Vermont Solar Development Pathways Stakeholder Kickoff Meeting March 6, 2014 Montpelier, VT.
-
Upload
hester-tate -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Vermont Solar Development Pathways Stakeholder Kickoff Meeting March 6, 2014 Montpelier, VT.
Vermont Solar Development Pathways
Stakeholder Kickoff MeetingMarch 6, 2014Montpelier, VT
Agenda
1. Welcome, Introductions, Meeting Purpose, 9:00 – 9:15& Stakeholder RolesChristine Donovan, Moderator
2. Project Overview & Objectives 9:15 – 10:00
David Hill, Principal Investigator Damon Lane, Project Manager
Break 10:00 – 10:20
4. Project Essentials 10:20 – 11:45 Angela Crooks , US Department of Energy (by phone) Debra Perry, Institute for Sustainable Communities
Suzanne Elowson, Ethan Goldman, Nick Lange, Carl Linvill, Peter Schneider, Focus Area Leads
5. Looking Forward 11:45 – noonDavid Hill, Principal Investigator
Meeting Purpose
• Introduce key Project Team members
• Orient Stakeholders to the project
• Through discussion and dialogue, obtain stakeholder input on key areas of focus for the project
• Explain next steps and the process from here
The Role of Stakeholders
• Provide input on the strategic direction of the project
• Offer subject matter expertise for key areas of focus
• Help inform project findings and recommendations
• Review and comment on draft deliverables
Vermont Solar Development Pathways
Overview and Objectives
Overview and Objectives
• Project Overview• Solar and Distributed Generation as Key
Elements in Meeting Vermont’s Comprehensive Energy Plan Goals
• Project Objectives • Convene and engage stakeholders to inform
analytically based discussions and report on how Vermont moves from a developed to advanced saturation solar market in the coming decade
• What to be thinking about as we move along• Key opportunities and or barriers• What focus area(s) are of particular interest
Vermont Solar Development Pathways
• Vermont Energy Investment Corporation (VEIC)Competitive solicitation Cooperative Agreement with Department of
Energy 3 years with cost share requirements
• Public Service Department (PSD)Subrecipient, advising on energy scenario
modeling related to CEP and other policy initiatives
• Regulatory Assistance Project (RAP)Subrecipient, leading topic area and analysis of
net metering and alternatives
Stakeholders / Supporters
• Energy Action Network• Green Mountain Power• Lintilhac Foundation• LW Seddon• Lyndon State College• Renewable Energy Vermont• Vermont Conservation Voters• Virginia Lyons• VPIRG• Washington Electric Coop• Wolfe Energy
• AllEarth• ANR• BED, VEC• Conergy• DC Energy
Innovations• Dynapower• Faraday• Green Lantern
Group• groSolar• High Meadows Fund• NESCAUM• NRG• Pomerleau Group• Positive Energy• Solarize Upper
Valley• Suncommon• UVM• VELCO• Vermont Law School• Vermont Solar
Engineering• VHCB• VNRC• Others….
Sun Shot Initiative
• Launched 4 years agoMore than $500 million for 350+ projects
• PV• CSP• Balance of system (soft costs)• Systems integration• Tech to market
Objectives to reduce costs of solar to $0.06 / kWh by 2020
Sun Shot Indicators – Fall 2014GROWING DEPLOYMENT• 15.9 gigawatts of solar power in the United States
Enough to power 3.2 million average American homes
• In 2013, solar was the second-largest source of new electricity generating capacity in the U.S., exceeded only by natural gas
• More solar has been installed in the U.S. in the last 18 months than in the 30 years prior
• Large organizations deploying solar: Apple, Berkshire Hathaway, FedEx, GE, GM, Google, IKEA, Macy’s, Target, Walmart, and the U.S. military.
• A new solar project was installed every 4 minutes in 2013 in America
FALLING COSTS
• Since 2010, the average cost of panels has dropped more than 60% and the cost of a system has dropped by about 50%
• Solar installations are overwhelmingly occurring in middle-class neighborhoods that have median incomes ranging from $40,000 to $90,000 -- over 60% of installations were in such neighborhoods
• Although the cost of solar energy system hardware has dropped significantly, the non-hardware “soft” costs of solar – such as permitting, installation, interconnection, and maintenance fees – remain a major barrier to greater deployment nationwide and can account for up to 64% of total system cost
Sun Shot Indicators – Fall 2014
SOLAR AS AN ECONOMIC ENGINE• Solar jobs have increased nearly 20% since 2012,
which is 10x the national job growth rate. There are more than 140,000 solar workers in the United States, up from 119,016 in 2012.
