University of West Florida
-
Upload
lisandra-lambert -
Category
Documents
-
view
40 -
download
0
description
Transcript of University of West Florida
1
University of West Florida
Key Performance IndicatorsBoard of Trustees
Ground Rules
1. Focus on important issues – What is top of mind for the campus and its leadership?
2. Remember the audience – These indicators will be used primarily by the board and senior management.
3. Impact decision making – If you knew this data, would it lead you to make different decisions?
Ground Rules
4. Understandable – Each Key Performance Indicator should be quickly intuitive.
5. Come from available data – To the greatest extent possible, KPIs should be pulled from existing data and analysis sources.
6. Must have trend, benchmark, and target – Accountability requires that the institutional data be compared to the peer group and that the institution establish targets for each indicator.
7. Few in number – In selecting KPIs, less is more.
4
Peer Institutions
• Indiana State University • East Tennessee State University • Rowan University • Stephen F Austin State University • University of Arkansas at Little Rock • University of Massachusetts-Lowell • University of South Dakota • University of West Georgia • Valdosta State University • Western Carolina University
5
Aspirant Institutions
• Appalachian State University • Georgia Southern University • Indiana University of Pennsylvania • James Madison University • Montclair State University • Saint Cloud State University
UWF Organization – Scorecard Approach
• Quality• Effectiveness and Efficiency• People• Resources
7
Parameters
• UWF - 5 Year Trend Data• Majority of Benchmarks– Enrollment, People and Retention Data – Fall 2010– Financial and Graduation Data – Fiscal Year 2009-2010
• Targets– 1 year – Fiscal Year 2012-2013– 5 year – Fiscal Year 2015-2016
• Additional drill downs on each indicator will ultimately be available
8
Total Headcount and Full Time Equivalent (FTE)
9,819
11,59912,231
18,087
12,400
14,000
8,149
9,712 10,223
16,046
10,292 11,600
5,000
7,000
9,000
11,000
13,000
15,000
17,000
19,000
UWF Fall 2006/FY 2007
UWF Fall 2010/FY 2011
Peer Aspirant FY 2013 Target FY2016 Target
Fall Headcount
Annualized FTE
Peer/Aspirant:
HC: Fall 2010FTE: FY 2010
UWF is growing, but still smaller than the comparison groups
9
SAT and ACT Scores
10221028
10351040
1056
1017
1063 1066
1081
980
1000
1020
1040
1060
1080
1100
Fall 2006 Fall 2007 Fall 2008 Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Peer- Fall 2010
Aspirant-Fall 2010
Fall 2012 Target
Fall 2015 Target
SAT S
core
SAT Score for Entering Freshmen
22.83 22.74 22.9723.22
23.49
20.5
23
24
25
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Fall 2006 Fall 2007 Fall 2008 Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Peer- Fall 2010
Aspirant-Fall 2010
Fall 2012 Target
Fall 2015 Target
ACT S
core
ACT of Entering Freshmen
The quality of our students continues to increase, and approaches or exceeds the comparison groups
10
Average High School GPA
3.30 3.30
3.31
3.28 3.33
3.20
3.50
3.40
3.52
3.00
3.10
3.20
3.30
3.40
3.50
3.60
Fall 2006 Fall 2007 Fall 2008 Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Peer- Fall 2010
Aspirant-Fall 2010
Fall 2012 Target
Fall 2015 Target
HS G
PA
Student success in high school is stable, but not as strong as the aspirant group
11
Applications Received
3,071 3,371 4,149 4,513 5,013
7,280
12,374
6,000
10,000
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
Fall 2006 Fall 2007 Fall 2008 Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Peer- Fall 2010 Aspirant- Fall 2010
Fall 2012 Target
Fall 2015 Target
FTIC
and D
ual E
nroll
ed
More students are interested in attending UWF
12
Undergraduate Acceptance and Yield Rates
71.75%70.27% 69.00%
69.88%
67.26%
70.%
62%
50%
55%
60%
65%
70%
75%
Fall 2006 Fall 2007 Fall 2008 Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Peer- Fall 2010
Aspirant- Fall 2010
FTIC A
ccepta
nce
Undergraduate Acceptance
44.05% 43.48%
38.14%38.87%
37.10%
43%42%
32%
34%
36%
38%
40%
42%
44%
46%
Fall 2006 Fall 2007 Fall 2008 Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Peer- Fall 2010 Aspirant- Fall 2010
Yield Rate
Selectivity is increasing, but a declining percentage choose to come (though enrollment is increasing)
13
Undergraduate Retention Rates
74.30%
73.00%
71.10%
78.80%
72.80%
71%
81%
66%
68%
70%
72%
74%
76%
78%
80%
82%
Fall 2006 Fall 2007 Fall 2008 Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Peer- Fall 2010
Aspirant-Fall 2010
Fa
ll t
o F
all
: F
resh
me
n t
o S
op
ho
mo
re
Retention rates exceed peer group levels, but need to improve
Undergraduate Graduation Rates
14
41.81%
48.49%
44.21%45.34%
47.38%
44%
59%
46%
49%
40%
42%
44%
46%
48%
50%
52%
54%
56%
58%
60%
FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Peer- FY 2010
Aspirant -FY 2010
FY 2013 Target
FY 2016 Target
% of fir
st time
/full ti
me un
dergra
duates
gra
duating
Graduation Rate: 6 Year
22.63%
20.71%19.56%
21.03% 21.51% 22%
34%
22%23%
15%
17%
19%
21%
23%
25%
27%
29%
31%
33%
35%
FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Peer- FY 2010
Aspirant - FY 2010
FY 2013 Target
FY 2016 Target
% of fir
st time
/full ti
me un
dergra
duates
gra
duatin
g
Graduation Rate: 4 Year
Graduation rates need to improve
15
Degrees Awarded: Total and STEM
281 313 344 368 369 267 302 380 415
2,3132,482 2,524 2,430 2,559
2,399
3,611
2,6102,825
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Peer- FY 2010
Aspirant-FY 2010
FY 2013 Target
FY 2016 Target
STEM
Total
Degree production is strong
16
Student Engagement
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65Se
nio
r Su
rve
y R
esu
lts
FY 2007
FY 2011
Peer- FY 2011
Aspirant-FY 2011
Student engagement is stable or improving, but often falls below comparison groups
17
Median Starting Salary
$36,100
$35,200
$37,800
$38,922
$40,133
$32,000
$33,000
$34,000
$35,000
$36,000
$37,000
$38,000
$39,000
$40,000
$41,000
FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Peer - FY 2011 Aspirant- FY 2011
Me
dia
n S
tarti
ng
Sa
lary
The median starting salary of UWF graduates is increasing but lags behind the comparison groups.
