Virtualization Assessment Example
-
Upload
koesteruk22 -
Category
Technology
-
view
2.564 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Virtualization Assessment Example
![Page 1: Virtualization Assessment Example](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042715/559a86b91a28ab357d8b4705/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
A c c e l e r a t i n g Y o u r S u c c e s s ™
November 14, 2008
David Koester Account MangerJim Wallburg Project ManagerTom Lorenz Technology ArchitectMike Fee IT Financial Consultant
Customer in Cincinnati, OHWindows® Server Consolidation ProjectInitial Presentation
![Page 2: Virtualization Assessment Example](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042715/559a86b91a28ab357d8b4705/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2A c c e l e r a t i n g Y o u r S u c c e s s ™ 2
Agenda
• Introductions
• Overview of Project
• Review and discuss captured performance metrics
• Review initial analysis and confirm architecture assumptions
• Review initial analysis and confirm financial assumptions
• Solicit changes to prepare for the final presentation and report
• Next Steps
![Page 3: Virtualization Assessment Example](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042715/559a86b91a28ab357d8b4705/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3A c c e l e r a t i n g Y o u r S u c c e s s ™ 3
Business Goals of Consolidation•Server hardware approaching end of life
•Control data center footprint
•Reduce electricity and cooling expense
![Page 4: Virtualization Assessment Example](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042715/559a86b91a28ab357d8b4705/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4A c c e l e r a t i n g Y o u r S u c c e s s ™ 4
Consolidation Impact Assessment• Considers both the Technical and Financial Impact of Server and
Storage Consolidation• Uses the VMware Capacity Planner tool
– Non-disruptively captures hardware and software inventory from current environment
– Measures actual utilization of servers and records the peak workloads– Uses peak workloads to create consolidation scenario(s)– Used data collected by VMware from July 19 to September 5, 2008
• Model Financial Impact using Brigham-Gapenski Methodology– Based on Intermediate Financial Management, 5th Edition (1996)– Follows the model for evaluating asset replacement “Investment Decisions”– Provides a familiar analysis for those in finance who support IT– Develops a Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) baseline of current environment– Compares the baseline to the TCO of the recommended environment(s)– Provides a detailed Return On Investment analysis
![Page 5: Virtualization Assessment Example](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042715/559a86b91a28ab357d8b4705/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5A c c e l e r a t i n g Y o u r S u c c e s s ™ 5
High Level View – A Dashboard
![Page 6: Virtualization Assessment Example](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042715/559a86b91a28ab357d8b4705/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6A c c e l e r a t i n g Y o u r S u c c e s s ™ 6
Inventory Details - Chassis
![Page 7: Virtualization Assessment Example](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042715/559a86b91a28ab357d8b4705/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7A c c e l e r a t i n g Y o u r S u c c e s s ™ 7
Inventory Details – CPU
![Page 8: Virtualization Assessment Example](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042715/559a86b91a28ab357d8b4705/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8A c c e l e r a t i n g Y o u r S u c c e s s ™ 8
Inventory Details – NIC’s
![Page 9: Virtualization Assessment Example](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042715/559a86b91a28ab357d8b4705/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9A c c e l e r a t i n g Y o u r S u c c e s s ™ 9
Weekly Loads – Business Hours
![Page 10: Virtualization Assessment Example](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042715/559a86b91a28ab357d8b4705/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10A c c e l e r a t i n g Y o u r S u c c e s s ™ 10
Weekly Loads – Peak Hours
![Page 11: Virtualization Assessment Example](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042715/559a86b91a28ab357d8b4705/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11A c c e l e r a t i n g Y o u r S u c c e s s ™ 11
Processor Peak Load & Peak Hour
![Page 12: Virtualization Assessment Example](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042715/559a86b91a28ab357d8b4705/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12A c c e l e r a t i n g Y o u r S u c c e s s ™ 12
Vintage System
