URIE LAKE i GRID PL-l SURVEY MAPS APPENDIX A i TO...1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 w DRAWING...

lii ii i

i

ifi i liii

i

52K16NEe0M S .6235 CURIE LAKE 010

APPENDIX A

GRID PL-l SURVEY MAPS

TO

ACCOMPANY

A REPORT ON THE 1984 WINTER GEOPHYSICAL PROGRAM

PAPAONGA LAKE PROPERTY

l UCHI PROJECT

UCHI SUBPROVINCE

NORTHWESTERN ONTARIO

PARTOFN.T.S. 52K/16

Getty Canadian Metals, Limited Prepared by: April 198** D.B. Graham, B.Sc.

I Editor: 3.E. Hanneson 28 February 1985

S""'*'

l

l

l l

TABLE OF CONI SSKISNEMM s.eaas CURIE LAKE 010C

Page No.

l l l l l l l l l l l l

LIST OF FIGURES ii

LIST OF MAPS iii

1. INTRODUCTION l

2. LOCATION AND ACCESS l

3. LAND 2

4. PREVIOUS WORK 24.1 El Sol Gold Mines 34.2 Continental Mines Ltd. 34.3 Getty Mines, Limited 3

5. INSTRUMENTATION AND PROCEDURE 45.1 MaxMin II EM Survey 45.2 Proton Magnetometer Survey 4

6. GRID P.L.-1 56.1 1983 Ground Work 56.2 1984 Results and Recommendations 6

7. GRID P.L.-2 87.1 1983 Ground Work 87.2 Discussion of Results 9

7.2.1 Conductor 2a 97.2.2 Conductor 2b 107.2.3 Conductor 2c 107.2.4 Conductor 2d 117.2.5 Conductor 2e 117.2.6 Conductor 2f 117.2.7 Conductor 2g 127.2.8 Conductor 2h 13

7.3 Recommendations 13

8. SUMMARY 1 3

REFERENCES

APPENDIX A Grid P.L.-1 Survey Maps

APPENDIX B Grid P.L.-2 Survey Maps

l l l l

-11-

LIST OF FIGURES

FIG. No. TITLE AFTER PAGE

: l la. Location Map - Uchi Volcanic Belt Project l

ib. Trench Locations and HLEM Responses l

l 2a. Uchi Volcanic Belt; Claim Block Outlinesand Regional Geology 2

|| 2b. Papaonga Lake Property Map 2

3. Previous Work, Papaonga Property Area 3

"' *. Area of 1983 Uchi Program 5

l 5. Compilation of Selected Data; Grid P.L.-l 5

6. Compilation of Selected Data; Grid P.L.-2 8

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

11i111111111111111

w

DRAWING LOCATION NUMBER

Appendix A PL1-1

" PL1-2

11 PL 1-3

PLM

Appendix B PL2-1E

11 PL2-1W

11 ^ PL2-2

" PL2-3

" PL2-4

11 PL2-5

Appendix C 3

-111-

LIST OF MAPS

TITLE SCALE

Magnetometer Survey Grid PL-1 1:2500

HLEM Survey Grid PL-1 (1777 Hz) 1:2500

HLEM Survey Grid PL-1 (HW Hz) 1:2500

HLEM Detail Survey Grid PL-1 1:2500

Magnetometer Survey Grid PL-2 (East) 1:2500

Magnetometer Survey Grid PL-2 (West) 1:2500

HLEM Survey Grid PL-2 (1777 Hz) 1:2500

HLEM Survey Grid PL-2 (M H Hz) 1:2500

HLEM Detail Survey Grid PL-2(L9E, Five Frequencies) 1:2500

HLEM Detail Survey Grid PL-2(L8E, L9E, Five Frequencies) . 1:2500

Claims and Grid Areas 1:10000

l -l-

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

1. INTRODUCTION

The Papaonga Lake area was initially selected by Getty Canadian Metals,

Limited as having good potential for economical concentrations of gold

mineralization. Favourable geological and structural environments in

conjunction with a little known Asp-Au showing persuaded Getty to initiate a

major exploration program in the area. The 1983 program consisting of a

regional helicopter borne E.M., V.L.F.-E.M. and magnetometer survey, multi element lake sediment sampling program, lithogeochemical survey, geological

mapping as well as Landsat lineament studies defined a number of favourable

areas which required further work.

In the Papaonga Lake area the Dighem airborne survey defined a number of high

priority conductors which required ground follow-up work. Consequently, a

winter geophysical program consisting of Max-Min II E.M. and magnetometer

surveys was carried out over two grids. A total of 99 kilometres of cut line

were established with 81 kilometres of line subsequently being surveyed. The

MaxMin II survey was carried out by Geocanex Ltd. of Toronto and Quebec.

The grid established on the south shore of Papaonga Lake is known as grid P.L.-

1 while the grid located north of Papaonga Lake is known as grid P.L.-2. The

magnetometer surveys were conducted by contract geological personnel under

the supervision of F.W. Nielsen.

2. LOCATION AND ACCESS

Grids P.L.-l and P.L.-2 are located approximately 110 km east southeast of Red

Lake in the district of Kenora, Northwestern Ontario (See Figure la, Ib). They

may be located on the Avis Lake Claim map which is part of N.T.S. map sheet

52-K-16. Access is by float or ski-equipped fixed wing aircraft from Red Lake,

Ontario. A forestry access road originating near Ear Falls will be extended east

to pass approximately 2 km south of Papaonga Lake within the next few years.

A power line extending from Ear Falls to Pickle Lake passes 27 km north of

Papaonga Lake.

-••;.::f! -

FAVOURABLE LAKE VOLCANIC BELT

4 UCHI LAKE VOLCANIC BELT -to

~' \Coropbeii a ^.. ^/^v.v/'V.v^l ter, Vo^nt^(Ao,^J?..^^V;^^V.^^.^^^^^, A9) ^•^^••^V-^V.^jr^.^^.^ ~^^^ rT.V.--A-.^.V.".-^ *'i

,^^^^fe^^^" ^rJ X*^-———V^

'* *8JV®*^..^ ..^^^^ \PAPAONGA LAKE

AREA

P LEGEND

•1 ^'-S? Volconic Complex .

p 'X' Airport Scale li AM ^ 1 6 0 40kmB ——— All weolher rood i , t

j ---- Proposed roodH 3 Major producers '(historic) JP Figure 1 o-

PAPAONGA PROPERTY

LOCATION MAPUCHI VOLCANIC BELT PROJECT

NORTHWESTERN ONTARIO "

X^f^jjj

DHAWKB* T.W.G. DATt FEB./85CHICKT1BY J. G. B. DRAWCNOKt.i 52 6 55 KAU l' 1,584,000

Getty Canadian Metals, Ltd.

~"*~~" *'~*"~i

II

*tl

CURIE

LAKE

. oossanH* *V^M

N Gri^ Area

LOCATIONS BHLEM RESPONDERS

SCALE 1?5 0,0 O ON.T.S.-.52 K/16TRENCH

TRENCHGetty Canadian Metals, Lt

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

-2-

3. LAND

The claims included (in whole or part) in grids P.L.-l and P.L.-2 are listed

below.

Grid P.L.-l

621690-621692 inclusive 621686-621687 inclusive 621680- 621684 inclusive 775222 - 775223 inclusive 775228 - 775229 inclusive

Grid P.L.-2

621589-621602 inclusive 621604 -621607 inclusive 621609-621611 inclusive 621613-621615 inclusive 621617-621619 inclusive 621622-621623 inclusive 621626-621630 inclusive 621701, 621758 775224 - 775225 inclusive 775230-775231 inclusive 775233, 775235 775237, 775240 775248775859 - 775862 inclusive 775864 - 775865 inclusive

The claims represent only part of the 233 claim Papaonga Lake property shown on

Figures 2a and 2b. Map 3 provides a more detailed presentation of the claim

locations as determined by field inspection and the location of grids PL-1 and PL-2.

More details about the staking dates and other information are to be provided in a

separate report on 1984 geological investigations.

4. PREVIOUS WORK

In 1956 an aeromagnetic survey was flown in the Papaonga Lake area by private

industry. Follow-up ground work in selected areas was carried out by various

companies in 1957. A federal aeromagnetic survey was flown over the region in

1960.

x

X

r V

T,

KRL KRL KRL r,KRL KRL

•52*1?'

KRL * KRL I KRL I l

KRL j KRL j. KRL l KRL~~!

Y

-l KRL l KRL l KRL~ | KRL~

I l ' l' [621755 '62I6OI i62l6O5 1621609

——— -L.—- -t — — — -}. — --.l KRL. r KRL t KRL , KRL

1J621756 I62I602J62I606 ,62I61O

1 KRL j KRL i KRL J KRL

l ,^ *'^SH i i|62sV757 l)62I6O3 l1 ; (~* I 62I6O7 I62I6II

HCRL 'KRL l KRL 'KRLh - i i r - l

KRL crKRL i;- KRL KRL

r6ZI6I3 6216.7 62.62. 621625 62 1628*621390 62 IS9V* 621598

KRL~ KRL f~KRTTKR . KRL | KRL

KRL KRL KRL KRL KRL

KRL.

KRL

KRL

KRL

KRL

1621599 l

621615^162.6.9 ' 62I623\J 621627 .62 1630*621592 1621596 | 621 6O 0^)775862 J775866 - - f - '-i ;. ' O l

."A

7-KRL KRL i .KRL

l T75295 [775287 1775279 1775272 (775264 J775Z5^775248 J77524O 621589

KRL lKRL JKRL

.77529.4 i 775286 ' 775278 . 775271— -XJ — ' L- _ 4- — —KRL . IKR^IK— -IKRL IKRLKRL

l 775293 .775285

KRL l KRL

j 775277

-L

~nt/ 1 77ypz6̂ '

775292 1775284 xf 775276 x-V^_ _ J_ 7 __ 'O^ c?KRL - l KRL j l KRL l KRLi 71 i

(775291 i7732B3 j 775275 l 775268

I~KRL l KRL/ l KRL 'KRL -f

/,0-co. ty, 75253 773Z45J . .

KRL KRL 'KRL ——

'77529O

KRL KRL^/.775282 1775274 #775267/ ' -L

-^C—L —— ——' ^-| ————— l~rST T- •'KRL j KRL j KRL

775289 1.775281 1775273 , i^J y-^ A 7 75Z5O ' 77SZ4Papaonga

"J621698

Is 21695162169^

1775266^,,;

775265

KRL

KRL KRL . l I KRL

r&zmr

KRL ^L KRC-

52172O

KRL

321689 39780

'ilCR.L.:

ty\C-RJ. 39768

V39769 '

KRL fKRC TKRL KRL

6Z1S93

-KRL

.621597,

CRL

^Jr775227 j

.KRL"-

{77525*

[ 1d*L ]KRt

~l t

K R L-r

L, KRL,

KRL KRL.

