Viorel POP Babeş-Bolyai University, Faculty of Physics...
Transcript of Viorel POP Babeş-Bolyai University, Faculty of Physics...
Viorel POP
Babeş-Bolyai University, Faculty of Physics,
400084 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Recent development of rare earth lean
permanent magnets
The Scientific research has been conducted by the group of magnetism at UBB
in collaboration with the following teams:
Olivier Isnard
Institut Néel , CNRS, Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France
Ionel Chicinas
Materials Science and Technology Dept., Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Jean Marie Le Breton
Groupe de Physique des Matériaux, Université de Rouen, Saint Etienne Du Rouvray, France
Mihaela Văleanu
National Institute of Material Physics, P.O. Box MG-7, R-76900 Magurele, Bucharest, Romania
With the financial supported of
Romanian Ministry of Education and Research, grant PN-II-ID-PCE-2012-4-0470
Outline
• Introduction
• MnBi magnetic phase
• MnAl magnetic phase
• Nanocomposites magnets=Spring magnets
• Conclusions
Outline
• Introduction
• MnBi magnetic phase
• MnAl magnetic phase
• Nanocomposites magnets=Spring magnets
• Conclusions
magnetic materials are critical components in many
devices and for advanced technologies.
magnetic materials are critical components in many
devices and for advanced technologies.
high performance magnet (HPM)/wind generator 1000-
1600 kg/MW.
motors and generators: 2 kg HPM/hybrid electric vehicle-
20 million vehicles by 2018.
Magnetocaloric applications 4 kg HPM/kW cooling power.
HPM= rare-earth based magnets
China manages about 96 % of
rare-earth resources in 2011!!!
magnetic materials are critical components in many
devices and for advanced technologies.
high performance magnet (HPM)/wind generator 1000-
1600 kg/MW.
motors and generators: 2 kg HPM/hybrid electric vehicle-
20 million vehicles by 2018.
Magnetocaloric applications 4 kg HPM/kW cooling power.
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2010/7/2 2011/7/2 2012/7/2 2013/7/2
Pri
ce
RM
B/k
g
PrNd alloy
July,2011
1599RMB/kg
July,2013
357.5RMB/kg
July,2010
240.5RMB/kg
The price of PrNd alloy have increased about 565% form November 2010 to July 2011. In July 2013, it drop to 22.4% compare with top price.
REE price fluctuations
Instability of RE market, ex. Nd: 150 $/kg/2013; 450 $/kg/2011, 15 $/kg/2009
0746491981
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
2010/7/2 2011/7/2 2012/7/2 2013/7/2
Pri
ce
R
MB
/kg
DyFe alloy
July,2011
14292RMB/kg
July,2013
1495RMB/kgJuly,2010
1340RMB/kg
The price of DyFe alloy have increased about 967% form July 2010 to July 2011. In July 2013, it drop to 10.46% compare with top price.
Kaihong Ding - Yantai Shougang Magnetic Materials, China, Energy and Materials Criticality Workshop, Santorini 2013
REE price fluctuations
Solutions ?
1. The increase of usage efficiency.
2. Recycling.
Solutions ?
Yes, we are obliged to have solutions !
1. The increase of usage efficiency.
2. Recycling.
3. New magnetic phases without rare-earth with high magnetic properties for
applications as permanent magnets and magnetic refrigeration.: Fe-Co si Fe-
Ni tetragonal, Fe-Co ternary or quaternary, Fe16N2, MnBi, MnAl, Mn3Ga,
Heusler alloys
4. Soft/hard nanocomposite magnets Spring magnets
Solutions ?
Yes, we are obliged to have solutions !
Rare Earth-Free Permanent Magnets ?
RE-free hard magnetic compounds exist: FePt, CoPt, MnBi, MnAl, Zr2Co11, ε-Fe2O3
Even the Alnico-type magnets still have a room for improvement; their theoretical
(BH)max is 36-49 MGOe and they have excellent temperature stability; Artificial Alnicos!
