University of Iowa and Ohio state behavioural Theories Ryan (Swag) Finley Aaron (Bleezy) Brooks...

8
University of Iowa and Ohio state behavioural Theories Ryan (Swag) Finley Aaron (Bleezy) Brooks Haley Zinn #Ben Nickerson

Transcript of University of Iowa and Ohio state behavioural Theories Ryan (Swag) Finley Aaron (Bleezy) Brooks...

Page 1: University of Iowa and Ohio state behavioural Theories Ryan (Swag) Finley Aaron (Bleezy) Brooks Haley Zinn #Ben Nickerson.

University of Iowa and Ohio state

behavioural TheoriesRyan (Swag) Finley

Aaron (Bleezy) Brooks Haley Zinn

#Ben Nickerson

Page 2: University of Iowa and Ohio state behavioural Theories Ryan (Swag) Finley Aaron (Bleezy) Brooks Haley Zinn #Ben Nickerson.

Behavioural Theories

Leadership theories that identify behaviours that differentiate effective leaders for

ineffective leaders.

Page 3: University of Iowa and Ohio state behavioural Theories Ryan (Swag) Finley Aaron (Bleezy) Brooks Haley Zinn #Ben Nickerson.

The University of Iowa

The university of Iowa studies explored 3

Leadership styles;

• Autocratic style

• Democratic style

• Laissez-faire style

Page 4: University of Iowa and Ohio state behavioural Theories Ryan (Swag) Finley Aaron (Bleezy) Brooks Haley Zinn #Ben Nickerson.

Lewin and the boys

Lewin and his associates researched which one of the leadership styles were

most effective.

Their results seemed to indicate that the democratic style contributed to both

good quantity and quality of work.

Page 5: University of Iowa and Ohio state behavioural Theories Ryan (Swag) Finley Aaron (Bleezy) Brooks Haley Zinn #Ben Nickerson.

Further Results

The earlier test results proved that democratic style showed higher

performance levels than autocratic style, but other tests proved that lower or equal

performance levels were produced by democratic style.

Page 6: University of Iowa and Ohio state behavioural Theories Ryan (Swag) Finley Aaron (Bleezy) Brooks Haley Zinn #Ben Nickerson.

The University of Ohio

It began with over 1,000 behavioural dimensions, and researchers were able to narrow it down to 2 categories;

• Consideration

• Initiating structure

Page 7: University of Iowa and Ohio state behavioural Theories Ryan (Swag) Finley Aaron (Bleezy) Brooks Haley Zinn #Ben Nickerson.

Definitions

• Initiating Structure: The extent to which a leader is likely to define and structure his or her role and the roles of group members in the search for goal attainment.

• Consideration: The extent to which a leader has job relationships characterized by mutual trust and respect for group members’ ideas and feelings.

Page 8: University of Iowa and Ohio state behavioural Theories Ryan (Swag) Finley Aaron (Bleezy) Brooks Haley Zinn #Ben Nickerson.

Leaders who are high in both initiating structure and consideration behaviours are

considered high-high leaders.

High-high leaders achieved high group task performance and satisfaction more

frequently.