V UMBER S ISSN 82248250 - WordPress.com · 2016-08-11 · Environmental Ethics.” He argues that...

24
1 ISEE Newsletter Summer 2015 Surfer Dede Surinaya catches a wave in a remote but garbagecovered bay on Java, Indonesia, the world’s most populated island. Photo: © Zak Noyle INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS NEWSLETTER V OLUME 25, NUMBER 2 SUMMER 2015 ISSN 82248250

Transcript of V UMBER S ISSN 82248250 - WordPress.com · 2016-08-11 · Environmental Ethics.” He argues that...

Page 1: V UMBER S ISSN 82248250 - WordPress.com · 2016-08-11 · Environmental Ethics.” He argues that classic sentimentalism rather than neo sentimentalism provides the best grounding

1 ISEE Newsletter ­ Summer 2015

Surfer Dede Surinaya catches a wave in a remote but garbage­covered bay on Java,Indonesia, the world’s most populated island. Photo: © Zak Noyle

INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR

ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS

NEWSLETTER

VOLUME 25, NUMBER 2SUMMER 2015ISSN 8224­8250

Page 2: V UMBER S ISSN 82248250 - WordPress.com · 2016-08-11 · Environmental Ethics.” He argues that classic sentimentalism rather than neo sentimentalism provides the best grounding

ADVANCING THE FIELD OFENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS ANDPHILOSOPHY SINCE 1990

PRESIDENTPHIL CAFARO

VICE­PRESIDENTBENJAMIN HALE

SECRETARYWILLIAM GROVE­FANNING

TREASURERALLEN THOMPSON

NEWSLETTER EDITORMatt Ferkany

WEBSITE MANAGERAline Ramos

2ISEE Newsletter ­ Summer 2015

IN THIS ISSUE

General announcements 3

Member news 4

News from the field 7

Biodiversity and Environmental Ethicists 9as Educators: An Interview with PhilCafaro

New publications: Journals 15

ISEE business 21

Page 3: V UMBER S ISSN 82248250 - WordPress.com · 2016-08-11 · Environmental Ethics.” He argues that classic sentimentalism rather than neo sentimentalism provides the best grounding

GENERALANNOUNCEMENTS

3 ISEE Newsletter ­ Summer 2015

GENERALANNOUNCEMENTS

IRS awards ISEE non­profit status

The U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS)has notified the board of ISEE that ourapplication for non­profit status as apublic charity has been accepted. Thiscompletes an effort to "regularize" thelegal status of ISEE, which let itsincorporated status lapse at some pointduring the past 10 to 15 years. We arenow incorporated anew, in the state ofColorado, and a 501 (c) (3) public charityunder the internal revenue code. Amongother things, having public charity statusmeans we can now receive gifts orbequests that are tax deductible­­so feelfree.

Registration opens for ISEE 2015 in Kiel,Germany

After some unforeseen delay, the ISEEregistration website is now available. Youcan register online at:

http://www.isee2015.uni­kiel.de/iseeinhalt/Registration­Registration.php

On the homepage you will also findadditional information regarding theconference program and fees. Pleasenote that, unfortunately, David Abramwill not be able to attend the conferencebecause of family reasons. Instead, thekeynote lecture will be given by DarrelMoellendorf. In case of further questionsplease do not hesitate to contactorganizers Prof. Dr. KonradOtt / ott[at]philsem.uni­kiel.de, Dr.Lieske Voget­Kleschin / voget­kleschin[at]philsem.uni­kiel.de, Dr.Florian Braun / braun[at]philsem.uni­kiel.de, or ChristianBaatz / baatz[at]philsem.uni­kiel.de

Elections results

The results for the ISEE election forofficers and nominating committee for2016­2018 are in. The election has beenoverseen and the results tabulated byHenry Cafaro (Phil’s son) and double­checked by Ben Hale (ISEE VP). Votingwas anonymous. The followingcandidates have won election:

Vice­president/President­elect: AllenThompson

Treasurer: Robert Figueroa

Secretary: Aline Ramos

Newsletter editor: Matt Ferkany

Nominating committee: Karen Shockley,Lori Gruen, Jennifer Everett, JeremyBendik­Keymer, John Nolt, Megs Gendreu

Thanks and congratulations to all whostood for these positions!

Page 4: V UMBER S ISSN 82248250 - WordPress.com · 2016-08-11 · Environmental Ethics.” He argues that classic sentimentalism rather than neo sentimentalism provides the best grounding

4ISEE Newsletter ­ Summer 2015

2015 Winners of the Holmes Rolston IIIEarly Career Prize Announced

ISEE is pleased to announce the winnersof the 2015 Holmes Rolston Early CareerPrize. They are Toby Svoboda, anassistant professor at FairlfieldUniversity, and Tyler Kasperbauer, apost­doctoral fellow in the Department ofFood and Resource Economics at theUniversity of Copenhagen.

Svoboda won for his essay"Geoengineering, Agent­Regret, and theLesser of Two Evils Argument,” where heargues that proposals to deploy solarradiation management (SRM) to fightclimate change are immune to objectionsthat a climate emergency mightconstitute a genuine moral dilemma inwhich SRM would be impermissible evenif it was the best option.

Kasperbauer won for his essay"Naturalizing Sentimentalism forEnvironmental Ethics.” He argues thatclassic sentimentalism rather than neo­sentimentalism provides the bestgrounding for environmental ethics, inpart because it better fits the facts ofhuman psychology.

Svoboda and Kasperbauer win $500prizes from ISEE. Their essays will bepublished in the journal "EnvironmentalEthics" later this year.

Page 5: V UMBER S ISSN 82248250 - WordPress.com · 2016-08-11 · Environmental Ethics.” He argues that classic sentimentalism rather than neo sentimentalism provides the best grounding

GENERALANNOUNCEMENTS

5 ISEE Newsletter ­ Summer 2015

MEMBERNEWS

Jeremy David Bendik­Keymer: This pastyear, I finished an entry on massextinction for the Oxford Handbook ofEnvironmental Ethics and a book ofexperimental writing that involved six"spiritual exercises" ­ascetic practices ofphilosophy done in different ways. SolarCalendar, and Other Ways of MarkingTime wove together­­in the words of onereader­­"the cosmos in the personal andthe personal in the cosmos." One of itscentral problems was the difficulty ofkeeping in view both personal andgeological­­or planetary­­perspectives,and two of the studies directly concernedmass extinction. Another reader wrote,"Like much of the best writing on therelation between human civilization andnonhuman nature—Thoreau’smeditations in Walden, Herman Melville’s“The Encantadas,” Rachel Carson’s TheSea Around Us, the poetry of KennethRexroth, Robinson Jeffers, and JorieGraham—Solar Calendar opens uptemporal vortices, through which we canconsider simultaneously the contrastingframes of human, geological, and evencosmic time. ... I have never readanything like Solar Calendar. ... Thoughthe scope of its concerns is vast, it is awork equally fitted to the scale of ahuman reader. "

This coming year, I will be workingfurther on capabilities and other specieswith Martha and Rachel Nussbaum,Breena Holland, Amy Linch, and others;doing some interdisciplinary work onpolicing; and writing an entry for theCambridge handbook on capabilities. Iam also putting together past andforthcoming work on anthroponomy formy next book, The Anthroponomists. Thisnext book deepens and follows throughthe main idea of Allen Thompson's andmy Ethical Adaptation to Climate Change­that adaptation demands adjustedethical concepts. The Anthroponomists

will be typically theoretical­­notexperimental in genre­­and willconceptualize the active citizen scaled toplanetary environmental change. Finally,I will be collaborating with artist MichaelRakowitz and many others on a multi­year socially engaged art project inCleveland around the killing of Tamir Ricecalled A Color Removed.

