Update Culture Safety Nuclear · 2012-12-04 · Timeline May 2009 Concerns with the source of...
48
0 FPL® Nuclear Safety Culture Update January11, 2011 Enclosure 2
Transcript of Update Culture Safety Nuclear · 2012-12-04 · Timeline May 2009 Concerns with the source of...
0F
PL
®
Nuclear
Safety
Culture
Update
Janu
ary11,
2011
Enclosure 2
Agen
da
•O
peningC
om
men
ts,In
trod
uctio
ns
G.
St.
Pierre
VP
Fleet
Sup
po
rt
•N
uclearS
afetyC
ulture—
Values
and
Prin
ciples
G.
St.
Pierre
Ap
pro
ach
VP
Fleet
Su
ppo
rt
G.
St.
Pierre
•P
athto
Sustain
ability
VP
FleetS
up
port
G.
St.
Pierre
•N
uclearS
afetyC
ultureP
rogram
Statu
sV
PF
leetSu
pport
J.S
chaffer
•N
SCD
ashboard
sN
SC
Pro
jectLead
M.
Brvce
•H
um
an
Reso
urces
Up
date
VP
Hu
man
keso
urces,
Nuclear
•T
urkeyP
oin
tN
SCS
tatus
M.
Kiley
VP
Turkey
Point
•S
t.L
ucieN
SCS
tatus
R.
An
derso
nV
PS
t.L
ucie
•E
mployee
Co
ncern
sP
rog
ram&
Co
ntracto
rInitiatives
D.
Low
ensD
irectorN
uclearA
ssuran
ce
•C
losingC
om
men
tsP.
Wells
VP
Organizational
Su
ppo
rt
0F
PL
2
Enclosure 2
FP
LA
ttend
ees
Gene
St.P
ierre
JenniferS
chaffer
Mike
Bryce
Rich
Anderson
Mike
Kiley
Dave
Low
ens
Pete
Wells
Larry
Nicholson
Mitch
Ross
JimV
oorhees
Mike
Waldron
VP
Fleet
Support,
NS
CS
ponsor
Nuclear
Safety
Culture
Project
Lead
VP
Hum
anR
esources,N
uclear
VP
St.L
ucie
VP
Turkey
Point
Director
Nuclear
Assurance
VP
Organizational
Support,
NSC
Sponsor
Director
Licensing
VP
/General
Counsel,
Nuclear
Fleet
EC
PM
anager
Director
Nuclear
Com
munications
0F
PL
.3
Enclosure 2
Tim
eline
May
2009C
oncern
sw
ithth
eso
urce
ofalleg
ation
s
Sep
tember
2009F
PL
initiates
root
cause
evalu
ation
Octo
ber
2009F
irstN
RC
public
meetin
g,
FP
Lp
resented
root
cause
findin
gs
Seco
nd
NR
Cpublic
meetin
g,
FP
Lreview
edA
pril2010
action
san
dpro
gress
Janu
ary2011
Com
pletin
gco
mm
itmen
tfor
additio
nal
update
04
FP
LE
nclosure 2
Nuclear
Safety
Culture
Values
and
Prin
ciples
App
roach
Su
stainab
ilityth
rough
Nu
clearE
xcellen
ceM
odelC
ore
Valu
esan
dP
rincip
les
0F
PL
1N
uclearExcellence
Model
CooductallactM
tlestodem
onstratea
deeprespect
BatetyG
uidingPilnclples
forN
uclearsalety
FocusedExcellence
Operationally
Passionfor
EngagedLeaders
EffectiveLong-Range
strongTeam
work
EngagedEisployees
Bea
Self-Improving
ColtoreB
s,n
trvetto
oFostera
work
envlonment vitlere
LearningO
rganizationeiaInivae
Corc
ctieitieswe
arethe
erlthlOyerof choice
Vision
We
area
teamthat delivers
consistent excellentperformance
Mission
We
willproduceenergy
ina
safe,reliable,cost
effective
way,whilecaringfor
ourem
ployees, comm
unitiesand
theenvironm
ent
—
Values
Core
Principles
StrategicFocusA
reas
Responsive
toEffective
StandardizedStabeholders
Worhforce
PlernibsgProcesseo
Effectiv
eSupervisors
Workilfe
Balance
StrongO
wnership
&A
ccountability
Operational Excellence
Organizational
Effectiveness
a.IIL
EffectiveB
usiness&
FinancialPerform
anceG
enerationR
eliability
iiIIlI
5
Enclosure 2
G)
=-
C-)
Cl)
C.)=z
C.)
0
00
C’)
0
0V
(I)
=
>
(0
Enclosure 2
Nuclear
Safety
Culture
Values
and
Prin
ciples
Ap
pro
ach
Conductall activitiesto
demonstrate
adeep
respecttarNuclear Sate
t
FP
L.
-
RespectforN
uclearSafety
We
areco
mm
ittedto
excellen
cean
dp
rofessio
nalism
inth
eco
nd
uct
ofour
activities,
and
we
endorse
the
following
prin
ciples:
•E
very
on
eis
perso
nally
responsib
lefo
rnuclear
safety.
•L
eaders
dem
onstrate
com
mitm
ent
tosafety
.•
Tru
stp
ermeates
the
org
anizatio
n.
•D
ecision
-mak
ing
reflectssafety
first.•
Nuclear
techn
olo
gy
isreco
gnized
assp
ecialan
du
niq
ue.
•A
qu
estion
ing
attitude
iscu
ltivated
.•
Org
anizatio
nal
learnin
gis
emb
raced.
