Using X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy to Investigate the ...

3
Using X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy to Investigate the Surface Treatment of Fabrics Chris Baily, Tim Nunney, Thermo Fisher Scientific, East Grinstead, UK Application Note 52372 Key Words K-Alpha, Coating, Fabric, Mapping, Surface Analysis, Surface Treatment, XPS The Thermo Scientific K-Alpha surface analysis system was used to investigate the surface treatment of a polyester fabric. Prior to the application of the fabric protector, the sample had been masked so that treated and untreated areas could be compared. The surface was imaged to determine the distribution of the chemistries. Introduction The modification of fabrics to add or enhance properties or performance is one of the most enduring areas of surface technology. Coatings have been applied to garments for many years to improve their waterproofing capabilities, or to condition fibres so that they feel softer to the touch. In more recent times, methods have been used to apply nanomaterials to the surface of fabrics in order to improve such properties as UV protection factor, anti-bacterial capabilities, or stain resistance. 1 X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy is an analytical technique which is particularly well-suited to investigating these types of samples. XPS, also known as ESCA (electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis) delivers chemical composition information from the outer 10 nm of the surface of a material. It is capable of analyzing both conducting and insulating samples without special sample preparation, meaning that fabrics and fibers can be easily investigated using the technique (for another example, see Application Note 52080 for a description of the analysis of metal nanoparticles dispersed upon a fabric support). Experimental Half of a 25 mm × 50 mm piece of polyester lint-free cloth was sprayed with a soft furnishings protector, allowed to dry in air and then mounted on the standard 60 mm × 60 mm K-Alpha sample holder using 4 clips as shown in Figure 1. Once dry, the location of the fabric protector is not optically visible, so its location can only be determined analytically. This sample was designed to simulate a possible production failure, where a transparent coating had not applied consistently to a fabric.

Transcript of Using X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy to Investigate the ...

Using X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy to Investigate the Surface Treatment of FabricsChris Baily, Tim Nunney, Thermo Fisher Scientific, East Grinstead, UK

Ap

plica

tion

No

te 5

23

72

Key WordsK-Alpha, Coating, Fabric, Mapping, Surface Analysis, Surface Treatment, XPS

The Thermo Scientific K-Alpha surface analysis system was used to investigate the surface treatment of a polyester fabric. Prior to the application of the fabric protector, the sample had been masked so that treated and untreated areas could be compared. The surface was imaged to determine the distribution of the chemistries.

IntroductionThe modification of fabrics to add or enhance properties or performance is one of the most enduring areas of surface technology. Coatings have been applied to garments for many years to improve their waterproofing capabilities, or to condition fibres so that they feel softer to the touch. In more recent times, methods have been used to apply nanomaterials to the surface of fabrics in order to improve such properties as UV protection factor, anti-bacterial capabilities, or stain resistance.1

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy is an analytical technique which is particularly well-suited to investigating these types of samples. XPS, also known as ESCA (electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis) delivers chemical composition information from the outer 10 nm of the surface of a material. It is capable of analyzing both conducting and insulating samples without special sample preparation, meaning that fabrics and fibers can be easily investigated using the technique (for another example, see Application Note 52080 for a description of the analysis of metal nanoparticles dispersed upon a fabric support).

ExperimentalHalf of a 25 mm × 50 mm piece of polyester lint-free cloth was sprayed with a soft furnishings protector, allowed to dry in air and then mounted on the standard 60 mm × 60 mm K-Alpha sample holder using 4 clips as shown in Figure 1. Once dry, the location of the fabric protector is not optically visible, so its location can only be determined analytically. This sample was designed to simulate a possible production failure, where a transparent coating had not applied consistently to a fabric.

A 400 µm X-ray spot was then used to analyze a point in each half of the sample to obtain quantified elemental data to compare the compositions of the untreated and treated areas of the sample. As the samples were insulating, the K-Alpha turnkey charge compensation system was used. This system replaces the electrons lost from the surface by the photoelectric effect, preventing a large surface charge accumulating which would distort the acquired data. It is not required for conducting samples, but is essential for the analysis of insulators. The K-Alpha system is extremely simple to use, while being fully capable of maintaining consistent analysis conditions across even the most challenging sample set.

