Proposed district plan further submission (lds church) 1 july version (1)
Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
-
Upload
dave-elloway -
Category
Documents
-
view
223 -
download
0
Transcript of Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
1/100
1
Chapter 1 - Introduction
Background
This project examined the City of Guelph and the potential integration of existing
and future neighbourhood groups into the Citys emergency management program.
Neighbourhood groups and associations exist to improve the quality of life in their
communities (Logan & Rabrenovic, 1990) and this is key in the mission statement of the
neighbourhood groups in Guelph (City of Guelph). These are people who are already
engaged in their community, and have a commitment to assist others. With that desire to
help and be involved in place comes the ability to influence the decisions and actions of
those in command (Pearce, 2002) through influence and contact. This project seeks to
find ways to utilize this engaged group of citizens in enhancing the City of Guelphs
emergency management program in ways that will be accepted and supported by
neighbourhood groups and municipal decision makers. Without an aligning of goals
between the population and emergency management decision makers, there is a potential
for assistance to be offered but not accepted.
Purpose of the Research
This research was conducted to determine knowledge of emergency management
within the existing neighbourhood groups established in the City of Guelph. This requires
an assessment of current emergency management knowledge within the executive and
other members of neighbourhood groups, and a measure of the satisfaction of past
emergency management communication between the City of Guelph and neighbourhood
groups. This research made an assumption that both neighbourhood groups, and the
emergency operations control group and senior managers of the City of Guelph would
see benefit in working together to improve the community, and that there is a willingness
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
2/100
2
to be involved by neighbourhood groups and the City of Guelph in that communication
process.
This project sought to answer the following question about the neighbourhood
groups and their interaction with the City of Guelph during an emergency: What role do
neighborhood groups play in preparing residents to understand their roles and
responsibilities for self-preservation and recovery in the City of Guelph prior to, during,
and after an emergency? More specifically, this research examined the following:
1. Does the City of Guelph communicate with our neighborhood groups toensure that residents understand their roles?
2. Is communication effective between the City of Guelph and neighborhoodgroups?
3. How does the City of Guelph ensure an understanding of local emergencyplans and methods exists within our neighborhood groups?
4. How does the City of Guelph include the need to self organize a response at aneighborhood level within the municipal plans?
5. Do repeated warnings prior to an event de-sensitize neighborhood groups todanger, thereby reducing the seriousness of their required response?
Definitions
During this paper, the following definitions will assist the reader in understanding
the terms and functions referred to.
Communications The process of disseminating useable information to other
persons who receive and understand the message (Merriam-
webster.com)
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
3/100
3
Community Emergency Management Coordinator (CEMC) A qualified emergency
manager responsible for administration of an emergency plan.
An emergency management practitioner. (Guelph.ca)
Emergency Management The managerial function charged with creating the framework
within which communities reduce vulnerability to hazards and
cope with disaster (International Association of Emegency
Managers)
Emergency Management Ontario A provincial agency that is tasked with emergency
management coordination functions for municipalities and
provincial agencies. Known by its acronym EMO.
Emergency Operations Centre (EOC) A place of operations equipped with
communications systems that facilitate command and control
over resources during a time of crisis or potential crisis.
Emergency Operations Control Group (EOCG) A group of individuals who are senior
staff for the City of Guelph, and are designated by by-law to
issue instructions and give direction in a time of
emergency.(Guelph.ca)
Exercise An opportunity to test local emergency preparations and plans.
Fan out list A list maintained by an organization with contact information
to allow the quick dissemination of information through the
organization. (thefreedictionary.com)
Mitigation - The process of taking action to prevent or reduce emergency or
disaster situation effects.- to make less severe or painful
(merriam-webster.com)
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
4/100
4
Neighbourhood Group A civic organization oriented toward maintaining or improving
the quality of life in a geographically delimited residential area
(Logan & Rabrenovic, 1990).
Neighbourhood Group Executive Members of a neighbourhood group who have
organizational or leadership functioning within the group,
formally or informally. (Cindy Richardson, 2009)
Neighbourhood Coalition Support Group (NCSG) A support committee comprised of
delegates from each of the 12 existing neighbourhood groups
of the City of Guelph, plus City staff advisors. (Guelph.ca)
Prevention/Preparedness - The process of planning and preparations for a potential
disaster. A state of adequate preparedness (merriam-
webster.com)
Public Alert Messaging (PAM) A geographical information system based emergency
notification system capable of voice messaging all businesses
and residences within the City of Guelph during an emergency.
(City of Guelph)
Recovery - The rebuilding of an area affected by a disaster or emergency,
the establishment of a new normal for that affected area.
(merriam-webster.com)
The frame of reference - the City of Guelph
The City of Guelph is a mid-size city located in Southern of approximately
135,000 persons (Statistics Canada, 2009). Guelph has its own municipal Police, Fire
and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) (Guelph.ca). Guelph is a city, municipally
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
5/100
5
distinct from, but located geographically within Wellington County (Municipal Affairs
and Housing).
Guelph is subject to Federal law and regulation, provincial law and regulation,
and municipal by-laws. Guelph maintains an emergency management plan that is
authorized by bylaw City of Guelph By-Law(2009) #18713 (City of Guelph) that
prescribes the required emergency management plan in accordance with the Emergency
Management and Civil Protection Act of Ontario, R.S.O. 1990 (EMCPA). This requires
that the municipality have in place a Community Emergency Management Coordinator,
and Emergency Operations Center, and an Emergency Management Plan. In addition,
the municipality must train members and exercise its Emergency Management Plan at
least once per year. At present, the training and exercise includes staff members and some
volunteer agencies within the City.
Guelph is located at 4335'N, 8020'W (www.mapsofworld.com), and consists of
rolling terrain, and is bisected by two rivers. The Eramosa River flows into the City from
the northeast, with its headwaters in the northern area of Wellington County. The
Eramosa River is a tributary of the Speed River, joining with the Speed at the confluence
of the two rivers, located in the downtown area of Guelph. The Speed River flows into
Guelph from the north, with its headwaters located in the Luther marsh, at the
northwestern area of Wellington County. The Speed River is a major contributory of the
Grand River watershed, and the Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA) manages
both the Speed and Eramosa rivers. The GRCA has built and maintains flood control
structures located on the Speed River at the Guelph Lake (dam), and operates weirs in
Royal City Park in the downtown area of Guelph.
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
6/100
6
The major employers in Guelph are government, university, and light and heavy
manufacturing (City of Guelph). The population of Guelph is affected daily by both
influx and outflow for employment. In the geographic south east of Guelph, a high
percentage of the population is involved in commuting outside the community for
employment. In part, this is due to the proximity of this residential area to provincial
highway 401, a main east/west transportation corridor in southern Ontario.
Guelph is a local hub for agriculture in the southwest area of Ontario. Guelph is
home to the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, the University of Guelph
(a major agriculture school) including the Ontario Veterinary College, and Conestoga
College.
The community itself has encouraged the growth and development of
neighborhood groups to enhance the quality of life in the city (City of Guelph). These
groups were initially formed 10 years ago (personal communication, Cindy Richardson,
2009) and were tasked with community building activities. Their source of funding
continues to be the City of Guelph, and at present, the tasks and activities of these groups
are under study by the City. These groups are formed by neighborhood, by utilizing
natural and geographic boundaries to describe the areas serviced. At present, there are 12
neighborhood groups that have formed and are active within the City (personal
communication, Cindy Richardson, 2009). Each of these neighborhood groups has its
own governance style, and membership duties. Each of the neighborhood groups is
invited to participate in the Neighborhood Coalition Support Group (NCSG), whose
function is to coordinate and offer support for each of the individual neighborhood
groups.