Ken Shockley: A few highlights from abusy year: I am coediting several specialissues of Ethics, Policy, and Environmenton the UNFCCC climate changenegotiations and related matters (pleasekeep your eyes peeled for calls forpapers). After hosting the secondworkshop on ethics and adaptation inMay, I will be hosting another workshopon ethics and adaptation duringSeptember of 2016 (please keep youreyes peeled for that call as well). I'vebeen busy directing UB's SustainabilityAcademy, which has led me to spend abit of time pondering different forms ofcollaboration and the relationshipbetween Sustainability, EnvironmentalStudies, and Environmental Philosophy.And I've continued my collaborative workwith a team of Environmental Engineersand Oral Historians looking at legacygroundwater contamination sites, whichhas led me to participate more heavily inAESS, and to spend a bit of timerethinking the relationship betweenecological systems and value. And I'mtrying to spend every remaining momentin the woods.

Page 6: V UMBER S ISSN 82248250 - WordPress.com · 2016-08-11 · Environmental Ethics.” He argues that classic sentimentalism rather than neo sentimentalism provides the best grounding

6 ISEE Newsletter ­ Summer 2015

Emily Brady: Emily Brady, University ofEdinburgh and a past President of ISEE,will be delivering her inaugural lecture onMay 28th, 2015 in Edinburgh, "NaturalBeauty: A Philosophical Approach". Emilywas promoted to a professorial chair,Professor of Environment and Philosophy,at the University in 2013. Edinburgh hasan historical tradition of 'inaugural'lectures for new professors.

Matt Ferkany: Spring has been a busyand somewhat wild term. In January Ipresented at a conference hosted by theJubilee Centre for Character and Virtuesin Birmingham, UK and this led to a weekconferencing with the Centre in Rome,Italy in March and a 3­month researchfellowship at the University ofBirmingham to begin in September.Meanwhile I will be re­joining theDepartment of Philosophy at MichiganState University as assistant professor ofethics while maintaining a 25%appointment in Teacher Education. Thischange positions me well to continue mywork connecting ideas in environmentalvirtue ethics to democratic charactereducation.

Allen Thompson: Allen was selected fora Carson Fellowship at the Rachel CarsonCenter for Environment and Society. He’llbe in residency at the RCC in MunichGermany for three months in the springof 2016.

Jennifer Everett: As co­director ofDePauw's environmental honorsprogram, I will be attending a workshopat Wellesley College on June 8th and 9thon Diversity and Privilege Across theEnvironmental Studies Curriculum. Sincepeople of color are under­represented inenvironmental professions and academicprograms across the disciplines, andeven more under­represented in thediscipline of philosophy, it's a pretty safe

empirical bet that EnvironmentalPhilosophy as a field could stand tobenefit from more diverse perspectives.I'm interested in hearing from others inthe discipline who would be interested inworking concretely toward this end.

Page 7: V UMBER S ISSN 82248250 - WordPress.com · 2016-08-11 · Environmental Ethics.” He argues that classic sentimentalism rather than neo sentimentalism provides the best grounding

GENERALANNOUNCEMENTS

7 ISEE Newsletter ­ Summer 2015

NEWS FROM THE FIELD

New website to integrate and coordinateactivities of climate change scholars

Our members might well be interested ina new initiative, Global Climate ChangeWeek (GCCW), intended to integrate andcoordinate the efforts of the wide rangeof academics interested in climatechange action. The intent is to focusefforts around the week of Oct 19­25through the use of the GCCW website(http://globalclimatechangeweek.com).

From Keith Horton, the organizer, “Oneof the website’s features is a map thatwill show which academics around theworld are taking part and (if appropriate)what they are planning to do(http://globalclimatechangeweek.com/gccw­map). The map becomes populatedwhen academics fill in the ‘register yourinterest’ (or ‘register an activity’) formon the rhs of every page. So if you thinkyou would like to participate, do pleasefill the form in!” If you have anyquestions or suggestions regardingGCCW, please contact KeithHorton:[email protected].

­ Ken Shockley

An Update on OBET

Editor’s note: David Lahti is AssistantProfessor of Biology at Queen’s CollegeCUNY. He maintains the OnlineBibliography of Environmental Thought(OBET), which has recently been downsome time for updating. He recentlyshared information on the history ofOBET, its current state, and future plansfor improvement. He can be contacted [email protected].

For those unfamiliar with it, OBETis the Online Bibliography ofEnvironmental Thought (OBET), aresource of ISEE. It is a database ofprofessional literature and other mediaon the relationship between humans andnature. It has been (and will continue tobe, once it is up again) locatedat http://www.isee­obet.org.

OBET has been down for about ayear to prepare for a newplatform, which should be up in July2015.

OBET began as a way of bringingISEE's existing environmental databaseup to date electronically, with a modernweb interface. Several ISEE membershave submitted materials to it, and ourmeager staff here at the City Universityof New York (with a lot of early help fromWilliam Grove­Fanning) have brought thetotal number of references currentlycovered up to over 20,000. 22environmental journals are completelycovered by it so far. To ourknowledge, OBET is the first fully user­managed topical academic database.Like other bibliographic databases, it isfully searchable and sortable, groupedinto topical categories, and results canbe exported in generic formats.

Page 8: V UMBER S ISSN 82248250 - WordPress.com · 2016-08-11 · Environmental Ethics.” He argues that classic sentimentalism rather than neo sentimentalism provides the best grounding

8ISEE Newsletter ­ Summer 2015

Unlike most academic databasesthat are subscribed to for a fee, OBET isfree for public use, and anyone in theworld with access to the Internet canview the entries. Of course, copyrightlaws apply: Unless someone hasuploaded papers to the site, onlyreferences and in many cases URLs willbe available such that viewers wouldhave to have a subscription to get to theactual articles or books.

Although anyone can useOBET, registered Contributors can uploadtheir own files and modify entries. Allcontributions, whether the entry ofbibliographic references, criticalcommentary, or uploaded materials, arepermanently associated with theirContributors.

OBET was officially launched onDecember 28, 2010, on the 20thanniversary of the inauguration of theInternational Society of EnvironmentalEthics and, one might say, of theacademic field of Environmental Ethics.This founding took place in Boston at theEastern Division meeting of the AmericanPhilosophical Association, by Prof.Holmes Rolston III and other officers.Prof. Rolston then began the ISEEBibliography, till OBET the largestbibliography in the world onenvironmental issues, locatedat http://www.cep.unt.edu/bib. We arecurrently importing its entire contentsinto OBET with his blessing.

Recently 2013­14 saw thefollowing:

­ Doubling of references indexed, from10,000 to 20,000 (currently 21,580).­ Increase in Environmental journalsfrom which full contents are indexed,from 15­23.­ Continued data entry of 1990­2008 CEPbibliography (in alphabetical order: wason A, now on C).

­ Mark Megerian has come on board asmanager of contributions: he solicits andoversees the student data entryvolunteers.­ Nikki Hanson is programming a newplatform for OBET.

Those who have tried to accessOBET recently will have noticed that it iscurrently not available. I have beenhoping for some time that we could havegreater control over OBET's functionality,appearance, and cost. We are currentlyin the process of transferring OBET froma proprietary platform to a new serverdedicated entirely to OBET. This transferhas the benefit of being both free andcan be modified as we wish over time. Ihope the new server will be up andrunning in July 2015.