A 16 mm × 12 mm area (indicated in green in Figure 1) was then mapped using a 400 µm X-ray spot and a 400 µm step size to determine the distribution of the elements across the surface. The 128-channel detector was employed in snapshot acquisition mode to record the C1s, O1s, Cl2p, F1s, N1s, Si2p and S2p regions at every analysis position, minimizing the required total acquisition time, whilst retaining chemical information.

ResultsThe survey scans, giving elemental quantification, from untreated and treated parts of the polyester sample are shown in Figure 2. The elemental composition of the untreated sample is consistent with cleaned polyester. The composition of the treated sample shows that the surface has changed dramatically. In particular, elements from compounds in the treatment can clearly be detected; fluorine and sulfur (from perfluorobutane sulfonic acid), silicon (from silicone) and nitrogen.

Atomic percent maps of the chemical states present in each of the elements detected in the survey scans are shown in Figure 3.

Figure 2: Overlay of survey scans on untreated and treated areas of the polyester sample

Figure 3: Atomic percent chemical maps of each chemical state over an interface area between treated and untreated parts of the sample

Figure 1: Mosaic view of polyester sample mounted on the K-Alpha sample holder

Element Untreated (At.%) Treated (At.%)

Carbon 71.8 54.3

Oxygen 27.7 25.0

Fluorine 0 9.0

Silicon 0 5.8

Nitrogen 0 4.7

Sulfur 0 1.1

Chlorine 0.5 0

The atomic percent chemical maps clearly show the untreated part of polyester in the top 3 mm, and the treated part in the lower section.

Averaged C1s spectra from the treated and untreated side of the sample are shown in Figure 4. The untreated C1s spectrum shows the expected components for polyester. The treated spectrum shows a reduction in the amount of C-O and C=O, which are highly characteris-tic of the ester groups in the untreated part of the sample, and an increase in C-F bonding, which comes from the backbone of the perfluorobutane sulfonic acid in the fabric protector.

These chemical maps can then be overlaid on the optical view of the sample, to create the chemical map overlay in Figure 5.

SummaryAs XPS is a quantifiable surface sensitive analytical technique, it is ideal for determining the areas where an invisible surface modification, such as a fabric protection coating, has been applied, and also for finding the amount of coating present. It can also be used for quality control of invisible coatings on fabrics and other materials to determine whether they have been applied uniformly.

AcknowledgementsThermo Fisher Scientific would like to thank Tom Ross, a student at Oakwood School, Horley, UK, for his work in preparing and analyzing the fabric samples during his work experience placement with the company.

References1. D. Mihailovic et al., Cellulose (2011), 18, 811-825

Figure 4: Averaged C1s spectra from the treated and untreated side of the sample

Ap

plica

tion

No

te 5

23

72

Figure 5: Atomic percent chemical maps overlaid on the optical image of the sample

AN52372_E 09/12M

Africa +27 11 822 4120Australia +61 3 9757 4300Austria +43 1 333 50 34 0Belgium +32 53 73 42 41Canada +1 800 530 8447China +86 10 8419 3588

Denmark +45 70 23 62 60Europe-Other +43 1 333 50 34 0Finland/Norway/Sweden +46 8 556 468 00France +33 1 60 92 48 00Germany +49 6103 408 1014

India +91 22 6742 9434Italy +39 02 950 591Japan +81 45 453 9100Latin America +1 561 688 8700Middle East +43 1 333 50 34 0Netherlands +31 76 579 55 55

New Zealand +64 9 980 6700Russia/CIS +43 1 333 50 34 0Spain +34 914 845 965Switzerland +41 61 716 77 00UK +44 1442 233555USA +1 800 532 4752

www.thermoscientific.com©2012 Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. All rights reserved. All trademarks are the property of Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. and its subsidiaries. This information is presented as an example of the capabilities of Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. products. It is not intended to encourage use of these products in any manners that might infringe the intellectual property rights of others. Specifications, terms and pricing are subject to change. Not all products are available in all countries. Please consult your local sales representative for details.