W ORKGROUP D ISCUSSION Provider Ad Hoc Workgroup, Advisory Committee on Breast Cancer in Young Women...
-
Upload
alfred-crawford -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of W ORKGROUP D ISCUSSION Provider Ad Hoc Workgroup, Advisory Committee on Breast Cancer in Young Women...
WORKGROUP DISCUSSION
Provider Ad Hoc Workgroup,
Advisory Committee on Breast Cancer in Young Women
December 13, 2012
MEMBERS
Generosa Grana* Brandon Hayes–Lattin* Renee Nicholas Wendy Susswein* Karen Kelly Thomas* Laura Tillman JoAnne Zujewski
CHARGE Gather initial background information and to
advise the Committee regarding behavior change of providers as relates to:
1. Enhancing provider knowledge regarding breast cancer in young women
Assessing gaps, guidelines, and issues messaging regarding breast cancer in young women.
2. Improving skills of providers regarding delivery of care to young women at risk (average risk and high risk) of– and/or facing breast cancer (e.g., Survivors).
“Providers” to be defined.
PATIENT POPULATIONS
Women of Reproductive Age (up to 45 years) PreDiagnosis
Average Risk High Risk (including risk for relapse or second
primary) PostDiagnosis
PROVIDERS
PreDiagnosis and Early Diagnosis (Primary Care) Primary Care Physicians
General Practice Family Practice Internal Medicine Obstetrics/Gynecology
Primary Care Nurse Practitioners/Physician Assistants
High School and College School Nurses
PROVIDERS
Post–Diagnosis Oncologists
Medical Oncology Surgical Oncology Radiation Oncology
Oncology Nursing Primary Care Providers (including transitions)
PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES AND NETWORKS(POTENTIAL PARTNERS TO REACH PROVIDERS)
American College Health Association (ACHA) American Academy of Family Practice (AAFP) American College of Physicians (ACP) American Congress of Obstetricians and
Gynecologists (ACOG) American Academy of Nurse Practitioners
(AANP) American Academy of Physician Assistants
(AAPA)
PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES AND NETWORKS
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) American College of Surgeons (ACoS) American Society for Radiation Oncology
(ASTRO) Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) National Comprehensive Cancer Network
(NCCN)
ASSESSMENT OF FACTORS FOR BEHAVIOR CHANGEBRANDON HAYESLATTIN
Knowledge Training, Continuing Education
Resources Guidelines, Materials
Skills Communication
Access Utilization/Opportunities for Engagement
Accountability Quality Assurance
AVAILABLE GUIDELINES
Screening ACOG ACP AAFP ASCO ACoS NCCN
Practice ACHA AAFP ACOG ACP ASCO ACoS ASTRO NCCN ONS
OPPORTUNITIES FOR ENGAGEMENT
Sexually active women Pregnant women During Breastfeeding Taking a Family history Assessing chronic medical conditions
(high blood pressure, diabetes, hyperlipidemia)
NCCN CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE: PRE–DIAGNOSIS
Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Normal Risk, Modified Gail Model Increased Risk Positive Physical Findings
Palpable Mass Age >29 Palpable Mass Age <30
Breast Cancer Risk Reduction Familial Risk Assessment Risk Reduction Therapy
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS FOR GROUP
How can we better assess the knowledge base of providers?
How can we assure appropriate resources are developed and used? How can we integrate with quality assessment/improvement efforts?
How can we better assess provider skills in resource utilization and communication?
How can we improve patient access and utilization?
HEALTHCARE PROVIDERSCURRENT STATUS
Genetic Counseling Services
Variation in:• Referral for genetic consultation• Appropriateness of referrals• Communication of risk information
Work done by CDC researchers: • DOCstyles 2007 National Survey (Bellcross et al)• Vignette based survey instrument (Trivers et al)
HEALTHCARE PROVIDERSCURRENT STATUS
Bellcross et al. Am J Prev Med 2011 Determine, among U.S. primary care physicians, the level
of awareness and utilization of BRCA testing and the 2005 us preventive services task force recommendations.
