8/14/2019 Vulgarity by Santosh Desai

1/2

">

Publication: The Times Of India - Chennai; Date:2009 Feb 16; Section:Times City;

Page Number 5

CITY CITY BANG BANG

The death of vulgaritySantosh Desai

Is anything vulgar anymore? This word, once used to describe a whole host of actions,from ostentatious displays to salacious representations, is seldom used nowadays, except by

those who use it as a moral stick to beat others into submission. The idea of vulgarity has

been appropriated as an epithet to be used by groups with extreme views on how others

should behave.I grew up in a time that was mortally afraid of anything that remotely reeked of vulgarity.

The word itself was an ugly reminder of the import it carried, with the indecorous bulge ofconsonants that stumbled out of its trousers. To pronounce something vulgar was to banishit from the ranks of the civilised, by deeming things to be inappropriate rather than illicit.

The idea enabled a society like ours to mark its boundaries as well as to defend its implicit

belief system.We have come a long way since that time. Watching the IPL auctions and the media

interviews thereafter, I was struck by the absence of that word from our active vocabulary

today. Here we had a spectacle where the richest and the most glamourous body shoppedthe purest and the most talented by bidding on them. The sums of money were staggering,

the owners pride at having filled their stables with thoroughbreds was obvious and themedia attention that preyed on this event, fawning.

Afterwards there was a television interview, with the owners all resplendent in designerglasses talking about their acquisitions. In the entire interaction, there wasnt a trace of

selfconsciousness about what was happening. After all, they were rich and beautiful and

they had already bought Ferraris so why not sport stars now? Teams are bought and soldeverywhere but what we are revelling in now is the spectacle of acquisitions. The market in

India is not content to be an invisible mechanism but wants to strut around dressed in

gaudy finery. Wealth becomes real only when displayed. Money seems to create a vicariousthrall as we tingle in electric empathy when we hear tales of the Ambani or Mallya billions.

As we are with the kind of displays we see on television on a nightly basis. Unseemlysquabbles between bit-has-beens and obscure never-will-bes, comedy routines based on

crossdressing jokes full of bawdy suggestiveness, high-pitched melodramatic theatrics byreality show judges who are forever moving between tantrums, exploitative headlines in the

name of investigative reporting on news channels, up-the-skirt camera angles used to covera new sporting phenomenon called the cheerleader, the list is a long, long one. The kind of

people who dominate our screens are obvious attention-seeking mediocrities, but we allowthem to manipulate us into following their actions. Be it a singer called Mika, a dancer called

Sambhavana, a troubled politicians son called Rahul, we are rivetted by their inconsequencethat is put on such vivid display.

In a larger sense, the tendency to fragment the world into hierarchical sectors, each withdifferent social valencies, has given way to a more uniform social field governed by the

common currency of money. The legitimacy of money and its ability to speak in a uniform

voice, has blunted the sharp differences that existed earlier. The security once derived fromones social class which made money secondary is no longer as much in evidence. The club,

with its focus on exclusivity based on where you came from, has given way to the 5-star

hotel with its focus on how much you can pay.Television as a medium too hastens the move to privilege the quantitative over the

qualitative. The TRP, which is a superficial measure of viewership, determines televisioncontent today; it is more important how many people watch rather than what kind of

Page 1 of 2The death of vulgarity

17/02/2009http://epaper.timesofindia.com/APD26302/PrintArt.asp?SkinFolder=TOICH&banner...

8/14/2019 Vulgarity by Santosh Desai

2/2

influence a channel is able to exert. Today, an India TV gets the advertising support its TRPs

warrant, regardless of the content, whereas earlier, no matter how much a ManoharKahaniyan sold, it could never hope to get advertising support from certain kind of brands.

At one level, we are seeing a welcome democratisation taking place. Old hierarchies are

collapsing and mobility is a more transparent affair and is accessible to many more. Barriersof birth are being replaced by those of money and achievement. On the other hand, we

seem to have actively abandoned the desire to qualitatively discriminate between things and

are content to accept what is thrown our way uncritically.Of course, in a world full of diverse people, there can be no uniform standard of goodtaste. One persons aspiration can so easily be another persons vulgarity. The question is

whether the idea of using any standard is being applied at all. By not actively discriminating

between things, by being open to everything that the world throws at us in a passive way,do we help create a world where we will be ruled by people with the loudest voices, fattest

wallets and biggest sticks?

santoshdesai1963@indiatimes.com

Page 2 of 2The death of vulgarity

17/02/2009http://epaper.timesofindia.com/APD26302/PrintArt.asp?SkinFolder=TOICH&banner...