Volatilisation of metals and metalloids: An inherent feature of methanoarchaea?
-
Upload
joerg-meyer -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Volatilisation of metals and metalloids: An inherent feature of methanoarchaea?
![Page 1: Volatilisation of metals and metalloids: An inherent feature of methanoarchaea?](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020406/5750746c1a28abdd2e946b2c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
ARTICLE IN PRESS
0723-2020/$ - se
doi:10.1016/j.sy
�Correspondfax: +49201 18
E-mail addr
Systematic and Applied Microbiology 31 (2008) 81–87
www.elsevier.de/syapm
Volatilisation of metals and metalloids: An inherent feature
of methanoarchaea?
Jorg Meyer, Klaus Michalke, Theresa Kouril, Reinhard Hensel�
Department of Microbiology I, University of Duisburg-Essen, Universitaetsstr. 5, D-45117 Essen, Germany
Received 25 September 2007
Abstract
As shown by recent studies, anaerobic members of Archaea and Bacteria are involved in processes that transformionic species of metals and metalloids (arsenic, antimony, bismuth, selenium, tellurium and mercury) into volatile andmostly toxic derivatives (mainly methyl derivatives or hydrides). Since the fact that these transformations proceed inboth environmental settings and in parts of the human body, we have to consider that these processes also interferedirectly with human health. The diversity of the volatile derivatives produced and their emission rates weresignificantly higher in methanoarchaeal than in bacterial strains, which supports the pivotal role of methanoarchaea intransforming metals and metalloids (metal(loid)s) into their volatile derivatives. Compared with methanoarchaea, 14anaerobic bacterial strains showed a significantly restricted spectrum of volatilised derivatives and mostly lowerproduction rates of volatile bismuth and selenium derivatives. Since methanoarchaea isolated from the human gut(Methanosphaera stadtmanae, Methanobrevibacter smithii) showed a higher potential for metal(loid) derivatisationcompared to bacterial gut isolates, we assume that methanoarchaea in the human gut are mainly responsible for theproduction of these volatile derivatives. The observation that trimethylbismuth ((CH3)3Bi), the main volatile derivativeof bismuth produced in human feces, inhibited growing cultures of Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, a representativemember of the human physiological gut flora, suggests that these volatiles exert their toxic effects on human health notonly by direct interaction with host cells but also by disturbing the physiological gut microflora.r 2008 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Biomethylation; Gut microbiota; Methanoarchaea; Volatile metal and metalloid derivatives
Introduction
As shown by a series of studies [2,4,10,18–22,29],elements such as arsenic, antimony, bismuth, selenium,tellurium, lead, tin and mercury can be transformed bymethylation and hydridisation into volatile derivatives.The first research into the biosynthesis of these
e front matter r 2008 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
apm.2008.02.001
ing author. Tel.: +49201 183 3442;
3 3990.
ess: [email protected] (R. Hensel).
derivatives was performed by Gosio [11], who demon-strated that several Ascomycetes were able to transformspecies of arsenic into a volatile compound, which wassubsequently identified as trimethylarsenic. Generally,such biotransformations seem to be preferred underanaerobic conditions, with members of the metha-noarchaea playing a dominant role [7,8,17,19].
Since most of these volatile products are more toxicthan their inorganic educts [5,12,15,30], these processesdeserve closer public attention, particularly as some ofthese organisms are part of the microbiota from several
![Page 2: Volatilisation of metals and metalloids: An inherent feature of methanoarchaea?](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020406/5750746c1a28abdd2e946b2c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Table
1.
