The Culture of Arranged Marriages in IndiaThe culture of arranged marriages in india
University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is...
Transcript of University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is...
![Page 1: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 1 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
UniversityPressScholarshipOnline
OxfordScholarshipOnline
HinduLaw:BeyondTraditionandModernityWernerMenski
Printpublicationdate:2009PrintISBN-13:9780195699210PublishedtoOxfordScholarshipOnline:October2012DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195699210.001.0001
HinduMarriageLaw
MenskiWerner
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195699210.003.0008
AbstractandKeywords
ThischapterdiscussestheHindumarriagelaw.ItshowsthatneithertheAnglo-Hinduinterventions,northemodernistreformsofthe1950sinindependentIndia,broughtaboutanysubstantivechangeinHindumarriagelaw.ThechapterdiscussesthetraditionalHindulawofmarriage,whichisplacedwithintheproperconceptualframework.ItalsoattemptstodeconstructmodernistmisconceptionsofHindumarriage.
Keywords:Hindumarriagelaw,Anglo-Hinduinterventions,modernistreforms,traditionalHindulaw,marriage,conceptualframework,modernistmisconceptions
WhilemarriagelawhasbeenquiteprominentinIndianfamilylawcases,litigationhasalmostalwaysinvolvedotherlegalproblemsconcerningthestatusofthefemalespouse,herfinancialentitlements,orinheritancerights.ThelegalrecognitionofcustomaryHindumarriagearrangementsalsooftenrelatescloselytobigamy,maintenancelaw,succession,orjointfamilyproperty.Asaresult,thereismuchfuzzinessoverwhatisactuallymeant
![Page 2: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 2 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
by‘marriagelaw’.1Toclarifythisterm,itisnecessarytodistinguishtheprocessofmarriageitself,i.e.marriagesolemnizationandregistration,fromthesocialconsequencesofmarriage.Manyofthelatterarenotofcentralconcerntothepresentchapter,buthavegivenrisetocommentsaboutHindumarriagetraditionsandtheirlegalrelevance.
ThesolemnizationofHindumarriagesisfirstofallamatterofsocialconventionsandritualelaboration,involvingthedramatizationofsocialnormsandallkindsofrelatedbeliefs.2InthetraditionalHindusystemofmarriage,therewasnoroleforthestate,asmarriageremainedaprivateaffairwithinthesocialrealm.Inthetraditionalsystem,thesolemnperformanceofalongsequenceoftraditionalHindumarriageritualswasassumedtoevokementalawarenessofbeingmarried,bothforthespousesconcernedandforthosewhocelebratedthemarriagewiththemandwitnessedit(Derrett1963a).Hindusociety,andnotthestate,legitimizedandpublicly‘registered’allproperHindumarriages.OncetheBritishbecameinvolvedintheadministrationofHindulawandsoughtfixedrules,itbecameanissueofcentralimportanceforlawyershowsuchHindumarriagesaresolemnizedandlegallyvalidated.
ThepresentchaptershowsthatneithertheAnglo-Hinduinterventions,northemodernistreformsofthe1950sinindependentIndia,havebrought(p.274) aboutanysubstantivechangeinHindumarriagelaw.Eventoday,aHindumarriageinIndiadoesnotnormallyrequiretheinvolvementofthestate.Thus,behindamodernistsmokescreenofformallegalreformandcodification,thetraditionalHindulawremainsmoreorlessfullyinplace.3Agnes(2000:210)correctlystatesthat‘underthepresentstatute,aHinduneedneverapproachastatefunctionaryorareligiousinstitutioneitherforsolemnizationofhis/hermarriageorforitsdissolution’.
Here,then,isourfirstsubstantivecaseofpostmodernHindulawinpost-colonialIndia.AnalysingthispostmodernconditionofHindumarriagelawwithinahistoricalcontext,weneedtoaskwhetherthevirtuallycompleteblanketapprovalofancientHindupractices(whichnowofcourseappearintheircurrent,contemporaryavatar)constitutesahiddensurrendertoHindutraditions.Doesitsignifypostmodernrealism,namelythatmarriageissuchanintimatelysocialaffairthatitsformalregulationisbestlefttotherespectivesocieties?Orshouldweapplythe‘limitsoflaw’argumentasanexplanatorymodelforwhythemodernstatelawadmitssocomprehensivelythatitisunabletoregulatetherelevantnormativetraditions?
Itappearsthattherecouldnotbeamoreclear-cutcaseforthepreservationoftheethniccharacteristicsofHinducommunities,ortheidentityvalueofdifferentsocialgroups(Mansfield1993),asdiscussedinPartIofthisstudy.ThemodernstaterecognizesthatitseemsbesttoleavethesolemnizationandevenregistrationofHindumarriagestothejurisdictionofsociety,whileofferingjudicialforafordisputesettlementandjudicialsupervisionasasafeguard.ThisclearlyreflectsanacknowledgementthatwithintheHindusocioculturalframework—andnotprimarilythereforeonaccountofHindureligion—legalmechanismsexistwhichremainabletoexercisemeaningfulsocialcontrolatthelowestlevel,alsotoday.Inthisfieldofanalysis,therewasevidentlylittle
![Page 3: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 3 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
roomforpositivistinterventioninthefirstplace.Butsincethereformersdidnothesitatetointerfereinotherareasofthelaw,whydidtheynotinterveneinHindumarriagelawtoo?ThereasonliesinthepostmodernconditionofHindumarriagelaw,wheretodatethereremainsanuneasycoexistenceofreformistrhetoricandsocioculturalrealism.
TheTraditionalHinduLawofMarriageTheexistingliteratureonHindumarriagehasdevelopedintoacomplexcombinationofoddlymismatchedevidenceandcomments.ThepainstakingstudyofancientSanskriticmarriageritualsisnotamainstreamjobforlawyers,butamatterforSanskritists,historians,anthropologists,andresearchersofreligious(p.275) studies.TherearemanyseriousattemptsbySanskritiststomakesenseofthephenomenonoftraditionalHindumarriageanditsconsequencesinatraditionalcontext.4However,thesestudiestendtobecomeembroiledinritualdetailandthusdiscouragethelegalreaderwholooksforcertain,quickanswers.Writersworkingwithinamodernistconceptualframeworkofreference,andgenerallywithoutaddressingdetailsofHindumarriagelawandpractice,haveproducedabarrageofcriticismsoftheinstitutionofHindumarriage.5SomewhereinbetweenarethosewriterswhodescribethepatternsoftraditionalmarriagebutcannotresistglorifyingHindutradition,fantasizingaboutcertainaspects,orsimplygettingsidetrackedintootherrelatedissues.6
Asaresult,thereexistsasegregationofspecialistliteratures.TheremarkablydetailedliteratureonHindumarriageincludeshardlyanywritingbylegalscholars,whilearesearcheronHindumarriagewilldrawablankinlegaltextbooks,returningtoliteratureproducedbyscholarswhoarenotlawyers.Nevertheless,atleastnon-legalresearchershavebeenabletoelucidatetheconceptualframeworkofHindumarriageanditscentralsocialfunctionsforalllevelsofsociety.WithinaHinduframeworkofreference,itisagreedthateverysingleHindumarriagesolemnizationisamoreorlessconsciousattempttolinkthespousestothecosmicdimensionofHinduismthroughtheperformanceofcertainrituals.7Thesemaybeminimal,incertaincircumstances,8asHindumarriagesneednotbeelaborate,costlycelebrationsthatlastforseveraldays.9
(p.276) ConceptualCore:UnityinDiversityAfulldiscussionoftraditionalHindumarriagelawmustbeplacedwithintheappropriateconceptualframeworkandshouldthereforebeginfromthecentralpremisesoftheṛta/dharmacomplex(seech.3).RightfromtheearliestHinduliterarysourcesonwards,inṚgveda(RV)10.85andinAtharvaveda(AV)14,10wefindtwodetailedsequencesofHindumarriagerituals.BeginningfromsuchVedicfoundations,wehavemassiveevidenceofancientHindumarriagerituals,whichelaborateandrituallydramatizethecentralityofmarriageasacultural,social,andreligiousinstitutionamongHindus.Thedetailedcontextualinterpretationofsuchancientsourceshasremainedproblematic.MyPh.Dthesis(Menski1984)crackedsomeofthesophisticatedcodesoflanguageandpresentationthatdistinguishtheVedictextsasextremelyintelligentandcomplexrepresentationsofhumanmarriagevis-à-vistheHinduuniverse.FromthisVedicperspective,aHindumarriageisseenasthemicrocosmicequivalentofthemacrocosmictogethernessoftheuniverse,assymbolizedinthedailycyclesofsunandmoon.
![Page 4: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 4 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
ContrarytoassertionsbymanymodernHindus,theVedicpatternsofmarriagesolemnizationdidnotconstituteafixed,uniformlybindingmodelforeverycouple.Furthermore,myresearchconfirmsthattheritualelementofthesaptapadī,whichappearstohavebeengivensuchprominencelater,andevenappearsinSection7(2)oftheHMA1955,cannotsatisfactorilybetracedbacktotheVedicstageofmarriagesolemnization.11Instead,itappearsinfullfledgedformonlyinthedomesticritualsectionsoftheimportantclassicalsūtraliterature.ItthusbelongstotherealmofclassicalHindulawwithitsemphasisondharmaratherthanṛta.Italsofitsthereconceptually,ratherthanintheVedicmodel,asitfocusesprimarilyonthetwospousesthatarebeingjoinedinmatrimony,ratherthanthecosmiclinksrecreatedthroughtheirmarriage.Thefull-fledgedsaptapadīisaritualoffriendship(Menski1991b),asolemnpromiseof‘goingthroughthickandthintogether’.Itthusemphasizesthemicrocosmicsphereofdharmamorethananythingelse,ritualizingtheemergingclosebondbetweenthespouseswithinthatconceptualmould.
ThemultipletransitionswithinHindutraditionalpracticesarewellreflectedinthespecialistliterature.Pandey(1969:153)wrotethat‘[w]henreligiousconsciousnessdeveloped,marriagewasnotonlyasocialnecessitybutbecameareligiousdutyencumbentuponeveryindividual’.12Nair(1978:2)confirms(p.277) thatanorthodoxHindumustmarry,‘whetherhebeanidiot,impotentorimbecile,fortheproperdischargeofhissocio-culturalandreligiousduties’.13DuringtheclassicalperiodanditselaborationofdharmicdutiesforeveryHinduindividual,thecentralimportanceofmarriagewasfurtherreinforced.Nowitsupposedlybecametheonlysaṃskāraforwomen.14Withintheframeworkoftheashramatheoryanditssequenceofstagesoflife,itbecameamajorexpectationthateveryone,maleorfemale,shouldbemarried.15DetailedfieldworkconfirmsthatsuchnormsarealsostronglyreflectedincontemporaryIndiansociety.16
ThetopicoftraditionalHindumarriagesolemnizationwasinitselfanoceanofdiversebeliefs,rituals,andpractices.Thesemadesense,ifatall,onlytothosewhopractisedsuchcomplexritualdramatizationsofthetransitionofacouplefromonestageoflifetothenextwithinthevarṇāśramadharmamodelofHindustagesoflife.Astheancienttextstellusinclearterms,therewasvirtuallyunlimitedscopeforlocal,caste,andfamilycustomstobecombinedwiththese‘traditional’Hinduritualelements.Āśvalāyanagṛhyasūtra1.7.1–2(tr.Sharma1976)significantlybeginsthemarriagesectionofthetextwithacommentthatemphasizespluralityandtheoverridingimportanceofcustoms:
Now,manifoldindeedarethecustomsofdifferentareasandvillages,thoseoneshouldobserveatthemarriage.Onlywhatiscommon(toall),thatweshallstatehere.
Ithasevidentlybeenimpossible,fromthestart,tobringanyorderintothiscomplexpatternofunendingdiversity,despitetheunifyingconceptualcore.(p.278) ThisisexactlywhereapostmodernanalysisofHindumarriagelawneedstobegin,intheearlyVedictimes.Hindus,asweknow,havenotbeenworriedaboutthepossiblefissiparoustendenciesofsuchdiversityandplurality,sincevirtuallyfromthestart,Hinduismasa
![Page 5: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 5 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
religioustraditionacceptedavarietyofcoexistinginterpretationsofthisreligion,itsorigins,motivatingforces,concepts,andpurposes.NotmuchseemstohavechangedinthisscenarioofoverlappingconsensussincetheearliestVedictimes.ThroughoutthetraditionalHindulawperiods,aswesaw,thisrecognitionofdiversityismanifestinthetextsthemselves.Significantly,attemptstointroduceuniformingmodelshavebeenmadefromtimetotime,17andthelabelof‘Vedicmarriage’isbeingusedforallkindsofpurposes.18
TheSocio-legalStatusofMarriageasaSacrament
Withinthetraditionalframeworkofreference,thereisnodoubtthatthemostimportanttransitionalpointinaHindu’slifeismarriage.Theleadingstudiesconfirmmarriage(vivāha)asthemostimportantofalltheHindusaṃskārasorlife-cyclerituals.19Shastri(1990:25)notesthatitisdifficulttosaywhenmarriageasaninstitutioncameintoexistencebutitappearsthatVedicmarriagewasalreadyafullydevelopedsocialinstitution.Shastri(1990:26)arguesthatmarriagewasregardedasasacredreligiousunionbroughtaboutbydivinedispensation,butnotacontract.Themarriagesacramentunitedthepartiesinanindissolubleunion.Husbandandwifewereonequalfootingandprayedthattheirloveandfriendshipshouldbelasting,genuine,andindissoluble.ThissoundslikeglorifyingHinduideology,butisaparaphraseofcertainversesthatmightbeusedrituallyinconnectionwiththesaptapadī(seeMenski1991b).Nair(1978:1)describesHindumarriageincontrastwiththecontractualtribalmarriagesystem:
TheorthodoxHindumarriageisasanskaraorsacrament,thelastoftenenjoinedbythesacredscripturesofHindus…Thelegalityofamarriagedependeduponceremonies.TheconsentofthirdpersonswasasessentialtothevalidityofaHindumarriageaswerethereligiousceremonies.
Marriageisundoubtedlyofvitalinteresttosociety,sinceitisseenasthefoundationofthefamily.Fruzzetti(1990:108)emphasizesthenatureofHindumarriageasasacredunionandasthemostauspicioussaṃskāra,sayingthatthesacredconceptionofmarriageinIndiacanbetracedbacktotheageofthe(p.279) Vedas.Shealsoassertsthat‘Manuregardsmarriageasanindividualandsocialnecessity’(id.).OnHindulegaltraditiongenerally,Agnes(2000:11)takesatypicalfeministstartingpointthat,seemstodamageHinduwomenforever:
Itisgenerallybelievedthatthe‘pristine’Hindulawwasparticularlyharshtowardswomenanddeniedthemsexualandeconomicfreedom.Thesetwofreedoms,infact,arecoordinate.TheHindujointfamilystructurebasedonmalecoparcenary,wastheinstitutionthroughwhichsexualcontrolwaseffectedbydenyingwomentherighttoownproperty.Inthisrealmofpatriarchaldomination,womenweretreatedaschattelsanduponmarriagedominationoverthemwastransferredfromthefathertothehusbandwithintheconfinesofperpetualtutelage.Insupportofthispremise,itisemphasizedthatManu,thearchlawgiveroftheHindureligionstipulated:‘Awomanmustbedependentuponherfatherinchildhood,uponherhusbandinyouthanduponhersonsinoldage.Sheshouldneverbefree’.Thestrictsexualcontrolwasalsoeffectedthroughordeals.Sita’sordealbyfireisset
![Page 6: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 6 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
outasanexample.Itisalsobelievedthatthemodernityusheredinduringthecolonialruleandpost-independenceperiodhelpedtoloosenoutthisstrictsexualcontrolbygrantingwomentherightofdivorceandpropertyownership.
Agnes(2000:11)askswhether‘withinthesestrictdictates,theHindulawpermittedanyspacefornegotiatingwomen’srights’.Butshealsonotesthat‘[p]luralityoflawsandcustomsandnon-statelegalstructureweretheessentialcharacteristicsoftheancientIndiancommunities’(ibid.:12).Howthencanonemaintainthattherewereorarestrictnormsthatarebindingoneveryone?ItappearsthatsuchwritingonlyperpetuatesmoderniststereotypesaboutHindu‘tradition’anditsanti-womeneffects.Atthesametime,somewritersarenowbeginningtorecognizethatthetraditionalmethodsofHindumarriagesolemnizationcontinuetoperformausefulfunctiontoday.Whilethisisnotphrasedasapostmodernanalysis,somemodernistauthorsrealizenowthatinsistenceonformalregistrationofallmarriageswiththestate‘wouldadverselyaffecttherightsofwomenandchildren’(Agnes2000:170).
LegaltextbookshavenodifficultyreiteratingthecentralconceptofsacramentalHindumarriageorsaṃskāra,20butdonotoffermuchinsightintoHindumarriagesolemnization.FromaSanskritist’sperspective,Pandey(1969:153–233)discussedinelaboratedetailhowthetraditionalHinduunderstandingofritualsandsacramentsdeveloped.Pandey(1969:153)emphasizedthatmarriageisthemostimportantofalltheHindusacramentsandconfirmedtheassumptionthateveryHindumaleisexpectedtomarry,runahome,andcreateafamily.Pandey(1969:155)placesHindumarriagewithinasocioculturalframeworkofreference:
Marriagewasafamilyaffairratherthanapersonalone;indeedthegenerationofoffspringwasthesuprememotiveofeveryuniontotheendthataman’s(p.280)houseorfamilymightnotdieout.Thenreligiousmotiveswereequallyoperativeinassigningsuchagreatregardtomarriage.Worshipofancestorsandgodswasdependentonprogeny,whichcouldbeobtainedonlythroughmarriage.InlaterdevelopmentofHinduism,thelastideabecamemoreprominentthanthesocialandeconomicones.
ModernistwritingalsoemphasizesthejointfamilycontextoftraditionalHindumarriages,butclearlyseesitinalesspositivelight.M.Basu(2001:3)goesalittletoofarwhensheclaimsthat‘[t]hewesternconceptofthenuclearfamilyconsistingofonlyahusband,wifeandchildrenhadnotemergedthen’.Surelythatconceptwasknown,ifonlybecauseprematuredeathsanddisastersofallkindsconstantlybrokeupjointfamilies,whichwerenottheonlyknownformofsocialorganization.Basuportraysmarriageasasocialalliancebetweentwofamiliesandarguesthat‘[i]twasbelievedthatthewoman’ssoleaiminlifeoughttobetoensurethehappinessandwell-beingofherhusband’sfamily—herownhappinesswasofleastimportance’(id.).Thechiefobjectsofmarriage‘weredharmaorreligiousduty,praja,procreationandrati,sexualpleasure’(M.Basu2001:4).
