University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R....

38
Portfolio Workshop University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University

Transcript of University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R....

Page 1: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

Portfolio Workshop

University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference

R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University

Page 2: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

Objectives In this session, I want to cover some of the academic scholarship and teaching

subjects that comprise part of the finance discipline and show how I use Bloomberg in these areas.

I will draw from some of the Bloomberg exercises that are in Debt Markets and Analysis (Wiley) and in a forthcoming book, Equity Markets and Portfolio Analysis (Wiley).

I want to put some emphasis on portfolio analysis. Intent here is to show the breadth and debt of Bloomberg, as well as some of the

subtleties.

At the end, I hope to engage you in a discussion on how Bloomberg can be used in teaching finance and also in facilitating academic scholarship and research in finance.

2

Page 3: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

Finance Subjects • Stock Fundamental Analysis • Portfolio Parameters • Portfolio Theory, CAPM, and APT • Equity Style Investment • ETF Construction • Bond Evaluation

Total return analysis Equilibrium Bond Prices Level and Structure of interest rates Yield curve Bond spreads and risk

• Bond Portfolio Construction and Horizon Analysis • Swaps and “Off-balance Sheet” Portfolio Management • Derivatives • Research 3

Page 4: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

Fundamental stock analysis • Multiplier (P/e) valuation model

• Relative evaluation of a stock’s growth rates and its

capitalization rate in terms of risk premium measures

• Model for estimating earnings-per-share

• Methods for estimating P/e

• Comparison of P/e with sector and market indexes.

4

Page 5: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

Risk Premium Analysis

Financial Risk: Debt-to-earnings and debt-to-asset ratios

5

Page 6: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

Stock

Analysis

Analysis of growth rates, risk premiums, and relative P/e ratios to determine the stock’s equilibrium P/e.

6

• Inputs: Bloomberg’s sustainable growth rate = 4.4%; D/E = 0.5; Adjusted Beta = .708; expected market return = 9.5%; risk-free rate = 1.6%; discount rate = k = 7.2%.

86.17=044.-072.

50.=

g-kE/D

=EP 11

Page 7: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

Stock

Analysis

Forecast of the company’s eps. Excel multiplier

program linked to Bloomberg.

Comparison of forecast with analysts’ forecast (Bloomberg ANR and EE).

7

Page 8: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

Stock

Analysis

8

3/31/2011 6/30/2011 9/30/2011 12/31/2011 3/31/2012 6/30/2012 Trailing Next FQ1 2011 FQ2 2011 FQ3 2011 FQ4 2011 FQ1 2012 FQ2 2012 Four Quarters Full Year

12,573 13,878 13,226 14,688 13,093 13,286 54,293 53,207 -8.71% 10.38% -4.70% 11.05% -10.86% 1.47% 4.24% -2.00% 7,937 9,007 8,611 9,795 8,426 8,416 35,248 34,543

-11.57% 13.48% -4.40% 13.75% -13.98% -0.12% 5.34% -2.00% 63.13% 64.90% 65.11% 66.69% 64.36% 63.34% 64.92% 64.92%

2,990 3,065 2,924 3,386 2,878 2,907 12,095 11,805 -15.18% 2.51% -4.60% 15.80% -15.00% 1.01% -2.39% -2.40% 23.78% 22.09% 22.11% 23.05% 21.98% 21.88% 22.28% 22.19%

1,646 1,806 1,691 1,507 1,789 1,963 6,950 6,859 13.09% 13.01% 12.79% 10.26% 13.66% 14.78% 12.80% 12.89%

462 441 425 317 568 445 1,755 1,720 -13.64% -4.55% -3.63% -25.41% 79.18% -21.65% -6.20% -2.00%

- - - - - - - - (16) - (7) 256 83 68 400 -

1,200 1,365 1,273 934 1,138 1,450 4,795 5,139 398 389 346 92 319 416 1,173 -

33.17% 28.50% 27.18% 9.85% 28.03% 28.69% 24.46% 0.00% 802 976 927 842 819 1,034 3,622 5,139 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

3 - 5 12 6 5 28 - 799 976 922 830 813 1,029 3,594 5,139

0.46 0.55 0.52 0.47 0.46 0.58 2.03 2.89

Revenue Sales Growth Cost of Goods Sold (Revenue) % ? in COGS COGS/Revenue Selling, General & Administrative Expense % ? in S,G,&A S,G,&A/Revenue Operating Income Operating Margin Interest Expense % ? in Interest Foreign Exchange Loss (G) Net Non-Operating Loss (G) Pretax Income Income Tax Expense Effective Tax Rate Income Before XO Items XO Loss (Gain) Pretax Tax Effect on XO Items Minority Interest Net Income EPS Number of Shares

Page 9: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

Stock

Analysis

Analysts’ forecast: Bloomberg ANR and EE

9

Page 10: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

Stock Analysis

Determine the stock’s intrinsic value: V = (P/e)(E(eps). Determine if the stock is underpriced or overpriced.