Volatile
metal(loid)derivatives
producedbyvariousmethanoarchaea
andbacteria
Strains
Volatile
metal(loid)derivatives
oftheelem
ents
Sources
References
Arsenic
Selenium
Tellurium
Antimony
Bismuth
Methanoarchaea
Met
han
osp
ha
era
sta
dtm
an
aea
DSM
3091T
(CH
3) 2AsH
,(C
H3) 3As
(CH
3) 2Se,
(CH
3) 2SeS,
(CH
3) 2Se 2,SeX
b(C
H3) 2Te
(CH
3) 3Sb
CH
3BiH
2,(C
H3) 2BiH
,
(CH
3) 3Bi
Humanfeces
Michalkeet
al.,
2007
Met
hanobre
vibact
er
smit
hiiaDSM
2374
CH
3AsH
2,(C
H3) 2AsH
,
(CH
3) 3As
(CH
3) 2Se,
(CH
3) 2SeS,
(CH
3) 2Se 2
,SeX
b(C
H3) 2Te
(CH
3) 3Sb
CH
3BiH
2,(C
H3) 2BiH
,
(CH
3) 3Bi
Humanfeces
Thisstudy
Met
hanoco
ccus
vannie
lii
DSM
1224T
CH
3AsH
2,(C
H3) 2AsH
,
(CH
3) 3As,AsX
b
(CH
3) 2Se,
(CH
3) 2SeS
(CH
3) 2Te
(CH
3) 3Sb
CH
3BiH
2,(C
H3) 3Bi
Marinemud
Michalkeet
al.,
2007
Met
han
oco
ccu
s
ma
ripa
lud
isDSM
2771
LOD
(CH
3) 2Se,
(CH3) 2Se 2
(CH
3) 2Te
(CH
3) 3Sb
(CH
3) 2BiH
,(C
H3) 3Bi
Mud
Michalkeet
al.,
2007
Met
han
ola
cin
iap
ay
nte
ri
DSM
2545T
LOD
(CH
3) 2Se,
(CH
3) 2SeS,
(CH
3) 2Se 2,SeX
b
(CH
3) 2Te
(CH
3) 3Sb
(CH
3) 2BiH
,(C
H3) 3Bi
Marinesedim
ent
Michalkeet
al.,
2007
Met
han
olo
bu
sti
nd
ari
us
DSM
2278T
LOD
(CH
3) 2Se,
SeX
b(C
H3) 2Te
CH
3SbH
2,(C
H3) 3Sb
(CH
3) 3Bi
Sedim
ent
Michalkeet
al.,
2007
Met
han
op
lan
us
lim
ico
la
DSM
2279T
(CH
3) 3As
(CH
3) 2Se,
(CH
3) 2SeS,
(CH
3) 2Se 2,SeX
b
(CH
3) 2Te,
TeX
b(C
H3) 3Sb
(CH
3) 3Bi
Mudofadrilling
swamp
Michalkeet
al.,
2007
Met
han
osa
rcin
ab
ark
eric
DSM
800T
AsH
3,AsX
b(C
H3) 2Se,
(CH
3) 2Se 2
LOD
(CH
3) 3Sb
(CH
3) 3Bi
Anaerobic
sewage
digester
Michalkeet
al.,
2000
Met
han
osa
rcin
am
aze
i
DSM
3647
(CH
3) 3As
(CH
3) 2Se,
(CH
3) 2Se 2
(CH
3) 2Te
(CH
3) 3Sb
(CH
3) 3Bi
Anaerobic
sewage
digester
F.Thomas,
unpublished
Met
han
ob
act
eriu
m
form
icic
um
DSM
1535T
AsH
3,CH
3AsH
2,
(CH
3) 2AsH
,(C
H3) 3As,
AsX
b
(CH
3) 2Se,
(CH
3) 2Se 2
(CH
3) 2Te
SbH
3,CH
3SbH
2,
(CH
3) 2SbH,(C
H3) 3Sb
BiH
3,CH
3BiH
2,
(CH
3) 2BiH
,(C
H3) 3Bi
Anaerobic
sewage
digester
Michalkeet
al.,
2007
Met
han
oth
erm
ob
act
er
ther
ma
uto
trop
hic
usDSM
1053T
AsH
3LOD
LOD
(CH
3) 3Sb
LOD
Sew
agesludge
Michalkeet
al.,
2000
J. Meyer et al. / Systematic and Applied Microbiology 31 (2008) 81–8782
![Page 3: Volatilisation of metals and metalloids: An inherent feature of methanoarchaea?](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020406/5750746c1a28abdd2e946b2c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
ARTICLE IN PRESSBacteria
Baci
llus
alc
alo
phil
usa
DSM
485T
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
Humanfeces
Thisstudy
Ba
cter
oid
esco
pro
cola
a
DSM
17136T
LOD
(CH
3) 2Se 2
(CH
3) 2Te
LOD
LOD
Humanfeces
Thisstudy
Ba
cter
oid
es
thet
aio
tao
mic
ronaDSM
2079T
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
Humanfeces
Thisstudy
Ba
cter
oid
esvu
lga
tusa
DSM
1447T
LOD
(CH
3) 2Se
(CH
3) 2Te
(CH
3) 3Sb
LOD
Humanfeces
Thisstudy
Bifi
do
ba
cter
ium
bifi
du
ma