TheleadingsociologistKapadia(1972:167)placedHindumarriageexplicitlywithinthewidercontextofdharma,andfounditobviousthat‘theHinduthinkersregardeddharma
![Page 7: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 7 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
asthefirstandthehighestaimofmarriageandprocreationasthesecondbest’.Kapadia(1972:168)alsoreflectedontheperformanceofHindumarriagerituals,butseemsrathertoostronglyinfluencedbythelawyers’dogmaticinsistenceoncertaincentralritualelementsofHindumarriage:
Therearecertainriteswhichmustbeperformedformarriagetobecomplete.Themainritesare:homa,orofferinginthesacredfire,pānigrahaṇa,ortakingthehandofthebride,andsaptapadī,thebrideandthebridegroomgoingsevenstepstogether.AlltheseritesareperformedbyaBrahmininthepresenceofthesacredfireandareaccompaniedbytheVedicmantras.Theyarenecessaryformarriagetobecomplete,becausewhentheyoranyofthemarenotproperlyperformed,themarriagemaybelegallyquestioned.Hindumarriageisasacrament.Itisconsideredsacredbecauseitissaidtobecompleteonlyontheperformanceofthesacredritesaccompaniedbythesacredformulae.21
Sharma(1993)discussesthemultidimensionalimportanceofmarriageinancientIndiaingreatdetail,emphasizingtheneedforamantoprogressinthestagesoflife(varṇāśramadharma).Sampath(1969:29)arguesthatmarriageleadstoadifferentstatusinthatitbringsnotonlyphysicalintimacybetweenthetwoindividuals,butalsoeffectsimportantchangesinthelegalandsocialstatusof(p.281) theparties.Sharma(1993:3–4)indicatesthatmarriagewasthecentreandrootoflifeanditsbasiswassexualpower,i.e.theprocreationofthenextgeneration.22Morespecifically,Sharma(1993:9)statesthat,‘[f]romthebiologicalpointofviewtheinstitutionofmarriagewasnecessaryforself-preservationandprocreationofchildren’.Kapadia(1972:168)emphasizedtheroleofmarriageasariteofpassagetooneofthemajorstagesofaHindu’slife,andplaceditfirmlywithinasocialcontext:
Marriagewasasocialdutytowardthefamilyandthecommunity,andtherewaslittleideaofindividualinterest.Thesocialbackgroundprovidedbytheauthoritarianjoint-family,andcastewithitsdominationinallspheresoflife,affordednoscopefortherecognitionofanypersonalfactor,individualinterestsoraspirations,intherelationsbetweenhusbandandwife(ibid.:169).
Again,thelanguageusedheresuggestsfixedpatternswithinapatriarchalsetting,whereasinsocialrealityallthesearrangementswouldhaveremainednegotiable.Similarly,Nair(1978:16)makestheoverstatedclaimthatpatrilocalresidenceis‘absolutelynecessaryamongHindusaftermarriage’.23Qureshi(1978:39)repeatstheusualideologicalhumbugoverHinduhusbandsasgodsandalsotakesatypicallyuncriticalviewofsagesaslawmakers.Thispassageisonlycitedheretoillustratescholarlylackofcare:
TheHindusagesincleartermsholdthatthehusbandis‘thelordandmasterofhiswife’;hemustbeadoredandobeyed,evenifdevoidofallvirtues.Hemustbeobeyedaslongashelivesandthewifeshouldremainfaithfultohismemoryevenafterhisdeath.HeshouldbeworshippedlikeGod,eventhoughheisamanofbadcharacter.
TherearemanyrepetitivecommentsintheliteratureaboutwhetherHindumarriages
![Page 8: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 8 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
arecontractualorsacramental.TheHinduconceptofmarriageasasacramentalunionimpliesseveralthings.Aboveall,themarriageisdeclaredtobe‘divine’innatureandnotamerehumancontractualunion.Onewouldimaginethatithaselementsofboth,butauthorshavebeenemphasizingoneconceptortheothertosuittheirotheragenda.24Sastri(1988:176)describesHinduconceptsofmarriageemphasizingthewiderdimensions:
(p.282) Theyviewmarriageasasacrament,asaholyactwhoserealmeaningandpurposearebeyondthekenofmaterialandmoralscience.Theyregarditasasubjectofinjunction,ofspirituallaworDharmastrictlysocalled,whichshouldbelearntfromtheShastra,fromtheVedaitselfwhichdealswithsuper-physicalandpurelyspiritualmatters.
Qureshi(1978:39)arguesthatmarriageunderancientHindulawwasnotacivilcontract.InthepatriarchalsocietyofṚgvedicHindus,itwasconsideredasacramentalunion,bindingnotonlyinthislife,buteveninthelifehereafter.25However,ithasalsobeenarguedthatHindumarriageisacontract.Qureshi(1978:40–1)states:
AmarriageundertheHindulawisasacredcovenant.InaHindumarriage,thebridegroomhastopromisethathewilllookafterhiswife.Ontheotherside,thebridealsopromisesthatshewillbefaithfultoherhusband.Intheapprovedformofmarriagetheessenceisthetransferofthegift(kanyadan)bytheguardian.
Doesthisamounttoacontractbetweentwomen,then,asrepresentativesoftwojointfamilies?TheirksomeconceptualizationofthebrideherselfasameregifthasledtoprotestsabouthowcallouslyHindutraditionallowswomentobetreatedasapieceofproperty,tobegivenandreceivedinmarriage.WhileM.Basu(2001:2)blamesMuslimsandotherraidersforthebadpositionofHinduwomen,otherwritersbecomedefensive.Sastri(1988:208)emphasizestheAryanideal:26
Marriage,withusaswithseveralotherpeoplesmoreorlesscivilised,isasacrament,aninstitutionhavingadeepspiritualsignificance,andwhosevaluecannotbejudgedfromitsusesandpurposeswhichourexternalsensesalonecangiveustounderstand.Thebreedingofprogenyandmeresatisfactionofthenaturalcravingforsexualcompanionshiparenottheonlyaimsofmarriedlifecherishedbyculturedpeoplesallovertheworld.Amongtheadvancedandculturedracesofpeople,marriedlifeisintendedtoserveotherandnoblerpurposesthanthese,howeveressentialandvaluabletheseareinthemselves.
Manyauthorsaddressspecificaspectsofmarriagearrangements.Mishra(1994:25–35)discussesthequalificationsofthebrideandgroom,whileKarve(1994:60)distinguishesmarriageandwidowremarriage,since‘[a]lloverIndiathewordsfor“marriage”arealwaysdifferentfromthewordsfor“widow-marriage”.Thesecondmarriageofawomanneedednoritualandvows.Itismerelyconsideredalivingtogetherofamanandwomanafterlettingafewfriendsandrelativesknowaboutit’.Agnes(2000:20)alsoshowsthatdifferencesintermsofsocialstrataandthestatusofthespouseswerehighlysignificant:
(p.283) Marriagesamongthevariouslowercasteswerelesssacramentalandmorecontractual.Theritualofsaptapadi(sevenstepsroundthesacrificialfire,
![Page 9: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 9 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
whichisessentiallyaBrahminicalritual)orkanyadandidnotprevailamongthesecommunities.Childmarriageswerenotthenorm.Thecontractualmarriageswerebasedonconsentofadultwomenandtheritualsandceremoniesreflectedthiselementofconsentandcontract.Theritualsofremarriageofwidowsanddivorceesvariedfromthoseofvirginbrides.
TheeightformsoftraditionalHindumarriagearecoveredingreatdetailbymanyauthors.27Pandey(1969:170–1)specificallydiscussestheroleofritualsinHindumarriages,arguingthatreligiousceremoniesareessentialtomakeaHindumarriagevalid(p.170)andthattheyareperformedforlegalisingthemarriage,legitimisingthechildren,andavoidingpublicscandal(p.171).Inhisview,‘[t]henuptialsweresupposedtoimpartsanctitytothemaritalrelation.Henceitwasthoughtnecessarythattheyshouldbeperformedineverycase’(id.).Shastri(1990:40)claimsfurtherthatthepresenceofthewifeisabsolutelynecessaryfortheserituals.AccordingtoPandey(1969:199),theseHindumarriageritualshavedevelopedfrominelaboratebeginnings:
Inthebeginningtheymusthavebeenverysimple.Awomanwasgiventoamanbytheconstitutedauthoritybywhichtheybecamewifeandhusband.Butasmarriagewasaveryimportantoccasioninthecommunity,manyrites,practicesandcustomsarose,whichwereregulatedbythecommunityitself.Incourseoftimethesocietybecamecomplexandmanylocalandchronologicaldifferencescameintoexistence.
AvarietyofculturalfestivitiessurroundedaHindumarriageaswell.Pandey(1969:200)brieflydiscussesthemajorVedicceremonies.Fruzzetti(1990:121)writesthat‘Hindumarriageasasacramentrequiressacredritualsoftwotypes,BrahmanicritualshandeddownfromVedictimes,andlocalritualsperformedbywomen,withouttheinvolvementofapriestandwithoutSanskritmantras’.Sheshowsthat‘[b]othtypesofritualareconcernedwiththesametheme:maleandfemaleunionthroughthecomplementaryrolesofthesexesinsecuringtheimmortalityofthemaleline’.Thisagainshowsthecriticalcontextofthejointfamily.Fruzzetti(1990:123)alsoemphasizeslife-cyclerituals:
Marriageisseenasajourneytoanewlocality,status,role,position,wayofconduct—anewsetofrelationships.Brideandgroomarerebornashusbandandwife…Theriteshighlighttheseveranceofamarriedwomanfromherfather’shouseandthetyingofawife(strī)toanewenvironmentinherinlaws’house.
Whilethisfocusesontheculturalconstructionofthecategoryof‘wife’,Pandey(1969:233)commentedontheexpectedsocialtransformationofthecouple:
(p.284) Thenuptialsintheirutterances,promises,hopesandfearssymbolizeagreatsocialtransitioninthelifeofthebrideandthebridegroom.Theyarenolongerirresponsibleyouthsdependingfortheirbreadandviewsontheirparents.Theseriousnessoflifedawnsuponthem…Thisinvolvesagreatcompromiseandmutualsacrifice…Marriageacquiresitstruemeaningandreachesperfectiononlywhentheconjugalrelationshipisbasedontherealizationthatmarriageisawillingsacrificeforthegoodofthepartner,thefamily,thesocietyandtheworld.
IntheirdiscussionofHindumarriageconcepts,BedwaandUllah(1992:67)notethatobservanceofshastricceremoniesorofcustomaryritesoftheparticularcommunity
![Page 10: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 10 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
bringsaboutavalidmarriage.They,too,commentonthediversityofcustoms,sothat‘itisnotpossibletostatewithcertaintywhatformalitiesarerequiredtobeobserved…Itisindeedaquestionoffacttobeascertainedfromthesocialcontextoftheparticularcommunity’(id.).Theselegalauthorsthenelaborateontherituals,highlightingthatthedharmaśāstras‘haveprescribedelaborateandcomplexceremonies’(id.).Throughagradualprocessofelaboration,Hindusocietyhasdevelopedaplethoraofceremonies.However,asBedwaandUllah(1992:67)assert:
…thereisawideagreementamongtheleadingworkswithregardtotheperformanceofcertainnecessaryceremoniessuchasKanyadan,Panigrahana,SaptapadiandLajhoma.Itisverydifficulttosaywithanydegreeofcertaintywhichoftheseceremoniesoccasionsthecreationofmatrimonialstatus.FromthelegalstandpointitistheceremonyofSaptapadiwhichbringsintoexistencethematrimonialstatus,foritalong[sic]putsthestampoffinalityonthetransaction.CoulditbethensaidthatamarriageisvalidevenifKanyadanandPanigrahanahavenottakenplacesinceSaptapadiisthedecisivefactorregardingthevalidityofamarriage?SuchasituationismostunlikelytoariseforSaptapadiistheculminatingceremony,theKanyadanandPanigrahanabeingthepreliminaryceremonies.ThispositionisstillcontinuingevenafterthepassingoftheHinduMarriageAct,1955.
HereweareenteringtherealmofcurrentlegaldebatesonHindumarriageinthelightofHindutraditions.TheabovequotedemonstrateshoweasilymodernlegalauthorsconflateandconfusetheVedicandshastricingredientsofthetraditionalritualplurality.Intheend,thereaderisleftconfused,asnoclearguidanceisgiven.
DeconstructingModernistMisconceptions
ManyoftheexistingwritingsdonotaddresstheritualorlegaldetailsurroundingHindumarriagesolemnizationandsimplychallengtheinstitutionasawhole.WesawearlierthatThomas(2000:14)takesatotallynegativeviewofmarriage,describingitasaformofsexualslavery:
Itisaninstitutionbymeansofwhichtheownershipofawomanistransferredfromherfatherorguardiantoherhusband.Whiletherightsofaparent(p.285) overhisdaughteris[sic]restrictedatleastbythetaboosofincest,thoseofahusbandoverhiswifewerecompleteandabsolute.Anabjectslavetoherowner,amarriedwomancouldnotpleadlackofvirtueinherhusbandasanexcusefordisloyalty,anymorethanabond-slavecouldwithregardtohisowner…Thesanctityofmatrimonyisthesanctityofsubtletyranny.Perhapstheancientshadgoodgroundsforsanctifyingtyranny….
Thomas(2000:15)continuesthisargumentbysayingthatinmodernconditions,thereoughttobesignificantchanges.Whilesanctifyingtyrannymayhavebeensuitedtoancientsociety,todayweknowbetterformsofgovernmentthanthosefoundedontyrannyand‘itill-behovesustoretainthesanctityofaninstitutionwhichhasitsrootsininiquity’.Whilethislookslikeacaseofthrowingoutthebabywiththebathwater,Thomas(2000:26–7)goesontoblamemarriageceremonies,inparticular,asgivingmentotally
![Page 11: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 11 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
disproportionatepowersandallowingthemtodowithwomenwhattheywant.Atp.27sheargues:
Alltheseundesirableaspectsofmaritalmoralityarebutoffshootsofitsessentialvice,whichistheabsolutepowerthemarriageceremonygivesamanoverawoman.Incertainrespectsthispowerismoredespoticthanthatenjoyedbypoliticaltyrants.Marriagegivesamanpowertocondemnaninnocentwomantoconfinementinacellhecallshishome.Itgiveshimpowertodisrobeawomanwheneverhewantstoandevenagainstherwill.Itgiveshimpowertodemandworkfromherwithoutremuneration.
WhilethisamountstoacallforabandoningHindumarriageritualsaltogether,itisnotexploredwhatwouldorshouldreplacethem.Towhatextentislegalrecognitionbythestate,throughasecularceremonyornoceremonywhatsoever,goingtocircumventtheandrocentricityofsociety?Instead,Thomas(2000:28–9)getscarriedawayintocomparinga‘good’Hinduwifetoadogwhoanticipatesthemaster’swill:‘Andawomanknows,muchbetterthanadog,thatherdailybread,herhappiness,andherhonourdependsuponthecapriceofherhusbandandshetakesinfinitepaintoseethatshegiveshimnocauseforcomplaint’.Thisauthorthereforeconcludesthat‘[o]urmarriagemoralitycanbestbedescribedasaviciouscircleinwhichhusbandandwifechaseeachotherintodisastrousruin’(p.36).Thisishardlyconstructivescholarshiponmarriagelaw.
Suchnegativeconceptionsofmarriageappeartooriginateindeepermodernist(mis)constructionsoftraditionalHindumarriage.Toalargeextentthesehavedevelopedasaresultofthehegemonyofmodernist,positivisticassumptionsabout‘law’,whichdistortourunderstandingofthelegalstatusandroleofmarriageinHindusociety.Nair(1978:11)showshowtheknowledgeofIndianscholarsaboutHindumarriageceremonieshasbeeninfluencedbythemodernlaw,ratherthantraditionalSanskriticscholarship:
TheorthodoxHinduweddingisaceremonialmarriageanditissolemnisedinaccordancewithcustomaryritesandceremoniesoftheparties.Its(p.286)essentialvaliditydependsupon(1)invocationbeforethesacredfireand(2)Saptapadi,wheneverthesetwoformedtheessentialrites.MarriageiscompletedonlywhentheseventhstepistakenifSaptapadiisobserved;tillthenitisimperfectandrevocable.Consummationisnotnecessarytomakeamarriagecompleteandbinding.
ThisisalmostaparaphraseofSection7oftheHMA1955,carefullyphrasedtoavoidpitfalls.Asimilarpassage,butfullofmistakes,isfoundinM.Basu(2001:22),totheeffectthatgenerallyspeaking,‘aHindumarriageissolemnizedwiththecustomaryritesandceremoniespractisedbyboththefamiliesinvolved’.28Basuthencontinuestoemphasizethekeyroleofthesaptapadī,butmakesanothercriticalmistakewhenshewrites,atp.22,that‘[o]neofthemostimportantHindumarriageritualsissaptapadi,i.e.sevenstepstakentogetherbythebrideandthebridegroomaroundthesacredfire.Itisonlyaftertheseventhstepofsaptapadiistaken,thatthemarriageceremonyisconsideredcomplete’.
![Page 12: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 12 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
WhilethisalsoattemptstobeaparaphraseofSection7(2)oftheHMA,theActitselfdoesnotsayorexplicitlyassumethatthesevenstepshavetobetakenaroundthesacredfire,butactuallyusesthewords‘beforethesacredfire’.SinceBasu’sbookisoneofthemostrecentpiecesofwritingonHindumarriagelaw,somewarningaboutthecurrentstateofscholarshipinthisfieldmustbegiven,foreventheplainlegalinformationisnotaccuratelypresented.
Unfortunately,thesituationisalsounsatisfactorywhenitcomestolegaltextbooks.Derrett(1970:xiv)hadarguedthatthelawofmarriagewascentraltolegalregulationandneededtobecarefullystudiedinitsownright.Hewarnedthatdespitethefocusonproperty,thehighlysensitivetopicofmatrimonialstatusmustbetreatedwithacertaindegreeofdiscrimination,isolatedpartlyfromothertopics.Derretthimself(1970:287–301)discussedvariousaspectsofHindumarriageindetail.However,whenweturntoIndianauthorsonthissubject,welocatemorecasesofdeliberateblindness,oratleastagooddealofobfuscation.AleadingauthoronHindulaw,ParasDiwan(1979:78)wroteatthebeginningofachapteronceremoniesofmarriagethat‘[p]erformanceofcertainshastricceremoniesisstillnecessaryforavalidHindumarriage.TheceremonieshavebeenlaiddowninminutedetailsintheGrihyaSutras’.Thenfollowsaratherlong,haphazardsummaryofsomeHinduweddingritualsandotherdetails,untilDiwan(1979:79)comestothesaptapadī:
Thencomesthefourthandthemostimportantandindispensableceremony:thesaptpadi.Nearthevivaha-mandapthebridegroomleadsthebrideforsevenstepsinthenorth-easterndirectionwhilerecitingcertainhymns.Thisisfollowedbyanaddressbythebridegroomtothebride.Wateristhenpouredonthehandsofthecoupleandcertainprayersarerecited.Uponthecompletionoftheprayer,thebridegroomjoinshandswiththe(p.287) brideandsaystoher,“Givethyhearttomyreligiousduties,maythymindfollowmine.Bethouconsentienttomyspeech.MayBrihaspatiunitetheeuntome”.Onthecompletionoftheseventhstepthemarriagebecomesfinalandirrevocable.
Thisidiosyncraticdescriptionandsummaryofthelawconveyswhatasaptapadīritualmightconsistof,butremainsconfusing.Evidently,theauthorcombinedhisownknowledgeandobservationof(Punjabi)Hindumarriageritualswithelementstakenfromrelevantspecialistliterature.Buthavingdeclaredthesaptapadīindispensable,thisparticulardiscussionthenconcludesbystatingthatmostofwhathasbeendescribedwouldnotbeperformedinaHinduweddingtoday.Infact‘[t]heperformanceofalltheaboveceremoniesisalsonotnecessaryforthevalidityofthemarriage’(Diwan1979:80).Whatthenisnecessary?Afewparagraphslater,theauthorreiterates,havinghadabrieflookatSection7oftheHMA:
Thus,theshastricceremoniesandritesarestillnecessary.Thesecanbedispensedwithonlyifoneofthepartiestothemarriagecanestablishacustomaryceremonyinsubstitutionoftheshastricceremony…SaptpadiisabsolutelynecessaryforallHindus.Whethertheotherceremoniesarealsonecessaryforthevalidityofmarriageisnotclear(id.).
