US CMS Advisory BoardUS CMS Advisory Board

University of CaliforniaUniversity of CaliforniaAt RiversideAt Riverside

May 18-19, 2001May 18-19, 2001

Issues for this Meeting (Discussion) H. Newman Contributions from the IB Chairs CP Project Items D. Green SC Project Items L. Bauerdick CMS and US CMS Items D. Stickland Base Program: Action Committee V. Hagopian Election Committee: Result, Issues J. Hauser, J. Hanlon Next Meeting Site and Date H. Newman

Physics in the US J. Branson, D. Green Remote Control Room: Working Group Discussion of a Physics Analysis Center

AOB

Adjourn for Dinner by 19:15

US CMS Advisory BoardMay 18, 2001 17:30

Launching the Research Program M&O, Ongoing S&C, Residence-at-CERN Costs

Strengthening Physics Analysis Based in the US US-Based Centers: FNAL (Tier1), Tier2s

Requirements for Analysis Centers Critical Mass of Analysis and Support Staff at the Center Strong Support for CMS Physics Analysis at FNAL Remote Control Room We will need a WG; design, prototype, test

The US HEP Base Program Problem of University Group Budgets

Greater Funding for the DOE Office of Science and NSF EPP

Letters and Visit to Washington Quantifying Our Projects’ Base Program Manpower Annual Base Program Request to DOE

Snowmass Heavy Ions in CMS: Impact on US CMS

US CMS Issues for Discussion

US CMS Annual Base Program Requests from Projects

Framework: Project Oriented Requests Only; Need to Be Consistent with the Base Program Specifically identified as required to fulfill particular tasks

in the WBS, according to a known schedule Usually handled within the general funding envelope

determined through the normal annual review process Travel: treated as a Special Item;

(Also Software and Computing, until now) Prioritization of Requests: By L1 PMs, in consultation

with L2 PMs and Institutional Boards L2 Managers and IB Chairs conduct IB discussions

of project-related needs Each group needs to consider, prioritize what they request

Software and Computing Project Base Program Requests: Coordinated with the Construction Project Starting this Fall.

US CMS Collaboration MeetingUS CMS Collaboration Meeting

University of CaliforniaUniversity of CaliforniaAt RiversideAt Riverside

May 18-19, 2001May 18-19, 2001

1:00 Introduction Harvey Newman 1:10 Welcome to UC Riverside Chancellor Ray

Orbach 1:20 Meeting Logistics; UCR Group Activities Robert Clare 1:35 Physics Analysis in the US James Branson 1:55 Report from the US SC User Facility Mgr Vivian O’Dell 2:15 Report from the US SC Core Software Mgr Ian Fisk 2:35 JetMet PRS Group Report Shuichi Kunori 3:05 COFFEE 3:25 Muon PRS Group Report Darin Acosta 3:55 E/Gamma PRS Group Report Jim Branson 4:15 Remote Control Room and Analysis Dan Green

Center In the US 4:35 Discussion All 5:15 ADJOURN

5:30 - 7:30 PM Advisory Board Meeting at Science Library (Bldg 60)

US CMS Collaboration MeetingAgenda Friday May 18

8:30 Report to the US CMS Collaboration Harvey Newman 8:50 The Status of CMS Michel Della Negra

[*] 9:10 US CMS Construction Project Report Dan Green 10:00 US CMS Software and Computing Project Lothar Bauerdick

Report 10:30 CMS Core Software and Computing David Stickland 10:50 US Advisory Software and Computing Board Irwin Gaines 11:05 COFFEE 11:20 CMS Physics and L1 Trigger; TriDAS Progress Wesley Smith 11:50 Grids for US CMS and CMS Paul Avery 12:05 Election Committee Report: IB Chairs, ASCB Jim Hanlon