•N
uclear
safetyunderg
oes
con
stant
exam
inatio
n.
OurSafetyGuiding
Principles
1.Allinjuries
arepreventable
2.Leadership
isresponsible
forpreventing
injuries
3.Plan
safetyinto
ourw
ork
4.Look
outforeach
other
7
Enclosure 2
Nu
clearS
afetyC
ultu
reV
alues
and
Prin
ciples
Ap
pro
ach
4.Effective
Com
munication
andH
andoffs
CF
PL
r
IA
Great Work
Environment
To
help
ensu
reth
atF
leetteam
mem
bers
hav
eprid
ein
what
they
do,
enjo
yth
ep
eop
leth
eyw
ork
with,
and
trust
leadersh
ip,
FP
LN
uclear
isco
mm
ittedto:
OurFiveOutage
Principles1.R
espectIndustrial
andN
uclearSafety
VF
requ
ent,
timely
and
candid
com
municatio
ns
VS
up
po
rtfo
rw
ork
-lifebalan
ceV
Elim
inatio
nof
low
-valu
ew
ork
VP
erform
ance
imp
rov
emen
tto
min
imize
crisisre
sponse
VL
eadersh
ipreco
gn
ition
of
emplo
yees
as
ou
rm
ost
valu
able
resou
rceV
Lead
ership
empow
ering
emplo
yees
toen
gag
e,gro
wan
dreach
their
fullp
oten
tialV
Build
ing
trust
and
acting
with
integ
rity
2.NoShortCuts
IR
ushing
3. BeD
eliberate
5.BePrepared
Fostera
work
environmentw
herew
eare
theem
ployerot choice
8
Enclosure 2
Nuclear
Safety
Cu
lture
Org
anizatio
n—
April
2010
CN
O
Nazar
NS
CO
versh
t
PTN
NSC
Team
Kiey
DA
EC
NS
C:
PBN
SC
Team
:T
eamII
osta
nzoj
Meyer
Site
Nuclear
Safety
Team
sR
esponsibilities
•C
oordinationof
NSC
initiativesat
site•
Sponsor
NSC
implem
entationat
sites•
Recom
mend
actionsto
NSC
Oversight
Com
mittee
0F
PL
Pro
jectL
eadS
chaffer
Nuclear
Safety
Culture
Oversight
Com
mittee
Responsibilities
•M
onitorFleet
NSC
activities&
actions•
ProvideN
SCoversight
•P
roposeI
approveN
SCactions
•R
eport-outat
CN
RB
PS
LN
SC
Team
Anderson
Project
Lead
Responsibilities
•O
verallproject
support•
Projectlogistics
andadm
inistration•
Process
andtem
plates•
Statu
stracking
andm
onitoring
JBN
SC
SB
KN
SC
Team
Team
Schaffer
Freem
an-
9
Enclosure 2
Nu
clearS
afetyC
ultu
reO
rgan
ization
—N
ovem
ber
2010
Site
Nuclear
Safety
Team
sR
esponsib
ilities
•C
oordinationof
NSC
initiativesat
site•
Sponsor
NSC
implem
entationat
sites•
Recom
mend
actionsto
NSC
Oversight
Com
mittee
0F
PL
Nuclear
Safety
Culture
Ov
ersigh
tC
omm
itteeR
esponsib
ilities
•M
onitorF
leetN
SCactivities
&actions
•P
rovideN
SCoversight
•P
ropose/
approveN
SCactions
•R
eport-outat
CN
RB
CN
O
Nazar
NS
CO
versig
ht
Com
mittee
Wells
Project
Lead
Schaffer
Pro
jectL
eadR
esponsib
ilities
•O
verallproject
support•
Project
logisticsand
administration
•P
rocessand
templates
•S
tatustracking
andm
onitoring•
Program
turnoverto
linem
anagement
•C
onvertcorporate
roleto
Oversight/G
overnance
PS
LN
SC
PT
NN
SC
JBN
SC
SB
KN
SC
DA
EC
NS
CP
BN
SC
Team
Team
Team
Team
Team
Team
Anderson
Kiley
Schaffer
Freem
anC
ostanzoM
eyer
10
Enclosure 2
Th
eP
athto
Sustain
ability
From
April
2010M
eeting—
Root
Cau
seC
orrectiveA
ctionsC
losed
Sin
ceA
pril2010
--
NSC
ProgramIm
plementation
atthe
Northern
Sites
--
Key
Com
munications
Initiatives--
Nuclear
Safety
Culture
Dashboard
Pilot--
Safety
Culture
Training
andA
wareness
--
Safety
Culture
Survey
andO
rganizationalC
ultureInventory
Survey
--
Nuclear
IntegratedR
esourceP
lanning/Aggregate
Impact
Index
•E
mployee
Co
ncern
sP
rogramIm
pro
vem
ents
—F
aceto
Face
Debriefs
with
Concern
ees
—T
hree
Month
Follow
-upon
Effectiv
eness
—M
onthlyM
eetingsw
ithS
iteV
iceP
residen
tsan
dC
NO
—C
ontracto
rS
afetyC
ultureInitiative
011
FP
LE
nclosure 2
The
Path
toS
ustain
ability
2009N
SC
Root
Cau
seA
ctionS
tatus
—AN
Corrective
Actions
hav
ebeen
com
pleted
—F
inalE
ffectiven
essR
eviewsch
edu
ledfor
Jun
e2011
—N
SC
Dash
bo
ardP
ilot
—Interim
Effectiv
eness
Review
Conducted
April
2010
--
Early
signsshow
progressw
ithrespect
toaw
arenessof
NSC
programand
processes
--
Consciousness
ofN
SCat
theforefront
ofthe
leadershipteam
--
Mini
SCW
Esurvey
atPSL
andIN
POO
ES
urveyindicated
thatthe
organizationis
recognizingand
prioritizingN
SC
--
EC
Penhancem
entsare
improving
employee
trustand
utilizationof
theprogram
12F
PL
Enclosure 2
Th
eP
athto
Susta
inability
Co
mm
un
ication
shav
ebeen
akey
focu
s—
Fleet
NSC
website
—F
ocused11
%of
allF
leetw
idecom
munications
articleson
NSC
—A
llH
andsM
eetings,incorporate
NSC
updatesand
sitesstatu
sprogress
onN
SCactions
—2011
Com
munication
planfocus
onexcellence
inw
orkbehaviors
includingen
han
cemen
tsto
theN
SC
NSC
isconstantly
andconsistently
reinforcedas
oneof
our“core
values”13
FP
LE
nclosure 2
Ou
tag
eC
ore
Valu
es
and
Prin
cip
les
Com
pleteP
lannedW
orkIm
provedE
quipment
Reliability
(Do
WhatW
eSaid
We
Were
Going
To
Do)
Prevent
JobS
toppage
Prevent
JobP
reventR
ework
Delays
No
Rushing!
