UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

download UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

of 241

description

UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Winter 2013

Transcript of UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

  • 5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

    1/241

    Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 1

    ACTSC221 Section 1 Blake William Peter Thomas

    Characteristics of the Instructor

    1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

    Excellent: 26, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

    Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 29, Somewhat too low: 5, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

    3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

    Excellent: 23, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

    Excellent: 22, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

    Excellent: 24, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 13, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 16

    7) Did you find the course interesting?

    Very interesting: 8, Interesting: 26, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 0

    8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

    Excellent: 25, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    Characteristics of the Course

    9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

    90-100%: 28, 75-90%: 9, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

    10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 28, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

    11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 23, No opinion: 2

    12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 22, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 1, No opinion: 1

    13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

    Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 36, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

    14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

    Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 36, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

    15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

    0-2 hours: 9, 3-6 hours: 24, 7-10 hours: 6, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

    62% (39 of 63) of students answered some questions.

  • 5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

    2/241

    Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 2

    ACTSC231 Section 1 Freeland R Keith

    Characteristics of the Instructor

    1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

    Excellent: 40, Good: 43, Satisfactory: 20, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

    Too High: 5, Somewhat too high: 12, Just right: 78, Somewhat too low: 9, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

    3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

    Excellent: 33, Good: 50, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

    4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

    Excellent: 36, Good: 39, Satisfactory: 23, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

    Excellent: 36, Good: 42, Satisfactory: 21, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 12, Most of the time: 19, Often enough: 27, Not often enough: 5, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 41

    7) Did you find the course interesting?

    Very interesting: 17, Interesting: 65, Not Interesting: 14, No opinion: 4

    8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

    Excellent: 35, Good: 41, Satisfactory: 25, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

    Characteristics of the Course

    9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

    90-100%: 84, 75-90%: 18, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

    10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 19, Helpful: 41, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 36, No opinion: 4

    11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 16, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 59, No opinion: 5

    12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 42, Helpful: 46, Not helpful: 7, No text required: 4, No opinion: 5

    13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

    Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 15, Okay: 78, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 3

    14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

    Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 69, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 2, No opinion: 15

    15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

    0-2 hours: 9, 3-6 hours: 63, 7-10 hours: 27, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 1

    57% (104 of 182) of students answered some questions.

  • 5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

    3/241

    Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 3

    ACTSC231 Section 2 Freeland R Keith

    Characteristics of the Instructor

    1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

    Excellent: 31, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

    2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

    Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 60, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

    3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

    Excellent: 23, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 7

    4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

    Excellent: 26, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

    Excellent: 30, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

    6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 10, Most of the time: 11, Often enough: 12, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 34

    7) Did you find the course interesting?

    Very interesting: 12, Interesting: 42, Not Interesting: 11, No opinion: 1

    8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

    Excellent: 24, Good: 32, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    Characteristics of the Course

    9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

    90-100%: 53, 75-90%: 11, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

    10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 20, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 18, No opinion: 1

    11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 40, No opinion: 2

    12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 34, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 3, No opinion: 5

    13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

    Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 55, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

    14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

    Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 49, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 10

    15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

    0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 45, 7-10 hours: 15, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 1

    37% (68 of 184) of students answered some questions.

  • 5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

    4/241

    Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 4

    ACTSC232 Section 1 Li Siu Hang

    Characteristics of the Instructor

    1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

    Excellent: 60, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

    Too High: 2, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 58, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1

    3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

    Excellent: 35, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

    4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

    Excellent: 55, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

    Excellent: 51, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 21, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 11, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 27

    7) Did you find the course interesting?

    Very interesting: 27, Interesting: 35, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 3

    8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

    Excellent: 57, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    Characteristics of the Course

    9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

    90-100%: 61, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

    10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 41, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 2

    11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 27, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 18, No opinion: 2

    12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 23, Not helpful: 6, No text required: 17, No opinion: 13

    13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

    Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 51, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 1, No opinion: 3

    14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

    Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 63, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

    15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

    0-2 hours: 18, 3-6 hours: 35, 7-10 hours: 10, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1

    72% (68 of 94) of students answered some questions.

  • 5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

    5/241

    Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 5

    ACTSC331 Section 1 Skrzydlo Diana Katherine

    Characteristics of the Instructor

    1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

    Excellent: 40, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

    Too High: 3, Somewhat too high: 12, Just right: 55, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

    3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

    Excellent: 29, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

    4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

    Excellent: 31, Good: 30, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

    Excellent: 37, Good: 25, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 17, Most of the time: 16, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 5, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 27

    7) Did you find the course interesting?