10

•P/E for Kraft: •Historical P/e = 16.73 •Recent P/e = 17.7 •Based on our estimated EPS of $2.89, the intrinsic values are:

•V = (16.73)($2.89) = $48.35 •V = (17.7)($2.89) = $51.15 •V = (17.86)($2.89) = $51.62

•Market Price = $41

•IV > PMkt

•Strong Buy

• Analysts’ estimate of EPS = $2.48 •V = (16.73)($2.48) = $41.49 •V = (17.7)($2.48) = $43.90 •V = (17.86)($2.49) = $44.47

•Market Price = $41

•IV > PMkt

•Weak Buy

Page 11: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

Portfolio Parameters

Linear regressions for the Disney Corporation and General Electric

Both regressions were done on Bloomberg’s “Beta” screen.

In each regression, the stock’s daily percentage returns are regressed against the percentage changes in the S&P 500 (SPX) for the period from 5/1/06 to 4/28/11.

The Beta screen shows the scatter diagram, regression estimates, and qualifiers.

From this regression, Disney has a beta 1.067, alpha of .040, σ(ε) of 1.193 (V(ε) = 1.42325), t-statistic = β/ σ(β) = 50.04, and R2 of .6667.

GE has a beta 1.158, alpha of –.029, σ(ε) of 1.663 (V(ε) = 2.7656), t-statistic = β/ σ(β) = 38.941, and R2 of .547.

11

Page 12: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

Portfolio Parameters

PC Screen

The Bloomberg’s PC screen for GE compares

the R2’s, Betas, and alphas for GE and related companies in its industry.

Based on its R2, approximately 50% of GE’s variability is explained by market factors.

GE’s beta of 1.254 exceeds the beta of most of its peers, with the exception being Caterpillar and Abbot Labs.

GE is only one of two in the peer group with a negative alpha for the regression period analyzed.

12

Page 13: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

Portfolio Parameters, PC Screen

On the PC screen, the

Alphas and betas for each stock for the time period selected can be accessed from the “Calculation” tab and exported to Excel from the “Export” tab (upper right corner).

Each stock’s variance of the error, V(ε), can be calculated from the sock’s R2 and its variance (V(r) (V(ε) = V(r) (1 − R2)) using the stock variances, found by clicking “Covariance” in the “Calculation” tab, and R2’s found by clicking “R2” in the “Calculation” tab.

13

Security Alpha Beta V(ri) R2 V(εi) = V(ri) (1 − R2)

WALT DISNEY 0.693 1.155 27.183 0.687 8.508

CVS CAREMARK CORP 0.592 0.786 18.498 0.366 11.728

KROGER CO 0.560 0.467 10.980 0.163 9.190

AFLAC INC 0.367 1.741 40.954 0.521 19.617

JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.290 0.576 13.548 0.425 7.790

DUKE ENERGY CORP 0.288 0.362 8.520 0.202 6.799

EXXON MOBIL CORP 0.273 0.543 12.768 0.307 8.848

PROCTER & GAMBLE 0.216 0.459 10.797 0.251 8.087

MICROSOFT CORP 0.100 1.000 23.520 0.429 13.430

ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND 0.028 0.421 9.909 0.057 9.344

S&P 500 INDEX 0.000 1.000 23.527 1.000 0.000

Data imported to Excel from PC

Monthly Data Period: 8/13/2006-8/13/2013

Page 14: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

Portfolio

Parameters, CORR Screen

14

A B C D E F G H I J K L M1 Security ADM AFL CVS DIS DUK JNJ KR MSFT PG XOM

2 ADM 20.196 9.934 3.544 8.107 4.019 4.302 4.729 3.963 3.704 7.784 0.305 0.53 AFL 9.934 36.156 6.196 14.156 7.065 6.165 5.717 9.161 5.948 8.274 6.805 0.54 CVS 3.544 6.196 11.732 5.032 3.182 1.918 3.318 4.012 2.137 3.883 8.455 0.55 DIS 8.107 14.156 5.032 14.588 4.8 4.761 4.537 6.853 5.07 7.048 9.890 0.56 DUK 4.019 7.065 3.182 4.8 6.893 3.398 3.205 3.987 3.003 4.069 3.785 0.57 JNJ 4.302 6.165 1.918 4.761 3.398 4.956 3.336 3.631 3.089 3.645 4.535 0.58 KR 4.729 5.717 3.318 4.537 3.205 3.336 11.191 3.761 3.034 4.07 7.885 0.59 MSFT 3.963 9.161 4.012 6.853 3.987 3.631 3.761 14.154 3.256 5.512 3.505 0.5

