The Promise of Embedded Design Generation Turning Coders ...
Update on Review of Embedded Generation Benefits
description
Transcript of Update on Review of Embedded Generation Benefits
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight line.
Update on Review of Embedded Generation Benefits
Andy Wainwright
2
Background
Standard Licence Condition C13
Introduced at BETTA (2005)
Addressed different treatment of 132kV connected small generation in Scotland (transmission) with that in England and Wales (embedded)
Time limited: due to expire 1st April 2016
Embedded review needs to consider overall implications on GB generation
Informal industry focus group established Spring 2013
3
Objectives of transmission charges
Cost reflectivity
Facilitate competition
Developments in transmission businesses
Recover transmission costs
Non-discrimination
Affected transmission ‘charges’
TNUoS BSUoS Losses
Focus Group agreement to consider TNUoS first
4
TNUoS Charges - Locational Element
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
A B C D E
Gen
Dmd
TNUoS Locational Elements only
Charging Zones
Ta
riffs
Net approach
Embedded generation nets with demand
Therefore subject to a negative demand locational signal
Based on output at Triad
Equivalent to generation signal: zoning limitations
Gross approach
Embedded generation receives same generation signal as transmission connected
All demand receives locational signal
5
The effect of the generation residual element
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
A B C D E
Gen
Dmd
Avoidance of generation
residual charge
Embedded generator avoids paying generation residual element
6
The effect of the demand residual element
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
A B C D E
Gen
DmdNetting of positive demand
Positive demand can avoid paying the demand residual element if able to net with embedded generation
Embedded generation therefore has a value equal to the demand residual element
7
Combination of both residual elements In summary, embedded generation can receive TNUoS ‘benefit’
through two effects on residual elements;
netting of positive demand (i.e. reducing demand charge)
avoidance of generation residual charge
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
A B C D E
Gen
Dmd
Avoidance of generation
residual charge
Netting of positive demand 2 x Residual
uplift
8
Year Cost Residual
2012/13 £1.41/kW £27.07/kW
2009/10 £1.30/kW
(equates to £1.47/kW in 2012/13)1
£20.74/kW
(equates to £23.53/kW in 2012/13) 1
1 RPI factor for 2009/10 to 2012/13 = 1.132992
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
£/kW
Project
Annuitised demand related infrastructure costs
Average
How much benefit should be paid for offsetting +ve demand?
NGET GSP infrastructure reinforcement costs
9
Average TNUoS charge: £7.57/kW (2013/14)
Transmission Function (Use) Transmission connected G
Embedded G
Net transfers inject NetAccess to Market (s) GB & wider EU
Security / Quality of Supply
Should embedded generation pay for transmission?
How does embedded generation use transmission?
Comparing transmission and distribution charges
Note 2013/14 average TNUoS charge: £7.75/kW
10
Other areas under consideration
Impact on >100MW generators
Exporting GSPs
Offshore Transmission Implications
11
Next steps
National Grid report to be published October
Include Focus group & bi-lateral discussions
Three week open letter
Formal CUSC modification proposal potentially later in Autumn