    Very interesting: 12, Interesting: 43, Not Interesting: 10, No opinion: 4

    8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

    Excellent: 28, Good: 33, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    Characteristics of the Course

    9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

    90-100%: 61, 75-90%: 9, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

    10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 23, Helpful: 44, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 2

    11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 5, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 54, No opinion: 4

    12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 27, Not helpful: 14, No text required: 13, No opinion: 8

    13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

    Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 53, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

    14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

    Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 20, Okay: 47, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

    15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

    0-2 hours: 16, 3-6 hours: 38, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 3

    60% (71 of 119) of students answered some questions.

  • 5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

    6/241

    Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 6

    ACTSC371 Section 1 Matheson Brenton James

    Characteristics of the Instructor

    1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

    Excellent: 13, Good: 30, Satisfactory: 35, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 6, No opinion: 0

    2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

    Too High: 11, Somewhat too high: 22, Just right: 44, Somewhat too low: 7, Too low: 2, No opinion: 4

    3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

    Excellent: 15, Good: 39, Satisfactory: 30, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

    4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

    Excellent: 13, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 32, Unsatisfactory: 16, Very poor: 7, No opinion: 0

    5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

    Excellent: 18, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 30, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 8, No opinion: 0

    6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 13, Most of the time: 19, Often enough: 21, Not often enough: 11, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 27

    7) Did you find the course interesting?

    Very interesting: 10, Interesting: 46, Not Interesting: 30, No opinion: 4

    8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

    Excellent: 13, Good: 31, Satisfactory: 29, Unsatisfactory: 11, Very poor: 7, No opinion: 0

    Characteristics of the Course

    9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

    90-100%: 64, 75-90%: 21, 50-75%: 5, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 0

    10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 19, Helpful: 59, Not helpful: 10, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 4

    11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 13, No printed course notes: 46, No opinion: 1

    12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 55, Not helpful: 21, No text required: 2, No opinion: 6

    13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

    Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 25, Okay: 60, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 2

    14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

    Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 78, Somewhat too little: 6, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

    15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

    0-2 hours: 17, 3-6 hours: 56, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 1

    45% (92 of 203) of students answered some questions.

  • 5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

    7/241

    Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 7

    ACTSC372 Section 1 Ali Javid

    Characteristics of the Instructor

    1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

    Excellent: 64, Good: 42, Satisfactory: 18, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

    2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

    Too High: 8, Somewhat too high: 30, Just right: 84, Somewhat too low: 4, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

    3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

    Excellent: 62, Good: 51, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

    4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

    Excellent: 48, Good: 47, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 12, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

    5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

    Excellent: 55, Good: 43, Satisfactory: 22, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 0

    6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 50, Most of the time: 26, Often enough: 15, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 34

    7) Did you find the course interesting?

    Very interesting: 36, Interesting: 67, Not Interesting: 16, No opinion: 6

    8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

    Excellent: 64, Good: 46, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 1

    Characteristics of the Course

    9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

    90-100%: 112, 75-90%: 11, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

    10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 40, Helpful: 83, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

    11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 19, Helpful: 37, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 59, No opinion: 8

    12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 42, Not helpful: 31, No text required: 18, No opinion: 21

    13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

    Too much: 8, Somewhat too much: 27, Okay: 84, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 4, No opinion: 1

    14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

    Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 106, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 3, No opinion: 0

    15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

    0-2 hours: 37, 3-6 hours: 71, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 2

    62% (127 of 205) of students answered some questions.

  • 5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

    8/241

    Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 8

    ACTSC431/ACTSC831 Section 1 Cai Jun

    Characteristics of the Instructor

    1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

    Excellent: 25, Good: 39, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 0

    2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

    Too High: 7, Somewhat too high: 26, Just right: 45, Somewhat too low: 6, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

    3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

    Excellent: 15, Good: 24, Satisfactory: 30, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 6

    4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

    Excellent: 24, Good: 30, Satisfactory: 24, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

    5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

    Excellent: 7, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 35, Unsatisfactory: 15, Very poor: 7, No opinion: 0

    6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 10, Most of the time: 12, Often enough: 22, Not often enough: 5, Never: 2, I did not seek help: 34

    7) Did you find the course interesting?