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
7/100
7
The neighbourhood groups are funded by the City, and are responsible for
enhancing the quality of life within the borders of their neighbourhood area.
Neighbourhood group organizations primarily consist of volunteers, and they have
executive functions that are not consistent across the 12 groups. Some groups have city-
funded coordinators in paid staff positions; others do not (personal communication,
Cindy Richardson, 2009). A map of the geographic distribution of the neighbourhood
groups is attached at Appendix A. All neighbourhood groups are invited to contribute
delegates to the Neighbourhood Support Coalition.
A municipal council, consisting of an elected mayor and 12 councilors who are
elected by a ward system, governs Guelph. There are two councilors elected from each of
the 6 wards within the City. The councilors sit as a council of the whole and as separate
committees responsible for service areas. City council encourages public participation in
the governance of the city, and has established and published guiding principles for
public involvement (City of Guelph). Guelph supports community involvement, and has
staff assigned to develop and assist neighborhood groups, and actively encourages
neighborhoods to engage themselves to create a strong and vibrant community. These
neighbourhood groups are encouraged to define neighborhood areas through the use of
geographic features such as rivers and green space boundaries, and they are encouraged
and coordinated through the Neighborhood Support Coalition. Each of the individual
neighborhood groups operates autonomously at the neighborhood level to support the
needs of children youth and families within the neighborhood (City of Guelph).
Guelph has an emergency management structure at a municipal level. The Fire
Chief is designated as the Director of Emergency Services, and as such is the senior staff
member directly responsible for emergency management within the City. Ontario
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
8/100
8
requires that each community have a designated Emergency Management Coordinator,
and recommends that alternates also be named. Accordingly, Guelph has a consultant
under contract as the Community Emergency Management Coordinator (CEMC), and
maintains two alternate CEMCs who are full time employees assigned to other full time
duties but who can assume the CEMC role if needed. No staff is assigned directly to
emergency management on a full time basis. The emergency bylaw (City of Guelph By-
Law(2009) #18713) stipulates that Guelph will comply with the Regulations issued
under the EMCPA for communities, requiring an Emergency Management Coordinator
(CEMC), an Emergency Operations Centre (EOC), an Emergency Operations Control
Group (EOCG) and regular training and exercising of the emergency plan (City of
Guelph).
The Guelph EOC is a fully equipped primary facility located within a secure
building that is part of the municipal holdings. There is also a backup EOC within the
municipality. In an emergency, either of these facilities could be used to host the EOCG.
The EOCG is comprised of senior staff of various City departments (e.g, Police
Chief, Fire Chief, Chief Administrative Official, Mayor, and Director of Public Works)
and politicians who become the emergency decision makers for the municipality in a time
of emergency. There are primary members and alternate members for each of the areas
represented. In addition to these members, other community agencies or community
members can be invited into the EOC during an emergency. There are currently three
duty officers assigned to the EOCG during an emergency. Each of the duty officers has a
background that will assist the EOCG in an emergency.
Guelph has a municipal fire service that consists of a fire headquarters/station
located in the downtown area, and four outlying fire stations housing personnel and
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
9/100
9
equipment. The fire service has one dispatch center located at the headquarters with full
time communicators, and firefighters and officers who are deployed among the
headquarters and stations.
Guelph has a municipal EMS that provides paramedic services to Guelph and
Wellington County. This service consists of primary care paramedics and advanced care
paramedics. The EMS has ambulances and a supervisor/administrative unit (City of
Guelph).
Guelph Police Service is governed by a Police Services Board, and provides
services to the municipality. The Police Service has full time officers and communicators,
and is responsible for providing Public Service Answering Point (PSAP) services for the
City. This PSAP responsibility ensures that the police communications section is staffed
appropriately at all times to answer 911 calls for assistance.
Guelph has a digital trunked emergency communication system that is
interoperable between Police, Fire and EMS. This trunked communication system is also
compatible with the Ontario Government Network of mobile communications. This
allows seamless technical interoperability of Police, Fire and EMS functions with
provincial counterparts if required.
Benefit for the municipality and community in collaborating on emergency management
The Ontario and Canadian emergency management models are centered on the
basis that the individual is responsible for their own wellbeing for the first 72 hours, and
after that assistance will be available through the municipality, the province, and then the
federal government, known as a bottom up approach (Wachtendorf, 2001). Any
emergency or disaster will have impacts on the persons who inhabit that area, and the
local organizations and businesses that serve a community will be front and center during
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
10/100
10
those times, both before the event as part of a mitigation strategy, and post event as part
of the recovery effort (Rodriguez et al., 2007). These organizations include not only local
emergency management officials, but also local service agencies providing services to a
community. These can be professional organizations and businesses, or primarily
volunteers. They form part of the capacity of the community to provide for itself, and an
important part of the fabric of a community(Waugh & Streib, 2006).
Guelph already utilizes several community volunteer and professional agencies as
part of its emergency planning such as St. John Ambulance and the Humane Society.
Engaging and utilizing dedicated community minded persons involved with
neighbourhood groups who are willing to assist others in a time of emergency is a natural
extension of the established practice. The municipality will benefit from having a
formalized interaction during an emergency with established neighbourhood groups
through the additional capacity neighbourhood groups have to communicate information,
pre-organized community minded volunteers, and the proximity of resources to the
affected areas in the community. The neighbourhood groups will also benefit from
formalizing a relationship with City emergency managers that provides them with
information, allows community members to help themselves, and assists in the
fulfillment of their organizational goals. This ability to help itself is an important part of
any recovery effort in assisting a community to heal after an emergency.
What is not clear is what the level of acceptance of this involvement will be.
There are two elements to consider in community involvement: that of the neighbourhood
groups themselves being able and committed to involvement in community emergencies
by offering advice and communication abilities to the municipality, and secondly the
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
11/100
11
level of assistance and involvement by the community that the municipality will be
willing to accept and at what direct cost to the municipal budget.
The purpose of this research study is to investigate the effectiveness of
communication between the City of Guelph, which retains responsibility for emergency
planning, and neighborhood groups within Guelph, which have the goal of improving the
quality of life in the community. Residents and businesses of the community must be
adequately informed and engaged in the emergency management process in order to
assist themselves in a time of emergency (Rodriguez et al., 2007). This requires effective
communications as part of the emergency prevention and mitigation processes. To be
effective, communication must engage stakeholders and inspire them to participate as full
partners in the emergency management process. For example,
In order for weather forecasts and warnings to be useful to individuals and
communities, they must be understood, must meet their needs, and must provide
accurate and reliable information as well as sufficient lead time to allow them to
take appropriate action. (Rodriguez et al., 2007, p. 477).
Research Needs
The need for research in community engagement for emergency management is
immense. We mitigate against hazards occurring; however, failure to communicate with
the potentially affected population thereby affording the opportunity to further reduce
losses of property, injury or death, is a failure to do due diligence (EMO Guidelines,
2008, p. ii). Failing to do due diligence will result in legal action being taken, and
ethically it will be very difficult to accept, being indicative of a failure in leadership by
emergency management professionals. Our population trusts in the municipality to
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
12/100
12
ensure that due diligence is done, and that before and during a time of disaster, the
municipality will be able to provide the required planning and resources to ensure the
safety and security of the populace. The failure to prepare and adequately communicate
with an area affected by a disaster, prior to the disaster occurring, will be a source of
litigation after a disaster. Morally and ethically, we as disaster management professionals
must ensure that the expectations of the public are met or exceeded.
