volume 1Cultivation Practices and Potato Cultivars Suitable for Organic Potato Production

download volume 1Cultivation Practices and Potato Cultivars Suitable for Organic Potato Production

of 12

Transcript of volume 1Cultivation Practices and Potato Cultivars Suitable for Organic Potato Production

  • 8/18/2019 volume 1Cultivation Practices and Potato Cultivars Suitable for Organic Potato Production

    1/12

    Cultivation Practices and Potato Cultivars

    Suitable for Organic Potato Production

    Jannie Elisabeth Hagman   & Anna Mårtensson   &

    Ulf Grandin

    Received: 18 November 2008 /Accepted: 14 May 2009

    # EAPR 2009

    Abstract  To identify the most important agronomic measures and cultivar traits in

    Swedish organic potato production, multivariate analyses were performed on a set of 

    data from a series of field trials carried out in Sweden during a 7-year period. The

    effects of soil parameters, cultivar, year and geographical location on potato

    characteristics were investigated. Soil parameters including fertility level had strong

    and significant effects on potato characteristics, explaining 53% of total variation.

    Variables related to the duration of haulm growth were other dominant factors in the

    variation. While P and K fertilization increased yields, N fertilization had little effect 

    on yield and a negative effect on the time to emergence. The N requirement of 

     potatoes ranges from 2.5 to 5.9 kg ha−1  per ton of tuber yield and was met in these

    trials. The results implied the timing of N application is important for yield. It was

    concluded that the importance of P and K fertilization is underestimated in organic

     production, and that the most important cultivar trait in achieving acceptable yield is

    long-lasting foliage, which is a characteristic of cultivars resistant to   Phytophthora

    infestans. Three of the cultivars tested (Lady Balfour, Cicero and Sarpo Mira) had a

    yield >3.5 kg m−2, which is high in Swedish organic production.

    Potato Research

    DOI 10.1007/s11540-009-9128-3

    J. E. Hagman (*)

    Department of Crop Production Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences,

    Uppsala, Sweden

    e-mail: [email protected]

    A. Mårtensson

    Department of Soil and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden

    U. Grandin

    Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences,

    Uppsala, Sweden

  • 8/18/2019 volume 1Cultivation Practices and Potato Cultivars Suitable for Organic Potato Production

    2/12

    Keywords   Cultivar . Fertilization . Organic production . Phytophthora infestans .

    Potato . Yield loss

    Introduction

    In Sweden and several other countries in western Europe, government policy

    initiatives and consumer demand have resulted in an increase in organic farming

    during recent years (Hansen et al.   2001; Lynch et al.   2008; Eurostat   2009). The

     proportion of organically certified agricultural production in Sweden has steadily

    increased in recent decades, but organic potato production has not increased. Instead,

    the acreage of organic potato production decreased by 30% during the period 2001 – 

    2006, and is now 2.5% of the total potato acreage (SCB   2002,   2007; SJV   2002).

    Potato (Solanum tuberosum  L.) is an important staple food in Sweden and is deeplyrooted in Swedish cultural traditions since it can be produced in most parts of the

    country. The decrease in organic potato production in Sweden can most likely be

    explained by several constraints, for example the higher production costs for organic

     potatoes and the lower yields compared with those of conventionally produced

     potatoes. In addition, organic production can be unpredictable owing to environ-

    mental factors (e.g., climate and disease pressure), which can give large fluctuations

    in quantity and quality. Losses due to insect and pest damage and overall poor 

    quality can be high (Hansen et al.  2001; Lynch et al.  2008; Maggio et al.  2008).

    A particular threat in potato production is the serious late blight disease caused by theoomycete Phytophthora infestans. The disease affects both foliage and tubers and can

    destroy an entire field within a few days. In conventional production, the disease is

    controlled by fungicides and the crop is sprayed several times during the growing

    season. There are no efficient agents to control late blight in organic potato production,

    the only methods available being to rely on resistant cultivars and/or cropping measures

    such as the use of early maturing cultivars and presprouting to advance maturity so

    the crop is ready early in the season before late blight has had a chance to strike

    (Karalus and Rauber  1997; Larsson and Hagman 2007; Möller and Reents  2007).

    Conventional potato production is linked to heavy use of pesticides and nutrient 

    leaching, prompting the Swedish Board of Agriculture to fund a series of organic

     potato trials to stimulate organic production.