    Very interesting: 10, Interesting: 56, Not Interesting: 13, No opinion: 4

    8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

    Excellent: 17, Good: 40, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 8, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

    Characteristics of the Course

    9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

    90-100%: 77, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

    10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 38, Helpful: 45, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

    11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 20, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 35, No opinion: 3

    12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 24, Not helpful: 18, No text required: 11, No opinion: 19

    13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

    Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 19, Okay: 59, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

    14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

    Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 17, Okay: 63, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

    15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

    0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 56, 7-10 hours: 18, 11-15 hours: 5, > 15 hours: 0

    46% (85 of 183) of students answered some questions.

  • 5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

    9/241

    Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 9

    ACTSC432/ACTSC832 Section 1 Cai Jun

    Characteristics of the Instructor

    1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

    Excellent: 23, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

    Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 15, Just right: 40, Somewhat too low: 9, Too low: 1, No opinion: 0

    3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

    Excellent: 9, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 10, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 5

    4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

    Excellent: 18, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

    Excellent: 5, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 28, Unsatisfactory: 12, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

    6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 5, Most of the time: 13, Often enough: 20, Not often enough: 5, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 25

    7) Did you find the course interesting?

    Very interesting: 4, Interesting: 48, Not Interesting: 7, No opinion: 5

    8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

    Excellent: 8, Good: 38, Satisfactory: 19, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

    Characteristics of the Course

    9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

    90-100%: 53, 75-90%: 11, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

    10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 33, Helpful: 32, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 1, No opinion: 0

    11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 21, Not helpful: 2, No printed course notes: 29, No opinion: 1

    12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 25, Not helpful: 12, No text required: 12, No opinion: 15

    13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

    Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 10, Okay: 55, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

    14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

    Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 57, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 1

    15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

    0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 43, 7-10 hours: 13, 11-15 hours: 7, > 15 hours: 0

    64% (69 of 108) of students answered some questions.

  • 5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

    10/241

    Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 10

    ACTSC445/ACTSC845 Section 1 Ali Javid

    Characteristics of the Instructor

    1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

    Excellent: 70, Good: 29, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

    Too High: 9, Somewhat too high: 17, Just right: 71, Somewhat too low: 6, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

    3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

    Excellent: 63, Good: 36, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

    Excellent: 54, Good: 37, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

    5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

    Excellent: 62, Good: 33, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 39, Most of the time: 18, Often enough: 8, Not often enough: 1, Never: 1, I did not seek help: 35

    7) Did you find the course interesting?

    Very interesting: 25, Interesting: 61, Not Interesting: 9, No opinion: 6

    8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

    Excellent: 71, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    Characteristics of the Course

    9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

    90-100%: 77, 75-90%: 19, 50-75%: 5, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

    10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 28, Helpful: 62, Not helpful: 10, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

    11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 26, Helpful: 43, Not helpful: 6, No printed course notes: 17, No opinion: 8

    12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 57, No opinion: 17

    13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

    Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 78, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

    14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

    Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 14, Okay: 81, Somewhat too little: 4, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

    15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

    0-2 hours: 25, 3-6 hours: 56, 7-10 hours: 14, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 2

    66% (103 of 156) of students answered some questions.

  • 5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

    11/241

    Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 11

    ACTSC446/STAT446 Section 1 Weng Chengguo

    Characteristics of the Instructor

    1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

    Excellent: 35, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 0

    2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

    Too High: 5, Somewhat too high: 13, Just right: 51, Somewhat too low: 6, Too low: 3, No opinion: 0

    3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

    Excellent: 43, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

    4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

    Excellent: 35, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 4, No opinion: 0

    5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

    Excellent: 23, Good: 22, Satisfactory: 19, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 8, No opinion: 0

    6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 34, Most of the time: 12, Often enough: 14, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 17

    7) Did you find the course interesting?

    Very interesting: 21, Interesting: 44, Not Interesting: 12, No opinion: 1

    8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

    Excellent: 34, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 17, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

    Characteristics of the Course

    9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

    90-100%: 57, 75-90%: 13, 50-75%: 7, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

    10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 29, Helpful: 45, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

    11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 31, Helpful: 28, Not helpful: 7, No printed course notes: 9, No opinion: 1

    12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 35, Not helpful: 9, No text required: 6, No opinion: 14

    13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

    Too much: 14, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 49, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 3, No opinion: 0

    14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

    Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 66, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 2, No opinion: 1

    15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

    0-2 hours: 18, 3-6 hours: 39, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 4, > 15 hours: 4

    60% (78 of 129) of students answered some questions.

