Utdallas.edu/~metin 1 Revenue Management Chapter 13.

28
1 utdallas.edu/~metin Revenue Management Chapter 13

Transcript of Utdallas.edu/~metin 1 Revenue Management Chapter 13.

Page 1: Utdallas.edu/~metin 1 Revenue Management Chapter 13.

1utdallas.edu/~metin

Revenue Management

Chapter 13

Page 2: Utdallas.edu/~metin 1 Revenue Management Chapter 13.

2utdallas.edu/~metin

Learning Goals

Yield management (with protection levels) and overbooking give demand flexibility where supply flexibility is not possible.

The Newsvendor model can be used:– Single decision in the face of uncertainty.

– Underage and overage costs.

Page 3: Utdallas.edu/~metin 1 Revenue Management Chapter 13.

3utdallas.edu/~metin

Revenue (Yield) Management

Page 4: Utdallas.edu/~metin 1 Revenue Management Chapter 13.

4utdallas.edu/~metin

Some U.S. airline industry observations Since deregulation in 78, 137 carriers have filed for bankruptcy until 2006. From 95-99 (the industry’s best 5 years ever) airlines earned 3.5 cents on each

dollar of sales:– The US average for all industries is around 6 cents.– From 90-99 the industry earned 1 cent per $ of sales.

Carriers typically fill 72.4% of seats while the break-even load is 70.4%.- Utilization is about 3% higher in 2007-08

perhaps due to flight cancellations. Gas prices are high and will remain so.

– Downsize airlines– Merge. Domestic/international– Alternate transportation means

» High speed train

Page 5: Utdallas.edu/~metin 1 Revenue Management Chapter 13.

5utdallas.edu/~metin

Matching supply to demand when supply is fixed

Examples of fixed supply:– Travel industries (fixed number of seats, rooms, cars, etc).

– Advertising time (limited number of time slots).

– Telecommunications bandwidth.

– Size of the MBA program.

– Doctor’s availability for appointments.

Revenue management is a solution:– If adjusting supply is impossible – adjust the demand!

– Segment customers into » High willingness to pay

» Low willingness to pay.

– Limit the number of tickets sold at a low price, i.e., control the average price by changing the mix of customers.

Page 6: Utdallas.edu/~metin 1 Revenue Management Chapter 13.

6utdallas.edu/~metin

Environments suitable for revenue management The same unit of capacity (e.g., airline seat) can be used to deliver

services to different customer segments (e.g., business and leisure customers) at different prices.

High gross margins (so the variable cost of additional sales is low). Perishable capacity (it cannot be stored) and limited capacity (all

possible customers cannot always be served). Capacity is sold in advance of demand: Costly adjustment of sold

capacity. There is an opportunity to segment customers (so that different prices

can be charged) and different segments are willing to pay different prices.

It is not illegal or morally irresponsible to discriminate the customers. Is Revenue management for incoming MBA class possible?

Page 7: Utdallas.edu/~metin 1 Revenue Management Chapter 13.

7utdallas.edu/~metin

Revenue Management:

Booking limits and protection levels

Page 8: Utdallas.edu/~metin 1 Revenue Management Chapter 13.

8utdallas.edu/~metin

The Park Hyatt Philadelphia 118 King/Queen rooms.

Hyatt offers a rL= $159 (low fare) discount fare for a

mid-week stay, targeting leisure travelers.

Regular fare is rH= $225 (high fare) targeting

business travelers.

Demand for low fare rooms is abundant. Let D be uncertain demand for high fare rooms.

– Suppose D has Poisson distribution with mean 27.3. Assume most of the high fare (business) demand

occurs only within a few days of the actual stay. Objective: Maximize expected revenues by

controlling the number of low fare rooms sold.

Page 9: Utdallas.edu/~metin 1 Revenue Management Chapter 13.