    The objective of this paper was to identify the agronomic measures and cultivar 

    traits important in achieving a good organic potato crop. The study is based on a

    series of field trials carried out in Sweden over several years to screen different 

     potato cultivars for their suitability for organic production and to provide farmers

    and advisers with more information about the different cultivars. Many quality traits

    must be present to make a successful table potato. Important properties are consumer 

    acceptance, yield, storability and resistance to diseases such as late blight. Cultivars

    entering this series of field trials were selected (in descending order of importance)

    for high resistance to potato late blight, earliness (in combination with resistance to

    late blight) and cooking quality. The resulting multidimensional dataset was

    analysed using multivariate techniques that can be used to accurately identify both

    sensory and quality traits in relation to cultivar and cultivation conditions

    (Arvanitoyannis et al.  2008).

    Potato Research

  • 8/18/2019 volume 1Cultivation Practices and Potato Cultivars Suitable for Organic Potato Production

    3/12

    Materials and Methods

    Trial Set-up

    The trials were conducted at five sites (A – E) (Table 1) spread over Sweden from thesouth (56.02°, 14.06°) to the north (63.81°, 20.24°). In total, 21 trials were

    conducted during a 7-year period (2001 – 2007). Sites A and B were situated in potato

     production areas with many surrounding potato fields, while the other three sites

    were situated in areas with less intensive potato production. During individual years,

    the same potato cultivars were included in all experiments, but different cultivars

    were tested in different years. Each cultivar was generally tested for 3 years. In total,

    17 cultivars were tested during the period (Table  2). The number of trials and trial

    sites in operation varied between two and five per year. The seed potatoes for the

    trials were produced annually under organic management (SJV   2007) at a siteoutside Uppsala (59.80°, 17.68°) to avoid carryover effects on the seed, for example

    differences in physiological age.

    The trials were managed according to common practices in organic potato

     production. Soil content of N, P and K was analysed before fertilization. However,

    data on soil N were obtained for only 93 of the 106 plots included in this study. The

    fertilizer applied was farm manure or biological residues permissible in organic

    farming. Total N, P, K and mineral N (NH4+, NO3

    −) content of these organic

    fertilizers was determined before application. The manure was applied in the spring a

    couple of weeks prior to planting in amounts aiming at 90-100 kg NO3−

    -N ha

    −1

    in thesouth of Sweden and 70 kg NO3−-N ha−1 in the north.

    The levels of P and K varied according to which manure was used. For P the

    levels were around 40 kg ha−1 in southern Sweden and 15 kg ha−1 in the north, while

    the corresponding amounts for K were 110 kg ha−1 in southern Sweden and 50 kg

    ha−1 in northern Sweden.

    The seed potatoes were presprouted and planted with a semiautomatic potato

     planter (Underhaug). Weeds were mechanically controlled by harrowing and hoeing.

    Emergence and flowering of the different cultivars were assessed. The plots were not 

    treated against potato late blight. Tubers were harvested following standard farming

     practices in the area. When necessary, haulms were killed by crushing them 2 weeks

     before harvest. Plots were harvested with a potato lifter (Juko Midi, model 2000).

    Table 1   Geographical coordinates and years for sites included in the statistical analyses

    Trial sites Coordinates Trial year  

    2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

    A 56.02°, 14.06° X X X X X X X

    B 56.64°, 12.95° X X

    C 57.13°, 18.23° X X

    D 60.29°, 15.98° X X X X X X

    E 63.81°, 20.24° X

    Potato Research

  • 8/18/2019 volume 1Cultivation Practices and Potato Cultivars Suitable for Organic Potato Production

    4/12

    The field trials were laid out as a randomized complete block design with four 

    replicates and with six to eight cultivars in each trial. The plot size was 16 – 18 m2, with

    some variation at the different trial sites. Parameters assessed in the field were time to

    emergence (50% of plants emerged), days to flowering and number of stems per plant.

