Valorisation of tomato processing by-product by extraction ...
Transcript of Valorisation of tomato processing by-product by extraction ...
1
Valorisation of tomato processing by-product by extraction of an
oleoresin rich in lycopene
Matilde de Portugal da Silveira Henriques de Freitas1, José Santos1, Renato Carvalho 1Instituto Superior Técnico, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal
Abstract
The main goal of this work was to study and evaluate the feasibility of the extraction of a lycopene rich
oleoresin from the by-product of the tomato processing industry. The physicochemical characterization of the
by-product (tomato pomace) and of the resulting extracts was conducted.
The available drying technologies were assessed, in order to achieve biological stabilization. An industrial dryer
was selected taking into consideration the pomace analysis results and the end-product specifications. After
careful examination of the supplier’s proposals for this equipment (suppliers A, B and C), the technical-
economical assessment of the investment was calculated, considering the proposal of the supplier A.
For economic evaluation, three scenarios were considered to estimate economic indicators. For the pessimistic
scenario, it was obtained an internal income tax (IRR) of 11% and a payback-time of 3 years. For the
intermediate scenario, the payback-time is 2 years and the IRR is 53%. For an optimistic scenario, the IRR is
308% and the investment is replaced in the first year of production.
Key-words: tomato, pomace, lycopene, oil, oleoresin, industrial dryer, extraction, extract
1. Introduction
Tomato pomace
Tomato is one of the most important crops in the
world, with an annual production estimated at 182
million tonnes per year (Food and Agricultural
Organization, 2017). Though it is widely consumed
as a fresh fruit, around one third of tomato
consumption is through processed products such
as tomato paste, tomato sauces, ketchup, etc. (Ries
et al., 1962). The revenue for the tomato
processing industry was evaluated at 5.2 billion
USD in 2017/118. (Tomato News, 2019)
The processing of tomato consists in the removal
of seeds, skins and any other hard substances.
Thus, the transformation process results in a by-
product called pomace that makes up to 2-13% of
the ripe tomato (Del Valle et al., 2006; Ventura et
al., 2009). The composition of tomato pomace
varies according to the cultivar, processing
parameters and location. Although it is currently
used as animal feed, tomato pomace represents an
underrated source for added value components.
The seeds have a considerable fat content for
vegetable oil extraction and the skins are
extremely rich in lycopene (Del Valle et al., 2006).
Lycopene
Lycopene is a red pigment carotenoid with health-
related benefits (Story et al., 2013; Gajowik et al.,
2016). It has a great antioxidant activity and a
crucial role in the biosynthesis of other
carotenoids. Over the last few years, the demand
for organic lycopene has grown due to its
anticancer, anti-inflammatory and radio protective
properties (Del Valle et al., 2006). Lycopene
(C40H56) is an unsaturated hydrocarbon, with 11
conjugated and 2 unconjugated bonds. Because of
its non-polar nature, it is insoluble in water and
soluble in organic solvents such as acetone, hexane
and petroleum ether.
2
Figure 1 – Molecular structure of lycopene isomers.
The market for lycopene rich products comprises
the food, cosmetic and pharmaceutical industries
(Carotenoids Market Size, Share & Trends, Global
Industry Report, 2025). Most common
formulations include oleoresins, crystals or
powders. Oleoresin is widely available since lipid
solubilisation enhances its bioavailability (Zelka et
al., 2001).
The red pigment accounts for approximately 80-
90% of all carotenoids in tomatoes. Lycopene is a
light and heat sensitive molecule, very susceptible
to degradation. It can assume cis and trans
configurations. The first has a greater
bioavailability and solubility and the second is
more stable (Benítez et al., 2018). In the fresh fruit,
trans configuration is more predominant but
transformation processes enhance the
isomerization to cis (Honeste et al., 2011). High
temperatures, inherent in many industrial
bioprocesses, like bleaching, pasteurization,
cooking, frying, preserving, drying and dehydration
are proven to catalyse these reactions (Xianquan et
al., 2005).