DSM
20082
LOD
(CH
3) 2Se 2
LOD
LOD
LOD
Humanfeces
Thisstudy
Bu
tyri
vib
rio
cro
sso
tusa
DSM
2876T
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
Humanfeces
Thisstudy
Clo
stri
diu
mace
ticu
ma
DSM
1496T
LOD
(CH
3) 2Se
(CH
3) 2Te
LOD
LOD
Humanfeces
Thisstudy
Clo
stri
diu
mle
ptu
maDSM
753T
LOD
(CH
3) 2Se,
(CH
3) 2Se 2
LOD
LOD
LOD
Humanfeces
Thisstudy
Coll
inse
lla
inte
stin
ali
sa
DSM
13280T
LOD
(CH
3) 2Se 2
LOD
LOD
LOD
Humanfeces
Thisstudy
Des
ulf
ovi
bri
op
iger
a
DSM
749
LOD
LOD
LOD
LOD
(CH
3) 3Bi
Humanfeces
Thisstudy
Eu
ba
cter
ium
bif
orm
ea
DSM
3989T
LOD
(CH
3) 2Se
(CH
3) 2Te
LOD
LOD
Humanfeces
Thisstudy
Eu
ba
cter
ium
elig
ensa
DSM
3376T
LOD
(CH
3) 2Se 2
(CH
3) 2Te
LOD
(CH
3) 3Bi
Humanfeces
Thisstudy
Lact
obaci
llus
aci
dophil
usa
DSM
20079T
LOD
(CH
3) 2Se
(CH
3) 2Te
LOD
(CH
3) 3Bi
Humanfeces
Thisstudy
Ru
min
oco
ccu
sh
an
sen
iia
DSM
20583T
LOD
(CH
3) 2Se 2
LOD
LOD
LOD
Humanfeces
Thisstudy
LOD,limitofdetection.
aRegarded
asmem
bersofthehumangutflora.
bUnidentified
volatile
metal(loid)s.
cMediatedbyoctamethylcyclotetrasiloxaneortheionophoreslasalocideandmonensin[21].
J. Meyer et al. / Systematic and Applied Microbiology 31 (2008) 81–87 83
![Page 4: Volatilisation of metals and metalloids: An inherent feature of methanoarchaea?](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020406/5750746c1a28abdd2e946b2c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
ARTICLE IN PRESSJ. Meyer et al. / Systematic and Applied Microbiology 31 (2008) 81–8784
compartments of the human body, such as the oralcavity, the vagina or the gut [1,6,9,16,23,24], suggestingthat their transformation activities could affect humanhealth directly. The gut especially offers sufficient spacefor approximately 1014 anaerobic and facultativelyanaerobic microbes, including methanoarchaea. There-fore, it provides a favourable location for considerableproduction of these volatile derivatives because of itsstrictly anaerobic milieu at virtually constant neutral pHand mesophilic temperature, as well as continuoussubstrate supply. Despite previous assumptions of afacultative presence of methanoarchaea in the humangut, with an estimated proportion of methane producingindividuals of approximately 30–80% in the humanpopulation [13,14,26,27], recent research suggests anobligate presence of methanoarchaea in the humanintestine [6]. According to this, our recent studies ofhuman feces microbiota from 14 volunteers showedsignificant methane production by all feces samples ofthe cohort [K. Michalke et al., unpublished]. Unfortu-nately, our knowledge concerning the abundance anddiversity of the methanoarchaeal population in thehuman intestine and the identity of their members islimited. In fact, to date, only Methanosphaera stadtma-
nae and Methanobrevibacter smithii have been describedas typical members of the human gut microbiota [23,24].