• The solar industry is making a similar economic impact as other cornerstone American industries. For example, the U.S. iron and steel mill industry employs 86,122 workers.
• In 2013, new U.S. PV installations were valued at $13.7 billion – more than double the $5.5 billion value of installations in 2010.
Sun Shot Indicators – Fall 2014
Scenario testing
Net metering
Electric vehicles
Heat pumps
Smart Grid / DM
Energy storage
Low-income
Incentives / social equity
Goals: 1. A clear and detailed path to 1 GW of solar, contributing to
Vermont’s 90% renewable energy goal2. Sustained engagement and support from diverse groups
across the state
Impacts: 1. Added momentum to the 90% renewable energy goal,
preventing it from falling out of focus, unmet2. Increased agreement among utilities, advocates, and
government on value of solar and its role 3. A documented process replicable in other jurisdictions
SOLAR AND DISTRIBUTED GENERATION AS KEY ELEMENTS IN MEETING VERMONT’S COMPREHENSIVE ENERGY PLAN GOALS
Prime Recipient: Vermont Energy Investment Corporation Principal Investigator: David Hill, Distributed Resources Director, VEIC
Co-Applicants: Regulatory Assistance Project, Vermont Public Service Department
EERE Funds Requested: $518,535Proposed Applicant Cost Match: $141,456Total Project Value: $659,991
Key Idea: A well-coordinated stakeholder engagement process and analysis of well-understood scenarios will create shared understanding and buy-in from many parties. The effort will reveal the contribution of, and effect on, net metering, social equity, incentives, electric vehicles, heat pumps, smart grid, and energy storage, and represent a necessary step toward the State goal.
Summary: Create a shared vision for the most effective ways in which Vermont can reach its legislated goal of meeting 90% of the state’s total energy needs through renewable energy. This project uses a comprehensive stakeholder engagement process, scenario analysis, and a consensus approach to map out a Solar Development Plan.
Outcomes by Year
• 2015: Stakeholder Engagement and Scenario Modeling
• 2016: Stakeholder Engagement, Revised Scenarios
and Vermont’s Solar Pathways Plan
• 2017: Implementation Support
Year 1 Stakeholder Meetings (2015)
• March 6: Vermont College of Fine Arts,Montpelier
Project Introduction and Kickoff
• April 3: Rutland Introduction to Scenarios and Focus Area
Breakouts
• Tentative May 19: Likely Burlington Alpha Scenario Results
• Tentative October 6: Feedback / discussion by groups on revised analyses
• Tentative November 10: Revised scenario results, and priorities for Year 2 (2016)
Year 1 Milestones
• Mid-June1. Alpha scenario results webinar 2. Net metering Focus Area brief, with webinar 3. Other Focus Area briefs, with webinar
• Mid-SeptemberBrief on barriers and integration
• Mid-DecemberRevised scenario, Go / No-Go for Year 2
LEAP System• Long-range Energy Alternatives Planning System
• Developed / maintained by Stockholm Environment Institute
• Decades of application and development in > 190 countries worldwide
• Scenario based – “self consistent story lines of how an energy system might evolve over time” well suited for regional and targeted technology (Solar Development Pathways) analyses
• Transparent accounting framework
Flexible Reporting & Structure for Appropriately Detailed Analyses
Heaps, C.G., 2012. Long-range Energy Alternatives Planning (LEAP) system. [Software version 2014.0.1.20] Stockholm Environment Institute. Somerville, MA, USA. www.energycommunity.org
Analytic Approaches
• Model will be technology honest, but not technology agnostic (solar growing to 20% target)
• Compare to a base scenario informed by Total Energy Study (TREES local, hybrid of biofuel prices) and CEP target
• Solar not in a vacuum; part of total energy economy
• Start at high level; build depth through Focus Areas and stakeholder inputs on scenarios
• Alpha Scenario Focus Area Analyses Integration and Barriers Beta Scenario Priority Analyses Final Scenarios Solar Development Pathways Report Implementation
Vermont Solar Development Pathways
Break
Vermont Solar Development Pathways
Project Essentials