9utdallas.edu/~metin

Yield management decisions The booking limit is the number of rooms to sell in a fare class or lower. The protection level is the number of rooms you reserve for a fare class or

higher. Let Q be the protection level for the high fare class. Q is in effect while selling

low fare tickets. Since there are only two fare classes, the booking limit on the low fare class is

1. 118 – Q:– You will sell no more than 118-Q low fare tickets because you are protecting (or

reserving) Q seats for high fare passengers.

0 118

Q seats protected forhigh fare passengers

Sell no more than the low fare booking limit, 118 - Q

Page 10: Utdallas.edu/~metin 1 Revenue Management Chapter 13.

10utdallas.edu/~metin

The connection to the newsvendor

A single decision is made before uncertain demand is realized. There is an overage cost:

– D: Demand for high fare class; Q: Protection level for high fare class

– If D < Q then you protected too many rooms (you over protected) ...

– … so some rooms are empty which could have been sold to a low fare traveler.

There is an underage cost:– If D > Q then you protected too few rooms (you under protected) …

– … so some rooms could have been sold at the high fare instead of the low fare.

Choose Q to balance the overage and underage costs.

Page 11: Utdallas.edu/~metin 1 Revenue Management Chapter 13.

11utdallas.edu/~metin

Optimal protection level Overage cost:

– If D < Q we protected too many rooms and earn nothing on Q - D rooms.

– We could have sold those empty rooms at the low fare, so Co = rL.

Underage cost:– If D > Q we protected too few rooms.

– D – Q rooms could have been sold at the high fare but were sold instead at the low fare, so Cu = rH – rL

Optimal high fare protection level:

Optimal low fare booking limit = 118 – Q* Choosing the optimal high fare protection level is a Newsvendor

problem with properly chosen underage and overage costs.

H

LH

uo

u

r

rr

CC

CQF

)( *

Page 12: Utdallas.edu/~metin 1 Revenue Management Chapter 13.

12utdallas.edu/~metin

Hyatt example Critical ratio:

Poisson distribution with mean 27.3

– You can also use poisson(Q,mean=27.3,1)=0.29 Excel function to solve for Q.

Answer: 24 rooms should be protected for high fare travelers. Similarly, a booking limit of 118-24 = 94 rooms should be applied to low fare reservations.

225 159 660.2933

225 225u h l

o u h

C r r

C C r

Q F (Q ) L (Q ) Q F (Q ) L (Q ) Q F (Q ) L (Q )10 0.0001 17.30 20 0.0920 7.45 30 0.7365 1.0311 0.0004 16.30 21 0.1314 6.55 31 0.7927 0.7712 0.0009 15.30 22 0.1802 5.68 32 0.8406 0.5613 0.0019 14.30 23 0.2381 4.86 33 0.8803 0.4014 0.0039 13.30 24 0.3040 4.10 34 0.9121 0.2815 0.0077 12.31 25 0.3760 3.40 35 0.9370 0.1916 0.0140 11.31 26 0.4516 2.78 36 0.9558 0.1317 0.0242 10.33 27 0.5280 2.23 37 0.9697 0.0918 0.0396 9.35 28 0.6025 1.76 38 0.9797 0.0619 0.0618 8.39 29 0.6726 1.36 39 0.9867 0.04

Page 13: Utdallas.edu/~metin 1 Revenue Management Chapter 13.

13utdallas.edu/~metin

Related performance measure calculations

How many high-fare travelers will be refused a reservation?– Expected lost sales = 4.10, From Table 13.2

How many high-fare travelers will be accommodated?– Expected sales = Expected demand - Lost sales = 27.3 - 4.1 = 23.2

How many seats will remain empty?– Expected left over inventory = Q - Expected sales = 24 - 23.2 = 0.8.

What is the expected revenue assuming all low fare rooms are sold– $225 x Exp. Sales(=23.2) + $159 x Booking limit(=118-24=94) = $20,166.

– Without yield management worst case scenario is selling all the rooms at the low fare and making $159 x 118 = $18,762.