    The physiopathological conditions in plots were assessed once a week from the first 

    appearance of late blight in the area. Each plot was assessed for late blight and non-

    specific necrosis according to the scale developed by Anonymous (1947). After 

    harvest, tuber yield and size distribution were assessed for each plot. Harvested tubers

    Table 2   Cultivars included in the field trials during the period 2001-2007 and in the statistical analyses

    Cultivar Abbreviation Maturitya  Country of 

    origina Year 

    2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

    Appell App Intermediate b Sweden X X

    Asterix Ast Intermediate to

    late

     Netherlands X X

    Cicero Cice Early to

    intermediate

     Netherlands X X X

    Ditta Ditta Early to

    intermediate

    Austria X X X X X

    Escort Esc Early Netherlands X X X

    Eve

    Balfour 

    Eve Intermediate UK X

    Fresco Fres Very early to

    early

     Netherlands X X X X

    Lady

    Balfour 

    Lady Very late UK  

    Matilda Mati Intermediate to

    late

    Sweden X X X X X X X

    Ovatio Ovat Intermediate to

    late

     Netherlands X X

    Princess Princ Very early to

    early

     Netherlands X X

    Raja Raja Intermediate Netherlands X X X X X

    Sarpo

    Mira

    Sarpo Very late Hungary X

    Satina Sati Early to

    intermediatecGermany X X X X

    Superb Sup Intermediate b Sweden X X X

    Symfonia Symf Intermediate Netherlands X X

    Ukama Ukam Very early to

    early

     Netherlands X X

    Verity Verity Intermediate UK X X X

    a According to the European Cultivated Potato Database (http://www.europotato.org) when nothing else is

    noted b Communication with breeder (SW seed)c Beschreibende Sortenliste Kartoffel 2003 (Bundessortenamt, Hannover, Germany)

    Potato Research

    http://www.europotato.org/http://www.europotato.org/

  • 8/18/2019 volume 1Cultivation Practices and Potato Cultivars Suitable for Organic Potato Production

    5/12

    were sorted into five size fractions: 65-mm tuber diameter.

    Each year, raw data from the individual field trials were compiled using the MIXED

     procedure of SAS software (SAS Institute 1996), resulting in one accurate mean value

     per variable and field trial for use in further calculations. Dry matter concentration was

    determined in a sample of 200 g of graded tubers of 45 – 55-mm size. Cooking qualitywas assessed by cooking 25 peeled tubers. When cooked, the tubers were cut in half 

    and, after cooling, the incidence of sogginess, darkening and disintegration was

    assessed by visual ratings according to the following norms of the Swedish Table

    Potato Control Agency: sogginess was assessed by exerting pressure with the thumb

    on the tubers and dividing soft tubers into the classes weak or strong sogginess; the

    actual numbers of tubers showing darkening were recorded; and disintegration was

    assessed as either weak disintegration with cracks in the outer parts of the tuber, or 

    strong disintegration with tubers falling apart. The incidence of weakly/strongly soggy,

    darkened and weakly/strongly disintegrated tubers was then expressed as a percentageof the total. The incidence of late blight and other internal and external diseases was

    determined in a sample of 50 tubers. This was first done by visual inspection of the

    surface of the tubers and then tubers were sliced and the interior examined for 

    incidence of  Phytophthora infestans in the tubers. These tests were performed for each

    cultivar at every trial site.

    Statistical Analyses

    Multivariate methods were used to assess the effect of soil variables, cultivar, year of trial (2001 – 2007) and geographical coordinates ( x   and   y   in the Swedish national

    grid) on various potato characteristics. These potato characteristics were days from

     planting to emergence, days from emergence to 2% necrosis, days from emergence

    to 50% necrosis, days from emergence to haulm killing, total yield, yield of tuber 

    fraction

  • 8/18/2019 volume 1Cultivation Practices and Potato Cultivars Suitable for Organic Potato Production

    6/12

    The relationships between individual soil variables and potato characteristics were

    assessed by principal component analysis (PCA) and RDA using the program

    CANOCO version 4.5 (ter Braak and  Šmilauer  2002). To avoid collinearity, Soil_Lo,

    Soil_Si and CerW had to be deleted prior to the analysis owing to indications of 

    high-variance inflation factors in preliminary runs. The significance of eachremaining soil variable was tested using forward Monte Carlo testing ( P 

  • 8/18/2019 volume 1Cultivation Practices and Potato Cultivars Suitable for Organic Potato Production

    7/12

    was therefore excluded from the variance partitioning in Fig.   2   to reduce thecomplexity of the illustration. The fraction of variation that could not be explained

     by these four sets of explanatory variables was 26%. The relatively low contribution

    from year shows that the results differed between the years included in the study, but 

    that this contribution to the total variation was close to negligible compared with the

    variation caused by soil variables.