The following are furtherexpectations for 2015:

­ PhilPapers will eventually integrate thephilosophy portion of OBET's references,and link to the OBET site.­ Increase indexed references to 30,000­ Increase covered full­contentsEnvironmental journals to 30­ Continue data entry of 1990­2008 CEPbibliography, through the letter F.­ Take on a volunteer to integrate OBETwith social media­ Integrate bibliographic contributionsfrom the ISEE Newsletter (WilliamGrove­Fanning and I tried to accomplishthis in 2012 but we did not finish).

In the meantime, please let meknow if you have any suggestions,especially as we are currently working onthe design of the new web interface. Ilook forward to sharing it with you beforewe go live, and as I mentioned we canalways change it in the future as well.­ David Lahti

Page 9: V UMBER S ISSN 82248250 - WordPress.com · 2016-08-11 · Environmental Ethics.” He argues that classic sentimentalism rather than neo sentimentalism provides the best grounding

GENERALANNOUNCEMENTS

9 ISEE Newsletter ­ Summer 2015

ARTICLE

Biodiversity and Environmental Ethicistsas Educators: An Interview with Phil

Cafaro

Editor's note: In the coming issues, I willbe interviewing different thinkers onsome aspect of their work inenvironmental ethics, but also on thebigger theme of how environmentalthinkers can bring their ideas to thebroader public or otherwise act toeducate the public on environmentalissues. I started at the top of ISEE byasking Phil Cafaro some questions onbiodiversity and the role of the universityprofessor in environmental education.

Ferkany: You have defended relativelyrecently a broadly nonanthropocentricway of thinking about the morality ofspecies preservation. If I understand itcorrectly, you think human interests inspecies preservation matter, we need topay attention to how this affects us, butthere's still a moral imperative topreserve biodiversity. Can you speak towhy we should worry about speciesextinction and why should people reallycare about this?

Cafaro: I think there are a number ofreasons why we should care aboutspecies extinction. The science isrelatively clear that we are convertinghabitats rapidly, changing the climate,introducing exotic species, over­harvesting wildlife, and altogetherputting tremendous pressure on otherspecies. A recent study by the WorldWildlife Fund, for example, affirmed thatif you look at vertebrate populations, allvertebrate types—birds, mammals, fish,reptiles, amphibians—there has been a52% decline in overall populationsaround the world in just the last twogenerations, the last 40 to 50 years. Sowe are looking at a world where we arerapidly replacing everything else with usand our economic support systems, and

we are losing a tremendous amount.

So, why should we care about that? Whynot just think, “Well, we're running theshow now and these changes are goodfor us?” Well they’re not good for us,that's one answer. But another answer isother species have intrinsic value.They're complex, they have ancientgenealogies … Each species is a genuineachievement, with a unique history and aunique destiny.

Then too, they call it biodiversity for areason. I mean it's part of what makesthis world a wonderful place, the factthat there are so many different kinds oforganisms, living in so many differentways, interacting in so many differentways. When we just rapidly displace allthat, it's a tremendous loss.

In his new book, Flight Ways: Life andLoss at the Edge of Extinction, Thom vanDooren's take on this is that eachparticular endangered species is adifferent case, you're tampering with adifferent history, you're cutting offdifferent ties that human beings couldhave to that species. So he resiststalking in general terms. He wants tosay, if we keep these around we canhave wonderful relationships with themand appreciate them, and all of thatrings very true to me. But you know,we've also got this idea that we'veinitiated a 6th mass extinction, and wehave to reckon with that, get at what theoverall story means. We’re not justlosing this, that, or the other species. Weare on track to do away with a fairamount of the biodiversity in the world inthe next century or two.

Ferkany: You've also defended broadideas within environmental virtue ethics,too, which sometimes casts itself astaking an approach to these issues thatsomehow fits in between the

Page 10: V UMBER S ISSN 82248250 - WordPress.com · 2016-08-11 · Environmental Ethics.” He argues that classic sentimentalism rather than neo sentimentalism provides the best grounding

10 ISEE Newsletter ­ Summer 2015

anthropocentric and nonanthropocentricdivide. I am wondering whether youwould agree that maybe there's a spacefrom within a virtue orientation that'ssomewhere in between saying, one theone hand, "Well we should care justbecause it's in our interest to do so, wedon't want to ruin the planet forourselves" and "We should care becausewe have a duty grounded in the intrinsicvalue of species to do so," a space whichfocuses on the virtue, or lack thereof,that would be shown by us of justrampantly destroying these otherspecies, as if we're the only ones herethat matter. Right, why are we soimportant that we get to decide who getsto stay and who gets to go?

Cafaro: Yeah, it think it's true, you cantake just a very nuts and bolts approachto it and say, "These might be resourcesfor our use and so we should be carefulwith them." But on the other hand youhave the kind of intrinsic valueapproaches that Holmes Rolston andBaird Callicott, have advanced, and thereis a sense in which the environmentalvirtue ethics approach is a little bitsplitting the difference there and saying,"Look at our enlightened self­interest.Think about the kind of world you wantyou and your children to live in. Thinkabout the kind of relationships with therest of nature you want to have. Thinkabout the kind of story you would becomfortable telling yourself and yoursociety about your role in eitherstewarding creation or in destroying it,displacing it.” So there's a sense in whichyou are sort of splitting the differencethere in a nice way.

Ferkany: In one of the older papersyou've written, on wildness, you get intosome of these issues. And there I thinkone of your ideas is that one of the mainthings we need to do relative tobiodiversity is to have a robust parkssystem. We need to limit development tomake sure we have spaces for wildspecies to be wild. Is that a view you still

hold today? What do you see as the maindrivers of species loss today and whatare the main things you think we need todo about it?

Cafaro: Yeah, I'm still a big proponent ofparks and protected areas. I think thecase is absolutely clear that protecting asmuch landscape and seascape aspossible is really one of the keys topreserving biodiversity. That's beenshown over and over again.

Recently, it's funny, people have beenpointing out that just preserving landdoesn't necessarily preserve species;habitat can be degraded and Impactsfrom outside can come in. And so, somepeople are saying that we don't need tofocus as much on protected areas. Theysay we have to focus more on conservingthings outside of protected areas. And,it's just a classic logical fallacy: protectedareas are a necessary part of conservingbiodiversity, but not in themselvessufficient for doing so, and so somepeople are talking as if they weren’t evennecessary.

There's been a big debate in theconservation biology literature aboutthis, and sure enough, the studies arecoming back, over and over again,saying that you do a much better job ofpreserving biodiversity in stronglyprotected areas. Outside lands, multiple­use lands, these are very important forconservation, very important forbiodiversity. We should do more workingwith them. But all that said, the bestthing you can do to preserve species is topreserve relatively unmodified habitat.And I think the conservation biologistsare stating that relatively clearly.

On your other question: if you look atthe main drivers of species loss,biodiversity loss, conservation biologistsalways come back to what they call thebig five: habitat loss and degradation,overexploitation (overhunting,overfishing and such), pollution, invasive

Page 11: V UMBER S ISSN 82248250 - WordPress.com · 2016-08-11 · Environmental Ethics.” He argues that classic sentimentalism rather than neo sentimentalism provides the best grounding

11ISEE Newsletter ­ Summer 2015

species, and climate change. So theytend to focus on those. But what'sdriving those?