Assumptions
As part of this research I have made an assumption that both neighbourhood
groups and the municipality will see the benefit in the community being involved in
emergency management. I have also made the assumption that executive members of
neighbourhood groups will be prepared to answer a survey; that they will see
involvement in emergency management as part of their mandate to improve the quality of
life in their neighbourhood; that they will be interested in participating in this research
project; and that they will answer questions honestly reflecting their own knowledge
about their neighbourhood groups. I have assumed that executive members of
neighbourhood groups have a good working knowledge of their membership, and that
they have the desire, ability and willingness to provide resources, material or human, to
assist others in their community in an emergency. I have assumed that members of
neighbourhood groups are not suffering from volunteer burn out.
I have also made some assumptions about the municipality: that the municipality
itself will be prepared to engage the neighbourhood groups and have them participate as
emergency management partners to help serve the community. I have assumed that the
municipality would welcome a pool of organized volunteers when assistance was
required, putting the community need ahead of any financial, contractual, or human
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
13/100
13
resource use issues during an emergency. I have assumed that the municipality would be
prepared to share resources without expectation of reimbursement for them with the
understanding that the resources will benefit the community, not specific individuals or
businesses. I have assumed that the municipality desires the best possible emergency
management program for the community, and that it will welcome community input and
involvement in this area.
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
14/100
14
Chapter 2 Literature review
A review of the literature reveals that considerable research has been done in the
area of crisis communications (Basolo et al., 2009; Brandon, 2002; Comfort & Haase,
2006; Eisenmann et al., 2007; Gow, 2007; Kapucu, 2008; Kapucu 2008A; Paton, 2003;
Seeger, 2006; Spence et al, 2007) and based on this literature review, how well we
communicate with the public to ensure preparedness has not been a major area of study.
The majority of the published research available deals with communication in the actual
time of crisis, rather than communication to enhance pro-active response in the
community. As a result, the literature review for this study was conducted with a focus on
the following literature review themes: (1) the need for a definition of a crisis, (2)
international guidelines, (3) the North American experience documented in literature thus
far, and (4) community groups and their importance in improving quality of life in the
community. Literature on each of these themes is presented in turn.
Crisis defined
Spence et al. (2007), define crisis as a specific, unexpected, and non-routine event
or series of events that create high levels of uncertainty and threaten or are perceived to
threaten high priority goals(p. 540). Spence et al crafted a list of crises that includes
chemical or nuclear disasters, major plane crashes, space exploration catastrophes,
terrorist attacks, and public health threats. They believe a crisis to be an event that
requires extraordinary efforts and quick responses to counteract these events and avoid
disruption of everyday life. Emergency management prepares for, responds to, and
assists in the recovery from a crisis event. Perry (2007) links crisis and disaster, noting
that we must decide if they are a social phenomenon, a natural or technological process.
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
15/100
15
Boin and THart (2007) state The terms crisis and disaster are often used
synonymously(p. 42), and note that disaster researchers have paid little attention to
conflicts between people and the breakdown of economic and technological systems in
disaster planning. Burby (1998) notes that disasters include the disruption of economic
systems. The noted literature shows a wide definition of what can be considered a crisis
or disaster within the realm of emergency management, requiring a broad spectrum of
planning, communication and prevention strategy.
International Guidelines
The Humanitarian Accountability Partnership (HAP) is an international
association that is the humanitarian sector's first international self-regulatory body
(HAP, 2009). This is a governing body of humanitarian relief agencies who undertake to
support populations affected by disaster in a time of need. This standard was created to
ensure that agencies providing humanitarian need were doing so in a consistent manner.
Agencies providing assistance to an affected populace must have regard to the needs of
that populace. Additional HAP standards include reducing the risk of further disaster by
ensuring that assistance rendered does not further jeopardize the safety and wellbeing of
the population, and that assistance is reflective of the need of the people served, not the
donors ability to provide finances and material. This can be extrapolated in the area of
mitigation/preparedness to include that the needs of the people served must be taken into
account prior to any emergency occurring. Scott Graham of the American Red Cross
noted that it is always a challenge to help donors find the right way. What they want to
donate is not always appropriate (personal communication, September 28, 2009). The
engagement of the community is mandated to ensure a proper two-way flow of
communication exists prior to any actual emergency. If proper communication exists, this
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
16/100
16
will assist the community preparedness and mitigation efforts prior to the emergency, and
will facilitate community engagement in response and recovery efforts to a greater
degree. It is the expectation of the worlds major relief agencies that organizations
providing relief will be responsive to the needs of the communities they serve. The same
is true of municipalities in regard to disaster planning; they must be responsive to the
needs of the communities they serve.
The United Nations through its international strategy for disaster reduction
(UN/ISDR) also reflects this requirement of community engagement. In the Hyogo
framework, disaster reduction was determined to be a national and local priority.
Specifically noted was the need for community participation:
Promote community participation in disaster risk reduction through the adoption
of specific policies, the promotion of networking, the strategic management of
volunteer resrouces, the attribution of roles and responsibilities and the delegation
and provision of the necessary resources. (United Nations)
North American experiences
Naim Kapucu (2008) supports the view that agencies must be responsive to the
needs of their communities and engage them in communicating effectively to achieve
success in emergency planning and preparedness. Kapucu contrasts communication
approaches taken during hurricane Katrina by the State of Louisiana and the hurricane
preparedness efforts undertaken in the State of Florida during the 2004 hurricane season.
He maintains the State of Florida took a pro-active approach to communication,
participating in community events and workshops to ensure high levels of preparedness
existed prior to the actual hurricane season. During Katrina, we know what the
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
17/100
17
communication efforts were to warn people of the impending approach of the hurricane,
yet with little pre-education done, the level of preparation was not high. I agree with
Kapucus view that emergency managers must actively engage the community in order to
provide effective communication to the community prior to the actual emergency event.
The Florida experience is exemplified as a model to follow, engaging the community as a
prevention strategy, thereby reducing risks to the population (Betts, 2007; Harrison-
Ward, 2003).
In the Seeger (2006) article, the author acknowledges the importance of being
proactive in the crisis communication process. This he describes as pre-event planning,
leading the reader to believe that the action still responds to the crisis. However, he does
acknowledge the value of partnerships with the public. Ideally, the public can serve as a
resource, rather than a burden, in risk and crisis management. Thus, crisis communication
best practices would emphasize a dialogic approach (Seeger, 2006, p.238). I agree with
Seegers approach in that investing time and effort in creating effective dialogue will
enhance community safety and self-help.
Community and Neighbourhood Groups
Norris et al. (2008) assert that the community must have citizen engagement, which
can occur through a process of establishing, maintaining and participating in community
groups. They believe that citizen participation is a fundamental element of community
resiliency and creates a sense of belonging required to keep a community together.
Neighbourhood groups or associations are defined as: a civic organization oriented toward
maintaining or improving the quality of life in a geographically delimited residential area
(Logan & Rabrenovic, 1990).
In Murphy (2007) we find an acknowledgement that relationships, or lack of
relationships within a community can cause required resources to be funneled either to or
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
18/100
18
away from an affected area. This unequal distribution of social capital leaves some areas of
a society potentially disadvantaged, and others receiving disproportionately more assistance
that they should. Murphy also describes, using a Canadian example, how emergent social
groups offering ad-hoc assistance within the community demonstrate a desire to help not
only one self, but also those in similar circumstances. McEntire (2002) acknowledges that
emergent groups are important during an emergency response after disaster, and suggest
that emergency managers should be prepared to engage them.