  • 5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

    12/241

    Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 12

    ACTSC463/ACTSC863 Section 1 Van Kooten Christopher John

    Characteristics of the Instructor

    1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

    Excellent: 9, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

    Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 15, Just right: 15, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1

    3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

    Excellent: 11, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

    Excellent: 10, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

    5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

    Excellent: 16, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 5, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 12, Not often enough: 5, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 13

    7) Did you find the course interesting?

    Very interesting: 11, Interesting: 17, Not Interesting: 7, No opinion: 3

    8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

    Excellent: 10, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    Characteristics of the Course

    9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

    90-100%: 29, 75-90%: 8, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

    10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 12, No opinion: 2

    11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 9, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 1

    12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 16, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 5, No opinion: 5

    13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

    Too much: 9, Somewhat too much: 7, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

    14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

    Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 3, No opinion: 5

    15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

    0-2 hours: 18, 3-6 hours: 15, 7-10 hours: 1, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 2

    64% (38 of 59) of students answered some questions.

  • 5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

    13/241

    Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 13

    AFM101 Section 051 Neil Brisley

    Characteristics of the Instructor

    1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

    Excellent: 7, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

    Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 4, Just right: 7, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

    3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

    Excellent: 5, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

    Excellent: 6, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

    Excellent: 6, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 2, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 2

    7) Did you find the course interesting?

    Very interesting: 7, Interesting: 3, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 1

    8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

    Excellent: 6, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    Characteristics of the Course

    9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

    90-100%: 10, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

    10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

    11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 5, No opinion: 1

    12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 0, No opinion: 1

    13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

    Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 5, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

    14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

    Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 11, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

    15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

    0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 8, 7-10 hours: 1, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1

    60% (12 of 20) of students answered some questions.

  • 5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

    14/241

    Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 14

    AFM102 Section 051 Neil Brisley

    Characteristics of the Instructor

    1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

    Excellent: 4, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

    Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 1, Just right: 11, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

    3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

    Excellent: 4, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

    Excellent: 3, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

    Excellent: 4, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 4, Most of the time: 5, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 1

    7) Did you find the course interesting?

    Very interesting: 4, Interesting: 6, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 2

    8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

    Excellent: 3, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    Characteristics of the Course

    9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

    90-100%: 7, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

    10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

    11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 5, No opinion: 1

    12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 8, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 0, No opinion: 0

    13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

    Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 9, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

    14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

    Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 9, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

    15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

    0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 8, 7-10 hours: 2, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 1

    62% (13 of 21) of students answered some questions.

  • 5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

    15/241

    Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 15

    AMATH231 Section 1 Vrscay Edward R

    Characteristics of the Instructor

    1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

    Excellent: 3, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

    Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 8, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

    3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

    Excellent: 7, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

    4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

    Excellent: 0, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

    Excellent: 4, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 1, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 8

    7) Did you find the course interesting?

    Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 9, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0

    8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

    Excellent: 2, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    Characteristics of the Course

    9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

    90-100%: 8, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

    10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

    11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 0

    12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 9, No opinion: 1

    13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

    Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 7, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

    14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

    Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 10, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

    15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

    0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 8, 7-10 hours: 3, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

    43% (12 of 28) of students answered some questions.

  • 5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

    16/241

    Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 16

    AMATH250 Section 1 West Joseph John

    Characteristics of the Instructor

    1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

    Excellent: 47, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

    Too High: 4, Somewhat too high: 13, Just right: 44, Somewhat too low: 5, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

    3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

    Excellent: 40, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

    Excellent: 41, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

    Excellent: 47, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 20, Most of the time: 12, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 26

    7) Did you find the course interesting?

    Very interesting: 17, Interesting: 37, Not Interesting: 11, No opinion: 1

    8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

    Excellent: 44, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    Characteristics of the Course

    9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

    90-100%: 45, 75-90%: 17, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 1, < 25%: 0

    10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 27, Helpful: 35, Not helpful: 3, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

    11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 14, Helpful: 35, Not helpful: 8, No printed course notes: 4, No opinion: 5

    12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 35, No opinion: 4

    13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

    Too much: 5, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 42, Somewhat too little: 5, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

    14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

    Too much: 8, Somewhat too much: 12, Okay: 44, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

    15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

    0-2 hours: 9, 3-6 hours: 44, 7-10 hours: 8, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

    50% (66 of 132) of students answered some questions.

  • 5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

    17/241

    Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 17

    AMATH251 Section 1 Miskovic Zoran

    Characteristics of the Instructor

    1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

    Excellent: 3, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

    2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

    Too High: 5, Somewhat too high: 13, Just right: 13, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 2, No opinion: 2

    3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

    Excellent: 8, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 6, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

    4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

    Excellent: 2, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 9, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

    5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

    Excellent: 3, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

    6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 7, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 23

    7) Did you find the course interesting?