In order to check whether the capability of metha-noarchaea to transform metal(loid)s into volatile deri-vatives represents a specific property of these organisms,we checked growing cultures of methanoarchaea iso-lated from various ecological niches, including themethanoarchaeal human gut inhabitants M. stadtmanae
and M. smithii, for production of volatile derivatives.Comparison with bacterial strains isolated from humanfeces (members of Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actino-bacteria and Bacteroidetes), which are considered as themain bacterial phyla represented in the human gutmicrobiota [6], should also provide information con-cerning the preferred role of methanoarchaea inintestinal metal(loid) derivatisation.
Materials and methods
Bacterial strains and culture media
All cultures were grown under strictly anaerobicconditions in butyl rubber-stoppered 120ml serumbottles containing 50ml of the recommended DSMZ-medium [www.dsmz.de] or in butyl rubber-stoppered17ml screw-top test tubes. The media were reduced bythe addition of L-cysteine (0.3–0.5 g l�1), pressurisedwith CO2/H2, N2 or N2/CO2, as recommended, andincubated in the dark in a rotary shaker (150 rpm) at37 1C. To avoid bacterial contamination, ampicillin
(100 mgml�1) was added to the methanoarchaea cul-tures. All strains used in this study and their source ofisolation are listed in Table 1.
Assays for production of volatile metal(loid)
derivatives in cultures of methanoarchaea and
bacteria
The cultures were spiked in the early exponentialgrowth phase (about 106 cellsml�1) with the saltsKH2AsO4, SbCl3, HgCl2, Bi(NO3)3, TeO2 and SeO2
(final concentration: 1 mM each) or with a singlemetal(loid) salt (final concentration: 1 mM). TeO2 andSbCl3 were solved in ethanol. Bi(NO3)3 was solved inpropandiol with 50mM EDTA and subsequent adjust-ment to pH 7.0 with NaOH. The production of volatilemetal(loid) derivatives was followed for up to 14 daysdepending on the growth rate of the respective organ-isms. (CH3)3Bi was synthesised with the aid of a crudeextract of Methanosarcina mazei (B. Huber et al.,unpublished). The volatile metal(loid) derivatives inthe headspace of the cultures were analysed by amodified purge-and-trap gas chromatographic systemcoupled to an inductively coupled plasma mass spectro-meter (ICP-MS; Fisons VG, PlasmaQuad II) [19].Identification was undertaken by parallel ICP-MS andelectron ionisation mass spectrometry (EI-MS) detec-tion after GC separation [17]. Growth of bacterial andmethanoarchaeal strains was followed by measuring theprotein content of the cultures using the protein assay ofBradford [3]. All experiments were performed at least intriplicate.
Results and discussion
Table 1 shows the diversity of the volatile metal(loid)derivatives produced by the various methanoarchaealand anaerobic bacterial strains following addition of amixture of inorganic salts of arsenic, antimony, bismuth,selenium, tellurium and mercury. No strain tested wasable to produce volatile methyl or hydride derivatives ofmercury. The volatile elemental mercury observed in theheadspace seemed to be of abiotic origin, as shown bysterile control samples, which contained comparableamounts of elemental mercury.
