Vegetation Trends In Australia Peter Briggs Michael Raupach, Edward King, Michael Schmidt, Matt...
-
Upload
archibald-black -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Vegetation Trends In Australia Peter Briggs Michael Raupach, Edward King, Michael Schmidt, Matt...
Vegetation TrendsIn Australia
Peter BriggsMichael Raupach, Edward King, Michael Schmidt, Matt Paget,
Jenny Lovell, Pep CanadellCSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research
Acknowledgements
Damian Barrett, Susan Campbell, Dean Graetz, Tim McVicar, Udaya Senarath, Stephen Plummer and GlobCarbon (ESA)
Knorr, W., Scholze, M., Gobron, N., Pinty, B., Kaminski, T. (2005). Global scale drought caused atmospheric CO2 increase. EOS 18(18), 178-181.
Trends in fAPAR from SeaWiFS, Oct 1999 to Sep 2003
Decadal Vegetation Greenness TrendsNorthern Hemisphere Change in NDVI
Gains from earlier onset of growing season are almost cancelled out by hotter and drier summers which depress assimilation
Suggests a decreasing net terrestrial C sink
Angert et al. 2005; Dai et al. 2005; Buermann et al. 2005; Courtesy Inez Fung 2005
1980s: d(NDVI)/dt Summer 1982-1991
1990s: d(NDVI)/dt Summer 1994-2002
NDVI AnomalyMonthly 1981-2003
Anomaly as NDVImonth − <NDVImonth> Veg condition relative to
expectations for that time of year "BPAL" AVHRR data series
PAL (Pathfinder AVHRR Land, NASA) dataset 1981-94
CSIRO EOC AVHRR dataset 1992-2003, with BISE filtering and sampling to match PAL
8-11 day max-NDVI composites, aggregated to monthly
No atmos correctionNo BRDF correction“Only a demonstration”
Shows space and time evolution of the drought cycles, e.g.
Droughts 1982-83, 2002-04… Wet La Nina 1988
Less vigour More vigour
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
01
00
02
03
04
05
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Less vigour More vigourNDVI Anomaly 1992-2004
(BPAL + CATS1)
Test marketed on: Scientific colleagues Senior bureaucrats
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
01
00
02
03
04
05
J F M A M J J A S O N D
Less vigour More vigourNDVI Anomaly 1992-2004
(BPAL + CATS1)
Test marketed on: Scientific colleagues Senior bureaucrats
Response :1. “Holy sh…”
2. “Is this real?”
3. “What’s going on?”
0
0 . 1
0 . 2
0 . 3
0 . 4
0 . 5
0 . 6
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
StdDev
NDVI BPAL AVHRR 1982 to 2000
Mean• Rain is main constraint so NDVI follows rain map except:
• Northern tropics: high VPD and strong seasonality of rain limit growth
• Tasmania: light and temp-limited in winter
• Areas of high SD show agricultural cropping zones
• Desert interior: green flush as ephemeral lakes and rivers respond to seasonal runoff from the north
Mean
Std Dev
Confirmation of the 2000-2004 trend in AVHRR NDVI Comparison with
Other AVHRR NDVI treatments NDVI from other sensors Other products from other sensors
How the trend varies with bioclimatic region Comparison of trends within major drainage divisions East Australian drought recovery 2002-2005
Satellite vegetation time series for Australia
AVHRR NDVI BPAL (5 km, 8-11 day max-NDVI composite, BISE-filtered) CATS1 (1 km, ~ 10 day max-NDVI composite, no BRDF, no cloud) CATS2b (= CATS1 with CLAVR cloud clearing) CATS2a (= CATS2b with BRDF correction)
MODIS NDVI SeaWifs NDVI SPOT-Vgt NDVI LAI from GlobCarbon project
SPOT-Vgt, ATSR2/AATSR, MERIS
LAI from MODIS
Converted to
fraction cover fC = 1 ek∙LAI
with k = 0.5
Australia: vegetation greenness trends (1990-2005)
fraction cover fC from GlobCarbon LAI
NDVI: CATS2a(CLAVR, BRDF)
NDVI: MODIS, SeaWiFS, SpotVgt
NDVI: BPAL
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
ND
VI
Australian continent averageNDVI (MODIS)NDVI (AVHRR BPAL)NDVI (AVHRR CATS2a; BRDF)NDVI (SeaWiFS)NDVI (SpotVGT)FC (from GlobCarbon LAI)MODIS FC
ND
VI,
fC
NDVI 1992-2004Murray-Darling Basin
0:Australia1: NE Coast1.1: NE Coast (sea)1.2: NE Coast (Burd-Fitz)2: SE Coast3: Tasmania4: MDB4.1: MDB (wet)4.2: MDB (agric)4.3: MDB (semiarid)5: SA Gulfs6: SW Coast7: Indian Ocean8: Timor Sea9: Carpentaria10: Lake Eyre11: Bulloo-Bancannia12: Western Plateau
16
712
8
9
10
1
4
11
2
3
5
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
ND
VI
4.1: MDB (w et) MODISBPAL CATS1CATS2b CATS2aSeaWiFS SpotVGTGlobCarbFC
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006N
DV
I
4.2: MDB (agric) MODISBPAL CATS1CATS2b CATS2aSeaWiFS SpotVGTGlobCarbFC
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
ND
VI
4.3: MDB (semiarid) MODISBPAL CATS1CATS2b CATS2aSeaWiFS SpotVGTGlobCarbFC
Drought recovery (or not) in SE AustraliaSeaWiFS Fraction Cover for 5 Decembers(NDVI scaled by GlobCarbon FC)
