US Shoot Americans

download US Shoot Americans

of 4

Transcript of US Shoot Americans

  • 8/14/2019 US Shoot Americans

    1/4

    US Shoot on Site Order Issued For Escaping Americans

    By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers August 19, 2007

    In yet another devastating blow to the embattled, and imprisoned, American

    people, FSB reports to the Kremlin are detailing that the Americas top lawenforcement officer, US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, is set to

    propose at the upcoming North American Summit that:

    Canadian Border Guards be granted the same

    rights as the their Mexican counterparts to

    shoot on site any American citizen found

    fleeing across their common border.

    The United States has, likewise, granted this right to Mexican Border Guardsin their just signed new border agreement on terrorism, and which U.S.

    Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Ralph Basham stated, [This]agreement represents a mutual desire of the United States and Mexico toprotect their people and economies.

    This latest move by the American Attorney General Gonzales is based upon

    Canadas recent decision, for the first time in their history, to allow the

    arming of their Border Guards, and as we can read as reported by the Globe

    and Mail News Service:

    "The first of Canada's border guards to be authorized to carry weapons onthe job graduated Friday after attending training in both Ottawa andChilliwack, B.C.

    The government hopes to have at least 250 and 300 border guards armedand on the job by August 2008, with hundreds more added in each of thefollowing years.

    The 2006 federal budget provided the border services agency with $101-million over two years to begin the process of providing border servicesofficers with firearms."

    The convoluted logic of Attorney General Gonzales, and as it pertains to the rights of the American

    people, were best stated by himself in testimony before the United States Senate this year when he spoke

    on what was once the Americans most cherished right ofhabeas corpusby stating:

    "The fact that the Constitution again, there is no express grant of habeas in the Constitution. There isa prohibition against taking it away."

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberto_Gonzaleshttp://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/08/14/america/LA-GEN-Mexico-US-Customs.phphttp://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/08/14/america/LA-GEN-Mexico-US-Customs.phphttp://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/08/14/america/LA-GEN-Mexico-US-Customs.phphttp://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070728.warmedguards0728/BNStory/National/homehttp://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070728.warmedguards0728/BNStory/National/homehttp://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070728.warmedguards0728/BNStory/National/homehttp://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070728.warmedguards0728/BNStory/National/homehttp://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070728.warmedguards0728/BNStory/National/homehttp://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070728.warmedguards0728/BNStory/National/homehttp://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070728.warmedguards0728/BNStory/National/homehttp://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070728.warmedguards0728/BNStory/National/homehttp://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070728.warmedguards0728/BNStory/National/homehttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15220450/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberto_Gonzales#Denial_of_right_to_habeas_corpus_in_the_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberto_Gonzales#Denial_of_right_to_habeas_corpus_in_the_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberto_Gonzales#Denial_of_right_to_habeas_corpus_in_the_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberto_Gonzales#Denial_of_right_to_habeas_corpus_in_the_http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15220450/http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070728.warmedguards0728/BNStory/National/homehttp://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070728.warmedguards0728/BNStory/National/homehttp://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070728.warmedguards0728/BNStory/National/homehttp://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070728.warmedguards0728/BNStory/National/homehttp://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070728.warmedguards0728/BNStory/National/homehttp://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070728.warmedguards0728/BNStory/National/homehttp://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070728.warmedguards0728/BNStory/National/homehttp://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070728.warmedguards0728/BNStory/National/homehttp://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070728.warmedguards0728/BNStory/National/homehttp://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/08/14/america/LA-GEN-Mexico-US-Customs.phphttp://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/08/14/america/LA-GEN-Mexico-US-Customs.phphttp://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/08/14/america/LA-GEN-Mexico-US-Customs.phphttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberto_Gonzales
  • 8/14/2019 US Shoot Americans

    2/4

    These FSB reports further point out that these new rights for foreign border guards to begin killingfleeing American citizens is consistent with the legal thinking of Attorney General Gonzales, and has

    been further verified by the American Civil Liberties Union, and who stated in their report on the him:

    "As White House counsel, Alberto Gonzales was pivotal in getting the USA Patriot Act drafted andrapidly passed through Congress. The Patriot Act is a law that allows officials unchecked license toinvestigate, arrest, detain and interrogate anyone on the grounds of suspicion of terrorism.

    Gonzales first gained national notoriety by paving the legal groundwork that led to the torture of USdetainees at Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo and other sites. He authored a 2002 memo to the President inwhich he termed the war on terror a "new kind of war" that makes the Geneva Convention internationalstandards for treatment of prisoners "obsolete" and "quaint.