Given its economic interest for numerous
industries, studies have been conducted to
optimize the extraction from residues of tomato
production. Extraction of lycopene from tomato
pomace or skins only, with organic solvents is the
most popular method, leading to high recovery
yields. The optimization of extraction parameters
such as solvent choice, particle size, temperature,
extraction time and the existence of pre-treatment
processes, has been investigated by several
authors. Although several methods and extraction
operating conditions are described in the
literature, it is not possible to compare data due to
a wide range of parameters affecting the results.
Variants as the origin of the pomace, the solvent
choice, time, temperature and quantification
method prevent proper comparison of values.
In addition to extensive attempts to optimize
extraction operative conditions, many have sought
to apply pre-treatment processes to tomato
pomace. The results obtained by Zuorro et al.
(2011) support the use of cell degrading enzymes
for greater lycopene recovery. Seher et al. (2013)
and Biosci et al. (2015) determined that for
extraction with ultrasounds during extraction
require less time, lower temperature and smaller
amount of solvent than a conventional organic
solvent extraction. Ho et al. (2015) verified higher
lycopene yields by extracting tomato skins with
microwaves. Domingues (2009) reports that a pre-
treatment of extrusion followed by milling
increases the total extraction yield by 9.8%, for
hexane extraction.
Due to the disadvantages of toxicity and pollution
associated with organic solvents in industry,
extraction with supercritical fluids have gained a
widespread. When comparing repair extraction by
Soxhlet method with hexane and supercritical CO2
extraction, Domingues (2009) found that the mass
extraction yield was higher for extracts obtained
with supercritical CO2, but that the lycopene
concentration was lower. Several authors have
investigated supercritical extraction; however, the
process requires the installation of expensive
equipment due to high pressures (Nobre et al.,
2012).
Oil extraction
The present study focused on the feasibility of
extraction of an oleoresin, from tomato pomace, in
an oilseed processing factory. The process
implemented is optimized for rapeseed and
soybean seeds and can be divided into four key
steps:
Seed cleaning and preparation
Oil extraction (mechanical and/or
chemical)
3
Treatment of oil/hexane miscella
Treatment of the meal
A proper preparation of the seeds is crucial to have
a successful extraction. The material’s water
content should be between 10 – 13 % (w/w) in
order to prevent deterioration and allow the
highest extraction yield (Young et al., 1994). There
is a cleaning system to remove any unwanted
foreign matter or dust, usually by sieving. For
bigger seeds, there is a milling step. After there is
conditioning, rolling process and mechanical
pressing or extrusion. To ensure percolation of the
solvent in the seeds, the material needs to be
porous, spongy and permeable. The purpose of
extrusion and pressing is to increase the surface
area and decrease the bulk density. For a good
diffusion of the solvent, the consistency of the
solids should not be too dry and granular or too
compact and wet. If this diffusion is impaired, the
solvent hold-up will increase and can originate
problems in the extraction equipment (Mulder et
al., 2011).
Extraction occurs due to successive washing of the
solids with hexane and the resulting miscella is
treated in a distillation column. The meal goes
through a Desolventizer-Toaster-Dryer (DTD) and
the hexane is partly recycled.
Industrial Dryers
Water removal from solid materials is necessary
for several reasons: reducing transportation costs,
ease sample handling, storage and achieve product
specifications. The pomace exiting the tomato
processing plant contains a high moisture content
(60 - 90% w/w), that should be reduced to 8 - 10%
(w/w) in order to achieve biological stabilization
and maximum extraction yield.
Since the separation of tomato juice from the skins
and seeds is done continuously and discharges a
high solids flow rate, the mode of operation needs
to be continuous.
The drying process should have a high evaporation
rate, be adequate for granular and friable solids,
and provide a moderate agitation of the product.
Following literature review, the most suitable
industrial dryers for this purpose are the rotary
cylinder, the tubular bundle and the fluidized bed
dryer.
The rotary cylinder dryer is widely used in the
industry due to its high evaporation rates. The
equipment is a cylinder tank that rotates with a
slight slope to promote material flow by gravity.
The injection of a hot air stream promotes a direct
heat exchange with the material (Mujumdar, A.,
Osman, P., 2006).
The tubular bundle dryer is a configuration of the
rotary cylinder. It has a similar outer shell, but the
heat transfer is indirect through several interior
bundles where the heating agent circulates.