– With revenue management revenue increases by (20,166-18,762)/18,762=7.5%

Page 14: Utdallas.edu/~metin 1 Revenue Management Chapter 13.

14utdallas.edu/~metin

Example: Bulk Contracts Most consumers of production, warehousing, and transportation

assets face the problem of constructing a portfolio of long-term bulk contracts and short-term spot market contracts

– Long-term contracts for low cost

– Short-term contracts for flexibility The basic decision is the size of the bulk contract The fundamental trade-off is between wasting a portion of the low-

cost bulk contract and paying more for the asset on the spot market

Page 15: Utdallas.edu/~metin 1 Revenue Management Chapter 13.

15utdallas.edu/~metin

Example: Bulk Contracts

For the simple case where the spot market price is known but demand is uncertain, a formula can be used

cB = bulk rate

cS = spot market price

Q* = optimal amount of the asset to be purchased in bulk

Overage cost of buying too much in bulk: cB.

Underage cost of buying too little in bulk: cS- cB.

S

BS

uo

u

c

cc

CC

CQF

)( *

Page 16: Utdallas.edu/~metin 1 Revenue Management Chapter 13.

16utdallas.edu/~metin

Numerical Example for Bulk Contracts: Buying transportation capacity to bring goods from China

Bulk contract cost = cB = $10,000 per million units

Spot market cost = cS = $12,500 per million unitsNormal monthly Demand for transportation: = 10 million units, = 4 million units

Q* = Norminv((12.5-10/12.5),10,4) million units

The manufacturer should sign a long-term bulk contract for Q* million units per month and purchase any transportation capacity beyond that on the spot market.

Page 17: Utdallas.edu/~metin 1 Revenue Management Chapter 13.

17utdallas.edu/~metin

Revenue Management:

Overbooking

Page 18: Utdallas.edu/~metin 1 Revenue Management Chapter 13.

18utdallas.edu/~metin

Ugly reality: cancellations and no-shows Approximately 50% of reservations get cancelled at some point in

time. In many cases (car rentals, hotels, full fare airline passengers) there

is no penalty for cancellations. Problem:

– the company may fail to fill the seat (room, car) if the passenger cancels at the very last minute or does not show up.

Solution:– sell more seats (rooms, cars) than capacity.

Danger:– some customers may have to be denied a seat even though they have a

confirmed reservation.– Passengers who get bumped off overbooked domestic flights to receive

» Up-to $400 if arrive <= 2 hours after their original arrival time» Up-to $800 if arrive >= 2 hours after their original arrival time

– According to April 16, 2008 decision of the Transportation Department

Page 19: Utdallas.edu/~metin 1 Revenue Management Chapter 13.

19utdallas.edu/~metin

Hyatt’s Problem The forecast for the number of customers that do not show up

( X ) is Poisson with mean 8.5. The cost of denying a room to the customer with a confirmed

reservation is $350 in ill-will (loss of goodwill) and penalties. How many rooms (y) should be overbooked (sold in excess of

capacity)?

Newsvendor setup:– Single decision when the number of no-shows in uncertain.– Insufficient overbooking: Overbooking demand=X >y=Overbooked

capacity. – Excessive overbooking: Overbooking demand=X <y=Overbooked

capacity.

Page 20: Utdallas.edu/~metin 1 Revenue Management Chapter 13.

20utdallas.edu/~metin

Overbooking solution Underage cost when insufficient overbooking

– if X >y then we could have sold X-y more rooms…

– … to be conservative, we could have sold those rooms at the low fare, Cu = rL.

Overage cost when excessive overbooking– if X <y then we bumped y-X customers …

– … and incur an overage cost Co = $350 on each bumped customer.

Optimal overbooking level:

Critical ratio:

( ) .u

o u

CF Y

C C

1590.3124

350 159u

u o

C

C C

Page 21: Utdallas.edu/~metin 1 Revenue Management Chapter 13.

