UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (http://dare.uva.nl)

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

Issues in growth curve modeling

Stoel, R.D.

Link to publication

Citation for published version (APA):Stoel, R. D. (2003). Issues in growth curve modeling. TT-Publikaties.

General rightsIt is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s),other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).

Disclaimer/Complaints regulationsIf you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, statingyour reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Askthe Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam,The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.

Download date: 30 Jan 2021

Literature Literature

Aber,, M. S., & McArdle, J .J. (1991). Latent growth curve approaches to modeling the developmentt of competence. In M. Chandler (1991). Criteria for competence: ControversiesControversies in the conceptualization and assessment of children's abilities, (pp. 2311 258). Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Er lbaum Associates, Inc.

Arbuckle,, J. L. (1999). Amos 4, [Computer software]. Chicago: Smallwaters Corp. Aiken,, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: testing and interpreting

interactions.interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Andersen,, J. C, & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice:

AA review and recommended two step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 4 1 1-423. .

Bandalos,, D. L. (2002). The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameterr estimate bias. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 78-102.

Baker,, P. C, Keck, C. K., Mott, F. L., & Quinlan, S. V. (1993). NLSYchild handbook:

aa guide to the 1986-1990 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth child data. Columbus,, OH: Center for Human Resource Research.

Baltes,, P. B., & Nesselroade, J.R. (1979). History and rationale of longitudinal research.. In J.R. Nesselroade & P.B. Baltes (Eds.), Longitudinal research in the studystudy of behavior and development (pp. 1-39). New York: Academic Press.

Bechger,, T.M. (1997). Methodological aspects of comparison of educational achievement:achievement: the case of reading literacy. Doctoral Dissertation, Amsterdam: TT-publications. .

Berkhoff,, J. & Snijders, T.A.B. (2001). Variance component testing in multilevel models.. Journal of Educational and behavioral Statistics, 26, 133-152.

Bock,, R.D. (1979). Univariate and multivariate analysis of variance of time-structuredd data. In J.R. Nesselroade & P.B. Baltes (Eds.), Longitudinal research inin the study of behavior and development (pp. 199-231). New York: Academic Press. .

Boekaerts,, M. (1993). Being concerned with well-being and with learning. EducationalEducational Psychologist, 28, 149-167.

Boekaerts,, M. (2001). Context sensitivity: activated motivational beliefs, current concernss and emotional arousal. In S. Volet & S. Jarvela (Eds.), Motivation in

107 7

learninglearning contexts; theoretical advances and methodological implications, (pp. 17-31).. Amsterdam: Pergamon.

Bollen,, K.A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley. Browne,, M.W. (1982). Covariance st ructures. In D.M. Hawkins (Ed.), Topics in

appliedapplied multivariate analysis (pp. 72-141). Cambridge: University Press. Browne,, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit .

SociologicalSociological Methods & Research, 21, 230-258. Browne,, M. & DuToit, S. (1991). Analysis of learning curves. In L. Collins & J.L.

Hornn (Eds.), Best methods for the analysis of change. Washington, DC: Americann Psychological Association.

Browne,, W.J., & Rasbash, J. (2002). Multilevel Modelling. To appear in A. Bryman, & M.. Hardy (Eds.), Handbook of Data Analysis.

Bryk,, A.S., & Raudenbush S.W. (1987). Application of hierarchical linear models too assessing change. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 147-158.

Bryk,, A.S., & Raudenbush S.W. (1992). Hierarchical Linear Models in Social and BehavioralBehavioral Research: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Newbury Park,

CA:: Sage . Bryk,, A.S., & Raudenbush S.W. & Congdon, R. (1999). HLM5: Hierarchical

LinearLinear and Nonlinear Modeling, [Computer Software]. Chicago: Scientific Software. .

Byrne,, B.M., Shavelson, R.J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factorr covariance and meanstructures: the issue of partial measurement invariance.. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456-466.

Chan,, D. (1998). The conceptualization and analysis of change over time: An integrativee approach incorporating longitudinal mean and covariance st ructures analysiss (LMACS) and multiple indicator latent growth modeling (MLGM). OrganizationalOrganizational Research Methods, 1, 421-483.