No
So
rtC
uts
Effective
Respect
forN
uclearP
reventO
uta
ge
Co
reIndustry
Safety
Events
Misunderstanding
Hand-offs
Prevent
Com
munication
InaccuraciesT
urnovers\\P
III1cIpIe,”
Be
Deliberate
Be
Prepared
(Look
Ahead
&R
iskP
reventS
upportP
reventM
akingM
anagement)
Activities
fromInappropriate
Becom
ingD
ecisionsC
risis
Prevent
Injuries
Improved
Team
work
IncreasedS
afetyM
arginL
ateralIntegration
Aligning
Nuclear
Safety
Culture
with
Existing
Values
andP
rinciples
14F
PL
.E
nclosure 2
St.
Lucie
&T
urkeyP
ointO
urindividual
work
behaviorssu
pport
site&
fleetpriorities
Useformalprocesses
andfundam
entalsconsistently
toenhance
oarnuclearsafetyculture.
Focusresources
onEPU
Ispavethe
waytsrsuccessful
equipmentm
odificationsduring2012
EPUoutages.
Reisethe
baronsite
andFleetoutage
performance.
Createa
cultureof strung
teamw
orkthrough
alignmentand
effectivecom
munications.
on
efleet
•o
ne
team
•one
goal
•excelle
nce
CF
PL
®
‘ion
EnhanceN
uclearSafety
Culture
St.LucieSite
Priorities
PreventSafetyEvents
throughaggressive
hazardidentificaiton
Establishan
operationallyfocused
organizationto
ensureescellent
mafedalcsnddion
tosupport
lang-farmuafe
andreliable
operation.
Successfullyplan
andim
plement
EPU,majorprojectsand
refuelingoutages
rTurkeyPoint
SitePriorities
StrengthentIre
asecufionotthe
Work
Managsm
unfprocess
toassure
highlevelsofequipm
entreliabilityand
improve
workersafely.
Optimize
Performance
Improvem
ent(CAP,Equipment
Reliability,Human
Performance,
ChangeM
anagement)
Successfullyprepare
forandasecuta
twoEPU
eutuges.
Engageem
ployeesin
LowValue
Work
Reductionand
workload
phoritization
Reinforcestandards
fur qualityuf
workesacutiosto
promote
safelysod
preventevents.
Ensuresiatalnabilty
oftheim
prsvamants
incausalanalysis,
andim
pruvaim
plamastaitun
ofCsrrechveAction
Program.
Work
Behaviors
Createa
highlyaffective
cross-functionalteam.
Thisincludes
LhWR,alignm
entwithFleetStaffisg
plan,effective
utilizationoftheresources
webane,and
synargiesthroughbraaldng
downsilos
andcrsss-fanctiooalbarriem
.