In Kretzman and McKnight (1993) we find the concept of capacity focused
approach to community building. This utilizes the capacity found within the community
to assist in the communitys own development. An asset in that community can be as
simple as a neighborhood association that is empowered to make the quality of life in that
community better for the residents.
In Gumpert and Drucker (2008) they note that a standard of living is distinct from
a quality of life. Neighborhood groups and communities are dedicated to improving the
quality of life for those in the community (Kretzman & McKnight, 1993). This quality of
life can be in both tangible and intangible ways. Disaster preparedness contributes to
resilience, thereby increasing quality of life.
Neighbourhood group involvement
Ikeda (1982) examined public compliance with an evacuation order in Obhu,
Japan that was transmitted by several means; by media, by officials by way of patrol car,
and through neighbourhood association communication. In Ohbu, neighbourhood
associations have as their smallest unit 10 to 20 neighbouring families, and five to 10
units make up an association. This study concluded (p 57) that generally diffusion of
warning through a neighborhood association was not effective. What it also concluded
was that when neighborhood association was the medium (personal) the message was
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
19/100
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
20/100
20
there is a difference in the informational requirements of individuals depending upon
gender. Given the higher propensity of females to reach out to others within their
community for information, providing information through these trusted community
sources would fill an information void with accurate, timely guidance. Cottrell concludes
that resilience can be enhanced through the encouragement of coping strategies including
effective support networks, including tapping into existing community organizations.
Victoria (2009) recognizes that community-based disaster management that builds
on and strengthens community capacity reduces vulnerability and disaster risk. Victoria
notes that in community based disaster risk management (CBDRM) the community
members are the main actors. They benefit both in the participatory process and the
results of CBDRM and community development.
Paton (2003) notes the positive effect of collaboration within a community
regardless of the type of initially shared problem. Paton suggests that integration of the
community is required in emergency management.
To facilitate this integration, representatives of community groups (e.g.
community boards or action groups, neighborhood watch, religious and ethnic
groups) could be invited to review hazard scenarios with regard to the potential
challenges, opportunities and threats they could pose for each group.(p. 314)
He reiterates there is a need for emergency planning to empower the community,
involving the community in the process rather than imposing decisions on it. I believe
that this would be a goal to achieve, to involve the community through neighbourhood
groups at the base level in decisions. I believe that this will not occur all at once, and that
steps must be taken toward gradual involvement. This includes establishing the level of
acceptance within neighbourhood groups for involvement in the emergency management
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
21/100
21
process, not only with the neighbourhood groups themselves, but also with the
emergency management practitioners and officials.
Waugh and Streib (2006) recognize that emergency management has changed
from its initial civil defence roots and has become flexible in how the organizations
operate within a framework. The adaptability of the emergency management system has
become key to a successful outcome. The emergency manager must be able to work
effectively with any coalition of organizations, professional or non-professional, that is
required to address the emergency faced. I believe that this must include organized
neighbourhood groups, as they are at the ground level in any prevention, mitigation, and
recovery effort within the community. Waugh and Strieb note that volunteers provide
essential surge capacity and links to community resources (p. 132). This surge of
individuals may be required to augment first responder and established capacities. Waugh
and Streib understand that emergency management capacity is built from the ground up.
Neighbourhood and community programs have to stand on their own because assistance
may not arrive for hours or days (p.133),(Pearce, 2002). This view is consistent with that
of emergency management in Canada, which assumes individual families must be
prepared to exist without assistance for the first 72 hours.
Stallings and Quarantelli (1985) acknowledge that at present emergent groups
exist within emergencies in the response phase primarily, and less so at in the
preparedness and recovery phases. They define emergent groups as private citizens who
work together in pursuit of collective goals relevant to actual or potential disasters but
whose organization has not yet become institutionalized (p. 94). By this definition,
neighbourhood groups can be considered emergent groups. Emergency mangers must
plan to engage these neighbourhood groups, and prior to any emergency occurring, public
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
22/100
22
officials and emergency managers may want to facilitate this engagement. Pre-planning
with these neighbourhood groups prior to an emergency allows emergency managers to
deal with organized groups with an established legitimate relationship, rather than dealing
with isolated individuals or independent groups of individuals ad hoc during an
emergency. Collaboration is key to the emergency effort (Waugh & Strieb, 2006) and
through early engagement, that coordination is likely to be more effective by working
with known entities that are already invested in the process, rather than trying to establish
relationships with new stakeholders during an emergency situation.
Pearce (2002) recognizes that public participation in disaster management is
gradually becoming accepted and is key for successful prevention initiatives. This
includes the inclusion of the public through development of neighbourhood emergency
programs. Pearce cites Coquitlam, British Columbia as an example of neighbourhood
level engagement in emergency management through disaster equipment inventories,
stockpiling of supplies, and through knowledge of individuals in the neighbourhood who
have special needs during an emergency. Dorcey and McDaniels (1999) as contained in
Pearce (2002) state:
Participation in voluntary associations, embodying norms of trust, reciprocity,
tolerance, and inclusion, and activating networks of public communication, are
believed to build and maintain the social capital upon which the vitality of the
governance system and sustainable development are dependent.(p. 23)
Literature review synopsis
As a result of the review of the noted literature, I have concluded that during the
phases of an emergency, crisis or disaster there are expectations about how agencies are
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
23/100
23
to conduct themselves. This includes the notion of ensuring that the needs of those who
are affected are taken into account, and that the actions taken are reflective of that need as
opposed to actions taken strictly on the abilities of the donors, agencies or governments.
Knowing the makeup and requirements of the population served is key to providing the
appropriate assistance. This responsiveness to the needs of those served is internationally
recognized and applied by major humanitarian groups.
Engagement of the community is always desirable in emergency planning. The
effectiveness of the engagement affects the preparedness and response efforts.
Communication is key to preparedness and mitigation efforts in a community, and
proactive efforts are worthwhile. One must consider warning fatigue with repeated
warnings being given to a community, and the effect that this will have on the receivers
of the warnings.
Community groups exist in our communities to enhance the way of life in their
communities, and they can be a resource within them. Neighbourhood groups are
community groups, and they consist of persons already predisposed to enhancing the
quality of life in their neighbourhood area.
Warnings received through trusted sources, such as neighbourhood groups, may
be more effective than those otherwise transmitted. During an emergency, compliance
with directives is highly desired to save property and life. Compliance is best gained in a
voluntary manner, and this is likely to be higher when the source of the request is trusted.
This is particularly important when a community is likely to turn inward for information,
when credibility of the source is an issue. The participation of the community through
information sharing is desirable in all phases of an emergency, and the collaboration with
the community during mitigation/preparedness and recovery is highly desired.
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
24/100
24
Emergency management has changed from a top down model, to a bottom driven
model, where the individuals are the first line of defence. This responsibility must be
communicated clearly, and the emergency management system must be a flexible one
that can adapt to changing circumstances. Emergencies will require resources greater than
can be readily kept on hand, and the community itself can be used to provide the
resources needed for this surge effort. There is a desire to be involved in the
improvement of communities by the residents of those communities, and during an
emergency these individuals and groups will emerge. The identification and engagement
of these groups prior to an emergency will increase the collaborative success during an
emergency.