Project Essentials
• DOE and National Coordinator roles• Focus Areas
Introduce leaders and review sample questions
• Topic area scheduling objectives • Communications guidelines
Focus Area Near Term Activities
• April 3 Outline for Focus Area briefFramework (calls, shared documents for
initial solar scenario inputs)
• May 19 (with materials week before meeting)
Draft of Focus Area briefDraft of Alpha Scenario inputs
The Focus Areas
Scenario testing
Net metering
Electric vehicles
Heat pumps
Smart Grid / DM
Energy storage
Low-income
Incentives / social equity
Key Questions for All Focus Areas
• Current market conditions – market share, growth, costs, performance
• Baseline changes, path(s) to meet CEP targets
• Alpha solar development path 1. Key interactions / opportunities with more
advanced solar deployment2. Key regulatory, market, technical, or policy
barriers / drivers
• Other stakeholders we should invite
Focus Area: Incentives – Suzanne Elowson
• Federal tax credit changes• Customer financial analyses• Business models and strategies• Underserved market segments• Renewable Energy Credits (RECs), solar set-
aside• Consistency in face of uncertainty• Stakeholders, key barriers• Other?
Focus Area: Net Metering – Carl Linvill
• What combination of solar installations makes sense? (distributed generation [DG] to utility scale)
• Guidelines and principles for good tariff design• May be complementary to PSB workshop
process in looking at alternatives that support DG but may not be strictly “net metering”
• Consider interaction with process for PSB group
• Other?
Focus Area: Electric Vehicles – David Roberts
• Light-duty vehicles and heavy-duty vehicles (LDV and HDV) market segments
• Trends / changes in modes and vehicle miles traveled (VMT)
• Complementary to solar via storage and / or charging
• Target segments and market uptake strategies
• Other?
Focus Area: Heat Pumps – Peter Schneider
• Load shape• Relation to demand response (DR) / thermal
storage• Thermal shell enhancements• Market share and rates compared to
biomass and non-renewable energy systems• Target segments and market uptake
strategies• Stakeholders, key barriers• Other?
Focus Area: High-Performance Modular Housing
Peter Schneider • Business structure / models• Scale and costs
• Integration of multiple technologies• Solar, heat pumps, demand response,
storage
• Smart inverters
• Integration to other net-zero energy / new construction trends and market
• Code and permitting
• Financing
• Stakeholders, key barriers
• Other?
Focus Area: Smart Grid / Demand Response –Ethan Goldman
• Priority loads and technical options• Business structure / models• Links to forecasting• Links to storage• Standardization • Smart inverters• Stakeholders, key barriers• Other?
Focus Area: Energy Storage – Nick Lange
• Scale and distribution• Mobile and stationary
• Business structure/models• Value chains, load shifting, back up,
ancillary services
• Links to forecasting
• Links to demand response
• Smart inverters
• Stakeholders, key barriers
• Other?
Communications
• Work is on Alpha Scenarios and Focus Area briefs1. Both of these provide foundation for work in
remainder of Year 1 and will inform Year 2 report
2. Work over the next couple months is important but does not “lock down” scenarios, results, or recommendations
3. Comments will be kept and organized
Vermont Solar Development Pathways
Looking Forward
Looking Forward
• Next Meeting - April 3, Rutland• Focus Area calls and activities: Draft outline
and schedule for addressing priority topics • Next meeting: Baseline scenario review, in-
depth Focus Area discussions, breakouts• Stakeholder time tracking
For more information, contact:
• General questions on project: objectives, scope, timing and scenario modeling:• David Hill [email protected] and • Damon Lane [email protected]
• Focus area logistics, issues or topics:• Focus Area Leads – • Suzanne Elwoson: [email protected] • Carl Linvill: [email protected]• David Roberts: [email protected]• Peter Schneider: [email protected]• Ethan Goldman: [email protected]• Nick Lange: [email protected]
Thank You!David Hill(802) [email protected]