•Safety
isour#1Priority
•Align
Work
Habits
toReflectOur
I
Fundamentals
•U
seH
uman
Performance
Tools•
Dem
onstratePride
inourW
orkSite
ChallengeSupervisors
&Co-W
orkersto
FollowProcedures
&Im
proveEach
Day
15
Enclosure 2
FP
L®
NSC
Dash
board
s
Jennifer
Sch
affer
NSC
Pro
jectL
ead
Enclosure 2
NS
CD
ashb
oard
Pilot
Learn
ing
s
•F
PL
and
the
Industry
areev
aluatin
gvario
us
tools
and
metrics
tom
easure
NS
C—
Continued
activeengagem
entw
ithN
EIand
INPO
•D
ashboard
based
onth
e8
INPO
Safety
Cultu
reP
rincip
les
•C
urren
tversio
nis
stilla
work
inpro
gress
•In
dicato
rco
lor
cod
es—
Traditional
industryindicators
usegreen,
white,
yellow,
redperform
ancecriteria
basedon
aggressivetop
decile/quartileindustry
performance
—N
on-traditionalindustry
indicatorsuse
white
andblue
criteriabased
onsite
specifichistoric
performance
•N
SCteam
s’usag
eof
the
dash
bo
ard—
Understand
culturecan
notbe
measured
exactly—
Dashboard
isa
toolfrom
which
we
attempt
tom
easurethe
healthof
theculture
017
FP
LE
nclosure 2
Nuclear
Safety
Culture
-S
ite
Dashboard
Turk
ey
Poin
t
OR
GA
NIZ
A11O
NA
LE
FFEC
TIV
EN
ESS
Month
End
Quarter
End
Sponso
rO
wner
IndicatorN
ov-20103Q
10M
ikeK
ileyJose
Alvarez
OE
-63
IS
iteN
uclearS
afetyC
ultureH
ealthI
Every
one
isP
erson
allyR
esponsib
lefo
rL
eaders
Dem
on
strateC
om
mitm
ent
to
Nuclear
Safety
Safety
NR
CA
llegationsIE
RO
Diii
—
—[
Clearance
Errors
lndeuj
[S
afetyW
orkordnr‘=
12reorst4
______________________
____
____
____
____
MR
FFS
taffinglevels
Total
Pof
EC
Pconoenf
IG
rievances‘N
uclearS
afetyC
ultu
re1
[T
SA
R101111
Nuclear
Safety
IU
nd
ergo
esI
AQ
uestio
nin
gI
II
IN
uclear
Tech
no
log
yis
Reco
gn
izedas
Sp
ecialan
dU
niq
ue
Aftitu
de
isO
rgan
izational
Learn
ing
isE
mb
racedI
IC
onstan
tI
Cultiv
atedI
IE
xam
inatio
nI
IS
iteP
roced
ure
Health’
CR
InitiatIonR
ateT
raining0
bsero
ation
s
[Index
Station
Hum
anI
IndexI
IF
eedback
receivedvialI
Unex
cused
Training
[SA
SM2I
Perfom
vanceN
SC
eI,site
Absen
cesI
___________________
___
____
____
____
____
Operable
but
Degraded
__
__
__
__
IliiC
oo
fb
rltW
al
Oprl5r
ncy
InidicalorK
ey
Pending
deN
oQ
oarte
ly:
M:nthly
FP
L.
Persern
elC
Onta,nle
Eo.rdu
Com
ponen
tM
ispositioningIndex
Tru
stP
ermeates
the
Org
anizatio
nNR
CA
lfegatiennto
No
Disciplinary
action
DP
Os
subm
itted
Decisio
n-M
akin
gR
eflectsS
afetyF
irst
aof
Rink
Sig
Red
&N
umber
of2C
meetin
gr
Volantary
Sep
aration
sY
ellowS
ystem
sheld
OSH
AR
ecord
able
Rate
0DM
Pro
cessU
tilized
r.j
Qfl
Reactivity
Managvnvenl
Open
PMC
R5
IE
quipment
Reliability
Index
Control
Ream
Deficiencies
Ii
11V
fl
CA
PIndex
II
IB
ehav
iors
&A
ction
sth
atS
upp
ort
aS
tron
IN
uclearS
afetyC
ultu
reI
II
Regulatory
Health
Inde,
Operating
Experionoa
Nun*ee
ofM
ajorC
hajtIndex
Mng
Plans
NO
TE
:T
hisdash
board
isgoverned
byA
D-A
A-103
Rev
0S
ection5.2
Based
onIN
POP
rinciplesfor
aS
trongN
uclearS
afelyC
ulture
18
Enclosure 2
Nu
clear
Safety
Cu
ltu
re
-S
ite
Dashboard
St.
Lucie
OR
GA
NIZ
AT
ION
AL
EF
FE
CT
IVE
NE
SS
Mo
nth
End
Qu
arte
rE
nd
Sponsor
Ow
ner
Indic
ato
rN
ov-20103Q
10R
ich
Anderson
Mark
Moore
OE
-63
IS
iteN
uclearS
afetyC
ultureH
ealthI
IN
uclearS
afetyI
AQ
uestio
nin
gI
II
Underg
oes
IN
uclearT
echnologyis
Recognized
asS
pecialand
Unique
Attitude
isO
rganizationalL
earningis
Em
bracedI
IC
onstan
tI
Cultivated
I‘
___________________________________________________________
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
_
IE
xamination
I
IR
egalato
ryH
ealthm
dcN
on-Oxtage
CM
Back
IoO
penP
MC
Rs
LIH
ejjovaI
4C
RInitiation
Rate
Training
observ
ationsi
axeP
roced
areH
ealth1
____
____
____
____
___
Index
IS
tation
Hornan
IF
eedb
ackreceiv
edvialU
neo
casedT
rainingI
SAB
MIndex
2P
erforvnancoN
SC
Web
siteA
bsen
cesR
eactivityM
anngen
eni
Open
Tem
porarysy
ste4
gh
Pm
ssU
Alterations
on
InidicatorK
ey
Pen
din
g
________
_____
_r-
-I
_____
___
_____
_
FP
L5
Everyone
isP
ersonallyR
esponsib
lefor
Leaders
Dem
onstrate
Com
mitm
entto
Nuclear
Safety
Safety
Safety
Workorder
Backlog
Trust
Perm
eatesth
eO
