Utility and Health Lecture 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker Daştan HEALTH ECONOMICS.

30
Utility and Health Lecture 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker Daştan HEALTH ECONOMICS

Transcript of Utility and Health Lecture 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker Daştan HEALTH ECONOMICS.

Page 1: Utility and Health Lecture 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker Daştan HEALTH ECONOMICS.

Utility and Health

Lecture 2Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker DaştanHEALTH ECONOMICS

Page 2: Utility and Health Lecture 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker Daştan HEALTH ECONOMICS.

1. How Health Economics?• How does health produce utility? (Next:

What affects health (lifestyle and medical care choices) ?)

• Services delivered in health care markets are not “goods,” they do not provide direct utility▫They may even have “bad” side effects

• Health as an economic good: stock (or capital) of health generates happiness/utility▫Derived demand for medical care▫Grossman, M., 1972, On the Concept of Health

Capital and the Demand for Health, Journal of Political Economy 80 (2): 223–255

Page 3: Utility and Health Lecture 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker Daştan HEALTH ECONOMICS.

Demand for Health• Health is like a durable good

▫Life starts with an inherent stock of health Different for each individual

• Utility = U(X, H)▫H is stock of health, X is other goods▫Health leads to utility

• Utility from X or H increases in a decreasing manner

• Utility from other goods increases with health• Utility from health increases with other goods• Indifference curves may be drawn identifying

different combinations of health and other goods with same utility

Page 4: Utility and Health Lecture 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker Daştan HEALTH ECONOMICS.
Page 5: Utility and Health Lecture 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker Daştan HEALTH ECONOMICS.
Page 6: Utility and Health Lecture 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker Daştan HEALTH ECONOMICS.

Production of Health• Individual himself produces health using

medical care (health produces utility)• The demand for the final product (health)

leads to derived demand for medical care to produce health

• Production function:▫H = g(m)

Where m is medical care – broadly defined Generally: g’(m) > 0 and g’’(m) < 0

• Benefits of medical care decrease with usage▫May even become negative

Page 7: Utility and Health Lecture 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker Daştan HEALTH ECONOMICS.

2. The Production of Health• H = g(m, D)

▫Where D is disease Impact of medical care depends on disease: disease

and medical care interact to determine health production

• Disease I: Health at mid-level, medical care provides some help (e.g. allergies, asthma)

• Disease II: Worst health but medical care restores health to a better level than DI (e.g. a broken leg)

• Disease III: A small health shock but medical care can’t do much either (e.g. common cold)

Page 8: Utility and Health Lecture 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker Daştan HEALTH ECONOMICS.
Page 9: Utility and Health Lecture 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker Daştan HEALTH ECONOMICS.

Characteristics of Medical Care• Marginal productivity of medical care falls,

while average productivity can be high• Medical care is not a homogeneous activity

▫Thousands of medical procedures, diseases, and injuries Current Procedural Terminology System International Classification of Diseases

• Medical care generally does not change ultimate outcome, but speeds the “cure”▫Or slows death: AIDS, some forms of cancer, or

Alzheimer’s disease• Outcomes of medical care is uncertain• Life style also matters

Page 10: Utility and Health Lecture 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker Daştan HEALTH ECONOMICS.

3. Health Through the Life Cycle• Aging: wearing/depreciation of the health stock• Life expectancy increased

▫ Public Health improvements▫ Medical care improvements

• Typical plot of health stock (Figure 2.4):▫ Decreasing trend with occasional troughs and

recoveries, until Hmin

• Aggregate annual death rate per 100,000 persons (29 between ages 1-4 and 13,000 over 85)▫ Technical change reduced these rates for most ages

(for ages 15-24, it’s mostly not technical change but reduction in drunk driving and improvement in vehicle safety)

• Heart attack (28.5%) and cancer (22.8%) comprise more than 50% of deaths in the US (2002 data)

Page 11: Utility and Health Lecture 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker Daştan HEALTH ECONOMICS.
Page 12: Utility and Health Lecture 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker Daştan HEALTH ECONOMICS.
Page 13: Utility and Health Lecture 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker Daştan HEALTH ECONOMICS.

A Model of Consumption and Health

•“You are what you eat”•“As you sow, so shall ye reap”•Smoking, alcohol consumption, use of drugs,

diet composition (high cholesterol foods), nature of sexual activities, amount of exercise

•H = g(XBAD, XGOOD, m) g’(XBAD)<0, g’(XGOOD)>0, g’(m)>0U’(XBAD) > 0

•These choices dominate a person’s health far more than the medical care system

Page 14: Utility and Health Lecture 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker Daştan HEALTH ECONOMICS.

A Model of Consumption and Health

•Between ages 15-24 (causes that comprise more than 75% ) (1999 data):▫Vehicle crashes▫Other accidents▫Homicide ▫Suicide

•Black males aged 15-24: death rate from homicide alone exceeds all causes of white males (1997 data)

•So medical care system is ineffective in such issues

Page 15: Utility and Health Lecture 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker Daştan HEALTH ECONOMICS.