If you look a little deeper, what's really“driving the drivers” is human economicactivity, of one sort or another. Thatreally is a function of the number ofpeople and per capita consumption,production and demand. And so whenyou really get down to it, it's ever morepeople putting ever more economicpressure on the landscape that's drivingthe loss of biodiversity. For that reason, Ithink that conservationists,environmental ethicists, conservationbiologists, need to talk a lot more aboutreining in those two things. We need tostabilize and probably substantiallyreduce our populations, and we need towork more towards a steady stateeconomy. Without that, I don't think allthe things we tend to focus on topreserve biodiversity are gonna work. Dothose two things and preserve as muchof the landscape and seascape aspossible. That's what we need to do topreserve biodiversity.

Ferkany: Okay, okay. So, um, the veryidea of biodiversity lately has beencontroversial, too, in some ways, andthis is another thing that you talk aboutin the wilderness paper. Truthfully, Idon't think I understand this criticismvery well and I'm wondering what yourtake on it is. What exactly is the criticismthat biodiversity is somehow a confusion,or that often the evidence is that we seemore of it in places that are developedlike agricultural lands? How do youunderstand this criticism and what of thetruth, if any, is being grasped there?

Cafaro: Yeah, there are different thingsthat people are saying about this. One ofthem has to do with criticizing the ideaof wildness. Another has to do with thequestion of whether people, when theyalter a landscape, are always harming it:can they sometimes increase biodiversityin that place? So those are two separate

and important issues to get into.

Let's take the latter issue first, this ideathat conservationists in the past havepushed wilderness conservation toomuch, and it turns out we can preserve alot of biodiversity on managedlandscapes, that maybe in some casesour activities can even increase totalspecies numbers. I think what you've gothere are some half truths people havepounced on and then tossed the babyout with the bath water.

Gary Nabhan, for instance, a couple ofyears ago pointed out that if you go tothe desert in southwestern Arizona andyou just count bird species there, you'regoing to get one number of species. Butif you go to a moderately developed,managed landscape in the same areawhere people have built some smallreservoirs, you're going to find largerspecies numbers. Well, that sort ofmakes sense, right? Birds will travel tofind water, etc, etc. So it's true.

In the same way, sometimes I might beable to find more birds right here aroundFort Collins, a managed landscape, thanI'll be able to find out on the prairiegrasslands 30 miles to the east, a lessdeveloped landscape. But what I'll find inFort Collins will be lots of introducedspecies having a global distribution and itwon't really be many of the specialiststhat would have been found here beforewhite settlement. So when I go out tothe Pawnee Grasslands, I don't see asmany species, but I'll see McCowan'slarkspurs, lark buntings, and I'll seethings that I just won't see in developedareas.

So you know, globally, biodiversity is thecreation of many, many different kinds ofspecial places with many differentcondition and habitats. When we createour own settlements and bring in a lot ofgeneralist species, we displace a lot ofthe specialized species. So if you justlook at that particular place you might

Page 12: V UMBER S ISSN 82248250 - WordPress.com · 2016-08-11 · Environmental Ethics.” He argues that classic sentimentalism rather than neo sentimentalism provides the best grounding

12 ISEE Newsletter ­ Summer 2015

see higher species numbers, but you'renot adding to global biodiversity in anysense, you're not creating new species.So that's part of the answer to that. Youhave to be a little more discriminating inhow you think about the differentcomponents of species. One wayconservation biologists might think of itis that you are creating alpha­diversity inthat particular place, but you are notincreasing beta diversity across thewhole landscape.

Now the other issue has to do withwildness. You've probably been followingsome of the debate about theanthropocene epoch we're entering. Youknow the idea there is that we'reimpacting everything very strongly,wilderness is an illusion, even if you goup into the Boundary Waters, even yougo up to Isle Royale National Park.Wherever you go, you can find humaninfluence. So some people are sayingthat means we need to recognize ourresponsibilities, and realize that weimpact everything, and don't worry somuch about whether we are having animpact or not, but rather worry justabout whether the impact is good interms of what kind of impacts we want tohave on the landscape. So people likePeter Kareiva, Michelle Marvier, EmmaMarris—who talks about the"rambunctious garden"—the idea that,okay, it's not going to wild anymore butit can sort of be wild­ish, and our maindecision is, "What do we want on thelandscape?

I think this whole way of approachingthings is a big mistake. What we shouldbe saying is, "Look at how much we'reimpacting everything and isn't thatterrible?" because so many of ourimpacts are bad. When you look at whatpeople say they're going to be able tosee in the signature we leave, 100,000or 10 million years from now, forinstance, well, it will be a layer of plastic.That's not so good. There'll be evidenceof our nuclear tests, you know, that's not

necessarily so great either. They'll see ahuge drop in biodiversity. Again, nothingto be proud of.

So it's not just that we're influencingthings. We're influencing things for thebad, and then beyond all that, the sheerscale and ubiquity of our influence is bad.Our influence is everywhere, and that Ithink is itself a bad thing. It'soverbearing, it's too much.

Ferkany: So this is perhapsoversimplifying, but generally speakingyour view of this is that we need to behands­off in some ways, and let wildnature do its thing, while still beingcompatible with management of varyingdegrees in other places. Is that fair tosay?

Cafaro: Yeah, that's fair to say, and I'deven go further and say that even in thewildest places, in the world we'vecreated, we might often have to manageto some degree. If we've created a worldwhere there were only, say, 200wolverines left, you might have to go in ifyou want to save that species, which isvery distinctive—the largest member ofthe weasel family, you know, we don'twant to lose that—you might have to goin and manage it somehow. I would havesupported, if I had had any say in it 30years ago, capturing the last fewCalifornia condors and intensivelybreading them and re­establishing them.So there are all sorts of individual caseswhere even a lover of wild nature willwant to go in and manage. But we don'twant to lose sight of the fact that thosecases come up because we've been sooverbearing. And what we want to startdoing is managing ourselves a littlebetter so that we can start stepping backa little more, and I think that's what theanthropocene proponents lose sight of.

Ferkany: So I want to move into somequestions about how we asenvironmental philosophers can bring ourideas to the broader public. Certainly you

Page 13: V UMBER S ISSN 82248250 - WordPress.com · 2016-08-11 · Environmental Ethics.” He argues that classic sentimentalism rather than neo sentimentalism provides the best grounding

13ISEE Newsletter ­ Summer 2015

and I, as university educators, one mainway we can do it is just in our roles aseducators at our universities, which oftenadvertise themselves as having a bigcivic mission. Certainly at my institution,this is a big part of the rhetoric, and it'staken up in some ways in philosophy. SoI am wondering if you can say somethings about what's going on at ColoradoState. What sorts of goals does theprogram have? How is it functioning toserve those goals? Does it see itself ashaving that kind of mission?

Cafaro: Yeah, sure, so you and I are insimilar kinds of places I think. MichiganState University is a land grantuniversity, right?

Ferkany: Yeah, yes we are.

Cafaro: So are we. So we have thatmission to educate the general public.We certainly have the mission nowadaysto educate them for environmentalsustainability. And so I think we can dothat in a number of ways.

First off, one basic way is just getting asmany students as possible into our basicenvironmental ethics classes and havingthem think through the ethical issuesconnected to our relationships to the restof nature. What does sustainability reallymean? What about environmentaljustice? You know, these are reallyimportant issues, and environmentalphilosophers have done a lot of reallygood thinking about them. And we don'twant to lose sight of the fact that even ifsome topic has been covered quite wellby us and we've moved on to the nextthing, you know, it's helpful to get youngpeople thinking about these things. Notindoctrinating them, not saying "This isthe answer." But having them havegenuine conversations with each otherand with us about these difficult issues. Ijust think the more they think about thisstuff, the better off we're going to be.

Ferkany: So recruitment, reaching out as

far as you can to just get people intoyour seats, for one thing, so that theycan actually be exposed to these ideasthat we've been talking about for quite awhile, that's important.