Fluid bed drying is extensively used in the
pharmaceutical industry, to reduce moisture
content of powders and granulates. The
equipment works through the flow fluidization
principle. The solids or pastes enter a chamber
with a perforated surface. Tot air is inserted
through the holes at high pressures to promote
drying.
Pomace fractions separation
The disparity in the chemical composition of the
seeds and skins constituting the pomace, suggests
distinct valorisation potentials.
The approaches to skin and seed separation can be
divided into wet or dry separation. The principle
for wet separation involves the mixing water to
promote skin fluctuation and seed sedimentation
based on the density of the components. Kaur et
al. (2005) developed a flotation-sedimentation
system that allows a separation efficiency of
69.17% for seeds and 48.29% for skins. Shao et al.
(2013) stated that by adding a second float-
sedimentation tank the separation efficiency can
reach 90%. For dry separation it is necessary to
dehydrate the pomace before. Methods for
recovering seeds and skins include sieving,
fluidized bed separators and/or cyclones, based on
the difference in particle size density. Shao et al.
(2015) state a recovery efficiency of 68.56% and a
purity of 82.20% and 86.11% for skins and seeds,
respectively.
Objective
4
The present work had an experimental component
in order to investigate the physical characteristics
of tomato pomace, the simulation of some
potentially critical aspects of the extraction in the
oilseed extraction plant and determination of
lycopene content in the resulting oleoresin.
2. Materials and methods
Sample and reagents
The pomace was generously supplied a tomato
processing company. The material was frozen for
ten months at -15oC. Fresh samples from this
year’s harvest were also analysed. The petroleum
ether for extractions and dilutions was from CARLO
ERBA Reagents.
Analytical procedures
Moisture content was determined by the drying
oven method, at 103±2oC. A sample of 5±0.01g was
weighted in a METTLER TOLEDO analytical balance
and placed in a Heraus oven until constant weight.
The drying curve was drawn by periodic weightings
of the pomace at 103±2oC through time. The
effects of sample agitation were assessed. The
drying temperature was chosen according to
literature data, indicating less than 10% lycopene
degradation at 110oC and no variation detected at
80oC (Singh et al., 2015; Zanoni et al., 1998; Zanoni
et al., 2000).
Bulk density was determined by the empiric
formula by weighting a sample in a graduated
beaker. The seeds, skins and fibres ratios were
determined by manual separation and weighting of
the resulting fractions. Particle size distribution
was obtained by sieving methods, in an Endecotts
12 sieve system.
The dry and wet pomace was subjected to
microbiological analysis to investigate the presence
of Salmonella bacteria. The tests were repeated
periodically over 5 months using a 1-2 Test kit from
Millipore.
A dry separation method was developed. An
elutriation system was built with an acrylic tube
and an air stream regulation system. The airstream
flow is necessary to calculate the fluid velocity (eq.
1) and achieve separation through difference in the
particle’s linear velocity (4). The airflow can be
estimated through Bernoulli’s Principle for fluid
dynamics (eq. 2 and 3).
𝑄𝑎𝑖𝑟 = 𝑣1 × 𝐴1 = 𝑣2 × 𝐴2 (1)
𝑃1 +1
2 𝜌𝑣1
2 + ℎ1 = 𝑃2 +1
2 𝜌𝑣2
2 + ℎ2 (2)
After some arrangements the following equation is
obtained:
𝑄 = 𝐴𝑜𝐶𝑓√2∆𝑃
𝜌 (3)
𝑃 – Pressure (bar)
𝜌 – Fluid density (kg/m3)
𝑣 – Fluid velocity (m/s)
ℎ – Elevation (m)
𝐴𝑜 – Orifice area (m2)
𝐶𝑓 – Drag coefficient
The rolling process was simulated in a Brabender
rolling mill, model PM-2000. The rotation velocity
was set at 25 rpm and the heating at 90oC. The
seed thickness was measured with a digital caliper
from POWERFIX.
The extrusion was achieved with a Brabender
equipment model D-4100. The operation
conditions were adjusted to replicate the factory
equipment.
The permeability tests were performed according
to a supplier’s method and are confidential. The
results are presented as the necessary time for a
certain amount of solvent to pass through a solids
layer.
The mass recovery yield was determined by
Soxhlet extraction according to the Portuguese
Norm NP EN ISO 659:1998, with petroleum ether,
at 103±2oC for 6 hours.