10 PG 3.704 5.948 2.137 5.07 3.003 3.089 3.034 3.256 5.804 3.597 3.495 0.511 XOM 7.784 8.274 3.883 7.048 4.069 3.645 4.07 5.512 3.597 9.418 2.590 0.512 0.610 13.610 16.910 19.780 7.570 9.070 15.770 7.010 6.990 5.180 0 013 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 01415 0.067012 -0.00553 0.012222 0.015548 -0.00541 -0.01789 0.007721 0.004388 -0.013705386 -0.064 -0.01632 0.13865316 -0.00553 0.046287 0.002585 -0.03075 -0.0123 0.001258 0.003457 -0.00746 0.002631718 -2E-04 -0.00205 -0.0579217 0.012222 0.002585 0.091248 -0.04336 -0.02618 -0.00096 -0.03186 -0.00355 0.003847209 -0.004 0.01559 0.0370418 A-1 0.015548 -0.03075 -0.04336 0.085151 0.025771 -0.03156 -0.03413 0.004424 0.005667658 0.0032 0.04174 -0.4407919 -0.00541 -0.0123 -0.02618 0.025771 0.249286 -0.1127 -0.00139 -0.01795 -0.055224029 -0.044 -0.0099 0.22831520 -0.01789 0.001258 -0.00096 -0.03156 -0.1127 0.386061 -0.05473 -0.02586 -0.124769043 -0.019 0.00605 0.36665721 0.007721 0.003457 -0.03186 -0.03413 -0.00139 -0.05473 0.102875 0.004441 -0.001792773 0.0054 0.02018 -0.1115122 0.004388 -0.00746 -0.00355 0.004424 -0.01795 -0.02586 0.004441 0.100509 -0.015192645 -0.044 -0.01116 0.12992223 -0.01371 0.002632 0.003847 0.005668 -0.05522 -0.12477 -0.00179 -0.01519 0.24940909 -0.051 -0.02365 0.5050624 -0.06436 -0.00018 -0.004 0.003244 -0.04389 -0.01885 0.005407 -0.04375 -0.050871799 0.2172 -0.02048 0.20457525 -0.03265 -0.00409 0.031186 0.083477 -0.0198 0.012103 0.040365 -0.02233 -0.04730571 -0.041 -0.04424 0.35884726 0.277306 -0.11584 0.07408 -0.88159 0.45663 0.733313 -0.22301 0.259844 1.010119194 0.4092 0.35885 -9.6754527 k W W W Cov28 0 -0.11436 w1 ADM 2.156376

29 0 -0.08965 w2 AFL 4.281346

30 0 0.278733 w3 CVS 4.820762

31 0 0.206157 w4 DIS 5.28989 W/ (W cov) = 4.5903 V(Rp)

32 0 0.074859 w5 DUK 3.294052

33 0 0.460455 = w6 JNJ 3.539241

34 0 0.201318 w7 KR 4.634418

35 0 -0.04313 w8 MSFT 3.202515

36 0 0.13844 w9 PG 3.199246

37 0 -0.11282 w10 XOM 2.903384

38 Ep* 15.5 -0.32692 λ1

39 1 -4.11333 λ2

4041 W/ -0.11436 -0.08965 0.278733 0.206157 0.074859 0.460455 0.201318 -0.04313 0.138440345 -0.113

Page 15: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

Markowitz Efficient Portfolios Using the Bloomberg Asset Allocation Optimizer

15

This application requires Excel's Solver Add-in to be installed. Go to Help tab for directions. You may also contact Bloomberg Help Desk.Asset Allocation Optimizer uses either historical returns or user-customized forecasted returns to generate optimal portfolios. Follow directions on the left side of the screen to start using the application. You may customize start and end dates for historical return, standard deviation, and corre

1) Enter Tickers ----> Tickers: Adm Equity AFL Equity CVS Equity Dis Equity Duk Equity JNJ Equity KR Equity MSFT Equity PG Equity XOM Equity