^l^-^l T' " --r--" ' I." ' 117732311-^8591775863^ 26|7TSZ3St"K36|773Z3*|TT3Z3Z|773ZZS7^^^OS , |

~ ————— f —— ————————— —— —— —— —— .- ——————

KRL ' KRL l 77523Z *'— : - -l.---; '~

Z6Oi

KRL

7TS239 '775

KRL, l KRL.

JT75Z43J"

PT5257J

- L..

.T7524K

. l .."^KRLJ. KRL~~7- KRL i. KRL.621633

KRL KRL. ' KRL KRL - KRL

**\ f ' l -'S2IS59 6ZI66Z t 621665 | 621668,

KRL KRL KRL l ̂ KRL KRL- { KRL , J KRL. J Kl ~ KRT ~ KRL f

. i :i i .l 621639 621642 6216451621648 62I6S "M554 '621571

fat ' trot ~T~ rtr:—f~ rr~—l— ——-i— — —i

KRL

KRL KRL l KRL KRL— —11*,^ ___]f ' '*' /T^^^"^ KRL Vi KRL j KRL \[9f X

j62(6J6 (621639 ' 621642 } 6216451 62 1648 621651 621654 621G/-571 6ZI66OI 621663 . 621666 j 621669 Js2l672| 621673 '

KRL I KRL * KRL l KRL l KRL ' itRt.-' KRt. TltRIl l IcSl ZZLtefLZZ-^. ~n-^m*\-j^—^^-^L^^TT^~~ ~'

' 621664)621667|

KRLl

6Z.^37JJS2^64p^l^621643jj621646^[ 62.649J^2^652J62^655^62I6^5.8J6^66I^ [621664; 62.667 | 6^21 67Oj^62t673|6^2^67g

j 621752621742 621735 62732 521725 62122 -- . . .

62,745 l | V- \ l J62I691 1621686 J62 .684 | 6 2I6S3 I62I6\82 .621681— — —— ! — — — — — — -' — — — — — — ' — —— —— r — — — |— — —— . _ __ _ " __ __ l / \'— — l — — —— — — — — — — - — — — — — — — —— —— r

KRL l KRL l KRL j IcRL j KRL l KRL l KRL \

li' l l ' l' * 7 *62.679

KRL

l 2!!5!KRL l KRL . K RL l KRU

li2!!4 . -- ———-

5YME.OU5

B l

j _ ___ KjCRlT l

F'EE't"

l OOO 2OOO 6OOO 8000

l— __ l

O 200 METRES

1OOO' 1 KM)

200O (2 KM)

ht.U ty otkers

Figure Z b

PAPAONGA LAKE PROPERTYUCHI VOLCANIC SELT, V.w. Q N T AKI O

PROPERTY MAP

PRAWNBT: T-6-6- l QME Feb./05CH6CK-QBY: J-&- a -

52 K Ife l SOLE l: 31. Up


ll

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

-3-

4-1 El Sol Gold Mines

In the Curie Lake area in 1957 two east-west baselines were cut with crosslines spaced 400 feet apart (see Fig. 3). A ground magnetometer survey was conducted by Geo-Technical Development Co. Ltd. in May of 1957. Subsequently two diamond drill holes were drilled on the property (see Fig. 3). The drilling encountered widths of up to 99.0 ft. of talc schist as well as widths of up to 25.0 feet of banded magnetite. Mineralization of interest included minor pyrite, pyrrhotite and some very minor arsenopyrite and chalcopyrite.

4.2 Continental Mines Ltd.

In 1957 Continental Mines Ltd. cut an east-west baseline near the south shore of Papaonga Lake (see Fig. 3). A magnetometer survey was carried out and a regional iron formation was delineated. Ten diamond drill holes (see Fig. 3) intersected varying widths from 10 metres to 90 metres of banded magnetite.

No other work has been recorded in the area although the author is aware that various companies have held ground around Papaonga Lake. As recent as the late 1970's Cominco had staked 40 claims in the vicinity of Grid P.L. -1. They have since lapsed.

4.3 Getty Mines, Limited

In 1983 Getty Mines, Limited carried out reconnaissance and preliminary geological, geophysical and geochemical evaluation of the Papaonga Lake area. Claims were staked in 1983 and early 1984. Details are provided in reports by Graham et al (1983), Gregory et al (1983), Nielsen (1983) and Smith (1983). Appropriate details are incorporated in sections 6.1 and 7.1 of this report.

r; l

DDH#1

PAPAONGA, LAKE

Diamond Drill Holj

Continental .1957BL

PREVIOUS WORK

PAPAONGA PROPERTY AREA

DRAWN BY- D.G.CHECK'D BY:N.T.S.:52 K/16

DATE: April 1984DRAW'G No: 3 xSCALE; 1 *-5 0.0 O O


ll ll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

-4-

5. INSTRUMENTATION AND SURVEY PROCEDURES

5.1 Max-Min II Electromagnetic Survey

A Max-Min II horizontal loop electromagnetic survey was conducted over the two grids designated P.L.-l and P.L.-2. Readings were taken every 25 metres on two frequencies (1777 Hz and W* Hz) with a standard cable separation of 150 metres. Line spacing was 100 metres. All readings were made with l/P and 0/P conpensator dials locked at 5.00. All measurements were made with coplanar coils and topographic conditions noted. Phase mixing tests were performed at the start and end of each survey day to control any phase mixing problems as described by 3. Betz (Max-Min II Electromagnetic System, Operations Manual, 3uly, 1977, Apex Parametrix Ltd.).

5.2 Proton Magnetometer Survey

Between the dates of February 24, 1984 and March 10, 1984 a proton magnetometer survey was carried out by Getty contract personnel on grids P.L.-l and P.L.-2. In all, a total of 81 kilometres of readings were taken at 12.5 metre intervals on lines spaced 100 metres apart. Grid P.L.-l consisted of 26.4 km of line and P.L.-2 consisted of 54.45 km of line.

The field instrument used was a Geometrics Model G-816/826 portable proton magnetometer which, equipped with a sensor mounted on a six foot staff, takes total magnetic field measurements. A base station consisting of a modified Geometrics G-826A portable proton magnetometer coupled with a model MR-10 (produced by Canadian Mining Geophysics Ltd.) programmable microprocessor recorder-printer was utilized to correct for diurnal variation, instrument drift and to provide a common base for data throughout the surveys. Base station readings were recorded every 20 seconds. The base station was located at the Papaonga Lake camp to which an arbitrary data base of 60,330 nT was established to which all data was corrected. Field magnetometer readings were taken at the base

l

l

l l

Figure 4

LEGEND

Areo of 1983 Mopping, lithogeochemical ond oir- borne Geophysicol Survey

Areo of 1983 Loke Sediment Sompling

— — — 2nd Airborne Survey A reo

UCHI RECONNAISSANCE

COMPILATION MAP

DRAWN BY'CHECK'DBYNTS 52 NW NE

DATE QCT 63DRAWO NOSCALE r 500 ooo


lj:,r .(B

l

l

i

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

station at the beginning and end of each survey day and instrument discrepancies were noted and corrected. The accuracy of the survey is ^ lOnT.

6. GRID PL-1

6.1 1983 Ground Work

The multi-element lake sediment sampling program in 3une, 1983 was carried out with the intention of outlining favourable regions for base metals and gold exploration (area outlined on Fig. 4). The results of this program (as applied to this locale) showed among other things, anomalous geochemcia! values of arsenic in samples taken proximal to the Lake St. [Joseph Fault. This gives rise to the possibility of an associated gold- arsenic environment.

A Landsat lineament study was performed by Gregory Geoscience Limited of Ottawa in 1983. This regional study indicates the presence of a large scale east-west trending fault system which is locally interrupted by cross-cutting structural features in the vicinity of Papaonga Lake. Geological mapping and alteration patterns suggest an overprint provided by the Lake St. Joseph Fault.

Grid P.L.-l, illustrated in Figure 5, is found in sedimentary units of the English River subprovince. These sediments consist of greywackes, siltstones and volcanic derived sediments and tuffs. The regional strike is generally east-west and these units are well sheared in the vicinity of the Lake St. 3oseph Fault.

A regional iron formation has been mapped to the north of grid P.L.-l (approx. 300 metres north) and to the west of Papaonga Lake. Its east- west extent may be traced on federal aeromagnetic maps (1960) and the aeromagnetic plots by Dighem Ltd. ( for Getty Canadian Metals, Ltd., 1983). This is most probably the north limb of an anticlinal structure the south limb of which is outlined by the Getty magnetometer survey on Grid P.L.-l.

qtz -tour

s o o•f K

Oo o

LEGEND

Au - Asp showing

showing to be trenched (in progress) Figure 5Scole

Ol

100 200 300 400m

ophysical j conductor

O 100

Tit l.ln* 61 00 S

N•* t

PAPAONGA LAKE PROPERTY j

Compilation of Selected Data GRID PL-1

DRAWN BY; T.O,CHECK O BY; R. C. DFUWOJJo

scAii i TIo'ooo"


ll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

-5-

A Landsat lineament study was performed by Gregory Geoscience Limited of Ottawa in 1983. This regional study indicates the presence of a large scale east-west trending fault system which is locally interrupted by cross-cutting structural features in the vicinity of Papaonga Lake. Geological mapping and alteration patterns suggest an overprint provided by the Lake St. Ooseph Fault.

Grid P.L.-l, illustrated in Figure 5, is found in sedimentary units of the English River subprovince. These sediments consist of greywackes, siltstones and volcanic derived sediments and tuffs. The regional strike is generally east-west and these units are well sheared in the vicinity of the Lake St. 3oseph Fault.

A regional iron formation has been mapped to the north of grid P.L.-1 (approx. 300 metres north) and to the west of Papaonga Lake. Its east- west extent may be traced on federal aeromagnetic maps (I960) and the aeromagnetic plots by Dighem Ltd. ( for Getty Canadian Metals, Ltd., 1983). This is most probably the north limb of an anticlinal structure the south limb of which is outlined by the Getty magnetometer survey on Grid P.L.-1.

Mineralization of potential economic importance is found in the form of minor pyrite and arsenopyrite as well as rare pyrrhotite. The most common alteration products are ankerite and sericite which are most abundant where shearing is greatest.

A gold-arsenic showing is located on the south shore of Papaonga Lake (1+OOW, U75N) on Grid P.L.-l, see Figure 5. In 1983 trenching and sampling of the "Asp-Au" showing yielded values of up to 300 p.p.b. gold and 2.6896 arsenic. The Asp-Au showing is highly sheared and altered with abundant arsenopyrite, sericite and minor pyrite, pyrrhotite and tourmaline. The "Asp-Au" extension is associated with a contorted sedimentary formation and yielded values of up to 38 p.p.b. gold and 2200 p.p.b. arsenic.

l ll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l ll

-6-

Mineralization of potential economic importance is found in the form of minor pyrite and arsenopyrite as well as rare pyrrhotite. The most common alteration products are ankerite and sericite which are most abundant where shearing is greatest.