Cafaro: Yeah, I think it's real important.I think it's also important for us to reachout to our colleagues in differentdepartments, different parts of theuniversity. Here at Colorado State wehave a pretty strong School of GlobalEnvironmental Sustainability. I'm a fellowwith them this year, and they do a prettygood job of getting people around theuniversity to talk to each other. So forme, when I'm working away on theethics of species extinction, it's justhugely helpful for me to be able talk to acolleague who is working on tigerconservation in India, or a colleaguewho's a historian who has been lookingat land use issues in the 19th and 20thCentury western United States. So it'svery helpful for us to reach out and bringour special expertise and then interact inan interdisciplinary way with otherscholars. I think that's really important.

Now a third thing that I thinkphilosophers really can do is engage asindividuals in the political process. Andthere I think we often don't appreciatehow much value we can bring to that.Politics, when you get down to it—andthis is whether you're writing an op­edpiece, lobbying, attending or speaking ata rally—politics is often pretty confused,and the level of discourse is pretty low Ithink. Not always, but often. Andphilosophers are good thinkers, goodwriters, and we can improve the level ofdiscourse in politics.

Beyond that, those of us that care aboutenvironmental issues, because we havethese abilities, we can be a strong voicefor preserving nature, for dealing withclimate change, for addressingoverpopulation. I’m meeting next weekwith the Democratic and Republicanpolicy directors in the Colorado State

Page 14: V UMBER S ISSN 82248250 - WordPress.com · 2016-08-11 · Environmental Ethics.” He argues that classic sentimentalism rather than neo sentimentalism provides the best grounding

14 ISEE Newsletter ­ Summer 2015

Senate to discuss environmental andpopulation issues in our state, a meetingthat grew out of one of them seeing arecent panel discussion I was part of. I’mgearing up to work with a team of CSUprofessors and students who will beanalyzing an environmental impactstatement due out later this summer ona new dam proposal. Environmentalphilosophers are citizens; we shouldengage in these sorts of efforts.

Often I think when we talk to oneanother, environmental philosophers seta very high bar for what constitutesproving a point, and that's good ofcourse; we want to be rigorous. But Ithink we forget sometimes that we havesomething of value to bring into thepolitical process, and I think we need todo a lot more of that. And that's trickybecause, you know, you need to separateyour position as an educator in auniversity from advocating for particularpolitical positions. But I certainly havedone that in my time: I advocate verystrongly for certain positions and that ispart of what I can bring.

Ferkany: So you mentioned a momentago that when you bring, say,undergraduate students into theclassroom, just getting them exposed tothe ideas even, and thinking about themhas a value. And you also said, I think,"Well the idea isn't to indoctrinate themto any particular view, but just to getthem thinking about the issues." So itsounds like that's a different mode fromwhat you do in your public life where youdo become more of an advocate. In theclassroom setting, there's a line betweenadvocacy and education that you have tosort of work around.

Cafaro: Yeah, people handle thatdifferently. Some say say, "Here's theargument on this side, here's theargument on that side," and refrain fromstating their own views. I do thatsometimes, for things I don't care about!

Ferkany: Haha!

Cafaro: But other things, where I dohave a strong position, my method isjust to say, "I think really strongly this,I'm on this side of this issue, here’s why.But here are a couple of articles, acouple of Ted talks, or whatever, wherepeople are arguing the opposite side.” Ishow them that intelligent people takedifferent positions, and they have tomake up their own minds about it.

So you have to work that out in theclassroom. But you know, we're alsocitizens, and we have an obligation toadvocate policies we believe in in thepublic realm.

Page 15: V UMBER S ISSN 82248250 - WordPress.com · 2016-08-11 · Environmental Ethics.” He argues that classic sentimentalism rather than neo sentimentalism provides the best grounding

GENERALANNOUNCEMENTS

15 ISEE Newsletter ­ Summer 2015

NEW PUBLICATIONS:JOURNALS

Environment, Space, Place

Environment, Space, Place is a peer­reviewed transdisciplinary andinterdisciplinary journal committed tovalues contributing to our rootedness tothe earth and attunement to theenvironment, space, and place.Interdisciplinary is taken to mean thateach discipline is encouraged to share itsown particular excellence with the otherdisciplines in an open exchange.Transdisciplinary is taken to mean thatcontributors are required to make the"geographical turn." Meant in theetymological sense of "earthinscription"or the spatiality of meaning, thegeographical turn frames or makesthematic the spatial aspect of any and allearthly / worldly phenomena.

Vol 6, No 1, 2014

­ Placing Humanity: TheReconstruction of Pre­history atLascaux.54­75. David Dillard­Wright­ A Poetic Phenomenology of theTemperate Seasons.7­32. LukeFischer­ First Along the River: A Brief Historyof the U.S. Environmental Movement.4th ed. By Benjamin Kline.152­154.Brooks J. Flippen­ Explore Everything: Place Hackingthe City. By Bradley L. Garrett.154­157. Terrence W. Haverluk­ Farb Peter’s Garden: Case Study of aSpanish Art Environment.97­124. JoHernández­ Home 76­96. Melissa Ley­Cervantes­ Arctic Summer. 33­53. AlphonsoLingis­ Space and/or Place in EarlyAtlases.125­151.Newman, Winifred E.

Environmental Values

Environmental Values brings togethercontributions from philosophy,economics, politics, sociology, geography,anthropology, ecology, and otherdisciplines, which relate to the presentand future environment of human beingsand other species. In doing so it aims toclarify the relationship between practicalpolicy issues and more fundamentalunderlying principles or assumptions. EVis published by the White Horse Press.This journal came into existence in 1992and is published four times a year.

Vol.24, No.1, February 2015

­ Editorial: The Dying Planet Index:Life, Death and Man’s Domination ofNature. Clive L. Spash­ Paradigm Dressed as Epoch: TheIdeology of the Anthropocene. JeremyBaskin­ Naturalness or Biodiversity:Negotiating the Dilemma ofIntervention in Swedish ProtectedArea Management. Anders Steinwall­ Pushing the Radical NatureDevelopment Policy Concept in theNetherlands: An Agency Perspective.Simon Verduijn, Huub Ploegmakers,Sander Meijerink and Pieter Leroy­ Contesting Death: Conservation,Heritage and Pig Killing in Far NorthQueensland, Australia. Carla Meurk­ Nature Advocacy and the IndigenousSymbol. Mihnea Tanasescu

Page 16: V UMBER S ISSN 82248250 - WordPress.com · 2016-08-11 · Environmental Ethics.” He argues that classic sentimentalism rather than neo sentimentalism provides the best grounding

16ISEE Newsletter ­ Summer 2015

Vol.24, No.2, April 2015

­ Editorial: Depending on SomethingBigger. Simon Hailwood­ The Virtues of AcknowledgedEcological Dependence: Sustainability,Autonomy and Human FlourishingMike Hannis­ Should Biodiversity be Useful? Scopeand Limits of Ecosystem Services asan Argument for BiodiversityConservation. Glenn Deliège and StijnNeuteleers­ Virtues for the Anthropocene.Marcello di Paola­ The Land Aesthetic, HolmesRolston's Insight. Maria José Varandas­ Community Resilience and SocialMemory. Geoff A. Wilson