![Page 13: Virtualization Assessment Example](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042715/559a86b91a28ab357d8b4705/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13A c c e l e r a t i n g Y o u r S u c c e s s ™ 13
Created Scenarios
NameServers
In ConsolidatedNot
ConsolidatedNew
Servers
Consolidation
Ratios x:1
All servers to BL460c 3.0Ghz (2-QC) 32GB 33 33 0 3 (*) 10
All servers to DL380 G5 3.0Ghz (2-QC) 32GB 33 33 0 3 (*) 10
All servers to BL460c 3.0Ghz (2-QC) 16GB 33 32 1 5 >6
All servers to DL380 G5 3.0Ghz (2-QC) 16GB 33 32 1 5 >6
* NOTE: Add (N+1) BL460c Server for redundancy
![Page 14: Virtualization Assessment Example](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042715/559a86b91a28ab357d8b4705/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14A c c e l e r a t i n g Y o u r S u c c e s s ™ 14
Defining Target Server and Thresholds BL460c 2QC 32GB Servers
![Page 15: Virtualization Assessment Example](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042715/559a86b91a28ab357d8b4705/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15A c c e l e r a t i n g Y o u r S u c c e s s ™ 15
Consolidation Recommendations Server Assignments
![Page 16: Virtualization Assessment Example](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042715/559a86b91a28ab357d8b4705/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16A c c e l e r a t i n g Y o u r S u c c e s s ™ 16
Server Disk Inventory
Path Type Total Size (MB) Total Free (MB) Count
C: NTFS 1,557,806 1,090,814 33
D: FAT32 13,134 9,964 1
D: NTFS 503,876 395,683 9
D: UDF 445 0 1
Totals 2,075,261 1,496,461
Total Used Space 578,800
![Page 17: Virtualization Assessment Example](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042715/559a86b91a28ab357d8b4705/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17A c c e l e r a t i n g Y o u r S u c c e s s ™ 17
All Local and Local Attached Storage = 3TB
Current External Storage CapacityPath Type Total Size (MB) Total Free (MB) Count
E: NTFS 4,990,394 2,830,960 18
F: NTFS 1,647,389 508,033 6
G: NTFS 2,024,914 835,385 8
H: NTFS 2,485,956 150,833 5
I: NTFS 2,919,520 973,370 5
J: NTFS 669,984 254,506 4
K: NTFS 389,984 146,663 4
L: NTFS 558,357 261,729 4
M: NTFS 629,978 378,900 3
N: NTFS 629,978 356,598 3
O: NTFS 757,674 156,897 4
P: NTFS 374,416 321,211 3
Q: NTFS 147,352 128,076 3
R: NTFS 139,424 137,218 2
T: NTFS 230,227 22,027 3
U: NTFS 416,561 255,711 2
V: NTFS 842,232 328,476 3
W: NTFS 139,973 104,840 1
Z: NTFS 476,938 140,368 1
External Storage 20,471,251 8,291,801
![Page 18: Virtualization Assessment Example](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042715/559a86b91a28ab357d8b4705/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18A c c e l e r a t i n g Y o u r S u c c e s s ™ 18
Example C3000, C7000, EVA4400 Rack Placement
C7000 Chassis C3000 ChassisEVA4400
![Page 19: Virtualization Assessment Example](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042715/559a86b91a28ab357d8b4705/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19A c c e l e r a t i n g Y o u r S u c c e s s ™ 19
End of Technical Portion
Questions?
![Page 20: Virtualization Assessment Example](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042715/559a86b91a28ab357d8b4705/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20A c c e l e r a t i n g Y o u r S u c c e s s ™ 20
Financial AssumptionsWindows Server Budget (built from following)
1. System Administration
2. Growth
3. Lifecycle Management / Replacement
4. Maintenance
5. Power and Cooling
![Page 21: Virtualization Assessment Example](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042715/559a86b91a28ab357d8b4705/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21A c c e l e r a t i n g Y o u r S u c c e s s ™ 21
Financial Assumptions (continued)
System Administration Windows Server Budget1. Three (3) Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for Core Windows System
Management (50 servers)
2. 100% utilized for actual server management
3. $75,000 assumed average annual fully burdened cost per FTE
4. Prorated to the actual number of servers modeled for each consolidation scenario
![Page 22: Virtualization Assessment Example](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042715/559a86b91a28ab357d8b4705/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22A c c e l e r a t i n g Y o u r S u c c e s s ™ 22
Financial Assumptions (continued)
Growth and Replacement Budget1. 8% net new physical server annual growth rate
2. 6.3% Lifecycle Management rate (16 years)
a) Average four year expected useful life
b) Using one fourth of servers as candidates for replacements
c) IT actually replaces 25% of the replacement candidates
3. $5,500 average current server cost
a) Hardware only
b) Includes any warranty uplift
c) No OS, middleware, application, etc.