Extractions in Soxtec equipment were also
performed. The equipment was from FOSS, model
2050 SOXTEC Auto Extraction Unit. The chosen
program has the total duration of 70 minutes at
135oC.
For the determination of lycopene content in the
extract a UV-Vis method was developed. The
5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 200 400 600
% H
2O
(w
/w)
time (min)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
% (
w/w
)
Mesh opening (mm)
Figure 2 - Size distribution for pomace particles, obtained by sieving.
maximum wavelength, 𝜆𝑚𝑎𝑥, was obtained after
analysis of a diluted sample in a
spectrophotometer from Thermo ScientificTM
,
model MultiskanTM
GO. The value for molar
extinction coefficient was determined from a
calibration curve obtained by dissolving an extract
in petroleum ether. The lycopene concentration
was then calculated using the Lambert-Beer Law
(eq. 4).
𝐴 = 𝜀𝑏𝐶 (4)
𝐴 - Absorbance
𝜀 – Molar extinction coefficient (L.M-1.cm-1)
𝑏 – Optical path length (cm)
𝐶 – Concentration (Molar)
The meal obtained after Soxtec extraction and the
permeability tests was characterized for fibre (NP
EN 806868), protein (NP EN ISO 5983-2), moisture
(ME 20.04), residual oil (NP EN ISO 659:1998) and
ash content (NP ISO 5984). The results for the
analysed meal parameters were introduced in a
NIR equipment (FOSS) to initiate the calibration of
the method.
3. Results
The initial moisture content was determined by
equation 5. The drying curves are shown in Figure
2. By agitating the sample, the necessary time to
achieve 8 – 10 % H2O (w/w) decreased by 100 min.
%𝐻2𝑂 =𝑚 𝑖− 𝑚 𝑓
𝑚 𝑖× 100 = 59.9 ± 0.45 % (𝑤/𝑤) (5)
The average mass percentages for the ratios were
67% for the seeds, 33% for the skins and 1.5% for
fibres and others.
The results for bulk density are shown in Table 1.
Table 1 – Densities obtained for several pomace samples.
Description ρ (kg/m3)
Wet pomace 168.81 ± 3.39
Dry pomace (67% skins) 96.85 ± 0.96
Dry pomace (50% skins) 100.29 ± 1.99
Dry pomace (33% skins) 105.84 ± 1.96
Dry pomace (6% skins) 336.45 ± 2.72
The size distribution obtained for the pomace
particles is in the histogram of Figure 3. It was
verified that the seeds are retained between the
sieves with mesh opening of 1.41 and 3.36 mm.
All the results of the analysis for Salmonella
detection were negative. Please note that the
presence of other microorganisms was not
investigated.
The terminal velocities for the seeds (0.734 m/s)
and skins (1.958 m/s) of the pomace were
obtained by equation 10 after rearrangement of
equations 6, 7, 8 and 9.
𝐹𝑎 = 𝑃 − 𝐼 (6)
�⃗� = 𝑚. 𝑔 = 4
3𝜋𝑟3. 𝑔 =
𝜋𝐷3
6. 𝜌𝑔 (7)
Figure 3 - Drying curves for tomato pomace in oven at 1032oC, with (•) and without agitation (•).
6
33% skins 50% skins
68 % skins
6% skins
68% skins (powder)
Reference
0 20 40 60 80
Per
mea
bili
ty v
elo
city
(m
3 /(m
2.h
)
(% skins (w/w)
Figure 4 - Results for the permeability velocity.
𝐼 = 𝜌𝑓 𝑉 𝑔 =𝜋𝐷3
6𝜌𝑓𝑔 (8)
𝐹𝑎⃗⃗ ⃗ = 𝑓 ×
1
2𝜌𝑢2 × 𝐴𝑝 (9)
𝑢𝑚 = √4 (𝜌𝑓−𝜌)𝑔 𝐷
3 𝜌 𝑓 (10)
𝐹𝑎 – drag force (kg.m.s-2
)
𝑃 – Weight force (kg.m.s-2)
𝐼 – Buoyancy force (kg.m.s-2)
𝑚 – Particle mass (kg)
𝑔 – Acceleration force, 9.8 m2/s
𝐷, 𝑟 – Diameter and radius(m)
𝜌, 𝜌𝑓 – Fluid and particle density (kg/m3)
𝑉 – Particle volume (m3)
𝑢, 𝑢𝑚 – Linear velocity of the particle (m/s)
𝐴𝑝 – Particle superficial area (m2)
𝑓 – Drag coefficient
After conducting a series of tests with the
elutriation tube, it was verified that the skins break
into smaller particles, forming a thin powder. This
powder’s linear velocity (0.791 m/s) was calculated
using equation 10. The velocity of the air flowrate
was set between 0.64 and 1.10 m/s.