Chan,, D.( Ramey, S., Ramey, C, & Schmitt, N. (2000). Modeling intraindividual changess in chi ldren's social skills at home and at school: a multivariate latent growthh approach to understanding between-settings differences in children's sociall skill development. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 365-396.

Chou,, C.P., Bentler, P.M., & Pentz, M.A. (1998). Comparison of two statistical approachess to study growth curves. Structural Equation Modeling, 5, 247-266.

Cur ran,, P.J. (1997). The bridging of quantitative methodology and applied developmentall research. In P.J. Curran (Chair), Comparing three modern approachesapproaches to longitudinal data analysis: An examination of a single developmentaldevelopmental sample. Symposium conducted at the 1997 meeting of the Societyy for Research on Child Development, Washington, DC.

Dee Leeuw, J., & Kreft, I.G.G. (1986). Random Coefficient Models for Multilevel Analysis.. Journal of Educational Statistics, 11, 57-86.

Dee Pijper, W.M., & Saris, W.E. (1982). The effect of identification restrictions on the testt statistics in latent variable models. In K.G. Jöreskog & H. Wold (Eds.), SystemsSystems under indirect observation, part 1. Amsterdam: North Holland.

Doddema-Winsemius,, H. & Werf, M.P.C, van der (1989). Selectie/constructie van toetsentoetsen voor sociale redzaamheid en intelligentie ten behoeve van evaluatie OVB; EindrapportEindrapport [Selection/construction of tests for social ability and intelligence for

108 8

thee purpose of the evaluation of the Educational Priority Areas policy; Final report].. Groningen: RION, University of Groningen.

Dolan,, CV. & Molenaar, P.C.M. (1994). Testing specific hypotheses concerning latent groupp differences in multi-group covariance structure analysis with st ructured means.. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 203-222.

Drasgow,, F. (1987). Study of the measurement bias of two standardized psychologicall tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 19-29.

Driessen,, G. Langen, A. van & Oudenhoven, D. (1994). De toetsen voor het cohort PrimairPrimair Onderwijs [The tests for the cohort study Primary Education], Nijmegen: ITS,, University of Nijmegen.

Driessen,, G., Langen, A. van & Vierke, H. (2000). Basisonderwijs: veldwerkverslag, leerlinggegevensleerlinggegevens en oudervragenlijst. Basisrapportage PRIMA-cohortonderzoek. DerdeDerde meting 1998/99 [Primary education: research report, pupil 's data and parent 'ss questionary. Base report PRIMA cohort study. Third wave 1998/99]. Nijmegen:: ITS, University of Nijmegen.

Duncan,, S.C., Duncan, T.E., & Hops, H. (1996). Analysis of longitudinal data within acceleratedd longitudinal designs. Psychological Methods, 1, 236-248.

Duncan,, T.E., Duncan, S.C., Strycker, L.A., Li , F., & Alpert, A. (1999). An introductionintroduction to latent growth curve modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Mahwah,, NJ: Lawrence Er lbaum Associates.

Eccles,, J .S. & Midgley, C. (1989). Stage/environment fit : Developmentally appropriatee classrooms for early adolescents. In R. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), ResearchResearch on motivation in education (Vol. 3, pp. 139-181). New York: Academic Press. .

Eliason,, S.R. (1993). Maximum Likelihood Estimation: logic and practice. Thousand oaks,, CA: Sage.

Enders,, C.K., & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximumm likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. StructuralStructural Equation Modeling, 8, 430-457.

Fears,, T.R., Benichou, J. & Gail, M.H. (1996). A reminder of the fallibilit y of the Wald statistic.. The American Statistician, 50, 226-227.

Fennema,, E. (1984). Girls, woman, and mathematics. In E. Fennema & M.J. Ayer (Eds.),, Women and education (pp. 137-164). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.

Fennema,, E. & Sherman, J. (1977). Sex-related differences in mathemat ics achievement,, spatial visualization and affective factors. American Educational

ResearchResearch Journal, 14, 51-71. Finkei,, S.E. (1995). Causal analysis with panel data.Thousand Oaks: Sage Garst,, H. (2000). Longitudinal research using structural equation modeling applied in

studiesstudies of determinants of psychological well-being and personal initiave in East GermanyGermany after the unification. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam. .

