Us food
1
February 10, 2011 Christopher Hunter, Managing Partner The MainSail Group 7427 Matthews Mint Hill Road #201 Mint Hill, NC 28227 Chris, As you know, today we performed a dynamometer evaluation at Rush International Truck Center, Charlotte, NC on behalf of US Food Service of Fort Mill, SC to determine whether our fuel saving device, Green- GoldGas, would increase the fuel mileage of US Food’s 2007 International 8600 (Serial #1HSHWAHN77J358120). On Wednesday, February 9, Rush’s technician connected the vehicle’s on-board computer system to his dy- namometer, recorded its findings and prepared for the test. He ran the engine long enough to get the engine, transmission and differential to typical operating temperatures, shut the engine off and recorded the results again. The test protocol involved securing (restraining) the vehicle sufficient to simulate a 50% or 40,000 pound load, running the engine up to a cruise-controlled speed of 65 miles per hour, cycling for a distance of precisely 25 miles and recording the results. The fuel consumption as recorded was 4.1 miles per gallon. The technician installed our device under the supervision of two US Food employees and together we se- cured the fuel tank caps and fuel filter to prevent tampering. The next morning, he repeated the protocol exactly as the day before and ran the prescribed 25 miles. At the end of the test he again recorded the results and noted a fuel consumption of 4.8 miles per gallon or a net increase of 17.1%. Best regards, Brian Adams Managing Partner NUTS NV, LLC
Transcript of Us food
February 10, 2011 Christopher Hunter, Managing Partner The MainSail Group 7427 Matthews Mint Hill Road #201 Mint Hill, NC 28227 Chris, As you know, today we performed a dynamometer evaluation at Rush International Truck Center, Charlotte, NC on behalf of US Food Service of Fort Mill, SC to determine whether our fuel saving device, Green-GoldGas, would increase the fuel mileage of US Food’s 2007 International 8600 (Serial #1HSHWAHN77J358120). On Wednesday, February 9, Rush’s technician connected the vehicle’s on-board computer system to his dy-namometer, recorded its findings and prepared for the test. He ran the engine long enough to get the engine, transmission and differential to typical operating temperatures, shut the engine off and recorded the results again. The test protocol involved securing (restraining) the vehicle sufficient to simulate a 50% or 40,000 pound load, running the engine up to a cruise-controlled speed of 65 miles per hour, cycling for a distance of precisely 25 miles and recording the results. The fuel consumption as recorded was 4.1 miles per gallon. The technician installed our device under the supervision of two US Food employees and together we se-cured the fuel tank caps and fuel filter to prevent tampering. The next morning, he repeated the protocol exactly as the day before and ran the prescribed 25 miles. At the end of the test he again recorded the results and noted a fuel consumption of 4.8 miles per gallon or a net increase of 17.1%. Best regards, Brian Adams Managing Partner NUTS NV, LLC
