VISTA: The Telescope challenge

40
VISTA: The Telescope challenge Systems Engineering the Solution?

description

VISTA: The Telescope challenge. Systems Engineering the Solution?. UK ATC Project Office Proposal - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of VISTA: The Telescope challenge

Page 1: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

VISTA: The Telescope challengeSystems Engineering the Solution?

Page 2: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

Systems Engineering at the Core of VISTA Design

• UK ATC Project Office Proposal• “The purpose of VISTA is to conduct large-scale semi-

automated surveys of the sky at IR and visible wavelengths. Our concept of VISTA is not a conventional 4m telescope with instruments. We regard VISTA as a single integrated camera with an IR and a Visible channel, in which the "telescope" is really the fore-optics.”

Page 3: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

Phase A and Phase B• Phase A proposal

– Can VISTA actually be achieved for the Money?– Develop designs to level to demonstrate compliance with Science

Requirements– Determine the best strategy for maximising functionality within budget and

timescales– Agree Strategy and Deliverables before starting Phase B

• Phase B– Follows successful Phase A– Same personnel– Procurement– Testing– Integration– Commissioning

• Enhanced VISTA– Additional funding for full functionality

Page 4: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

Cost v’s Change v’s Time

12 Dec 2000 Scrutiny Panel Presentation 4

Page 5: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

Cost v’s Change v’s Time

12 Dec 2000 Scrutiny Panel Presentation 5

End Phase A

Page 6: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

Cost v’s Change v’s Time

12 Dec 2000 Scrutiny Panel Presentation 6

End Phase A

By the end of Phase A the design is essentially locked in

Page 7: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

12 Dec 2000 Scrutiny Panel Presentation 7

Design Development

• JIF Design Baseline resulting in f/2.5 primary• Brainstorm of various layouts• f/1 identified as potential cost saver• f/1 and f/2.5 progressed to level demonstrating a clear

advantage to the f/1 design• Need to concentrate on one design• MO recommended proceeding with f/1 design

– scheduled Design Validation Review– VEB approved development of f/1 in interim as long lead procurement

Page 8: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

12 Dec 2000 Scrutiny Panel Presentation 8

VISTA Designs

• f/2.5 “JIF design” • f/1 with both instruments mounted at

cassegrain focus• f/1 was clearly more cost effective

– f/1 has tolerance issues on M2• Design still based on 3x3 array

Page 9: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

12 Dec 2000 Scrutiny Panel Presentation 9

The Design Validation Review

• Purpose– Review choice of design

• MO has identified f/1 type design as most suitable for VISTA

• Close out all design other optical layouts

– Determine of choice is correct– Identify any issues in adopting this

approach

Page 10: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

The ESO involvement

• Who’s the Customer?• Vista Consortium?• ESO?

• Pros and Cons– Site– Standards

• Requirements• SOWs• Software definition• Hardware definition

– 3x3 to 4x4 focal plane

12 Dec 2000 Scrutiny Panel Presentation 10

Page 11: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

The ESO involvement

• Who’s the Customer?• Vista Consortium?• ESO?

• Pros and Cons– Site– Standards

• Requirements• SOWs• Software definition• Hardware definition

– 3x3 to 4x4 focal plane

12 Dec 2000 Scrutiny Panel Presentation 11

Consortium

ESO

Page 12: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

The ESO involvement

• Who’s the Customer?• Vista Consortium?• ESO?

• Pros and Cons– Site– Standards

• Requirements• SOWs• Software definition• Hardware definition

– 3x3 to 4x4 focal plane

12 Dec 2000 Scrutiny Panel Presentation 12

Consortium

ESO

Page 13: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

Filming “OO7: Quantum of Solace”

Page 14: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

12 Dec 2000 Scrutiny Panel Presentation 14

Paranal Geology• Where is the

bedrock?– Plateau 20m

excavation– NTT 5m

leveling

• What about construction?– Plateau: Dust, noise

pollution• What about Utilities?

– Plateau £0.3m– NTT £0.5m

Page 15: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

12 Dec 2000 Scrutiny Panel Presentation 15

Page 16: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge
Page 17: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

The ESO involvement

• Who’s the Customer?• Vista Consortium?• ESO?