Garst,, H., Frese, M., & Molenaar, P.C.M. (2000). The temporal factor of change in stressor-strainn relationships: A growth curve model on a longitudinal s tudy in Eastt Germany. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 417-438.

Goldstein,, H. (1986). Multilevel mixed linear model analysis using iterative generalisedd least squares. Biometrika, 73, 43-56.

109 9

Goldstein,, H. (1987). Multilevel Models in Educational and Social Research. London: Griffin . .

Goldstein,, H. (1995). Multilevel statistical models. London: Edward Arnold. Golembiewski,, R.T., Billingsley, K., & Yeager, S. (1976). Measuring change and

persistencee in h u m an affairs: Types of change generated by OD designs. Journal ofof Applied Behavioural Science, 12(2), 133-157.

Gottfried,, A.E., Fleming, J .S. & Gottfried, A.W. (2001). Continuity of academic intr insicc motivation from childhood through late adolescence: a longitudinal study.. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 3-13.

Ghisletta,, P. & McArdle, J .J. (2001). Latent growth curve analysis of the development off height. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 531-555.

Hall,, R.J., Snell, A.F., & Foust, M.S. (1999). Item parceling strategies in SEM: Investigatingg the subtle effects of unmodeled secondary constructs. OrganizationalOrganizational Research Methods, 2(3), 233-256.

Hancock,, G. R., Kuo, W.L., & Lawrence, F. R. (2001). An il lustration of second-order latentt growth models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 470-489.

Hofman,, A., Jong, U. de, Leeuwen, M. van, Berg, M. van den, Boom, J. de, Graaf, D. dee & Roeleveld, R. (2001). Studentenmonitor 2000 [Student monitor 2000]. Zoetermeer:: Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cul tuur en Wetenschappen.

Horn,, J.L. & McArdle, J .J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariancee in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18, 117-144

Hox,, J . J. (2000). Multilevel analysis of grouped and longitudinal data. In T. D. Little, K.. U. Schnabel, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data (pp.. 15-32). Mahwah: Lawrence Er lbaum.

Hox,, J . J. (2002). Multilevel anaysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah: Lawrence Er lbaum. .

Hox,, J .J ., & Maas, C.J.M. (2001). The accuracy of multilevel structural equation modelingg with pseudobalanced groups and small samples. Structural Equation Modeling,Modeling, 8, 157-174.

Jöreskog,, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (1988). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications.applications. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.

Jöreskog,, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (2002). LISREL 8.52, [Computer Software]. Chicago: Scientificc Software.

Jungb lu th,, P. & Meijnen, W. (1994). Cohortstudie Primair Onderwijs. Masterplan: kernpuntenkernpunten van opzet en uitvoering [Cohort study Primary Education. Master plan:: central points in planning and execution]. Nijmegen: ITS, University of Nijmegen. .

Jungb lu th,, P., Langen, A. van, Peetsma, T. & Vierke, H. (1996). Leerlinggegevens basisonderwijsbasisonderwijs en speciaal onderwijs. Technische rapportage PRIMA-cohortonderzoekcohortonderzoek 1994/95 [Pupil's data regular and special primary education. Technicall report of the PRIMA cohort study 1994/95]. Amsterdam/ Nijmegen: SCO-Kohnstammm Inst i tuut/ ITS.

Jungb lu th,, P., Roede, E. & Roeleveld, J. (2001). Validering van het PRIMA-leerlingprofiel.leerlingprofiel. [Validation of the PRIMA Pupil's Profile]. Amsterdam: SCO-Kohnstammm Inst i tuut, Universiteit van Amsterdam.

110 0

Kenny,, D.A. & Campbell, D.T. (1989). On the measurement of stability in over-time data.. Journal of Personality, 57, 445-481.

Kessler,, R.C. & Greenberg, D.F. (1981). Linear panel analysis. New York: Academic

Press. . Kurdek,, L.A. & Sinclair, R.J. (2001). Predicting reading and mathematics

achievementt in fourth-grade children from kindergarten readiness scores. JournalJournal of Educational Psychology, 93, 451-455.

Laird,, N.M., 8c Ware, J.H. (1982). Random effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics,Biometrics, 38, 963-974.