As demonstrated in Table 1, members of themethanoarchaea were in general more versatile intransforming metal(loid)s to volatile derivatives ascompared with the bacterial strains. The vast majority,including the human gut inhabitants M. stadtmanae andM. smithii, transformed the five elements arsenic,antimony, bismuth, selenium and tellurium into volatilederivatives. A somewhat restricted capability of transforma-tion was shown by the methanoarchaea Methanococcus
![Page 5: Volatilisation of metals and metalloids: An inherent feature of methanoarchaea?](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020406/5750746c1a28abdd2e946b2c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Table 2. Maximum production rates of methanoarchaea and
bacteria for the formation of volatile bismuth and selenium
derivatives
Microorganisms Maximum production rates
(fmol h�1mg�1 protein)
Bismuth derivatives Selenium
derivatives
Methanoarchaea
M. stadtmanaea (CH3)3Bi: 8.675.7 (CH3)2Se:
206.2725.1
(CH3)2SeS:
2.370.9
(CH3)2Se2:
4.071.2
SeX:b 0.370.1
M. smithiia (CH3)3Bi: 18.673.5 (CH3)2Se:
39.3712.0
(CH3)2SeS:
0.170.1
(CH3)2Se2:
0.170.1
SeX:b 0.170.1
M. vannielii (CH3)3Bi: 24.1673.2 (CH3)2Se:
45.779.0
(CH3)2SeS:
0.170.0
M. maripaludis (CH3)3Bi: 30.171.6 (CH3)2Se:
65.2738.0
(CH3)2Se2:
0.670.2
M. paynteri (CH3)3Bi: 6.973.6 (CH3)2Se:
77.1718.1
(CH3)2SeS:
0.170.1
(CH3)2Se2:
1.670.3
SeX:b 0.270.2
M. tindarius (CH3)3Bi: 16.676.1 (CH3)2Se:
61.9716.3
SeX:b 0.170.0
M. limicola (CH3)3Bi: 18.574.5 (CH3)2Se:
53.7718.5
(CH3)2SeS:
2.170.8
(CH3)2Se2:
0.670.2
SeX:b 0.270.1
M. barkeric (CH3)3Bi: 54.0719.6 LOD
M. mazei (CH3)3Bi:
1698.771628.6
LOD
M. formicicum (CH3)3Bi:
145.4770.5
LOD
M.
thermautotrophicus
LOD LOD
J. Meyer et al. / Systematic and Applied Microbiology 31 (2008) 81–87 85
maripaludis, Methanolacinia paynteri and Methanolobus
tindarius, which were not able to produce volatile arsenicderivatives. The exceptionally low diversity of volatilederivatisation products in the case of Methanothermobacter
thermautotrophicus could be explained by the elevatedgrowth temperature of this organism (Topt: 65 1C), whichmay lead to rapid heat destruction of the volatiles and thusto a seemingly low derivatisation potential [22].
As compared with the methanoarchaeal strains, thebacterial members assigned to the human gut micro-biota produced a significantly smaller spectrum ofvolatile metal(loid) derivatives, both for the number ofmetal(loid)s transformed and the number of derivativesproduced per element. In the cultures of Butyrivibrio
crossotus, Bacillus alcalophilus and Bacteroides thetaio-
taomicron, no volatile derivatives could be observed.The majority of the selected bacterial strains (10 out of14) were able to transform selenium into volatilederivatives and tellurium was transformed in additionto selenium by 6 strains, whereas only 4 bacterial strains(Lactobacillus acidophilus, Eubacterium eligens, Bacter-
oides vulgatus, Desulfovibrio piger) were able to volatiliseadditional elements from bismuth and antimony,respectively.
The higher capability of methanoarchaeal strains totransform metal(loid)s into volatile derivatives, com-pared to the bacterial strains, was also reflected in thederivatisation reaction rates. For this comparison, wechose the derivatisation of selenium, which is atransformation shared by all methanoarchaea tested(with the apparent exception of M. thermautotrophicus)and by most of the bacterial strains. Additionally, weincluded the derivatisation of bismuth to (CH3)3Bi in thecomparison, since this transformation is a healthconcern due to the increasing application of bismuthin cosmetics and pharmaceuticals, as well as the hightoxicity of its permethylated product [28]. As shown inTable 2, the formation rates of the various volatilederivatives of both elements were higher mostly inmethanoarchaea compared to bacteria.