    As the variance partitioning showed that soil variables were the dominant source

    of variation, the importance of individual soil variables alone on potato character-

    istics was assessed in a RDA ordination, (i.e. not including year and cultivar in the

    analyses) (Fig.   3). The Monte Carlo permutation test showed that sandy soil and

    earlier growth of spring cereals had non-significant relationships with the potato

    characteristics examined here and they were therefore removed from the explanatory

    dataset. The final results showed that variables related to duration of haulm growth

    were the dominant factors for variation in the dataset, as indicated by their high

    correlation to axis 1 (Fig.   3). The main explanatory factor related to duration of 

    haulm growth was ambient soil P. Yield was also relatively highly related to axis 1,

     but in addition was affected by P and K fertilization to a much higher degree than

    haulm growth. Phosphorus fertilization and K fertilization were also positively

    correlated with  Phytophthora infestans   incidence in tubers. The ordination indicated

    a very weak relationship between ambient soil P and P fertilization, and a weak 

    correlation between ambient soil K and K fertilization. These results were confirmed

    in independent tests of the correlation between these two pairs of variables (P,   r =

    −0.17; K,   r =−0.30;   P >0.05 for both). Thus, irrespective of ambient soil levels, P

    fertilization and K fertilization were the most important variables for yield. In

    contrast, N fertilization had little effect on yield and had a negative effect on

    Fig. 2   Variance components explaining the variation in potato characteristics. Circles represent explained

    variation and the area outside the circles represents unexplained variation. Values show the variation

    explained by each circle section or intercept individually. Values less than zero are not shown

    Potato Research

  • 8/18/2019 volume 1Cultivation Practices and Potato Cultivars Suitable for Organic Potato Production

    8/12

    emergence, i.e. additional N fertilizer delayed emergence. The negative effect of N

    was also indicated by the peripheral position of peas as the preceding crop in the

    ordination diagram. A univariate correlation test between yield and N fertilizer ( r =

    −0.04,  P >0.6) reconfirmed that these two variables were uncorrelated in this study.

    As the results of the multivariate analyses showed that yield and N fertilization had a

    weak relationship, we tested whether this pattern was an effect of different levels of 

    fertilization of different cultivars. However, there were no significant differences in

    the amount of N applied to different cultivars (analysis of variance,  F 19.94=0.6, P >

    0.9). We also tested the effect of ambient soil N on yield, using a subset of the data

    for plots where data on soil N were available (n=93). The results showed that soil N

    was also uncorrelated to yield (r =−0.01).

    Eight cultivars (Fresco, Symfonia, Appell, Ditta, Matilda, Asterix, Satina and

    Ukama, in decreasing order) were negatively related to yield, while the other cultivars

    were more or less positively related to the yield vector in the RDA (Fig.  3). This is

    illustrated by the perpendicular projection of the cultivars onto the yield vector and its

    elongation to the right of the origin in the ordination diagram. The same eight 

    cultivars, with the addition of Ovatio, also showed the strongest negative relationships

    to the persistence of foliage. In our experiment, all three variables expressing time to

    decay of foliage were positively related to yield, i.e. the longer the period before the

    foliage started to decay, the higher the tuber yield. It is known that foliage decay in

    organic potato production is mainly caused by late blight. This suggests that cultivars

    with a high resistance to late blight have the greatest potential for high yield.

    Fig. 3   Redundancy analysis ( RDA) showing potato characteristics (lower case) and significant soil

    variables (title case) as vectors for continuous variables and points for binary variables. Cultivar (italics) is

    added as a passive variable for help in visual interpretation of the diagram (abbreviations in Table   2).

    Isolines indicate the value of the variable   ‘yield’ (kg m−2) in the ordination space. Axis 1 explains 20% of 

    the variation and axis 2 explains 7.6%

    Potato Research

  • 8/18/2019 volume 1Cultivation Practices and Potato Cultivars Suitable for Organic Potato Production

    9/12

    Discussion

    Our main objective was to identify important cultivation factors and cultivars

    suitable for organic production. In this respect,   ‘suitable’   was defined as a cultivar 

    giving a reliable crop, acceptable yield and tubers with good cooking qualities.One of the most important results from the RDA of the data was that neither N

    fertilization nor soil N was significantly related to yield. This contradicts the results

    from many other studies. It is frequently reported that N has great importance for 

     potato tuber yield (van Delden  2001; van Delden et al.   2003; Roinila et al.   2003;

    Möller et al. 2007). The N requirement of potatoes ranges from 2.5 to 5.9 kg N ha−1

    for each ton of tuber yield (Munoz et al.   2005) and this was met in the trials

    described in this paper. Haulm development is said to be strongly affected by N

    supply/availability in the first weeks after emergence  (Millard and MacKerron 1986;