Lazarsfeld,, P.F. (1948). Communication research and the social psychologist. Inn D. Wayne (Ed), Current trends in social psychology, (pp. 218-273). Oxford: U. Pit tsburghh Press.

Lazarsfeld,, P.F. 8s Fiske, M. (1938). The 'panel' as a new tool for measur ing opinion. PublicPublic Opinion Quarterly, 2, 596-612.

Li ,, F., Duncan, T.E., & Acock, A. (2000). Modeling interaction effects in latent growth curvee models. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 497-533.

Li ,, F., Duncan, T.E., Duncan, S. C. 8B Acock, A. (2001). Latent growth modeling of longitudinall data: A finite growth mixture modeling approach. Structural Equation

Modeling,Modeling, 8, 493-530. Li ,, F., Duncan, T.E., Duncan, S. C, McAuley, E., Chaumeton, N. R., 8& Harmer, P.

(2001).. Enhancing the psychological well-being of elderly individuals through Taii Chi exercise: A latent growth curve analysis. Structural Equation Modeling,

8,8, 53-83. Li ,, F., Duncan, T.E., Harmer, P., Acock, A. 8& Stoolmiller, M. (1998). Analyzing

measurementt models of latent variables through multilevel confirmatory factor analysiss and hierarchical modeling approaches. Structural Equation Modeling, 5, 294-306. .

Littell ,, Milliken , Stroup and Wolfinger (1996) SAS System for Mixed Models. Cary, NC:: SAS Insti tute.

Little,, R.J.A., & Rubin, D.B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley. .

Little,, T.D. (1997). Mean and covariance st ructures (MACS) analyses of cross-culturall data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32,32, 53-76.

Little ,, T.D., Schnabel, K.U., St Baumert, J. (Eds.). (2000). Modeling longitudinal and multilevell data: practical issues, applied approaches, and specific examples. Mahwah:: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Loehlin,, J. C. (1987). Latent Variable Models. Baltimore: Lawrence Erlbaum. Long,, S. C. (1984). Confirmatory factor analysis. London: Sage. Longford,, N.T. (1987). A fast scoring algorithm for maximum likelihood estimation in

unbalancedd mixed models with nested effects. Biometrika, 74, 817-827. Longford,, N.T. (1993). Random coefficients models. Oxford, UK: Clarendon. Lubke,, G.H. 8& Dolan, C.V. (2002). Can unequal residual variances across

groupsgroups mask measurement invariance in the common factor model?. Manuscript acceptedd for publication.

I l l l

Lubke,, G.H., Dolan, C.V., Kelderman, H., & Mellenbergh, G.J. (2001). Absence of measurementmeasurement bias with respect to unmeasured variables: An implication od strict factorialfactorial invariance. Manuscript submit ted for publication.

MacCallum,, R.C., Kim, C, Malarkey, W.B., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J.K. (1997). Studying mult ivariatee change us ing multilevel models and latent growth curve models. MultivariateMultivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 215-253.

Maehr,, M.L. & Braskamp, L.A. (1986). The motivation factor; A theory of personal investment.investment. Lexington, Massachusetts/Toronto: Lexington Books.

Malone,, T., & Lepper, M.R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivationss for learning. In R. Snow, & M. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instructioninstruction (Vol. 3, pp. 223-253). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Mandys,, F., Dolan, C.V., & Molenaar, P.C.M. (1994). Two aspects of the simplex model:: Goodness of fi t to linear growth curve structures and the analysis of meann t rends. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 19, 201-215.

Mavrogenes,, N.A. & Bezruczko, N. (1993). Influences on writing development. JournalJournal of Educational research, 86, 237-245.

McArdle,, J .J. (1986). Latent variable growth within behavior genetic models. BehaviorBehavior Genetics, 16(1), 163-200.

McArdle,, J .J. (1988). Dynamic but structural equation modeling of repeated measuress data. In R. B. Cattel, & J. Nesselroade (Eds.), Handbook of multivariatemultivariate experimental psychology (2nd ed., pp. 561-614). New York: Plenum Press. .

