vish wc ppt

8/6/2019 vish wc ppt

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/vish-wc-ppt 1/15

Inception Workshop

India Country Programme EvaluationMattia Prayer Galletti, [email protected] Delhi, 13 February 2009

Mattia Prayer Galletti, Country Programme Manager, Asia Division and the Pacific, IFAD

[email protected]



Objectives of the Presentation

1. Description of the main elements of:

± India Country Strategy (COSOP)

± IFAD-Supported Interventions

± New ´Modus Operandiµ

2. Expectations and Commitment from/to CPE



COSOP (2005-2009)

Mission

� Committed to work in resource poor areas

� Focus on disadvantaged social groups

� Focus on building social capital through community mobilization,grassroots institutions.

� Strong collaboration with Governments and civil society partners.� Strengthening Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs)

Strategic Thrusts:

� Grassroots institution building among marginalised groups

� Strengthen supporting agencies� Promote access to productive resources

� Promote diversification of livelihoods implemented through community

institutions/user groups



Selected Features of COSOP

Strategic Niches: Innovation, Institutional Sustainability, Targeting,Response to Government

Priority States: Orissa, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, North-East, plus

MP, UP, Tamil Nadu, and Maharasthra

Priority Target Groups: Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Women,

Coastal Fisherfolks, Smallholders in marginal, rainfed and upland

areas, Rural Youth

Cross-Cutting Issues: Sustainable Agriculture, NGO Partnerships, Gender

Manistreaming, HIV/AIDS

Intervention Opportunities:Micro-Finance Services, Women·s

Empowerment, Livelihoods in Semi-Arid Areas, in Mid-Gangetic Plains,

in Coastal Areas, Tribal Development in North-East



Strategic Themes

� Maximizing Net Returns and Income: ± Adopt appropriate technology

± Reduce post-harvest losses

± Increase economic value at farm level

± Shorten value chain and move smallholders up

± Ensure security of land tenure ± Ensure access to rural services and productive resources

� Minimizing Risks: ± Diversification of income generation opportunities

± Climate change adaptation and mitigations measures ± Demand-driven financial services and micro-insuranceproducts

± Reduction of financial exposure

± Price volatility



Selected Innovations

Innovations: ± Self-Help Groups/Community Resource Centres

± Allocation of Land Titles onSloping Land

± Social Venture Capital Company

± Design and Supervision Process

Emerging Ideas

± From productivity/unit of land to productivity/unit of labour/unitof water/unit of energy

± Institutionalize market-led investment opportunities

± Convergence with GOI/SGs programs

± New financial instruments� Clean development mechanisms

� Remittances

� Contract farming

� Micro-Insurances



North East ³Model´: 11 Key-Success Factors

1. Recognition of Role of Traditional Institutions2. Trust Communities and Give Communities the Driving Seat

± Ensure a genuine bottom-up approach ± Transfer financial authority

3. Build on their Strengths ± Smallholder productivity ± Potential in uplands ± Unexploited potential of available (dry-land) technology

4. Establish/Strengthen Inclusive Grassroots Institutions ± SHGs ± Natural Resources Management Groups ± Watershed Users¶s Associations ± Producers Groups ± Gram Sabhas

5. Ensure Visioning at all Levels, by all implementing partners

6. Manage Flexibility

7. Achieve Convergence

8. Ensure Market Linkages9. Sustainability of Institutions and Livelihoods

10. Continuity in Pro ject Management Staff

11. Change Attitude ± From Assistance to Self-Reliance to Empowerment

± Provide capacity to access external institutions, credit



JTDP: Convergence Achievements

� Convergence Initiatives

� Solar Light, Fingerling Nursery

� Integrated Fish Farming, FishCard

� Improved Breed of poultry, FFS,� Lac cultivation, Vermi-compost,

� Marketing of NTFP, Group Farm

� Forestry and Agro-Forestry,

� Low Cost Latrine, Capacity

� Building of project staff & NGO

� Health Card

�

� Supporting Agencies

� JREDA, M ART, Fishery

� department, BAU, Agri. Dept

� IINRG, RKM, Animal

� Husbandry dept., Forest dept.� BAIF, AFC, ICRISAT,

� MESO, HARP, Health Dept.