The linear velocities for skins (powder form) and
seeds are very close, thus the separation through
fluidization was not achieved. Despite this, after
the elutriation step, it was possible to separate the
seeds from skins using sieve equipment.
The mil rolling resulted in a 42% seed thickness
reduction. The extrusion allowed a compaction
comparable to the industrial process.
For the permeability test, several ratios of seeds
and skins were analysed in order to verify if the
drainage of the extractor is enough. The results for
the velocities obtained are in Figure 4. All the
samples, except one, show a higher velocity than
the internal reference. The sample that showed a
lower velocity had the same skins percentage as
the original pomace exiting the tomato processing
but was replaced for powder skins instead of the
original granulometry.
The mass recovery yield, obtained with Soxhlet
extraction for the samples with different skins ratio
are presented in Table 2.
Table 2 – Mass recovery yields obtained for pomace samples with different ratios of skins and seeds.
% skins (w/w) Mass recovery yield (gext/gpomace)
68 0.102 50 0.124 33 0.137 6 0.269
The absorbance spectrum of the extracts shows
three peaks (418, 467 and 499 nm). The peak
chosen for spectrophotometric analysis was 467
nm. The molar extinction coefficient determined
by the calibration curve for the lycopene in the
extract matrix was 1.64 x 105L.M-1.cm-1. The value
is coherent with the literature.
The lycopene concentrations in the extracts are
presented in Table 3. The results indicate that the
lycopene concentration is higher for samples with
a greater skin mass percentage. The Soxtec
extraction had considerably higher lycopene
content, probably due to the reduced heat
exposure time. The effects of different storage
conditions of dry pomace, absence or presence of
light and room temperature or 4oC are also shown
in the same table. The degradation of lycopene
due to light and heat exposure is evident.
The quality parameters for the Soxtec extraction
resulting meal were introduced in the NIR
calibration program. The calibration was obtained
for five parameters (water content, residual oil,
fibre, protein and ashes) with ten samples. After
7
calibration a new sample was introduced in the
equipment and the values obtained with the
calibration equations were compared with the
laboratory results. The relative errors for these
results are presented in Table 4.
Table 4 - Relative errors of the calibration curve obtained by NIR spectrum analysis, with ten samples.
Water content
(%)
Residual oil (%)
Fibre (%)
Protein (%)
Ashes (%)
21.13 42.30 4.97 9.24 7.17
Aiming to minimize the relative error of the
calibration curves, the values for four more
samples were introduced in the program. The
errors of the results obtained by the calibration
curve decreased substantially (Table 5).
Table 5 - Relative errors of the calibration curve obtained by NIR spectrum analysis, with fourteen samples.
Water content
(%)
Residual oil (%)
Fibre (%)
Protein (%)
Ashes (%)
10.71 6.47 4.89 4.37 3.65
4. Discussion
4.1 Dryer Selection
From the results obtained for the drying curve it is
concluded that for a more efficient and
homogeneous heat transfer, material agitation is
required. Agitation of the pomace also prevents
agglomeration. In the elutriation tests carried out,
it was verified that dry skins are very friable and
breakable, and are reduced to powder, when in
contact with high air flowrates. According to the
permeability tests it was established that the
presence of fines and small particles is highly
adverse for the extraction process, decreasing the
permeability velocity of the solvent, likely to cause
drainage problems.