McArdle,, J .J. (1989). Structural modeling experiments using multiple growth functions.. In P. Ackerman, R. Kanfer & R. Cudeck (Eds.), Learning and individualindividual differences: Abilities, Motivation and Methodology (pp. 71-117). Hillsdale,, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

McArdle,, J .J. (1994). St ructural factor analysis experiments with incomplete data. MultivariateMultivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 409-454.

McArdle,, J . J. (2001). A latent difference score approach to longitudinal dynamic s t ructurall analysis. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit & D. Sörbom (Eds.) Structural equationequation modeling: Present and future (pp. 341-380). Chicago: Scientific Softwaree International.

McArdle,, J .J. Anderson, E. (1990) . Latent variable growth models for research on aging.. In Birren, J. E. Schaie, K. W., Handbook of the Psychology of Aging (pp.21-44).. New York : Academic Press.

McArdle,, J .J ., & Bell, R. Q. (2000). An introduction to latent growth models for developmentall data analysis. InT.D. Little, K.U. Schnabel, & J .Baumert (Eds.), ModelingModeling longitudinal and multilevel data (pp. 69-108). Mahwah: Lawrence Er lbaum. .

McArdle,, J .J. & Cattell, B.R. (1994). Structural equation models of factorial invariancee in parallel proportional profiles and oblique confactor problems. MultivariateMultivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 63-113.

McArdle,, J .J ., & Epstein, D. (1987). Latent growth curves within developmental s t ructurall equation models. Child Development, 58, 110-133.

112 2

McArdle,, J .J. & Hamagami, F. (1991). Modeling incomplete longitudinal and cross-sectionall data. In L.M. Collins & J.L. Horn (Eds.), Best methods for the analysis ofof change (pp. 276-304). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

McArdle,, J .J. & Hamagami, F. (1992). Modeling incomplete longitudinal and cross-sectionall data using latent growth structural models. Experimental Aging Research,Research, 18, 145-166.

McArdle,, J .J. & Hamagami, F. (1996). Modeling incomplete longitudinal and cross-sectionall data using latent growth structural models. Experimental Aging Research,Research, 18, 145-166.

McDonald,, R.P. (1985). Factor analysis and related methods. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaumm Associates.

Mehta,, P.D., & West, S. G. (2000). Putt ing the individual back into growth curves. PsychologicalPsychological Methods, 5, 23-41.

Meijer,, J. (2001). Learning potential and anxious tendency: test anxiety as a bias factorr in educational testing. Anxiety, stress and coping: an international journal, 14,14, 337-362.

Mellenbergh,, G.J., Kelderman, M., Stijlen, J.G. & Zondag, E. (1979). Linear models forr the analysis and construct ion of inst ruments in a facet design. Psychological Bulletin,Bulletin, 86, 766-776.

Meredith,, W. (1964). Notes on factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 29, 177-185 Meredith,, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis, and factorial

invariance.. Psychometrika, 58, 525-543. Meredith,, W., & Horn, J. (2001). The role of factorial invariance in modeling growth

andd change. L.M. Collins and A.G. Sayer (Eds.) New methods for the analysis of changechange (pp. 203-240). Washington, DC : APA.

Meredith,, W.M., & Tisak, J. (1984). "Tuckerizing" curves. Paper presented at the annuall meeting of the psychometric society, Santa Barbara, CA.

Meredith,, W.M., & Tisak, J. (1990). Latent curve analysis. Psychometrika, 55, 107-122. .

Meyerr & Fennema, (1986, April) . Gender differences in the relationships between affectiveaffective variables and mathematical achievement. Paper presented at the annuall meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco,, CA.

Mooney,, C. Z. & Duval, R. D. (1993). Bootstrapping: A nonparametric approach to statisticalstatistical inference. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Muthén,, B. (1994). Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociological Methods & Research,Research, 22, 376-398.

Muthén,, B. (1997). Latent variable modeling of longitudinal and multilevel data. A. Rafteryy (eds.), Sociological Methodology (pp. 453-480). Boston: Blackwell Publishers. .