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
25/100
25
Chapter 3 Research conduct and ethics
Research conduct and ethics
The source of the survey
The themes and information identified in the review of literature, combined with
the knowledge I have acquired through the course of studies in Disaster and Emergency
Management at Royal Roads University, and my practical experience as a CEMC have
guided the development of the survey questions that were prepared as part of this
research. These questions were adapted to be presented to neighbourhood group
executive members, general members, and to the EOCG members of the City of Guelph.
This was required to determine not only the desire and capacity of the community to be
involved in emergency management, but the level of acceptance EOCG members and
alternates have for the involvement of the community in emergency management. One of
the goals of this research project was to ensure that the responding members of
neighbourhood groups pondered the situation that they live in, and that this reflective
process would result in them learning more about their situation and how they interact
with emergency management in the community.
Introduction
The data collection tool that was used for this research was an online survey designed
to be accessible initially by executive members of the neighbourhood groups only. This
survey was developed to obtain information about the neighbourhood groups themselves,
the knowledge level of emergencies and emergency management of the executive
members of the neighbourhood groups, the willingness of the neighbourhood groups to
be involved in the emergency management process as a stakeholder and partner of the
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
26/100
26
City of Guelph, and the level of satisfaction with the current communication processes
between the City of Guelph and the neighbourhood groups. In this chapter, I describe
how the survey was developed for use with neighbourhood groups, and then how the
survey was adapted for use with EOCG members and alternates.
Design
The design of the survey was directed so that the initial questions would allow an
assessment of the understanding of the level of comprehension of the respondents with
respect to their responsibilities during an emergency. The initial survey was separated
into several identifiable sections: individual, neighbourhood group preparedness, group
events, public warnings, and local examples of communication during an emergency.
Regardless of the knowledge level of the respondents, the survey was designed to
reinforce an understanding of what those responsibilities are, and encourage learning
during this survey from the respondents themselves. Except for the general emergency
section, which was designed to get a baseline of emergency management knowledge,
each of the sections was designed to obtain responses to the research question and sub-
questions.
Individual section
During an emergency, access to timely and accurate information is critical, so
respondents were asked about awareness of information, and where they were most likely
to get their information from in a time of emergency. Thirteen choices were put forward
for consideration. These choices were based on literature and my experience as an
emergency management coordinator, and knowledge of the City of Guelphs
commitment to the use of local media for the dissemination of information. Based on the
local communication strategy, I anticipated that television and radio would be very high
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
27/100
27
in the ranking. Gow (2007) also acknowledges the emphasis that the federal strategies
place on radio and television communication in an emergency. Devices such as radio,
television, cellular/cordless phones and computers/modems for Internet access can be
hampered by electrical interruption, and the consideration of this as a point of failure for
the respondent during an emergency is important. Understanding the level of
preparedness of the respondents is important to provide official communication in a
format that is accessible for the target audience during an emergency. Providing
information in a format that can not be easily accessed or utilized during an emergency is
futile, and may lead to vital instructions not being received or understood (Rodriguez et
al, 2007).
Neighbourhood Group Preparedness Section
The thrust of this research project is to understand the preparedness level of the
neighbourhood groups themselves. The first few questions were designed to understand
how the neighbourhood groups themselves are organized, the numbers of participants,
how often the neighbourhood groups meet, and what their events consist of. In the next
series of questions, the existence of membership information and updates to that
information, the use of the information, and ability to utilize the information was inquired
about. This centered initially on traditional information dissemination
(television/radio/print), and then diverged to website based information maintained by the
neighbourhood groups. A determination of access to information hosted by the
neighbourhood group was made, whether there is general information available to anyone
with an internet connection, and a secured section with information only available to
those registered members with access to a password protected section of the website was
made. Next, to make use of the communication potential within the neighbourhood
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
28/100
28
group, inquiry was made about how prepared the respondents would be to share
information that may identify them as a person in need of assistance during an emergency
(example: mobility issues, health issues). To respond to this need, inquiry was made
about items that may be available in the neighbourhood to assist during that emergency,
and the desirability of mutual support for neighbourhood members. As not all persons
and families have Internet access, and this may be a method of distributing information,
the availability of a neighbourhood internet access point was inquired about.
Preparedness of individuals and their ability to act in an emergency is influenced by
the sense of how prepared the individual thinks that they are (Sorensen & Sorensen,
2007) so respondents were then asked to rate how prepared they were to cope with an
emergency situation, how important emergency preparedness was to them personally, and
the importance of information availability during a crisis. During a crisis official
communication is issued from the City of Guelph EOCG (City of Guelph emergency
plan, 2010). How prepared the respondents believe they are to obtain information during
an emergency then becomes important information, as does how well the City of Guelph
communicates with the neighbourhood groups on a regular basis, and how well the
neighbourhood group communicates with its members as a whole under normal
circumstances. To determine the preparedness of the neighbourhood groups to assist
themselves and others a series of questions were aimed at understanding how well
prepared the respondents believed they were to cope themselves, including with their
physical and informational needs, and how well prepared they were to assist or not assist
others during an emergency.
Events Information Section
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
29/100
29
In this short section, questions were posed to determine if thus far in the survey the
respondents had learned anything about their roles and responsibilities in an emergency,
and they were provided with an example of an emergency that affected the entire eastern
seaboard of North America on the14th of August, 2003. Questions about what
information was shared officially during that large scale event, and whether or not it was
sufficient for the respondents needs, and appropriate or not appropriate given the
circumstances were posed to gain insight on how the City of Guelph has communicated
in the past during a large scale emergency.
Public Warnings
In this section, I posed questions to determine how the respondents would react to
preparatory warnings and instructions given for an impending emergency. This was asked
in the context of a frequently distributed warning about the level of power consumption
during the peak summer months. I was interested in whether or not the respondents
followed the warnings/requests because the past practice of respondents will be a good
predictor of the future behavior of these persons under similar circumstances (Wilson,
2009). I then posed a similar question to determine if their behavior changes in response
to increased numbers of requests to take the same action.
Pineridge Tornado
In this section I described briefly a tornado that touched down in the City of Guelph
in 2000. During that emergency, several directions were issued by the EOCG for
residents to comply with. These were for the most part adhered to, but the satisfaction
with the communication was the subject of these questions. The type of communication if
any, any warnings received, and the number of sources those warning were received from
were inquired about. I also explored whether the repeated broadcast of warning
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
30/100
30
information affects the way the respondents either took or did not take action.
Respondents were questioned about their receipt of repeated warnings of impending
severe weather where no damage results, and how it may influence their perceptions the
validity of future warnings they receive.
Communication Options
In this section, respondents were asked about their preferences in the receipt of
official information from the City of Guelph. The City of Guelph has access to a
Geographical Interface System for the automated electronic dissemination of official
information during an emergency. At present, this utilizes data from a utility provider,
and the next series of questions explored the preferences for the respondents to sign up
for the receipt of emergency information. Whether this service was provided free or
through a service subscription basis was the follow up inquiry.
The last section of the survey was detached electronically from the previous
survey responses, as it asked which neighbourhood group the respondents belonged to.
Thus, respondents remained anonymous.
Ethics
This survey was conducted in accordance with the rules for ethical conduct as set
out and approved by the Ethical Review Board of Royal Roads University. Respondents
to this survey could abandon the survey at any time without penalty.
Challenges
The survey was released to the executive members of the 12 neighbourhood
groups for the City of Guelph. The Neighbourhood Support Coalition is a group
comprised of representation from all 12 neighbourhood groups within the City of Guelph.