Vol.24, No.3, June 2015

­ Editorial: Democratic and PracticalEngagements with EnvironmentalValues. Alex Loftus­ Landscape Democracy, Three Sets ofValues, and the Connoisseur Method.Finn Arler and Helena Mellqvist­ Reframing Problems ofIncommensurability in EnvironmentalConflicts Through PragmaticSociology: From Value Pluralism tothe Plurality of Modes of Engagementwith the Environment. LauraCentemeri­ Should Ecological CitizenshipAdvocates Praise the Green State?.Carme Melo­Escrihuela­ Rejecting Eco­Authoritarianism,Again. Dan Coby Shahar­ The Capabilities Approach andEnvironmental Sustainability: TheCase for Functioning Constraints.Wouter Peeters, Jo Dirix and SigridSterckx­ Governance and Images:Representations of Certified SouthernProducers in High­Quality DesignMarkets. Anja Nygren

Ethics, Policy, & Environment

(EPE) is a journal of philosophy andgeography that offers scholarly articles,reviews, critical exchanges, and shortreflections on all aspects of geographicaland environmental ethics. The journalaims to publish philosophical work on theenvironment—human and natural, builtand wild—as well as meditations on thenature of space and place. While thescope of EPE includes environmentalphilosophy and cultural geography, it isnot limited to these fields. Past authorshave been concerned with a wide rangeof subjects, such as appliedenvironmental ethics, animal rights,justice in urban society, developmentethics, cartography, and cultural valuesrelevant to environmental concerns. Thejournal also welcomes theoreticalanalyses of practical applications ofenvironmental, urban, and regionalpolicies, as well as concrete proposals forgrounding our spatial policies in morerobust normative foundations. EPE ispublished by Routledge. The journalcame into existence in 1996 asPhilosophy & Geography, merged asEthics, Place & Environment in 2005, andchanged its name to Ethics, Policy, &Environment in 2010. It is publishedthree times a year.

Volume 18, Issue 1, 2015

Target Articles­ All Health is Local: Biodiversity, Ethics,and Human Health Matthew Butkus­ Biodiversity at Twenty­Five Years:Revolution Or Red Herring? Nicolae Morar, Ted Toadvine , Brendan J. M. Bohannan

Open Peer Commentaries­ Biodiversity and Values in Science AllenHabib­ Commentary on Matthew Butkus'‘Biodiversity, Ethics, and Human Health’Lisa Kretz­ Whose Biodiversity is In Trouble? ACommentary on Morar et al. Markku

Page 17: V UMBER S ISSN 82248250 - WordPress.com · 2016-08-11 · Environmental Ethics.” He argues that classic sentimentalism rather than neo sentimentalism provides the best grounding

17 ISEE Newsletter ­ Summer 2015

Oksanen­ Biodiversity as a General, ScientificConcept Christopher H. Eliot

Feature Articles­ How Much is a Healthy River Worth?The Value of Recreation­basedTourism in the Connecticut RiverWatershed Clement Loo , Helen Poulos, James Workman , Annie deBoer ,Julia Michaels­ Endangering the Natural Basis ofLife Is Unjust: On the Status andFuture of the Sustainability DiscourseChristian Becker , Dieter Ewringmann, Malte Faber , Thomas Petersen ,Angelika Zahrnt­ Is There a Sacrifice­Free Solution toClimate Change? J. Paul Kelleher­ Publicness, Privateness, and theManagement of Pollution

Udo Pesch

Commentary­ Ebola Needs One Bioethics Paul B.Thompson , Monica List

Reply to Critics­ Response to Commentaries on‘Ethical and Technical Challenges inCompensating for Harm Due to SolarRadiation ManagementGeoengineering’ Toby Svoboda , PeterIrvine

Book Reviews­ Climate Matters: Ethics in aWarming World Makoto Suzuki­ What's So Good About Biodiversity?A Call for Better Reasoning AboutNature's Value Markku Oksanen­ Climate Change, Ethics and HumanSecurity Sonia Graham

Green Humanities

Green Humanities is a peer­reviewedjournal of humanistic scholarship andpoetry that expresses the power of thehumanities–a book, a poem or a work ofart for example—to influence publicopinion and inspire engagement withecological issues and causes. GreenHumanities aims to place the humanitieson the frontlines not only of cutting edgeeco­criticism, but also of theenvironmental debates that will shapeand determine our very world. Weenvision varied collaborations andjuxtapositions of scholarship within thehumanities as well as environmentalsciences and related fields–all with theoverarching goal of coaxing our globalsociety toward a more sustainable future.

Volume 1, Winter 2015

Articles­ Samara Anne Cahill: “A ‘kind ofimpiety’: Deforestation, Sustainability,and Self in the Works of SamuelRichardson and Yuan Mei”­ Ali Brox: “The Process of Disaster:Environmental Justice Discourse andSpike Lee’s When the Levees Broke”­ Glenn Freeman: “Of Portages andPedagogy”­ Todd LeVasseur: “Is Trash Hybrid?”­ Fabio Valenti Possamai: “Recognizingthe Dualism to Overcome It: theHybridization of Reality”­ Laura BarbasRhoden: “Eco­DigitalPedagogies: Why and How Teachingthe Green Humanities Can ShapeChange”­ Brad Warren and Patrick West: “TheCreative Arts, Environmental Crises &Well­Being in Globalized Place:Methodological Considerations for anEcocritical Mode of Practice­BasedResearch”

Field Notes­ Heather Swan: “Honeybees”

Page 18: V UMBER S ISSN 82248250 - WordPress.com · 2016-08-11 · Environmental Ethics.” He argues that classic sentimentalism rather than neo sentimentalism provides the best grounding

18ISEE Newsletter ­ Summer 2015

Poems

Guest Poetry Editor: Renée Ashley

­ Lily Brown: “Field Figure” (after: TheInvisible Life of Small Things, byCristina Toro)­ Heather Swan: “Another Day Filledwith Sleeves of Light”­ Heather Lang: “speed of birds”­ Terry Gifford: “Mobiles”­ Donna J. Gelagotis Lee: “Pithy”­ Robin Chapman: “Baneheia Park,Kristiansland”­ Joel Weishaus: “Curing It”­ Elizabeth Walden: “I Hear This OnceWas a Prairie”­ Jesse Curran: “SustainabilityStudies”

Journal of Agricultural and EnvironmentalEthics

JAEE presents articles on ethical issuesconfronting agriculture, food production,and environmental concerns. The goal ofthis journal is to create a forum for thediscussion of moral issues arising fromactual or projected social policies inregard to a wide range of questions.Among these are ethical questionsconcerning the responsibilities ofagricultural producers, the assessment oftechnological changes affecting farmpopulations, the utilization of farmlandand other resources, the deployment ofintensive agriculture, the modification ofecosystems, animal welfare, theprofessional responsibilities ofagrologists, veterinarians, or foodscientists, the use of biotechnology, thesafety, availability, and affordability offood. JAEE publishes scientific articlesthat are relevant to ethical issues, aswell as philosophical papers and briefdiscussion pieces. JAEE is published bySpringer Netherlands. The journal cameinto existence in 1988 and is nowpublished six times a year.