Muthén,, B. (2000). Methodological issues in random coefficient growth modeling usingg a latent variable framework: Applications to the development of heavy drinking.. J. Rose, L. Chassin, C. Presson & J. Sherman (eds.), Multivariate ApplicationsApplications in Substance use Research (pp. 113-140). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

Muthén,, B. (2001). Second-generation structural equation modeling with a combinationn of categorical and cont inuous latent variables: New opportunit ies

113 3

forr latent class-latent growth modeling. In L.M. Collins & A.G. Sayer (Eds.). New methodsmethods for the analysis of change (pp. 291 322). Washington, DC,: American Psychologicall Association.

Muthén,, B. (2002). Beyond SEM: General latent variable modeling. Behaviormetrika,

29,, 81-117. Muthén,, B., Kaplan, D., & Hollis, M. (1987). On st ructural equation modeling with

da taa that are not missing completely at random. Psychometrika, 52, 431-462. Muthén,, B., & Khoo, S. (1998). Longitudinal studies of achievement growth using

latentt variable modeling. Learning and Individual Differences, 10, 73-102. Muthén,, L.K. & Muthén, B.O. (1998). Mplus 1.04 [Computer software]. Los Angeles:

Muthénn & Muthén. Muthén,, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (2001). Mplus : the comprehensive modeling program

ff or applied researchers : user's guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén. Muthén,, B. & Shedden, K. (1999). Finite mixture modeling with mixture outcomes

us ingg the EM algorithm. Biometrics, 55, 463-469. Neale,, M.C. (2002). MX32, [Computer software]. Richmond: Department of

Psychiatry. . Nicholls,, J.G. (1978). The development of the concepts of effort and ability,

perceptionn of own attainment, and the understanding that difficul t tasks requiree more ability. Childdevelopment, 49, 800-814.

Oort,, F.J. (1996). Using restricted factor analysis in test construction. Unpublished Doctorall dissertat ion, University of Amsterdam.

Oort,, F.J. (2001). Three-mode models for multivariate longitudinal data. British JournalJournal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 54, 49-78.

Peetsma,, T.T.D. (1992). Toekomst als motor?; toekomstperspectieven van leerlingen in hethet voortgezet onderwijs en hun inzet voor school [The future as an incentive? Secondd school s tudents' perspectives concerning their future and their personal investmentt in school]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, SCO, Universiteit van Amsterdam,, Amsterdam.

Peetsma,, T.T.D. (1997, August). Decline in pupils' motivation during secondary education.education. Paper presented at the Seventh European Conference for Research onn Learning and Instruction, Athens.

Peetsma,, T.T.D. (2000). Future time perspective as a predictor of school investment. ScandinavianScandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 44, 179-194.

Pentz,, M. A., & Chou, Ch. P. (1994). Measurement invariance in longitudinal clinical researchh assuming change from development and intervention. Journal of ConsultingConsulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 450-462.

Pintrich,, P.R. (2000). Multipl e goals, mult iple pathways: The role of goal orientation i nn learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544-555.

Plewis,, I. (1996). Statistical methods for unders tand ing cognitive growth: a review, a synthesiss and an application. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology,Psychology, 49, 25-42.

Plewis,, I. (2000). Evaluating Educational Interventions Using Multilevel Growth Curves:: The Case of Reading Recovery. Educational Research and Evaluation, 6, 83-101. .

114 4

Rabe-Hesketh,, S., Pickles, A. and Skrondal, A. (2001). GLLAMM Manual. Technical Reportt 2001, Department of Biostatistics and Computing, Institute of

Psychiatry,, King's College, London. Rao,, C.R. (1958). Some statistical methods for comparison of growth curves.

Biometrics,Biometrics, 14, 1-17. Raudenbushh S.W., & Bryk, A.S. (2002). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and

DataData Analysis Methods. Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Raudenbushh S.W., & Chan, W.S. (1992). Growth curve analysis in accelerated

longitudinall designs. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 29, 387-

411. . Raudenbushh S.W., & Chan, W.S. (1993). Application of a hierarchical linear model

tothee study of adolescent deviance in an overlapping cohort design. Journal of

ConsultingConsulting and Clinical Psychology, 6, 941-951. Raudenbushh S.W., Rowan B., & Kang S.J. (1991). A Multilevel, Multivariate Model

forr Studying School Climate with Estimation via the EM Algorithm and Applicationn to U.S. High-School Data. Journal of Educational Statistics , 16,

295-330. . Rasbash,, J., Browne, W, Healy, M., Cameron, B. & Charlton, C. (2000). MLwiNl.1 0

[Computerr software]. London: Multilevel Models Project Insti tute of Education. Raykov,, T. & Marcoulides, G.A. (2000). A First Course in Structural Equation

Modeling.Modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Roede,, E. (1989). Explaining student investment; an investigation of high school

students'students' retrospective causal accounts of their investment in school. Unpublished doctorall dissertation, SCO, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam.