rganization
NR
CA
llegationsll
LC
learance
Errors
lnd
eo
___________________
[PW
OO
pense
12nm
on4
Disciplinary
action
NR
CA
llegationsto
No.jf
0DM
Process
Utibzed
Perso
nnel
Ccn
tanietateo
1tS
ean
tyig
gaim
le
[M
RFF
[Staffing
levelsIL
Total
#01
EC
PC
oncem
fG
rievan
ces“N
aclearS
afetyC
altamej
TISA
R
Od
In
tIn
de
,
Nem
berot2Cm
eeting
1V
olantarSeP
amations
ed
CA
PIndex
Decision-M
akingR
eflectsS
afetyF
irst
OSH
AR
ecordableR
ate
Eqaip
men
tR
eliabilityIndex
Control
Room
Deficiencies
Operato
rW
orkA
roundsiB
urd
ens
Operab
lebat
Deg
rader
MSPI
-C
oolingW
aterS
ystem
sS
ystem
II
Behaviors
&A
ctionsth
atS
uppo
rta
Stro
n
IN
uC
learSafety
Cultu
reI
II
IM
SPI-
Em
ergencyA
CIP
ower
Operating
Experience
Num
bero
fMajo
rCban
gIndex
Mng
Plans
NO
TE
:T
hisdashboard
isgoverned
byA
D-A
A-1
03R
ev0
Section
5.2B
asedon
INPO
Principlesfor
aStrong
Nuclear
Safety
Culture
19
Enclosure 2
0P
PL
®
Hum
anR
esources
Update
Mike
Bryce
VP
Hum
anR
esources,
Nuclear
Enclosure 2
Nu
clearS
afetyC
ultu
reP
rog
ram
Hum
anR
esou
rceA
ctions
•2010
Organizational
Culture
Inventory(O
CI)
—T
he001
surveyw
asadm
inisteredto
3040em
ployeesin
2010.—
Utilized
thesurvey
resultsto
identifyand
encouragebehaviors
thatw
illen
han
cethe
desiredculture
andto
eliminate
behaviorsthat
detractfrom
thedesired
culture.
—S
eniorleadership
isaligned
andcom
mitted
tothe
desiredbehaviors.
•0
21F
PL
Enclosure 2
Nu
clearS
afetyC
ultu
reP
rogram
Lead
ership
Behavior
Monitoring
•In
dep
enden
tA
ssessmen
t—
Contracted
with
RH
RInternational
toassess
desiredleadership
behaviorsand
appropriateattitudes
thatencourage
andsupport
astrong
NSC
.--
“Insum
mary,
theC
ompany
correctlyand
appropriatelyidentified
unsatisfactorypractices
and
behaviorsthat
were
contributingto
safetyculture
challenges.In
response,the
Com
panyhas
designedand
implem
entedan
organizational-wide
initiativeand
interventionactions
toen
han
cethe
safetyculture.”
•O
ngoingM
onitoring—
Ind
epen
den
tw
eeklyreview
ofsu
pp
ortin
gan
ddetractin
gb
ehav
iors.
•E
xitInterview
screenin
gan
drep
ortin
gof
NSC
concern
sand
implications.
22P
PL
.E
nclosure 2
0F
PL
®
Nuclear
Safety
Culture
atT
urkeyP
oint
Mike
Kiley
VP
Turkey
Poin
t
Enclosure 2
Tu
rkey
Po
int
Nu
clearS
afetyC
ultu
re
•A
nindividual’s
beliefsy
stemd
rives
their
individualbeh
avio
rs•
Beh
avio
rch
anges
atth
eS
ite:—
Station
jobp
erform
ance
and
Training
ob
servatio
ns
has
increased
from2008
to2010
—S
tationgoals
establish
edth
atdrive:
--
Reducing
LowV
alueA
ddedW
ork--
IncreasingE
xternalIndustry
Engagem
ent--
Support
Em
ployeeE
ngagement
Perform
ance=
Behaviors
+R
esults
024
FP
L.
Enclosure 2
Tu
rkey
Po
int
Nu
clearS
afetyC
ultu
re
•B
ehaviorch
anges
atthe
Site
—S
iteN
SC
Com
mittee
establish
edw
ithline
emplo
yees
—R
outinebreak
fastm
eetings
with
Site
V.P.
andem
plo
yees
—R
outine2C
s(C
omplim
entsand
Concern
s)m
eetingsbetw
eenm
anag
ersand
emplo
yees
—D
epartment
written
comm
unicationssuch
as:--
Operations,
“AO
MN
otes”--
Maintenance,
“TheM
aintenanceC
ooler”--
Engineering,
“Engineering
Corner”
--
Chem
istry,“C
hem-Speak”
025
FP
LE
nclosure 2
Tu
rkey
Poin
tN
uclear
Safety
Cultu
re
•Im
pro
ved
Em
plo
yee
Engag
emen
t—
Co
mm
un
ityIn
volv
emen
tA
ctivities
--
Strong
United
Way
Participation
--
Salvation
Arm
yA
ngelT
ree--
Thanksgiving
Food
Drive
--
Blood
Drives
--
Em
ployeegroup
involvement
inlocal
schools--
Site
Sponsored
Local
Christm
asF
estival
—E
mplo
yee
Activities
atth
eS
ite
--
Dolphin
FishT
ournament
--
Golf
Tournam
ent--
Children’s
Holiday
Party!
Family
Day
026
FP
LE
nclosure 2
Tu
rkey
Poin
tN
uclear
Safety
Cultu
re
•R
esults
—A
ttritionrate
forvoluntary
separationsat
a7
yearlow
(21voluntary
separationsfrom
Turkey
Point
in2010)
—S
trongIm
provement
inIN
PO’s
Organizational
Effectiveness
surveyfrom
2008to
2010—
April
26th2010,
receivedan
improved
INPO
ratingand
removal
fromspecial
assistance
category—
August
19th2010,
operationstraining
programs
accreditationunanim
ouslyrenew
edby
theN
ationalA
cademy
ofN
uclearT
raining.