    Very interesting: 14, Interesting: 18, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 2

    8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

    Excellent: 6, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

    Characteristics of the Course

    9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

    90-100%: 34, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 1

    10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 26, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

    11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 30, No opinion: 4

    12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 5, No text required: 1, No opinion: 3

    13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

    Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 19, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

    14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

    Too much: 12, Somewhat too much: 19, Okay: 6, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

    15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

    0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 12, 7-10 hours: 16, 11-15 hours: 6, > 15 hours: 2

    78% (38 of 49) of students answered some questions.

  • 5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

    18/241

    Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 18

    AMATH271 Section 1 Emerson Joseph

    Characteristics of the Instructor

    1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

    Excellent: 2, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

    Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 2, Just right: 16, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 1, No opinion: 1

    3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

    Excellent: 10, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

    Excellent: 2, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

    Excellent: 3, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

    6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 3, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 9

    7) Did you find the course interesting?

    Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 7, Not Interesting: 5, No opinion: 1

    8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

    Excellent: 4, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

    Characteristics of the Course

    9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

    90-100%: 17, 75-90%: 4, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

    10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 13, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

    11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 18, No opinion: 1

    12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 0, No opinion: 1

    13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

    Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 17, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

    14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

    Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

    15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

    0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 12, 7-10 hours: 5, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

    81% (22 of 27) of students answered some questions.

  • 5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

    19/241

    Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 19

    AMATH310/EARTH310 Section 1 Poulin Francis

    Characteristics of the Instructor

    1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

    Excellent: 3, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

    Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 6, Just right: 4, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

    3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

    Excellent: 9, Good: 1, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

    Excellent: 2, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

    Excellent: 1, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 8, Most of the time: 2, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 0

    7) Did you find the course interesting?

    Very interesting: 6, Interesting: 3, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 0

    8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

    Excellent: 5, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    Characteristics of the Course

    9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

    90-100%: 11, 75-90%: 0, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

    10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

    11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 4, No opinion: 1

    12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 1, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 2, No opinion: 3

    13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

    Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 4, Okay: 6, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

    14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

    Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 6, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

    15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

    0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 8, 7-10 hours: 3, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

    61% (11 of 18) of students answered some questions.

  • 5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

    20/241

    Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 20

    AMATH331/PMATH331 Section 1 Andre Robert

    Characteristics of the Instructor

    1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

    Excellent: 30, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

    Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 9, Just right: 24, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

    3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

    Excellent: 22, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

    Excellent: 21, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

    Excellent: 28, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 11, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 3, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 17

    7) Did you find the course interesting?

    Very interesting: 14, Interesting: 18, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0

    8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

    Excellent: 29, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    Characteristics of the Course

    9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

    90-100%: 27, 75-90%: 6, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

    10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 18, Helpful: 15, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

    11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 6, No opinion: 1

    12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 17, Not helpful: 6, No text required: 2, No opinion: 2

    13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

    Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 11, Okay: 20, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

    14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

    Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 24, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

    15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

    0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 20, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0

    35% (34 of 97) of students answered some questions.

  • 5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

    21/241

    Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 21

    AMATH350 Section 1 Harmsworth David L

    Characteristics of the Instructor

    1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

    Excellent: 41, Good: 36, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

    Too High: 7, Somewhat too high: 25, Just right: 53, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

    3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

    Excellent: 49, Good: 27, Satisfactory: 10, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

    Excellent: 45, Good: 31, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

    Excellent: 52, Good: 26, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 23, Most of the time: 20, Often enough: 12, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 29

    7) Did you find the course interesting?

    Very interesting: 8, Interesting: 47, Not Interesting: 16, No opinion: 13

    8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

    Excellent: 45, Good: 35, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    Characteristics of the Course

    9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

    90-100%: 68, 75-90%: 13, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 2, < 25%: 0

    10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 36, Helpful: 49, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

    11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 17, Helpful: 56, Not helpful: 10, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 3

    12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 64, No opinion: 4

    13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

    Too much: 14, Somewhat too much: 27, Okay: 42, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 2

    14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

    Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 8, Okay: 74, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 1, No opinion: 0

    15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

    0-2 hours: 5, 3-6 hours: 64, 7-10 hours: 13, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 0

    61% (86 of 140) of students answered some questions.