Since methanoarchaea isolated from different envir-onmental locations are characterised by a remarkablyversatile and excessive transformation of metal(loid)s,this ability seems to represent an inherent methanoarch-aeal feature. It seems reasonable to assume thereforethat this high methylation activity on metal(loid)s is due,at least partially, to the multiplicity of their methyl-transfer reactions.
In order to assess the effect of volatile metal(loid)son co-inhabitants of the human gut microbiota, weexposed growing cultures of B. thetaiotaomicron, arepresentative of the so-called physiological microbiotaof the human gut, to (CH3)3Bi and followed its growthresponse. As shown in Fig. 1, an inhibitory effect on thegrowth of B. thetaiotaomicron was apparent at (CH3)3Biconcentrations of 5.7 nM and above. This indicates that
![Page 6: Volatilisation of metals and metalloids: An inherent feature of methanoarchaea?](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020406/5750746c1a28abdd2e946b2c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Table 2. (continued )
Microorganisms Maximum production rates
(fmol h�1mg�1 protein)
Bismuth derivatives Selenium
derivatives
Bacteria
B. coprocolaa LOD (CH3)2Se2:
0.370.1
B. vulgatusa LOD (CH3)2Se:
0.170.1
B. bifiduma LOD (CH3)2Se2:
0.870.2
B. crossotusa LOD LOD
B. alcalophilusa LOD LOD
B.
thetaiotaomicronaLOD LOD
C. aceticuma LOD (CH3)2Se:
0.370.3
C. leptuma LOD (CH3)2Se:
1.870.6
(CH3)2Se2:
0.170.1
C. intestinalisa LOD (CH3)2Se2:
0.370.1
D. pigera (CH3)3Bi: 0.3670.26 LOD
E. bioformea LOD (CH3)2Se:
0.370.0
E. eligensa (CH3)3Bi: 0.0770.01 (CH3)2Se2:
0.270.0
L. acidophilusa (CH3)3Bi: 0.3670.28 (CH3)2Se2:
0.470.1
R. hanseniia LOD (CH3)2Se2:
0.370.1
LOD, limit of detection.aRegarded as members of the human gut flora.bUnidentified selenium derivative.cMediated by octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane or the ionophores
lasalocide and monensin [21].
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14Incubation time (h)
Opt
ical
den
sity
(600
nm
) Control2.9 nM(CH3)3Bi5.7 nM(CH3)3Bi17 nM(CH3)3Bi
Fig. 1. Influence of (CH3)3Bi on the growth of Bacteroides
thetaiotaomicron. (CH3)3Bi was added before inoculation with
a 1% stock culture of B. thetaiotaomicron.
J. Meyer et al. / Systematic and Applied Microbiology 31 (2008) 81–8786
the volatile (CH3)3Bi exerts toxic effects on bacteriabelonging to the beneficial intestinal microbiota. How-ever, since we do not know the in vivo intestinalconcentrations it seems premature to deduce from thisthat there is a general risk of damaging the intestinalmicrobiota. Nevertheless, an examination of fecessamples taken from volunteers who ingested bismuthsubcitrate (Michalke et al., submitted for publication)showed that the production rates of (CH3)3Bi in thefeces were in the same order of magnitude as thosefound in batch cultures of methanoarchaea. Fecessamples examined produced this compound at rates of2.3–28,000 fmol h�1 g�1 wet weight (corresponding to aproduction of approximately 1012 total cells or approxi-mately 1010 to 1011 methanoarchaeal cells, respectively[6,25]). This is comparable with the productivity of
exponential cultures of M. smithii with rates of3.5 fmol h�1ml�1 at cell counts of 107ml�1. Since thereis a lack of in vivo data for the intestinum, estimates ofthe intestinal (CH3)3Bi concentration have to be basedon data from pure culture experiments with variousmethanoarchaea (Meyer et al., unpublished), and thesehave shown that (CH3)3Bi is accumulated up toapproximately 0.5 nM. From this, the inhibition ofthe gut microbiota by (CH3)3Bi under in vivo conditionsseems to be, at first glance, rather improbable. However,considering that the high cell density in the gut couldfacilitate the transfer of the volatile derivative fromproducer to target cells by direct cell contacts, (CH3)3Bicould nevertheless inhibit the growth of gut co-inhabitants at lower concentrations. Consequently,respective interactions will be investigated in gnotobioticmice.