![Page 13: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 13 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
Thisconfusingdiscussioncontinuesforanotherfewpages.Althoughthisparticulartextbookhasbeenre-publishedmanytimes,29therelevantpassagesarestillnotadequatelymodifiedandthereaders,mainlylegalpractitioners,arenotgivenclearandunambiguousguidance.Acynicmightthinkoftheprofessionalhabitoflawyerstoavoidclaritytoprotecttheirowninterests.ItisdoubtfulthatProfessorDiwansoughttoupholdHindutraditionassuch,sincehearguedvigorouslyelsewhereforitsabolitionandformodernizing,secularizingreforms.30
Fewlegaltextbooksavoidsuchmischief,whichcouldbeseenasdeliberateabuseofHindumarriagetraditions(Menski2001,Chapter1).However,theapplicationofapresumptionofvalidityofmarriageinaccordancewiththeHinduconceptofsaṃskārahasbeenfoundusefultoupholdthelegalvalidityofHindumarriagesandthefinancialclaimsofmarriedwomen.Forexample,Desai(1993:100–1)states:
Thereisofcourseastrongpresumptioninfavourofthevalidityofamarriageiffromthetimeofsuchmarriagethepartiesarerecognisedbythepeopleconcernedasmanandwifeandsuchpresumptionappliesalsotodetermine(p.288) thequestionwhethertheformalrequisitesofavalidmarriageceremonyweresatisfied.
Inconclusion,itmustbeadmittedthatourknowledgeofthecomplexfieldoftraditionalHindumarriagelawhasremainedpatchyandratherinadequate.Itisevidentthatthishasworkedtothepotentialdetrimentofwomenandchildreninamale-dominatedlegalenvironment,asstereotypesruletheroost,andthediversitieswithinsocialrealityareinadequatelycapturedbytheliterature.InviewofthemalebiasoftheentireHindusocioculturalsystem,itistemptingtosuggestthatreformisteffortsmightbedirectedattheregulationofHindumarriagesbythestate.However,itisevidentthatfortraditionalHindurulers,therewouldbenoperceivedneedforlegalintervention,sincetheareaofmarriagefallssquarelyundertheidealisticself-controlledordermodelofsadācāra.WithintherealmoftraditionalHindulaw,therefore,andalsounderMuslimruleinmedievalIndia,thisparticularareaofthelawremainedremotefromstateintervention.WeneedtodiscussnexttowhatextentthatsituationmayhavechangedundercolonialruleandunderthemodernIndianlegalsystem.
HinduMarriageLawUnderBritishRuleDerrett(1978a:10)reportsthatdharmaśāstrīshadthreatenedpeoplewithhelliftheyinterferedwiththesacredinstitutionofmarriage.PerhapstheBritishweregraduallybecomingawareofthis,buttheyhadtheirownreasonsfornotgettinginvolvedtoodeeplyinHindumarriagelaw.WesawinChapter4thatthegeneralreluctanceofthecolonialrulerstointerfereinthepersonallawspherebecameaprominentpattern.Somewritingonthisperiodsuggeststhatlegalinterventionbythecolonialpowerscouldbringnogoodanyway.Chandra(1998:4)arguesthattheinstitutionalsexismunderlyingtheandrocentricpatternsofVictorianEnglandwastransposed,throughthecolonialclaimtouniversality,ontothecolonialframeworkofBritishIndia.However,asChandra(1998:73)emphasizes,thereweremanylimitstotheprocessofcolonialintervention:
![Page 14: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 14 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
Reflectingtheparadoxicalstructureofthelargerimperialistexercise,acontradictionwasinherentintheBritishIndianjudicialpractice.Drivenbyanexpansionisturgeforunquestionedjurisdictionovertheaffairsoftheruled,itwas,simultaneously,obligedbytheforceofindigenouslawsandusagesintoaself-limitingminimalistconceptionofitsmediation.
Chandraclaimsthatafter1857,aslightshiftoccurred,buteventually‘theexperienceof1857hadintroducedanewstressinthestructuralambivalenceofthecolonialdispensation’(id.).PujariandKaushik(1994,III:283)blametheBritishformaintenanceofthepersonallawsystem,leadingtotheargumentthatthecolonialrulerscouldnotinvolvethemselvesinthecustomsandreligionsoftheirsubjects,whichthenresultedinfurtherstagnation.Takingthefamous(p.289) caseofRukhmabaiasamirrorofsuchtensions,31Chandra(1998:100)arguesthatafterthe1860s,thegradualexperienceofcodificationofthegenerallawemboldenedtheBritishtogofurther:
…massivecodificationofindigenouslawsandusageshadmeanwhileinducedasenseofknowledgeaboutthesubjectpeople,andanattendantsenseofpowerthatcoulddispensewiththeearlierhesitancyanduncertainty.TheBritishwouldnowbethesolearbitersinIndia,evensettlingcasesrelatingtothesubjects’privatelives.Theywouldassumethepowersofthekingandthefunctionsofthecaste…TheywouldnotonlyexercisejurisdictionoverconjugalrightsasdeterminedbyHindulaws,theywouldenforcethoserightsaccordingtotheirownmodesofprocedure.
Theprocessofjudicialintervention,thus,allowedtheBritishtobecomemorecloselyinvolvedwithquestionsofHindumarriageor,tobemoreprecise,itssocialconsequences.Didachildwifewhohadbeenmarriedtoanunsuitable,sickmanhavetoagreetoconsummationofhermarriage?InRukhmabai’scase,itappearedthatthecolonialsystemasserteditselfandintervenedinfavourofthehusband’straditionalrights.However,sincethenegativejudgmentagainstRukhmabaiwasnotenforced,thelawwasdeliberatelyleftwithoutimplementation.Chandra(1998:186)observesthatthecolonialofficials,enjoyingamonopolyofpower,alsoclaimedamonopolyofwisdom.Asbefore,‘[t]heyrationalizedanypositionthathelpedtoensuretheirpowerandsafety.Theyhaddevelopedcoldfeetonthequestionofalteringtheexistinglawforfearofpopulardiscontent’.Thus,therewasnoscopeforlarge-scaleinterventioninHindumarriagelaw,andtheBritishmerelydealtwithafewperipheralmatters,suchasremovingthelegalobstaclestowidowremarriage.32
Agnes(2000:46–52)examinesindetailthesubversionofwomen’srightsundertheBritishthroughtheindirectintroductionofEnglishconceptsandprinciples.Despitetheinitialpolicyofnon-interferenceinpersonallawmatters,sheobservesagradualprocessoftamperingwithestablishedlocalcustomsthroughvariousmeans,prominentlybylaw.Agnes(2000:46)confirmswhatwefoundinChapter4earlier:
Atthisstage,theprocessofevolvinglawsatthelocallevelthroughcommentaries,whichincorporatedwithinthemthelocalcustoms,wasarrested.TheBritishinterpretationsoftheancienttextsbecamebindingandmadethelawcertain,rigid
![Page 15: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 15 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
anduniform.ThisclearmarkerofmodernitywaswelcomedbythenewlyevolvingEnglish-educatedmiddleclassofBengalandprovidedtheBritishamoraljustificationforrulingIndiaas(p.290) harbingersofenlightenment.ThroughtheirinterventionstheHindusocietycouldriditselfofits‘barbarism’andenteraneraof‘civilization’.AnimageofthecruelandsuperstitiousnativeswhoneededChristiansalvationwasdeliberatelyconstructedbytheEvangelists.TheentryofHindusocialreformersintothecampaignagainstSatiattheadventof[the]nineteenthcenturystrengthenedtheprocessofinterventionsnotonlybyjudicialdecisionsbutalsobylegislativereforms.
Agnes(2000:46–7)listsfourlegalareasinwhichsignificantreformswerespearheaded,theSatiRegulationActof1829,33theHinduWidows’RemarriageActof1856,theAgeofConsentAct,1860andtheProhibitionofFemaleInfanticideActof1872.NoneoftheselegislativeinterventionsconcernsHindumarriagesolemnizationdirectly,butallarelinkedtomarriage-relatedarrangementsamongHindusandsoughttoremedyperceivedabusesinsociety.Agnes(2000:47)commentsthattheselaws,focusingon‘barbaric’nativecustoms,createtheimpressionthatinterferenceintherealmof‘personal’lawswasforthebenefitofIndianwomen:‘Thereisapresumptionthatbyincorporatingtheconceptsofmodernityintothenativejurisprudence,thestatusofwomeninIndiawasalleviated.Butrecentscholarshiphasquestionedthispremise’.Agnes(2000:52)goesfurtherinhercriticismofBritishlegalintervention,identifyingtheeffectsofbiasinfavourofhigh-casteHindunormsandmale-centredassumptions:
Theperiodbetween1850and1930witnessedtheeliminationofawiderangeofcustomswhichdivergedfromtheAnglo-Hindulawasthestandardofproofrequiredwasveryhigh.Unlessitcouldbeprovedthatthecustomwasancient,certain,obligatory,reasonableandnotagainstpublicpolicy,ithadaveryslimchanceofsurvival.Derrettcommentsthatinthismanner,theAnglo-HindulawwithitsDharmashastrabackgroundwasspreadmorewidelythanithadeverbeenbefore.TheonlycustomswhichweresavedfromthecrushingeffectsoftheBritishcourtswerethecustomsoftheagriculturalclassesinthePunjabandmatrilinealpracticesoftheMalabarregion.ThetendencyofboththeBritishcourtsandoftheurbanHindumiddleclasswastoignorethediversitiesandtoimposealegalHinduismuponthesecommunities.Contrarytopopularbelief,manyofthecustomswhichwerecrushedwerethoseinfavourofwomen.
However,whilevariousActswerepassedunderBritishrulearoundthe1920s,withsomeregulatingtheconsequencesofmarriageintermsofpropertyrelations,nodirectinterventioninHindumarriageassuchtookplace.FewfurtherreformsthenoccurredinthisfielduntilaftertheSecondWorldWar,duringwhich,asDerrett(1978a:7)observes,socialactivismbegantoflourish:
Ladiesofgoodfamily,andhigheducationalattainments,pressedhardforawholesalereformofthelawofmarriagesincethe1920satthelatest.As(p.291)happenedinbothWorldWarsinEngland,nationalemergenciesplacedwomen’sclaimstoequalityinanewlight.TheleadersofthemovementhadpersonalaccesstoIndianjuristsandpublicmen;whichmeantthatbeforeIndependence,indeedas
![Page 16: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 16 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
earlyas1941,theywereabletoinspirenumerousBillsbeforetheLegislativeCouncil.
KapurandCossman(1996:45)showthatsocialreformersincolonialIndiausedthewomen’squestionforavarietyofpurposes.Somelegalchangesweresoughtfromthecolonialadministrationtoimprovethestatusofwomen,tacklingspecificsocialproblemslikesatiandwidowremarriage,aswellaschildmarriage.ReformsofHindupersonallawwerefirstlookedatduringthe1920sasanaspectofachievingwomen’suplift(KapurandCossman1996:55).By1928thefocuswasbroadenedtoencompassfemaleinheritancerights.Agnes(2000:204)notesthatrightsforHinduwomeninthetraditionalperiodswerebasedontraditionalnotionsofequity,whileduringthecolonialera,theBritishinfluencehadbeennegative.Agnes(2000:205)explainsthat,
…theEnglishcommonlawcontainedseveralstringentanti-womenbiases.ThesebiasescreptintoIndiathroughtheAnglo-Saxonjurisprudenceandsubvertedthetraditionallegalsystemswhichprovidedwomenwithacertainmeasureofeconomicsecurity.Thetraditionalsystemswereremouldedintolinear,formalandstringentstructures,whichexercisedgreaterpatriarchalcontroloverwomenandtheirrighttoproperty.
Agnes(2000:206)arguesthat‘[c]onceptsofjustice,equityandgoodconsciencebecamethedirectchannelsofintroducingEnglishlaws,principlesandpuritanicalnotionsofmoralityintoIndia’.Agnes(2000:205–6)alsoclearlyrecognizesthattheancienttextsweredistortedinthisprocessofcolonialsuperimposition:
ThecolonialinterventionsalsofacilitatedtheconstructionofdistinctandmutuallyhostilereligiouscommunitiesofHindusandMuslims,tobegovernedbytheirrespectivepersonallawsalongthemodelofthecanonlaw.Thebasisofthelegalsystemweretheancientscripturestranslatedwithawesternmindset.Thesescriptureswerenevermeanttobeusedasrigidlegalprinciplesofanadversariallegalsystem.ThetranslatedtextsdrasticallychangedthenatureandcharacterofthecustomaryandscripturalHindulawandtheHinduwoman’srighttopropertysufferedaseveresetback.IntheprocessofstreamliningthepluralisticsocietyseveralcustomaryrightsofwomenwerecrushedastheycouldnotmeetthelegalrequirementsetbytheBritishcourtstoproveacustom.Ironically,inthisprocessthecharacterofthecommunitieswasfixedandthemutuallyexclusivecommunitiesofHindusandMuslimswereconstructedthroughlitigationoverpropertydisputes.
Thecolonialinterventioncouldnot,anddidnot,interfereintraditionalpatternsofHindumarriagesolemnization,whichremainedascomplexand(p.292) custom-dominatedasever.34Anglo-IndiancaselawupheldtheHinduconceptsofsaṃskāra.VenkatacharyuluvRangacharyulu(1891)ILR14Mad316,isacaseonthevalidityofachildmarriage,whichalsoconcernsHinduconceptsofmarriage.Theparentsofayoungbridewererestrainedfromgivingherinmarriagetosomeoneelseanditwasheldatp.318:
TherecanbenodoubtthataHindumarriageisareligiousceremony.Accordingtoallthetexts,itisasamskaramorsacrament,theonlyoneprescribedforawoman
![Page 17: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 17 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
andoneoftheprincipalreligiousritesprescribedforpurificationofthesoul.Itisbindingforlifebecausethemarriageritecompletedbysaptapadiorthewalkingofsevenstepsbeforetheconsecratedfirecreatesareligioustie,andareligioustiewhenoncecreated,cannotbeuntied.Itisnotamerecontractinwhichaconsentingmindisindispensable.Thepersonmarriedmaybeaminororevenofunsoundmind,andyet,ifthemarriageriteisdulysolemnized,thereisavalidmarriage.
Animpressionhasthusbeencreatedthat,inthisareaofthelaw,traditionalHindupractices,evenSanskriticscripturaltraditions,havebeenstrictlymaintainedandpreserved.Exaggeratedassumptionsaboutthefixednatureof‘tradition’inthiscontextabound.BedwaandUllah(1992:68)engageinmythmakingwhentheyclaimthat,eventhoughwedonotknowmuchaboutManuandothersages,
…evenafewdecadesback,theHindusweremainlyandscrupulouslyfollowingtheinjunctionsprescribedbythem.Therewereunbrokentraditionscontinuedfromtheearliesttimeuptothepresentperiod.ThiscontinuityofthetraditionspeaksavolumeabouttheefficacyandtheusefulnessofthesaidinjunctionswhichcouldnototherwisecommandsogreatareverenceandsofaithfulanobservancebytheentireHindusociety.Asamatteroffact,untilthepassingoftheHinduMarriageAct,1955,therewashardlyanymomentouschangeinthelawofHindumarriage.
Theauthorshereconflatecustomarytraditions,textualnormsandlegalrules,overstatingthecontinuityanduniformityoftraditions.Ontheotherhand,mostwritingpayslittleattentionto‘tradition’,commentsstraightontheneedformodernistlegalreforms,ordiscussestheeffectsofthelegalinterventionsbroughtaboutbytheHMAof1955,towhichwemustnowturn.
ModernistReformstoHinduMarriageLawAswesaw,ithasbeenastandardtechniqueinpost-colonialSouthAsiancountriestoreformthemajoritypersonallawfirstandtoignoretheminoritylaws.35(p.293) Theaim,itappears,wasmodernizationaswellasunification,intotalconceptualoppositiontotraditionallegalsystemswiththeiremphasisoncontextspecificityratherthanlegaluniformity.InIndia,thedebatesaboutHindumarriagelawanditsreformshavethereforebeentiedupwithuniformcivilcodedebatesandthepoliticssurroundingtheperceivedintransigenceoftheMuslimpersonallaw.
InmodernIndianlaw,Hindus,Buddhists,Jainas,andSikhswereeventuallytobegovernedbyoneuniformHindulaw,ostensiblyforthesakeofreducingdiversitieswithintheHindupersonallaw,andtopromotenationbuilding.36Inthisway,anartificialunityofHindulawhasbeencreatedtofosteranationalspirit.37Desai(1998:68)claimsthat‘[t]heconditionsandrequirementsofaceremonialHindumarriageareconsiderablysimplifiedandanytwoHindus,whichexpressionincludesnotmerelyHindusbyreligionbutBuddhists,JainsandSikhsaswell,cansolemnizetheceremonialmarriagerecognisedbytheAct’.38Whetherthishasbeensuccessful—inapurportedlyseculardemocracywhichclaimstovalueequidistancefromallreligions—mustbedoubted.SomeSikhs,in
![Page 18: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 18 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
particular,haveviolentlyobjectedtothislegalintervention,demandingamongotherthingsgreaterrecognitionoftheirownpersonallaw.39Eventoday,localandtribalcustomarylawscontinuetoplayamuchlargerroleintheIndianlegalsystemthanmostlawyersreadilyadmit.Customremainsevidentlyrelevantandisatopicdiscussedinallmajortextbooks.40
(p.294) ModernistAgendaandtheirProblemsLegalinterventioninmarriagelawbythepost-colonialIndianstatehasbeenjustifiedinclassiceurocentricmoderniststatements.Qureshi(1978:81)claimsthat‘[t]heroleofsocialengineeringiscompleteinthewestanditshouldbeappliedtoIndia,ifnecessary,inremodelledorrectifiedform’.Qureshi(1978:251–2)explicitlyjustifiessuchinterventioninmarriagelawthroughtheidealizedconceptofthewelfarestate:
Inancientdaystheceremonyofmarriagewasnecessarybecausethestatewasnotexpectedtoseeeveryaspectofhumanlife.Atthattimethemaintaskofthestatewastomaintainlawandorder.Thereasonofprescribingmarriageceremonieswastoimposeamoralbindingonthehusbandtogivesheltertohiswifeandchildren.Today,thestateisawelfarestate.Ithastomakelawsforeveryaspectofhumanlife.Therefore,ifamarriagehasbeenregisteredwiththeRegistrarofMarriages,thereshouldbenoneedofamarriageceremony.
Bystipulatingthata‘religious’marriageceremonymaynotbenecessary,thisauthorapparentlysuggestsasecularizingagenda,aratherradicalstepforaMuslimwriter.41Whilethepreciseextentofstateinvolvementremainsdebated,marriageasamajorbuildingblockofsocietyisnowperceivedtobeofrelevancealsotothestate.Earlier,Altekar(1978:368)hadclearlypleadedforreforms:
…evenorthodoxSmritiwriterslikeManuhaverecognisedthatatimemightcomewhentheirruleswouldbecomeobsolete,andhavethereforedeclaredthatifanyrulesframedbythemarefoundtobenotconducivetothewelfareofsociety,oragainstthespiritoftheage,theyshouldbeunhesitatinglyabrogatedormodified.Asamatteroffacttheythemselveshavedonesoinmanycases.