    Though illogical, these reports state that Attorney General Gonzales decision to allow the killing of

    Americans fleeing their country is consistent with his prior views that because the United States is such

    a good Nation it can be automatically assumed that anyone found trying to cross a borderundetected must, therefore, be a terrorist.

    In an America currently being ruled by the dictate of what are called Executive Orders by theirPresident, the views of the present American War Administration can best be summed by President

    Bush himself, and as we can read as quoted by Washingtons Capital Hill Blues News Service in this

    exchange between Bush and his aides:

    "GOP leaders told Bush that his hardcore push to renew the more onerous provisions of the act could further alienate conservatives still mad at the President from his botched attempt to nominate WhiteHouse Counsel Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court.

    I dont give a goddamn, Bush retorted. Im the President and the Commander-in-Chief. Do it myway.

    Mr. President, one aide in the meeting said. There is a valid case that the provisions in this lawundermine the Constitution.

    Stop throwing the Constitution in my face, Bush screamed back. Its just a goddamned piece ofpaper!

    Even more frightening, perhaps, to the American people are the horrific new powers just granted

    Attorney General Gonzales by the US Congress which allows him, and him alone, to bypass the United

    States Federal Court System to seek the immediate execution of any American citizen, and as we can

    read as reported by the Associated Press News Service:

    "Today's paper sports a headline that would almost be laughable were it not so deadly serious. Itannounces that under a little noticed provision of the Patriot Act, the attorney general is seeking toexercise powers granted to him to "fast track" state executions of prisoners on death row.

    Alberto Gonzales? A man whose judgment has been questioned by friend and foe alike, who remains inhis job only because his lame duck boss is impervious to criticism, now given new life-and-death power?This at a time when DNA evidence has repeatedly been used to prove the imperfections of the system ofdetermining guilt, and medical questions about lethal injection as a method of execution have led tomoratoriums in several states?

    http://www.aclu.org/http://usliberals.about.com/od/peopleinthenews/a/AGonzales1_2.htmhttp://usliberals.about.com/od/peopleinthenews/a/AGonzales1_2.htmhttp://usliberals.about.com/od/peopleinthenews/a/AGonzales1_2.htmhttp://usliberals.about.com/od/peopleinthenews/a/AGonzales1_2.htmhttp://usliberals.about.com/od/peopleinthenews/a/AGonzales1_2.htmhttp://usliberals.about.com/od/peopleinthenews/a/AGonzales1_2.htmhttp://usliberals.about.com/od/peopleinthenews/a/AGonzales1_2.htmhttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20292810/http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7779.shtmlhttp://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7779.shtmlhttp://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7779.shtmlhttp://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7779.shtmlhttp://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7779.shtmlhttp://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7779.shtmlhttp://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7779.shtmlhttp://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7779.shtmlhttp://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7779.shtmlhttp://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7779.shtmlhttp://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7779.shtmlhttp://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7779.shtmlhttp://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7779.shtmlhttp://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7779.shtmlhttp://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7779.shtmlhttp://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7779.shtmlhttp://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7779.shtmlhttp://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7779.shtmlhttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20292810/http://usliberals.about.com/od/peopleinthenews/a/AGonzales1_2.htmhttp://usliberals.about.com/od/peopleinthenews/a/AGonzales1_2.htmhttp://usliberals.about.com/od/peopleinthenews/a/AGonzales1_2.htmhttp://usliberals.about.com/od/peopleinthenews/a/AGonzales1_2.htmhttp://usliberals.about.com/od/peopleinthenews/a/AGonzales1_2.htmhttp://usliberals.about.com/od/peopleinthenews/a/AGonzales1_2.htmhttp://usliberals.about.com/od/peopleinthenews/a/AGonzales1_2.htmhttp://www.aclu.org/
  • 8/14/2019 US Shoot Americans

    3/4

    The new provision is the latest chapter of the ongoing effort by death penalty proponents to speed up the period between a sentence of death and its execution, which in some states can take not years, butdecades. Under an earlier version of the law, new limits were established requiring a prisonersentenced to death under state law to seek review in federal courts within a year (now six months) of thetime he has exhausted his state appeals, and imposing time limits on how long federal district judgesand appellate courts could take to decide the cases. The catch was that the states had to establish thatthey were providing adequate assistance of counsel in state courts, which they have failed to do,

    according to the federal courts charged to review these claims.

    What the new law does is take that decision-making authority away from the federal courts and invest itin the attorney general."

