USE OF OER – LESSONS FROM THE PHEA-ETI KENYATTA UNIVERSITY EXPERIENCE
description
Transcript of USE OF OER – LESSONS FROM THE PHEA-ETI KENYATTA UNIVERSITY EXPERIENCE
USE OF OER – LESSONS FROM THE PHEA-ETI KENYATTA UNIVERSITY EXPERIENCE
By Dr. Michael Wainaina,Associate Dean,
Graduate School,Kenyatta University.
1. Digitization of Past Examination Papers2. Creation of Chemistry and Communication
Skills e-Learning Modules 3. Digitization of Thesis (A pilot Project)4. Online Executive MBA Project5. Common Research Methodology e-Course –
Presentation focuses on this Project
Projects by K.U.
A Common Research Methodology Course (CRMC)e-Course to meet the 35 hour contact requirement for a University course
Faculty would develop the Unit themselves for ownership
Content developers were identified by the Deans of Schools (K.U. has thirteen teaching Schools)
They were identified through a participatory process for their “expertise”
Output Description & Operational Parameters
Approved CRMC description: CRMC Course Outline CRMC content developers identified CRMC Content Developed Facilitators Identified Facilitators trained
Outputs of the Participative Process
Engagement with OER Requested and Received existing OER on
Research Methodology from SAIDE
OER – 37 Rows Resource Name
URL Description Copyright Conditions
Topics
OER Resources
Successful Educational Research
No URL – copy of resource has been received.
These Guidelines were developed in the context of a wider project aimed in part at developing research and research capacity in teacher education.
The copyright for this work is held by Roger Deacon, Ben Parker and the Centre for EducationPolicy Development. However, to maximise distribution and application, the work is licensedunder a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. To view a copy ofthis licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0
Research Proposal, Research Questions, Planning and Management, Funding Research, Publishing Research
What were we to do with the materials? We reviewed it and forwarded it “as is
where is” to the content developers!! With wisdom of hindsight it is clear now the
this is not a very productive approach!!
Use of OER
We should have done a needs assessment of the requirements of the Content developers ensuring that developers were clear about what they needed or did not need and/or
We should have interrogated the materials received with a view to:◦ Sift through the materials with the Content developers to
identify relevant information◦ Explore the materials as a resource for content
development based on the requirements and set parameters of the CRMC
◦ Identify and address any challenges the content developers may have had in using the materials
◦ Review usefulness of the materials in meeting needs of CRMC as conceived for Kenyatta University
Looking back, what should we have done?
What did the Content developers do with the material?
We don’t know! While we ultimately produced good
material, we cannot say the extent that OER contributed to the quality, if at all.
That OER is an opportunity to re-engage with the process of course development
That information is available, in fact there is a glut of it and the challenge is to manage it to meaningfully, effectively and optimally work for your needs and context: Need to plan, adopt and evaluate the use of OER in Curriculum development…We cannot assume that the fact that the material is available it is necessary and sufficient
What are lessons of the exercise?
◦The illiterates of the 21st Century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, un-learn and re-
learn…Alvin Toffler
OER demands a New Literacy
How do we ensure that we optimally use OER in collaborative curriculum and course
content development projects?
It will be productive for the PHEA-ETI projects working with OER to deliberately investigate this question and document lessons learnt
with a view of scaling up best practice.
Opportunity for learning
OER as a Resource…Who Has More Muscles?
THANK YOU