Visitor monitoring to strengthen protected area management (2015)

15
Visitor monitoring to strengthen protected area management Professor Susan Moore International Conference on Ecotourism in Protected Areas: Strengthening Conservation, Development and Adaptation 19 – 21 May 2015 Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar

Transcript of Visitor monitoring to strengthen protected area management (2015)

Visitor monitoring to strengthen protected area management

Professor Susan Moore

International Conference on Ecotourism in Protected Areas: Strengthening Conservation, Development and Adaptation

19 – 21 May 2015

Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar

What information? Information focus Includes…

Visit / visitor numbers Visit numbers at site, park, region &/or country level

Visitor characteristics Demographic information, reasons for visiting, attitudes & motivations

Visit characteristics Sites visited, group size, length of stay, activities undertaken, expenditure

Visitor outcomes Satisfaction, experiences, disappointments, future intentions

Monitoring visitor numbers – national level

!  Survey international departures at airports (e.g. IVS Australia, Parks Victoria)

!  Survey country’s/state’s residents by phone to determine park visitation (e.g. Parks Victoria)

Monitoring visitor numbers – park system & individual

park level !  Automated vehicle classifiers & counters

!  Entrance ticket sales

!  Visitor books

!  Guestimates

Monitoring visitor patterns of use

!  Aerial surveys (esp for marine parks)

Example. Ningaloo Reef Marine Park •  300 km fringing reef •  200,000 visitors p.a. •  2-4 flights/month for 1 year •  Counts of boats, camps & people •  GPS data loggers & synchronised

digital cameras

Monitoring visitor patterns of use (cont.)

!  Tour records & log books

Example. Whale shark tourism Ningaloo •  15 licensed tourism operators •  Required to provide log book details

on visitor numbers.

Tracking patterns of use Tracker type Focus of tracking

1.  'Passive’ sensing using track counters, video cameras

Visitors on tracks & trails, at information centres

2.  Detection of specific signals:

a)  Location restricted e.g. mobile phone tracking

Visitors (esp in hard-to-access areas)

b)  Location independent – GPS based Vehicles & boats (e.g. tour boats)

a b

Visitor & visit characteristics: questionnaires

!  Park survey with onsite questionnaire

!  Web-based survey

Example. Yanchep National Park •  Visitor questionnaire

administered onsite •  Overall satisfaction

with visit •  Satisfaction metric

reported to State Parliament annually

Visitor characteristics: future intentions

!  Intentions include !  Re-visiting !  Recommending to others

!  Paying fees ! Advocating for/supporting

protected areas

!  Volunteering time

Collecting, storing & accessing visitor information REQUIRED

1.  Visitor management system (with protocols) for collecting, storing & accessing information

2.  Easy-to-access & manage database

3.  Reliable, long-term storage system

Using visitor information

Park management plans

National development strategies

Community development plans

Reserve designation & resource allocations

Enhancing visitors’ experiences

Economic evaluations

Marketing

Cost-effective visitor monitoring

!  Best practice visitor monitoring system (copy, & be copied)

!  Cost-effective spatial & temporal sampling decisions (not all parks, not every year)

!  Multiple sources of information (ecotours, park entry numbers, national exit surveys)

TAPAS Group

Knowledge development Communities

Capacity building Networking Chair, Dr Anna Spenceley

Photo credits: Susan Moore, Anna Spenceley, Lynnath Beckley, internet - various