18
Faculty, Staff and Student Diversity
21.84%
21.88%
17.70%
21.50%
54.74%
54.80%
53.70%
54.40%
0% 15% 30% 45% 60%
Fall 2006
Fall 2010
Peer- Fall 2010
Aspirant- Fall 2010
Faculty/Staff Diversity: Race and Gender
23.77%
25.32%
30.00%
26.00%
60.39%
59.06%
57.00%
56.00%
0% 15% 30% 45% 60%
Fall 2006
Fall 2010
Peer- Fall 2010
Aspirant-Fall 2010
Student Diversity: Race and Gender
Gender: Female
Race: Minority
Diversity is stable or increasing
19
Affordability
$3,351 $3,467 $3,655 $4,210
$4,794
$7,193 $7,116
$-
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
$8,000
Fall 2006 Fall 2007 Fall 2008 Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Peer- Fall 2010
Aspirant-Fall 2010
Tuition
and F
ees
Price of Mandatory Tuition and Fees
38%
39% 39%
41%
42%
36%
37%
38%
39%
40%
41%
42%
43%
FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011
Perce
nt of
stude
nts wh
ose re
source
s me
et or
excee
d tuiti
on an
d fee
s
% of Students with No Unmet Needs
A UWF education remains affordable
20
Ratio of FTE Students to FTE Faculty
18.019.0
23.0
22.0
23.0
17.8
19.5
14.015.016.017.018.019.020.021.022.023.024.0
Fall 2006 Fall 2007 Fall 2008 Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Peer- Fall 2010 Aspirant- Fall 2010
Instruction is being delivered more efficiently
21
Average Undergraduate Class Size
23.27
25.4826.84 27.63 28.10
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Fall 2006 Fall 2007 Fall 2008 Fall 2009 Fall 2010
Stude
nts in
Class
As the University has grown, so have class sizes
22
Faculty and Staff Turnover
7.8%
12.0%
6.1%
7.0%
5.8%
8.2%9.3%
7.9% 8.5%
9.3%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
Turn
over
%
Faculty Turnover
Staff Turnover
Turnover of faculty and staff is stable or declining
23
Revenue by Source
46.7% 40.7% 38.8% 35.7%
15.9% 23.5% 29.6% 38.8%
20.4%27.3% 18.4%
14.3%
17.0%8.5% 13.3% 11.2%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
FY 2007 FY 2010 Peer- FY 2009 Aspirant- FY 2009
Other Core Revenues
Gov't Grants and Contracts
Tuition and Fees
State
State funding is being replaced by other revenue sources
24
Revenue per Full Time Equivalent (FTE)
$17,002
$17,008
$15,877 $16,369
$20,256
$18,501
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
$16,000
$18,000
$20,000
$22,000
FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 Peer- FY 2010
Aspirant- FY 2010
Re
ve
nu
e p
er F
TE
Comparison groups have more resources to work with
25
Total Cost per Full Time Equivalent (FTE)
$17,607
$17,099
$16,565
$17,339
$19,246
$17,344
$15,000
$15,500
$16,000
$16,500
$17,000
$17,500
$18,000
$18,500
$19,000
$19,500
FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 Peer- FY 2010 Aspirant- FY 2010
Tota
l Cos
t per
FTE
UWF is more cost effective than the comparison groups
Total Giving
5 Year Cumulative arget = $21M
* Total giving without gifts to the Maritime Museum Project** FY2011 unaudited total; Peer & Aspirant not yet reported
$-
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
$12,000,000
FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2013 Target
Actual (without MM)
Peer
Aspirant
FY 2016 Target:$21m cummulative
The economy has negatively impacted giving to the Institution
27
Faculty Salaries
$61,008 $63,244 $67,738
$74,553
$-
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
$80,000
FY 2007 FY 2011 Peer - FY 2011 Aspirant- FY 2011
9 m
onth
equ
ated
sal
arie
s
Faculty salaries are improving, but lag behind the comparison groups
28
Research
162 166
92 99108
218199
144 138 157 155169
0
50
100
150
200
250
Numb
er of
propo
sals a
nd aw
ards
Number of Research, Grant and Contracts
# Awarded
# of Proposals $17.42 $14.22 $13.69 $16.68 $19.16 $19.60 $21.30
$46.89 $39.81 $38.30
$71.95
$50.21
$-
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
$80
Dollars
(in mi
llions)
Amount of Research, Grants and Contracts
$ Awarded (in millions)
$ of Proposals (in millions)
Research activity continues to grow