Vol. 28, No. 2 2015­ Moderating the RelationshipBetween Price and Perceived Value ofEthical Products.217­230.Rafael A.Araque­Padilla, Maria José Montero­Simó, Pilar Rivera­Torres, & CarlosAragón­Gutiérrez­ Moral Values and Attitudes TowardDutch Sow Husbandry. 375­401.Tamara J Bergstra, Bart Gremmen, &Elsbeth N. Stassen­ Ethical Issues and PotentialStakeholder Priorities Associated withthe Application of GenomicTechnologies Applied to AnimalProduction Systems. 231­253. DavidColes, Lynn Frewer, & Ellen Goddard­ In Defense of Eating Meat. Journalof Agricultural and EnvironmentalEthics 28 (2):277­291. Timothy Hsiao­ Captivity for Conservation? Zoos ata Crossroads. 335­351. Jozef Keulartz­ Mind Versus Stomach: ThePhilosophical Meanings of Eating. 403­406. Michiel Korthals­ Current Agricultural PracticesThreaten Future Global FoodProduction. 203­216. Yongbo Liu,Xubin Pan, & Junsheng Li­ Ethics and Biofuel Production inChile.293­312. Celián Román­Figueroa & Manuel Paneque­ Tainted Food and the IcarusComplex: Psychoanalysing ConsumerDiscontent from Oyster Middens toOryx and Crake. 255­275. Hub Zwart­ Is Dandelion Rubber More Natural?Naturalness, Biotechnology and theTransition Towards a Bio­BasedSociety. 313­334. Hub Zwart, LotteKrabbenborg, & Jochem Zwier­ The Ideal of a Zero­WasteHumanity: Philosophical Reflections onthe Demand for a Bio­BasedEconomy.353­374. Jochem Zwier,Vincent Blok, Pieter Lemmens, &Robert­Jan Geerts

Page 19: V UMBER S ISSN 82248250 - WordPress.com · 2016-08-11 · Environmental Ethics.” He argues that classic sentimentalism rather than neo sentimentalism provides the best grounding

19 ISEE Newsletter ­ Summer 2015

Vol. 28, No. 1 2015­ Relationship Patterns in FoodPurchase: Observing SocialInteractions in Different ShoppingEnvironments. 21­42. Clara Cicatiello,Barbara Pancino, Stefano Pascucci, &Silvio Franco­ Moral Steaks? Ethical Discourses ofIn Vitro Meat in Academia andAustralia.85­107. Tasmin Dilworth &Andrew McGregor­ The Cayman Turtle Farm: Why WeCan’t Have Our Green Turtle and Eatit Too.57­66. Neil D’Cruze, RachelAlcock, & Marydele Donnelly­ Zhou, Zhang­Yue: DevelopingSuccessful Agriculture: An AustralianCase Study. 197­201.Brad W. Gilmour­ The Role of Quality Labels in Market­Driven Animal Welfare.67­84. LennartRavn Heerwagen, Morten RaunMørkbak, Sigrid Denver, PeterSandøe, & Tove Christensen­ GM Crops, the Hubris Argument andthe Nature of Agriculture.161­177.Payam Moula­ History Lessons: What UrbanEnvironmental Ethics Can Learn fromNineteenth Century Cities.143­159.Samantha Noll­ The Ethics of a Co­regulatory Modelfor Farm Animal WelfareResearch.127­142. C.J. C. Phillips & J.C. Petherick­ Looking for Moral Responsibility inOwnership: A Way to Deal withHazards of GMOs.43­56. Zoë Robaey­ Pesticides and the Patent Bargain.1­19. Cristian Timmermann­ Animal Welfare Concerns and Valuesof Stakeholders Within the DairyIndustry.109­126. B. A. Ventura, M.A. G. Von Keyserlingk, & D. M. Weary

­ The Ticking Clock: Addressing FarmAnimal Welfare in EmergingCountries.179­195. Marina A. G. VonKeyserlingk, Maria José Hötzel

Minding Nature

This journal explores conservation valuesand the practice of ecological democraticcitizenship. Published by the Center forHumans and Nature, one of the journal’scentral goals is to share the best thinkingthat the Center has generated. It isthese ideas—and their relevance topublic policy, economic reform, culturalinnovation, and ultimately the well­beingof our human and naturalcommunities—that Minding Nature hopesto convey.

Volume 8, No. 1 (2015)

­ Ecological Solidarity by: BruceJennings­ The Perils of De­extinction by: BenA. Minteer­ Rewilding Our Lives by: Harry W.Greene­ The Political Economy of the CapitalSystem: Food, Climate Change, andViolence by: Robert Drury King­ Toward a New Materialism: Matteras Dynamic by: Rachel Tillman­ Man Is Integral With Nature by:John S. Torday and W.B. Miller, Jr.­ William Ruddiman and theRuddiman Hypothesis by: Richard J.Blaustein­ From the CHN Archive­ CHN Bookshelf by: CHN Staff­ Finding Your Own Passenger Pigeonby: Steven M. Sullivan

Page 20: V UMBER S ISSN 82248250 - WordPress.com · 2016-08-11 · Environmental Ethics.” He argues that classic sentimentalism rather than neo sentimentalism provides the best grounding

20ISEE Newsletter ­ Summer 2015

The Trumpeter

The Trumpeter is an environmentaljournal dedicated to the development ofan ecosophy, or wisdom, born ofecological understanding and insight. Assuch, it serves the Deep EcologyMovement’s commitment to explore andanalyze philosophically relevantenvironmental concerns in light ofecological developments at everyrelevant level: metaphysics, science,history, politics. Gaining a deeperunderstanding involves a comprehensiveset of criteria that includes analyticalrigor, spiritual insight, ethical integrity,and aesthetic appreciation. TheTrumpeter was founded in 1983 by AlanDrengson.

Vol. 30, No. 2 (2014)

Whatever Happened to Deep Ecology?,A special issue marking the occasion ofthe 30th anniversary of The Trumpeter

Introduction­ Whatever Happened to DeepEcology? 95­100. Nathan Kowalsky

Opinion­ On Depth Ecology. 101­105. DavidAbram­ Deep Ecology, New Conservation,and the Anthropocene Worldview106­114. George Sessions

Articles­ Ecosophy at the End of Nature 115­140. Elisa Cavazza­ Deep Ecology: What is Said and (tobe) Done? 141­156. Mick Smith­ What is Living in Deep Ecology?157­183. John P. Clark­ Deep Ecology, the RadicalEnlightenment, and EcologicalCivilization. 184­205. Arran Gare

Narratives­ Why Deep Ecology Had to Die. 206­230. Ronnie Hawkins­ Deep Ecology and the Future of theWild in the Anthropocene. 231­246.Max Oelschlaeger­ From Deep Ecology to IntegralEcology: A Personal Retrospective.247­268. Michael E. Zimmerman

Book Reviews­ Taylor, Dark Green Religion: NatureSpirituality and the Planetary Future.269­272. Kelly Shepherd

Cartoon­ Future Balance (Miracle). 273.Ronnie Hawkins

Page 21: V UMBER S ISSN 82248250 - WordPress.com · 2016-08-11 · Environmental Ethics.” He argues that classic sentimentalism rather than neo sentimentalism provides the best grounding

GENERALANNOUNCEMENTS

21 ISEE Newsletter ­ Summer 2015

ISEE OFFICERS

President: Philip CafaroAddress: Department of Philosophy,Colorado State University, Fort Collins,CO 80523­1781 USATel: 970­491­2061Fax: 970­491­4900Email: [email protected]: Organizing ISEE at theAnnual Joint ISEE­IAEP Meeting onEnvironmental Philosophy

Vice­President: Ben HaleAddress: Philosophy and EnvironmentalStudies, 1333 Grandview, UCB 0488,University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder,CO, 80309Tel: 303­735­3624Fax: 303­735­1576Email: [email protected]: Organizing ISEE sessionsat the Eastern APA

Secretary: William Grove­FanningAddress: Department of Philosophy,University of Portland, 5000 N.Willamette Blvd., Portland, OR, 97203,USAEmail: [email protected]: Organizing ISEE sessionsat Pacific APA