Roeleveld,, J. & Portengen (1998). Uitval en instroom bij het PRIMA-cohortonderzoek [Losss and intake in the PRIMA cohort study]. Amsterdam: SCO-Kohnstamm Inst i tuut,, Universiteit van Amsterdam.

Rogosa,, D.R. (1979). Causal models in longitudinal research: Rationale, formulation,, and interpretation. In J.R. Nesselroade and P.B. Baltes (Eds.), LongitudinalLongitudinal methodology in the study of behavior and development (pp. 263-302).. New York: Academic Press.

Rogosa,, D. (1995). Myths and methods: "Myths about longitudinal research" plus supplementall quest ions. In J. M. Gottman (Ed.), The analysis of change (pp. 3-66).. New Jersey: Mahwah.

Rogosa,, D., Brandt, D., & Zimowski, M. (1982). A growth curve approach to the measurementt of change. Quantitative Methods in Psychology, 92, 726-748.

Rogosa,, D. & Willett, J. B. (1985). Understanding correlates of change by modeling individuall differences in growth. Psychometrika, 50, 203-228.

Rovine,, M.J., & Molenaar, P.C.M. (1998). A nonstandard method for estimating a linearr growth model in LISREL. International Journal of Behavioral Development,

22,22, 453-473. Rovine,, M.J., & Molenaar, P.C.M. (2000). A structural modeling approach to a

multilevell random coefficients model. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 5 1-

88. . Rovine,, M.J., & Molenaar, P.C.M. (2001). A structural equations modeling approach

too the general linear mixed model. In L. Collins & A. Sayer (Eds.), New Methods

115 5

forfor the Analysis of Change (pp. 65-96). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. .

Rudinger,, G., & Rietz, C. (1998). The neglected time dimension? Introducing a longitudinall model testing latent growth curves, stability, and reliability as time boundd processes. Methods of Psychological Research Online [On-line serial], 3. Retrievedd October 12, 1999, ht tp: / /www.ppm. ipn.uni -k ie l .de/mpr/ issue5 .

Saris,, W.E. (1978). Introduction to the use of linear structural equation models in non-experimentalexperimental research. Research Report, Amsterdam: Free University Amsterdam. .

Sayer,, A.G., & Cumsille, P.E. (2001). Second-order latent growth models. In L.M. Collinss & A. G. Sayer (Eds.), Neiv methods for the analysis of change (pp. 179-200). .

Seiffert,, T.L. & O'Keefe, B.A. (2001). The relationship of work avoidance and learning goalss to perceived competence, externality and meaning. British journal of educationaleducational psychology, 71, 81-92.

Singer,, J .D. (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models,, and individual growth curve models. Journal of Educational and BehavioralBehavioral Statistics, 24, 323-355.

Skaalvik,, E.M. & Valas, H. (1999). Relations among achievement, self-concept, and motivationn in Mathematics and Language Arts: A longitudianal study. Journal of ExperimentalExperimental Education, 67, 135-149.

Snijders,, T.A.B. (1996). Analysis of longitudinal data using the hierarchical linear model.. Quality and Quantity, 30, 405-426.

Snijders,, T.A.B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic andand advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage .

Steyer,, R., Eid, M. & Schwenkmezger, P. (1997). Modeling true intraindividual change:: True change as a latent variable. Methods of Psychological Research OnlineOnline [On-line serial], 2. Retrieved October 12, 1999, from ht tp : / /www.ppm. ipn.un i -k ie l .de/mpr / issue4. .