—B
argainingunit
employees
areapplying
forsupervisory
positions—
The
majority
ofprom
otionsat
thesite
havebeen
fromour
successionplan
providingcareer
pathopportunities.
027
FP
LE
nclosure 2
Tu
rkey
Poin
tN
uclear
Safety
Cu
lture
•C
hallenges—
Station
staffhas
swef led
with
major
pro
jectsan
dpow
erup-rates
atT
urkeyP
oint.--
1,457C
ontractE
mployees
with
protectedarea
accessas
of1/3/11
—C
ontract
work
forceis
ourfo
cus
in2011.
--
Contractor
2Cs
meetings
with
theirsite
employees
--
On-site
contractorE
CP
offices--
Increasedsite
comm
unications--
Supplem
entalem
ployeetraining
includingoral
boardsthat
probeaspects
ofa
strongN
SC
028
PP
LE
nclosure 2
(0
CDCDCr,
CDCD
0-‘
CD
CDU)
Cn
CD
r+CD
-‘—CD)
00.
Cn-CCD(I)
Cl’C)CD
OC
-IC)—I_zC’)C)
CD
-I-‘
CD
-D2.
zC’)
Cl)
C)
-IC-‘CD
0C
CoCD-D-‘0C)CDC’)(I)CDCl)‘I
C)
0)
0.mC)0-D
0Co0)3Cl)
Enclosure 2
FP
L
Nuclear
Safety
Culture
atS
t.L
ucie
Rich
Anderso
n
VP
St.
Lucie
Enclosure 2
St.
Lucie
Nu
clearS
afetyC
ultu
re
Wh
ereW
eW
erein
2009
•C
orrectiv
eactio
np
rog
ramfo
cus
•L
eadersh
ipalig
nm
ent
onprio
rities•
Prio
ritization
ofreq
uired
wo
rk—
Preventative
Maintenance
—C
orrectiveand
Elective
Maintenance
•E
xtern
ally/in
ternally
driv
en•
Goal
align
men
t•
Feed
back
and
dialo
gue
•E
mplo
yee
com
mu
nicatio
ns
Implem
enta
Focused
Approach
toA
ddressK
eyS
afetyC
ultu
reIn
puts
031
FP
L.
Enclosure 2
St.
Lu
cieN
uclear
Safety
Cultu
re
Actio
ns
We
Implem
ented•
Alignm
entof
goals
with
fleetn
uclear
excellen
cem
odel•
Lead
ership
—org
anizatio
nal
effectiven
esslalign
men
t—
External
resourcesfor
accountableorganization
training
•S
trength
ened
causal
analy
sisan
dC
AP
implem
entatio
n•
Implem
entedfleet
NSC
pro
gram
•R
einforcingN
SCm
essages
invario
us
emplo
yee
com
municatio
ns
•R
evised
pro
cessesto
reinfo
rceN
SC—
Operational
Decision-M
aking—
Failure
InvestigationP
rocess
—R
ootC
ause
Evaluations
032
FP
LE
nclosure 2
St.
Lu
cie
Nu
cle
ar
Safe
tyC
ultu
re
Actio
ns
We
Implem
ented
•E
RIG
Rassessm
ent
Ien
gin
eering
excellen
ceplan
•PM
Program
implem
entationim
pro
vem
ents
•O
utagesco
pe,
prep
aration
andex
ecutio
n•
Additional
main
tenan
cereso
urces
•E
xternalen
gin
eering
sup
po
rtreso
urces
•D
epartment
fundam
entals
rollout•
Superv
isor
oversig
ht
•In
creasedtraining
andqualification
forco
ntract
superv
isors
•F
ace-to-facem
eetings
with
sup
plem
ental
work
ers•
Lead
ership
passio
nfor
safety•
Using
100—
daysco
recard
033
FP
LE
nclosure 2
St.
Lu
cie
Nu
cle
ar
Safe
tyC
ultu
re
Wh
ereW
eare
Today
•Im
provedcau
salan
alysis
•N
oo
verd
ue
conditionrep
orts
•Full
participationin
NSC
Team
•E
mployees
more
informed
andaligned
•M
anagement
awaren
essof
NSC
impacts
•Im
provedd
ecision
-mak
ing
and
com
mu
nicatio
nof
decisio
ns
•Im
provedeq
uip
men
treliability
—Increased
2010index
scores
—R
educedcom
ponentfailures
“Indiv
iduals
feltperso
nally
responsib
lefo
rn
uclear
safetyat
the
sitean
dp
erceived
the
curren
tm
anag
emen
trein
forced
this
messag
e”
NR
CE
A-09-0321
St.
Lucie
Unit
195002
Su
pp
lemen
talIn
spectio
nR
epo
rt034
PP
LE
nclosure 2
St.
Lucie
Nu
clearS
afetyC
ultu
re
Com
municatin
gth
atN
SC
isth
eC
AP
and
EC
PP
rog
rams
site’sto
ppriority
Em
plo
yees
feelfree
toraise
Outag
eP
rocesses
issues
Ind
ivid
uals
understan
dth
eirW
orkloadan
dR
esource
respo
nsib
ilitiesto
report
issues
Allo
cation
s
Contin
ued
Focu
son
Improving
lntern
alP
rocesses
Desig
ned
toA
dd
ressan
dC
orrect
Issues
035
FP
L.
