Uterine Fibroid Embolization

18
See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/12715957 Uterine fibroid embolization: Measurement of health-related quality of life before and after therapy ARTICLE in JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY · NOVEMBER 1999 Impact Factor: 2.15 · DOI: 10.1016/S1051-0443(99)70235-6 · Source: PubMed CITATIONS 68 DOWNLOADS 125 VIEWS 113 6 AUTHORS, INCLUDING: James B Spies Georgetown University 170 PUBLICATIONS 4,489 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Susan D Mathias Health Outcomes Solutions 88 PUBLICATIONS 2,300 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Available from: Susan D Mathias Retrieved on: 20 July 2015

description

Spies, James B., Elisabeth H. Warren, Susan D. Mathias, Sheila M. Walsh, Antoinette R. Roth, and Michael J. Pentecost. "Uterine Fibroid Embolization: Measurement of Health-Related Quality of Life Before and After Therapy." Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR 10, no. 10 (1999): doi:10.1016/s1051-0443(99)70235-6.

Transcript of Uterine Fibroid Embolization

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at:http://www.researchgate.net/publication/12715957Uterine fibroid embolization:Measurement of health-related qualityof life before and after therapyARTICLEinJOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY NOVEMBER 1999Impact Factor: 2.15 DOI: 10.1016/S1051-0443(99)70235-6 Source: PubMedCITATIONS68DOWNLOADS125VIEWS1136 AUTHORS, INCLUDING:James B SpiesGeorgetown University170 PUBLICATIONS 4,489 CITATIONS SEE PROFILESusan D MathiasHealth Outcomes Solutions88 PUBLICATIONS 2,300 CITATIONS SEE PROFILEAvailable from: Susan D MathiasRetrieved on: 20 July 2015J ames B. Spies M.D.Professor of RadiologyGeorgetown University School of MedicineWashington, DCUterine Fibroid EmbolizationEvidence-based ReviewFaculty DisclosureJ ames B. Spies, MDI have no financial relationships to disclose.Evidence-based Medcine Review of properly designed comparative trials to draw conclusions on therapies Study design characteristics Population defined, incl. and excl. criteria Power analysis included Properly randomized Blinded where possible Equal care and follow-up of participants Proper endpoints chosen Intent to treat analysisLiterature Search Uterine leiomyoma AND embolization Limits: Randomized clinical trials 17 articles from randomized studies 10 articles results of comparison to other therapies REST Trial (UFE vs Surgery, primarily hysterectomy) Emmy Trial (UFE vs Hysterectomy) (5 articles) Pinto Trial (UFE vs Hysterectomy) Mara Trial (UFE vs Myomectomy)(2 articles) Hald Trial (Lap. UA occlusion vs UFE)Literature Search 7 articles comparing technical aspects of UFE PVA vs Embospheres sPVA vs Embospheres Goserlin + UFE vs UFE alone Intra-arterial lidocaine vs none for pain management (2 articles) Serum markers after UFE vs myomectomyRandomized TrialsREST Trial* Randomized multi-center study in the UK 2:1 ratio of UFE to surgery patients UFE 106 patients Surgery 51 Hysterectomy 43 Myomectomy 8 Primary outcome measure scores on SF-36 at 1 year.*REST Investigators. Uterine artery embolization versus surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids. NEJ M 2007; 356: 360-370.Randomized TrialsREST Trial* Short-term Results UFE less painful at 24 hours (VAS of 3.0 vs 4.6, P