ModernistlegalauthorssuchasRanbirSingh(1991)claimthatthestateshouldexertevermorecontrolovermarriagelawandmustmakegreatereffortstocontrolthesocialaspectsofmarriage.Singh(1991:39)arguesinparticularthatcompulsoryregistrationofmarriage‘iscertainly[the]needofthehourtoprovethevalidityofaHindumarriage’andclaimsthat‘compulsoryregistrationholdsakeytotheeradicationofsocialmaladieswhichare[a]by-productofdefectivemarriagelaws’(ibid.:40).Assertingthatallkindsofbenefitswillaccruetowomen,SinghevidentlyreliesonargumentsbyProfessorCretneyfromEngland,totheeffectthatregistrationisessentialtoascertainaperson’sstatus.ButisthisequallyrelevantinIndia?Singh(1991:40)claimsthat‘dogmaticinsistenceontheobservanceofessentialceremoniesforthesolemnisationofaHindumarriagehasprovidedafertilegroundforthenurtureofmanysocialevils’.AsdiscussedfurtherinChapter10later,oneofthemodernistkey(p.295) arguments,asinSingh’sessay,isthatformalregistrationofmarriageswouldreducepolygamy.42However,suchclaims
![Page 19: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 19 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
remainhighlydoubtful.Qureshi(1978:251)insistsontheimportanceofmarriageregistration,whilerecognizingthatcustomaryformsofmarriagecannotjustbelegislatedaway:
…itisclearthatinallthereligions,someceremonyhasbeenprescribedforthevalidityofamarriage.Theperformanceoftheceremonyisareligiousmatteranditshouldnotbeabandoned.IfeelthatitshouldbeprovidedintheUniformCivilCodethatnoceremonyisessentialforperformingthemarriage.Everymemberofthesocietyshouldbeallowedtoperformthemarriageinaccordancewithhisconscience.Buttheregistrationofthatmarriagewithin30daysaftertheperformanceoftheceremony,shouldbemademandatory.Ifamarriagehasnotbeenregistered,itshouldnotbetreatedasvalid.However,thecourtsshouldbegiventhediscretiontoacceptanyreasonableexplanationforfailingtogetthemarriageregistered.
Qureshi(1978:251)alsoarguesthattheintentionofthepartiestoamarriageisthemostimportantpointformatrimonialrelations.Ifthespousesarewillingtoliveashusbandandwife,thestateshouldgivefullprotectiontothem.43Moreimportantforthisauthor,though,appearstobetheuniformcivilcodeissue,leadingtoasurrogatedebatewhichisnotreallyconcernedaboutmarriagesolemnization.Qureshi(1978:290)writes:
TherewasatimeinthehistoryofhumancivilizationwhenthedutyoftheStatewasonlymaintenanceoflawandorder,protectionoflife,libertyandthepropertyofthesubjects.Thisconceptofstatehascompletelychanged.Todaywearelivinginawelfarestatewhichhastoguaranteeprosperityandwellbeingofallthepeople.TheIndianConstitution,therefore,containsthechaptersofFundamentalRightsaswellasDirectivePrinciplesofStatePolicy.ThechapterofDirectivePrinciplesofStatePolicyimposesonthestateadutytotakepositiveactionsincertaindirectionsinordertopromotethewelfareofthepeopleandachieveeconomicindependence.Onewayofachievingeconomicindependenceisbyhavinguniformmatrimoniallaws.
Whileonemustquestionthelogicofsucharguments,Qureshi(1978:292)isevenmoreexplicitthattheuniformcivilcodeis‘intendedtogiveequalfacilityoflawtoallsectionsofourpeople’,stipulatingthatallIndiancitizensshouldbegovernedbythesamesetoflaws,since‘[t]herecannotordinarilybeanyjustificationforhavingonesetoflawsforonesectionofthesocietyandadifferentonefortheother’(id.).Thesimplisticargumentpromotedhere,which(p.296) totallyignorestheculturalinputintolegalnorms,istotheeffectthatauniformmatrimoniallawforallIndianswouldconstituteonesteptowardssocialjustice(ibid.:293).Thus,asQureshi(1978:342)arguesfurther,uniformmarriagelawsshouldgiveequalstatustobothspousesirrespectiveofcaste,creed,andreligion,since‘[i]tisthedutyofagoodGovernmenttointroduceagoodsystemoflaws,whichiscertain,simple,lucidanduniformwithoutgivingrisetodisputesorfosteringdisharmonyamongthepeoplethataregovernedbyit’(id.).Qureshi(1978:343)suggestsfinallythatParliamentshouldintroducelawskeepinginviewtherecenttrendsinprivateinternationallawtoestablishuniformityinmarriagelawsallovertheworld.44Thischainofargumentsclearlyarisesfrommodernistthinkingandwishesforagloballystandardized
![Page 20: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 20 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
legalsystem,divorcedfromthesocioculturalneedsoflocalpeopleoutsidetheAnglo-Americanrealm.
Discussingthepracticalmechanicsofmarriageregistration,Singh(1991:51)rightlysuggeststhatthisshouldbelocatedatthevillagelevel:‘Itisnotanaïvesuggestionbecausewhenbirthsanddeathscanberegisteredandaproperrecordcanbekeptforthat,whyshouldmarriagesnotbecompulsorilyregistered,too?’However,contrarytoSingh’sclaims,afull-scalesystemofregistrationforallbirthsanddeathssimplydoesnotexistinIndia(Sarkar1993:1875).Anysystemofregistrationwouldthereforecreateitsownproblemsofunreliability.
PujariandKaushik(1994,III:304)uncriticallyrepeattheassertionthatregistrationofmarriageswouldserveasaneffectivecheckonallkindsofsocialproblemsrelatedtomarriage.45Singh(1989:65)notesthatSection8oftheHMA1955enablesthestategovernmentstoprovideforcompulsoryregistrationofmarriagesbutthatfailuretoregisteramarriagewillnotaffectitsvalidity.Singh(1989:65–6)notesthatregistrationiscompulsoryamongParsisandChristiansandforallmarriagesperformedundertheSMA1954,althoughthatActhashadverylittlesocialimpact,asSingh(1989:66)confirms,arguingthat:‘Theultimateobjectistorecogniseregistrationasthesoleandconclusiveproofofmarriage,irrespectiveofthereligiousritesunderwhichitwassolemnised’.ThisauthoralsoasksthatIndiashouldsignorratifytheUNConventiononConsenttoMarriage,MinimumAgeforMarriage,andRegistrationofMarriageandproclaimsthatitisnecessarytointroduceasystemofcompulsoryregistrationforallmarriages(id.).PujariandKaushik(1994,III:282–3)notethatindependentIndiareliedheavilyonlegislationinitsefforttopromotetotalgenderequality.
(p.297) Stressontheremovalofdiscriminationandspecialprotectivelegislationforwomenwasnecessaryinpost-colonialIndia,becausetheBritishpolicyinthefieldoffamilylawhadsuchacripplingeffectonwomen(Chandra1998).Callsformodernistreformssuggestcapacityonthepartofthemodernstatetocontrolthesphereofmarriagesolemnization.However,ithasremainedacentralcharacteristicofHindulawthattherouteofentryintomarriageforHindus,withveryfewexceptions,goesthroughadherenceto‘traditional’customsandrituals.Inpractice,thesocialprocessofgettingmarriedhasvigorouslyresistedcentralstatecontrol.46
LimitsofStateLawandtheModernistDiscourse
Indeed,carefulscrutinyofthestate’slaw-makingdevicestoreformHindumarriagelawwouldsuggestthatmodernIndianlawinthisfieldsimplyunderwritesHindutradition.Thisiscontrastedbyprevailingmodernistassertionsinthelegalliteraturewhichcontinuetoclaimotherwise.EventodaythelegalcriterionforvalidityofaHindumarriageinIndiaisnotwhetheritwasregisteredinsomeformbythestate,butwhetheritwasperformedinaccordancewithtraditionalritualsandceremonies.Thus,onemustindeedwonderifanyreformshavebeenachievedinthisfieldatall.TherelevantlawinthisfieldisfoundinSection7oftheHMAof1955,whichreadsasfollows:
S.7-CeremoniesforaHindumarriage.
![Page 21: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 21 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
1. (1)AHindumarriagemaybesolemnizedinaccordancewiththecustomaryritesandceremoniesofeitherpartythereto.
2. (2)Wheresuchritesandceremoniesincludethesaptapadi(thatis,thetakingofsevenstepsbythebridegroomandthebridejointlybeforethesacredfire),themarriagebecomescompleteandbindingwhentheseventhstepistaken.
Thismeansthatsubsection(1)hasentirelypreservedtheoldcustomarypositionunderHindulaw,wherebysolemnizationofamarriageisamatterfortherespectivefamiliesconcernedandistobegovernedbyfamily,community,andcastecustom.Aswesaw,thesevarybylocality,casteandfamily,andfromcasetocase,sothatcustomneedstobeinterpretedflexiblyandunduerigidityistobeavoided.
WhenthelegalvalidityofaHindumarriageisatissuebeforeacourt,questionsneedtoberaisedaboutwhatiscustomaryinaparticularkindofmarriage.GiventheflexibleframeworkofSection7(1)oftheHMAascitedabove,severalimportantquestionsmayariseaboutwhenanactionfallsunder(p.298) ‘custom’.Onthedefinitionofcustoms,Section3oftheHMA1955istheguidingprovision:
S.3-Definitions.
InthisAct,unlessthecontextotherwiserequires-
(a)theexpressions“custom”and“usage”signifyanyrulewhich,havingbeencontinuouslyanduniformlyobservedforalongtime,hasobtainedtheforceoflawamongHindusinanylocalarea,tribe,community,grouporfamily;
Providedthattheruleiscertainandnotunreasonableoropposedtopublicpolicy;and
Providedfurtherthatinthecaseofaruleapplicableonlytoafamilyithasnotbeendiscontinuedbythefamily;
OurtraditionalunderstandingofcustominrelationtothenatureofaHindumarriagesuggeststhatlargenumbersofpeoplewouldfollowexactlythesamepatternsofsolemnization,andagroupofpeoplewouldhavedonesoaslongastheycouldremember.However,asindicatedinanearliersectiononthetraditionalHindulawofmarriage,thereissimplynosuchthingasauniformtraditionalHindumarriageceremonythatcouldbehelduptoallHindusasthebindingmodel.AnybodywhodoubtsthisshouldturntoPandey(1969:199),whoclearlyemphasizedthecomplexityoflocalanddifferentscripturaltraditions.Morespecifically,whilediscussingtheVedicmarriagerituals,Pandey(1969:200)admittedthat‘wecannotbecertainastoinwhatordertheyoccurred’.47
Thus,aHindumarriageiscustomaryinthesensethatitconstitutesaspeciallyconstructedsequenceofritualstepsthathaveelementsofcustomarytraditionsinthem.
![Page 22: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 22 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
InessencesuchHindumarriageritualsareadhocsituationspecificreconstructionsofculturalbricksthatarebeingrecycledastheritualsofmarriagesolemnizationproceed.48Viewedinthismanner,everysingleHindumarriagebecomesanentityinitsownright,operativewithintheconceptualframeworkof‘custom’,yetnotrigidlydefinedineveryminutepointofritualdetail.Takingthispluralisticandflexibleviewclasheswiththeformal,morerestrictiveunderstandingsofthelegalconceptof‘custom’,whicharetoorigidandinflexible.
After1955,furtherreformstotheHMAweremadeintheHinduMarriage(Amendment)Act,1956(Act3of1956),theHinduMarriage(Amendment)Act,1964(Act44of1964),andtheMarriageLaws(Amendment)Act,1976(Act68of1976).Noneofthesebroughtanysignificantchangestothelawon(p.299) solemnizationofHindumarriages.Therefore,muchofthelegalliteratureconveysamisleadingpicturewhenitsuggeststhatthemodernHindulawonthesubjectofmarriagehasbeendrasticallychanged.ThiswasneitherthecaseundertheHMA1955itself,norunderitssubsequentamendments.Reddy(1999:13)claimstherewereradicalchangesinthemarriagelawsofHindus,butdoesnotactuallymentionmarriagesolemnizationwhenhewritesthat‘[s]ection5hastheeffectofabolishingtheprohibitiononwidowremarriage,childmarriageandpolygamyinonestroke.Thewomanstandsonthesamefootingasthemaninallthesematters’.49Variar(1985:21)summarizesthepresentpositionintypicaldogmaticlawyers’fashion:
…finallyin1955,theParliamenthasenactedalawcodifyingandamendingthelawofmarriageamongtheHindus.ThereforeatpresenttheentirelawisembodiedintheHinduMarriageActof1955,whichsupersedesthepreviouslawcontainedintheDharmaśastraworks,commentariesanddigests,customs,statutes,anddecisionsofcourts,subjecttotheexceptionsrelatingtocertainaspectsexpresslyrecognisedintheAct.
Thisverygeneralposition,carefullyworded,prevailsataformallevel,whichassumesthesupersessionofHindutradition.ButthisgeneralstatementisclearlywrongasfarasSection7oftheHMAisconcerned.Desai(1998:650–70)claimsthatsubstantialchangeswereintroducedin1955,buttotallyoverstatesthisinpositivistfashion:
TheActabrogatesalltherulesofthelawofmarriagepreviouslyapplicabletoHindus,whetherbyvirtueofanytextorruleofHindulaworanycustomorusagehavingtheforceoflaw,inrespectofallmattersdealtwithintheAct.Italsosupersedesanyotherlaw,containedinanyCentralorStatelegislationinforceimmediatelybeforeitcameintooperationinsofarassuchlegislationisinconsistentwiththeprovisionscontainedinit.
Jain(1983:xxii)notescorrectlythattheHMAdoesnotprescribeanyparticularformofmarriage,butneverthelessclaimsthattheActintroducedradicalchanges,broughtaboutuniformityintheHindulawofmarriage,andabrogatedcustom.Otherauthorsappeartoagree.ForexampleReddy(1999:12)summarizesthepositionaftertheHMA:
TheHinduMarriageAct,1955wasthefirstofthecodifiedHindulaws.TheActdoesnotspecificallyprovideforanyformofmarriage.Itmadethemarriagemoreconsensualandsecularthanreligious.Itnomoreconsidersthemarriageasa
![Page 23: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 23 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
‘Samskara’asconsideredbyDharmaSastras.Themarriageissolemnizedasperthecustomaryceremoniesprevalentinthecommunitytowhichthebrideandbridegroombelong.
(p.300) Infact,asisobviousfromSection7oftheHMAascitedabove,thepost-colonialHindulawonmarriagehassimplyrestatedandconfirmedthedominanceofcustomarylaw,butthisrulenowappearsincodifiedform.BedwaandUllah(1992:68)alsoseemtomakeexaggeratedclaimsabouttheeffectsofmodernistlegalintervention:
TheimmediateeffectoftheHinduMarriageAct,1955,accordingtoconservativeview,hasbeenanabruptseverancefromtheancienttraditionandacceptanceofcertainprinciplesandnations[sic]hithertogenerallyquitealientothegeniusofthepeople.ButatthesametimetheActremoveduncertaintiesinthematterofcertainaspectsofmarriagewhichwereformerlyunderthetraditionallaw…indoubtfulstate.
Butwhathasbeenthisabruptseverancewhenitcomestothelawofmarriage?Again,theexamplesdiscussedconcernformalabolitionofpolygamyandanumberofotherissues,butnotsolemnizationofmarriage.BedwaandUllah(1992:80)write:
Section7(1)oftheActprovidesthataHindumarriageistobesolemnisedbythecustomaryritesandceremoniesoftheparties.Nopreferenceisgiventoanypartywhoseceremoniesaretobeperformed.Ithasbeenlefttotheoptionoftheparties.Astheritesandceremoniestobeobservedarecustomary,theymustpossessthequalitieswhicharenecessaryforthevalidityofacustomasdefinedu/s3(a)whichrequiresthatformaturingintocustomaruleshouldhavebeenobservedforalongtime,continuouslyanduniformly.
Diwan(1978:60)alsosuggestedthattheconceptofHindumarriagehasundergoneatremendouschangeundertheAct,assertingthat‘[t]hedharmicinstitutionofmarriage,inwhichmarriagewasmeanttobeanindissolublereligiousunionofmanandwoman,issoughttobetransformedintoaunionofconvenience’.Diwan(1978:75)claimedthatbyrepudiatingtheinviolableandsacramentalcharacteroftheHindumarriage,theHMA‘treatsmarriageasaconditionalsocio-legalagreementbetweenadultandequalpartieswiththeirfreeconsenttoestablishahomeashusbandandwife’.Qureshi(1978:41)alsoarguesthattheHMAintroducedacontractualelementintoHindumarriage,whichisnowaunionofonemanandonewomantotheexclusionofothers.M.Basu(2001:36)observesthat‘[t]hetraditionalconceptofmarriageisnowgreatlychangedandHindumarriagetodayhasassumedmoreorlessthenatureofacontractforthemutualbenefitofthepartiesconcerned,dulyaidedbydifferentlegalprovisionsandreforms’,althoughsherecognizesthattherearelimitstowhatlawcanachieve.Singh(1993:371)evenclaimsthat‘thesacramentalcharacterofHindumarriagehasevaporatedasaresultofinductionoftheremedyofdivorcebythestatutorylawofHindumarriage’.
Thus,despitetheirinflatedassertionsoftheeffectiveuniformingreformsofstatelaw-making,suchmodernistauthorsareconcedingtheirdissatisfactionwiththeextentofreformstoHindumarriagelaw,whichwasclearlynot(p.301) totallyabolishedorreformed.Diwan(1978:62)complainedthattheHMAwasmerely‘paperlegislationin
![Page 24: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 24 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
severalrespects’andcriticizedthatit‘stillallowscustomarymarriagesandmarriagesrepletewithreligiousceremonies’.Diwan(1978:63)arguedthatalltheseloopholesneededtobeplugged,whiletryingtopronounceontheidealofmodernmarriage:
Thequestionthatoccurstoeveryoneis,whatistheidealformofmarriagethatsuitsthemodernconditions?Marriageceremonyinthepresentsocietymustbeasimpleone,secularorcivil,withoutanypompandshow,anditshouldcombineallthesanctityandsolemnityoftheshastricmarriageandthesecularcontentandmodernityofmarriagebychoice,inwhichthepartiestothemarriageactivelyparticipatewithoutundueinterferencefromelders,whomaybe,atthemost,consultedbeforemarriage.
Diwan(1978:68)wasthereforecriticalofretainingtraditionalHindumarriagesunderthelaw,claimingthat‘theretentionandrecognitionofshastricmarriagesunderthepresentlawofmarriageisaretrogradestep’.ArguingthatthedevelopmentofasecularoutlookshouldbecherishedbythemodernHindulawofmarriage,Diwan(1978:68)suggestedthatthelaw‘shouldbeeitheramendedsuitablysoastobreakthereligiousshellofthemarriageorberemovedcompletelyfromthestatutebook’.