![Page 23: Virtualization Assessment Example](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042715/559a86b91a28ab357d8b4705/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23A c c e l e r a t i n g Y o u r S u c c e s s ™ 23
Financial Assumptions (continued)
Maintenance Budget 1. 24 months average server age calculated from Average
Server CPU MHz (2647)
2. Servers greater than 36 months in age
a. On average calculated to be 24.8% of total
b. Using $0 per server per year
3. Servers less than or equal to 36 months in age
a. On average calculated to be 75.2% of total
b. Using $0 per server per year
![Page 24: Virtualization Assessment Example](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042715/559a86b91a28ab357d8b4705/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24A c c e l e r a t i n g Y o u r S u c c e s s ™ 24
Financial Assumptions (continued)
Power and Cooling Budget Not Assessed to IT Budget – Included in Analysis
1. $0.09 per KWH
2. Use server plate input wattage
$684.11 average per existing server per year (33)
![Page 25: Virtualization Assessment Example](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042715/559a86b91a28ab357d8b4705/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25A c c e l e r a t i n g Y o u r S u c c e s s ™ 25
Financial Assumptions (continued)
Financial Metrics1. Model of Future Servers
a. All growth servers are implemented via virtualization
b. Model accounts for additional VI3 Host Servers for years two and three
2. Recommended environment gear is purchased up front i.e. implementation is completed over the course of first year
3. IT budget assessed using five year straight line method
4. Tax rate 25% and 12% Hurdle Rate
![Page 26: Virtualization Assessment Example](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042715/559a86b91a28ab357d8b4705/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26A c c e l e r a t i n g Y o u r S u c c e s s ™ 26
Breakdown:
Sys Admin Costs: $481,140 (~17 servers : 1 FTE ratio)
Break/Fix Maintenance: $0
IT Assessed Charge: $31,037
Power / Cooling: $73,145
Growth (Capital): $43,560 (~3 servers / year)
Refresh/Replace (Capital): $34,031 (~2 servers / year)
Financial FindingsThree Year TCO Baseline Summary – 33 Servers
Current TCO = $585,322
![Page 27: Virtualization Assessment Example](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042715/559a86b91a28ab357d8b4705/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27A c c e l e r a t i n g Y o u r S u c c e s s ™ 27
Financial Findings (continued)
Three Year Payback Summary – 33 Servers
ScenarioHW/SW Cost1
3 Year TCO2
IT Budget Reduction
Payback (months)
ROI (IRR%)
BL460c 2-QC 32GB4 New ESX Hosts3000 ChassisEVA4400 22TB Storage
$222,327 $527,291 $58,031 31.2 8.3
BL460c 2-QC 32GB4 New ESX Hosts7000 ChassisEVA4400 22TB Storage
$225,559 $529,230 $56,092 31.5 7.7
DL380G5 2-QC 32GB4 New ESX HostsEVA4400 22TB Storage
$204,955 $525,733 $59,589 30.3 10.2
2Includes estimated implementation budget, $33,000
1Includes budgetary pricing for server, software, support and storage capacity ($130,636),
Current TCO = $585,322
![Page 28: Virtualization Assessment Example](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042715/559a86b91a28ab357d8b4705/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28A c c e l e r a t i n g Y o u r S u c c e s s ™ 28
Breakdown:
Sys Admin Costs: $379,421
Break/Fix Maintenance: $0
IT Assessed Charge: $133,396
Power / Cooling: $14,474
Growth (Capital): $0 (0 Yr 2; 0 Yr 3)
Refresh/Replace (Capital): $0
Financial Findings (continued)
Three Year TCO Proposed Summary – BL460 2-QC 32GB
Proposed TCO = $527,291
![Page 29: Virtualization Assessment Example](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042715/559a86b91a28ab357d8b4705/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29A c c e l e r a t i n g Y o u r S u c c e s s ™ 29
Breakdown:
Today:
33 Existing Servers: $73,145
Proposed:
4 BL460 32GB $14,474
Financial Findings (continued)
Three Year Power and Cooling Summary
![Page 30: Virtualization Assessment Example](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042715/559a86b91a28ab357d8b4705/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30A c c e l e r a t i n g Y o u r S u c c e s s ™ 30
Breakdown:
Sys Admin Costs: $379,421
Break/Fix Maintenance: $0
Power / Cooling: $0
IT Assessed Charge: $133,396
Growth (Capital): $0 (0 Yr. 2: 0 Yr. 3)
Refresh/Replace (Capital): $0
Financial Findings (continued)
Three Year TCO Proposed Summary – BL460 2-QC 32GB
Current TCO = $512,817
Payback increases from 31.2 monthsto 38.6 months
![Page 31: Virtualization Assessment Example](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042715/559a86b91a28ab357d8b4705/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31A c c e l e r a t i n g Y o u r S u c c e s s ™ 31
Thank you for your time!
Questions?
![Page 32: Virtualization Assessment Example](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042715/559a86b91a28ab357d8b4705/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32A c c e l e r a t i n g Y o u r S u c c e s s ™ 32
Server Administration Tasks (for reference only)
1. Deploying servers, 2. Software installation and configuration, 3. Physical installation (conventional server), 4. Proactive upgrading servers (patches/service packs/applications), 5. Monitoring, 6. Backup/Recovery, 7. Labor hours for unplanned downtime, 8. Problem resolution, 9. User Support, 10.Training, Security, 11.HW Procurement/Inventory, and 12.Miscellaneous (e-mail, staff meetings/reporting, etc.)