Virtual Vehicle Development Requirements for Safety CAE · Virtual Vehicle Development Requirements...
Transcript of Virtual Vehicle Development Requirements for Safety CAE · Virtual Vehicle Development Requirements...
1
Virtual Vehicle DevelopmentRequirements for Safety CAE
Michael BuckleySafety CAE Technical SpecialistPaul WoodWarwick Manufacturing Group
Autosim, Birmingham April 2008
Agenda
• JLR Body & Trim CAE Group Background
• CAE Challenges for Virtual Vehicle Delivery
• Case Study: Modelling of Self Piercing Rivets
• Summary
JLR Body & Trim CAE
• Team of around 80 engineers in Body & Trim Engineering.
• Attributes Supported
> BIW & Component NVH (BIW, Seating, Interior Trim, IP etc.)
> BIW & Component Durability
> BIW, Component & Full Vehicle Safety
> Closures
2
Challenges of Delivering Robust Data
CAE Challenges
• Full Virtual Test Programs
• No Surprises at Test!
> CAE is reliably capable of predicting error states
• More Demanding Targets
> (e.g. EuroNCAP, IIHS) requiring increased CAE fidelity &
capability.
• Compressed Program Timelines
> Speed/ accuracy balance
Increase Predictive Capability with Limited Resource
Mesh to CAD Variation
Shape
Heat Treatment
Gauge Variation
Residual Stress Pre Strain Damage
Part Production
Manufacturing Artifacts
Supplier Specific
Average of all Suppliers
Base
Mechanical Properties
Material
Body PanelExtrusionCasting
Adhesive
SPR
Bolts
RSW
Joints
BIW
Incr
easi
ng C
AE
Mod
el C
ompl
exity
& P
redi
ctiv
e C
apab
ility
Where do we get best S/N
improvements?
How accurate do we need to
be?
Example: SPR Joint Modelling
• Around 4000 mechanical joints on a vehicle (spotwelds, self piercing
rivets, bolts, etc.).
• All joints cost time & money, some cost weight.
• Unpredicted panel failure can lead to reduced vehicle performance.
• In order to optimise joints we need to be able to predict their behaviours
in terms of stiffness & failure (load, toughness etc.) characteristics.
• Challenges
> Acquisition of appropriate test data
> Implementation in CAE.
5mm
Physical Entities
SPR
CAE Entities
Beam or Spring
Solid Element
5mm
RSW
Joints Background & CAEImplementation Issues
3
Lap Shear U tension Peel tension
Explore Test Systems Using CAE
• Protocol Design
• Test & Measeurement System Design
• System Prove Out
High Speed Test Facility
• 1mm/s -> 1m/s (closed loop)
• 1m/s -> 20m/s (open loop)
• Rated at 100kN
• Bi-directional
• Gauge Lengths:
• 50mm (Quasi)
• 25mm (High Speed)
Typical Test Results: SPR in ‘U’ Tension
Effect of Speed
4
�Initial model stiffness too low�Probable causes? – diameter of SPR and effect of bolt constraint on side of specimen in model.
Initial CAE Model
0.3
mm
1.5
mm
0.3
mm
Rivet Side Clamp Side
Bulge on top face 9 mm dia
1.3 mm9 mm dia
5.9
mm
dia
3.7
mm
2.1
mm
4.8 mm dia
Investigate Test Results & Samples
Part Number and Definition1) Rivet Side: Moving Rigid given Constant Velocity BC in X (~ Grip Movement) 2) Clamp Side: Deformable Central Body3) Clamp Side: Deformable Corner of body4) Clamp Side: Rigid Sides Fully Constrained5) Rivet Side: Rigid SPR Constrained to Part 16) Clamp Side: Deformable Sleeve7) Clamp Side: Deformable Button
Contact Definition Between Parts 1, 5 (Slave Side) and Parts 2, 6 (Master Slide) using Contact Automatic Surface to Surface with part definition and friction initially set to 0.3
1
2
3 4
�Solid element size in deformable parts ~ 0.5mm fully integrated (type 3)�Shell element size in rigid SPR ~ 0.25 mm
5
6
7Rivet side
Clamp side
Detail Model to Understand Mechanisms
Deformed shape corresponds to test specimen geometry
Section View
End View Side View
Section ViewSection View
End View Side View
Section View
Moving Rigid ~ Grip
Deformable
Detailed CAE vs Test
5
End of test specimen displacement (K1)
End of rivet pull out (K2)
Improved CAE Correlation in Detailed Model
Force Output from Physics Model
Detailed Model 8 mm Spring PCDk2 Scaled
Sub-model1 x 6dof beamk2 scaled
Industrial Level CAE Model
Summary
• The competative automotive environment will continue to challenge CAE, asking new questions & wanting the answers faster
• New predictive capabilities require significant investment• CAE must be used at all stages of new virtual technology delivery• At JLR, CAE is enabling the goal of the fully virtual program.
CAE, a Key Contributer to , ‘Better Cars, Faster’
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge the financial contribution of
Advantage West Midlands to this project.
Questions?