    Harris 1992; Vos 1995). Increased N supply is reported to give a faster full canopyand longer leaf area duration, and thus increased yields (Millard and MacKerron

    1986; Grindlay   1997). It has also been reported that N is the main factor limiting

    yield in organic potato cultivation (Vos 1995; Finckh et al.  2006; Haase et al.  2007;

    Möller et al.   2007). In addition, many factors have synergistic interactions, for 

    example irrigation, N fertilization and farming system (Maggio et al.  2008). Findings

    that support our results are that N-use efficiency appears to be higher in low-input 

    systems (Finckh et al.  2006) and that the potato crop responds to limited N levels by

    maximizing light-use efficiency (van Delden   2001). An important aspect is that N

    availability is difficult to predict if the N is applied in organically bound form, as isthe case in organic cultivation systems (Varis et al.  1996; Gastal and Lemaire 2002;

    van Delden et al.   2003), and the timing of N release is crucial for good results.

    Increased N availability in conjunction with tuberization can extend the vegetative

    growth period and delay tuber development, both of which lead to decreased yield

    (Burton 1966; Alva 2004; Love et al. 2005). The long-term effects of manure in the

    whole crop rotation may have a greater influence on potato quality than the short-

    term effects, owing to the slow release of nutrients and the beneficial effects of 

    manure on soil biological activity (Roinila et al.   2003). The results of the present 

    study show how difficult it is to synchronize crop demand with N availability. In

    Sweden, the vegetation period is short and therefore delayed tuberization can have a

    negative effect on yield. Nitrogen fertilizer levels are generally low in both organic

    and conventional farming in Sweden compared with further south in Europe. In the

    field trials described in this study, fertilizer was applied in spring, a couple of weeks

     before planting. This could have resulted in high soil mineralization of the N applied

    and in turn increased plant-available N to a level where N was no longer the main

    yield-limiting factor. From the results, it can be concluded that N was not a yield-

    limiting factor.

    Potassium nutrition can be a constraint in organic potato production as there are

    few organic fertilizers rich in K (Finckh et al.  2006). The strong correlation between

    yield and K and P fertilization in this study (Fig.   3) indicates that these nutrients

    were the most restricted and potentially yield limiting.

    Duration of haulm growth, measured as the number of days from emergence to 2,

    50 and 100% necrosis or haulm killing, was the dominant factor explaining variance

    in the dataset, and time to foliage decay showed a positive correlation with yield.

    Potato Research

  • 8/18/2019 volume 1Cultivation Practices and Potato Cultivars Suitable for Organic Potato Production

    10/12

    Haulm degradation was related to outbreaks of late blight, but could also be

    attributed to other diseases or stage of maturity. According to Finckh et al. ( 2006)

    and Speiser et al. (2006), the selection of cultivars with a high resistance to late

     blight ( Phytophthora infestans) is an important strategy in organic potato production.

    It was also one of the characteristics for which cultivars were chosen in the present study. Our RDA showed a long period before foliage decay to be associated with

    high yield. This suggests that resistance to  Phytophthora infestans   is an important 

    trait in cultivars suitable for organic production.

    The RDA also indicated a relationship between yield and number of days

     between planting and emergence. A long period between planting and emergence

    was associated with low yield, which agrees with findings that presprouting of 

    seed tubers has a positive impact on tuber maturation by accelerating crop

    development (Karalus and Rauber   1997; Möller and Reents   2007; Paffrath and

    Milz   2008). This suggests that measures that promote fast emergence, e.g., soil preparation or presprouting, have a beneficial effect on tuber yield. However the

    opposite can also occur, as presprouting can make the plants more susceptible to

     both   Phytophthora infestans   and   Alternaria solani   (Zarzynska and Goliszewski

    2007), which reflects the difficult decisions that have to be taken in organic potato

     production.

    Early maturing cultivars have early tuber bulking and hence a chance to

    achieve significant tuber yield before the crop is infected by   Phytophthora

    infestans, and therefore maturation type was another trait for which cultivars were

    selected in these trials. Unfortunately there is an interaction between maturation typeand susceptibility to late blight, with early maturing cultivars often being more

    susceptible (Toxopeus  1958; Ross   1986; Visker   2005; Razukas et al.   2008). This

    was observed in the present study, where early maturing cultivars were often the first 

    to develop late blight. However, the RDA could neither verify nor reject the

     possibility that early maturing cultivars could achieve acceptable yields by escaping

    late blight (Fig. 3). The highest yields were achieved by both late and early maturing

    cultivars.