I met with the Neighbourhood Support Coalition prior to the approval of this research by
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
31/100
31
Royal Roads University, and obtained the Coalitions support to have four surveys
completed by each of the neighbourhood groups as part of this research. Upon the
release of this survey, the links to the electronic survey and a paper version of the
survey were provided to the neighbourhood groups for data collection. After a short time,
it became apparent that an approximate 50% response rate was experienced and the vast
majority of these were partially filled out. Once aware of this, I adapted the survey
questions and provided a new survey link and paper survey to the neighbourhood groups
for release to their general membership. This was done to address the potential for
executive member volunteer fatigue. I believed that information already received from
core executive members would be enhanced by any information received from general
members. The survey was adapted and questions that pertained only to executive
members were removed from the survey.
EOCG members and alternates survey
Although this research was designed to assess the capacities that exist among
neighbourhood groups to be involved in the emergency management processes of the
City of Guelph, any involvement requires not only the acceptance of the neighbourhood
groups involved in the community, but also the approval and acceptance of the senior
managers of the City of Guelph, many of whom are core members of the EOCG. The
initial inquiry was to determine the awareness of the senior managers of the
neighbourhood groups that exist within the City of Guelph. Next was a direct inquiry to
determine whether or not the senior managers would consider the use of the
neighbourhood groups during a time of emergency as a part of the overall City of Guelph
emergency plan, and how they could be best incorporated into that plan. The City of
Guelph has conducted Hazard Assessment and Risk Identification (HIRA) activities, and
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
32/100
32
has produced information about the hazards and risks within the City. The ability to
release this information, providing specific risk information to neighbourhood population
directly affected by these risks and hazards for inclusion in their individual
neighbourhood group web information would require the support of the EOCG and senior
managers, and they were queried about their support for the release of this kind of
information. I believe that neighbourhood groups could provide secondary means of
communication during an emergency, and the EOCG and senior managers are
responsible for the dissemination of information, so support must exist from this group
for the inclusion of neighbourhood groups as part of a distribution list for information
updates in an emergency. Likewise, neighbourhood groups are formed by a committed
group of volunteers dedicated to improving the quality of life in their community. During
an emergency, these individuals may have the ability to provide a core group of
volunteers who could work under the supervision of City employees. Consequently
questions were asked to determine whether the senior managers and EOCG members
would consider the use of neighbourhood groups in this manner.
Questions were crafted to determine if senior managers and EOCG members would
consider the sharing and delivery of City supplies such as fuel that could be used by
neighbourhood group volunteers during an emergency. Lastly, questions were asked to
determine if there would be support for neighbourhood groups being provided with
stockpiles of supplies such as water and first aid supplies for distribution during an
emergency. This would have to be accepted by senior managers and EOCG members as
it would have an ongoing budgetary impact, but would have the affect of relieving first
responders of routine triage duties in an emergency assuming it could be combined with
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
33/100
33
the organizational and training abilities of an established community service group such
as St Johns Ambulance.
Data Collection
Data for this research was collected by the utilization of commercial survey
software. In total, two separate surveys were crafted around the research question and
sub-questions, and were entered into the electronic survey software system. In addition,
paper copies of the surveys were also produced and these were provided to
neighbourhood groups for distribution to their executive and general members, and senior
staff members of the City of Guelph. The data collection took place starting in early
January 2010, and was completed by the 9th of March 2010 when the final survey
information was received from neighbourhood group executive members. The paper
versions of the neighbourhood group survey were collected by the Community and
Program Development Manager for the City of Guelph without identifying the source of
the data, and forwarded on to me. In total, I had 9 neighbourhood group executive
members and 18 EOCG members respond, for a total of 27 responses.
Upon receiving the data, I collated the data collected electronically through the
survey system by exporting the results into an Excel document. The data received in
paper format was then merged with the electronically collected data, and I produced raw
data results for each of the questions. This was done with both the executive members
survey from the Neighbourhood Groups and the Senior Managers survey sent to EOCG
members. Both surveys were compiled in this raw format, and the survey responses were
grouped to provide answers to the research questions.
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
34/100
34
Chapter 4 Data analysis
Data Analysis
In the following section I group the research questions with the responses
received both from the Neighbourhood Groups and from EOCG members. I will interpret
how this data offers opportunity for the City of Guelph and for the Neighbourhood
Groups to contribute to a safer, more prepared community in a time of emergency.
The neighbourhood group results the community responds
The research question was What role do neighborhood groups play in preparing
residents to understand their roles and responsibilities for self-preservation and recovery
in the City of Guelph prior to, during, and after an emergency? In order to understand
the totality of the question, it was important to break this overarching question into
components to understand what neighbourhood groups exist within the City of Guelph,
and how they can best prepare residents to understand their roles and responsibilities
during an emergency. To do this, the neighbourhood groups must be current and active,
and have members who are prepared to attend and communicate with the neighbourhood
groups. Initially I needed to establish what the general knowledge about emergencies
among the executive members of neighbourhood groups was. All of the respondents
reported knowing that an emergency can occur at virtually any time, and 88.88%
acknowledged knowing the definition of an emergency. Fifty five percent of respondents
reported that they were not aware of the 72 hour self sufficiency requirement in
emergency planning, yet 55% of respondents were prepared with stocks of food and
water that would meet their household needs for 72 hours. When asked to rate how well
prepared they were to deal with a 72 hour crisis, 44% responded that they were mostly
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
35/100
35
prepared, prepared, or completely prepared. When asked to rate how well they would like
to be prepared for a 72 hour crisis, 77% reported they would like to be mostly prepared,
prepared, or completely prepared. For communication in an emergency, we very often
depend upon devices that require electricity to receive information. Sixty six percent of
respondents reported that they would be hampered in receiving information that may
assist them if electricity was interrupted during an emergency.
The information received indicates that the respondents acknowledge emergencies
can occur, but that they were not familiar with their own individual responsibilities
during an emergency. Even though this familiarity was not present, most felt that they
would be able to provide for their household needs. Most did however report that the lack
of electrical service would hamper their abilities to receive information in an emergency,
as can be seen in Table 1.
Table 1
Some devices that we commonly use in the household require electricity to function(television/radio/cordless phones). Would the lack of electricity hamper your ability to
obtain information during an emergency?
Answer Sample Percentage
Yes 6 66.66%
No 3 33.33%
Total 9
Neighbourhood groups in the City of Guelph have a mandate to enhance the
quality of life. That is their mission in the community and to fulfill that mission, they
recruit families and persons as part of the general membership of their neighbourhood
group. Of the nine respondents to the executive member survey, all reported that they
had community members in their neighbourhood groups. Respondents reported that their
neighbourhood group sizes ranged from an unknown number of members through to a
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
36/100
36
neighbourhood group of approximately 3000 members. The majority (five) responded
that they had a neighbourhood group of approximately 100 persons (+- 30). This would
equate to approximately 100 families that would be affected by each of the
neighbourhood groups. Some groups reported being able to distribute information
through schools and faith groups in their neighbourhoods, providing further reach for any
information likely to be communicated. The average number of persons attending a
neighbourhood group meeting was approximately 36 persons. Several respondents
described a big difference between the number of persons who would attend a
neighbourhood group meeting versus a social event or function. Eight of the nine
respondents advised that their neighbourhood group met monthly, while one reported that
their group met as was required. Of the nine respondents, four indicated their executive
members met separately from the general meeting, four indicated they did not, and one
provided no other information. This was the same breakdown when the question was
asked about the frequency of executive member meetings. Four responded monthly,
four responded as required, and one responded as not applicable. Inquiry was made
about special events run by the neighbourhood groups, and social events such as
winterfest or movie nights featured prominently with 66% of respondents citing
these as events, 22% responded as hosting child/youth centered events, and 11 % listed
guest speakers.
