Utility theory microeco

12
The Consumer Theory How Consumers Make Choices under Income Constraints

description

 

Transcript of Utility theory microeco

Page 1: Utility theory microeco

The Consumer Theory

How Consumers Make Choices under Income Constraints

Page 2: Utility theory microeco

Some Questions • What is behind a consumer’s demand curve? • How do consumers choose from among various consumer

“goods”? • What determines the value of a consumer good?

Page 3: Utility theory microeco

Utility • The value a consumer places on a unit of a good or service

depends on the pleasure or satisfaction he or she expects to derive form having or consuming it at the point of making a consumption (consumer) choice.

• In economics the satisfaction or pleasure consumers derive from the consumption of consumer goods is called “utility”.

• Consumers, however, cannot have every thing they wish to have. Consumers’ choices are constrained by their incomes.

• Within the limits of their incomes, consumers make their consumption choices by evaluating and comparing consumer goods with regard to their “utilities.”

Page 4: Utility theory microeco

Our basic assumptions about a “rational” consumer:

• Consumers are utility maximizers• Consumers prefer more of a good (thing) to less of it. • Facing choices X and Y, a consumer would either prefer

X to Y or Y to X, or would be indifferent between them. • Transitivity: If a consumer prefers X to Y and Y to Z, we

conclude he/she prefers X to Z• Diminishing marginal utility: As more and more of good

is consumed by a consumer, ceteris paribus, beyond a certain point the utility of each additional unit starts to fall.

Page 5: Utility theory microeco

How to Measure Utility

Measuring utility in “utils” (Cardinal): • Jack derives 10 utils from having one slice of pizza but only 5 utils from

having a burger.

• In many introductory microeconomics textbooks this approach to measuring utility is still considered effective for teaching purposes.

Measuring utility by comparison (Ordinal): • Jill prefers a burger to a slice of pizza and a slice of pizza to a hotdog. Often consumers are able to be more precise in expressing their preferences.For example, we could say: • Jill is willing to trade a burger for four hotdogs but she will give up only two

hotdogs for a slice of pizza. • We can infer that to Jill, a burger has twice as much utility as a slice of pizza,

and a slice of pizza has twice as much utility as a hotdog.

Page 6: Utility theory microeco

Utility and Money • Because we use money (rather than hotdogs!) in just about

all of our trade transactions, we might as well use it as our comparative measure of utility.

(Note: This way of measuring utility is not much different from measuring utility in utils) • Jill could say: I am willing to pay $4 for a burger, $2 for a

slice of pizza and $1 for a hotdog. Note: Even though Jill obviously values a burger more (four times as much) than a hot dog, she may still choose to buy a hotdog, even if she has enough money to buy a burger, or a slice of pizza, for that matter. (We will see why and how

shortly.)

Page 7: Utility theory microeco

Total Utility versus Marginal Utility

• Marginal utility is the utility a consumer derives from the last unit of a consumer good she or he consumes (during a given consumption period), ceteris paribus.

• Total utility is the total utility a consumer derives from the consumption of all of the units of a good or a combination of goods over a given consumption period, ceteris paribus.

Total utility = Sum of marginal utilities

Page 8: Utility theory microeco

The Law of Diminishing Marginal Utility • Over a given consumption period, the more of a good a

consumer has, or has consumed, the less marginal utility an additional unit contributes to his or her overall satisfaction (total utility).

• Alternatively, we could say: over a given consumption period, as more and more of a good is consumed by a consumer, beyond a certain point, the marginal utility of additional units begins to fall.

Page 9: Utility theory microeco

Total and Marginal Utility for Ice Cream

Q ($) TU ($) MU0 01 40 402 85 453 120 354 140 205 150 106 157 77 160 38 160 09 155 -510 145 -10

145

Page 10: Utility theory microeco

Total Utility

0

50

100

150

200

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

($) MU

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11

Q ($) TU ($) MU0 01 40 402 85 453 120 354 140 205 150 106 157 77 160 38 160 09 155 -510 145 -10

145

Page 11: Utility theory microeco

How much ice cream does Jill buy in a

month? Some facts of life: • Limited income• Opportunity cost of making a choice:

Buying ice cream leaves Jill less money to buy other things: each dollar spent on ice cream could be spent

on hamburger. • In fact, consumers compare the (expected) utility derived from

one additional dollar spent on one good to the utility derived from one additional dollar spent on another good.

Page 12: Utility theory microeco

More facts • The prices of hamburger and ice cream are market-

given; the consumer cannot change the price of a good.• Jill, like any other rational consumer, wishes to

maximize her utility. • The opportunity cost of one dollar spent on ice cream is

the forgone utility of one dollar that could be on hamburger.

• If the utility of one additional dollar of ice cream is greater than the utility of the last dollar spent on hamburger, Jill can increase her total utility by spending one dollar less on hamburger and one dollar more one ice cream.