University of Wisconsin–Madisonimages.library.wisc.edu/EcoNatRes/EFacs/Wetlands/...Agr icul tural...

20

Transcript of University of Wisconsin–Madisonimages.library.wisc.edu/EcoNatRes/EFacs/Wetlands/...Agr icul tural...

Page 1: University of Wisconsin–Madisonimages.library.wisc.edu/EcoNatRes/EFacs/Wetlands/...Agr icul tural areas increased sl ightly, to 17%, while freshwater wetlands were reduced to almost
Page 2: University of Wisconsin–Madisonimages.library.wisc.edu/EcoNatRes/EFacs/Wetlands/...Agr icul tural areas increased sl ightly, to 17%, while freshwater wetlands were reduced to almost
Page 3: University of Wisconsin–Madisonimages.library.wisc.edu/EcoNatRes/EFacs/Wetlands/...Agr icul tural areas increased sl ightly, to 17%, while freshwater wetlands were reduced to almost
Page 4: University of Wisconsin–Madisonimages.library.wisc.edu/EcoNatRes/EFacs/Wetlands/...Agr icul tural areas increased sl ightly, to 17%, while freshwater wetlands were reduced to almost
Page 5: University of Wisconsin–Madisonimages.library.wisc.edu/EcoNatRes/EFacs/Wetlands/...Agr icul tural areas increased sl ightly, to 17%, while freshwater wetlands were reduced to almost
Page 6: University of Wisconsin–Madisonimages.library.wisc.edu/EcoNatRes/EFacs/Wetlands/...Agr icul tural areas increased sl ightly, to 17%, while freshwater wetlands were reduced to almost
Page 7: University of Wisconsin–Madisonimages.library.wisc.edu/EcoNatRes/EFacs/Wetlands/...Agr icul tural areas increased sl ightly, to 17%, while freshwater wetlands were reduced to almost
Page 8: University of Wisconsin–Madisonimages.library.wisc.edu/EcoNatRes/EFacs/Wetlands/...Agr icul tural areas increased sl ightly, to 17%, while freshwater wetlands were reduced to almost
Page 9: University of Wisconsin–Madisonimages.library.wisc.edu/EcoNatRes/EFacs/Wetlands/...Agr icul tural areas increased sl ightly, to 17%, while freshwater wetlands were reduced to almost
Page 10: University of Wisconsin–Madisonimages.library.wisc.edu/EcoNatRes/EFacs/Wetlands/...Agr icul tural areas increased sl ightly, to 17%, while freshwater wetlands were reduced to almost
Page 11: University of Wisconsin–Madisonimages.library.wisc.edu/EcoNatRes/EFacs/Wetlands/...Agr icul tural areas increased sl ightly, to 17%, while freshwater wetlands were reduced to almost
Page 12: University of Wisconsin–Madisonimages.library.wisc.edu/EcoNatRes/EFacs/Wetlands/...Agr icul tural areas increased sl ightly, to 17%, while freshwater wetlands were reduced to almost
Page 13: University of Wisconsin–Madisonimages.library.wisc.edu/EcoNatRes/EFacs/Wetlands/...Agr icul tural areas increased sl ightly, to 17%, while freshwater wetlands were reduced to almost
Page 14: University of Wisconsin–Madisonimages.library.wisc.edu/EcoNatRes/EFacs/Wetlands/...Agr icul tural areas increased sl ightly, to 17%, while freshwater wetlands were reduced to almost
Page 15: University of Wisconsin–Madisonimages.library.wisc.edu/EcoNatRes/EFacs/Wetlands/...Agr icul tural areas increased sl ightly, to 17%, while freshwater wetlands were reduced to almost
Page 16: University of Wisconsin–Madisonimages.library.wisc.edu/EcoNatRes/EFacs/Wetlands/...Agr icul tural areas increased sl ightly, to 17%, while freshwater wetlands were reduced to almost
Page 17: University of Wisconsin–Madisonimages.library.wisc.edu/EcoNatRes/EFacs/Wetlands/...Agr icul tural areas increased sl ightly, to 17%, while freshwater wetlands were reduced to almost
Page 18: University of Wisconsin–Madisonimages.library.wisc.edu/EcoNatRes/EFacs/Wetlands/...Agr icul tural areas increased sl ightly, to 17%, while freshwater wetlands were reduced to almost
Page 19: University of Wisconsin–Madisonimages.library.wisc.edu/EcoNatRes/EFacs/Wetlands/...Agr icul tural areas increased sl ightly, to 17%, while freshwater wetlands were reduced to almost
Page 20: University of Wisconsin–Madisonimages.library.wisc.edu/EcoNatRes/EFacs/Wetlands/...Agr icul tural areas increased sl ightly, to 17%, while freshwater wetlands were reduced to almost