A Model of Consumption and Health• Ages 65 and over, major causes of death

▫ Heart disease (smoking )▫ Cancer▫ Stroke▫ Lung disease (tobacco)

• In mid-ages, it’s a mix• Epidemiological data shows systematically

increased risk with lifestyle choices▫ Smoking one or more packs causes 2.5 times the risk

of a fatal heart attack, similar data for high blood pressure (salt, alcohol, stress), cholesterol (diet), no exercise

• Tobacco, diet/activity patterns and alcohol account for 3/8 of all deaths in the US (1990)

• Compare Nevada and Utah

Page 16: Utility and Health Lecture 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker Daştan HEALTH ECONOMICS.
Page 17: Utility and Health Lecture 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker Daştan HEALTH ECONOMICS.
Page 18: Utility and Health Lecture 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker Daştan HEALTH ECONOMICS.

More on lifestyleCauses of obesity (economics predicts these)• Technology -> Increase in marginal

productivity of workers, calories spent decline (2/3 of increase in BMI since 1960s, (Lakdawalla and Philipson, 2002) )▫ Increased value of time increases the

opportunity cost of exercise, encourages shift to fast food (with more women in workforce, time becomes more valuable, less home-cooking) Budget for restaurant meals was 1/3 of food

budget in 1970s, recently became ½ Larger portions were introduced starting from

1970s, obesity increases closely track these

Page 19: Utility and Health Lecture 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker Daştan HEALTH ECONOMICS.
Page 20: Utility and Health Lecture 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker Daştan HEALTH ECONOMICS.

Obesity

•Technology -> Increase in agricultural productivity and mass production and marketing of food (1/3)

•Density of restaurants per capita explain obesity the most (Chou et al. 2002)▫Number of fast-food restaurants per capita

doubled between 1970 and 1990, full service restaurants increased by 35%

Page 21: Utility and Health Lecture 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker Daştan HEALTH ECONOMICS.

Obesity•Linked to transportation

▫Courtemache (2007) shows higher gasoline prices cause weight loss $1/gallon increase reduces 16,000 fatalities

per year and saves $17 bn in health care costs (400 mn/d gallons are consumed -- $145 bn spent annually)

•Coggon et al. (2001) estimate that ¼ of all knee surgeries could be eliminated but for BMI under 25 in England

Page 22: Utility and Health Lecture 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker Daştan HEALTH ECONOMICS.

Obesity

•Obesity has strong effects on various forms of morbidity (Figure 2.7)

•Obese people spend 40% more on health care

•Obesity-related spending account for 10% of all health care spending

•Obese receive less wages, especially women (Cawley, 2004; Dastan, 2010)

Page 23: Utility and Health Lecture 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker Daştan HEALTH ECONOMICS.
Page 24: Utility and Health Lecture 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker Daştan HEALTH ECONOMICS.

Tobacco –why smoke?

•Stigler and Becker (1977) ▫de gustibus non est disputandum▫Rational individuals choose to be addicted

now and quit later in life•Lack of information

▫Decreases with education From ~30% to ~8% (college)

▫<3% for physicians Even health workers’ consumption decreases

with education

Page 25: Utility and Health Lecture 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker Daştan HEALTH ECONOMICS.

Alcohol

•Patterns and intensity matter for constant consumption

•Heavy drinking: ▫Liver cirrhosis▫Some cancers▫Heart disease▫D&D

•Type of alcohol matters▫Study on Danish adults (Gronbaek et al.,

2000):

Page 26: Utility and Health Lecture 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker Daştan HEALTH ECONOMICS.

Types of alcohol

• Heavy drinking (more than 21 drink per week) of beer and distilled spirits increases mortality from all causes and specifically▫Cancers (double the risk)▫Mixed results re: Coronary Heart Disease

• Wine reduces all-cause deaths by about 20%, even for heavy drinkers, heart disease by 50%▫Red wine is better than white wine due to

procyanadin in red wine (also in chocolate, cranberry juice, pomegranates)

• General alcohol use increases with education▫People with higher education tend to consume

healthier alcohol (Klatsky et al. 1990)

Page 27: Utility and Health Lecture 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker Daştan HEALTH ECONOMICS.
Page 28: Utility and Health Lecture 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker Daştan HEALTH ECONOMICS.

Alcohol and lifetime income

•Moderate consumption may increase lifetime income (Hamilton and Hamilton, 1997), heavy consumption decreases (Dastan, 2010)▫Through labor force participation, not wage

(Mullahy and Sindelar, 1993)• Income increases access to a healthier life as

well as to restaurants!▫Moreover, better health means higher

productivity and income

Page 29: Utility and Health Lecture 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker Daştan HEALTH ECONOMICS.

Education

•Could it be that both education and healthier lifestyle choices could depend on something more fundamental:▫Time preference differences

Economics stops here

Page 30: Utility and Health Lecture 2 Asst. Prof. Dr. İlker Daştan HEALTH ECONOMICS.