Acknowledgements
The work was supported by grants from the DeutscheForschungsgemeinschaft (DFG). We would like tothank the working group of A.V. Hirner, Dept. ofEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry, University ofDuisburg-Essen for analytical assistance.
References
[1] N. Belay, B. Mukhopadhyay, E. Conway de Macario,
R. Galask, L. Daniels, Methanogenic bacteria in human
vaginal samples, J. Clin. Microbiol. 28 (1990) 1666–1668.
[2] R. Bentley, T.G. Chasteen, Microbial methylation of
metal(loid)s: Arsenic, antimony, and bismuth, Microbiol.
Mol. Biol. Rev. 66 (2002) 250–271.
[3] M. Bradford, A rapid and sensitive method for the
quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing
![Page 7: Volatilisation of metals and metalloids: An inherent feature of methanoarchaea?](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022020406/5750746c1a28abdd2e946b2c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
ARTICLE IN PRESSJ. Meyer et al. / Systematic and Applied Microbiology 31 (2008) 81–87 87
the principle of protein-dye binding, Anal. Biochem. 72
(1976) 248–254.
[4] P.J. Craig (Ed.), Organometallic compounds in the
environment, Wiley, 2002.
[5] E. Dopp, L.M. Hartmann, A.M. Florea, U. von
Recklinghausen, R. Pieper, B. Shokouhi, A.W. Retten-
meier, A.V. Hirner, G. Obe, Uptake of trivalent and
pentavalent inorganic and methylated arsenicals and
association with cytotoxic and genotoxic effects in
Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, Toxicol. Appl.
Pharmacol. 201 (2004) 156–165.
[6] P.B. Eckburg, E.M. Bik, C.N. Bernstein, E. Purdom,
L. Dethlefsen, M. Sargent, S.R. Gill, K.E. Nelson,
D.A. Relman, Diversity of the human intestinal microbial
flora, Science 308 (2005) 1635–1638.
[7] J. Feldmann, R. Grumping, A.V. Hirner, Determination
of volatile metal and metalloid compounds in gases from
domestic waste deposits with GC/ICP-MS, Fresenius
J. Anal. Chem. 350 (1994) 228–234.
[8] J. Feldmann, A.V. Hirner, Occurrence of volatile metal
and metalloid species in landfill and sewage gases, Int.
J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 60 (1995) 339–359.
[9] A. Ferrari, T. Brusa, A. Rutili, E. Canzi, B. Biavati,
Isolation and characterization of Methanobrevibacter
oralis sp. nov, Curr. Microbiol. 29 (1994) 7–12.
[10] G.M. Gadd, Microbial formation and transformation
of organometallic compounds, FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 11
(1993) 297–316.
[11] B. Gosio, Zur Frage, wodurch die Giftigkeit arsenhaltiger
Tapeten bedingt wird, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. 30 (1897)
1024–1027.
[12] J. Gruner, K. Kruger, N. Binding, M. Madeja, U. Mußhoff,
Effects of organometal(loid) compounds on neuronal
ion channels: possible sites for neurotoxicity, in: A.V.
Hirner, H. Emons (Eds.), Organic Metal and Metalloid
Species in the Environment, Springer, Heidelberg, 2004,
pp. 283–310.
[13] J.H. Hackstein, T.A. Van Alen, H. Op Den Camp,
A. Smits, E. Mariman, Intestinal methanogenesis in
primates – a genetic and evolutionary approach, Dtsch
Tierarztl. Wschr. 102 (1995) 152–154.
