmoving equipment is operated close to the boundary.
The assessment concludes that these effects will be minor or less, if appropriately mitigated through
the implementation of a Construction Vibration Management Plan (CVMP), specifically relating to:
selection of equipment and processes;
location and operation of the equipment;
sequencing of operations; and
construction activity associated with local road connections, specifically Ruakura Road, Ryburn
Road, Vaile Road and SH26 (Morrinsville Road).
The vibration analysis also notes that construction over areas of peaty soil can result in problematic
vibrations, and recommends specific additions to the existing Waikato Expressway; Hamilton
Section conditions to manage this98.
Operation
The assessment considers that building occupants will not be disturbed by ground vibrations
resulting from the operation of the Ruakura Interchange, as all existing residential properties are
sited 8m or more away from the closest trafficked lane, and this is considered a sufficient separation
distance. The assessment therefore proposes no specific mitigation for operational traffic- induced
vibrations as a result of the Interchange.
The vibration assessment also notes that from a vibrations perspective, there is no difference
between the ‘over’ and ‘under’ interchange options.
The findings of the vibration assessment are accepted from a social perspective.
Position Statement from Tāngata Whenua Working Group
A Tāngata Whenua Working Group (TWWG) established to participate in, and contribute to
decision-making processes for the Hamilton Section of the Waikato Expressway. The TWWG
provided a position statement for the Hamilton Section project99, which encompasses the Ruakura
Interchange project area, and the position statement includes an acknowledgement of plans to
service the proposed Ruakura Structure Plan with a full diamond interchange.
The position statement outlines participation in the (Hamilton Expressway) project decision-making
processes as at 30 September, 2013. It acknowledges the need for, and benefits of the project and
that some effects on ecological areas and wāhi tapu are unavoidable. The position statement also
acknowledges the “restoration and management approach of the NZTA” as “welcomed by tāngata
whenua.” This statement also outlines a number of mitigation measures which may be included,
regarding potential environmental and ecological effects.
98 For specific recommendations, refer to the proposed conditions contained in section 6 of the assessment; Waikato Expressway: Hamilton Section – Ruakura Interchange Assessment of Vibration Effects, 24 July, 2014, p.26. 99 Position Statement for the Hamilton Section of the Waikato Expressway, Tāngata Whenua Working Group, 30 September 2013.
Ruakura Interchange
2-31695.00 | August 2014 Opus International Consultants Ltd
The overall conclusion of the position statement in to emphasise the importance of participation and
unity of all parties involved throughout the process.
The position statement has not been updated with regard to the proposed Ruakura Interchange
Project, and the contents of the TWWG position statement are relied on for the purposes of this social
impact assessment.
It is noted that NZTA have maintained an ongoing relationship with the TWWG throughout the
development of the Ruakura Interchange project, and that condition 9c of the existing designation
requires that the project team work with TWWG on a Waikato Tanui Mitigation Plan.
The findings of all technical reports outlined above are accepted from a social perspective, and are
relied on for the purposes of this social impact assessment.
Opus International Consultants Ltd L8, Majestic Centre, 100 Willis St PO Box 12 003, Thorndon, Wellington 6144 New Zealand t: +64 4 471 7000 f: +64 4 499 3699 w: www.opus.co.nz