    Cooking quality variables were of subordinate importance in the ordination

    diagram, primarily indicated by the short vectors for cooking quality variables

    (Fig.   3). If cooking quality had been a major variance component related to the

    explanatory variables in this dataset, these variables would reflect the inherent 

    cooking quality of different cultivars. However, this was not the case and instead

    variables related to growth dominated the ordination. The passively added cultivars

    showed, for example, that cv. Symfonia was one of several cultivars negatively

    associated with disintegration and darkening. Cv. Symfonia has inherently high

    levels of disintegration and darkening, but the ordination rather suggested the

    opposite. However, RDA is a constrained ordination, which means that the response

    variables (lower case in Fig.   3) are constrained by the variance structure in the

    explanatory variables to show the relationship between response and explanatory

    variables. In the unconstrained ordination on the same dataset (Fig.  1) the cooking

    quality variables were up-weighted, while the other variables largely remained as in

    the constrained ordination. Thus, cooking quality was an important variance

    component in the response dataset, but it is merely an inherent characteristic of the

    cultivars rather than an effect of nutrients.

    Potato Research

  • 8/18/2019 volume 1Cultivation Practices and Potato Cultivars Suitable for Organic Potato Production

    11/12

    On the basis of the results of this study, we conclude that the importance of P and

    K fertilization is underestimated in organic production in Sweden today and that the

    most important cultivar trait in achieving acceptable yield is a long period before

    onset of foliage decay, which is present in cultivars resistant to   Phytophthora

    infestans.  Three of the cultivars tested (Lady Balfour, Cicero and Sarpo Mira) had ayield of more than 3.5 kg m

    −2, while five cultivars (Eve Balfour, Escort, Superb,

    Ovatio and Princess) yielded more than 3 kg m−2, which is a high yield for organic

     potato production in Sweden. All of these cultivars except Princess have very good/ 

    good resistance to   Phytophthora infestans.   Among these cultivars, Cicero, Sarpo

    Mira, Superb, Ovatio and Princess are considered tasty and suitable as table

     potatoes.

    References

    Alva K (2004) Potato nitrogen management. J Veg Crop Prod 10(1):97 – 130

    Anonymous (1947) The measurement of potato blight. Trans Br Mycol Soc 31:140 – 141

    Arvanitoyannis IS, Vaitsi O, Mavromantis A (2008) Potato: A comparative study of the effect of cultivars

    and cultivation conditions and genetic modification on the physico-chemical properties of potato

    tubers in conjunction with multivariate analysis towards authenticity. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 48:799 – 

    823. doi:10.1080/10408390701691059

    Bocard D, Legendre P, Drapeau P (1992) Partialling out spatial component of ecological variation.

    Ecology 73:1045 – 1055. doi:10.2307/1940179

    Burton WG (1966) The potato. Veenman & Zonen, Wageningen

    Eurostat (2009) Site 3-TGM table.   http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1& plugin=0&language=en&pcode=tsdpc440. Accessed 20 Apr 2009

    Finckh MR, Schulte-Geldeman E, Bruns C (2006) Challenges to organic potato farming: disease and

    nutrient management. Potato Res 49:27 – 42. doi:10.1007/s11540-006-9004-3

    Gastal F, Lemaire G (2002) N uptake and distribution in crops: an agronomical and ecophysiological

     perspective. J Exp Bot 53(370):789 – 799. doi:10.1093/jexbot/53.370.789

    Grindlay DJC (1997) Towards an explanation of crop N demand based on the optimization of leaf area. J

    Agric Sci Camb 128:377 – 396. doi:10.1017/S0021859697004310

    Haase T, Schüler C, Haase NU, Heb J (2007) Suitability of organic potatoes for industrial processing:

    effect of agronomic measures on selected quality parameters at harvest and after storage. Potato Res

    50(2):115 – 141. doi:10.1007/s11540-007-9033-6

    Hansen B, Alroe HF, Kristensen ES (2001) Approaches to assess the environmental impact of organic

    farming with particular regard to Denmark. Agric Ecosyst Environ 83:11 – 26

    Harris PM (1992) The potato crop. Chapman & Hall, London

    Karalus W, Rauber R (1997) Effect on presprouting on yield and quality of maincrop potatoes (Solanum

    tuberosum L.) in organic farming. J Agron Crop Sci 179:241 – 249. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037X.1997.