The installation of the dryer must be done at the
premises the tomato processing factory. Due to
the seasonality of the campaign and subsequent
processing of the tomato, it would be beneficial to
install the dryer in the oil extraction company and
investigate the use of other agricultural wastes
with an unmatched harvest season. However,
there were no agribusiness companies in the
proximities with by-products of interest. If it is
decided to buy repairs from other companies, the
processing time is coincident so the sizing of the
dryer would be another, more expensive and
larger. In addition to these factors, the
transportation cost would be much higher due to
the weight inflated by the high water content.
Several suppliers were contacted and the received
proposals analysed. The proposal A was for a
tubular bundle dryer, the proposal B was for a
fluidized bed dryer and proposal C was for a rotary
cylinder dryer. For the selection, several factors
were considered, bearing in mind the
characteristics of the pomace analysed, and the
features of the types of dryers considered. A
weighting factor between 1 and 10 was assigned to
each criteria (Table 6) to assess the received
proposals:
1. Investment and installation cost
2. Utilities consumption
3. Electricity consumption
4. Maintenance/Cleaning
mglycopene/100goleor
Fresh pomace Soxtec
68% skins (w/w) 112.0
Fresh pomace Soxhlet
6% skins (w/w) 4.1
33% skins (w/w) 48.0
50% skins (w/w) 62.1
6 % skins (w/w) 85.2
Frozen pomace Soxhlet
6% skins (w/w) 3.7
33% skins (w/w) 24.7
50% skins (w/w) 48.9
68% skins (w/w) 59.4
68% skins (w/w), 5-month storage, 4oC
absence of light 63.0
68% skins (w/w), 5-month storage, room temperature, absence
of light
35.4
68% skins (w/w), 5-month storage, room
temperature, presence of light
20.9
Table 3 - Lycopene concentration on the resulting extracts.
8
5. Process continuity
6. Robustness
7. Process flexibility
8. Area required for instalment
9. End-product specifications and quality
10. Moderate and effective agitation
11. Evaporation rate
12. Adequate for heat sensitive products
13. Unit assembly and installation
Table 6 - Weighting factors assigned to each criteria for ranking the drying technologies under study.
Criteria Weighting
factor Proposal
A Proposal
B Proposal
C
1 9 10 7 1
2 8 1 1 10
3 6 10 1 3
4 8 6 1 10
5 10 10 2 10
6 6 8 5 10
7 7 8 1 10 8 8 6 1 6
9 7 10 7 8
10 9 10 1 4
11 8 10 1 8
12 8 10 10 10
13 5 10 5 1
Total score
99 828 321 706
Proposal A
The dryer proposed by supplier A is a tubular
bundle dryer, with indirect heat transfer. The pipes
are arranged in a star configuration supported by
an axial rotating shaft in the centre of the cylinder.
The heating agent is saturated steam. The
equipment includes a cyclone for water and dust
removal. This removal is achieved with a moderate
air stream, which suggests minimum skins
breakage. It also has fire prevention equipment,
ensuring the safety of the process. The investment
cost is the lowest of the three proposals and the
utility costs only slightly higher.
Since the heat supply is indirect and the steam and
fines removal rate is moderate, this is the most
favourable alternative for drying.
Proposal B
Proposal B is the fluidized bed type. Combustion
gases, from a burner, are injected through a
perforated surface. This dryer separates the skins
from the seeds and has the lowest evaporation
rate (as it has no capacity for drying the removed
skins). The supplier suggests total skin separation,
achieved by incorporating two cyclones. The area
required for the fluidization chamber and the two
cyclones is too high, a limiting factor at the factory.
The supplier recommends reuse of skins by
incorporation into pastes and sauces as a
thickening agent. However, this system is not
permitted by the tomato processing factory quality
and legal specifications.
Proposal C
The proposal from supplier C is a rotary cylinder
dryer. Heat transfer is direct and is achieved by
passing a flue gas stream at high counter current
temperatures.
Typical speeds for this type of dryer are around 3
m/s for co-current and 2 m/s counter current
dryers. These speeds translate into very high gas
flow rates, higher than those used in the
elutriation process. The probability of breaking the
skins and forming very small particles is very high.
This criteria is crucial, as it was verified in the
permeability tests that the formation of fines is
highly unfavourable for the process.
This dryer, despite having slightly lower operating
costs, has higher investment costs. Before the
development of this project, drying was done with
a dryer of this type. However, the risk of fire was
very high and the selling price of the dried pomace
was very low as it was intended for animal feed.