A gold-arsenic showing is located on the south shore of Papaonga Lake (UOOW, 1+75N) on Grid P.L.-l, see Figure 5. In 1983 trenching and sampling of the "Asp-Au" showing yielded values of up to 300 p.p.b. gold and 2.6896 arsenic. The Asp-Au showing is highly sheared and altered with abundant arsenopyrite, sericite and minor pyrite, pyrrhotite and tourmaline. The "Asp-Au" extension is associated with a contorted sedimentary formation and yielded values of up to 38 p.p.b. gold and 2200 p.p.b. arsenic.

The 1983 airborne geophysical survey (area outlined on Figure 4) performed by Dighem Ltd. for Getty Canadian Metals, Ltd. outlined a high priority A.E.M. response which is encompassed by grid P.L.-l (see Figure 5).

6.2 198*f Results and Recommendations

The airborne EM responder which was influential in the grid placement was detected by the HLEM survey in the location expected (see Map PL1- 1). It appears to be a simple zone which is continuous between (6+25E, 0+55N) and (11+25E, 1+10N) with a vertical or steep northward dip and conductances as high as 25 Siemens. It occurs in rocks mapped as metasediments but a feldspar porphyry is known to occur twenty or so metres north of its axis on line 9+25E. The conductor is also magnetic (see Map PL 1-1) and generates peak magnetic field intensities of about 1000 nT above background. The close correlation between magnetic and conductive anomalies suggest a large component of pyrrhotite but other sulphides of economic interest could also be present. Additional surveying with a 200 metre coil separation was conducted in an attempt to extend

li i i i i i i l i i i i i i i i i

-7-

the strike length in either direction but the results (see Map PLl-4) were negative.

The steep magnetic gradient found in the north-central portion of grid P.L.-l reflects the regional response of iron formation which runs east- west along the peninsula just north of Grid P.L.-l. It is probable that this magnetic signature reflects the south limb of an anticlinal structure centred further to the north.

Broad quadrature responses in the HLEM data occur on portions of the lines over Papaonga Lake and are undoubtedly due to conductive lake bottom sediments. There appear to be no HLEM responses at the arsenopyrite showing at (1+OOW, 1+75N) although a magnetic depression of 1000 nT was apparently detected twenty-five metres north of this location. While this might be interpreted as a spike caused by rocks exhibiting remanent magnetism, the one-reading anomaly - not detected on adjacent lines - is more likely a simple operator error and should be eliminated from the data set. The arsenopyrite at (1+OOW, 1+75N) suggests the presence of additional sulphides which could well occur in sufficient abundance to produce an induced polarization anomaly and an IP/resistivity survey is recommended over this line for the purpose of tracing any sulphide mineralization away from the surface showing. Difficult but not insurmountable operational problems are presented by the lake.

It is also recommended that a ground examination involving stripping, trenching and sampling of the conductor areas should be made where possible. Detailed mapping of the grid would be beneficial in enhancing any future drill targets. A soil sampling program of the A j horizon should be undertaken with samples being analyzed for gold and arsenic by neutron activation and copper and zinc by DCP. This may be instrumental in outlining any geochemically anomalous zones. Approximately 500 samples at 50 metre intervals on lines 100 metres apart is suggested.

[ll llJl l l l l l l l l l l l l l

-8-

Pending interpretation of the geophysical data and the above detailed work, a diamond drill program is recommended. Two to three hundred metres of drilling should adequately test the conductor, and any IP response that might be detected near (1+OOW, 1+75N).

7. GRID P.L.-2

7.1 1983 Ground Work

The results of the multi-element lake sediment sampling program in the vicinity of grid P.L.-2 revealed two slightly anomalous sites. A small lake five hundred metres east of the grid P.L.-2 base line at 24+OOE, returned sample values of 6 p.p.b. molybdenum, 110 p.p.b. zinc and 19 p.p.b. arsenic (see Fig. 6). These values are low in the range of anomalous values. A small lake, west-southwest of Curie Lake yielded values of 6 p.p.b. gold and 2 p.p.b. arsenic (approximate grid co-ordinates 8W, KfN). While these values are not highly anomalous they do suggest the possibility of a gold-arsenic associated environment.

The Landsat lineament study indicates the presence of two structural lineaments which pass through the central and northern portions of grid P.L.-2 (see Figure 6). These lineaments are parallel and approximately 600 metres apart, with a general strike direction of east south-east. Topographic highs are recorded in these vicinities especially in the central part of the grid. The iron formation is also present in this area (see Map PL2-2, conductor axis 2g) and has been noted in outcrop on surface by the geophysical operators.

The area of grid P.L.-2 is underlain by a sequence of mafic to felsic volcanic rocks, sediments and mafic to intermediate intrusives. These units generally strike southeast-northwest. To the southwest of the grid are mafic to intermediate intrusives of the Papaonga Lake Pluton. A band of sediments comprised of greywackes, siltstones and tuffaceous metasediment? are found immediately to the south of these intrusives.

30 oz Au/ton (chip sample)

Getty Claim Block Outline

Legend

Structural Lineament

PAPAONGA LAKE PROPERTY

Compilation of Selected Data GRID PL-1if N orth Asp -Au showing

Max - W in 1C Conductor Axis

Getty Canadian Metals, Ltd

i m

l

l

l

i

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

-9-

Bordering the north part of the grid area is an intermediate intrusive unit. Immediately south of this unit is another band of sediments which host dioritic stocks to the west. The main portion of the grid is underlain by volcanic rocks of mafic to felsic composition with a central sedimentary belt which runs the length of the grid area.

Mineralization of potential economic significance includes pyrite, arsenopyrite, oxide facies iron formation, minor pyrrhotite and rare chalcopyrite. A gossan zone just south of grid P.L.-2 west half (see Figure 1) is hosted by a chloritized mafic volcanic. Trench samples yielded values ranging up to 13 p.p.b. gold, 0.1496 copper and 34 p.p.b. arsenic.

In the central portion of the east part of P.L.-2 (see Fig. l # 6) is an arsenopyrite hosted gold showing known as the "North-Asp" showing. 1983 trench samples returned assay values up to 0.33 oz./ton gold and 1396 arsenic. The showing exhibits ubiquitous but variable amounts of disseminated arsenopyrite and abundant quartz stringers which comprise 15-2096 of the exposure. The zone is underlain by chloritized greywackes.

7.2 Discussion of Results

Conductors on grid P.L.-2 have been named on Map PL2-2 and their locations are consistent with responders detected by the airborne geophysical survey.

7.2.1 Conductor 2a

Conductor 2a has a strike length of at least 300 metres from 0+00, 10+OON to 2+OOE, 10+90 N. The dip of the conductor appears variable from steeply north on the west end to steeply south on the east extent.

A magnetic anomaly of up to 8900 nT is associated with the conductor axis. This magnetic trend extends 200 metres further

lll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

-10-

east than the electromagnetic response. A magnetic depression flanks the anomalous magnetic signature to the north and is truncated to the east by a peak of 3000 nT. This zone has an associated topographic high which may indicate possible silicification associated with the conductor. It appears that this conductor, while relatively strong on the west end, seems to weaken more gradually to the east as it dies out. This electromagnetic signature may indicate a plunge to the east.

7.2.2 Conductor 2b

This conductor spans at least nine lines from L 7+00 E, 9+75 N to L 15+OOE with the conductor running off the east end of the grid. The dip of this response is steeply south to vertical. The conductor appears strong on L 7+00 E and 8+00 E but weakens gradually to the east except for the L 15+00 E traverse which shows high conductance.

The anomalous magnetic trend associated with conductor 2b seems to correlate to the varying strength of the conductor. Between L 6+00 E and L 8+00 E a value of approximately 1000 nT above background is observed. This anomalous situation diminishes to the east until a noticeable increase in intensity is observed at lines 14+00 E and 15+00 E where it peaks at 3000 nT. A minor peak of 650 nT is noted on L 12+00 E.

7.2.3 Conductor 2c

Conductor 2c spans 12 lines. Open ended to the east of the grid, it appears to be incorporated into the regional iron formation at approximately L 13+00 E, 6+75 N. The conductor response in this area is complicated by the iron formation which was intersected by drilling done in 1957 by El Sol Gold Mines Ltd. The dip of the conductor is interpreted to be vertical to steeply north.

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

-11-

The magnetic anomaly associated with conductor 2c is persistent along strike and reaches a maximum of about 6000 nT on L 21+00 E.

7.2.4 Conductor 2d

This electromagnetic response runs from L 8+00 W to the southeast end of the grid where it appears to be dying out. The dip appears vertical to steeply north.

There is a distinct magnetic trend associated with the axis of conductor 2d. This trend is partially obscured by the magnetite iron, formation located two hundred metres to the north, which exhibits a broad gradient. Conductor 2d is probably comprised of a significant amount of pyrrhotite.

7.2.5 Conductor 2e

Conductor 2e is traced out between L 12+OOW, 3+75 S, and L 16+00 W, 4+25 S. The dip of the conductor is interpreted to be vertical to steeply north. The strongest portion of the conductor is accompanied by a magnetic anomaly between L 14+00 W and L 16+00 W. On L 16+00 W immediately north of the magnetic anomaly is a magnetic depression of -1589 nT. Another depression (408 nT) flanks the anomalous trend to the south, A peak of 2600 nT is recorded 100 metres south of the conductor axis on L 13+00 W. This conductor is directly associated with a topographic "high" which possibly may be related to silicification of the local rocks. Conductor 2e is probably the western extension of Conductor 2d with poor conductance values on lines 9W, 10W and HW.

7.2.6 Conductor 2f

The conductive response observed here is of a vertically dipping body which generally strikes east-west over four lines from L 18+00 W to L 22+00 W. Weak responses are noted one line to the east and west of this conductor.

ll l l lll l l

f;

l l l l l l l l l l

-12-

The conductor axis has a coincident magnetic anomaly of up to 3000 nT. On L 18+00 W there is a magnetic depression adjacent to the anomalous magnetic trend noted above. This depression magnetic signature continues west to L 19+00 W where the depression is Jess intense. This conductor is accompanied by a topographic high possibly indicating silicification accompanying the cause of the conductor.

7.2.7 Conductor 2g

This magnetic HLEM response is regional in extent having a strike length of some three kilometres from L 7+00 W, 0+12 N to L 22+00 E, 2+50 N. The unusual sharp positive peaks on the Max-Min II in- phase profiles are indicative of magnetite at a location midway between the peaks. This is confirmed by a coincident magnetic anomaly and the results of drilling done by El Sol Gold Mines Ltd. (1957). Detailed Max-Min II work over this conductor, utilizing shorter (50 metre) cable separation and multiple frequencies, has verified the character of the conductor. The dip of the formation is probably steep to vertical. This response seems to weaken at L 15+00 E, 4+75 N.