  • 5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

    22/241

    Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 22

    AMATH350 Section 2 Harmsworth David L

    Characteristics of the Instructor

    1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

    Excellent: 50, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

    Too High: 6, Somewhat too high: 20, Just right: 41, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

    3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

    Excellent: 52, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

    4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

    Excellent: 46, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

    5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

    Excellent: 55, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 16, Most of the time: 13, Often enough: 6, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 34

    7) Did you find the course interesting?

    Very interesting: 9, Interesting: 43, Not Interesting: 14, No opinion: 3

    8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

    Excellent: 48, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    Characteristics of the Course

    9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

    90-100%: 53, 75-90%: 17, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

    10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 30, Helpful: 36, Not helpful: 4, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

    11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 13, Helpful: 45, Not helpful: 8, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 3

    12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 4, Helpful: 3, Not helpful: 3, No text required: 52, No opinion: 3

    13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

    Too much: 14, Somewhat too much: 18, Okay: 36, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

    14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

    Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 9, Okay: 55, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

    15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

    0-2 hours: 7, 3-6 hours: 49, 7-10 hours: 11, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 1

    67% (70 of 105) of students answered some questions.

  • 5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

    23/241

    Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 23

    AMATH351 Section 1 Ingalls Brian

    Characteristics of the Instructor

    1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

    Excellent: 30, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

    Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 36, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

    3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

    Excellent: 37, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

    Excellent: 23, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

    Excellent: 28, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 23, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 1, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 16

    7) Did you find the course interesting?

    Very interesting: 14, Interesting: 25, Not Interesting: 4, No opinion: 1

    8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

    Excellent: 35, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    Characteristics of the Course

    9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

    90-100%: 40, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

    10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 24, Helpful: 19, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

    11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 24, Not helpful: 5, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 4

    12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 36, No opinion: 2

    13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

    Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 37, Somewhat too little: 3, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

    14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

    Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 39, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

    15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

    0-2 hours: 4, 3-6 hours: 24, 7-10 hours: 12, 11-15 hours: 2, > 15 hours: 0

    69% (44 of 64) of students answered some questions.

  • 5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

    24/241

    Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 24

    AMATH442 Section 1 Lanson Nathalie

    Characteristics of the Instructor

    1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

    Excellent: 4, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

    Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 10, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

    3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

    Excellent: 10, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

    Excellent: 3, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

    5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

    Excellent: 5, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 6, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 4

    7) Did you find the course interesting?

    Very interesting: 5, Interesting: 10, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0

    8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

    Excellent: 6, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    Characteristics of the Course

    9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

    90-100%: 13, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

    10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 8, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

    11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 0, No printed course notes: 3, No opinion: 1

    12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 6, No opinion: 6

    13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

    Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 11, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

    14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

    Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 12, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

    15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

    0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 12, 7-10 hours: 3, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

    76% (16 of 21) of students answered some questions.

  • 5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

    25/241

    Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 25

    AMATH456 Section 1 Siegel David

    Characteristics of the Instructor

    1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

    Excellent: 7, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

    Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 19, Somewhat too low: 3, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

    3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

    Excellent: 7, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

    Excellent: 4, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

    Excellent: 3, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 5, Most of the time: 3, Often enough: 7, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 13

    7) Did you find the course interesting?

    Very interesting: 4, Interesting: 20, Not Interesting: 3, No opinion: 1

    8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

    Excellent: 3, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    Characteristics of the Course

    9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

    90-100%: 22, 75-90%: 3, 50-75%: 3, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

    10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 14, Not helpful: 2, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 2

    11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 18, Not helpful: 3, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 4

    12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 15, No opinion: 4

    13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

    Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 0, Okay: 25, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

    14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

    Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 5, Okay: 22, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

    15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

    0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 16, 7-10 hours: 7, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 1

    70% (28 of 40) of students answered some questions.

  • 5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

    26/241

    Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 26

    AMATH463/AMATH663 Section 1 Poulin Francis

    Characteristics of the Instructor

    1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

    Excellent: 15, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

    Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 16, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

    3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

    Excellent: 17, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

    Excellent: 14, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

    Excellent: 14, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 10, Most of the time: 4, Often enough: 0, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 5

    7) Did you find the course interesting?

    Very interesting: 14, Interesting: 4, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0

    8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

    Excellent: 17, Good: 2, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    Characteristics of the Course

    9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

    90-100%: 17, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

    10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

    11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 6, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 0

    12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 5, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 8, No opinion: 4

    13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

    Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 17, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

    14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

    Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 3, Okay: 15, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

    15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

    0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 9, 7-10 hours: 10, 11-15 hours: 0, > 15 hours: 0

    76% (19 of 25) of students answered some questions.