� Water and Sanitation Dept.

� Identified RNGO, NABARD

� PRDIS, Department of

� Soil and Water conservation,

ICAR etc



New Business Model

� Country Programme Approach ± Portfolio (Loans and Grants)

± Implementation Support

± Knowledge Management and Innovations

± Partnership Development ± Policy/Advocacy

� Direct Supervision

� IFAD Country Office

� Country Programme Management Team



Process Innovations - Design

± GOI¶s Key Role in screening applications:

� Ensure State Government¶s commitment from the outset

� Training of SGs on development partners¶policies

± State Government¶s Engagement� Transfer the lead in the design process

� Early designation of key pro ject staff

� Ensuring continuity in management staff

± Multi-Stakeholders Engagement� Mobilize Private Sector, NGOs, Academia and Research, Commercial Banks, from the

design

� Identification of synergies based on mutual complementarities

± Pre-Implementation Activities� Early training of management staff

� Preparation of Pro ject Implementation Manual before Loan Negotiations

� Reduce gap between design and implementation



Process Innovations - Supervision

± From Supervision to Joint Review Mission«.� Ensure participation of Central Line Agencies and State

Governments in JRM

� Discussion of recommendations with all implementing partners.Close follow-up on agreed actions

� Critical role of District Collectors, where convergence comes toplay

± « and Implementation Support� Pro ject management to indicate support needs

� Increased horizontal sharing of experiences

� Continuous backstopping from Delhi office

� Investing in management skills: ± Results and Impact Management System and M&E ± Results Oriented Annual Work Plan & Budget

± Rural Micro-Enterprises and Marketing

± FinancialManagement

± Knowledge Management: Information sharing and dissemination

± Website ( www.enrap.org.in and publications)



Partnership Development

GOI: DEA/MOF, Planning Commission, MOTA, MPR, DONER/NEC, MWCD, ,MOA, M ARD

SGs: Orissa, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, Uttarakhand, Meghalaya, Maharasthra,

MP, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu,UP, Bihar

IFIs/UN: WFP, WB, FAO, UNIDO, UNDP, UNIFEM, UNICEF, AsDB

Bilaterals: DFID, GTZ, Italy, CIDA, SDCCGIAR/Grants: ICAR, ICRISAT, ICIMOD, WAC, INBAR, IRRI, CIAT, ENRAP,

WOCAN

NGOs:Myrada, MSSRF, Dhan Foundation, BAIF, SEWA, WOTR, PRADAN,

RGF, SERP, Basix, Agragamee, BASIL, M ART, AIDM AT

Banks: NABARD, SIDBIPrivate/Corporate: SRTT, ITC

Universities: IHD, Delhi Univ.

Local NGOs and Districts



Meeting GOI/IFAD Expectations

1. FROM GOI

± Pro jects as ³Islands of Excellence´

± Test Innovations and Development Models

± Sharing Ideas and Knowledge Management

± Reality Check on Existing Policies/Programs (NREGA, PESA)

± Enhancing Effectiveness of Public Expenditure throughConvergence

± Contribute to more inclusive growth

± Scaling±up successful operations

± Respond to emerging GOI¶s requests (Post-Tsunami and Vidhar ba)

2. FROM IFAD ± Active involvement during design

± Continuity in Management Staff

± Close Follow-up during Pro ject Implementation

± Ownership of State Governments



Expectations from CPE

± Awareness about the expectations of IFAD¶s EBand challenging objectives as first CPE in India

± Mutual learning exercise

± Learn from both shortcomings as well as

achievements ± Interact as much as possible

± Capture views of all our stakeholders, the ³IFAD¶s

extended family´

± Not ³scared´ about differences, but value them ± Consider corporate-level implications with regard

to innovations piloted in India

± Pave the way for the next RB-COSOP (2010-1015)



Commitment

From our side:

± Full support throughout the CPE

± Comprehensive and open self-assessment ± 100% commitment to work on the agreed

recommendations

± ³whatever we do, there is always room to

do it better´

vish wc ppt

Documents

Transcript of vish wc ppt