The positive in-phase peaks on the HLEM profiles is caused by the strong magnetic permeability of the zone; indeed the zone appears to have no significant conductivity contrast. The magnetic low immediately over the HLEM responder is believed to be an artifact of the proton precession measurement apparatus which is improperly tuned in the greatly strengthened magnetic field or simply incapable of accommodating the field gradients. The editor of this report believes that readings within about fifty metres of the HLEM responder axis are invalid and that these portions of the grid lines should be resurveyed with fluxgate equipment.

llll l

, m

l l l l l l l l l l l l l

-13-

7.2.8 Conductor 2h

The Dighem airborne EM conductor response in this instance was listed as a low priority surficial conductor. Open ended, west of L 2+00 W, 5+50 N this conductor has a coincident anomalous magnetic signature. The strike of the conductor appears more northerly than the others located on grid P.L.-2 and it terminates on L 1+00 W, 6+50 N. The strength of the response is weak to moderate.

7.3 Recommendations

It is recommended that, at the earliest opportunity, a ground examination of the conductor areas be undertaken. Stripping, trenching and sampling, where possible would further define the character of the conductors. A detailed mapping program of the grid will help to tie in the geology more accurately. A soil sampling program of the Aj humic horizon should be undertaken in order to geochemically define any zones of potential economic significance. This survey would involve sampling at 50 metre intervals over grid P.L.-2 which would involve the collection of roughly 1000 samples. These should be analyzed for gold and arsenic by neutron activation and copper and zinc by DCP.

Pending the results of the aforementioned detailed work and the fluxgate magnetometer results over Responder 2g, a diamond drill program is recommended. In all, ten holes for a total of 1000 metres should adequately test these responders.

8. SUMMARY

In the summer of 1983 a regional airborne geophysical survey was performed for Getty Canadian Metals, Limited, in the Uchi Lake - Fly Lake area of the Uchi subprovince, by Dighem Limited of Toronto. The Papaonga Lake property was flown as part of this regional geophysical coverage. The survey was carried out to determine the presence of possible bedrock conductors in the area. The Dighem III helicopter-borne survey delineated nine moderate to high priority

lij'11:*'

l

l

lyr lll l l l l l l

ll l l

electromagnetic responses underlying the Papaonga Lake property. As a result, two separate grids were established in the Papaonga Lake area in order to cover the outlined conductors. Grid P.L.-l is located on the south shore of Papaonga Lake while grid P.L.-2 is located approximately l kilometre north of Papaonga Lake (see Fig. 1).

Grid P.L.-l was established to cover the one airborne electromagnetic response as well as the Asp-Au showing and its extension located on the shore of Papaonga Lake. The Max-Min II survey confirmed the airborne E.M. response tracing out a conductor with a strike length of at least 500 metres. The magnetometer survey delineated an associated magnetic trend with the conductor but apparently not with the Asp-Au showing and its extension. An I.P./Resistivity test survey is recommended to determine if any response can be detected at the Asp-Au showing and if such a response would be traceable.

Grid P.L.-2 was established in order to define, on the ground, the remaining eight moderate to high priority E.M. responses and their magnetic associations. All of the eight airborne conductors were delineated on the ground with all conductors displaying anomalous magnetic trends. Another weak MaxMin II conductor with an associated magnetic anomaly was outlined and is believed to be related to a low priority airborne response. A regional iron formation striking northwest-southeast over 2.9 kilometres was recorded by both the magnetometer and MaxMin II surveys.

jll lll

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

REFERENCES

Graham, P., Van Den Beussche, B., Nielsen, F.W.

Preliminary Geology of the Papaonga Lake Claim Groups, N.T.S. 52-K-16, Internal Report, Getty Canadian Metals, Limited, 1983.

Gregory, A.F. and Moore, H.D.

Summary Report on the Faults and Linear Features of the Confederation - Birch Lakes Area, Northwestern Ontario prepared for Getty Canadian Metals, Limited, August 1983.

Nielsen, F.W.

Uchi Reconnaissance Program Summary Report of Reconnaissance Exploration Activity, Uchi Subprovince, Northwestern Ontario, 1983.

Smith, P.A.

Dighem III Survey of the Uchi Lake Area, Ontario for Getty Canadian Metals, Limited by Dighem Limited, Report No. 183, 1983.

KTPC C.") VTf,

fC8,. Geological.

land Expend.tures)SaK16NE8004 2.8335 CURIE LAKE

Minir 900

TALS ̂ LIMITED-—

jlownshipor Ar eapapaonga J^e

l Kenpra-Red Lake. Mining Dist^Prospector's Licence No.

__Tr890____.j___.

r.00, 150 York St. Toronto, Ontario M5H 3S5

.......of Author (of Geo-Technical report)

Daie of Survey (from ft t o) JTotal Miles of line Cut

l^^^^^ "/*na Ad "" /Graham (J, Hanneson. Ed) c/o GETTY CANADIAN METALS, LIMITED f address as above)

/edits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right

/Special Provisions

For first survey:Enter 10 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemicai

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

. - Other

Geological

Geochemical

^S^-Electrp/ra^WTic

f^. l' 'Ma^meter ^ ̂

JLQ+3

Days perClaim

|)/^./20

Days per Claim

——— ——

Days per — Oaim

^x^̂

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total ExpendituresTotal

Days Credits

InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits pci claim selected in columns at right.

Mining Claim uft.tP1'Prefix j NumbefflQS6

.KBL^

i . ,r':'^f.

• f' •••- -V•3. '.;V\:-

vi- i:;T'' -r;

- 1- v ~ .V *" " -

•.ir'-V:*!x" t*-"

- f - l)

;*"-t**-r"V^

' -^- ", \ . '-'"''''t-jH-'b i^M••^-*Vri •'•. '-y^.'•-v^-i w'i

-621589-±^ -62159.0.-^ -621591-^

6?1592 ^.^21*32.^

j

..621594^-

...621595.. ^

.621596..^ -62159jLj^ ^62159 8 J^:

621599 i/621600 (S

621601 0691604

-6.216Q5 O

^-621607-.r2- ^621609 . 12... -J621610..-I2... -621611 -t7L

Oi- J.D J. J l

v j- -1- o X 4 ' v

62161S f)

'Expend. Days Cr.

^0—. .-20— -20-r ^2Q^Z20- ^20^^Q—-20 .— ^20—

2020

-20 ̂ .

.-20— -20— -20— -20 — -.20--

20. .20

Mining ClaimPrefix 1 Numljerfkj^

-

^621617,^11 -.62l6iaj2^ -621619..^.

621622 -.

..621626..^ .621621..^ .621628^1^ -621629^6^ -621630....^'

C. O l C. Qf\ f .^0 D ^ J. D O \j l^^^

6.21681 ^

621683 L/

-621686- ^

.621692— —

E xpend. Dnys Cr,

-20^, -20— -20

^.20 _

s

*2Q

20

20s-2Ql—/S

^0 —

-20 — J2D— -20

Total number Of mining claims covered by this report of work.

Recorded Holder or Ageni (Signature

Certification Verifyina1 hereby certify that 1 have ^personal and intimMe or witnessed same durmg and/or after its complete

Narmp ancJ Postal Adofess of Person Certifying

J. G /Bryant c/o GETTY CANADIAN

knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report n and the annexed report is true.

METALS, LTD. St. 1200, 150Date Certified

June 14,

of Work annexed heretcyhnvinq pertormtdlhe worki^^/^ j fa* j i **CjP 9

York St. Toronto, Ontario M5H 3S!

1985 '^^^iy^^

Ref. Papaonga Lake Property NTS 52 K16Ministry o' Natural

Ontario

Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)

Mining Act

Instructions: - Please type or print.— If number of mining claims traversed

exceeds space on this form, attach a list. Note: — Only days credits calculated in the

"Expenditures" section may be entered in the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.

- Do not use shaded areas below.Type of Survey!*) Township or A reaPapQQncja Lake

Ground Magnetometer . ...^......... . ..........-. ——... Kenpra-Red L^e,14iiiijg Dist^Claim Holderd)

GETTY CANADIAN METALS, LIMITED

Prospector's Licenc

AddrettSuite 1200, 150 York St. Toronto, Ontario M5H 3S5

Survey Company

GETTY CANADIAN METALS, LTD.

Date of Survey (from 4 to) Total Miles of line Cut

Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report) claifliod

D. Graham (J. Hanneson. Ed) c/o GETTY CANADIAN METALS. LIMITED (address as above)Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions




Man DaysD f* r''' U t '

Complete t ewrVes'tde^ l V and enter total (s) here

A? ir} o !

MINING lAi^DS

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys,

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

"-Electromagnetic

^1 Q ̂ Magneto meter

- Radiometric

Geological

Geochemical

^f®3Electro^awTic

Ma^rneter ^ ̂

R/WmetrlS ^ ̂i— T ^^ \f* '

Days per Claim

l"**'

J 20

Days per Claim

Days per

3fe

\ ^

^

V--

1 *


Expenditures (excludes powerType of Work Performed

Performed on Claim(s)



Days Credits

S

InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim (elected in columns at right.

Mining ClaimPrefix

KRL

^••'. .;^T/*?^

ill••-W^.^V'il"'

/^^*iif

^^'^v^'^j

'"•' ' -i*\- .J: ?P*,

Number

621589

621590

621591621 5Q2621593621594

621595-J521596. .

621 5QR621599

621600621601

J521504621605621606

621607--.-- -621609-

621610

-521611 ̂ —— ^21613 . .-6216.14. .—.

621615

Expend. Days Cr.

-20— 20

20202020

-20— 20

202020

2020202020

.-20— -20— -20—

20JiO—

20

Mining ClaimPrefix

/. ...-! 'V

A-

Number

521617621618-621619

-621622-621623621626

.62l62a .

621629621630— - -.

..^21681 —— 621681

.621682 - .^621683 — -.

621684-621686-621687——-. 621690 -

/. 621691... ..-621692——

6217-01.6212581---

Expend. Days Cr.

-20— 20

202020

2020

2020

-20-20—

20.20—

20-20^

20

-20— -20.20 — .20 — 20

.20 _

Tore! number of mining clairVs covered by this 45 repo\t of work.