Compound Structure Saturation magnetization
Curie temperature (oC)
Anisotropy constant K1
(MJ/m3)
(BH)m
(MGOe)
Co hexagonal 17.6 kG 1115 0.53
FePt tetragonal 14.3 kG 477 6.6
CoPt tetragonal 10.0 kG 567 4.9
Co3Pt hexagonal 13.8 kG 727 2.0
MnAl tetragonal 6.2 kG 377 1.7 9.6
MnBi hexagonal 7.8 kG 357 1.2 16-17
BaFe12O19 hexagonal 4.8 kG 450 0.33 3-4
Zr2Co11 orthorhombic(?) ≈70 emu/g 500 ? (HA = 34 kOe) 14
ε-Fe2O3 orthorhombic ≈16 emu/g ? ? (Hc = 23.4 kOe)
Alnico Cubic (shape) 12-14 8-11(36)
SmCo5 hexagonal 11.4 kG 681 17.0 25-30
Nd2Fe14B tetragonal 16.0 kG 312 5.0 30-57
G. Hadjipanayis, Delaware University, Energy and Materials Criticality Workshop, Santorini 2013
1. The increase of usage efficiency.
2. Recycling.
3. New magnetic phases without rare-earth with high magnetic properties for
applications as permanent magnets and magnetic refrigeration.: Fe-Co si Fe-
Ni tetragonal, Fe-Co ternary or quaternary, Fe16N2, MnBi, MnAl, Mn3Ga,
Heusler alloys
4. Soft/hard nanocomposite magnets Spring magnets
Solutions ?
Yes, we are obliged to have solutions !
3. New magnetic phases without rare-earth with high magnetic properties for
applications as permanent magnets and magnetic refrigeration.: Fe-Co si Fe-
Ni tetragonal, Fe-Co ternary or quaternary, Fe16N2, MnBi, MnAl, Mn3Ga,
Heusler alloys
4. Soft/hard nanocomposite magnets Spring magnets
1. New magnetic phases without rare-earth with high magnetic properties
2. Soft/hard nanocomposite magnets Spring magnets
Our recent research in these directions
1. New magnetic phases without rare-earth with high magnetic properties
MnBi
MnAl
• Mn50+δAl50-δ; δ=4
• Mn50Al50-δXδ; δ=4, X=Ni, Zn, Ti
2. Soft/hard nanocomposite magnets Spring magnets
hard magnetic phases of SmCo5, SmCo3Cu2, R2Fe14B
soft magnetic phases of -Fe, Fe-Co (~20 or 10 wt%)
Our recent research in these directions
1. New magnetic phases without rare-earth with high magnetic properties
MnBi
MnAl
• Mn50+δAl50-δ; δ=4
• Mn50Al50-δXδ; δ=4, X=Ni, Zn, Ti
2. Soft/hard nanocomposite magnets Spring magnets
hard magnetic phases of SmCo5, SmCo3Cu2, R2Fe14B
• SmCo5 large anisotropy
• SmCo3Cu2 large coercivity
• R2Fe14B best magnets
soft magnetic phases of -Fe, Fe-Co (~20 or 10 wt%)
Our recent research in these directions
Outline
• Introduction
• MnBi magnetic phase
• AlMn magnetic phase
• Nanocomposites magnets=Spring magnets
• Conclusions
Low temperature phase (LTP)-NiAs type Hexagonal (Ferromagnetic) High temperature phase (HTP) -Distorted Ni2In type hexagonal (paramagnetic)
MnBi magnetic phase
