Variable Rate Fertilizer at Reduced Scales

15
OSU Precision Sensing Variable Rate Fertilizer at Reduced Scales Randy Taylor Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering Oklahoma State University 2010 NUE Conference Stillwater, OK

description

Variable Rate Fertilizer at Reduced Scales. Randy Taylor Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering Oklahoma State University. 2010 NUE Conference Stillwater, OK. Field Scale Variability. Macro-variability Likely tied to soil type, landscape position, or something else Micro-variability. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Variable Rate Fertilizer at Reduced Scales

Page 1: Variable Rate Fertilizer at Reduced  Scales

OSU

Pre

cisi

on S

ensi

ng

Variable Rate Fertilizer at Reduced Scales

Randy TaylorBiosystems and Agricultural Engineering

Oklahoma State University

2010 NUE ConferenceStillwater, OK

Page 2: Variable Rate Fertilizer at Reduced  Scales

OSU

Pre

cisi

on S

ensi

ng

Field Scale Variability

• Macro-variability– Likely tied to soil type, landscape position, or

something else• Micro-variability

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

App

licat

ion

Rat

e, g

pa

RX_RATERATE

Page 3: Variable Rate Fertilizer at Reduced  Scales

OSU

Pre

cisi

on S

ensi

ng

Variability View from Equipment

• Longitudinal– Down-the-row– Response time issues

• Lateral– Across the boom– Boom divisions

A greater distance between the control and delivery points means a lower resolution and increased scale.

Page 4: Variable Rate Fertilizer at Reduced  Scales

OSU

Pre

cisi

on S

ensi

ngSub-Meter Application System is a Proven Concept

Page 5: Variable Rate Fertilizer at Reduced  Scales

OSU

Pre

cisi

on S

ensi

ng

Liquid Systems

• The initial sub-meter application system met market resistance

• However, sensor based VRA has found commercial success

• Section control systems have also renewed the interest in sub-boom width application

Page 6: Variable Rate Fertilizer at Reduced  Scales

OSU

Pre

cisi

on S

ensi

ng

Accepted Resolution

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

0 20 40 60 80 100

Min

imum

Res

pons

e Tim

e, s

Application Scale, ft

5 mph10 mph15 mphLimit

Page 7: Variable Rate Fertilizer at Reduced  Scales

OSU

Pre

cisi

on S

ensi

ng

Reduced Scale

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

0 5 10 15 20

Min

imum

Res

pons

e Tim

e, s

Application Scale, ft

5 mph10 mph15 mphLimitLimit

Page 8: Variable Rate Fertilizer at Reduced  Scales

OSU

Pre

cisi

on S

ensi

ng

Liquid Systems

• Most commercial rate controllers can be set to about a 2 second response time.

• Multiple control sections will require multiple control valves and possibly flow meters.

• Pulse width modulation and binary valve systems have promise.

Page 9: Variable Rate Fertilizer at Reduced  Scales

OSU

Pre

cisi

on S

ensi

ng

Granular VRT

• Granular distribution/delivery systems follow two basic designs– Gate/belt or chain/spinner– Metering wheel/air boom

• While both systems can be used for variable rate application, reducing the application scale to a partially width is really not feasible

Page 10: Variable Rate Fertilizer at Reduced  Scales

OSU

Pre

cisi

on S

ensi

ng

Spinner Spreaders• Reducing application scales

with spinner spreaders is really not feasible.

• The material is centrally metered and distributed.

• Furthermore, VRA with spinner spreaders is a challenge.– Spread distribution patterns

are typically a function of flow rate onto the spinner

Page 11: Variable Rate Fertilizer at Reduced  Scales

OSU

Pre

cisi

on S

ensi

ng

Air Boom Systems

• The material is centrally metered, but patterns are created locally.

• The primary challenge is lag time from the metering system to the point of application

Page 12: Variable Rate Fertilizer at Reduced  Scales

OSU

Pre

cisi

on S

ensi

ng

Potential Solutions

• The central hopper/conveying system might be a good model to follow

Page 13: Variable Rate Fertilizer at Reduced  Scales

OSU

Pre

cisi

on S

ensi

ng

Section Control System Speed

Page 14: Variable Rate Fertilizer at Reduced  Scales

OSU

Pre

cisi

on S

ensi

ng

Rate Controllers and Tuning

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0NDVI

Pres

crip

tion,

GPA 1 gpa/0.05 NDVI

2.5 gpa/0.05 NDVI

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

App

licat

ion

Rat

e, G

PA

RX_RATERATE

• Prescriptions should not be developed without considering rate controller performance.

• Worry about the macro variability within the field.

• Are you capturing the general trend?

Page 15: Variable Rate Fertilizer at Reduced  Scales

OSU

Pre

cisi

on S

ensi

ng

Randy [email protected]

405-744-5431

Questions