DateJune 14, 1985

Recorded Holder or Agen ^ (Signature^

7 *~i7Certification Verifying Repyyof Work

l hereby certify that l have {(personal and intimale knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed heretcyhaving perjgrrjj|dj or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

ie work

Name and Postal Addrets of Person Certifying

J.G O Bryant c/o GETTY CANADIAN METALS, LTD. St. 1200, 150 York St. Toronto, Ontario M5H 3SfDate CertifiedJune 14, 1985

Certified by (Signature,

1362 (61/9)

~'-lchemical and Expenditures)

...- LL . H '.L.' EM ' Sr Proton

METALS, LIMITED

Iouvnit" por A""'Papaonga Lake .a-Red—Lei.lrce

jProspector'i Licence No.

j T-890

)is

jmpeny

CANADIAN METALS, LIMlTEp (Mag.)ne and Address of Author (of Geo-Technicel report)

385......____, M M.__ _______^Date of Survey (from cV to) (Total Miles of line Cut

P 2 l WDay j Mo^ .J'.- 22.,2JUkjTLprev., ^lino! ainwn

. Graham (J. Hanneson, Ed,) c/o GETTY CANADIAN METALS, LIMITED (address a.s abpve)—————.Credits R equested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Proviiioni

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)



Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here

Airborne Credit*

Not*: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

. . Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

^Q——

4n

Day* per Claim

Days por Claim

Expenditures (excludes power s t r i pping)


Type Of Work Performed




Days Cred

S

InjtruciiontTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected In columns at right.

"Total nurnber of mining claims covered by this repon of work.

Date

June 14, 1985Recorded Holder or Apent

Certification Verifying ReDQ/Tof Work ft —-———.———t—*———i^.—————————^—,

•^^/gT^p^Qffice Use Only S~)

ate Approved as Recorded Branch Director

l hereby certify that l have e personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during snd/'or after its completion and the annexed report is true. "4*

Name end Postal Address o* Person Certifying

J.G. Bryant c/o GETTY CANADIAN^METALS, Lip. Ste. 1200, 150 York St. Toronto, Ont. M5H 3S5

1362 i 8i.Sn

Ontario

Natural R^^-ce

Report of Work{Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)

Mining Act

Ref. Papaonga Lake Property NTS 52Instructions: - Please type or print. Kip

— If number of mining claims traversed exceeds space on this form, attach a list.

Note: -Only days owlits calculated \ m t he

Dis.

— Do not use t haded areas below.Type of Survey(s) iTownship or '"" edPaDaOnGa LflksLinecutting,Max Min TT H.L.EM. k Proton Magnetometer Kenora-Red Lake Mining^Claim Holder(s)

GETTY CANADIAN METALS, LIMITEDAddress

Suite 1200, 150 York Street, Toronto, Ontario M5HSurvey Company GeOCaneX

GETTY CANADIAN METALS, LIMITED (Mac?.) (MMlT)Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)

D. Graham (J. Hanneson, Ed.) c/o GETTY CANADIAN ME

Prospector's Licence No.

T-890

3S5Date of Survey (from Si t o) {Total Miles of line Cut

unclaimed TALS. LIMITED (address as above)

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions




Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

* Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

20

df)

Days per Claim

—————

Days per Claim

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)


Type of Work Performed


Calf. ulation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total Expenditures

S -f- 15 -

STotal CO!

Days Cred 1"J

V\

Instructions Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected In columns at right.

Date

June 14, 1985Recorded Holder or Agent (Signatur

Certification Verifying Repcyyof Work 7

Mining Claim Prefix T Number

l hereby certify that l have s personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true. ix,^ J "J&f 5 "^ **

Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying

T.G. Bryant c/o GETTY CANADIAN METALS, LTD. Ste. 1200, 150 York St. Toronto, Ont. M5H 3S5Certified by (Signature)

362 (61/9) z f

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File———^M——— Re: Papaonga Lake Property

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survey(s) Proton Magnetometer Survey Township or Area Papaonga Lake area,Kenora-Red Lake Claim Holder(s) GETTY CANADIAN METALS, LIMITED——-

Ste. 1200, 150 York St. Toronto, Ont. M5H 3S5 Survey nnmpany GETTY CANADIAN METALS, LIMITED Author of Report D. Graham (ed. J. Hanneson)^_____ Address of Ant W c/O GETTY CANADIAN METALS, LIMITED Covering Dates of s..rvPy Feb. 24 to March 10, 1984

(linecutting to office)

Total Miles of Line Pit 76.8 l km. Previously claimed withgeological work

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical—Electromagnetic——Magnptnmptpr 20

—Radiometric————Other-——————

DAYS per claim.

Geological.Geochemical.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision crediti do not apply to airborne surveyi)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic, . Radiometric(enter days per claim)

June 14/85 SIGNATURE:.Author of Report or Agent

Res. Geol.. .Qualifications. 1111Previous Surveys

File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

KRL 621589 KRL 621617

621591******4****4t *******4***

..6.2A5.9.2..........

621619*************t****ti***

..........621622.

621597 621629

..621598.

621599

..621630.

621680

,,.,,,6^6.08..,.......,..,....6^MO..

621611

621613•62161^'621615

621692

621701

621758

TOTAL CLAIMS.45

l

J

S37 (5/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS -- If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

4943Number of Stations —Station interval 12.5 m magnetics, 25 m MM TT

Profile scale N/A—————————,———.^—

.Number of Readings ——

.Line spacing 100 KV

4943

Contour interval 100 nT below 1000 nT and lOQO nT over 1000 nT

Sswd

Instrument Geometrics G816/826 and G826A Base Station f Cri6i

Accuracy — Scale constant l gamaaDiurnal correction method Used base station recorder ddte. Base Station check-in interval (Hniirs)C:npH-ipnoiip 1110^^0^1^19; 2flBase Station location and valueBeside Papaonga Lake Tourist Cartp; 60,330 nT

InstrumentCoil configuration Coil separation .— Accuracy _____ Method:

Frequency————

CD Fixed transmitter CD Shoot back D In line CD Parallel line

Parameters measured.(specify V.L.F. station)

O

InstrumentScale constantCorrections made.

Base station value and location

Elevation accuracy.

z2t-*N̂h**

tt*(H-

2o(iL

CZ

s^

b̂r^

1c^

Instrument .—————^-— Method CD Time Domain Parameters — On time .——

- Off time ——.— Delay time.— Integration time.

Power.Electrode array — Electrode spacing . Type of electrode

CD Frequency Domain— Frequency ————— Range ________

SELF POTENTIALInstrument——————————————————————————————————————— Range.Survey Method —————^——^^-———-————-————^——————-—-——————--.

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRICInstrument ———Values measured .

Energy windows (levels)———————.^.————.————..——.—.-—^^^^——...—————

Height of instrument____________________________Background Count, Size of detector-————-———————————————-—.^—...,—————..—™.Overburden .———-----——^^.-—^.—...—.-^^^-——--—.——...—.—-——.——-—.-..-———.

(type, depth — include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey.————-————^————^^^———— Instrument _________________________Accuracy^——^—--——-.—--—————.—..———...—.Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS Type of survey(s) ——— Instrument(s) —————

(specify for each type of survey) Accuracy-————————^———^—

(specify for each type of survey) Aircraft used.—————————^—————————.^——-————.—.

Sensor altitude-Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude_______________________________Line Spacing—— Miles flown over total area__________________________Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)

Average Sample Weight——————— Method of Collection————————

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth———— Terrain————————

Drainage Development——————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent D

p. p. m. Dp. p. b. D

Cur Pby' Zn,

Others————

Ni, Cd, -Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)

Field AnalysisExtraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used——

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. -——————————

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis————

Extraction Method. Analytical Method . Reagents Used.——

Commercial Laboratory (- Name of Laboratory-— Extraction Method__ Analytical Method —— Reagents Used ————.

.tests)

.tests)

.tests)

GeneraL General.

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File——-—————— Re: Papaonga Lake Property

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Snrvey( s) Proton Magnetometer and Max Min TT_____ Township or Area Papaonga Lake,Kenora-Red Lake Mining Dist. Claim Hnlrlfr( s) GETTY CANADIAN METALS, LIMITED--^————

St. 1200, 150 York St. Toronto, Ontario 755 Survey Company GETTY CANADIAN METALS, LIMITED.——————. Author of Report D. Graham, J. Hanneson (Ed)——————— Address of Author C/o GETTY CANADIAN METALS, LIMITED———— Covering Dates of Survey Feb. 10 to March 20, 1984——————

(linecutting to office)

Total Miles of Line rut22.2 I.km, previously unclaimed (Part of a total of 99 I.km, on property)

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical—Electromagnetic—20.—Magnetometer———ill-Radiometric—————-Other—————————.

DAYS per claim.

Geological.Geochemical.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credit* do not apply to airborne lurveyi)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic.

HATE.

(enter dayi per claim)

14 ' 1985 SIGNATURE:

. Radiometric

t or Agent

Res. Gcol.. . QualificationsPrevious Surveys

File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

KRL 775222

775223

775224

775225

775228

775229

.mm.

.225231.......................................

.225233.......................................

.225235.......................................775237•/•/*V(HtW*****t •••i****i************************t*i*

.7.2524Q.........................................2752*8.......................................

.77585SI..........................................

..775860.........:.............................

..7.75861.......................................

775865

l

TOTAL CLAIMS. 19

837 (5/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations 3.537 (Mag); 639 (EM)_________Station interval 12.5 magnetics; 25 m MM IT Profile scale_____Magnetics - not applicable; EM

.Number of Readings 1537 (Mag;) 1278 (EM)

.Line spacing 100 n\________________

Contour interval Magnetics - 100 nT below lOOOnT and 1000 nT over lOOOnT? EM-npt applicable

Instrument Geometrics 816/826 and G826 A Base Station S Canadian Mining Geophysics MR-10

Accuracy — Scale constant . l gannB___________________________BaseDiurnal correction method Used base si-ai-inn recorderBase Station check-in interval (hours) Continuous rnonitorim; 20 second interval Base Station location and value Beside Papaonga lake Tourist Canp? 60,330 nT _

S

a

Instrument Max Min 11 H.L.E.M.Coil configuration Horizontal; coplanar

Coil separation 150 m Accuracy ____L-l—— Method: Frequency_

D Fixed transmitter 444 and 1777 Hz——-———

D Shoot back X23 In line D Parallel line

(specify V.L.F. station)

Parameters measured In gfese and out-of-phase

O

Instrument.Scale constantCorrections made.

Base station value and location

Elevation accuracy.

INDUCED POLARIZATION

Instrument

Method D Time DomainParameters — On time

;* off timefcj > — Delay timeto — Integration time*-t b W Power

Electrode arrayElectrode soaciner .