Prelim
inary2010
Safety
Culture
Surv
ey
Stren
gth
sI
Focu
sA
reas
Enclosure 2
St.
Lu
cieN
uclear
Safety
Cultu
re
Where
We
areG
oing
Su
stainab
ility
—N
SC
siteteam
onthe
groundfocused
lookat
performance
--
Frequentoutage
meetings
--
IndicatorD
ashboard
—N
SC
Team
providingoversight,
challenge,and
industrybest
practices
—O
bservationsand
effectivenessreview
s
—F
leetO
versightand
HR
IndependentM
onitoring—
Achieve
Excellence
inE
quipment
Reliability
•A
dditionalIm
pro
vem
ents
—E
ngagingkey
contractors
—Incorporating
emplo
yee
feedb
ack
36F
PL
Enclosure 2
PP
L
Em
ployeeC
on
cerns
Program
Dave
Low
ensD
irectorN
uclearA
ssuran
ce
Enclosure 2
Em
ployeeC
oncern
sR
ecentA
ctivity
1816141210
Li.i1iI.L
I.Hi
Legend
EC
PC
ontacts
Em
ployeeC
on
cerns
NR
CA
llegatio
ns
Actio
ns
beingtak
ento
increase
EC
Puse
atT
urkeyP
oint
0F
PL
St. LucieE
mployee
Concern
Activity
01-1002-10
03-1004-10
05-1006-10
07-1008-10
09-1010-10
11-1012-10
Turkey
PointE
mployee
Concern
Activity
18161412.E
100
8
Ez2
01-1002-10
03-1004-10
05-1006-10
07-1008-10
09-1010-1011-10
12-10
20102010
38
Enclosure 2
ECu
C0
0Cl)
0C0
C)G)a)0
Ew
CG)C0CE0
C-)
04-’C.)CuI
4-’C0
C-)
& —
Cl,Ui
c
__
çD
__
cc’,___ç;%
‘CD(NCDt(N‘D
-JCe)a.
UicSzCl)
a.C)Ui
___ ________
ççbI—
C0010I0(501Cr4-Ci1C0DlDOu
zii0)C,)
Enclosure 2
Em
ployeeC
oncernsP
rogramC
ontractorS
afetyC
ultureInitiative
•C
NO
met
with
FP
L/N
extEra
majo
rco
ntracto
rex
ecutiv
esto
discu
ssim
po
rtance
ofsafety
cultu
reinitiative.
•E
CP
perfo
rmin
gex
tensiv
eoutreach
with
supp
lemen
talw
ork
force
(PTN
Fall
2010o
utag
e—
PS
LJan
uary
2011outag
e).
•N
ewE
CP
languag
eb
eing
placed
insu
pplier
con
tractsap
plicab
leto
supp
liersw
ithth
eirow
nE
CP
:—
Requires
notificationto
FPLof
anysafety
related/qualityissue
orH
IRD
concernsubm
ittedto
contractorE
CP
—FPL
plansfollow
-upto
ensu
resatisfactory
resolutionof
these
concerns
•Q
uarterly
EC
PM
anag
erP
eerC
allsw
ithco
ntracto
rE
CP
cou
nterp
arts(B
echtel,
DZ
NP
S,
William
s,R
SS
Wack
enhu
tp
articipatin
g)
—First
callcom
pleted1/5/11
040
FP
LE
nclosure 2
Em
plo
yee
Concern
sP
rogram
Drivers
For
EC
PU
se
PS
LR
easo
ns
Why
Indiv
iduals
Com
eto
EC
P-2
010
Working
To
Understan
dan
dA
ddress
Underlying
Issues
FP
L.
PT
NR
easo
ns
Why
Indiv
iduals
Com
eto
EC
P-2
010
BR
aisedIssu
eW
ithS
upvB
utN
oA
ctionI
Desire
Confidentiality
DR
aisedIssu
eD
isagreeW
ithR
espo
nse
OF
earof
Retaliation
lAn
on
yrn
ou
s
Dlssu
einC
AP
But
Not
Resolved
lOth
er
aF
romO
utsidethe
Com
pany
22
uesire
ionTiaentiaiity
•Raised
Issue
Wth
Supv
But
No
Action
OQ
ther-
Enter
incorn
rnants
DA
nonyrnous
IFro
rnO
utsidethe
Com
panyO
Relu
ctantto
Discu
ssW
ithS
upv•R
aisedssu
eD
isagree
With
Resp
on
seIW
anted
Issue
onR
ecord
41
Enclosure 2
Em
plo
yee
Concern
sP
rogram
Con
cerned
IndividualF
eedb
ack
•G
oalis
face—to—
facedeb
riefw
ithC
lat
time
ofin
vestig
ation
com
pletio
n:
—R
eviewof
theconcern
investigated—
Discussion
relatedto
discoveredfacts
relativeto
concern—
Results
ofanalysis
—C
orrectiveactions
completed
orplanned
•S
tand
ardfeed
back
questio
ns
asked
attim
eof
EC
Pd
ebrief
(Palo
Verde
Ben
chm
ark):
1.A
reyou
satisfiedthat
EC
Pad
dressed
allof
yourconcern?
Ifnot,w
hy?2.
Are
yousatisfied
with
theresolution
ofyour
concerns?If
not,w
hy?3.
Are
yousatisfied
with
EC
P’s
assistance?
Ifnot,w
hy?4.
Ifyouhad
aconcern
inthe
futurew
ouldyou
feelcom
fortableusing
theE
CP
again?Ifnot,
why?