Low temperature phase (LTP)-NiAs type Hexagonal (Ferromagnetic) High temperature phase (HTP) -Distorted Ni2In type hexagonal (paramagnetic)
Quenched high temperature phase (QHTP)-Orthorhombic (Ferromagnetic-low Ms)
MnBi magnetic phase
Some previous works in MnBi magnetic compound*Powders: Sintered method & magnetic separation
J B Yang et al. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14 (2002) 6509
Nanocrystalline MnBi by melt-spinning technique
(BH)max = 7.1 MGOe(powders of melt-
spun ribbons)
(BH)max=7.7 MGOe(powders)
Yang et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 082505 (2011)
Adams et al. J. Appl. Phys. 23 1207 (1952)
(BH)max=4.3 MGOe
Hot pressed bulk magnet Spark plasma sintered bulk magnet
Density: 90%
(BH)max< 2 MGOe
Density: 93%
Zhang et al. J. Appl. Phys 109, 07A722 (2011)
*G. Hadjipanayis, Delaware University, Energy and Materials Criticality Workshop, Santorini 2013
Magnetic properties of MnBi/Sm2Fe17Nx nanocomposite powders
MnBi powders: Hc of 12.4 kOe with Mr of 55 emu/g
Sm2Fe17Nx powders: Hc of 7 kOe with Mr of 130
Hybrid magnet powders exhibit
• Hc and Mr values intermediate to those of pure
MnBi and Sm2Fe17Nx
• anisotropic magnetic characteristics with Mr/Ms ratio
greater than 0.91
G. Hadjipanayis, Delaware University, Energy and Materials Criticality Workshop, Santorini 2013
Synthesis:
melting : Mn and Bi of 99,99% purity (1 wt % Mn in excess)
annealing : 258-420ºC/ from 2 hours to 4 days
mechanical milling: of bulk MnBi phase for 2 hours
X-rays powder diffraction:
Kα radiation of copper in the angular range 2θ = 20 - 100 and
Kα1 radiation of cobalt in angular range 2θ= 20 - 80º
Magnetic measurements:
extraction method in a continuous magnetic field of up to± 10 T
Our main results
MnBi
MnBi: influence of annealing
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
MnBi Ta = 420°C/4days
MnBi Ta = 400°C/24h
MnBi Ta = 400°C/2h
MnBi Ta = 300°C/2h
Inte
nsity (
arb
units)
2 θ angle (deg)
MnBi_melt
MnBi Ta = 258°C/24h
Bi
MnBi
Bi
MnBi Ta=420 °C/4days
MnBi Ta=400 °C/24 h
MnBi Ta=400 °C/2 h
MnBi Ta=300 °C/2 h
MnBi Ta=258 °C/24 h
MnBi_as melted
MnBi: influence of annealing; XRD Cu Kα radiation
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
MnBi Ta = 420°C/4days
MnBi Ta = 400°C/24h
MnBi Ta = 400°C/2h
MnBi Ta = 300°C/2h
Inte
nsity (
arb
units)
2 θ angle (deg)
MnBi_melt
MnBi Ta = 258°C/24h
Bi
MnBi
Bi
MnBi Ta=420 °C/4days
MnBi Ta=400 °C/24 h
MnBi Ta=400 °C/2 h
MnBi Ta=300 °C/2 h
MnBi Ta=258 °C/24 h
MnBi_as melted
MnBi Ta=300 °C/2 h
+ 2h MM Ta=300 °C/30 min.
+ 2h MM Ta=350 °C/30 min.
+ 2h MM Ta=400 °C/30 min.