CD Frequency Domain FrequencyRange

Type of electrode

SELF POTENTIALInstrument_______________________________________ Range.Survey Method —————————————————————————————————————————

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRIC Instrument—.——Values measured.Energy windows (levels).——-—^-——.—-——^———-————————..————-—.Height of instrument____________________________Background Count, Size of detector———^^^-———————-—————————-————.—-——.—-——.-...—.Overburden .--.-^—^—^—.—-——.--———..^--———..—.-^.—.——.—.————————.—

(type, depth — include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey-———^-^^^^^—^^^————.—.-——Instrument _________________________Accuracy.——^————--————-——————--—--——Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS

Type of survey(s) ——— Instrument(s) —————

(specify for each type of survey)Accuracy——————————————-—

(specify for each type of survey)

Aircraft used.—————^——————-^—^-—.———————...^^—.Sensor altitude.Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude——————..———.--—-,—-————-—....————Line Spacing——Miles flown over total area__________________________Over claims only-

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)

Average Sample Weight——————— Method of Collection.^———————

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth———— Terrain————————

Drainage Development——————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

.ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent

p.p. m. p.p.,b.

D OD

Cu,~ Pb, Zh, Ni, Co, Ag,

Others_______________

Mo, As.-(circle)

Field AnalysisExtraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used——

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. ___________

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis ^———

Extraction Method. Analytical Method - Reagents Used ——

Commercial Laboratory Name of Laboratory, Extraction Method Analytical Method.Reagents Used ̂ —^

.tests)

.tests)

-tests)

General. General.

a rio

Ministry ofNaturalResources

1985 11 04 Your F1le:76-85 8. 78-85 Our F1le:2.8235

Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Affairs and MinesP.O. Box 5003Red Lake, OntarioPOV 2MO

Dear Sir:

RE: Notice of Intent dated October 2, 1985Geophysical (Electromagnetic b Magnetometer) Surveys on Mining Claims KRL 775222, et al, in the Papaonga Lake Area

The assessment work credits, as listed with the above-mentioned Notice of Intent, have been approved as of the above date.

Please inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so indicate on your records.

Yours sincerely,

jctor Land Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-4888

cc: Getty Canadian Metals, Limited Toronto, Ontario

Encl.

Mr. G.H. FergusonMining fc Lands CommissionerToronto, Ontario

Resident Geologist Red Lake, Ontario

s 1*jk

sr"

,i

i

f;-* .,

1

i

i,

1

1:

.f '

:

'jf

iiii

1

it

l

+ 1

it

f'.

|.B?!.' 'i

B}'

|GN Ministry of Technical Assessmen iVyl Northern Affairs .,. . 0 ,.. \SJ and Mines Work Credits Ontario

t File

2.8235Date Mining Recorder's Report of

Work No.1985 11 01 78-85

Recorded Holder

GETTY CANADIAN METALS, LIMITEDTownship or Area

PAPAONGA LAKE AREAType of survey and number of

Assessment days credit per claimGeophysical

qpMagnetometer J t- riays

Section 77 {19} See "Mining Claims Assessed" columnf

Geological days

Geonhemical riays

Man days | | Airborne | |

Special provision |~)t Ground [XI

l | Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims,

l | Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant,

Mining Claims Assessed

KRL 775222 to 25 Inclusive 775228 to 31 inclusive 775233 775235 775237 775859 to 62 inclusive 775864-65

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

yio credits have been allowed for the following mining claims{(~| not sufficiently covered by the survey | | insufficient technical data filed

KRL 775240 775248

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical - 80; Geologocal - 40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19)-60.

828 (85/9)

© Ministry of Technical Assessmen Northern Affairs ... . - .., and Mines Work Credlts

Ontario ^^

t

Date

1985 11

File

2.8235Mining Recorder's Report of Work No. -- n r04 76-85

Recorded Holder

GETTY CANADIAN METALS, LIMITEDTownship or Area

PAPAONGA LAKE AREAType of survey and number of

Assessment days credit per claimGeophysical

Elertrnmagnetir i (J clays

Magnetometer -^ days

Other Hays

Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column

Geological days

Georheminal days

Man days | | Airborne | |

Special provision ^] Ground fjj

[~] Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

j l Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Assessed

KRL 621589 621623 621626 621680 621686 621690 621701

to 600 inclusive

to 30 inclusive to 84 inclusive - 87 to 92 inclusive

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims[)(] not sufficiently covered by the survey | | insufficient technical data filed

KRL: 621601 621604 to 07 inclusive 621609 to 11 inclusive 621613 to 15 inclusive 621617 to 19 inclusive 621622 621758

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical - 80; Geologocal - 40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19) - 60.

828 (85/9)

tario


1985 10 02 Your Files: 76-85 l 78-85 Our File: 2.8235

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesOntario Government BuildingBox 5003Red Lake, OntarioPOV 2MO

Dear Sir:

Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with statements listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets.For further information, if required, please contact Mr. R.J. Pichette at 416/965-4888.

Yours sincerely,

rundt ftor

Land Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3

0 ^

Ends.

cc:

cc:

Getty Canadian Metals, LimitedSuite 1200150 York StreetToronto, OntarioM5H 3S5D. Graham (J.Hanneson,Ed)c/o Getty Canadian Metals, LimitedSuite 1200150 York StreetToronto, Ontario M5H 3S5

cc: J.G. Bryantc/o Getty Canadian Metals,

Limited Suite 1200 150 York Street Toronto, Ontario M5H 3S5

cc: Mr, G.H. FergusonMining ft Lands CommissionerToronto, Ontario

845


Ontario

Notice of Intent

for Technical Reports

1985 10 02

2.8235/76-85 i 78-85

An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged.

If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application.

If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded.

If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Land Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.

B46 (82/5)

QettyGetty Canadian Metals, Limited Suite 1200,150 York Street, Toronto, Ontario M5H 3S5 * (416) 863-0487

September 20, 1985.

Ms. S.E. Yundt, Director,Land Management Branch,Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources,Room 6643, Whitney Block,Queen's Park,Toronto, Ontario.M7A 1W3

Dear Ms. Yundt:

Re: File No. 2.8235- Geophysical (E.M. and Mag.) Surveys submitted on Mining Claims KRL 621589 et al in the area of Papaonga Lake___________________

In response to your letter addressed to Mr. Bryant of our office and dated August 29, 1985, I am returning two electromagnetic plan maps (in duplicate) which have been modified as requested to show the actual readings taken at each survey station. I trust that this will put everything in good order and I thank-you for your concern to this matter.

incerely yours,

.D. Ewert, Project Exploration Geologist, Western Canada.

WDE:rp encl.

c.c. R.I. Coll G. Jarvis

August 29, 1965 File: 2.8235

Getty Canadian Metals, Limited Suite 1200 150 York Street Toronto, Ontario M5H 3S5

Attention: J.G. Bryant

Dear Sir:

RE: Geophysical (Electromagnetic it Magnetometer) Surveys submitted on Mining Claims KRL 621589, et al, in the Area of Paponga Lake

Enclosed are some of the Electromagnetic plans (1n duplicate) for the above-mentioned survey.

Please show the actual readings taken at each station point, and return the plans to this office.

When returning this material, please quote file 2.8235.

For further Information, please contact Dennis Kinvi g at (416)965-4888.

Yours sincerely,

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1H3 Phone:(416)965-4888

D. K1nv1g:mc

cc: Mining Recorder Red Lake, Ontario Files: 76,. 78-85

End.

1985 07 05 File: 2.6235

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesOntario Government BuildingBox 5003Red Lake, OntarioPOV 2MO

Dear Sir:

Ne received reports and maps on June 24, 1985 for a Geophysical (Magnetometer and Electromagnetic) Survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claims KRL 621589, et al, In the Area of Papaonga Lake.

This material will be examined and assessed anda statement of assessment work credits will be Issued.

We do not have a copy of the report of work which 1s normally filed with your office prior to the submission of this technical data. Please forward a copy as soon as possible.Yours sincerely,

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-4888

A. Barr:me

cc: Getty Canadian Metals Limited Suite 1200 150 York Street toronto, Ontario M5H 3S5 Attention: J.G. Bryant

Gettyi or," f * i' *.'-- * f . "i

Getty Canadian Metals, Limited Suite 1200, 150 York Street, Toronto, Ontario M5K (355^416) 863-0487WO J11.1 i * i - -. *--i l v i,j. , i . { j J

J f!J'.!M'-;it ilEAJE Q]

3une 20, 1985. j. .'I..

Ms. S.E. Yundt, Director, Land Management Branch,

a, t. yrv:'T j

i

o;..-j -so a, 00-13 {

Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, f ' V^ j Room 6643, Whitney Block, f \ .. i 0 00=3 : Queen's Park,Toronto, Ontario. "" J l H O - : '- ri M7A 1W3

Dear Ms. Yundt: _ ^

Re: Application for Ground Geophysical Survey Assessment Credits for Claims KRL 621589 et al and KRL 775222 et al Papaonga Lake Property, Kenora- Red Lake Mining Division, Northwestern Ontario-—---^^——-—--^-^

Please find enclosed copies of "Reports of Work" requesting assessment credits for ground magnetometer and Max Min II H.L.E.M. surveys over the above mentioned mining claims. The original "Reports of Work" were forwarded to Mr. S. Rivett, Mining Recorder, Red Lake, Ontario separately.

Although there are only 20 additional days geophysical credit which can be requested for claims KRL 621589 et al, I have requested that both the magnetometer and EM survey be considered so that the maximum number of days credit may be obtained for claims with only partial coverage.

Also enclosed are the "Technical Data Statements" to accompany each "Report of Work" and two complete copies of the in-house report entitled "A Report on the 1984 Winter Geophysical Program, Papaonga Lake Property".

I trust you will find everything in order.

Sincerely yours,

RECEIVED

Bryant,Exploration Geologist, M lMG LANDS SECTION Central Canada. UI-VMVH

3GB:rp encl.

c.c. R.I. Coll G. 3arvis

Getty Canadian Metals, Limited Suite 1200, 150 York Street, Toronto, Ontario M5H 3S5 - (416) 863-0487

3une 20, 1985.

Mr. Scott Rivett, Mining Recorder, Kenora-REd Lake District, Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario Government Building, P.O. Box 5003, Red Lake, Ontario. POV 2MO

Dear Mr. Rivett:

Re: Application for Geophysical Assessment Credits for Claims KRL 621589 et al and KRL 775222 et a] Papaonga Lake Property, Kenora- Red Lake Mining Division, Northwestern Ontario ______

Please find enclosed Reports of Work for the following:

20 man days (maximum balance allowable) for ground magnetometer and EM surveys on claims KRL 621589 et al.

60 man days per claim for linecutting, ground magnetometer and EM surveys on claims KRL 775222 et al.

The report entitled "A Report on the 1984 Winter Geophysical Program, Papaonga Lake Property" and the "Technical Data Statements" will be forwarded to the Land Management Branch at Queen's Park in the next few days.

l trust you will find everything in order.

Sincerely yours,

^.^r^RECEIVED

JUN 2.] 1985

'''j.G. Bryan( M !N| NG LANDS SECTION Exploration Geologist, Central Canada.