Decision
With the results obtained, concerning the
characterization of tomato pomace, and the
reproduction of the pre-treatment existing in
oilseed extraction company, the necessary
conditions for the decision of the dryer were met.
Mandatory criteria for selection are process
continuity, moderate agitation of the material so
as not to create fines but also no agglomeration,
reduced plant space, operating costs and
investment value, lycopene degradation, water
evaporation rate and the volumetric capacity
appropriate to the process.
9
From the analysis of Table 6 and data collected in
the experimental part, it was concluded that the
most appropriate proposal was from supplier A, a
tubular bundle dryer.
5. Economical analysis
To analyse the economic viability of the project
some assumptions were made:
Investment in dryer of proposal A
Investment in a cleaning system
Investment in three heat recovery systems to
increase steam output from boilers
Transportation and installation costs of
industrial equipment (dryer, cleaning system
and three heat recovery units) calculated using
literature factors (Walas et al., 2012)
Consumption of utilities are identical to those
discriminated by supplier A
Utility prices are internal values
Shipping costs from B to A are internal values
For processing operating costs were
considered internal values
The extraction process yield was the average
yield of the oilseed extraction factory
The oil degumming process was not
considered (crude oil)
Taxes - 21%
Cash flow update rate - 10%
Price of meal obtained by interpolation of the
prices of soybean and rapeseed, in relation to
the protein content
Lifetime of purchased industrial equipment is
8 years
Three scenarios were considered:
1st
scenario - the minimum price of the
oleoresin for a payback time of 3 years, was
calculated using the Solver function of
Microsoft Excel (pessimistic)
2nd scenario – the price for the oleoresin was
considered to be identical to price market of
olive oil
3rd
scenario – the market value of the
oleoresin was accounted as 10% of the selling
price of tomato seed oil
Table 7 - Economic indicators resulting from the 8 year economical analysis for three scenarios.
1st
scenario
2nd
scenario
3rd
scenario
Payback-time (years)
3 2 1
Investment Return Rate (IRR)
11% 53% 308%
Economic valuation is a very important segment in
determining the feasibility of implementing
industrial equipment. The data presented was
based on estimates and therefore do not
accurately represent reality.
From the results of the economic analysis
presented, it is concluded that the project allows
the valorisation of a by-product, with reasonable
payback-time and that it is an attractive
investment with low associated risks.
6. Conclusions
The main objective of this work was to study the
suitability of the extraction process of a by-product
of a tomato processing company, in the facilities of
a plant optimized for the extraction of oilseeds.
After extensive review of the laboratory results it
was possible to scrutinize the proposals of the
three dryer suppliers contacted. It was concluded
that the steam tube dryer (proposal A) was the
best option. As the current steam production is
limiting, the implementation of heat recovery
plants in three of the installed boilers was
considered. In order to ensure the safety and
efficiency of the process, it was considered
installation of a pre-cleaning system for the dried
pomace.
The rolling and extrusion steps allowed simulating
the pre-treatment installed at the seed processing
factory. The permeability tests with tomato
pomace (68% w/w skins) indicate sufficient
drainage in the extractor. The extractions and
subsequent mass yield and lycopene analysis
indicate that is possible to achieve a high value
product with considerable recovery yield from an
unused by-product.
The economic analysis, although many
assumptions have been considered, made possible
10
to calculate indicators of project viability. For the
three scenarios studied, payback time and internal
rate of return (IRR) values were considered
attractive for the project progress. For the
pessimistic scenario an IRR of 11% and a 3 year
payback time were obtained, for the intermediate
scenario the IRR was 53% and the payback time is
2 years and for the optimistic scenario the payback
time was in the first year and the IRR obtained was
308%.
7. References Benítez, J. J., Castillo, P. M., del Río, J. C., León-
Camacho, M., Domínguez, E., Heredia, A., Heredia-Guerrero, J. A. (2018). Valorization of Tomato Processing by-Products: Fatty Acid Extraction and Production of Bio-Based Materials. Materials, 11(11), 2211. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11112211
Biosci, I. J., Arabani, A. A., Hosseini, F., & Anarjan, N. (2015). Pretreatment and extraction of oil from seeds of tomato pomace using ultrasound. International Journal of Biosciences (IJB), 6(1), 261–268. https://doi.org/10.12692/ijb/6.1.261-268
Carotenoids Market Size, Share & Trends | Global Industry Report, 2025, retrieved from: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/carotenoids-market Accessed: 2019-10-24
Del Valle, M., Camara, M. & Torija, M. E. (2006). Chemical characterization of tomato pomace. J. Sci. Food Agr., 86 (8): 1232-1236.