MnBi: influence of annealing; XRD Cu Kα radiation MnBi: influence of milling; XRD Co Kα radiation
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
MnBi Ta=400°C/2h-4K
MnBi Ta=400°C/2h-100K
MnBi Ta=400°C/2h-200K
MnBi Ta=400°C/2h-300K
MnBi Ta=400°C/2h-350K
MnBi Ta=400°C/2h-400K
MnBi Ta=400°C/2h-450K
M
(A
m2/k
g)
H (T)
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
M (
Am
2/k
g)
H (T)
MnBi 2hMM Ta=300°C/30min-4K
MnBi 2hMM Ta=300°C/30min-100K
MnBi 2hMM Ta=300°C/30min-200K
MnBi 2hMM Ta=300°C/30min-300K
MnBi 2hMM Ta=300°C/30min-350K
MnBi 2hMM Ta=300°C/30min-400K
MnBi 2hMM Ta=300°C/30min-450K
M(H) for different T,
MnBi melted samples, annealed at 400ºC for 2 h
Hysteresis loops for different T,
MnBi 2h MM+TT 300 ºC/30 min
Important coercivity at high temperature,
competition with REPM
Outline
• Introduction
• MnBi magnetic phase
• MnAl magnetic phase
• Nanocomposites magnets=Spring magnets
• Conclusions
Mn-Al magnetic phase
ε phase –antiferromagnetic hexagonal structure
τ phase –L10- ferromagnetic tetragonal structure
Mn-Al magnetic phase
ε phase –antiferromagnetic hexagonal structure
τ phase –L10- ferromagnetic tetragonal structure
ε' phase –Intermediate ferromagnetic ordered
orthorhombic phase
Mn54Al46- the best results
Mn-Al magnetic phase
• Phase transformation proposed by Broek et. al. with intermediate ordered orthorhombic phase (B19) denoted by ε'.
• Acta Metall.,27(1979) 1497
*Q. Zeng, I. Baker, J.B. Cui, Z.C. Yan, JMMM, 308 (2007) 214–226
Phase formation, microstructure, magnetic properties of the Mn–Al–C; bulk or MM*
τ-phase nucleates almost exclusively at
the ε-phase grain boundaries
*Q. Zeng, I. Baker, J.B. Cui, Z.C. Yan, JMMM, 308 (2007) 214–226
Phase formation, microstructure, magnetic properties of the Mn–Al–C; bulk or MM*
DSC: the transformation ε(ε’) τ phase,
τ –phase stabilized by C doping,
C doping cannot prevent the formation
of the equilibrium phases from the
metastable ε -phase during annealing.
*Q. Zeng, I. Baker, J.B. Cui, Z.C. Yan, JMMM, 308 (2007) 214–226
Phase formation, microstructure, magnetic properties of the Mn–Al–C; bulk or MM*
The optimal magnetic properties for the MM samples, Hc=4.8 kOe, Mr=45 emu/g and Ms= 89 emu/g,
were obtained for Mn54Al46 annealed at 400°C for 10 min
DSC: the transformation ε(ε’) τ phase,
τ –phase stabilized by C doping,
C doping cannot prevent the formation
of the equilibrium phases from the
metastable ε -phase during annealing.
ε'-phase τ-phase.
Mn
Al
1a
Sites
1b
ε'-phase τ-phase.
τ- MnAl
(a)the total
density of states
(b) the 3d partial
density of states of
Mn at the 1a site
(c) the 3d partial
density of states of
Mn at the 1b site of
the P4/mmm unit
cell
K. Anand et al. / Journal of
Alloys and Compounds 601
(2014) 234–237
Mn
Al
1a
Sites
1b
ε'-phase τ-phase.
τ- MnAl
stoichiometric MnAl (red curves)
Mn50+δAl50-δ; δ=4 (blue curves) .
- Ingots were prepared by arc or induction melting
- Different heat treatment to stabilize the desired magnetic phase
Measurements
- Differential thermal analysis (DTA)
- XRD on Brüker D8 Advance diffractometer
- Thermomagnetic measurements up to 800 K
Our resultsMn50Al46Ni4 and Mn54Al46
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
DT
A (µ
V)
T (oC)
TC
e' TC
tt e + g
As-cast induction melted
t
Al2Mn
3
Fig. 1. DTA curve for the as-cast Mn50Al46Ni4 alloy.
DTA_Mn50Al46Ni4 and Mn54Al46
XRD_Mn50Al46Ni4 and Mn54Al46 Mn50Al46Ni4
Thermomagnetic studies
Mn50Al46Ni4 and Mn54Al46
50
100
150
200
250
300
650 700 750 800
as-cast
TT 470oC 5 h
c-
1(m
ol/e
mu
)
T (K)
Paramagnetic behavior
Mn50Al46Ni4 and Mn54Al46
S1 P42
Outline
• Introduction
• MnBi magnetic phase
• MnAl magnetic phase
• Nanocomposites magnets=Spring magnets
• Conclusions
a magnetit magnet (1750)
A ferrite magnet (1940)
rare earth based magnet (1980)
All this magnets have the same energy !