3GB:rp encl.

c.c. R.I. Coll G. Jarvis

i

Mining Lands Section

Control Sheet

File No

TYPE OF SURVEY

MINING LANDS COMMENTS:

GEOPHYSICAL

GEOLOGICAL

GEOCHEMICAL

EXPENDITURE

Signature of Assessor

Date

92 0 00

51*00'-

59

7• ZICXI | 62l*2ij*Z"ie2*'*fl*90 *tl5*Vt .*t

""KKV . KRL/ l "Kiir~!"~K(fL~7 KRiAyMs\\s x ,s x ^ ' P(L. . - l . - .. . i if. - - i . . . . . . ^ te' Al 62[788330 {788321 l

• 21614:821*^8 |62l*22*t1*I*|62T6t9 1*21591 162^595^

KRL KRL T KRL j KRL/1 KRL KRlA iKRLffi ̂ is\ 7\ //' t̂u*ll*23\ 6Z1827 ,*fl*30 l *2rt*2 UzH** |62I6OOMlli l *4^ B

|77557I (775580 (775581 (775590 (77559t '775600 — — -\-—

KRL I KRLS80^| 77^581 (775590 [775591 ' 775600^^^^

i IfDl . h*B* l u*t. l ..— . l

— —i- —J. __l__-i.— -J — LV— — fi-. v01 H um , . vbi TI i/oi'' T trm/ k1*l j—^ IVBI * bvi

KRLW KBL J/KRL '

(775877 773878 j 775879 j

KRL ! KRL i KRL775574 1775577 775584 1775587 l 7^.^ 1775597J l l ' rJ*33;W '

KRL )KRt~ ~~ ~~

1 ll .778575 .775876 775585 775586? 775595 . 7735!

(775871 '778872 '77S873

• ('•99*21*62 l *2I**5 J 621*6* . 621*71 | 621*74

775SI8 775519 ! 775630

•J 1,"* l*'"**]*"*42 J *2t*4Bl*ei*4* 1*21*51 ]*2Ke4

..'IHIL T ML'"^'^ J KRL l KM. '^~K*T ""KltL ' * - . iII l l l

mmM^^ -^ -*^m^*'::'^";^'^

LEGENDHIGHWAY A ND ROUTF No

OTHER RdADS

TRAltb

SURVEVE D LINESTOWNSH PS RASE . iNES, E T' LOTS V'N'NG ' "LAiMS PARMiS

UNSl'M .1 - ' i ; L iNfr S i t r -. 'PA-', t Sil . NMAH \

MINlNi l AIMS E T C

RAILWAY AN[) RIGHT Of AA v

UTILITY l ,N( S

NON PtRfNNlAiSTRlAM

FLOODtN JR M OOUlNG w KJ M T s

SU8DIVIS" ' N OR COMPOSITE P i AN

RESERVA'iQNS

ORIGlNAi SHOREI iNt

MARSH Of MUSKEG

MINES

TRAVf RSI MONUMf ST

DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS

IYPEJ)F DOCUMENT SYMBOL

PATENT. SURFACE St M INING RIGHTS *

.SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY B, MINING RIGHTSONLY . O

LEASE,SURFACE A MINING RIGHTS H

" .SURFACE HIGHTSONL> B

" . MINING RIGHTSONL v B

LICENCE OF OCCUPATION .. T

ORDER IN COUNCIL . OC

RESERVATION ... .. ©

CANCELLED ,...... ®

SAND&GRAVgL ..... 0

NOTE M INING RIGHTS IN P A B L i LS PA l t NT{ M P W L J PI TO MAY t '913 VESTED IN ORIGINAL PATENTED 8- '"f PUBLICLANDS ACT HSO 19'0 C MAP 310 S t C 63 SuBStC t

REFERENC ESAREAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSITION

M. R O. MINING RIGHTS ON LV

S.R O. SURFACE R IGHTS ONLY

M 4 S MINING ANO SURF AC t H l UK 'S

Description Ordwr No Data Oupotmon File

SCALE : 1 INCH = 40 C HAINS

o tooo 2000 4OOO 6OOO *OOO

O TOO METRES

1OOOt l KMI

7000(2 KM

AREA

CURIE LAKE*

MN R ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT

SIOUX LOOKOUTMINING DIVISION

RED LAKELAND TITLES/ REGISTRY DIVISION

KENORA ( PATRICIA PORTION)

Ontario

Ministryof LandNatural M*n*flResources Branch

FESRUARr, 1 964. Nvmhtr

G-1998

o

JUBILEE LAKE -

i ~* — ̂ ----t-- —

—(W/7SD JM.W7

l-1 L J^. —ip^ y * I., —*w i---,

*?3i*i^"^?^t^?* ^ '-^.^'^r, :^w^;. - ^^fe^^Xit^SiiS: ^ -*",^fr*i*2**;w f "ti

PERKY LAKE -

ft E F E R E C E SAREAS WITHDRAWN FROM

M.R.O. - MINING BIGHTft ONLY

S-H.O. - SURFACE IWStHTSONl.*M.+ S. - MINING W4O SUflFACC R IGHTS

Ordir No. O*ti Oi^twition IPtti

LEGENDHIGHWAY AND ROUTE No

OTHER ROADS

TRAILS

SURVEYED LINES.TOWNSHIPS, B ASE L INES, ETCLOTS, MINING CLAIMS, PARCELS. ETC

UNSURVEYED LINESLOT LINESPARCEL BOUNDARYMINING CLAIMS tTC

RAILWAY AND FUGHI Of WAY

UTILITY LINES

NON-PERENNIAi STREAM

FLOODING OR FLOODING RIGHTS

SUBDIVISION OR COMPOSITE PLAN

RESERVATIONS

ORIGINAL SHORELINE

MARSH OR MUSKEG

MINES

TRAVERSE MONUMENT

DISPOSITION Of CROWN LANDS

TYPE Of DOCUMENT

PATENT, SURFACE Si MINING RIGHTS

. SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY ..

, MINING RIGHTS ONLY..,,.. .

LEASE, SURFACE 8, MINING RIGHTS .

" .SURFACE RIGHTSONLY^.....

MINING RfGHTSONLY .. .

LICENCF OF OCCUPATION .

ORDER-IN-COUNCIL . . . .. - .^RESERVATION ... ,. . ....CANCELLED .............. ,SAND A GRAVEL

SYMBOL

eQ

Ha v

oc

®

WOTC: M INING RtGHTS IN PARCELS PATENTED PRIOR TOMAv fi. 1913. V ESTED IN ORIGINAL. PATENTEE 0V THi PUBLIC LANDS ACT RSO 1970. CHAP 3*0. SEC S3 SU*StC 1

SCALE: 1 INCH ^ 40 C HAINS

FEETO 10OO iOOO 4OOO 6000 aooo

O 200METRES

TOWNSHIP

100C ' KMI

2OOO{3 K M)

AHfA

AVIS L A K E

M.N.R. ADMIMISTMTIVI DISTRICT

RED LAKEMINING DIVISION

RED LAKELAND TITUS/ Ut fi l ST IIY DIVISION

KENORAMinistry ofNatural NI*nM*mentResources

Ontario

AltaJANUARY,1903

G-l 7 3

re-i

m

S2KI6NE8004

2.8235 CURIE LAKE

220

LEG

EN

DC

reek

Sho

relin

e

^~

fy/

Mag

netic

de

pres

sion

x-—

—-

tsom

etrt

c co

ntou

rs

IOO

nT

in'e

rvol

be

low

IQ

OO

nT10

00 n

T in

terv

al o

ver

lOO

OnT

Dat

um :

60,O

OO

nT

. In

stru

men

ts --

Geo

met

rics

G -8

26

P

roto

n M

agne

tom

eter

Can

adia

n M

inin

g "G

eoph

ysic

s M

R-1

0 B

ase

Sta

tion

^f, M

i "-

r' O o

r- o

Ho

UC

HI

PR

OJE

CT

PAPA

ON

GA

LA

KE

MAG

NET

OM

ETER

SU

RV

EY

GRI

D P

L-l

DR

AW

N B

Y:

,C

HE

CK

'DB

Y:

N.T

.S.

H tt

DAT

E:

MA

Y/8

4

DR

AW

'G N

o.

PL

I-I

SC

ALE

: /;

Off o

o

Get

ty C

anad

ian

Met

als,

Ltd

.

7*"

-

T i.

6 ~*5 -r

y*

6

+ I

70

\y-

r

*7 'fi

-; -7

*-

- t

i*/

^

-•4

-t-

f/

0 •f/ -l.

-T'

•9-f (9

•r o

i 1 ;

a

- ,

l- -m

s

\ ' \

r. ' \

' 1:

"i

"

\v"

^v*

1 * 'S

ffr'

/i ''

, '

7 i'

'y X -

C,

*3. "ft

*?

- *

1 J

It

\ 't

*

i ,

- i

* -^

*-t

\ '

i*

*

.U

t-

F -

" -*

fJ-

- i

x -B

f(

j .

^

i! \

1;

- ——

- ——

- —

— —

——

——

——

— —

— . ••

unii

i i..

- fV

-v

x T

' *"' ";

. -l/

',

.' w

.K-

~(O

*f

H

* —

/c

**^

** i

f

4 f)

i

* *"

*/

/; ., i

' .,

H .''

\*

1 H? -

7 -v

\K

-' .

-' V-

-,

s -6

o

1 -'7

--

s.

l \ -t

\ ;-,

t \

•*

^ v

- V

F \

l

-to

i \•^ l.

j. -i/

. -f

| :;

—

r! 7

/

'l

'K

-'C^

-A

;/ -o

.-'

i -r

-t ~/ ~/ -r

^ t/^Z

-

-V *^/

-f -f o-f

*

*r f2 ^

-f

-y

-vr.

"o

x-/

O

-Ht-

..'

'3 *t

-l-

- V

-l,

i "4

4V-

O

-f G

*/

-•-t

i/:-J.

j;

-,^X

-20 -i

-f

*

O

it i.^

*

f l

i

-; ^

-f

^;

-c

;li

^3 '3 y-i

^

-s

' (V

. ^'T

,

o O

*

-r

-r/

Scal

t

52KI6NE0004

2.8235

CURIE LAKE

230

i .

\:

t'

. , .

,: k'

.^4

,

: - 'l f

•ft

\o

'

O

* -^

0

1 4L

-

1 Q

* {

1 |

' '

* -

1~

r '

ti

i

1 i

* ^

a J

i *^

ti

j i—

f

d

J

1

^

**l

*

/-'

f "~

* ^

*i

\i

x

fi

O

**

O

* ( t ft

1 O

* i t v

^

c?

* 1 1t- f

tt

- t f

* 1

O

4-

, ,

. .