Steyer,, R., Partchev, I. & Shanahan, M. (2000). Modeling true intra-individual changee in st ructural equation models: The case of poverty and chi ldren's psychosociall adjustment. In T. D. Little, K. U. Schnabel, & J. Baumert. (Eds.),, Modeling longitudinal and multiple-group data: Practical issues, applied approaches,approaches, and specific examples (pp. 109-126). Hillsdale, NJ: Er lbaum.

Stoell R.D., Peetsma, T.T.D. & Roeleveld, J. (2003). Relations between the developmentt of school investment, self-confidence and language achievement in elementaryy education: a multivariate latent growth curve approach. Learning andand individual differences, 13, 313-333.

Stoel,, R.D., & Van den Wittenboer, G. (2003). Time dependence of growth parameters inn latent growth curve models with time invariant covariates. Methods of PsychologicalPsychological Research, 8, 21-41.

Stoell R.D., van den Wittenboer, G. & Hox J .J. (2003a). Analyzing longitudinal data usingusing multilevel regression and latent growth curve analysis. To appear in Metodologiaa de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, 5, 21-42

116 6

Stoel,, R.D., van den Wittenboer, G. & Hox, J .J. (2003b). Including time-invariant covariatess in the latent growth curve model. To appear in Structural Equation Modeling. Modeling.

Stoel,, R.D., van den Wittenboer, G. & Hox, J .J. (2003c). Methodological issues in thee application of the latent growth curve model. To appear in K. van Montfort, H.. Oud, and A. Satorra (Eds.). Recent developments in structural equation modeling:modeling: Theory and applications. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Press

Stoolmiller,, M. (1995). Using latent growth curve models to study developmental processes.. In J. M. Gottman (Ed.), The analysis of change (pp. 103-138). New Jersey:: Mahwah.

Tucker,, L.R. (1958). Determination of parameters of a functional relation by factor analysis.. Psychometrika, 23, 19-23.

Vandenberg,, R.J., & Lance, C.E. (2000). A Review and synthesis of the measurement invariancee literature: Suggestions, practices and recommendat ions for organizationall research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4-70.

Vann der Leeden, R. (1998). Multilevel analysis of longitudinal data, in C.C.J.H. Bijleveld,, & L. J. Th. Van der kamp (Eds.), Longitudinal data analysis (pp. 269-317).. London: Sage.

Vann der Leij. A. (1985). Uitgangspunten van een geconcentreerde aanpak. [Principles off a concentrated approach] In A. van der Leij (Ed.), Zorgverbreding; bijdragen aanaan speciaal onderwijs aan basisonderwijs. Nijkerk: INTRO.

Verhelst,, N.D., Glas, C.A.W.& Verstralen, H.H.F.M. (1993). OPLM: One Parameter LogisticLogistic Model. Computerprogram and manual. Arnhem: CITO.

Vierke,, H. (1995). De PRIMA toetsen gecalibreerd [Calibration of the PRIMA tests]. Nijmegen:: ITS, University of Nijmegen.

Vonesh,, E.F. & Chinchilli, V. M. (1997). Linear and nonlinear models for the analysis ofof repeated measurements. New York: Marcel Dekker.

Vorst,, H.C.M. (1985). SVL normen per leerling, per klas en per vraag [SVL s tandards byy student, by class, and by question]. Nijmegen: Berkhout.

Vroom,, V.H. (1964). Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley. Wen,, Z., Marsh, H.W. & Hau, K.T. (2002). Interaction effects in growth modeling: A

fulll model. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 20-39. Willett ,, J .B., & Sayer, A.G. (1994). Using covariance structure analysis to detect

correlatess and predictors of individual change over time. Psychological Bulletin, 116,116, 363-381.

Willett ,, J.B., & Sayer, A.G. (1996). Cross-domain analyses of change over time: combiningg growth modeling and covariance structure analysis. In G.A. Marcoulides,, & R.E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling:modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 125-157). Mahwah, New Jersey: Er lbaum.

Williams,, L.J., & Anderson, S.E. (1994). An alternative approach to method effects by using latent-variablee models: Applications in organizational behavior research. Journal of AppliedApplied Psychology, 79, 323-331.

Wothke,, W. (2000). Longitudinal and multi-group modeling with missing data. Inn T.D. Little, K.U. Schnabel, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal andand multilevel data (pp. 219-240). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Er lbaum Associates. .

117 7

118 8