SuchcommentsandsuggestionsreflectthehegemonyofmodernistdiscourseonmodernHindumarriagelaw,continuingtoinflateandextolthepowerandvirtuesofstatelaw-making.Yetdespitetheirlanguageofuniformity,secularism,andvalue-freemodernity,theseareactuallyculture-specificmodernistphrasesinspiredbylegaldevelopmentsinEngland,whereduringthe1970simportantdivorcelawreformswerebeingdebatedinsuchterms.Clearly,amorerealisticperspectiveisneededtocritiquesuchsuggestions.Forexample,howwouldIndiaremovemarriagelawfromthestatutebook?TheHMA1955wasindeedanoddcompromiseoftheoldandthenew,whichinitiallyleftsomelitigantsandjudgesconfused.Interestingly,BedwaandUllah(1992:80–1)observe:
Itissubmittedthatevenafterthecodification,thecourtsarenotstillcertainastowhicharetheessentialceremoniesofmarriage,exceptsayingthat“Saptapadi”isanobligatoryceremony.ItisdenyingthefactthatamongtheHindusthereisnoclarityabouttheessential“sastraicceremonies”.DifferentclassesandcastesofHindusandHindusindifferentpartsofthecountryperformdifferentceremoniesandeventhepriestwhoofficiatesatHindumarriageisunabletoidentifywhataretheessentialceremonies,asdistinctfromthenon-essential.Theresultisthatwhatevertheceremoniesrightorwrongthepriestperforms,areessentialceremoniesforthatmarriage.
Itisthereforeargued,atp.81that‘itisverydoubtfulwhethernonperformanceofessentialceremonieswouldnowhaveafataleffectonmarriage’.Theseauthorsalsorecognizethatlongcohabitationashusbandandwifewouldraiseapresumptionofvalidmarriage.BedwaandUllah(1992:81)thereforealmoststumbleacrossthefindingthat‘thelawrelatingtoaHindu(p.302) marriageisthesameafterthepassageoftheHinduMarriageActasitwasbeforeitspassage’.Thisisindeedthecorrectposition,provided
![Page 25: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 25 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
thatthecourtsarereadytoapplyapresumptionofmarriageasliberallyastheyshould.YetthishascontinuedtobeconstantlycontestedinthecontextofcreatingamodernlegalorderintheIndiancourts.
ContestingModernityintheCourts
ClosercriticalscrutinyofSection3oftheHMAwouldappeartosuggestthatitactuallysupportssuchaflexiblestance.Thesectiondoesnotspeakof‘ancient’customstransmittedandfollowed‘sincetimeimmemorial’,butexplicitlymentionsobservance‘foralongtime’.ProblemshavearisenwhencommunitieshavemoreorlessradicallychangedtheircustomsandhaveintroducednewelementsthatseemtoclashwiththeprovisionsofSection3oftheHMA.Insuchcases,criticalquestionsaroseabouthowlongis‘alongtime’.50Thelegalrequirementismanifestlynotthatsuchcustomshavetobe‘ancient’.Nevertheless,Indiancourtshaveinmanycasesusedpreciselythatword,orhaveevendemandedevidenceofcustoms‘sincetimeimmemorial’,aphrasecomingfromAnglo-Hindulaw.Thisremarkableimprecisioninstatutoryinterpretationshouldnothavegoneunnoticed,buttheHindulawonthissubjectremainsconfusedtoday.
Onefamousearlycaseexemplifyingtheimpositionofsuchmodernist,positivisticconceptionsinHindumarriagelawconcernsthepre-1955caseoftheTamilself-respecters,whorefusedtoinvolveBrahminsandcomplexBrahmanicalritualsintheirmarriageceremoniesanddevisedinsteadnew,simpler,andcheapercustomaryformsofmarriagesolemnization,whichwerefollowedbyalargenumberofpeople.InDeivainiAchivChitambaramChettiarAIR1954Mad657,itwasheldbytheMadrasHC,inconflictwithlocalsocialnorms,thatasimplemarriagesolemnizationwithoutfullritualsdidnotleadtoalegallyvalidHindumarriage.Inotherwords,afull-fledgedshastricmarriageceremonywasheldtobeessentialforlegalvalidity.Denyingthescopeforthedevelopmentofnewcustomsandoperatinginfavourofhigh-casteshastricnorms,thisdecisioncreatedagravesocialproblem,foritlegallyinvalidatedthousandsofHindumarriagesandconfusedpeopleabouttheirpropertyrightsandstandinginsociety.Remarkably,ittookthelegislatureofTamilNaduagoodthirteenyearstocomeroundtoresolvingthisconflict.Nevertheless,theresultinglegislativeamendmentconstitutesasignificantvictoryforcustomarylaw.51
(p.303) LatercasesonSection7oftheHMA,startingfromthewell-knownprecedentofBhauraoShankarAIR1965SC1564,havetendedtousetheconceptof‘ancient’customanddemandshastricrituals,especiallythesaptapadī.Theinsistenceoncustomhavingtobetraced‘fromtimeimmemorial’isdefinitelyarelicofBritishlegaleducation,sinceintraditionalHindulawtherewasnosuchrequirement.RabindraNathDuttavTheStateAIR1969Cal55takesrathertoostrictaviewofcustomsinHindumarriages,virtuallyrulingoutthatanychangesmaybeintroduced.Inthiscase,Hindumarriageistreatedasasacramentanditwasheld,atp.58:
TheHinduMarriageActdoesnotlaydownanyspecialorparticularkindorformofceremoniestobecompulsorilyobservedinallHindumarriages.Infact,theformofmarriage,prescribedbytheSastras,issubjecttomodificationsbycustomor
![Page 26: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 26 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
usage.Buttheexpression‘CustomaryCeremonies’cannotbetakentomeanthat‘SastricCeremonies’havebeentotallyignored.Theexpression‘CustomaryRitesandCeremonies.naturallymeanssuchsastricceremonies,whichthecasteorcommunitytowhichthepartybelongsiscustomarilyfollowing.CustomaryritesandceremoniestobeacceptedmustbeshownthatsuchcustomasanessenceofmarriageceremonyhadbeenfolloweddefinitelyfromancienttimesandthatthemembersoftheCaste,CommunityorSub-Castehadrecognisedsuchceremoniesasobligatory.Onceitisprovedbyevidencewhatceremonieshadbeenfollowedascustomaryrites,itisnolongerlefttothewilloftheCaste,CommunityorSub-Castetoalterthemastheessenceofcustomisthatonaccountofitsdefinitenessithadbeenrecognisedandadoptedbythecasteorcommunitywithcertaintyandwithoutanyvariation.
Thisisclearlyastrictlegalisticapproachthatisnotgoingtobefeasibleinpractice.GiventhattheinherentcustomaryflexibilityofHindumarriageritualscausedlegalproblemsinsomecases,somewritersbegantocriticizethestricturesofmodernist,positivisticmodels.Anand(1992:184),forexample,whilenotconsciouslycouchinghisanalysisinthistheoreticalframework,observesthattheofficialstrictnessofproofofmarriageshouldberelaxedinviewofsocialchangesandnewpatternsofrituals:
Meanwhileceremoniestoamarriagebesimplifiedsoastoincludetheintentionofthepartiesmanifestedbyexchangeofgarlandsorringsorthelikesinthepresenceofrelativesandfriends.Suchsimpleformsberecognisedasvalidmarriagestatutorily.Afterall,manyritualsandceremoniesinconnectionwithmarriagearealreadynotinvogueanymore.PanditjiisgenerallybribedtoskipmantrasattheSaptapadiandtohurrythewholeshow.Shouldnotlawkeeppacewithsociety?Shouldthelawnotrecognisethoseceremonieswhichsocietyhasevolvedtograntapprovaltoamarriage?
Thisinterestingsuggestionmeansineffectthatthelawshouldrecognizewhatsocietydoes,ratherthanseekingtodictatetopeoplefromabove.Isthisaconsciousswitchawayfromthecolonialmodeofthesocialreformers,oreven(p.304) anearlyglimpseoftheemergenceofapostmoderncondition?OtherdebatesthatreflectuponthecontestationofmodernistconceptionswithinthecourtsrelatetotheissueofprohibitedrelationshipsforHinduspousesinSection5oftheHMA.Herethelegalneedwastoprotectcertainlocalcustoms,especiallyfromsouthIndia.InviewofthesizeofIndia,andthevarietyofcustomsaboutprohibiteddegrees,auniformlegalregulationcouldsimplynotbeachieved.Similarly,clauses(iv)and(v)ofSection5oftheHMAmakeanexceptioninfavourofacustomorusagegoverningeachofthepartiestothemarriagewhenitcomestoprohibiteddegrees.SomereportedcasesfromtheSouthareveryinstructiveonthissubject.InBalusamivBalakrishnaAIR1957Mad97,amarriagebetweenagrandfatherandhisdaughter’sdaughtercameupforconsideration.TheCourtheldthismarriagetobevoid.InMeenakshisundaramPillaivP.NammalwarAIR1970Mad402,amanhadmarriedhissister’sdaughterafterhisfirstmarriageremainedwithoutoffspring.Itwasheld,atp.405:
Thesaidmarriagehavingtakenplace,aftersuchmarriageshavebeenprohibited
![Page 27: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 27 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
bylaw,itwouldbeinvalidandthepositionofhiswifewhoisalsohisnieceisnobetterthanthatofaconcubine.Buthetookhissister’sdaughterinmarriageashissecondwife,ashehadnoissuesbyhisfirstwife.SuchamarriagewasnotprohibitedbySastras,orHinduLaw,asadministeredpriortotheprohibitionofsuchmarriagesbystatutes.
ThiswasacaseabouttheHindulawofcharitableendowment,andthemarriageissuewasonlyaminorpoint.Itissignificantthatnobodyaskedwhethermaybe,inthiscommunity,marryinganiecewaswithinthescopeofcustomarylaws.Itiscertainlynottheuniversallyacceptedposition,asBedwaandUllah(1992:72)seemtosuggest,thatallsuchmarriagesarenecessarilyvoid.Infacttheseauthorsthemselvesprovidefurthercasereferences(ibid.:72–3)totheeffectthatawoman’smarriagewithhermaternalunclemaybeconsidereddesirableinsomecommunities,butnotinothers.52BedwaandUllah(1992:73)addatouchoflegalrealismwhentheysuggestthatnotmuchharmisdoneifpeoplegoonsolemnizingsuchmarriagessince,‘ifthefamiliesarewelleducatedandfinanciallysound,itwouldmakenodifferencetothemiftheymarrybybreakingtheprovisionsofthestatutorylaws.Theiractionwouldnotbringanysocialstigmainthesocietytothemandtheirchildren’.
Predictably,animportantaspectofwritingonHindumarriageconcernsthepositionofwomen.Singh(1989:157)arguesthatthereformativeeffortsofthe1950sendedupbeingreducedto‘atenuousandemaciatedbodyfragmentedintomanylaws’andthusthroughoutthe1950s,malehegemonycontinuedtorule.Manyauthorscomplainthatmodernistlegislationwasnotradicalenoughandhasnotimprovedthelotofwomen.Singh(1980:85)makes(p.305) referencetoChinesefamilylawreforms,arguingthattheresulthasnotbeenacopyingofmodernWesternlovemarriage,buta‘situationwhereyoungcouplesagreetomarriageonthebasisofbothtraditionalandmodernChinesevalues,keepinginmindtheirparents’preferencesandadvice’.ForIndia,Singh(1989:161)evenasksforadegenderizedsocietyand,inastylereminiscentofMartinLutherKing,InduPrakashSingh(1990:xiv)imaginesherownidealsocietyofthefuture:
Ienvisagetheendofalloppressionofwomenandexploitationinadepatriarchisedsocialistdemocraticsociety.Letusjoinhandsinbuildingsuchanegalitariansocietywherewewouldnotbehavingwomenandmen(gendertypes)buthumans.
Morerealisticandacademicallycogent,Agnes(2000:77)speaksofstiltedeffortsatgenderjusticeinthepost-independenceperiod,findingthat:
…theunderlyingmotiveofthereformwasconsolidatingthepowersofthestateandbuildinganintegratednation.Thiscrucialobjectivecouldbeachievedonlybydilutingwomen’srightstoarriveatalevelofminimumconsensussothattheagendaofreformcouldbeeffectedwithoutmuchopposition.Severalcustomaryrightsweresacrificedtoarriveatuniformity.ThestatutesthatwerefinallyenactedweremerelyornamentalinsteadofbeingmarkersofgenuineandconcreteeffortsatrectifyingthegenderdiscriminationwrittenintotheHindulaw.
Thefactthatusingtheofficialmechanismsofthestatelawmayevenbe
![Page 28: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 28 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
counterproductiveisevidentfromSanjayMishravEvelineJobeAIR1993MP54.ThiscaseconcernsaHindumanandanIndianChristianwomanwhoallegedlymarried,butthe‘husband’refusedtoacknowledgethatalawfulmarriagehadtakenplace.ThewomanhaddistributedcopiesofamarriageregistrationdocumentundertheSMA1954toherfriends,whilethemanadmittedtohavingsignedcertainmarriageregistrationdocumentsinaRegistrar’soffice,butclaimedthatthishadhappenedunderduress.Thewomanallegedfurtherthattheyweremarriedin1985inafamousHindutempleinCalcutta,inaccordancewithHinducustomsandrites,andhadthereafterlivedashusbandandwife.ThejudgefoundthatundertheprovisionsoftheHMA,aHindumanandaChristianwomancouldnotvalidlymarry,thusthe‘wife’s’claimtohavefollowedHinducustomaryritualsofmarriagecouldnotbemaintained.Thelowercourtwascriticizedforoverlookingthedetailsregardingthepersonallawoftheparties:
Thetrialcourthasmerelygonebytheregistrationcertificate;butsuchregistrationisvalidonlywhenitisfoundthatthereisavalidmarriage.Wherethefactumitselfisdisputed,essentialceremonyconstitutingthemarriageintheinstantcaseinaccordancewithHinduritesmustbepleadedandprovedandtheperformanceofsuchritesmustbebroughtonrecords(p.58).
(p.306) WhileitwasquiteinappropriatetopresumeinthepresentcasethatasaptapadīritualwouldbeanessentialelementofthisHindumarriage,53thedecisionreachedbythecourtseemscorrect.Theregistrationdocumentbyitselfisnotsufficientconclusiveproofinlawthattherewasaproperlysolemnizedmarriagebetweentheparties.Thehusband’sappealwasthereforeallowed,andhemanagedtoextricatehimselffromhisunwantedlover.ThiscasewouldappeartoconfirmthatifwomenwanttosecuretheirlegalpositionasaHindu‘wife’,theywouldhavetoensurethattheyfollowthecustomaryHindulawonmarriagesolemnization.54Formalrecoursetothesecularstatelawonitsown,asthiscaseshows,isinsufficient.
Thus,despitetheprevalenceofmodernist,positivisticconceptions,modernIndianstatelawhasnotasserteditselfthroughabrogationofthetraditionalHindulawonmarriagesolemnization.Derrett(1963c:137–8)summarizedthelegalpositionsuccinctly,sayingthat‘[t]hesastricconceptofmarriageasasamskara(‘sacrament’),aunionoftwopersonsforallpurposes,spiritualandsecular,indissolubleevenbydeath,hasbeentrimmedbutnotdestroyedbylegislation’.Thispointstothefactthatthemodernistreformsofthe1950swerenotjustanawkward,haphazardcompromise.Asamethodoflegalregulation,thelegislativenon-interventioninHindumarriagesolemnizationreflectsarecognitionthatlawcannotjustbeimposedbythestate.Inthissense,thepost-colonialmodernistlawmakersalreadyimplantedtheseedsofapostmodernconditionintotheregulatorysystemwhichtheycreatedduringthe1950s.
PostmodernEvolutionofHinduMarriageLawTheimplantationofthesepostmodernseeds,combinedwithagrowingrealizationthatmodernistlegalreformsinpost-colonialIndiawerenotquitewhattheyclaimedtobe,laidthefoundationsforthepostmodernevolutionofHindumarriagelawduringthepastfewdecades.Goingbeyondamerecritiqueofmodernityanditselements,postmodernist
![Page 29: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 29 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
approaches—bothinscholarshipandinthelegaldomainofcasesandlegislation—havesearchedmorecriticallyforappropriatesolutions,whilerecognizingthatnoperfectsimpleremedymaybefoundtogoverncomplexsituations.
WithspecificreferencetoHindumarriagelaw,therealizationthatHindumarriage,asacentralelementofsociety,cannotbesubjectedtolegislativeintervention,formsamajorelementofHindulaw’scurrentpostmoderncondition.Thisrealizationhasledtolegislativeinaction,aformofnihilisticrefusalbythestatelawtogetinvolvedinregulationofHindumarriages.Itseemstohavebeenrealizedmorerecentlythatthereformistambitionsweretoograndandthemodernisttaskisjusttooenormous.Oneindicationofthisisthat(p.307) successiveParliamentshavebeenunwillingtoturnanumberofstatutoryproposalsbywomen’sgroups,inparticular,intoformallegislation.
ThesamescenariomotivatestheIndianjudiciarytodevoteexplicitrecognitiontotraditionalHinduvaluesrelatedtomarriage(whichmaybeexpressedinsecularlanguageabouttheneedforastablesociety),aprocesswhichhasimplicationsbeyondthenarrowrealmofHindumarriagelaw.ThepracticalendresultisthattherulesandconceptsoftraditionalHindulawhavebeengrantedanewleaseoflife.55Theynowappearwithintheformalframeworkof‘modern’Hindulaw,underminingthismodernity,asitwere,byexertingtraditionalsocioculturalandlegalinfluencethroughtheformalmechanismsofmodernIndianlaw.ThetraditionalHindulawofmarriagesolemnizationhassteadfastlyresistedmodernistattemptsatitsabrogation.
Derrettpredicted,throughouthislaterwritings,56thatdespitesomeevidenceofmodernization,thedominantviewinHindusocietyfortheforeseeablefuturewouldremainthatmarriageisaformofsocialobligation.Mitter(1992:20)notesthat,‘nothing,apparently,canbeworseforawomanthantoremainunattached,asocialpariah.InalltheseparateandunequalsocialworldscohabitinginanIndiancity,thereisconsensusononepoint:awomanneedstohavemarriedstatus.Attheleast,sheneedstohavehadahusband,once’.However,Nair(1978:v)observessignificantsocialchange,notingthat‘[m]arriageisperhapstheonlyinstitutionwhichhasundergonearapidchange’andevensuggeststhat‘present-daymarriagepracticesleadonetobelievethattheinstitutionisbecominganunwelcomeaffair’.YetthisdoesnotamounttosuggestingthattheabolitionofmarriageisviableinIndiansociety;itreflectsatbestthepossibilityofanindividual,privatechoice,whichwas,afterall,familiartoancientHindutradition,too.57
TowardsaPostmodernDiscourse
InthisregarditisinstructivetorefertotheDowryProhibitionActof1961,whichiswidelyseenasanexampleofthefutileattemptsbythestatelawtoabolishsocio-legalpracticesinIndiansociety.58Jain(1990:625–6)arguesthat(p.308) ‘[i]tremainsverydoubtfulwhethersomeofthebadsocialpracticeswhichareingraineddeeplyinthesocialpsychecanbeabolishedmerelybylegislation’.Disgustedwiththehorriblestalemateoverthousandsofdowrydeathseveryyear,somewomenactivistsbegantocallforamoralreappraisal(Kishwar1990).Yet,doesthismeanthatthewheelofhistoryshouldinfactbeturnedbacktoAśoka’sidealism?Postmodernistanalysisrecognizes(albeitwith
![Page 30: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 30 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
somereluctance)thattheoldHinduconceptsof‘examiningone’sconscience’(ātmanastuṣṭi)and‘modelbehaviour’(sadācāra)retaintheirrelevancetoday.Whilesomemodernistcommentatorshavetremendousdifficultieswiththiskindofapproach,itcannotbejustdismissedoutofhand.WhileitclearlyremainspoliticallyincorrectandambivalenttohighlighttheoperationoftraditionalHinduconceptsinmodernIndia,globalcomparativejurisprudentialtheorysuggeststhatalllegalsystemscontinuouslyfeedontheirparticular,culture-specific‘legalpostulates’(Chiba1986;Menski2000a).So,whatiswrongwithIndiarelyingonHinduconceptstoreconstructitslegalsystem?