    Though lost upon the American people themselves, the terrifying new law they are now living under,

    called The Patriot Act, and which allows to their War Leaders, including Attorney General Gonzales, to

    rule by dictate alone, is based upon the Nazi Germans law that brought Adolph Hitler to power:

    "The Enabling Act was a special power allowed by the Weimar Constitution to give the Chancellor[Hitler] the power to pass laws by decree without the involvement of the Reichstag. These special

    powers would remain in effect forfour years, after which time they were eligible to be renewed."

    It is interesting to note that the like the Nazi German Enabling Act, the United States Patriot Act was,

    likewise, due for expiration after 4 years after being signed into law by President Bush on October 26,

    2001 after the attacks on America on September 11, 2001:

    "Many of the act's provisions were to sunset beginning December 31, 2005, approximately 4 years afterits passage."

    To the greatest understanding of the vast similarities between the present United States and last centuries

    Nazi Empire, one look no further than the history of the Bush Family itself, and as we can read as

    reported by Britains Guardian News Service in their article since banned in the United States:

    "George Bush's grandfather, the late US senator Prescott Bush, was a director and shareholder ofcompanies that profited from their involvement with the financial backers of Nazi Germany.

    The Guardian has obtained confirmation from newly discovered files in the US National Archives that afirm of which Prescott Bush was a director was involved with the financial architects of Nazism.

    His business dealings, which continued until his company's assets were seized in 1942 under theTrading with the Enemy Act, has led more than 60 years later to a civil action for damages beingbrought in Germany against the Bush family by two former slave labourers at Auschwitz and to a hum of

    pre-election controversy.

    Rumours of a link between the US first family and the Nazi war machine have circulated for decades.Now the Guardian can reveal how repercussions of events that culminated in action under the Tradingwith the Enemy Act are still being felt by today's president

    George Bush's grandfather, the late US senator Prescott Bush, was a director and shareholder ofcompanies that profited from their involvement with the financial backers of Nazi Germany.

    http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USA_PATRIOT_Acthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enabling_acthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enabling_acthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enabling_acthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enabling_acthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enabling_acthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USA_PATRIOT_Acthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USA_PATRIOT_Acthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USA_PATRIOT_Acthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USA_PATRIOT_Acthttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USA_PATRIOT_Acthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USA_PATRIOT_Acthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enabling_acthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enabling_acthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enabling_acthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USA_PATRIOT_Acthttp://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05http://www.seacoastonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070819/OPINION/708190340/-1/OPINION05
  • 8/14/2019 US Shoot Americans

    4/4

    The Guardian has obtained confirmation from newly discovered files in the US National Archives that afirm of which Prescott Bush was a director was involved with the financial architects of Nazism.

    His business dealings, which continued until his company's assets were seized in 1942 under theTrading with the Enemy Act, has led more than 60 years later to a civil action for damages beingbrought in Germany against the Bush family by two former slave labourers at Auschwitz and to a hum ofpre-election controversy.

    The evidence has also prompted one former US Nazi war crimes prosecutor to argue that the latesenator's action should have been grounds for prosecution for giving aid and comfort to the enemy.

    The debate over Prescott Bush's behaviour has been bubbling under the surface for some time. Therehas been a steady internet chatter about the "Bush/Nazi" connection, much of it inaccurate and unfair.But the new documents, many of which were only declassified last year, show that even after Americahad entered the war and when there was already significant information about the Nazis' plans andpolicies, he worked for and profited from companies closely involved with the very German businessesthat financed Hitler's rise to power. It has also been suggested that the money he made from thesedealings helped to establish the Bush family fortune and set up its political dynasty.

    Remarkably, little of Bush's dealings with Germany has received public scrutiny, partly because of thesecret status of the documentation involving him. But now the multibillion dollar legal action fordamages by two Holocaust survivors against the Bush family, and the imminent publication of threebooks on the subject are threatening to make Prescott Bush's business history an uncomfortable issuefor his grandson, George W, as he seeks re-election."

    Three days ago President Putin ordered the resumption of Russian strategic nuclear bomber flights

    against the United States and its Allies.the American people should begin asking themselves why, and

    when finding the answer begin their immediate preparations for Total War.

    August 19, 2007 EU and US all rights reserved.

    [Ed. Note: The United States government actively seeks to find, and silence, any and all opinions about the United States

    except those coming from authorized government and/or affiliated sources, of which we are not one. No interviews are

    granted and very little personal information is given about our contributors, or their sources, to protect their safety.]

    Source: http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1029.htm

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/08/18/wputin118.xmlhttp://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1029.htmhttp://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1029.htmhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/08/18/wputin118.xmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.htmlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.html