  • 5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

    27/241

    Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 27

    AMATH473/AMATH673/PHYS454 Section 1 Konig Robert

    Characteristics of the Instructor

    1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

    Excellent: 4, Good: 14, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

    2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

    Too High: 1, Somewhat too high: 12, Just right: 6, Somewhat too low: 2, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

    3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

    Excellent: 8, Good: 10, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

    Excellent: 4, Good: 12, Satisfactory: 4, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

    Excellent: 7, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 5, Most of the time: 7, Often enough: 4, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 5

    7) Did you find the course interesting?

    Very interesting: 10, Interesting: 10, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0

    8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

    Excellent: 7, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    Characteristics of the Course

    9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

    90-100%: 19, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 1, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

    10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 12, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

    11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 1, No printed course notes: 0, No opinion: 1

    12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 0, Helpful: 2, Not helpful: 0, No text required: 19, No opinion: 0

    13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

    Too much: 2, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 16, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

    14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

    Too much: 3, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 5, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

    15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

    0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 6, 7-10 hours: 9, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 2

    64% (21 of 33) of students answered some questions.

  • 5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

    28/241

    Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 28

    CO227 Section 1 Roh Patrick Young

    Characteristics of the Instructor

    1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

    Excellent: 11, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

    Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 3, Just right: 17, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

    3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

    Excellent: 6, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 7, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

    Excellent: 10, Good: 5, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

    Excellent: 9, Good: 8, Satisfactory: 3, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 4, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 5, Not often enough: 1, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 5

    7) Did you find the course interesting?

    Very interesting: 2, Interesting: 11, Not Interesting: 7, No opinion: 0

    8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

    Excellent: 7, Good: 9, Satisfactory: 5, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    Characteristics of the Course

    9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

    90-100%: 18, 75-90%: 1, 50-75%: 2, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

    10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 10, Helpful: 10, Not helpful: 1, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

    11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 2, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 6, No printed course notes: 5, No opinion: 1

    12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 3, Helpful: 4, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 9, No opinion: 1

    13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

    Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

    14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

    Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 1, Okay: 17, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

    15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

    0-2 hours: 1, 3-6 hours: 13, 7-10 hours: 6, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 0

    47% (21 of 45) of students answered some questions.

  • 5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

    29/241

    Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 29

    CO250 Section 1 Wormald Nick

    Characteristics of the Instructor

    1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

    Excellent: 5, Good: 21, Satisfactory: 16, Unsatisfactory: 10, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

    2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

    Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 31, Somewhat too low: 14, Too low: 0, No opinion: 2

    3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

    Excellent: 12, Good: 18, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 7, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 2

    4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

    Excellent: 6, Good: 19, Satisfactory: 21, Unsatisfactory: 4, Very poor: 3, No opinion: 0

    5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

    Excellent: 8, Good: 20, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 10, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 0

    6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 5, Most of the time: 10, Often enough: 8, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 28

    7) Did you find the course interesting?

    Very interesting: 1, Interesting: 35, Not Interesting: 14, No opinion: 3

    8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

    Excellent: 6, Good: 23, Satisfactory: 13, Unsatisfactory: 12, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    Characteristics of the Course

    9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

    90-100%: 41, 75-90%: 9, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

    10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 9, Helpful: 38, Not helpful: 5, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

    11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 12, Helpful: 33, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 2, No opinion: 3

    12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 2, No text required: 37, No opinion: 5

    13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

    Too much: 7, Somewhat too much: 13, Okay: 31, Somewhat too little: 2, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

    14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

    Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 18, Okay: 29, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 2

    15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

    0-2 hours: 2, 3-6 hours: 31, 7-10 hours: 15, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 2

    51% (54 of 105) of students answered some questions.

  • 5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

    30/241

    Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 30

    CO250 Section 2 Gary Au

    Characteristics of the Instructor

    1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

    Excellent: 16, Good: 35, Satisfactory: 12, Unsatisfactory: 2, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

    Too High: 5, Somewhat too high: 13, Just right: 40, Somewhat too low: 5, Too low: 0, No opinion: 1

    3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

    Excellent: 23, Good: 28, Satisfactory: 11, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

    4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

    Excellent: 14, Good: 31, Satisfactory: 15, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

    5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

    Excellent: 11, Good: 34, Satisfactory: 14, Unsatisfactory: 3, Very poor: 2, No opinion: 1

    6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 11, Most of the time: 12, Often enough: 12, Not often enough: 2, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 28

    7) Did you find the course interesting?