From the results, we can see that the City of Guelph has established
neighbourhood groups, that are able to offer assistance and influence within their
neighbourhood, and that most of these groups have defined leadership roles within their
groups. Most of these groups concentrate their efforts at present on social events in the
neighbourhood to enhance the sense of community, but few offer opportunities to convey
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
37/100
37
information directly to their members. We also see that the general membership is more
likely to attend a social event than to attend a regular neighbourhood group meeting as is
shown in Table 2.
Table 2
What do special events that are run by your neighbourhood group generally consist of?
Answer CountAverage
Education/training/general interest 0 0%
Guest speakers 1 11.11%
Social events (Winterfest, movie nights) 6 66.66%
Youth/child centered events 2 22.22%
Other 0 0%
Several administrative type questions were put to the survey respondents about
their neighbourhood groups in an effort to understand the organization of neighbourhood
groups, and if improvements to their administrative state would assist in a time of
emergency. The respondents were asked about the roles and responsibilities in their
neighbourhood groups, and 77% reported that there were defined roles and
responsibilities for executive members. Of those reporting defined roles and
responsibilities, various means were used to convey these roles and responsibilities that
included: Terms of References that were discussed at meetings, meetings themselves,
written job descriptions, verbal discussions, e-mails and other documentation. Twenty
two percent of respondents indicated that they do not have a membership list for
individuals in their neighbourhood group, but 88% responded that they did. Of those 88%
with membership lists, 11% updated them at each meeting, 22% semi-annually, and 44%
as needed. Sixty six percent of the neighbourhood executive responded that they were
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
38/100
38
permitted to disseminate information within the group without prior approval from other
executive members. Eighty eight percent of respondents advised that no fan out list for
wide distribution of information existed within their neighbourhood group, yet the 22%
who did have fan out information reported having e-mail addresses, home addresses,
work e-mail addresses, and phone contact information.
This information is very important to the research sub-questions, as engagement
of the members by the executive membership is a required element of utilizing
neighbourhood groups to assist in the creation of more effective community
communications.
Question 1- Understanding our roles
Does the City of Guelph communicate with our neighborhood groups to ensure
that residents understand their roles? Respondents were asked to rate how important
emergency preparedness was to them personally to understand their perspective. Seventy
seven percent of respondents reported that emergency preparedness was either very
important or essential to them personally, and 88% reported either very important or
essential to their family. Likewise, 88% reported that having access to accurate
information and instructions in a time of emergency as very important or essential.
Among the neighbourhood group executive members, 88% responded that there are no
roles and responsibilities among the executive members of their neighbourhood group for
emergency planning. If there are no roles within the neighbourhood group for helping
residents in planning for emergencies through conveying information, we must
understand what level of communication exists within the neighbourhood group now, and
with the City of Guelph both in normal times and during an emergency. This will allow
us to have a foundation to build on.
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
39/100
39
Respondents were asked to describe the nature and frequency of interactions
between the City of Guelph and neighbourhood groups both in general and the executive
members. The responses to this were varied, with some reporting that they have an
engagement coordinator who sits on their executive board leading to constant contact
between entities. Another respondent reported that a City of Guelph community
engagement coordinator attended every other meeting of the neighbourhood group. A
third respondent indicated that the City of Guelph was a great help. A fourth
respondent replied that the communication with the City of Guelph was unknown. A
fifth respondent reported ongoing communications, with regular meetings being called
by either the group or the City, and the engagement of other social services within the
municipal realm within their neighbourhood group.
Respondents were asked whether or not they had learned anything about the roles
and responsibilities they have as a member of the public during an emergency as a result
of completing this survey. Seventy seven percent of respondents reported that they had
learned something new during the completion of this survey. When asked if they would
consider participating in a basic emergency management course that may take up to three
days, 55% responded positively to this idea, indicating support in attending. Eleven
percent suggested that they would attend, but would prefer a shorter duration for the
course, making the overall acceptance of this kind of participation at 66% of the
respondents.
It became apparent that neighbourhood groups are not communicating any type of
emergency preparedness information to help the community understand its role during an
emergency.
Question 2- Effective communications
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
40/100
40
Is communication effective between the City of Guelph and neighborhood groups? As
can be seen in Table 3, 66% of respondents rated that communication with the City of
Guelph is very good on a regular basis. Nine respondents provided information in
response to this question. When this question was adapted to: Rate how well your
neighbourhood group communication is with the City of Guelph during a crisis., less
respondents registered an answer to the question (seven), and the very good response
dropped from 66% to only 14.28%. This is reflected in Table 4.
Table 3
Rate how well your neighbourhood group communication is with the City of Guelph ona regular basis
Answer Sample Percentage
1 - communication is not good at
all
0 0%
2 - communication is occasionally
ok
0 0%
3 - communication is ok and we
get by
1 11.11%
4 - communication is mostly good 2 21.11%
5 - communication is very good 6 66.66%
Total 9
Table 4
Rate how well your neighbourhood group communication is with the City of Guelph
during a crisis.
Answer Sample Percentage
1 - communication is not good at
all
1 14.28%
2 - communication is occasionally
ok
0 0%
3 - communication is ok, we get
by
2 28.57%
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
41/100
41
4 - communication is mostly good 3 42.85%
5 - communication is very good 1 14.28%
Total 7
To look at this in perspective, respondents were asked to use the same scale to
rate their own communications within their neighbourhood and neighbourhood group.
Forty four percent of respondents reported that under normal circumstances
communications within their neighbourhood was either mostly good or very good.
Within the neighbourhood group 66% of respondents reported that communications was
either mostly good or very good. Tables 3 and 4 show how the respondents have
rated their communication under different circumstances. The most dramatic change is in
the communication with the City of Guelph during a crisis, when the satisfaction with
communication drops dramatically.
Respondents were asked to rate how well prepared they believed they were to
provide accurate information to their families during an emergency from the sources
known to them. Sixty six percent reported being either mostly prepared, prepared, or
completely prepared. When this question was adapted to providing the information to
their neighbourhood group in an emergency 55% reported being mostly prepared or
prepared, but none reported being completely prepared.
Respondents were asked to rank from one through 13 which source of information
they would be likely to use, with one being the most likely and 13 being the least likely.
Radio was the overwhelming first choice of respondents for receiving official
information during an emergency with 77.7% of respondents choosing it as the first place
they would turn to for information. Surprisingly, the most popular second choice for
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
42/100
42
information was neighbours with 33% of respondents naming this their second choice.
Television ranked surprisingly low, with one respondent choosing it second, and no other
respondent choosing it higher than fourth. Turning to a neighbourhood group for
information was selected as a third choice, getting 33% of the respondents for their third
choice.
When asked about radio, 77.8% responded with either the AM or FM radio stations
located in Guelph as the radio station they would seek information from first. CBC Radio
(Toronto) was listed by 22% of respondents. Similar results occurred with television,
with 66.7% responding with one of the local television stations, either CTV from
Kitchener or the local cable channel being the station turned to for information. Only
33% of respondents indicated that they were aware of the public information line
maintained by the City of Guelph to access official information.