10 cm
exchange-spring magnets
(20??)
K
A
~ 4 – 100 nm
20
2
s
scsc
M
Al
lsc~ 3 – 7 nmμ0Hsc ~ 1000 T
Nanophased materials behave differently from their macroscopic counterparts
because their characteristic sizes are smaller than the characteristic length
scales of physical phenomena occurring in bulk materials.
Exchange interactions
First
neighbours
Magnetocrystalline anisotropy
Energy dependent of
Dipolar interaction
(demagnetised field)
Magnetic configuration
in magnetic nanostructures:
domains, walls, vortex, confi
guration magnetic
anisotropy, etc
Fe : ~ 30 nm
Nd2Fe14B : ~ 5 nm
E. De Lacheisserie (edit.), Magnetisme, Presses Universitaires de Grenoble, 1999.
Kronmuller & Coey Magnetic Materials, in European White book
on Fundamentel Research in Materials Science
Max Planck Inst. Metallforschung,Stuttgart, 2001, 92-96
(BH)max = 1090 kJ/m3 for
nanostructured multilayers
Sm2Fe17N3/Fe65Co35
R. Skomski, J. Appl. Phys. 76 (1994) 7059
Theoretical predictions:
Experimental realisations: ??????????
Best magnets on the market:
(BH)max 500 kJ/m3
high
anisotropy
large
magnetization
+
hard phase
exchange
soft phase
Exchange spring magnets
Structure
MicrostructureSoft-hard exchange hardness
hcrD 2
high
anisotropy
large
magnetization
+
hard phase
exchange
soft phase
Exchange spring magnets
hhh KA / Dcr = soft phase critical dimension
h = width of domain wall in the hard phase
Ah and Kh are the exchange and anisotropy constants
20 40 60 80 100
200
400
600
800
1000
0
Fraction of -Fe [%]
(BH
) max
6.4 nm 12.8 nm 25.6 nm 38.4 nm 51.2 nm 64.0 nm
Nd2Fe14B
Fukunaga predicted a drastic increase in (BH)max of SmCo5/-Fe as a function of
-Fe fraction. The Dresden Group (Neu et al) obtained similar results in
SmCo5/Fe multilayers (Intermag 2012). Very recently Hono’s Group
fabricated Fe/Nd-Fe-B multilayers with (BH)m=61 MGOe (Advanced
Materials, 2012).
FukunagaTrilateral Workshop on Critical
Materials, Tokyo, March 2012
SmCo5/-Fe Core-Shell Nanocomposite Magnets
3 layers
5 layers
IEEE TRANS. MAGN., 48 (2012) 3599,
V. Neu , S. Sawatzki , M.Kopte , Ch. Mickel , and L. Schultz
460 kJ/m3
Volker Neu, Energy and Materials Criticality
Workshop, Santorini 2013
* Liyun Zheng, Baozhi Cui, George C. Hadjipanayis, Acta Materialia 59 (2011) 6772–6782
Effect of different surfactants on the formation and morphology of SmCo5 nanoflakes*
oleylamine (OY),
trioctylamine (TOA)
oleic acid (OA),
* Liyun Zheng, Baozhi Cui, George C. Hadjipanayis, Acta Materialia 59 (2011) 6772–6782
Effect of different surfactants on the formation and morphology of SmCo5 nanoflakes*
oleylamine (OY),
trioctylamine (TOA)
oleic acid (OA),
micro-size powders became flakes.