Domingos, S. F. S., (2009) Valorização do Tomate: Extração supercrítica de compostos bioactivos a partir de repiso de tomate. Mestre em Engenharia Alimentar. Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Lisboa 2009
Food and Agriculture Organization (2009). Food and Agricultural commodities production. Retrieved from: http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx. Acessed: 27 / 05 / 2019.
Gajowik, A., & Małgorzata M. D., (2014) Lycopene – Antioxidant with radioprotective and anticancer properties. a review. National Institute of Public Health.
Ho, K. K. H. Y., Ferruzzi, M. G., Liceaga, A. M., & San Martín-González, M. F. (2015). Microwave-assisted extraction of lycopene in tomato peels: Effect of extraction conditions on all-trans and cis-isomer yields. LWT Food Science and Technology, 62(1), 160–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2014.12.061
Honest, K. N., Zhang, H. W., & Zhang, L. (2011). Lycopene: Isomerization effects on bioavailabilit and bioactivity properties. Food Reviews International, 27(3), 248–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2011.563392
Mujumdar, A., & Osman, P. (2006). Handbook of industrial drying. Taylor & Francis Group, 1–1312.
Mulder, W. et al. (2011) Advanced Oil Crop Biorefineries. Advanced Oil Crop Biorefineries (Royal Society of Chemistry, 2011). doi:10.1039/9781849732734
Nobre, B. P., Gouveia, L., Matos, P. G. S., Cristino, A. F., Palavra, A. F., & Mendes, R. L. (2012). Supercritical extraction of lycopene from tomato industrial wastes with ethane. Molecules, 17(7), 8397–8407. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17078397
Ries, S. K., and Stout, B.A. (1962). Bulk handling studies with mechanically harvested tomatoes. Proceedings of the American Society Horticultural Science 81, 479.
Shao, D., Atungulu, G. G., Pan, Z., Yue, T., Zhang, A., & Li, X. (2012). Study of Optimal Extraction Conditions for Achieving High Yield and Antioxidant Activity of Tomato Seed Oil. Journal of Food Science, 77(8), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02804.x
Singh, A., Singh, J., Samsher, Singh, Y., & Shalini. (2016). A review on bed drying by different methods with pretreatments. Annals of Biology, 32(1), 78–85.
Story, E. N. Rachel E. Kopec, Steven J. Schwartz, G. Keith Harris, Annual Revision Food Science Technology (2013). An Update on the Health Effects of Tomato Lycopene, Manuscrito do autor, publicado em: Annual Revision Food Science Technology, 2010; 1: 10.1146/annurev.food.102308.124120. doi: 10.1146/annurev.food.102308.124120 PMCID: PMC3850026
Tomato News. from: http://www.tomatonews.com/en/background_47.html accessed 05-03-2019
Ventura, M. R., Pieltin, M. C. & Castanon, J. I. R., (2009). Evaluation of tomato crop by-products as feed for goats. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 154 (3-4): 271-275
Xianquan, S., Shi, J., Kakuda, Y., & Yueming, J. (2005). Stability of Lycopene During Food Processing and Storage. Journal of Medicinal Food, 8(4), 413–422. doi:10.1089/jmf.2005.8.413
Zanoni, B., Peri, C., Nani, R., & Lavelli, V. (1998). Oxidative heat damage of tomato halves as
11
affected by drying. Food Research International, 31(5), 395–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-9969(98)00102-1
Zelkha, M., Nir, Z., & Sedlov, T. (2001). Carotenoid composition and method for protecting skin. WO 03/041678
Zuorro, A., Fidaleo, M., & Lavecchia, R. (2011). Enzyme-assisted extraction of lycopene from tomato processing waste. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 49(6-7), 567–573. doi:10.1016/j.enzmictec.2011.04.020