Respondents were asked to share their thoughts on information provided by the City
of Guelph to neighbourhood groups during the electrical emergency in 2003. They were
asked to share their experiences with types of communication, and asked whether or not
it was appropriate. Overwhelmingly the response was that they received no information
at all officially from the City of Guelph. Some respondents were not part of
neighbourhood groups at the time, but most responded they were not privy to any
communication at the neighbourhood group level. From this past emergency, this shows
that previously there has been no information provided directly to neighbourhood groups
at that time.
Question 3 Local knowledge
How does the City of Guelph ensure an understanding of local emergency plans and
methods exists within our neighborhood groups? Respondents were asked about their
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
43/100
43
knowledge of local emergency management. Seventy eight percent responded that they
or another member of their neighbourhood group had not met with the City of Guelphs
CEMC. 22.22% reported that they had met with the CEMC by attending a community
presentation put on by the CEMC. Eighty nine percent of respondents advised that their
neighbourhood group executive members were not familiar with the City of Guelph
emergency plan, however 55.55% of respondents reported knowing that the emergency
plan is available to the public at City Hall, the public library, and on the Internet.
Although the respondents reported more familiarity with the emergency plan as an
individual, it is unknown what working knowledge the respondents have with the plan.
The respondents were asked about the neighbourhood group providing an Internet access
point for those members of the neighbourhood group who have no Internet access of their
own. Only 33% of the respondents indicated that their neighbourhood group provides
Internet access for neighbourhood group members.
Question 4 The need to self organize
How do we include the need to self organize a response at a neighborhood level
within the municipal plans? The need to respond at an individual level is fundamental to
the emergency management plans in most locations. As noted earlier, communities can
expect to manage themselves for the first 72 hours before municipal assistance can be
expected (EMO, 2008). This is an opportunity for organizations such as neighbourhood
groups to make a difference by creating a mutual aid system within their neighbourhood.
Eighty five percent of respondents reported that they had a knowledge base of some of
the skills and abilities of members of their neighbourhood group that could be used to
assist others in a time of emergency. Sixty seven percent reported that they had a pool of
items that could be used to assist group members in an emergency. Three respondents
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
44/100
44
indicated that their neighbourhood groups had food/water available that could be used to
assist the neighbourhood group members, some reported clothing available, and one
advised that they are linked to a scout group who have much of the equipment and
training that may be required. With the question asked a different way, whether within
the respondents neighbourhood group there was a list or knowledge of
equipment/preparedness items that could be used to support persons in the
neighbourhood, 100% responded that there was no list or knowledge of items in this
category, and 100% also had no mutual support plan in place for sharing of resources
within their neighbourhood group. Sixty three percent of respondents reported having no
knowledge of persons who may need special assistance during emergencies as is shown
in Table 5.
Table 5
Within your neighbourhood group does your executive have knowledge of persons whomay need special assistance during some types of emergencies? (example: require and
oxygen supply, mobility assistance)
Answer Sample Percentage
Yes 3 37.50%
No 5 62.50%
Total 8
Question 5 Repeated warnings
Do repeated warnings prior to an event de-sensitize neighborhood groups to danger,
thereby reducing the seriousness of their required response? If we incorporate our
neighbourhood groups into the emergency management process to assist with preparation
for emergencies, and dissemination about pending emergency situations (an example
being contact made to advise of severe weather approaching which is part of the HIRA
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
45/100
45
for the City of Guelph) we run the risk of de-sensitizing our community with repeated
warnings. This question was put to respondents on the basis of requests for assistance in
reducing the electrical load during hot summer weather. This subject was put forward as
during the past few summers, there have been a frequent warnings issued within the City
of Guelph, where public appeals have been made for the reduction of electricity use to
ease the strain on the electrical grid. One respondent was concerned that over saturation
of warnings can be a problem, but that they take steps despite the many warnings to
reduce their use. Another respondent indicated that they would be influenced positively
by repeated warnings. A different respondent indicated that they listen to and heed the
warnings put out, but questioned why with the advent of smart metering systems, the
electrical utility can not provide more detailed information on individual residential use
of electricity. This respondent did indicate that information prior to an event is critical if
we are to prepare for an event and change behavior of people when required. All (100%)
respondents advised that when the number of requests to reduce grows, they continue to
respond and cut back use. When the subject of emergency warnings was changed to that
of severe weather, a question was asked about the receipt of information about severe
weather before the touchdown of a tornado within the community. Of the eight
respondents to this question, three understood that there were warnings on television and
radio broadcast, three dont recall any warnings being issued at all, three responded
with no information at all provided. When asked about receiving information about
severe weather and if it influences the respondents in making any preparations to
respond, six advised that it does influence them to various degrees, and two indicated that
it did not, with one of those respondents indicating that too many warnings can create
fear in the community. When asked if the repeated warnings occur, when previous
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
46/100
46
warnings had resulted in no damage, did the respondents continue to take preventive
action, 87.5% responded that they did continue to take action, with some evaluating
information from the Weather Network and the Internet to make their decisions.
The EOCG responses
Members of the EOCG and alternates were asked to respond to questions that spoke
to these research questions also. Primarily, the question became what level of
involvement of the community would EOCG members accept. This acknowledges that
there is capacity within a community to respond, however municipal decision makers
must also be prepared to accept the assistance of the community during an emergency.
Past practice, and guidance for funding applications in Ontario require the involvement of
the community, not in response or recovery activities, but in fundraising to facilitate the
Ontario cost sharing arrangements. An assumption was made that members of the EOCG
were familiar with the Emergency Plan and with Emergency legislation in Ontario, as it
forms a portion of their professional expertise, thus no preparatory questions were asked
of these senior managers to determine their level of knowledge in this area. In total 16
individuals answered this survey in either electronic or paper format. 15 responses were
received that were useable, with one responder opting not to submit their responses for
use and those responses are not part of these results.
Question 1- Understanding our roles
Does the City of Guelph communicate with our neighborhood groups to ensure that
residents understand their roles? Responders were asked whether they would support the
idea of neighbourhood group executive/leadership members attending the municipally
hosted Basic Emergency Management Course at some point to better prepare them to
assist others in their neighbourhood if it were affected by an emergency. Seventy seven
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MADEM.2
47/100
47
percent responded positively to this suggestion, with 26.67% responding that they didnt
know. There were no responses received in the no category for this question. When
asked to provide information about this kind of initiative, comments were varied from
outright support by enhancing the level of preparation and education in the community
providing more education will give more mitigation opportunities and help establish a
new normal in a more condensed time frame, through to uncertainty with an impact in
budgeting and resources being the key factor to acceptance of this initiative.
An example of a slow onset emergency was given where volunteers may be required
to assist emergency personnel, and the question was posed about the use of
neighbourhood group members as volunteers under the direction of city employees.
Sixty seven percent of respondents supported this idea, with 6.67% rejecting it outright
and 26.66% responding with dont know, indicating they were unsure if they would
utilize them if offered. In another question, respondents were asked if neighbourhood
groups established and maintained a list of items that were owned by individuals in their
neighbourhood who were prepared to allow their use for the greater good during an
emergency, would they look on this positively and entertain the use of these items in the
neighbourhood. Eighty percent responded positively to this, with 20% indicating that
they were outright not in favour of this concept.
Question 2 Effective communications
Is communication effective between the City of Guelph and neighborhood groups?
This question looks at how the EOCG views official communications with
neighbourhood groups and what level of communication the EOCG members are
prepared to support. A question was asked about allowing neighbourhood groups to add
HIRA information, gathered through the HIRA process by the City of Guelph, to be
-
8/6/2019 Version Final Submission to MAD