ModernistanalysissimplypresumedthatanyelementsortracesofHindulawbelongtomedievaltimes.59WarningsfromProfessorDerrettandafewothersthatmodernizinglegalreformscouldgotoofarandwouldendupproducinginjusticeinthenameofthelaw,werenottakenseriouslyforalongtime.WhilesuchargumentsaremoredirectlyrelevantforHindudivorcelaw,problemshavearisennotonlyatthesubstantiveleveloflegalrules,butalsoclearlyinthesphereoflegaltheory.Isstatelawreallyabletodictatetosocietyandalleviatesocialproblemsintheprocess?60
However,somerecognitionofthelimitsofmodernityisnowprovidedbymodernistwriterssuchasAgnes(2000:90),whoarguesthatthenewrightsgiventowomeninthe1950s‘aremoreconceptualthanactual.Whileattemptingtoresolvesomeissues,thecodificationhasforegroundedotherswhichhaveyettofindasatisfactorysolution’.Agnes(2000:211)notesfurtherthatthefamilylawdebatesareonlyconvenientlybroughtintothepublicarena‘insupportofotherhiddenpoliticalobjectives’.Whileearliertheuniformcivil(p.309) codeandincreasedpropertyrightsforwomenwerefocalpointsfordebate,Agnes(2000:177)confirmsthatwomen’sgroupsandfeministactivismarenowconcentratingonlegalissuesaroundviolenceagainstwomen.Theliteraturereflectsagrowingrealizationthat,justasthecolonialinterventionactuallydisadvantagedwomenfurther,asitimportedandrocentricWesternnotionswhichdamagedSouthAsianwomen(Chandra1998),post-colonialmodernistreformswerenotabletogetridofthepatriarchalframeworkofreferenceeither.Inherconcludingdiscussion,Agnes(2000:203)observes:
Whileexaminingtheevolutionoffamilylawssituatedwithinapatriarchalsocialstructure,discriminationagainstwomenisaforegoneconclusion.Caste,classandclanpuritiesaremaintainedthroughastrictsexualcontrol.Punitivedeterrentmeasuresanddenialofeconomicrightsarethemeansthroughwhichthiscontrolisexercised.
Agnes(id.)alsoarguesthatthehistoryofwomen’srightsisnotlinear,withreligiousandcustomarylawsatoneextremeendofthescale,andstatutoryreformsslowlyprogressingtowardstheotherend,asispopularlybelieved:‘Thehistoryiscomplexwithvariousinteractiveforcesconstantlyatplay…ithasbeenacaseof“gainsome,losesome”’(id.).Takingadifferentapproach,butthinkingalongsimilarlines,Parashar(1992:113)assertsthattheIndianlawreformerswerenotactuallyaimingtofundamentallyredefinetherolesofwomen.Sheobservesthat,inthe1950s,therewasnoradicalbreakwithHindutraditionallaw.TheMarriageandDivorceBillpreparedbythefirstHinduLaw
![Page 31: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 31 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
Committeewasostensiblydesignedtoincorporatethe‘bestpartsofthecodeofManuratherthanthosewhichfallshortofthebest’(id.).Inotherwords,therewasnorealmodernistlegalrevolution,butratheraslighttinkeringofHindulawattheedges,whichiscertainlythecaseinHindumarriagelaw.
Feministshaveoftenhighlightedthatsomeinstitutionswhichareconsiderednecessaryarenotinfacttestedassuch(Singh1989:23).Theythusengageintalkofcounter-institutionsandtheobliterationofpatriarchalinstitutionslikefamily,marriage,andthelegalsystem,aimingforanoverthrowofthepatriarchizedsocietyintoto.Yetdissentingvoices,suchasSingh(1989:31),arguethatrevolutionaloneisnotenough,asshowninthesocialistcountries:‘Whatmoreisneededisaconscientizingrevolution—aphenomenologicalreality—whichwouldnotonlyemancipatewomenbutalsomen’.Derrett(1978a)emphasizedthatpointalongtimeago.Thechallengeishugeandlargelybeyondtheambitofthestatelaw.
Fromtheangleofconstitutionallaw,ithasbeenevidentforsometimethattheprojectofmodernlawreformsinIndiacouldnotmeaningfullyguaranteeandoffertothecitizenstheidealsthatthelawpromised.Minattur(1980:165)highlightedthatunderArticle15(3)oftheConstitution,nothingshallpreventthestatefrommakinganyspecialprovisionforwomenandchildren.Sotherewasanexplicitprovisionpermittingthestatetodiscriminateinfavourofwomen,ifsuchdiscriminationwasfoundnecessary.Minattur(1980:166)notedthat‘anumberoflawswereadoptedwithaviewtoensuringequality0fstatus(p.310) andopportunityforwomen’,whileinpractice,equalitycontinuestoeludewomen.Minattur(1980:178)concluded:
…itisclearthatsomethingmorethanlegislationisrequired.Perhapsthefirstthingtobeattemptedistomakewomenawareoftheirrights,howeverthisisdone.Itisalsonecessarytochangetheattitudesofbothmenandwomen,ofsocietyingeneral,tosocialobjectivessoughttobeachievedbylegislation.Aradicalchangeintheattitudesofwomeninducedbyanawarenessoftheirrightswhichareconstitutionallyguaranteedandlegallyprotectedwillbethefirststepinthecomplexprocessoftransformingthesocialstructuresothatwomenmayenjoyfullequalitywithmenineverysphereoflife.
Agnes(2000:206)alsoobservesthattheConstitutionwithitsmandateofequalitybroughtinvisionsofgenderjustice:
Restructuringofthefeudalfamilylawstosuittheneedsofwomenwithinamoderndemocracywasthechallengebeforethenewlyindependentstate.Butthemuch-trumpetedHindulawreformsofthepost-independenceperiodwereconcernedmorewithhomogenizingtheculturallydiverseHinducommunitythroughauniformsetofstateregulatedenactmentsthanwideningthescopeofwomen’srights.Hencecrucialwomen’srightslocatedwithincustomarylawswerecompromised.TheenactmentsturnedouttobeacuriousmixtureoftheEnglishlawandtheshastriclawwiththeworstbiasesofbothwrittenintothem.
Inviewofsuchshortcomingsofthemodernistlawreformproject,manymodernistshave
![Page 32: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 32 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
developedcoldfeet.WesawintheprevioussectioninthischapterhowQureshi(1978)arguedvigorouslyinfavourofsignificantstateinterventioninmarriagelaw.Inhisconclusions,Qureshi(1978:371–2)takesuptheissueofmarriageregistrationagain,butthisarticulateMuslimauthorisnowback-pedallingonhisearlierreformistzeal,advancingreligiousarguments:
Asregardstheessentialceremonies,thereisasimilaritybetweenallthelaws.Itissubmittedthatthisispurelyareligiousmatterandthestatecannotinterfere…Completede-emotionalisationinmarriageisnotahealthypracticeandismostunsuitabletoIndianswhoarevibrantwithemotiontemperamentally.MerelysigningthemarriageagreementwillnotsatisfythepsychologyofIndians.Therefore,allcitizensshouldbeallowedtomarryaccordingtotheirownceremonies.However,thesemarriagesshouldbegotregistered.Themethodofregistrationshouldbe30daysfromthedateofmarriage.
EvidenceoftheactualextentofmarriageregistrationinIndiacontradictsloudmodernistassertionsthatstatecontrolwouldbeaviablemethodofregulatingHindumarriagelaw.PujariandKaushik(1994,III:305)reportstatisticsofmarriageregistrationundertheSMA1954fortheperiod1968–72.61InBombay,(p.311) 601marriagesin1968and816in1972wereregisteredinthismanner,nomorethanthirteenperyearinRajasthan,andnoteven250inDelhi.ThefiguresforregistrationofmarriagessolemnizedunderotherlawsbutregisteredundertheSMAaremuchlower,withnomorethanforty-threemarriagesin1970forBombayasthemaximum.62
Whilereformersandmodernistacademiccommentatorsstillpushforcompulsoryregistrationofmarriages,itisquiteevidentthatIndiansarenotreadytoacceptsuchaformal,bureaucraticregime.63Apostmodernanalysiswouldsuggestthat,inactualfact,nolegalsystemintheworldachievesabsolutecertaintyofmaritalstatus.64Basu(2001:36),whoseargumentsformodernreformswerecitedabove,alsoadmitsthattherearelimitstowhatlawcanachieve:
Attemptstobringaboutchangesinthestatusofwomaneitherthroughlegislationorjudicialactivismcanachievelittlesuccesswithoutasimultaneousmovementtotransformthesocialandeconomicstructuresandtheculture(values,ideologiesandattitudes)ofsociety.
Iyer(1993:1)similarlyemphasizesthatsocialjusticeinIndiameansalsogenderjustice,butnotesthatnoquantumleapshavebeenmadeandthatthisisnotjustanIndianproblem,sincetheUSAhas‘failedtoratifyintoitsconstitutionequalityofthesexes’(ibid.:2).Muchdependsonprivateandindividualinitiative,butthereisalsoaroleforthestateinpromotinggenderjustice.Iyer(1993:16)advisesinthisrespectthatIndianwomenmustdemandmoreeconomicandsocialdignityinpracticalterms.Healsosuggeststhattheprivatesector,likethepublicsector,shallbeboundtorespectequalityofsexes‘onpainofthestatewithdrawingalllicences,loansandotherfacilities.TheStateshall,throughallitsprocesses,compeltheprivatesectortocomplywiththedemandsofgenderjustice’.Theseareagainmuchwideragendathathavelostsightofmarriagelawasakeyissue.
![Page 33: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 33 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
Inanearlymixtureofmodernistandpostmodernanalysis,Derrett(1978a:159)notedthattheIndianjudgeseventuallyunderwroteHindumarriageasasacramentbutwereinitiallyunsure:
Judges,confusedbytheinitialerrorofcommentatorswhoneglectedthegreatshiftinallegiancewhichoccurredintheéliteduringthosevitalyears,(p.312) andobliviousofthequaintnessofasinglemarriagelawbeingappliedtoallHindusindiscriminately,havecomeout,almostintuitively,withthesuggestionorratherapprehensionthatmarriageisstillasamskara,asforthevastmajorityitis.
Derrett(id.)alsoobservesthat‘thisisunderstandablylessevidentinrecentyears’,whichonemaytakeasareferencetothegrowingstrengthofmodernistnotions.However,theideathatmarriagemustbeupheld,notforthesakeofHindutradition,butforthegoodofsocietyandtheprotectionofwomenthemselves,alsocomesthrough,atp.163.WhiletheEnglishcourtswerenotinterestedinreconciliation,Derrett(1978a:197)stressesthatIndianHindulawdidretainthejudicialdutytocheckwhetheramarriagecouldstillberescued.Thissubjectbelongsmoreproperlyintoadiscussionondivorce,butthelinksbetweenmarriageanddivorcelawdonotpermitwatertightsegregation.Howastatelegalsystemwillhandleoneoftheseareasofthelawwillinevitablyinfluencetheother.
AnotherexampleoflinksbetweendifferentareasoflawhasbeenidentifiedbyAgnes(2000:180),whochallengesthemodernistassumptionthatcompulsoryregistrationofHindumarriageswillautomaticallybebeneficial,pointingtoacrucialconfusion:
Iftherightsofcohabiteesareonparwiththerightsofspousesthenregistrationservesnopurposeatallandtherewouldbenocompulsiontoregisteramarriageinasocietywheremarriagesareviewedmoreassocialfunctionsthanaslegalcontracts.Alsoifmarriagesandinformalcohabitationsaregrantedsimilarweightageandaredeemedasoffencesthenthewholepremiseuponwhichconvictionforbigamyisbasedcollapses.Heretheexistinglawmakesacleardistinctionbetweensolemnmarriagesandillegitimateandinformalallianceswheretheceremonyofsolemnizationandpermanencyoftherelationshipisofgreatestrelevance.Thewideningofthescopewouldrenderadulteryanoffenceratherthanbigamy.Butinthesamestroke,itisrecommendedthatadulteryoughtnottobedeemedasanoffence.Sothereisanambiguityaboutwhetherthefocusofthereformiscurbingsexualimmoralitybyapenalprovisionorprotectingwomen’seconomicrightsthroughwideningthescopeofmaintenancetoincludewomenininformalalliances.
Agnes(2000:183)observesthatmanycountriesinSouthAsiastipulatecompulsoryregistration,butnocountryhasextendedthissofarastoinvalidateanexistingmarriage,withadverseimplicationsforwomenandchildren.65She(p.313) notesthat,‘[i]nfact,themoderntrendistowardsgrantingrightsandbenefitstopeopleininformalrelationships’(id.),whileinIndiatheofficialtrendisstilltiltingtowardsgreaterregimentationinfamilyrelationships.However,shefailstoidentifythatsomethingmust
![Page 34: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 34 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
thereforebewrongwithmodernistIndianscholarshiponfamilylawreforms.
Infact,inmovingtowardsapostmoderndiscourse,Agnes(2000:176ff.)hasdiligentlypreparedthegroundforacriticalanalysisofIndianfamilylawbyproducingadetailedmodernistdiscussionofanumberofMarriageBillsformulatedbylegalscholars,women’sorganizations,andotherbodies.66Herstatedaimistotestthesevariousreformsuggestionsfortheirmodernity.Inturn,sheconcludesthattheexistingsuggestionsdonotgofarenoughand,aboveall,donotconsidersufficientlywelltheeconomicneedsandentitlementsofwomen.
Agnesthusfindsthatinthehighlypoliticizedclimateofmodernistlawreformdebate,rhetoricdominatesoveraclearunderstandingofpolicyandasenseofrealism.ThedominantagendaoftheuniformcivilcodehavegivendisproportionateattentiontoMuslimlaw,communalizingandtherebyblockinganyprogressivedebates.Agnes(2000:209)ishighlycriticalofthelegalreformproposalsofvariousbodies.Inherview,suggestionsforreforminfamilylawswhichsetouttoredefinegenderrelationswithinmarriageandthefamily,wouldhavetotakeintoconsiderationvarioussocial,political,legal,andeconomicrealities.But,assherightlyclaims(id.),‘thedraftsfortheenactmentofaUniformCivilCodeframedbythelegalacademia,donotseemtohavecontextualizedwomen’srightswithinthesediversecomplexities.ThemodelforreformistheHinduMarriageActwhichinturnisbasedonarchaicEnglishprinciples’.67
Theauthorthereforeseemstohavemuchreasontofindfaultwitheverythingsheseesinmodernistdebates.Forexample,Agnes(2000:182)notesthattheMarriageBill,1994asformulatedbytheNationalCommissionforWomen‘makessweepingandunrealisticrecommendations,throwingallcautiontothewinds’.Agnes(2000:182–3)notes:
TheprimaryconcernoftheBillseemstobeabolitionofpolygamybyensuringcompulsoryregistrationofmarriages.Butinsteadofafacilitatingmeasure(ofprovidingproofincaseofdispute),registrationbecomesanendinitself.
(p.314) TheBillstipulatesthatadeclarationofmarriagemustbesenttotheRegistrarofmarriageswithinthreedaysofitsperformance.AfineofRs100perdayisleviedfordefaultforaperiodofonemonthandthereafterthemarriageisdeemedvoid.
Agnesisvocallycriticalofsuchproposalsandcommentsinvariouscontextsontheperniciouseffectsthatsuchformalisticlegalregulationwouldhaveforwomenandchildren,inparticular.Apartfromwarningaboutanincreaseinstatecontroloverpeople’slives(ibid.:187),animportantelementofheranalysis,Agnes(2000:183)alsonotestheresourceimplicationsofsuchreformproposals:
Whileprescribingsuchstringentmeasuresofcompulsoryregistration,thefactthatthegovernmenthasnotbeenabletoprovidebarenecessitieslikecleandrinkingwater,primaryeducationandbasichealthfacilitiestoalargesectionofitspeoplehasbeenoverlooked.TheBilldoesnotspelloutthemeasuresthroughwhichthegovernmentwillmakeitpossibleforpeopletoregistertheirmarriageswithinthree
![Page 35: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 35 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
daysofitsperformance.
Inaconsolidateddiscussionofthemainpoints,Agnes(2000:186–7)examinesthemajorelementsofthevariousmodernistreformproposals.Herfirstpointisfocusedontheuniformcivilcodeagenda.Agnes(2000:186)findsthat‘aconsensusseemstobesteadily,albeitgradually,emergingthattheprocessoffamilylawreformhastobecautious.Enforcingacompulsoryuniformcivilcodefromabovemaynotbethebestsolution’.Significantly,Agnes(2000:187)opposestheuseoftheterm‘spouse’anddemandsexplicitrecognitionofthespecificneedsofwomen.68Arguingthatanyrecommendationshavetobebasedonthesubstantivemodelofequality,sheasksforgreaterclarityregardingthetheoreticalframework,particularlyforacademics.Agnes(2000:188)doesnotappeartoseemuchhopeforsignificantlegalreformsinthenearfutureandthereforeissuesarallyingcall:
Women’srightsseemtobelostinthelargercontroversyaroundUniformCivilCodewhichtoday,hasbecomeapoliticalquestion.Onlythroughastepbystepapproachtobringinsmallandspecificreformthroughconcentratedcampaignscantherightsofwomenbesalvagedfromthepoliticalentanglewithinwhichtheyarecurrentlyenmeshed.
Agnes(2000:211)concludesthat‘‘women’srightsis[sic]notaprimaryconcernofthedominantforces’andarguesfinallythat‘thereisaneedtolocatepropertyatthecentreofmatrimoniallawreform’(ibid.:215).ThereismuchinthisrichanalysiswhichcanbesalvagedforapostmodernanalysisofHinduandIndianfamilylaw.Withspecificreferencetomarriagelaw,itishighlysignificantthatAgnes(2000:210)alsonotesthatthemodernstatemayinfactbeasgoodasirrelevantwhenitcomestoHindumarriageanddivorce:
(p.315) ThefactthattheHinduMarriageActhasvalidateddiversecustomsofmarriageanddivorce,seemstohavebeenoverlookedbythezealousreformers.AlthoughtheHinduMarriageActsetoutto‘reform’Hindulawandbringitunderthestatecontrolandregulations,sufficientscopewasprovidedforHinducustomsandpractices.Henceunderthepresentstatute,aHinduneedneverapproachastatefunctionaryorareligiousinstitutioneitherforsolemnizationofhis/hermarriageorforitsdissolution.