Web based survey “DocStyles 2007” – CDC licensed data Random sample of 3115 physicians. Response rate 48% Asked about actually ordering at least 1 test – did not ask
about referral for genetic counseling / testing, provision of counseling or “implementation of management recommendations”
Potential use of DocStyles for assessment of chemoprevention & screening recommendation use???
HEALTHCARE PROVIDERSCURRENT STATUS
Trivers et al. Cancer 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine 2012
Vignettebased survey instrument
High risk women – 41% of physicians referred for counseling, testing and ovarian screening
Average risk women – 22% of women still referred for genetic counseling
HEALTHCARE PROVIDERSCURRENT STATUS
Chemoprevention
NHIS 2000 data >10million women aged 3579 risk eligible for
tamoxifen
>2million White women risk / benefit analysis positive
Actual use: 2000 – 0.2% 2005 – 0.08%
CURRENT STATEPATIENTS
Uptake rates for breast cancer genetic testing.
Olaya et al. Am Journal of Surgery, 2009. Half of patients referred for genetic testing
do not undergo testing. Unrelated to insurance coverage for testing. Affected by weather previously diagnosed
or not and by educational level. Need for counseling instruments to improve
testing rates.
POTENTIAL OPPORTUNITIES TO IMPACT HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS
I. Training of students, residents & other healthcare providers (NP, PA)
Modules to be used in training – genetics, communication skills, clinical skills
II. Training of Practicing Clinicians Initial practice Certification Process Maintenance of Certification Ongoing CME
III. Role of EMR
ONGOING WORKHEALTHCARE PROVIDERS
CDC Office of Public Health Genomics & National
Cancer Education & Early Detection Program 2003 – Michigan & Oregon pilot programs 2011 – Michigan, Oregon & Georgia programs
Focus: Education (patient & provider), surveillance and policy
Body Talk Decision support tool – aimed at providers &
patients
ONGOING WORKHEALTHCARE PROVIDERS
NIH eDoctoring Program (Dr. Michael Wilkes) Interactive online educational tool Topics – ethics, genetics, clinical
management, epidemiology, communication skills
Potential users – students (medical & nursing), residents, primary care providers
Potential use by credentialing bodies for certification and licensure (ex., California – palliative care and end of life)
ONGOING WORKHEALTHCARE PROVIDERS
Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality Resources (AHRQ)
Effective Healthcare Program – Create educational material for patients & healthcare providers.
The ACTION Network (Accelerating Change and Transformation in Organizations and Networks) Test and disseminate defined strategies.
SUMMARY
Guidelines have been developed to guide healthcare providers on issues related to genetic testing, risk assessment and chemoprevention strategies for young women at risk for breast cancer.
Significant gaps exist and additional research is needed to assess current level of knowledge of primary care providers and to fill in the gaps left by the above referenced studies.
Information thus learned could then be used to develop
focused strategies to target healthcare providers.
SUGGESTIONS TO COMMITTEE
1. Conduct assessment of current level of knowledge and practice of primary care providers around topic of breast cancer in young women
• Work with primary care societies (Medical and Nursing) to develop and disseminate survey instrument.
• Use eDoctoring tool to assess both knowledge and practice and impact of education.
• Assess use of tools available to CDC DocStyles Ongoing genomics initiatives
SUGGESTIONS TO COMMITTEE
2. Foster development of educational tools targeted to education of healthcare providers at various points of training:
• Assess potential use of certification and recertification requirements.
• Assess and expand tools such as eDoctoring to both study the needs of providers and to meet those needs.
SUGGESTIONS TO COMMITTEE
3. Continued study of Body Talk as a tool focused on both patients and healthcare providers:
• Potential use of AHRQ Action Network to study its effectiveness in both target groups.
• Search for effective dissemination strategies – potential use of AHRQ Effective Healthcare Program.