•^ 1 * i

150

m*t

rw

.j

T LO C

N

•A !!i n;

V) l i

S it- : it

Nj

NJ

'U V N

MJ

i,'o

x ^) N

Scal

e50 L

-50

100

50 m

etre

s J

. LE

GEN

D-

——

[r,

, ph

os*(

ter

* -

IOCX0

, po

sitiv

e w

est)

- --

-

Qua

drat

ure

(lcm

- I

Q'/o

, po

sitiv

e w

est)

"W"

Con

duct

ivity

O

rtem

oly

erm

fab

ility

an

omal

y

NO

TE

S

CO

tL

SE

PA

RA

TIO

N

150

met

res

OP

ER

AT

OR

S'

R G

lLllC

K,

GE

OC

AN

EX

, L.

TC

J P

LA

OU

ISE

LL

E

, G

EO

CA

NE

X

h x l Nl -

r. l; /i

A

fi h

52K16NE00M 2.3235 CURIE LAKE

Vi)Vi

o••yUiVn Oi

l V\ \

^̂̂> o-s

k]\"*

*N •^

HJi-'QT-

^^xi

PAPAONGA LAKE

c^

- -r/

^i

" i ! ' J

^

.u ^^T-

MJ

-' i ! \

\

A

"T-

O ; Z

50 i

Scale50

l(00

l150 metres

o oLEGEND

—— —— In - Phase ( lcm ^ iQVo , positive west J

— w-w- - Quadrature! (cm r 10 0Xo , positive west )

i—...Mr",, Conductivity anomaly

ilify onotDoly

NOTES

COIL SEPARATION 100 metres

- R GJLLICK, GEOCANEX, LTDJ P LAOUISELLE , GEOCANEX, LTD

•^•iii'

52K16NE08C4 2 .8235 CURIE LAKE 250

UC

HI

PR

OJE

CT

PAPA

ON

GA

LA

KE

Mag

netic

de

pres

sion

som

etric

co

ntou

rs

IOO

nT

inte

rval

be

low

lO

OO

nT0

00

nT

inte

rva

l ove

r lO

OO

nT

Dat

um

60

, O

Ou

S2K16NE0ee4 2.8235 CURIE LAKE

2G

0

\in

stru

men

ts

Geo

met

rics

G -8

26

Pro

ton

Mag

neto

met

erC

anad

ian

Min

ing

Geo

phys

ics

MR

-10

Bas

e S

tatio

n\

MAG

NETO

MET

ER S

URVE

Y Gr

id P

L-2

E

DR

AW

N B

Y:C

HE

CK

'DB

Y-

N.T

.S,

DATE

: M

AY

/84

DR

AW

'GN

o:

PL

2-I

fSC

ALE

; l;

2500

Getty

Can

adia

n M

etal

s, L

td.

Join

sM

ap

PL

2-l

e

*1 k

•k.

4L

Be a

. o e

?o

*JD

X X

\\ \ \

±

^

Bfi

aoer

POM

b

Sca

le50

O0

0 m

etre

s

LEG

EN

D

77S

"Z*3

C*J

L

Sho

relin

e

^4^y)

Mag

netic

de

pres

sion

,sc

met

r,c

con

cu

r,

l^^f^lo

frr^n

1!

Dat

um

60

,00

0 n

T

Inst

rum

ents

G

eom

etric

s G

-82

6

Pro

ton

Mag

neto

met

erC

anad

ian

Min

ing

Geo

phys

ics

MR

-10 B

ase

Sta

tion

52K16NE8004 2.8235 CURIE LAKE

UC

HI

PR

OJE

CT

Papa

onga

La

ke

Mag

neto

met

er

Surv

ey

Grid

P

L-2(

w)

DR

AW

N B

Y:C

HE

CK

'DS

Y:

J.E

.H^

N.T

.S.:

DAT

E:

M A

Y/8

4D

RA

W'G

No:

P

L2-lw

SC

ALE

: M

25O

O

Get

ty C

anad

ian

Met

als,

Ltd

.

S o-A

1 .J

-4rx

5 -J

.s '-OOS

<

-4

x

ir

l '-t 1 l

s

•x

jl l\

! *

i l l! M

ill i; 1 ** i* -

2e

\

^

n •y •lO-

ii e-

'viIV

-t- o

//'

S2K16NE0084 2.8235 CURIE LAKE

7 7 7 7 //s

LEGEND - — in - Phase ( icm = I0 0/*, potitwe west)

x-- Ouadroturtilcm s IOV* t positive west )

m~ C onductivity anomaly

P*fm*ability anomaly

NOTES

COIL SEPARATION 150 metr*i OPERATORS^ R.GILUCK, GEQCANEX, LTD.

J P LAOUiSEUte, GEOCAWEX, LTD

Scale50

l

Tr ; -'.', ..^vvv-'-T^T7 ^5: I^U^'^^; 7;f?f^W

100 metres l

300

/J

.x.

N

•i. 7

L. L- OO

LEGEND

—— . —— in - Phase ( tem = i0 0Xo , positive west)

--K-- Quadrature (fern : lOVo t positive west)

/' Z

Conductivity anomaly

Permeability anomaly

NOTES

COIL SEPARATION 150 metres

OPERATORS' R GILLICK, GEOCANEX, LTDJ P LAOUISELLE , GEOCANEX, LTD

52K16NE0ee4 2.8235 CURIE LAKE 310

SV"

-J k)CN

*.'

; f

\-

Scale

50 100 metres

foo

t-f-00fi/

CU

RIE

LA

KE

LA

KE

LA

KE

PA

PA

OA

/GA

-r - -

--

L A

K" E

-- -

r-

pa

pa

on

ga

A-:--

— -

SY

MB

OLS

Lake

Stre

am

Per

imet

er o

f P

aten

ted

Cla

ims

held

by

ot

hers

B D

C

laim

po

st (

tied

in to

gr

id;

loca

ted

durin

g re

cce

wor

k)

Cla

im

bour

tdar

y (o

n la

nd;

ouer

w

ater

)

Grid

Ar

ea w

ith

Base

line

indi

cate

d

Ope

n gr

ound

su

bjec

t to

ins

pect

ion

by

Min

ing

Rec

orde

rS

ourc

es:

Com

pile

d fro

m

1983

B

19

84

geol

ogic

al

map

s 8

1984

D

DH

lo

catio

ns

81 g

eolo

gy

map

Not

e:

Top

ogra

phic

ba

se

deriv

ed

from

h

50

,00

0

Top

ogra

phic

M

ap20

0 l l

O20

0

-L.

400 l

600

-J—

800

Met

res

Sca

le

PAPAONGA LA

KE PROPERTY

UC

HI

VO

LCA

NIC

B

ELT

,

N.W

.ON

TA

RIO

CLAI

MS

aG

RID

LO

CA

TIO

NS

Q, 1

235-

DR

AW

N B

Y:

J.G

.B.

CH

EC

K'D

BY

; J.

G.B

.N.

T.S.

: 52

K 1

6

DAT

E:

AP

RIL

.

19

85

DR

AW'G

No:

3

SCAL

E:

L: 1

0,00

0

Getty

Can

adia

n M

etal

s, L

td.

k,.

L-.

--S

i*.

•--"

*:-:

,:'ff

i •-

',.' - '.

*" '

. ".

. i

t t

-\f

^,

^--~

~^K

~~'^

l i~" —

*~~^

~^i

-^*

1 \ ^

-/i.

j-^-^

^ -1

2-

Cf-

^

——

i s

~^o

\

- ^*

-35-

-! i i

~l~

^j^

- ——

" ,/

ir

i-t

7

-/

l- '

X --

i^

,-*

u-

x\

l !

\

^ 1

- - M \

-i•-

1 1r-/

.xj i'

11 r

^

"^

^^ i J'!

*3*'

!{

w

•V*

ST-

.\

^--

.V *

-a \i

\-

-i*

*Jp

-^fr

-W

* •'-4

.-V

r"-,

r\i

y '^

—^^

x*'

•-^

^-l/

V t i-w

*

*-T

^2.

*U

-r ^

^

-

f

*'

\ :

\ ; v

*-T

\

" -

^,

\ \

-'O

-

-fi ~

*

Ni

^\

*\-O

L.

-/T,*.

——

— —

-J

'iir- —

M - —

,u

T~—

~^'

* -'t

Vi

j'i—

e-'

, *

— —

— ̂^

v *

^-f3

^

, xl

/', -

" i

* " "

-— —

—

! '

0

f *'

-^y '

J- 5

-

t'

O1 1

•^"

- f

Pi

j-^'

-r

. r?

,

-t-*?

-"

f

i'•: i

+ 1

. *.

- *-v

' j 1

*"

* G

•+I o

^

2d

— f

-3

t -/S

T

s-l •z -l

X •\

-f' O o o -v ^ f'

'K

l

-V -l o

-

-'.

-3—

—

Co

nd

uctivity

onom

afy

Perm

eabi

lity

anom

aly

NO

TES

CO

IL

SE

PA

RA

TIO

N

150

OP

ER

AT

OR

S

R.G

ILiiC

K,

GC

OC

AN

EX

LT

D

J P

uA

CU

'SE

LLE

.

GF

OC

iNiE

X,

LTD

PAPA

OIfS

A

LAK

E

HLE

M

SU

RV

EY

G

RID

52KlbNE0a04 2.R235 CURIE LAKh

(y-

il l l

1 t 1 f li V 1 I 1 x. 1 1

^ f l \ x 1 x 1 1 1 x 1 1 x

i l K t \ t 1 1 - i

X J 1 K \ X l jl

jl

II F i x J i K •i ii XF

'i 'i M M* i\ i . i/ i* x- 1: 'i '1 x* li li *t x1

i! iil ii l :

n l

tt

K- l l\

i.

If

f

iil .i..-

oo

Scal

e50 U

-0 i

100

met

res

LEG

EN

D

——

in

- p

hase

( (c

m -

iQ

'Vo

, po

sitiv

e w

est)

--x--

Qua

drat

ure

(icm

- l

O'/o

, po

sitiv

e w

est)

Con

duct

ivity

an

omal

y

S

Pe

rme

ab

ility

an

omal

y

NO

TE

S

CO

IL

SE

PA

RA

TIO

N

150

met

res

OP

ER

ATO

RS

^ R

GIL

LIC

K,

GE

OC

AN

EX

, LT

D

' J

P LA

OU

ISE

LL

E ,

GE

OC

AN

EX

, LT

D

UC

HI

PR

OJE

CT

PAPA

ON

GA

LA

KE

HLE

M

SU

RV

EY

G

RID

P

L-2

(4

44 H

z)

CH

ECK

-OB

Y:

J.E

.H.'

N.TS

.:

OW

E:

MA

Y /8

4

SCAL

E:

I-2S

OO

Getty

Can

adia

n M

etal

s, Lt

d.

URIE LAKE i GRID PL-l SURVEY MAPS APPENDIX A i TO...1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 w DRAWING...

Documents

Transcript of URIE LAKE i GRID PL-l SURVEY MAPS APPENDIX A i TO...1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 w DRAWING...