Unpacking

38
Interpreting Ambiguous Images Chris Grodoski Northern Illinois University & Franklin Middle School Wheaton, IL

description

Interpreting Ambiguous Images created by Chris Grodoski

Transcript of Unpacking

Page 1: Unpacking

Interpreting Ambiguous Images

Chris GrodoskiNorthern Illinois University

&Franklin Middle School Wheaton, IL

Page 2: Unpacking

Schedule, Goals, and Doughnuts• Presentation Time: 9:00

– 10:45

• Unpacking: an approach for understanding creative visual

imagery: 9:00 – 9:25

• Collaborative Exploration: 9:25 – 9:35

• Workshop: 9:35 – 10:20

• Assessment, Scaffolding, and Review: 10:20-

10:45

Page 3: Unpacking

Part I

Unpacking Ambiguous Images

Page 4: Unpacking
Page 5: Unpacking

Traditional Interpretive Process

DESCRIPTION

ANALYSIS

INTERPRETATION

EVALUATION

Page 6: Unpacking
Page 7: Unpacking
Page 8: Unpacking
Page 9: Unpacking
Page 10: Unpacking
Page 11: Unpacking
Page 12: Unpacking

Meaningful Interpretations

“...[students] want to be certain to get the “right” interpretation, to get the best grade, and they do not trust that their own experience ... They are

not confident enough to take risks, and to create meanings based upon visual signifiers and

their own experiences” (Smith-Shank, 2004, p. 2)

Page 13: Unpacking

What is Unpacking?• A five step process for the

interpretation and production of creative visual imagery

• Phrasing for students: “Images are like suitcases,

they have a lot of ‘stuff’ in them. Since they are not real things, they can be understood in many ways. We have to unpack them, like a suitcase, to see everything inside of them.”

Page 14: Unpacking

Why use Unpacking ?

• Unpacking:– Honors a variety of

creative visual work– Develops student

interpretive process– Can be reversed and

applied to production– Utilizes best practices in

teaching and learning– Highlights multiple points

of view simultaneously– Fosters inquiry

Page 15: Unpacking

Why Unpack?• Integrates symbol processing and socio-cultural learning into student-owned strategies, an

approach advocated for by Efland (2002).• Address James’s (1997) call that art educators should develop “instructional strategies that

help both non-art and art majors to feel confident and knowledgeable about the personal, social, domain-specific, and process-based aspects of engaging in artistic creativity” (James, 1997)

• Unpacking is best instructed through a student-generated visual organizer, which aids in the development of schemata and increases learning retention (Efland, 2002; Glenberg & Kaschak, 2002; Moreno & Valdez, 2005).

• Unpacking highlights connotative and denotative interpretations, as advocated for by Barrett (2003).

• Unpacking provides a way for students to understand that images are created for contexts, as well as that images represent a point of view (Duncum, 2010; Freedman, 1996).

• Finally, this device provides students a way to metacognitively reflect on their own thinking, an important goal for middle-level learners (Arredondo, Blackburn, Brandt, Marzano, & Moffett, 1997; Marshall, 2005).

• Unpacking should be viewed in contrast to interpretive guides like Visual Thinking Strategies (VTS) (Housen & Yenawine, 2000).

Page 16: Unpacking

Unpacking:Actual Function, Emotion, Audience, Image

Reference, & Metaphor

Page 17: Unpacking

Description

• What do I see?• Use formal qualities• Increases focus on

separating meaning & emotion from descriptive processes

Page 18: Unpacking

Emotion

• What feelings are being communicated?

• What feelings am I experiencing?

Page 19: Unpacking

Elevated Conversations around Emotion

“I think that if someone created a spider this big, they are trying to show… if you are afraid of spiders, they would seem big.”

“Interesting theory. So a possible conclusion might be that fear can cause thing to be noticed?”

Page 20: Unpacking

Image References

• What images does this one remind me of?

• Encourage knowledge from popular culture, personal experiences, social knowledge and, when applicable, art world knowledge.

Page 21: Unpacking

Audience

• Who is this image for?• Who would this image

appeal to?• What about this image

would make it appealing to that group/individual?

• Students can identify gender, age, and interests of the audience as a starting point.

Page 22: Unpacking
Page 23: Unpacking

Metaphor

• What might this image symbolize?

• How can I summarize the theme of the image?

• Challenge students to develop one-word themes

Page 24: Unpacking

Getting started• Description: “What do I see?” • Emotion: “What feelings are being

communicated? What feelings am I experiencing?”

• Image References: “What images does this one remind me of?”

• Audience: “Who is this image for? Who would this image appeal to? What about this image would make it appealing to that group/individual?

• Metaphor: What might this image symbolize? How can I summarize the theme of the image?

• Continued Inquiry: What questions do I still have?

Page 25: Unpacking

Part II

Assessment and Scaffolding

Page 26: Unpacking
Page 27: Unpacking

Assessment: Design and composition

Page 28: Unpacking

Assessing Narratives: Convergent thinking and declarative knowledge

Page 29: Unpacking

Increasing Complexity

Page 30: Unpacking

Assessment: Elaboration

Page 31: Unpacking

Assessment: Elaboration

Page 32: Unpacking
Page 33: Unpacking
Page 34: Unpacking
Page 35: Unpacking
Page 36: Unpacking
Page 37: Unpacking

Reverse Unpacking

IMAGE REFERENCES

MET

APH

OR

AUDIENCE

DESCRIPTION EMOTION

Page 38: Unpacking

Thank you!

Chris [email protected]