    Very interesting: 13, Interesting: 37, Not Interesting: 10, No opinion: 4

    8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

    Excellent: 13, Good: 38, Satisfactory: 9, Unsatisfactory: 5, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    Characteristics of the Course

    9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

    90-100%: 43, 75-90%: 17, 50-75%: 4, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

    10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 46, Not helpful: 6, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 0

    11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 15, Helpful: 40, Not helpful: 7, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 1

    12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 6, Helpful: 11, Not helpful: 4, No text required: 37, No opinion: 4

    13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

    Too much: 4, Somewhat too much: 17, Okay: 42, Somewhat too little: 1, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

    14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

    Too much: 9, Somewhat too much: 16, Okay: 39, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

    15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

    0-2 hours: 3, 3-6 hours: 29, 7-10 hours: 25, 11-15 hours: 3, > 15 hours: 1

    61% (65 of 107) of students answered some questions.

  • 5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

    31/241

    Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 31

    CO255 Section 1 Geelen James F

    Characteristics of the Instructor

    1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

    Excellent: 13, Good: 7, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

    Too High: 0, Somewhat too high: 5, Just right: 16, Somewhat too low: 0, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

    3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

    Excellent: 9, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 1

    4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

    Excellent: 14, Good: 6, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

    Excellent: 18, Good: 3, Satisfactory: 0, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 8, Most of the time: 1, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 10

    7) Did you find the course interesting?

    Very interesting: 14, Interesting: 6, Not Interesting: 1, No opinion: 0

    8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

    Excellent: 15, Good: 4, Satisfactory: 1, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    Characteristics of the Course

    9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

    90-100%: 19, 75-90%: 2, 50-75%: 0, 25-50%: 0, < 25%: 0

    10) Was the assigned work (assignments, projects, etc) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 11, Helpful: 9, Not helpful: 0, No work assigned: 0, No opinion: 1

    11) Were the printed notes (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 7, Helpful: 7, Not helpful: 4, No printed course notes: 1, No opinion: 2

    12) Was the required textbook (if any) helpful in learning the course content?

    Very helpful: 1, Helpful: 0, Not helpful: 1, No text required: 18, No opinion: 1

    13) Did the course introduce an appropriate amount of new material?

    Too much: 1, Somewhat too much: 2, Okay: 18, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 0

    14) Was the amount of assigned work required for the course appropriate?

    Too much: 0, Somewhat too much: 6, Okay: 14, Somewhat too little: 0, Too little: 0, No opinion: 1

    15) On average, how many hours per week did you spend on this course outside of lectures?

    0-2 hours: 0, 3-6 hours: 13, 7-10 hours: 4, 11-15 hours: 1, > 15 hours: 2

    68% (21 of 31) of students answered some questions.

  • 5/28/2018 UW Mathematics Professor Evaluations for Fall 2012

    32/241

    Fall 2012 Course Evaluations Page 32

    CO330 Section 1 Katz Eric

    Characteristics of the Instructor

    1) Evaluate the organization and coherence of the lectures:

    Excellent: 5, Good: 17, Satisfactory: 6, Unsatisfactory: 1, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    2) At what level were the instructors explanations aimed?

    Too High: 6, Somewhat too high: 7, Just right: 15, Somewhat too low: 1, Too low: 0, No opinion: 0

    3) Evaluate the instructors treatment of students questions:

    Excellent: 16, Good: 11, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    4) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors visual presentation (blackboard, overheads, etc.)

    Excellent: 7, Good: 13, Satisfactory: 8, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 1, No opinion: 0

    5) Evaluate the effectiveness of the instructors oral presentation:

    Excellent: 12, Good: 15, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    6) Was the instructor available for help outside class?Always: 7, Most of the time: 6, Often enough: 2, Not often enough: 0, Never: 0, I did not seek help: 14

    7) Did you find the course interesting?

    Very interesting: 8, Interesting: 18, Not Interesting: 2, No opinion: 1

    8) Evaluate the overall effectiveness of the instructor as a teacher:

    Excellent: 11, Good: 16, Satisfactory: 2, Unsatisfactory: 0, Very poor: 0, No opinion: 0

    Characteristics of the Course

    9) What proportion of the lectures did you attend in this course?

    90-100%: 26, 75-90%: 3, 50-7