Jay Hauser 12:20 LUNCH

[*] By Video

US CMS Collaboration MeetingAgenda Saturday May 19

1:20 Heavy Ions In CMS Bolek WyslouchPablo Yepes

2:00 Education and Outreach Dan Karmgard 2:15 HCAL Report Andris Skuja 2:30 EMU Report John Layter 2:45 ECAL Report Renyuan Zhu 3:00 SiTrk Report Tim Bolton 3:15 FPIX Report Dick Lander

3:30 COFFEE 3:55 Physics Reconstruction and Selection Report Jim Branson 4:15 Discussion of Issues Vasken Hagopian 5:10 Next Meeting; AOB Harvey Newman 5:30 ADJOURN

US CMS Collaboration MeetingAgenda Saturday May 19

Report to US CMSReport to US CMS

Harvey B Newman, CaltechHarvey B Newman, CaltechUS CMS Collaboration MeetingUS CMS Collaboration Meeting

May 18-19, 2001May 18-19, 2001

PROGRESS at POINT 5PROGRESS at POINT 5

This image shows a portion of the central barrel ring of the CMS Return Yoke, on the right. The ring is ~15m diameter and weighs around 1800 tonnes. It will support the magnet systemand all of the barrel detectors.

YB-2, YB-1, YB0 Ready; YB1 Started. YE-1 Assembly Startedat CERN Last Week.

The CMS Collaboration

Oct, 17th, 2000/smhttp://cmsdoc.cern.ch/pictures/cmsorg/overview.html

Slovak Republic

CERN

France

Italy

UK

Switzerland

USA

Austria

Finland

Greece

Hungary

Belgium

Poland

PortugalSpain

Pakistan

Georgia

Armenia

UkraineUzbekistan

Cyprus

Croatia

China

TurkeyBelarus

Estonia

India

Germany

Korea

Russia

Bulgaria

1010

448

351

1809

Member States

Non-Member States

Total

USA

58

36

144

Member States

Total

USA

50Non-Member States

Number ofScientists

Number of Laboratories

China (Taiwan)

1809 Physicists and Engineers 31 Countries 144 Institutions

Associated Institutes

Number of ScientistsNumber of Laboratories

365

USA

US CMS is Progressing: 387 Members; 38 US CMS is Progressing: 387 Members; 38

US InstitutionsUS Institutions

FIT

CMS: A View to PhysicsLHC Schedule V31

CMS Working Detector Done By 1 Nov. 2005

Ring Closed and Cold End 2005

LHC One-Beam Commissioning Feb. - Mar. 2006

LHC 1 Month Pilot Run April 2006

Pre-Physics Shutdown May - July 2006

Physics Run: Lumi ~2 X 1033; August 2006 -

~10 fb-1 Accumulated February 2007

Lead Ion Run (Six Weeks) Mar. - April 2007

P.Lecoq

SUSY: Discovery and Study

Higgs event into two Photons

US CMS 2000-2001Getting Down to Business

Construction Project: On Schedule and On BudgetHCAL and EMU In Mass Production

Successful Lehman Review Last Week: Dan Green, PO and L2

Common Projects Essentially Done ECAL, EMU and HCAL > 50% Complete;

TriDAS and FPIX ~ 25% Complete CSC Assembly Experience Favorable

~ 35 of 148 CSCs Produced; On Schedule HCAL: HB- Absorber Done; Install Ahead of Sched.

Scint. Planes at CERN From May 24;12 of 18 HB+ Wedges Ready; HB Optics 80% Complete

Fermilab CSC factory

Gluing Station Anode bars, gap bars are glued to panels

Winding Station Wires are wound directly on panels

Soldering Station Automated soldering of wires

Wire Tension/Spacing Station Tension and spacing of wires are checked

Ionized Air Knife Station Dust is removed from wires and panels

Assembly Station Panels are stacked to make 6 gap chambers

US CMS 2000-2001Getting Down to Business

ECAL: Progress on APD Radiation Hardness;First Monitor Laser System to CERN this SummerDouble EB, EE Crystal Boules in Russia;

Crystals to Spec. in China FPIX: Now moving from R&D to prototyping

14 micron resol’n confirmed in testbeam SiDet: Important US Involvement in Production