    tb00523.x

    Larsson S, Hagman J (2007) Sortval i ekologiskodling. Aktuellt från VPE Nr. 3.  http://www2.vpe.slu.se/ 

    VPEaktuellt/AktuelltNR3.pdf . Accessed 20 Apr 2009

    Love SL, Stark JC, Salaiz T (2005) Response of four potato cultivars to rate and timing of nitrogen

    fertilizer. Am J Potato Res 82:21 – 30. doi:10.1007/BF02894916

    Lynch DH, Zheng ZM, Zebarth BJ et al (2008) Organic amendment effects on tuber yield, plant N

    uptake and soil mineral N under organic potato production. Renew Agric Food Syst 23(3):250 – 259

    Maggio A, Carillo P, Bulmetti GS, Fuggi A, Barbieri G, De Pascale S (2008) Potato yield and metabolic profiling under conventional and organic farming. Eur J Agron 28:343 – 350. doi:10.1016/j.

    eja.2007.10.003

    Millard P, MacKerron DKL (1986) The effects of nitrogen application on growth and nitrogen distribution

    within the potato canopy. Ann Appl Biol 109:427 – 437. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1986.tb05334.x

    Möller K, Reents HJ (2007) Impact of agronomic strategies (seed tuber pre-sprouting, cultivar choice) to

    control late blight   (Phytophthora infestans)   on tuber growth and yield in organic potato (Solanum

    tuberosum L.) crops. Potato Res 50:15 – 29. doi:10.1007/s11540-007-9026-5

    Potato Research

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408390701691059http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1940179http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&plugin=0&language=en&pcode=tsdpc440http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&plugin=0&language=en&pcode=tsdpc440http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11540-006-9004-3http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/53.370.789http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021859697004310http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11540-007-9033-6http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.1997.tb00523.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.1997.tb00523.xhttp://www2.vpe.slu.se/VPEaktuellt/AktuelltNR3.pdfhttp://www2.vpe.slu.se/VPEaktuellt/AktuelltNR3.pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02894916http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2007.10.003http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2007.10.003http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1986.tb05334.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11540-007-9026-5http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11540-007-9026-5http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1986.tb05334.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2007.10.003http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2007.10.003http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02894916http://www2.vpe.slu.se/VPEaktuellt/AktuelltNR3.pdfhttp://www2.vpe.slu.se/VPEaktuellt/AktuelltNR3.pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.1997.tb00523.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.1997.tb00523.xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11540-007-9033-6http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021859697004310http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/53.370.789http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11540-006-9004-3http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&plugin=0&language=en&pcode=tsdpc440http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&plugin=0&language=en&pcode=tsdpc440http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1940179http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408390701691059

  • 8/18/2019 volume 1Cultivation Practices and Potato Cultivars Suitable for Organic Potato Production

    12/12

    Möller K, Habermeyer J, Zinkernagel V, Reents HJ (2007) Impact and interactions of nitrogen and

     Phytophthora infestans   as yield-limiting and yield-reducing factors in organic potato (Solanum

    tuberosum L.) crops. Potato Res 49:281 – 301. doi:10.1007/s11540-007-9024-7

    Munoz F, Mylavarapu RS, Hutchinson CM (2005) Environmentally responsible potato production

    systems: a review. J Plant Nutr 28:1287 – 1309. doi:10.1081/PLN-200067434

    Oksanen J, Kindt R, Legendre P, O'Hara B, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Henry M, Stevens H, Wagner H(2008) vegan: community ecology package. R package version 1.8 – 8. Available via  http://vegan.r-

    forge.r-project.org/ . Accessed 4 Apr 2009

    Paffrath A, Milz E (2008) Effect of presprouting, organic nitrogen-fertilization and copper treatment on

    yield and quality of potato in organic production. Gesunde Pflanz 60:1 – 4. doi:10.1007/s10343-008-

    0172-8

    Razukas A, Jundulas J, Asakaviciute R (2008) Potato cultivars susceptible to potato late blight 

    ( Phytophthora infestans). Appl Ecol Environ Res 6(1):95 – 106

    R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation

    for Statistical Computing, Vienna.  http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 5 May 2009

    Roinila P, Väisänen J, Granstedt A, Kunttu S (2003) Effects of different organic fertilization practices and

    mineral fertilization on potato quality. Biol Agric Hortic 21:165 – 194

    Ross H (1986) Late blight,   Phytophthora infestans   (Mont.) de Bary. In: Ross H (ed) Advances in plant  breeding, vol 13. Potato breeding: problems and perspectives. Perey, Berlin, pp 82 – 86

    SAS Institute (1996) SAS system for mixed models. SAS Institute, Cary

    SCB (2002) Potatis, konsumtion och fritidsodling. Report. Statistics Sweden, Stockholm

    SCB (2007) Year book of agricultural statistics. Statistics Sweden, Stockholm

    SJV (2002) Förslag till handlingsplan för användning av bekämpningsmedel i jordbruket. Rapport 2002:7.