Before Drought Drought Max 6 Months Ago
Marginal country slow to recover(if at all yet)
Before Drought Drought Max 6 Months Ago
Annual Rainfall (mm d-1)
Before Drought Drought Max 6 Months Ago
SeaWiFS
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
GlobCarbonFC
Se
aW
iFS
ND
VI
BPAL
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
GlobCarbonFCB
PA
L N
DV
I
CATS2a
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
GlobCarbonFC
CA
TS
2a
ND
VI
MODIS
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
GlobCarbonFC
MO
DIS
ND
VI
SeaWiFS BPAL
MODISCATS2a
1.1: NE Coast (sea)1.2: NE Coast (Burd-Fitz)2: SE Coast3: Tasmania4.1: MDB (wet)4.2: MDB (agric)4.3: MDB (semiarid)5: SA Gulfs6: SW Coast7: Indian Ocean8: Timor Sea9: Carpentaria10: Lake Eyre11: Bulloo-Bancannia12: Western Plateau
Various NDVIs vs GlobCarbon FCBy Drainage Division, Monthly, 1999-2002
• Up to 36 pts (months) per drainage division
• Periods of known sensor problems removed from AVHRR
• For planned rescaling exercise
Used in previous maps
SeaWiFS
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
GlobCarbonFC
Se
aW
iFS
ND
VI
BPAL
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
GlobCarbonFCB
PA
L N
DV
I
CATS2a
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
GlobCarbonFC
CA
TS
2a
ND
VI
MODIS
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
GlobCarbonFC
MO
DIS
ND
VI
SeaWiFS BPAL
MODISCATS2a
1.1: NE Coast (sea)1.2: NE Coast (Burd-Fitz)2: SE Coast3: Tasmania4.1: MDB (wet)4.2: MDB (agric)4.3: MDB (semiarid)5: SA Gulfs6: SW Coast7: Indian Ocean8: Timor Sea9: Carpentaria10: Lake Eyre11: Bulloo-Bancannia12: Western Plateau
Various NDVIs vs GlobCarbon FCBy Drainage Division, Monthly, 1999-2002
• Well-defined relationship between all sensors
• Saturation of greenness wrt GlobCarbon in all cases
• Only MODIS showing stratification wrt biogeography
Carbon consequences of vegetation greenness changesModel Let biospheric C obey rate equation dC/dt = FC kC, with mean turnover
rate k. If NPP changes suddenly by FC, then while t << 1/k, the change in C is
Assume NPP ~ green leaf cover fraction: Then biospheric C change associated with a perturbation in green leaf
cover is
Numbers Take t = 1 year; FC = 1 GtC/y; fGL/fGL = 0.2 (a low value)
=> C = 0.2 GtC = 0.2 PgC = 200 MtC = 730 Mt CO2
Compare: Australian GHG emissions (2002 NGGI) were 550 Mt CO2eq
C C GL GLF F f f
C GL GLC t F f f
CC t F
Conclusions (1): Trends in vegetation greenness, are they real?
Broad agreement from multiple sensors on Australian vegetation trends Continent-wide decline 2000-2004 Long AVHRR record suggests decline commenced around 1998
Areas of disagreement MODIS and GlobCarbon give substantially different estimates of LAI
(therefore fraction cover) For Australia, GlobCarbon is closer to the level we expect (from
other RS and flux station work) Trend from AVHRR probably too strong; modern sensors (SeaWiFS,
SpotVGT, MODIS) appear to show some recovery not seen in AVHRR.
Due to continued use of at-launch calibrations by AVHRR? Important to continue to follow trends through the recovery
However Areas of agreement are more significant than areas of disagreement
Conclusions (2): What’s going on?
Strongest relative decline occurs in semi-arid zones (rainfall < 600 mm) Declining trends in heavily forested areas not revealed here, but:
Scale, NDVI saturation may be issues See Helen Cleugh for MODIS/flux station results
Trends are too widespread for land use change to be a significant driver But land use (eg. stocking rates in rangeland) may have an effect
Likely drivers: Rainfall: no major floods in most of the country for 10-15 years (until
Cyclone Larry) Warming: 2002-2004 was a hot drought; 2005 hot and a little wetter
Possible contributing processes: Effects of warming and dryness on fire, heterotrophic respiration Soil evaporation (half of Australian ET) is favoured in the competition
for soil water, causing transpiration to fall
Messages
Loss of terrestrial C in 2002-2004 is similar to total anthropogenic Australian GHG emissions
Terrestrial biospheric C is highly dynamic and vulnerable: to drought and probably also to warming
Long term satellite environmental time series are an important tool for examining trends Modern sensors (with their overlap) will be invaluable for
validating and carrying on the series Too soon to say what will happen to continental vegetation next:
Many parts of the country still waiting for drought recovery Warming, associated with drought, is particularly worrying
Is this a foretaste of the future Australia?