Treasurer: Allen ThompsonAddress: Department of Philosophy,Oregon State University, 102C HovlandHall, Corvallis, OR, 97331­3902, USATel: 541­737­5654Fax: 541­737­2571Email: [email protected]: Organizing ISEE sessionsat the Central APA

Newsletter Editor: Matt FerkanyAddress: Department of Philosophy,Michigan State University, East Lansing,MI, 48824, USATel: 517­353­6470Email: [email protected]: Assemble and circulatethe newsletter 3 times annually

Website and listserve manager: AlineRamosAddress: CRC en Théorie de laConnaissance, Université du Québec àMontréal, Pavillion Thérèse­Casgrain (W),455, Boulevard René­Lévesque Est, 5e.Étage, Local W­5245, Montréal, QC,CANADA H2L 4Y2Email: [email protected]

Editor of Environmental Ethics: EugeneHargroveAddress: Department of Philosophy andReligious Studies, University of NorthTexas, P.O. Box 310980, Denton, TX76203­0980, USATel: 940­565­2266 Fax: 940­565­4448Email [email protected]

NEWSLETTER SUBMISSIONSPlease send any announcements,member news, bibliographic informationor other news items via email (preferred)or snail mail to Matt Ferkany at hisaddress listed above.

WEBSITE/LISTSERVE SUBMISSIONSPlease send any calls for papers, jobpostings, or related news items via email(preferred) or snail mail to Aline Ramosat her address above.

Page 22: V UMBER S ISSN 82248250 - WordPress.com · 2016-08-11 · Environmental Ethics.” He argues that classic sentimentalism rather than neo sentimentalism provides the best grounding

22ISEE Newsletter ­ Summer 2015

We continue to update and expand ourregional representation. Here is thecurrent list. If you are a member of ISEEin a country not on this list, pleasecontact Philip Cafaro [email protected] if you areinterested in representing ISEE.

Africa:SOUTH AFRICA: Johan P. Hattingh,Department of Philosophy, University ofStellenbosch, 7600 Stellenbosch, SouthAfrica. Hattingh heads the Unit forEnvironmental Ethics at Stellenbosch.Office Phone: 27 (country code) 21 (citycode) 808­2058. Secretary Phone: 808­2418. Home Phone: 887­9025. Fax:886­4343. Email: [email protected].

Australia:William Grey, Room E338, Department ofPhilosophy, University of Queensland,4067, Queensland 4072 Australia. Email:[email protected].

Asia:CHINA: Yang Tongjing, Institute ofPhilosophy, Chinese Academy of SocialSciences, Beijing, 100732, China. Email:[email protected].

PAKISTAN AND SOUTH ASIA: Nasir AzamSahibzada, Founder Member,Independent Trust for Education (ITE), T­28 Sahibzada House, Zeryab Colony,Peshawar City (NWFP), Pakistan. PostalCode. 25000. Phone: (92) (91)2040877). Cell Phone: 0334­9081801.Email: <[email protected]> [email protected].

TAIWAN: King Hen­Biau, President, Societyof Subtropical Ecology, 4th Fl. #3, Lane269, Roosevelt Road, Section 3, 106Taipei, Taiwan. Phone: 886­2­2369­9825. Cell Phone: 886­9­3984­1403.Fax: 886­2­2368­9885. Email:[email protected].

Europe:EASTERN EUROPE: Jan Wawrzyniak, Prof.UAM dr hab., Institute of LinguisticsUAM, Al. Niepodleglosci 4, 61­874Poznan, POLAND. Phone: +48 / 61 /8293691 and +48 / 61 / 8293663.Mobile: +48 / 66 / 3787032. Fax: +48 /61 / 8293662. Email: [email protected].

FINLAND: Markku Oksanen, Department ofSocial Policy and Social Psychology,University of Kuopio, P.O. Box 1627,70211, Finland. Email: [email protected] [email protected].

THE NETHERLANDS: Martin Drenthen, ISIS,Faculty of Science, Radboud University ofNijmegen, Postbox 9010, 6500 GLNijmegen, the Netherlands. OfficePhone: 31 (country code) 24 (city code)3612751. Fax: 31­24­3615564. HomeAddress: Zebrastraat 5, 6531TWNijmegen, the Netherlands. HomePhone: (31) – (24) –3238397. Email:[email protected].

UNITED KINGDOM: Isis Brook, Centre forProfessional Ethics, University of CentralLancashire, Preston, Lancashire, UnitedKingdom PR1 2HE. Phone: +44(0)1772892542. Email: [email protected].

GREECE: Stavros Karageorgakis, Theofilou26, 54633, Thessaloniki, Greece. Email:[email protected].

South America:Ricardo Rozzi, Department of Philosophyand Religion Studies, P.O. Box 310920,University of North Texas, Denton, TX76203­0920. Phone: 940­565­2266. Fax:940­565­4448. Email: [email protected].

REGIONALREPRESENTATIVES

Page 23: V UMBER S ISSN 82248250 - WordPress.com · 2016-08-11 · Environmental Ethics.” He argues that classic sentimentalism rather than neo sentimentalism provides the best grounding

23 ISEE Newsletter ­ Summer 2015

Mexico and Central America:Teresa Kwiatkowska, UniversidadAutonoma Metropolitana­Iztapalapa,Departamento de Filosofia, Av. Michoacany Purissima s/n, 09340 Mexico D.F.,Mexico. Office Phone: (5) 724 47 77.Home Phone: (5) 637 14 24. Fax: (5) 72447 78. Email: [email protected].

North America:CANADA:Thomas Heyd, Department of Philosophy,University of Victoria, P.O. Box 3045,Victoria, British Columbia V8W 3P4,Canada. Office Phone: 250­721­7512.Fax: 250­721­7511. Email:[email protected].

Nathan Kowalsky, Philosophy, St. Joseph'sCollege, University of Alberta, Edmonton,AB T6G 2J5, Canada. Office phone: 780­492­7681 ext. 257. Email:[email protected]

UNITED STATES:Ned Hettinger, Philosophy Department,College of Charleston, Charleston, SouthCarolina 29424, USA. Office Phone: 843­953­5786. Home Phone: 843­953­5786.Fax: 843­953­6388. Email:[email protected].

Holmes Rolston III, Department ofPhilosophy, Colorado State University,Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA. OfficePhone: 970­491­6315. Fax: 970­491­4900. Email:[email protected].

Jack Weir, Department of Philosophy,Morehead State University, UPO 662,Morehead, Kentucky 40351­1689, USA.Office Phone: 606­783­2785. HomePhone: 606­784­0046. Fax: 606­783­5346 (include Weir’s name on Fax).Email: j.weir@morehead­st.edu.

Page 24: V UMBER S ISSN 82248250 - WordPress.com · 2016-08-11 · Environmental Ethics.” He argues that classic sentimentalism rather than neo sentimentalism provides the best grounding

24ISEE Newsletter ­ Summer 2015

MEMBERSHIP ANDDUES FORM

Please enroll me as a member of the International Society for Environmental Ethics.

Annual regular dues are: $25 Regular Membership, $15 Student Membership. Members outsidethe United States should send the equivalent of US dollars, based on current exchange rates.

Enclosed are dues: ________.

Name and Affiliation:____________________________________________________________

Address (Include PostalCode):____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Phone: (______) ________________________

Fax: (_______)________________________

Email:_________________________________

ISEE now distributes the Newsletter electronically. Send with payment to: Allen Thompson,Department of Philosophy, Oregon State University, 102C Hovland Hall, Corvallis, OR, 97331­3902, USA. Or become a member or renew memberships using PayPal from the membershippage of the ISEE website by using a credit card.