    Swedish Board of Agriculture, Jönköping

    SJV (2007) Council Regulation (EC) for organic production. Swedish Board of Agriculture,   http://www.

    sjv.se/amnesomraden/vaxtmiljovatten/ekologiskproduktion/reglerochkontroll.4.14586571043

    c6e11ac80001105.html. Accessed 20 Apr 2009

    Speiser B, Tamm L, Amsler T, Lambion J, Bertrand C, Hermansen A, Ruissen MA, Haaland P, Zarb J,

    Santos J, Shotton P, Wilcockson S, Juntharathep P, Ghorbani R, Leifert C (2006) Improvement of late blight management in organic potato production systems in Europe: Field tests with more resistant 

    varieties and copper-based fungicides. Biol Agric Hortic 23:393 – 412

    ter Braak CJF,  Šmilauer P (2002) CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user ’s guide:

    software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca,

    Toxopeus HJ (1958) Some notes on the relations between field resistance to   Phytophthora infestans   in

    leaves and tubers and ripening time in  Solanum tuberosum  subsp.   tuberosum. Euphytica 7:123 – 130.

    doi:10.1007/BF00035725

    van Delden A (2001) Yield and growth components of potato and wheat under organic nitrogen

    management. Agron J 93:1370 – 1385

    van Delden A, Schröder JJ, Kropff MJ, Grashoff C, Booij R (2003) Simulated potato yield, and crop and

    soil nitrogen dynamics under different organic nitrogen management strategies in the Netherlands.

    Agric Ecosyst Environ 96:77 – 95Varis E, Pietilä L, Koikkalainen K (1996) Comparison of conventional, integrated and organic potato

     production in field experiments in Finland. Acta Agric Scand Sect B Soil Plant Sci 46:41 – 48

    Visker M (2005) Association between late blight resistance and foliage maturity type in potato. PhD

    thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen

    Vos J (1995) The effects of nitrogen supply and stem density on leaf attributes and branching in potato

    (Solanum tuberosum  L.). Potato Res 38:271 – 279. doi:10.1007/BF02359909

    Zarzynska K, Goliszewski W (2007) Influence of seed tubers preparation on plants development and yield

    of potatoes growing in organic production system on different types of soil. J Res Appl Agric Eng 52

    (4):104 – 107

    Potato Research

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11540-007-9024-7http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/PLN-200067434http://vegan.r-forge.r-project.org/http://vegan.r-forge.r-project.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10343-008-0172-8http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10343-008-0172-8http://www.r-project.org/http://www.sjv.se/amnesomraden/vaxtmiljovatten/ekologiskproduktion/reglerochkontroll.4.14586571043c6e11ac80001105.htmlhttp://www.sjv.se/amnesomraden/vaxtmiljovatten/ekologiskproduktion/reglerochkontroll.4.14586571043c6e11ac80001105.htmlhttp://www.sjv.se/amnesomraden/vaxtmiljovatten/ekologiskproduktion/reglerochkontroll.4.14586571043c6e11ac80001105.htmlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00035725http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02359909http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02359909http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00035725http://www.sjv.se/amnesomraden/vaxtmiljovatten/ekologiskproduktion/reglerochkontroll.4.14586571043c6e11ac80001105.htmlhttp://www.sjv.se/amnesomraden/vaxtmiljovatten/ekologiskproduktion/reglerochkontroll.4.14586571043c6e11ac80001105.htmlhttp://www.sjv.se/amnesomraden/vaxtmiljovatten/ekologiskproduktion/reglerochkontroll.4.14586571043c6e11ac80001105.htmlhttp://www.r-project.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10343-008-0172-8http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10343-008-0172-8http://vegan.r-forge.r-project.org/http://vegan.r-forge.r-project.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/PLN-200067434http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11540-007-9024-7