21utdallas.edu/~metin

Optimal overbooking level Poisson distribution with mean 8.5

Optimal number of overbooked rooms is y=7. Hyatt should allow up to 118+7 reservations. There is about F(6)=25.62% chance that Hyatt will find itself

turning down travelers with reservations.

Q F (Q ) Q F (Q )0 0.0002 10 0.76341 0.0019 11 0.84872 0.0093 12 0.90913 0.0301 13 0.94864 0.0744 14 0.97265 0.1496 15 0.98626 0.2562 16 0.99347 0.3856 17 0.99708 0.5231 18 0.99879 0.6530 19 0.9995

Page 22: Utdallas.edu/~metin 1 Revenue Management Chapter 13.

22utdallas.edu/~metin

Revenue Management:

Complications

Page 23: Utdallas.edu/~metin 1 Revenue Management Chapter 13.

23utdallas.edu/~metin

Revenue management challenges … Demand forecasting.

– Wealth of information from reservation systems but there is seasonality, special events, changing fares and truncation of demand data.

Dynamic decisions. Variable capacity:

– Different aircrafts, ability to move rental cars around.

Group reservations; Cargo overbooking. How to construct good “fences” to differentiate among customers?

– One-way vs round-trip tickets.

– Saturday-night stay requirement.

– Non-refundability.

– Advanced purchase requirements.

Multi-leg passengers/multi-day reservations for cars and hotels:

Page 24: Utdallas.edu/~metin 1 Revenue Management Chapter 13.

24utdallas.edu/~metin

A solution to the multi-leg customer: buckets

With segment control there are only three booking limits for the O’Hare-JFK leg, one for each fare class.

But an O’Hare-Heathrow customer may be more valuable, so you could have six booking limits, one for each fare-itinerary combination.

But that leads to many booking limits, so group similar fare-itineraries into buckets:

O’Hare

JFK

Heathrow

Fare classO'Hare to

JFKO'Hare to Heathrow

Y $724 $1,610M $475 $829Q $275 $525

Bucket Itinerary Fare class

0 O'Hare to Heathrow Y1 O'Hare to Heathrow M

O'Hare to JFK Y2 O'Hare to Heathrow Q

O'Hare to JFK M3 O'Hare to JFK Q

Page 25: Utdallas.edu/~metin 1 Revenue Management Chapter 13.

25utdallas.edu/~metin

Another solution to multi-legs: bid prices

Assign a bid price to each segment: A fare is accepted if it exceeds the sum of the bid prices on

the segments it uses:– For example, an O’Hare-JFK fare is accepted if it exceeds $290

– A O’Hare-Heathrow fare is accepted if it exceeds $290+$170 = $460

The trick is to choose good bid-prices.

O’Hare

JFK

Heathrow

Fare classO'Hare to

JFKO'Hare to Heathrow

Y $724 $1,610M $475 $829Q $275 $525

O'Hare to JFK JFK to HeathrowBid price $290 $170

Page 26: Utdallas.edu/~metin 1 Revenue Management Chapter 13.

26utdallas.edu/~metin

Summary

Yield management (with protection levels) and overbooking give demand flexibility where supply flexibility is not possible.

The Newsvendor model can be used:– Single decision in the face of uncertainty.

– Underage and overage costs.

These are powerful tools to improve revenue:– American Airlines estimated a benefit of $1.5B over 3 years.

– National Car Rental faced liquidation in 1993 but improved via yield management techniques.

– Delta Airlines credits yield management with $300M in additional revenue annually (about 2% of year 2000 revenue.)

Page 27: Utdallas.edu/~metin 1 Revenue Management Chapter 13.

27utdallas.edu/~metin

Summary of the Course Modules

– 1. Flow analysis

– 2. Formulations

– 3. Queues

– 4. Quality

– 5. Inventory

– 6. Revenue management

The efficient transformation of inputs into outputs to suitably satisfy customers.

Page 28: Utdallas.edu/~metin 1 Revenue Management Chapter 13.

28utdallas.edu/~metin

The End

My teaching is overYour learning is forever

Towards betterDo not give up ever