University of Nottingham WinSET Debate
26
University of Nottingham WinSET Debate 3 July 2013
description
University of Nottingham WinSET Debate. 3 July 2013. So called, scissors diagrams are often used to illustrate the “leaky pipeline” for women along a career pathway. HE career progression at UK HE institutions by gender, Maths 2007/08. Data source: HESA (2008). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transcript of University of Nottingham WinSET Debate
University of Nottingham
WinSET Debate
3 July 2013
• So called, scissors diagrams are often used to illustrate the “leaky pipeline” for women along a career pathway
HE career progression at UK HE institutions by gender, Maths 2007/08
Data source: HESA (2008)
Pipeline: Progression in physics by gender, 2007/08
Data source: HESA (2008)
• Two key issues are recruitment into a subject at UG level and subsequent retention of those students into the profession
• A crude measure of the leakage of women along the higher education pipeline is the ratio of the proportion of UGs who are female and the proportion of professors who are female
Pipeline: Progression in physics by gender, 2007/08 [UG(%F):P(%F) ~ 4:1]
Data source: HESA (2008)
Pipeline: progression in biology by gender 2007/08 [UG(%F):P(%F) ~ 3.5:1]
Data source: HESA (2008)
HE career progression at UK HE institutions by gender, Maths 2007/08 [UG(%F):P(%F) ~ 9:1]
Data source: HESA (2008)
Pipeline: progression in chemistry by gender, 2007/08 [UG(%F):P(%F) ~ 7.5:1]
Data source: HESA (2008)
Pipeline: progression in clinical medicine by gender 2010/11 [UG(%F):P(%F) ~ 2.5:1]
Data source: HESA (2008)
Chemistry data used for GCSE and A Level
Pipeline: progression in psychology by gender, 2011/12 [UG(%F):P(%F) ~ 2.5:1]
Data source: HESA (2008)
• Perhaps the so-called “leaky pipeline” is just a reflection of times when smaller proportion of women read science
• Perhaps women just choose to leave academia
• Examining the proportions of male and female permanent academic staff who are professors, respectively, in particular age bands provides a comparison of the likelihood of men and women being professors, irrespective of the make up or history of the cohort
Proportion permanent academic staff who are professors by age (all cost centres)
Data source: HESA (2012)
3.6%
19.4%
28.0%
1.0%
6.4%
11.1%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
31-40 41-50 51-60
Age
Male Female
Proportion permanent academic staff who are professors by age (physics)
Data source: HESA (2012)
7.6%
47.6%
62.4%
4.9%
22.8%
36.2%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
31-40 41-50 51-60
Age
Male Female
Proportion permanent academic staff who are professors by age (chemistry)
Data source: HESA (2012)
8.6%
35.8%
48.8%
2.6%
13.1%
25.8%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
31-40 41-50 51-60
Age
Male Female
Proportion permanent academic staff who are professors by age (mathematics)
Data source: HESA (2010)
6.8%
35.0%
49.6%
2.9%
12.0% 11.6%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
31-40 41-50 51-60
Age
Male Female
• Nationally, a significant proportion of mathematics staff are classified as “teaching-only”. Women are more likely to be in teaching-only positions than men. Examining the mathematics staff data excluding teaching-only staff give a different picture, albeit women are still less likely than men to be professors
Proportion permanent academic staff who are professors by age (mathematics: without teaching-only staff)
Data source: HESA (2012)
8.0%
39.5%
60.2%
4.5%
17.1%
27.0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
31-40 41-50 51-60
Age
Male Female
Proportion permanent academic staff who are professors by age (biosciences)
Data source: HESA (2012)
4.6%
26.7%
44.1%
0.1%
9.7%
22.0%
0%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%
31-40 41-50 51-60
Age
Male Female
Proportion permanent academic staff who are professors by age (psychology)
Data source: HESA (2012)
5.9%
17.9%
35.1%
1.4%
6.0%
14.6%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
31-40 41-50 51-60
Age
Male Female
Proportion permanent academic staff who are professors by age (Nursing & Paramedical Studies)
Data source: HESA (2012)
2.1%
6.1%
7.9%
0.5%
2.6%
4.7%
0%1%2%3%4%5%6%7%8%9%
31-40 41-50 51-60
Age
Male Female
• In only one cost centre women more likely to be professors than men, chemical engineering
Proportion permanent academic staff who are professors by age (chemical engineering)
Data source: HESA (2012)
6.4%
30.0%
55.2%
10.0%
20.1%
65.8%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
31-40 41-50 51-60
Age
Male Female
• In every subject bar one, men are more likely to be professors than women, often significantly so
• The biggest disparities are in materials and mathematics
• If you are male and want to be a professor, study physics
• If you are female and want to be a professor, study chemical engineering