Ontheground,itwillalwaysremaintemptingforsomelitigants(andtheirlegaladvisers)tomisusethestate-sanctionedcustomaryflexibilityofHindumarriagetraditionsforobviouspecuniarybenefit,therebydamagingtheinterestsofwomen,especiallywidowsandremarriedwomen.Thecaselawconfirmsthatproblemsforthefemaleclaimantmaybemultipliedifshewaspreviouslymarriedtosomeoneelse.69
ManyreportedcasesunderSection7oftheHMAconstitutebonafidepetitionsbyHinduwomenseekingtoasserttheirrightsarisingfromtheirmarriagetoaHindumale.Still,theargumentthatanywomanwhoclaimstobemarriedtoaHindumalemustautomaticallybebelieved,doesnotrecommenditself.Itwouldencouragefalseclaimsofformalmarriage,wheninfacttherewasperhapsonlyaninformalliaison.Actually,thiskindofscenariopointstounresolvedlegalproblemsovertheboundariesbetweenpolygamyandunmarriedcohabitation.Theexistingacademicandlegaldiscussions,whilemoving
![Page 36: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 36 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
towardsapostmoderndiscourseinstudyingandunderstandingHindumarriagelaw,havehardlybeguntorealizethatanystrictlyformalregulationofHindumarriagewouldhavepotentiallynegativeconsequencesforthosemanywomenwhoarepartytoaquasi-maritalrelationshipthatmaynothavefullsocialsanction(seeAgnes2000:180,citedearlier).Itismorethanclearfromtheexistingcaselawthatsuchwomenoftenneedspecialprotectionthroughflexibleandsituation-specificapplicationofthecriteriaforHindumarriage.Thus,whilescholarlydebateshavebeguntorealizethelimitsofmodernistdiscourse,thisrecognitionhasdevelopedinignoranceoftherealityofthepostmodernconditionthathasbeenevolvingandblossomingthroughtheapplicationofHindumarriagelawintheIndiancourts.
AnEmergingPostmodernCondition:CaseLawEvidence
Detailedresearchoncaselawshowsmanyreportedandunreporteddisputesinwhichthestrictofficiallegalpositionon‘properceremonies’wasexploitedbyruthlesshusbandsduringthe1970sand1980stothedetrimentofwomen.(p.316) Lookingmorecloselyatthecases,however,IfoundthatthecaselawunderSection7oftheHMAactuallyfallsintotwotypes,namelyappealsbyHinduhusbandsseekingtoavoidaprosecutionforpolygamy,andcasesbyHinduwomenclaimingtheirentitlementsfromthemarriage.WhereHinduhusbandswereaccusedandconvictedofbigamy,andwentonappeal,thecourtstriedtoassisttheman,developingintheprocessastrictlyformalcaselawthatseemstograntonlycompletelyritualizedHindumarriagesfulllegalrecognition.Thisstrictness,however,isonlypartlyexplainedbytheevidentiaryrequirementsofthecriminallaw;70itisalsobasedonapro-meninterpretation,simplytoavoidthatthepolygamoushusbandshouldbepunishedorevensenttojail.
Bythemid-1980s,theconsequencesoftakingthisbiasedangleinthecaselawbecameverybadforwomenandchildrenandjudgesrealizedthattherewasasecondtypeofcaseconcerningHindumarriagesolemnization.Herethekeyissuewastheentitlementsofthewifeasaresultofthemarriage.SomeSupremeCourtjudgesbegantorealizehowdangerouslyeasyithadbecomeforHindumentodivesttheirwivesofrightfulclaims.Wherecouldtheygoforhelpifthecourtsdidnotinterveneinabalancedmanner?Thisrealizationapparentlywenthandinhandwithgrowingjudicialactivismandawarenessaboutthemaintenancerightsofdivorcedwives.71However,ratherthanmakingabigissueoutofthis,forexamplebypubliclydemaskingtheoldpro-menprecedentofBhauraoShankarAIR1965SC1564,theSupremeCourtchoseamoresubtlestrategy,applyingapresumptionofmarriageinsteadofdemandingstrictproof.Becauseofthesubtletyemployedhere,mostlegalwritersdidnotnoticethesecondtypeofHinducaselawonmarriagesolemnization,whilemanypractisinglawyerswereonlytoohappytooverlooktheemergentpostmodernlegalpositioninthecaselawonHindumarriagesolemnization.
ItappearsthatthesubtletransitionoftheHindumarriagelawintoapostmoderncondition,underthesecondtypeofcaselaw,canbelocatedinSumitraDevivBhikhanChoudharyAIR1985SC765.ThiswasanappealbyaHinduwifefromBiharagainsttherefusalofherclaimtomaintenance,resistedbythehusbandonvariousgrounds,
![Page 37: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 37 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
includingtheallegationthatshewasnotproperlymarriedtohim.ThisbriefcasereportcontainsanimportantrestatementofthelawbytheSC,whichhardlyanybodyseemstohavepickedupatthetime.72RanganathMisraJ,criticizingthetechnicalapproachtakenbythelowercourtandtheHC,heldatp.766:
(p.317) ThereisnodoubtthatinorderthattheremaybeavalidmarriageaccordingtoHindulaw,certainreligiousriteshavetobeperformed.InvokingthefireandperformingSaptapadiaroundthesacredfirehavebeenconsideredbythisCourttobetwoofthebasicrequirementsforatraditionalmarriage.Itisequallytruethattherecanbeamarriageacceptableinlawaccordingtocustomswhichdonotinsistonperformanceofsuchritesasreferredtoaboveandmarriagesofthistypegiverisetolegalrelationshipswhichlawaccepts.
Wehearnotawordaboutmodernismorpostmodernism,butthelearnedjudgeisineffectdecreeingpostmodernpluralism,layingdownthatexplicitrecognitionofthefactsandcircumstancesofindividualcasesismoreimportantthanfollowingtheSupremeCourt’sownprecedentsintheotherlineofcasesonmarriagesolemnization.Justice,inotherwords,ismorevaluablethantheformalityofthelaw.Thisdecisionclearlyrefutesthemodernist,uniforming,formallyrigidlegalpositionthathadbuiltupinthelineofcasesinvolvingpolygamoushusbands.Thejudgeavoidsfurtherdiscussionbyswiftlyremittingthecasetothelowercourtfordisposal.InSumitraDevi,thetangibleissuewastheentitlementoftheHinduwifetorecognitionofhermarriedstatusandherfinancialclaims.HereweseepostmodernIndiansocialwelfarelawinaction.ButonlyifweunderstandtheinherentprinciplesofHindulawareweabletorecognizethattheSCreliedinthisotherwiseinsignificantcasenotonastate-basedmodernformoflegalregulation,butontheflexibletraditionalHinduconceptsofself-controlledordering—ifnecessarywithalittlepushfromthecourts.Thereasonfordoingsowasagaintoavoidinjusticetowomen,notglorificationofHindunormsorprinciplesofHindulaw.Andyet,ineffect,thiscasestronglyupholdsthecustomarydiversityoftraditionalHindumethodsofmarriagesolemnization.Itis,however,notabackward-lookingdecisionthattiesHindumentoreligiousobligations,butaforward-lookingsocialwelfareapproachdesignedtoprotecttheinterestsofweakersectionsinsociety.
Asindicated,thiswasprimarilyamaintenancecase,sohardlyanybodynoticedthelinkwiththelawofmarriagesolemnization.73ThepredicamentsofHinduwomeninthisregardhavebeencomplicatedwhenthemarriageritualsinquestionweretruncatedorinsomewaymodifiedfromearliercustomarypatterns.AsseenintheearliersectiononmodernistreformstoHindumarriagelaw,thiswasalreadythecaseinDeivainiAchiAIR1954Mad657,onaccountofsocialchangesinthatparticularcommunityof‘self-respecters’.74Problemshavearisenforremarriedwomen,especiallywidowsmarryingawidower,whowouldcustomarilyperformonlyminimalrituals.ThewomeninsuchcasesshouldbeprotectedunderthewideumbrellaofSection7ofthe(p.318) HMA,butthetwistedcaselawonHindupolygamyhasposedconsiderableriskstomanyHinduwomen.
Moredetailedresearchonsuchcaseswouldshowvariouscustomaryformsoftruncatedoreventotallyabsentmarriagerituals,andtheconsequentapplicationofa
![Page 38: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 38 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
presumptionofmarriage.75ApartfromSikhmarriagecustomswhichhavelongallowedforremarriageinthekarewaform,therearecasesinvolvingHindusfromMaharashtra,76Kerala,77andotherpartsofIndia,allacceptingthelegalvalidityofunusualmarriageceremonies,withsomeofthemconcerningwidowremarriages.
Incontrast,thedreadfulcaseofSurjitKaurvGarjaSinghAIR1994SC135concernedaSikhwidow’sclaimtoashareinthedeceasedhusband’sproperty,whichwasfiercelyresistedbythehusband’sfamily.Allegingthatthewidowwasnotadecentwoman,evidentcharacterassassinationwasemployedthroughtheallegationthat‘SurjitKaurwasinthehabitofchanginghusbandsfrequently’(p.136).BoththeChandigarhHCandtheSupremeCourtappeartohavebeenimpressedbysuchanti-womenrhetoricandsexualinnuendo,therebyoverlookingtheoveralljusticeinvolvedanditswatchdogfunction.ThiscaseprovidesstrongevidenceoflackofjudicialsensitivityaboutgenderandHindumarriagesolemnization,andissimplyabadcase(Menski1995b;2001:33–5).ItisofcoursenotuniquetoIndianlaworHindulawthatthereshouldbeconflictinglegalpositions.Butinthiscasesomethingelsewentseriouslywrong:Thiswoman’sclaimtopropertyentitlementwastreated,intermsofevidencelaw,likeaman’sdefenceagainstpolygamy.Asaresult,thestrictcriteriaforcustomaryritualswereapplied,insteadofconsideringapresumptionofmarriage,aswasdoneinothercasesatthesametime,inthesameyear,andevenbythesamecourt.78
Aneasysuitablesolutiontothiskindoflegalproblemcannotbefound,asmodernistreformersarealwaystemptedtoargue,byremovingHindumarriagetraditionsandbringinginmodernsecularstatelaw.Marriageremainsahumansocialinstitutionresistanttototalitarianmodernistregimentation.Moreover,theIndianlegalsystemisclearlynotinaposition,forfinancialaswellasorganizationalreasons,tointroduceacompulsorymarriageregistrationsystem(p.319) asabasisfordeterminingthelegalvalidityofallmarriages,aprerogativethatEnglishlawandmostWesternjurisdictionshaveclaimed,butareevidentlyfailingtomaintain.79
Therefore,hereisanotherelementofpostmodernanalysisrelevanttothepresentcase:UnlikeprosperousandfairlysmallWesterncountries,ahugenationlikeIndiawillevidentlyneverbeinapositiontoattachwelfarerightentitlementstomarriedstatus.Atanyrate,thenumberofpotentialclaimantswouldbeunmanageable.Thelegalsystemthereforemustcontinue,ofnecessity,torelyonthetraditionalcustomarypatternsofmarriagesolemnization.Publicrecognitionofmaritalstatusthroughsocialprocessesmustremainthemaincriterion.Iftheaimistoprotectwomen,theirpositionandbargainingpowerinsocietyhastobestrengthened.Wedonotneednewlawsforthat,butactivistengagementforprotectionofindividualrights.
Atthesametime,therearedeepersocioculturalreasonsforwhyHindumarriagesolemnizationwithoutdulyelaboratedritualization(howeverdiffuselyperceivedinanyparticularsituation),orsimpleregistrationofmarriage,willremainwidelyunacceptable.80Firstly,withintheṛta/dharmacontext,anunsolemnizedmarriagebetweenHindusissimplynotaHindumarriage,becausetheinvisiblelinksbetweenmacrocosmicworldand
![Page 39: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 39 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
microcosmicspherehavenotbeencreated.Itisarguablethatforthisbasicculturalreasonalone,andnotjustoutofafearof‘illicitsex’,mostHindusfindasystemofunmarried‘cohabitation’deeplyunsatisfactoryandevenoffensive.Itfollowsthattheywouldthereforenotbesatisfiedwithstate-controlledformalregistrationproceduresbythemselves.TheywouldtreatthemselvesasmarriedonlyaftertheHinduritualsofsolemnizationhavebeencompleted.81
Allofthisputspaidtomodernisthopesfroma‘lawanddevelopment’or‘socialengineeringthroughlaw’angle.Bytheearly1990s,itwasbecomingincreasinglyclearallaroundthatIndianlawnolongereventriestofollow(p.320) suchWesternmodels(Menski1996b;2001).Then,whatwouldbethepointofanelaboratesystemofmarriageregistrationiftheinformationproducedwouldanywaybeofnorealusetothestateandcouldnotbefullyandreliablycollectedinthefirstplace?Thenewsystemwouldinevitablycreatemoreproblemsthanitmighteverhopetosolve.
Indeed,asseenfromthediscussionbyAgnes(2000)asoutlinedabove,itismorewidelyrecognizedtodaythattheformalintroductionofcompulsoryregistrationofallmarriagesinIndiawouldonlycreatemanynewsocio-legalproblemsandisnotasensibleitemofreformprogrammesforthestate.82Mostcrucially,itwouldnotbeaneffectiveremedyforwomenwhoareindangerofbeingdeniedmaritalstatus.ThisdoesnotsimplymeanthatIndiahasfailedtomodernize,therefore,butthatthisimportantcountryanditslegalsystemhaveconsciouslychosennottofollowtherouteofWesternmodernizingmodelsandarerelyinginsteadonindigenousmethodsofself-controlledordering.Derrett(1978a:121)anticipatedthislongago,pointingtothefactthattheoverwhelmingmajorityofHinduslivedinvillagesandtothem,‘acivilmarriageimpliesanegationofeverythingthattheyliveby’.83
AcombinedreadingofSections7and8oftheHMA1955confirmsthatthedominantcriterionforlegalvalidityofHindumarriagesinIndiaremainsobservanceofcustomarymarriagerituals,andnot—asinmostWesterncountries—compliancewiththestate’slawonmarriageregistration.Giventhatcustomarynormsandconventionsaredecidedbypeopleandatthelocallevel,thisconstitutesacomprehensiveabdicationoftheIndianstate’sclaimtoregulatemarriagelaw.Thisisacriticalandsignificantfindingwhich,somehow,modernistscholarshiphasbeenreluctanttorecognize.
Thecourtsystem,therefore,remainstheonlyformalelementofsuperveningstatecontrolinthisfield.FromaHindulawperspective,thisislittlemorethanasupervisorymechanism,akindofsafetynettopreventblatantinjustice,arolethatisfamiliarlyknowninHindulegaltradition.Itisthusnotaninstitutionwhoseinvolvementmustbesoughtineverycase.Infact,liketheancientHinduruler’scourt,andintandemwiththeprinciplesofvyavahāra,formalrecoursetodisputesettlementmechanismsshouldnotbemadeunlessattemptsatself-controlledorderinghavefailed.ThisconfirmsthefindingbyseveralauthorsthatHindusinIndiatodaydonotneedthestatetomarryand(p.321)todivorce.Ratherthanbeingseenassomedeficientaberration,thisactuallyreflectsthepostmodernconditionofHindumarriagelaw.
![Page 40: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 40 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
Thepresentanalysis,thus,pointstoapoliterefusalonthepartoftheIndianstatetocarryanyrealresponsibilityforthemaintenanceofanyformallawonmarriagesolemnization.TheIndianpostmodernstate,inamoreorlesssilentprocessofsurrender,recognizestheinternalpowerandstrengthofHinduconceptsandcustomarynorms,andthusreliesonsocietytoself-regulate,withoutexplicitlyusingancienttermslikesadācāra.Ineffect,thestatehashandedultimateauthoritynottosomesaffronmen,buttothepeopleofIndia,whoareafterall—atleastinconstitutionalrhetoric—thesovereignauthorityofthenation.Evenfromaconstitutionalangle,thus,thissubtleregroupingoflegalauthoritiesisbeyondreproach.Itisabouttimethatanthropologicalandlegalscholarshiprecognizesthisscenarioasapostmodernconditionandembarksonnewcriticalresearchthatmovesbeyondmodernistparadigmsandindoctrinationtoanalysetheresultinglegalquestionswhichthispostmodernconditionposes.
Notes:
(1)FollowingthesagaciousadviceofProfessorDerrett,IwrotemyPh.DthesisonHindumarriageconceptsandthesolemnizationofHindumarriages(Menski1984).
(2)DerretthimselfhadlongbeeninterestedinwhattypesofmaritalexpectationstheHinduweddingritualsdramatized,andhesetmeonarichseamofmaterialthatstillrequiresexhaustiveresearch.Derrett(1978a:197–8)contrastedthepresuppositionsofWesternspousesandthetrendtowardseasyremarriagewiththeobservationthatIndianspouses‘haveonlythemostbasicandcrudeexpectations.Thosewhomarrywithlowexpectationsareseldomdisappointedwitheachother’(ibid.:198).
(3)Likeeveryoneelse,HindushavetheoptiontoregistertheirmarriageundertheSMA1954.Insomecasesofmarriagebetweenspousesofdifferentreligiousand/orculturalbackgroundsitisnotonlyadvisablebutalsorequiredbythelegalsystemtoregisterthemarriageformallywiththestateauthorities.
(4)TheleadingstudiesinthisfieldhavebeenproducedbySanskritists.SeeinparticularPandey(1969);Chatterjee(1972–4);Chatterjee(1972);Apte(1978);Chatterjee(1978).
(5)Mostrecently,Basu(2001)isanexampleofsuchwriting,whileThomas(2000:14)takesadimviewofmarriageitself,treatingitas‘aninstitutionofsex-slavery’.Hereisamodernauthorwhoapparentlyhasideologicalproblemswithmarriageitselfandfumesaboutallaspectsofpatriarchy.Suchwritingdoesnotenlightenreaderstounderstandbasickeyconcepts.
(6)Acritiqueofsuchworkswouldbelongandtedious.OneofthemostrecentexamplesofsuchwritingisDograandDogra(2000).Ihaveusedonlysomeelementsfromsuchstudies,asindicatedinthereferenceslater.
(7)Stein(1998:52–3)pointstotheroleofAgniaschiefpriestinHindumarriagerituals.Inthepresentcontext,itwouldbeusefultoperceivethis‘firegod’astheṛticlinkforaHindumarriage,makingtheroleofthestateredundant.
![Page 41: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 41 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
(8)Intheextreme,itispossibletoidentifyapotential‘zero-ritual’astheacceptedcustomarypattern,forexample,fortheremarriageofaHinduwidow(Menski2001:20–4).
(9)Bumiller(1991:25)emphasizesthecostsofweddings:‘InIndia,aweddingisachaoticpageantthatcanlastuntilsixinthemorning,andmoreandmorehasbecomeapublicvalidationofafamily’sstatusandwealth.Ifafamilyisrich,itisnotunusualtohaveathousandguests.Evenaworking-classfamilywillputonafeastfortwohundred,ensuringcripplingdebtforthenextdecade’.
(10)Thisisaslightlyyoungertext,stillbelongingtothepre-classicalVedicperiod,andthusdateabletoaround1000BCorpossiblylater.
(11)Thisisinessence,asthenamesays,aritualinvolvingsevensteps,buttherearesomanyvariationsofit,andsuchamazingdistortionsoftheoryandpractice,thatawholebookcouldbewrittenjustonthattopic.Somerelevantdetailsarediscussedlater.
(12)Chatterjeeetal.(1971:58)alsoobservethatmarriageisauniversalphenomenoninSouthAsia.
(13)Nair(1978:2)arguesthattheuniversalityofmarriageamongtheloweststrataofHindusocietyisalsoexemplifiedbythemarriageofprostitutestomockhusbandsbeforeinitiationintotheirprofession.
(14)WherethisleavestheShudrasisanimportantquestionthatisnotproperlyaddressedintheliterature,whichhasanobviousSanskriticbias.Iamlessthanimpressedwiththetraditionalmodelofthe‘eightformsofmarriage’,inwhichtheworstmethodsofgettingmarried(byrapeandpillage,itseems)aresimplyallocatedtoShudras,asthoughtheyknewnothingelse.TheprevalenceoflocalandcastecustomsofmarriageinsuchcommunitieswasconfirmedbytheSupremeCourtofIndiainM.GovindarajuvK.MunisamiGounderAIR1997SC10.AnotherrecentcasestressingthevalueoforalevidenceaboutaHindumarriageisRajanBaboovUPPublicServiceCommission(1998)8SCC580.