• Pros and Cons– Site– Standards

• Requirements• SOWs• Software definition• Hardware definition

– 3x3 to 4x4 focal plane

12 Dec 2000 Scrutiny Panel Presentation 17

Consortium

ESO

Page 18: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

Requirements

• All requirements:– Shall be unambiguous and tied to performance metrics that

are verifiable, achievable and realistic. – Shall not be solution specific, vague or impossible to

verify.

12 Dec 2000 Scrutiny Panel Presentation 18

Page 19: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

and Goals?• Goals are not requirements.

– Though they may become requirements• Logical development (with additional resources, funding etc.)• By osmosis – Spec creep

• Goals: – shall not be needed to achieve the science performance (that is a requirement). – Each goal must have an underlying requirement. – As soon as cost and/or schedule are compromised by a goal, the goal is either

amended or dropped. – The only benefit of including a goal is during in the early stages of

development, steering choices between design options.

12 Dec 2000 Scrutiny Panel Presentation 19

Page 20: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

12 Dec 2000 Scrutiny Panel Presentation 20

Page 21: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

The ESO involvement

• Who’s the Customer?• Vista Consortium?• ESO?

• Pros and Cons– Site– Standards

• Requirements• SOWs• Software definition• Hardware definition

– 3x3 to 4x4 NIR focal plane

12 Dec 2000 Scrutiny Panel Presentation 21

Consortium

ESO

Page 22: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

Spec creep?

12 Dec 2000 Scrutiny Panel Presentation 22

Page 23: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

Spec creep?

12 Dec 2000 Scrutiny Panel Presentation 23

It was not the size of the focal plane but the cold stop re-imaging requirement that made this a technical issue.( not to mention cost of detectors and controllers)

Page 24: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

12 Dec 2000 Scrutiny Panel Presentation 24

VISTA Designs

• f/2.5 “JIF design” • f/1 with both instruments mounted at

cassegrain focus• f/1 was clearly more cost effective

– f/1 has tolerance issues on M2• Design still based on 3x3 array

Page 25: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

12 Dec 2000 Scrutiny Panel Presentation 25

VISTA Designs

“The purpose of VISTA is to conduct large-scale semi-automated surveys of the sky at IR and visible wavelengths. Our concept of VISTA is not a conventional 4m telescope with instruments. We regard VISTA as a single integrated camera with an IR and a Visible channel, in which the "telescope" is really the fore-optics.”

Page 26: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

12 Dec 2000 Scrutiny Panel Presentation 26

VISTA Designs“The purpose of VISTA is to conduct large-scale semi-automated surveys of the sky at IR and visible wavelengths. Our concept of VISTA is not a conventional 4m telescope with instruments. We regard VISTA as a single integrated camera with an IR and a Visible channel, in which the "telescope" is really the fore-optics.”

End Phase A

Page 27: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

12 Dec 2000 Scrutiny Panel Presentation 27

On Axis IR camera - cold baffles

Page 28: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

12 Dec 2000 Scrutiny Panel Presentation 28

Page 29: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

12 Dec 2000 Scrutiny Panel Presentation 29

Encircled Energy at Ks

Page 30: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

VISTA Field of View

Page 31: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

12 Dec 2000 Scrutiny Panel Presentation 31

Page 32: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

12 Dec 2000 Scrutiny Panel Presentation 32

End Phase A

By the end of Phase A the design was essentially locked in

Page 33: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

12 Dec 2000 Scrutiny Panel Presentation 33

Page 34: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

12 Dec 2000 Scrutiny Panel Presentation 34

Page 35: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

12 Dec 2000 Scrutiny Panel Presentation 35

Page 36: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

12 Dec 2000 Scrutiny Panel Presentation 36

Page 37: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

12 Dec 2000 Scrutiny Panel Presentation 37

Page 38: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

12 Dec 2000 Scrutiny Panel Presentation 38

Page 39: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge
Page 40: VISTA:  The Telescope challenge

Acknowledgements

12 Dec 2000 Scrutiny Panel Presentation 40

• Key players– Adrian Russell– Jim Emerson– Will Sutherland

• VISTA f/1 guilty party– Mark Casalli– Eli Atad– Martin Fisher– Stefano Stangellini

• Presentation– Andy Born