(J. Incandela)New US Groups: Kansas, Kansas State, UCSB

P.Lecoq

62mm diameter PWO ingots from Bogoroditsk

CMS TriDAS Trigger TDR: A CMS Level 1 Milestone

(With Thanks to Wesley Smith) Submitted to LHCC 11/28/2000:

CERN/LHCC 2000-38; CMS TDR 6.1

Approved in March 2001 http://cmsdoc.cern.ch/cms/

TDR/TRIGGER-public/trigger.html Level 1 Trigger: Successful Calorimeter

and Muon Prototype Tests E.g. Sector Processor 6 Crates 1

DAQ Technology is Moving Fast and In The Right Direction Single-step EVB now the baseline

High Level Triggers: PRS Project Led by Paris Sphicas. US active in all 4 Groups Full Level 2 Results by July; Now on Lvl 3

CMS Management Board and Steering Committee

CPT

CPT Project

CMS CPT: Actually Three Projects, closely coupledComputing and Core Software D. Stickland Physics Reconstruction and Selection P. SphicasTriDAS(Online Farm and Software) W. Smith;

P. Sphicas CPT deliverables document: L. Taylor

(http://cmsdoc.cern.ch/cms/cpt/april01_rrb)Task Breakdown, Deliverables, Cross-projects

Project plan allows clean management of these three different types of task

Cross Project Joint Technical Board (JTB) Cross Project Task Forces

“CAFÉ” Soft. Arch. & Framework J. Branson

Focus on Trigger, Reconstuction + Analysis

Muons in the Barrel/Forward Transition

Low ET Events: Corrections

Electron Bremss. + Conversion Reconstruction

Energy Flow Parallel to the Beam

Use of Tracks is “on the Critical Path

Full Reconstruction

1216

29

4043 44 46

42

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

So

ftw

are

Pro

fessio

nals

(FT

E's

)

Offline only:Oct 1999 plan(Hoffmann)

25 27 31 33 33 33 33 33

Offline + Online(Hoffmann + Onlinetasks)

26 28.5 34.9 38.9 40.8 42 42.9 39.6

Offline + OnlineCore-SW(March 2001planning)

12 16 29 40 43 44 46 42

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Software Professional Manpower ( MoUs)

1 year delay of LHC

Online Core-SW added

Reassess-ment of Core-SW roles & planning

US and Worldwide Data Grid for CMS

Tier2 Center

Online System

Offline Farm,CERN Computer

Center

US Center @ FNAL

France Center

Italy Center UK Center

InstituteInstituteInstituteInstitute

Workstations

~100 MBytes/sec

~2.4 Gbits/sec

100 - 1000

Mbits/sec

Bunch crossing per 25 nsecs.100 triggers per secondEvent is ~1 MByte in size

Physicists work on analysis “channels”.

Each institute has ~10 physicists working on one or more channels

Physics data cache

~PBytes/sec

~0.6 - 2.5 Gbits/sec + Air Freight

Tier2 CenterTier2 CenterTier2 Center

~622 Mbits/sec

Tier 0 +1

Tier 1

Tier 3

Tier 4

Tier2 Center Tier 2

Experiment

US CMS Software and Computing Project

GOALS: To provide the software and computing

resources needed to enable US physicists to fully

participate in the physics program of CMS

Allow US physicists to play key roles and exert

an appropriate level of leadership in all stages

of computing related activities

From their home institutions

LEADERSHIP: L1 PM Lothar

Bauerdick

User Facility L2 PM Vivian O’Dell

Core Applications Software L2 PM Ian Fisk

US-CMS S&C Project: Steps to First-Round “Baseline”

Aug 1998 First presentation to DOE/NSF (Newman + Taylor) 12/98 - 6/00 Project Management Plan (PMP) 11/98, 5/99 Favorable DOE/NSF “Peer” Reviews;