(15)FeministinterpretationsoftenforgetthepressureonHindumeninthisrespectandbehaveasthoughonlywomenwereundersuchcompulsions.Theancientliteraryevidenceonthisisclearandstrong,becausethe‘fashion’amongmenofbypassingthestagesoflifeandbecomingarenounceronanaccelerated‘routetosalvation’(mokṣa)wasperceivedtothreatenthefutureofsocietyasawhole.TheworkofPatrickOlivelle(1993)ismostrelevantinthisregard,asisSprockhoff(1976)onthewiderphenomenonanditsphilosophicalrepresentations.
(16)Weinberger-Thomas(1999:128)emphasizesthecentralroleofHindumarriage(andofwomen)inRajasthanisocietytoday,showinghowthislinkstoconceptsofthe‘idealwife’.
![Page 42: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 42 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
(17)Forsomemisguidedpositivisteffortsto‘laydownthelaw’,seefurtherlater.
(18)Inourtime,theaimmaybetopreventtheabuseoftraditionandtoincreasepublicawarenessofthesignificanceoftheHindumarriagerituals.AninterestingrecentexamplecomesfromSouthAfrica,underthetitleof‘Vedicweddingceremony’(Vaidikvivāhavidhi),compiledbyRambilass(2001).DograandDogra(2000)aimtoprovideageneralguidebookformodernreaders,butareoftentooprescriptiveonritualdetails,whilealsomakingsomeeffortstoemphasizeplurality.
(19)SeePandey(1969:153);Shastri(1990:31).
(20)Seee.g.Derrett(1963c:137–8);Variar(1985:19).OnHindumarriageceremonies,seeDesai(1998:663–4).
(21)InmodernIndia,Bumiller(1991:36)observedwhatlookslikeapropertraditionalsaptapadīritual:‘Thecoupletooksevensteps,eachonerepresentingablessing:food,strength,wealth,happiness,progeny,cattleanddevotion.Aftertheseventhstep,themarriagewasirrevocable.Thepriestsprinkledholywateronthecouple’.
(22)Inthecontextofdowry,Bumiller(1991:112)statesthatanunmarriedwomaninruralIndiawouldhavebeenshunnedfortherestofherlife,hencethereishugepressureontheparentstoarrangeforhermarriage.
(23)ForsomedetailsonthefascinatingcaselawaboutthisquestioninpostindependenceIndia,seeAgnes(2000:84–5),whonotesachangeinfavourofwomen’sperspectivesfromabout1975onwards.Argumentsthatwomenhavenorightsinthisfieldoverlookvarioustraditionalpatternsofpost-maritalresidenceinwhichthehusband,oftenforsoundeconomicreasons,agreestomovetothewife’sfamilyandworkswith(andoftenfor)them.
(24)Derrett(1968b:558)rightlywarnedthat‘[t]hedifferencesbetweenHinduismandChristianityandIslamasknowninIndiahavebeenexaggerated’.
(25)AccordingtoDerrett(1968b:89),Manudevelopedtheone-fleshdoctrineofmarriage.
(26)Thelanguageofthisauthorreflectstosomeextentthatthiswasoriginallywrittenin1918.
(27)SeeinparticularPandey(1969:158–170).AlsousefulareNair(1978:16);Mitra(1965:30–43);Sharma(1993:21–32)andDesai(1998:651–53).Derrett(1963c:147)writesthatitusedtobeimportanttoknowinwhatformawomanwasmarried,butdoesnotgointodetailonthispoint.
(28)However,thisisnotcorrect,sinceSection7(1)specifies‘eitherparty’,notboth.
(29)Atleastnineeditionsofthisbookhaveappeared.SeeDiwanandDiwan(1993)and
![Page 43: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 43 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
theirlaterworksunderdifferenttitles.
(30)InCh.8.3later,wereturntothequestionofessentialceremoniesunderthemodernHindulaw.ItwillbecomeapparenttherethatDiwan’sobfuscatingstanceactuallyprotectedHindupolygamistsfromcriminalprosecutions(seeCh.10),whichmaybetakenasevidenceofcollusionamongmalelawyers.
(31)Inthiscase,Rukhmabai(whohadbeenmarriedattheageofeleven)opposedthelegalclaimofherhusbandtorestitutionofconjugalrightselevenyearsafterthemarriage.TheBritishIndiancourtsultimatelyheldthattheHinduhusbandwasentitledtothecompanyofhiswife,butdidnotenforcethedecision.
(32)Theseeffortsweresociallynoteffective,asWeinberger-Thomas(1999:146)demonstrateswithreferencetoacaseinthe1920sfromRajasthan.
(33)TherewereearlierSatiRegulationsfrom1813onwards,asWeinberger-Thomas(1999)stresses.
(34)However,pre-1955caselawconfirmsthatrecognitionofcustomarypatternsremainedagraveproblem,asshowninDeivainiAchivChitambaramChettiarAIR1954Mad657.
(35)Minoritylaws,everywhere,areseentobeundersiege.WhileIndianMuslimlawisoftenportrayedasbeingthreatenedbymodernistreforms(Mahmood1986),inPakistanandBangladeshtheHindulawremainsanunwantedandunreformedcolonialrelic(seeMenskiandRahman1988forBangladesh).
(36)Mahmood(1981:4)writesthat‘[t]oday,Hindus,Buddhists,SikhsandJains—allfourcompendiouslyknownbythelegalterm“Hindu”—aretheproudpossessorofthemostprogressivemarriagelawofIndia…Therehasthusbeenarealupheaval…TheHindumarriagelaw…hastravelledalongwayfromwhereitstoodin1856’.TheAnandMarriageActof1909hadearlierlegalizedSikhmarriageritesknownasanandkaraj.
(37)OnsimilarpolicyaimsofnationbuildingforTanzaniaandtheirlimitedsocialimpact,seeMoore(1986).Jain(1990:601—2)showsthatadifferentstrategythanbringingthesegroupsunderHindulawwouldhavemadethemsubjecttotheseculargenerallaw.
(38)SeealsoDesai(1998:650),whichcreatesatotallegalfictionandisquitemisleadinginviewofthewordingofSection7oftheHMA,citedlater.
(39)InPartapSinghvUnionofIndiaAIR1985SC1695,aSikhDonQuixotemanagedtocomeallthewaytotheSupremeCourtofIndia,challengingtheclaimstoashareinthefamilypropertybyhisfather’stwowidows,tobetoldthathedefinitelycouldnotlawfullyasserthispatriarchalclaimstotheexclusionofthewomen.OnJainalaw,seeMenski(1993b).
(40)Onvariousaspectsoflegaldebatesrelatingtosocialnormsandtheextentoftheir
![Page 44: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 44 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
legalrecognition,seeKuppuswami(1986:43–54);DiwanandDiwan(1993:20–25and45–50);Desai(1998:85–8).
(41)InasubsequentsectiondealingwithpostmodernevolutionofHindumarriagelaw,anotherpassagefromtheconclusionsbythesamewriterwillbecitedtoshowthatheeventuallyreconsideredhissuggestions.
(42)Tiwari(1991:44)alsoarguesavidlyforregistrationofmarriage.SeealsoShams(1991).
(43)ThisisanoldissueindebatesaboutHindumarriagesolemnization;seeJain(1961)andMathur(1962).Derrett(1963c:137)notedthat‘theformationofintentionissomewhathandicappedinthemajorityofHinducommunities’becausemarriagestendtobearranged.
(44)ThecountryreportsinBainham(1998)confirmthatthereisnosuchinternationalagreementorsystem,andinlegalpracticemanyproblemsoccur.
(45)ThisargumentreliesonTowardsEquality(1974),whichappearstohaveinspiredalotofreformistwriting.Similarly,Singh(1989:65–6)claimsthatcompulsoryregistrationservesasaneffectivecheckonchildmarriageandpolygamyandoffersreliableproofofmarriage.
(46)Weinberger-Thomas(1999:188)reportsfromherfieldworkinRajasthanthat‘manyvillagersdonotknowtheirexactdateofbirth;andnotsomanyyearsago,theregistrationofbirthsanddeathswasregardedasaBritisheccentricity’.Inafootnotetothispointsheadds:‘Itisstillcommontodaynottoregisterbirthsanddeaths,afactthat1991censusproceduresacknowledge.Asformarriagesanddivorces,theseareneverregistered’(ibid.:264n.31).
(47)Pandey(1969:200)himselfstatesthathefollowedthefullermodeloftheAtharvavedasequence,butfromwhathetellsusaboutthegṛhyasūtras,itisevidentthatthereisnoonecustomaryortextualpattern.
(48)Inthecontextofsatirituals,Weinberger-Thomas(1999:141)findsasimilarpicture,arguing(muchmoreelegantlythanlawyers)that‘[t]raditionreinventsitselfbydrawingonthebric-a-bracofculturalartifactsathand’.
(49)Singh(1989:59)alsoindicatesthatthemajorconcernsrelatingtomarriagehavebeenpolygamyanditseffectiveabolition,ageofmarriage,compulsoryregistrationofmarriages,anddowry.
(50)TheimportantcaseofBabyvJayantMahadeoJagtapAIR1981Bom283reducedthisperiodtosometwentyyears,giventhatalargecommunityofpeople,inthiscaseneo-Buddhists,hadfollowedthose‘newcustoms’.
(51)TheeventualresultwastheHinduMarriage(MadrasAmendment)Actof1967,
![Page 45: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 45 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
whichmodifiesSection7oftheHMAforthestateofTamilNadu(thenMadras)only,insertinganewSection7-AafterSection7inthemainAct.FordetailsoftheoriginaltextseeMenski(2001:14–15).
(52)SuchcasesalsocomeupintheUKnowadays.Whileitisdifficulttodefendthepositionofcustominthisfield,someEnglishjudgesarewillingtorecognizethatHindulawmayhavedifferentmethodsofdealingwithmarriagesolemnizationcomparedtoEnglishlaw.
(53)Therelevantdetailsarefoundunderparagraph23atp.58ofthejudgment.
(54)AusefulauthorityforthispositionisSumitraDevivBhikhanChoudharyAIR1985SC765.
(55)Onemustbeconsciousofthefactthatthelanguagecouldalsobecriticizedasbeingtoopositivist.Isitreallythecasethatthemodernlawhasgrantedtraditionanewleaseoflife,ordoesthelawjusthavetoadmitdefeat?Thiswillalwaysremainacontestedissue.
(56)Aswesaw,Derrett(1957:276–7)earlierenvisagedvirtuallyunlimitedprogressforHindusocietyinthedirectionofmodernization,butlaterreconsideredhismodernistenthusiasm.
(57)Ondetailsregardingrenouncersandascetics,seeSprockhoff(1976);Olivelle(1993).
(58)TheDowryProhibitionActof1961,too,withaseriesofimportantamendmentsduringthe1980s,illustratesthatthethreatofstate-imposedlegalsanctionsalonedoesnotinducedesiredbehaviourinsociety.Ithasbeenestimatedthatmorethan25,000womendieorareseriouslymaimedinIndiaeveryyearasaresultofdowry-relateddomesticviolence,whileitisevidentthatattemptstocontrolthesocalleddowryproblemthroughthestate’slegalframeworkhaveremainedlargelyineffective.Onthisproblemanditsvariousdimensions,seeMenski(1998b).
(59)Banerjee(1984:281–2)speaksof‘ourmedievalinheritance’androundlycriticizes‘conservatives’likeWarrenHastingsandothersafterhimwhohadsuggestedthatIndiancivilizationwasdifferentfromEuropeancivilization,thoughnotnecessarilyinferior.Hisfinalconcludingparagraphatp.288roundlyandpompouslydismissesthenotionthatHindutraditionscontainanythingusefulforconstructingmoderndemocraticvaluesandsystems.Suchviewsarestronglyreflectedinmodernistfeministliterature(e.g.SarkarandButalia1995;Rajan1998).
(60)SeekingtoimproveonH.L.A.Hart’stheoreticalmodeloflaw,Tamanaha(2001)challengesthe‘mirrorthesis’oflawandsociety,andbeginstowriteabout‘order’asacoordinationofbehaviourinsociety,whichcomesratherclosetotheconceptofsadācāraintraditionalHindulaw(lastsectionofChapter3).
(61)Earlier,Derrett(1963c:139)hadarguedthatthissecularlawwasstillvirtuallyirrelevantinpractice.
![Page 46: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 46 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
(62)Agnes(2000:244)reproducesthesamefiguresasPujariandKaushikfor1968–72andaddsstatisticsforregistrationundertheSMAinMumbaibetween1986and1996.Theyearlytotalsnevergobeyond2000registrations.
(63)EvidencefromfieldworkamongHindusinBritainconfirms,inaddition,thateveninalegalsystemthatofficiallyinsistsonregistrationofallmarriages,Hindus(andother‘ethnicminorities’)tendtogivemoreimportancetothesocio-religioussolemnizationofthemarriagethantotheformalregistrationwiththestate(fordetailsseeMenski1987;1991a;1993a).
(64)Significantevidenceofnon-registrationofmarriagesinEnglandisdiscussedbyAllott(1980:259–86).
(65)Agnes(2000:195–6)wronglyassumesthatPakistanhasreformeditstraditionalMuslimlawthroughmodernistlegislativeinterventionsbytheMuslimFamilyLawsOrdinancein1961.Inreality,thesearemerelyreformative‘paper’statementsthathavelittlepracticalimpact.Pakistanneitherrequirescompulsorymarriageregistrationnorhasitcontrolledpolygamyorabolishedthe‘tripletalaq’,asAgnes(2000:196)claims.SuchmistakesconfirmthatthereisanurgentneedforIndianlegalscholarshiponPakistantobeupdated.
(66)Intwoappendices,Agnes(2000:216–21)reprintsanddiscussestheDomesticViolencetoWomen(Prevention)Bill,1994,andtheMarriedWomen(ProtectionofRights)Bill,1994.Noneofthesebecameofficiallaw,theywereclearlytooradical,especiallyintermsoffinancialimplicationsformarriedmen.
(67)Agnes(2000:209)againoverstatestheEnglishinfluencewhensheclaimsthat‘allstatutorymatrimoniallawsinIndia,excepttheMuslimlaw,arebasedonEnglishlawsofmarriage’.SuchassumptionsseemtobeuncriticallycopiedfromBanerjee(1984).
(68)Inthiscontext,sheisextremelycriticalofthefactthatHindumenareabletoclaimmaintenancefromtheirwivesundercertainprovisionsoftheHMA1955.
(69)BibbevRamKaliAIR1982All248.InSurjitKaurvGarjaSinghAIR1994SC135,discussedfurtherlater,theSCdeprivedatwice-widowedSikhwomanofherdueshareonthegroundthatshewasnotvalidlymarriedunderHindulaw,eventhoughshealsoproducedamarriagecertificate.Fordetailsandacritique,seeMenski(1995band2001:33–5).
(70)Therelevantlegalprinciplehereisthatanaccusedshouldbepresumedinnocentuntilprovenguilty,sinceinacriminalprosecution,proof‘beyondreasonabledoubt’hastobeadduced.
(71)AninfluentialearlycaseonHinduwomen’smaintenanceisSoundarammalvSundaraMahalingaNadarAIR1980Mad294.After1985,thediscussionsabouttheShahBanocaseobviouslyhadanimpact,too.
![Page 47: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 47 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
(72)Forexample,thenormallyquitecomprehensiveAnnualSurveyofIndianLawfor1986doesnotmentionthiscase,anditwasalsooverlookedorpurposelyignoredbyothercommentators.DiwanandDiwan(1990:100–1)discussthiscaseinthecontextofmaintenance.
(73)Theheadnoteofthecaseonlymentionsmaintenance,sotime-pressedlawyerswouldnoteasilyfindthiscaseiftheywerelookingformaterialonmarriagesolemnization.
(74)Onthisparticularcommunityandtheagendaofitsleaders,seeSubramanian(1999).
(75)OnpresumptionofmarriageseeDesai(1990:639),aleadingpractitioners’handbook.
(76)NinguVithuBamanevSadashivNinguBamaneAIR1987Bom27recognizesapatmarriageasanapproved,customaryformofmarriageamongHindusinMaharashtraandfollowedanearliercasetothateffect.
(77)NarayananNamboodirivBhargaviAmma1989(1)KLT547explicitlyreliesonSumitraDeviAIR1985SC765holdingthatthecustomarylocalformofmarriageknowninKeralaassambandamwasfullyrecognizedbythelaw.
(78)ThecaseofS.P.S.BalasubramanyamvSutturayanAIR1994SC133arosefromMadras,butthatitselfshouldnothavemadeasignificantdifference.Inthiscase,remarkably,apresumptionofmarriagewasappliedbythesamejudgeswhorefuseditsoperationinSurjitKaur.
(79)InmodernEnglishlaw,‘cohabitation’hasbecomeincreasinglyequatedwithformalmarriage,atleastasfaraspropertyandsuccessionlaw,andtherightsofanychildrenareconcerned(Allott1980:259–86).MorerecentevidencefromEnglandshowsthatthestatewilleventuallyhavetograntformallegalrecognitiontoallkindsofmarriages(includingHindumarriages)whichdidnot,attheirinception,followtheprescribedlegalpattern.SeeGereisvYagoub[1997]1FLR854andparticularlyChiefAdjudicationOfficervBath2000[1]FLR8(CA),aSikhcaseinwhichthecouplehadmarriedonlyinagurudwarainLondonthirty-fiveyearsago,buttheEnglishCourtofAppealhadtorecognizethewidow’spensionclaims.
(80)MostmodernistswouldnownotventuretosuggestthatMuslimsshouldabandontheircontractofmarriagebeforeGod,thenikah,whilemembersofotherreligionsaresomehowstillexpectedtoshedtheirsocioculturalandreligioustraditionsmoreeasily.
(81)Indeed,AsiansinBritaindonot,withfewexceptions,followapatternofcohabitation.Ineffecttheyendup‘marryingtwice’(Menski1987;1991a;1993a).ForsimilarevidenceregardingMuslimsinBritain,seePearlandMenski(1998:73–7).
(82)CorbridgeandHarriss(2000:167)rightlypointtotheviolenceofcuttingprimaryeducationinIndiatothebone.Sowhereandhowwouldmoneyformarriageregistrationsystemsbefound?
![Page 48: University Press Scholarship Online Oxford Scholarship ......The solemnization of Hindu marriages is first of all a matter of social conventions and ritual elaboration, involving the](https://reader033.fdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022060509/5f2564113960ef73d96026bf/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Hindu Marriage Law
Page 48 of 48
PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (www.oxfordscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2015.All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the l icence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of amonograph in OSO for personal use (for details see http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/page/privacy-policy). Subscriber: UniversityGrants Commission; date: 08 June 2015
(83)Similarly,KishwarandVanita(1991:15)criticizethemisguidedmodernistassumptionthaturbanmodelshavebecomedominantfortheruralmassesofIndia,arguingthat‘inrealityitisthefamilystructureofthedominantpeasantcastesandtheirformsofpropertyorganizationthatactasthenorminIndia…MosturbancentresinIndiaarelikeislandsintimatelyinfluencedbythevastoceanofthecountryside’.
Accessbroughttoyouby: UniversityGrantsCommission