* Liyun Zheng, Baozhi Cui, George C. Hadjipanayis, Acta Materialia 59 (2011) 6772–6782
Effect of different surfactants on the formation and morphology of SmCo5 nanoflakes*
oleylamine (OY),
trioctylamine (TOA)
oleic acid (OA),
•hard magnetic phases of SmCo5, SmCo3Cu2, R2Fe14B
•soft magnetic phases of -Fe, Fe-Co (~20 or 10 wt%)
Our researches
SmCo5 large anisotropy
SmCo3Cu2 large coercivity
R2Fe14B best magnets
•hard magnetic phases of SmCo5, SmCo3Cu2, R2Fe14B
•soft magnetic phases of -Fe, Fe-Co (~20 or 10 wt%)
Our researches
(SmCo5, SmCo3Cu2, R2Fe14B)+x% (-Fe or Fe65Co35
• composition, x= 10 or 22 wt % Fe
• milling time
• conventional annealing/short time annealing
Magnetic Hard/Soft nanocomposites – Spring magnets
SmCo5 large anisotropy
SmCo3Cu2 large coercivity
R2Fe14B best magnets
•milling of the powders in a high energy planetary mill
•heat treatments (temperatures and duration)
Material
preparation
Starting materials :• hard magnetic phases
ingots – prepared by melting
• Fe NC 100.24 powder (Höganäs), (< 40 μm) and
• Fe65Co35 obtained by melting
Mechanical milling experiments:• premilling of hard and soft magnetic ingots
• hard magnetic + -Fe (or Fe65Co35) mixed powders – milled in Ar for 1.5 – 12 h
Annealing: • conventional annealing: in vacuum/450-650 °C for 0.5 up to 10 h.
• short time annealing: in argon/700, 750 or 800 °C for 0.5 to 3 min.
Fritsch Pulverisette 4
•X-rays diffraction (XRD)
•DSC measurements
•Electron microscopy (SEM and TEM)
morphology
chemical composition checked by EDX
•Magnetic measurements
Material
characterisation
cooling
heatingNd2Fe14B – 6hMM
release
internal stress
Nd2Fe14B
Fe/Fe3B
cooling
heatingNd2Fe14B – 6hMM
release
internal stress
Nd2Fe14B
Fe/Fe3B
S. Gutoiu, V. Pop et al., J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. 12 (2010) 2126-2131
Classical annealing Short time annealing
R. Larde, J-M. Le Breton, A. Maître, D. Ledue, O. Isnard, V. Pop
and I. Chicinaş, J. Phys. Chem., 117 (2013) 7801
Atomic-Scale Investigation
high
anisotropy
large
magnetization
+
hard phase
exchange
soft phase
Exchange spring magnets
M
H
Hard-soft
exchange coupled
Hard - soft
uncoupled
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
-0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2
Nd2Fe
14B+10%Fe
8hMM
8h MM
8h MM+550oC/1.5h
8h MM+750oC/1.0min
8h MM+750oC/1.5min
8h MM+750oC/2.0min
M(A
m2/k
g)
0H (T)
-200
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
-10 -5 0 5 10
M(A
m2/k
g)
0H (T)
Classical annealing Short time annealing
Nd2Fe14B + 10 % α-Fe; 8h MM
Hc- evident increasing
Mr- small decreasing
0
100
200
300
400
500
-3 -2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
(Nd0.92
Dy0.08
)2Fe
14B+22 wt% Fe
milled for 6h
T = 300K
6h MM
6h MM+450 oC/1.5h
6h MM+550 oC/1.5h
6h MM+600 oC/1.5h
6h MM+650 oC/1.5h
6h MM+800 oC/5min
dM
/dH
µoH (T)
The influence of the type of hard magnetic phase
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
-3 -2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1
SmCo5+20 wt% Fe_
8hMM
8hMM+450oC/0.5h
8hMM+500oC/1.5h
8hMM+550oC/1.5h
8hMM+600oC/0.5h
8hMM+650oC/0.5h
dM
/dH
(A
m2/k
gT
)
0H (T)
R2Fe14B/Fe
Lower coercivity
Two peaks,
pour hard/soft magnetic coupling
SmCo5/Fe
Higher coercivity
One peak,
good hard/soft magnetic coupling
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
-8 -4 0 4 8
SmCo3Cu
2+30 wt% Fe
T = 300K
1.5h MM3h MM5h MM
7h MM9h MM
M (
emu
/g)
H (T)
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
-8 -4 0 4 8
SmCo3Cu
2+30 wt% Fe
T = 300K
SmCo3Cu
2 2h MM
3h MM
3h MM+450C/0.5h
7h MM
7h MM+450C/0.5h
M (
emu/g
)
0H (T)
the importance of the
intrinsic anisotropy*
This behavior was connected with coercivity mechanism of the
SmCo3Cu2 phase given by the microstructure [1-2] and diminishing
of the intrinsic coercivity by Co substitution with Cu [3].