Funding for Software Engineers 7/99 - Acting Software and Computing Board; L1/L2 PMs 12/99 Submission of Draft PMP to DOE/NSF 1/00 WBS, Draft Funding Profile for 2000-2006

Presented at DOE/NSF Peer Review 3/00 Start Up Funding for UF Subproject 5/17/00 First GriPhyN ITR Proposal (Grid IT R&D) 5/20/00 SC Organization Approved and PMP by US CMS

CB 6/5/00 US CMS Constitution Amendments Competed 5/30/00 DOE/NSF Proposed Funding Profile 6/25/00 Updated PMP sent to collaboration 6/00 - 11/00 Update Requirements and Costs 7/00 - 1/01 First Tier2 Center Prototype Startup 10/00 FNAL Oversight Panel Reviews Start 11/14/00 Project Baselining Review by DOE/NSF 11/18/00 L1 PM Starts; Appoints L2 PMs (CAS, UF)

US CMS Elective Offices

CB Chair and Deputy: Term Through Mid-2002 Advisory Board: Up for Election; Term To Mid-2003

Darin Acosta U Florida TRIDASTom Ferguson CMU EMUVasken Hagopian FSU HCALDick Lander UC Davis FPIXRenyuan Zhu Caltech ECALRandy Ruchti Notre Dame EO CoordinatorJim Branson UCSD Physics

Coordinator Election Committee: Through Early Spring 2002

Jim HanlonJay Hauser

Report by the Election Committee Today

US CMS ASCB Transition from the Acting SC Board in Fall 2000 Provide Input and Feedback to the US S&C Project

on US CMS needs, within the project scope Well-versed in Software and Computing:

for Physics, and Technical Aspects Physics Coordinator Also a Member CP PM; US & Int’l SW PM’s, CD Head and CB Chair Ex-Officio Two Year Terms; Starting in Alternate Years

Irwin Gaines (Chair) FNAL Paul Avery Florida Sarah Eno Maryland Shuichi Kunori Maryland Sridhara Dasu Wisconsin David Stickland Princeton Jim Branson, Physics Coordinator UC San Diego

US CMS Remote Control Room

US CMS is using the CDF/KEK remote control room for Run II as a starting point. However, we want to expand the scope to encompass a US based physics group and US LHC accelerator tasks

-- Dan Green

A Working Example: SPARC

SPARC Real Time Data

US CMS Annual Base Program Requests from Projects

Framework: Project Oriented Requests Only

Specifically identified as required to fulfill particular tasks in the WBS, according to a known schedule Usually handled within the general funding envelope

determined through the normal annual review process Travel: treated as a Special Item;

(Also Software and Computing, until now) Prioritization of Requests: By L1 PMs, in consultation

with L2 PMs and Institutional Boards L2 Managers and IB Chairs conduct IB discussions

of project-related needs Each group needs to consider carefully what they request

Software and Computing Project Base Program Requests: Coordinated with the Construction Project Starting this Fall.

Launching the Research Program M&O, Ongoing S&C, Residence-at-CERN Costs

Strengthening Physics Analysis Based in the US US-Based Centers: FNAL (Tier1), Tier2s

Requirements for Analysis Centers Critical Mass of Analysis and Support Staff at the Center Strong Support for CMS Physics Analysis at FNAL Remote Control Room We will need a WG; design, prototype, test

The US HEP Base Program Problem of University Group Budgets

Greater Funding for the DOE Office of Science and NSF EPP

Letters and Visit to Washington Quantifying Our Projects’ Base Program Manpower Annual Base Program Request to DOE

Snowmass Heavy Ions in CMS: Impact on US CMS

US CMS Issues for Discussion

US CMS Collaboration Next Meetings

Next Collaboration Board Meeting December 2001 at Fermilab

Annual Collaboration Meeting 2002: Proposed for the End of May Candidate Host Institutions:

Propose by or at December 2000 CB Try to Coordinate with a Major

Subdetector Meeting This Year We Are Coordinated with “Physics” Positive Experience with 1.5 Day Schedule