[14] M.J. Hudson, A.M. Tomkins, H.S. Wiggins, B.S. Drasar,
Breath methane excretion and intestinal methanogenesis in
children and adults in rural Nigeria, Scand. J. Gastroenterol.
28 (1993) 993–998.
[15] W.T. Klimecki, D.E. Carter, Arsine toxicity: chemical
and mechanistic implications, J. Toxicol. Environ. Health
46 (1995) 399–409.
[16] E.M. Kulik, H. Sandmeier, K. Hinni, J. Meyer, Identi-
fication of archaeal rDNA from subgingival dental plaque
by pcr amplification and sequence analysis, FEMS
Microbiol. Lett. 196 (2001) 129–133.
[17] J. Meyer, A. Schmidt, K. Michalke, R. Hensel, Volatilisa-
tion of metals and metalloids by the microbial population
of an alluvial soil, Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 30 (2007)
229–238.
[18] K. Michalke, R. Hensel, Microbial biotransformations
of metal(loid)s, in: A.V. Hirner, H. Emons (Eds.),
Organic Metal and Metalloid Species in the Environment:
Analysis, Distribution, Processes and Toxicological Eva-
luation, Springer, Heidelberg, 2004, pp. 137–150.
[19] K. Michalke, E.B. Wickenheiser, M. Mehring, A.V.
Hirner, R. Hensel, Production of volatile derivates of
metal(loid)s by microflora involved in anaerobic digestion
of sewage sludge, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66 (2000)
2791–2796.
[20] K. Michalke, J. Meyer, A.V. Hirner, R. Hensel,
Biomethylation of bismuth by the methanogen Methano-
bacterium formicicum, Appl. Organometal. Chem. 16
(2002) 221–227.
[21] K. Michalke, J. Meyer, R. Hensel, Effect of octamethylcy-
clotetrasiloxane on methylation of bismuth by Methanosar-
cina barkeri, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72 (2006) 6819–6821.
[22] K. Michalke, J. Meyer, R. Hensel, Methylation metal
(loid)s by methanoarchaea: production of volatile deriva-
tives with high ecotoxicological impact and health
concern, in: R.A. Garrett, H.P. Klenk (Eds.), Archaea:
Evolution, Physiology, and Molecular Biology, Blackwell
Publishing, Oxford, 2007, pp. 285–293.
[23] T.L. Miller, M.J. Wolin, Isolation of Methanobrevibacter
smithii from human feces, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 43
(1982) 227–232.
[24] T.L. Miller, M.J. Wolin, Methanosphaera stadtmaniae
gen. nov., sp. nov.: a species that forms methane by
reducing methanol with hydrogen, Arch. Microbiol. 141
(1985) 116–122.
[25] T.L. Miller, M.J. Wolin, Methanogens in human and
animal intestinal tracts, Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 7 (1986)
223–229.
[26] P. Pitt, K.M. de Bruijn, M.F. Beeching, E. Goldberg,
L.M. Blendis, Studies on breath methane: the effect of
ethnic origins and lactulose, Gut 21 (1989) 951–954.
[27] I. Segal, A.R. Walker, S. Lord, J.H. Cummings, Breath
methane and large bowel cancer risk in contrasting
African populations, Gut 29 (1988) 608–613.
[28] T. Sollmann, J. Seifter, The pharmacology of trimethyl
bismuth, J. Pharmacol. Ther. 67 (1939) 17–49.
[29] J.S. Thayer, Biological methylation of less-studied ele-
ments, Appl. Organometal. Chem. 16 (2002) 677–691.
[30] I. Walter, T. Schwerdtle, C. Thuy, J.L. Parsons, G.L.
Dianov, A. Hartwig, Impact of arsenite and its metylated
metabolites on PARP-1 activity, PARP-1 gene expression
and poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation in cultured human cells,
DNA Repair 6 (2007) 61–70.