[1] E. Estevez-Rams, J. Fidler, A. Penton, J.C. Tellez-Blanco, R.S. Turtelli, R. Grossinger, J. Alloys
Compounds, 283 (1999) 327.
[2] P. Kerschl, A. Handstein, K. Khlopkov, O. Gutfleisch, D. Eckert, K. Nenkov, J.-C. Te´ llez-
Blanco, R. Gro¨ ssinger, K.-H. Mu¨ ller, L. Schultz, J. Magn. Magn. Matter. 290–291 (2005) 420.
[3] E. Lectard, C.H. Allibert, R. Ballou, J. Appl. Phys. 75 (1994) 6277. SmCo5 SmCu5
*D. Givord, O. Isnard,, V. Pop, I. Chicinas, JMMM 316 (2007)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1
SmCo5+x wt% Fe_6 h MM
T = 300 K
30 %Fe as milled
30 %Fe 550 oC/0.5h
30 %Fe600 oC/0.5h
30 %Fe 650 oC/0.5h
20 %Fe as milled
20 %Fe 450 oC/0.5h
20 %Fe 550 oC/1.5h
20 %Fe 600 oC/0.5hd
M/d
H (
Am
2/k
gT
)
µoH (T)
The influence of the hard/soft ratio
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
-6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6
SmCo5+x%Fe
T = 300 K
6h/550oC-1.5h_20%Fe
6h/550oC-1.5h_30%Fe
8h/550oC-1.5h_20%Fe
8h550oC-1.5h_30%Fe
2hMM_SmCo5
M (
Am
2/k
g)
µ0H (T)
SmCo5+x% Fe (x=20 or 30),
milled 6 and 8 h and annealed at 550°C for 1.5 h*
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Nd2Fe
14B+10%Fe
8hMM
700 oC
750 oC
800 oC
0H
c (T
)
annealing time (min)
Nd2Fe14B + 10 % α-Fe; 8h MM
Nd2Fe14B + 22 % α-Fe; 8h MM
*V. Pop, O. Isnard, D. Givord, I. Chicinas, JMMM 310 (2007) 2489
V. Pop, O. Isnard, D. Givord, I. Chicinas, J. M. Le Breton, JOAM 8 (2006) 494V. Pop et al., J. Alloys Compd. (2011)
V. Pop et al. , J. Alloys Compd. 581 (2013) 821–827
S1 P41
Conclusions
MnBi LTP: large coercivity at high temperature a good candidate for performance spring magnets
MnAl: stabilisation of τ with conservation of Mn moments
The structure and microstructure strong impact on hard/soft exchange hardness.
Intrinsic anisotropy the strength of the interphase exchange coupling
Annealing linked to the recrystallisation temperature of soft phases and hard magnetic phases;
recover the crystallinity of the hard phase and hinder the increase of Fe crystallites.
For higher α-Fe concentration the magnetic properties are pourer because non correlation with Fe
size crystallites.
The short time annealing is more appropriate for higher coercivity of the nanocomposites.
Thank you for your attention
This contribution was supported by the
Romanian Ministry of Education and Research, grant PN-II-ID-PCE-2012-4-0470