5.Ifyou
hada
concernin
thefuture,
would
youfeel
comfortable
raisingthe
concernto
someone
inm
anagement?
Ifnot,w
hy?
042
FP
L.
Enclosure 2
Em
plo
yee
Concern
sP
rogram
-2010
Feed
back
Resu
lts
EC
PF
eedbackF
ormQ
uestionY
esN
o
1.A
reyou
satisfiedth
atE
CP
addressed
allof
yourco
ncern
s?If
not,89%
11%w
hy?
2.A
reyou
satisfiedw
iththe
resolutionof
yourco
ncern
s?If
not,w
hy?74%
26%
3.A
reyou
satisfiedw
ithE
CP
’sassistan
ce?If
not,w
hy?96%
4%
4.Ifyou
hada
concernin
thefuture
would
youfeel
comfortable
using94%
6%the
EC
Pag
ain?
Ifnot,
why?
5.Ifyou
hada
concernin
thefuture,
would
youfeel
comfortable
raising70%
30%the
concernto
som
eone
inm
anag
emen
t?If
not,w
hy?
•65
Co
ncern
slRefe
rrals
clo
sed
atP
SL
and
PT
Nin
20
10
•F
eed
back
received
on
47C
on
cern
slRefe
rrals
•F
eed
back
no
treceiv
edon
18C
oncern
slRefe
rrals
(10A
nonym
ous,
8U
nab
leto
co
nta
ct
CI)
EC
PC
usto
mers
Generally
Satisfied
with
EC
Pan
dW
ouldU
seE
CP
Again
043
FP
LE
nclosure 2
Em
plo
yee
Concern
sP
rogram
—2010
Safety
Cultu
reS
urv
ey
Nuclear
safetyand
qualityissues
reportedthrough
Em
ployeeC
oncernsP
rogram(E
CP
)are
thoroughlyinvestigated
and3.74
3.493.73
appropriatelyresolved
Upper
managem
entsupports
Em
ployeeC
oncernsP
rogram3
893
773
95(E
CP).
I canuse
Em
ployeeC
oncernsP
rogram(E
CP
)w
ithoutfear
of3.87
3.73.95
retaliation.
Confidentiality
ofm
yconcern
will
bem
aintainedby
theE
mployee
381
355
383
Concerns
Program
_(EC
P)
atm
y_request.
Averag
e3.97
3.803.99
5=
Strongly
agree,
4=S
om
ewhat
agree,
3=N
eitherag
reeor
disag
ree,2=
Som
ewhat
disag
ree,I
=S
tronglyd
isagree
Gen
eralP
opulatio
nH
asP
ositiv
eA
ttitude
To
ward
sE
CP0
FP
LZ
Iamfam
iliarw
iththe
Em
ployeeC
oncernsP
rogram(E
CP).
Fleet
2010S
afetyC
ultureS
urv
eyR
esults
PTN
PS
LA
verag
e
4.554.50
4.51
44
Enclosure 2
Em
plo
yee
Concern
sP
rogram
-2010
Outreach
Activity
30003000
25002
i12500
22122212
2212221
2000/
2000
J14$
15001500
ioiV1000
694804
804824
83983
1000/
54354
50019
5003—
/
1414/
0i
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
JF
MA
MJ
JA
SO
ND
jF
MA
MJ
JA
SO
ND
-a—-0
—PTII
Cum
ulativenum
berof
siteem
plo
yees
reached
byE
CP
bym
onthduring
2010O
utreachsessio
ns
Ag
gressiv
eO
utreach
Efforts
Will
Co
ntin
ue
During
2011045
FP
L
Enclosure 2
0P
PL
®
Closing
Com
men
ts
Pete
Wells
VP
Org
anizatio
nal
Support,
NSC
Sp
onso
r
Enclosure 2
2011N
uclear
Safety
Cu
lture
Pro
gram
Initiativ
es
•S
ustain
ability
thro
ugh
Nu
clearE
xcellen
ceM
odelC
ore
Valu
esan
dP
rincip
lesA
ppro
ach
•#1
2011F
leetIn
itiative
—E
nhan
ceN
uclear
Safety
Cultu
re
--
NSC
Program
Standardization
toN
EI09-07
Guidance
--
NSC
Fleet
Peer
Team
—A
ssessmen
ts—
Trending
—S
urveysand
Improvem
entP
lans—
NSC
Dashboard
—B
enchmarking
andIndustry
Engagem
ent
Driving
Em
plo
yee
Tru
stin
Intern
alP
rogram
san
dP
rocesse
sD
esigned
toA
dd
ress
and
Effectiv
elyR
esolv
eIssu
es
047
FP
L
Enclosure 2
Path
toS
usta
inability
•N
uclear
Safety
Cultu
rebuilt
intoo
ur
valu
esan
dprin
ciples
based
Nuclear
Ex
cellence
Model
•P
rog
ressh
asbeen
mad
ein
ou
rp
rog
rams,
pro
cesses,passio
nan
dco
mm
itmen
t—
Validated
byinternal,
external,and
independentassessm
ents
•U
nd
erstand
ou
rch
allenges
and
hav
ebuilt
inelem
ents
toen
sure
sustain
ability
•A
lignedan
din
vo
lved
with
new
industry
NS
Cin
itiatives
•O
urgoal
isto
beco
me
the
NS
Cin
du
stryrole
mo
del
Connecting
andE
ngagingthe
Work
Force
48F
PL
Enclosure 2