2) Enter Asset Class ----> Asset Class: ADM AFL CVS Dis Duke J&J Kroger Microsoft PG Exxon

ARCHER-DANIELS-

AFLAC INC CVS CAREMARK

WALT DISNEY CO/THE

DUKE ENERGY CORP

JOHNSON & JOHNSON

KROGER CO MICROSOFT CORP

PROCTER & GAMBLE

EXXON MOBIL CORP

3) Choose Return Type Returns * 0.61% 13.61% 16.91% 19.78% 7.57% 9.07% 15.77% 7.01% 6.99% 5.18%

Type 1: Standard Dev 32.5% 43.3% 24.7% 27.6% 18.5% 15.9% 24.2% 27.1% 17.3% 22.1%* For demonstration only; these are not recommendations; please review your inputs carefully.

ARCHER-DANIELS-

AFLAC INCCVS

CAREMARK WALT DISNEY

CO/THEDUKE ENERGY

CORPJOHNSON &

JOHNSONKROGER CO

MICROSOFT CORP

PROCTER & GAMBLE

EXXON MOBIL CORP

ARCHER-DANIELS

1.000

AFLAC INC 0.366 1.000

CVS CAREMARK CORP

0.231 0.300 1.000

WALT DISNEY CO/THE

0.471 0.615 0.389 1.000

DUKE ENERGY 0.347 0.438 0.357 0.481 1.000

4) Enter Dates Below JOHNSON & 0.431 0.458 0.254 0.560 0.589 1.000

Start Date: 8/5/2006 KROGER CO 0.314 0.279 0.290 0.350 0.369 0.444 1.000

End Date: 8/8/2013 MICROSOFT 0.233 0.400 0.311 0.477 0.401 0.433 0.298 1.000

PROCTER & GAMBLE

0.350 0.414 0.263 0.555 0.496 0.585 0.381 0.365 1.000

EXXON MOBIL CORP

0.564 0.444 0.374 0.604 0.506 0.542 0.395 0.478 0.498 1.000

5) Review Constraints ----> Min Weight 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Constraints Kept Max Weight 99.0% 99.0% 99.0% 99.0% 99.0% 99.0% 99.0% 99.0% 99.0% 99.0%

6) Press Button - Optimize Objective 1: Portfolio that minimizes risk Risk Free Return: 1.50% Return: 9.80% Standard Dev: 13.8%

Weights 0.0% 0.0% 14.6% 0.0% 13.9% 38.6% 5.4% 0.2% 27.3% 0.0%

Objective 2: Portfolio that maximizes return Risk Free Return: 1.50% Return: 19.75% Standard Dev: 27.4%

Weights 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 99.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Objective 3: Portfolio that maximizes Sharpe Ratio Risk Free Return: 1.50% Return: 17.47% Standard Dev: 19.1%

Weights 0.0% 0.0% 33.9% 33.1% 0.0% 0.3% 32.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Objective 4: Portfolio that maximizes return (*given a volatility) Risk Free Return: 2.50% Return: 15.53% Standard Dev: 17.0%

Weights 0.0% 0.0% 31.1% 21.4% 0.0% 21.6% 26.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Objective 5: Portfolio that minimizes risk (*given a return) Risk Free Return: 2.50% Return: 15.50% Standard Dev: 17.0%

Weights 0.0% 0.0% 30.7% 21.4% 0.0% 22.0% 25.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Type 2:

You have chosen forecasted rates. Please go to the

Forecasted Rates Tab to review your return

assumptions.

Historical returns, correlations and standard

deviations will update according to dates chosen.

Asset Allocation Optimizer

Historical

Forecasted

Page 16: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

Markowitz Efficient Portfolios Using the Bloomberg Asset Allocation Optimizer

16

Risk Return ADM AFL CVS Dis Duke J&J Kroger Microsoft PG Exxon

13.8% 9.8% 0.0% 0.0% 14.6% 0.0% 13.9% 38.6% 5.4% 0.2% 27.3% 0.0%

13.9% 10.5% 0.0% 0.0% 18.3% 0.0% 10.2% 39.5% 9.2% 0.0% 22.8% 0.0%

14.1% 11.2% 0.0% 0.0% 22.2% 0.0% 6.4% 39.5% 13.1% 0.0% 18.8% 0.0%

14.4% 11.9% 0.0% 0.0% 24.4% 2.5% 4.2% 38.4% 15.3% 0.0% 15.1% 0.0%

14.8% 12.6% 0.0% 0.0% 25.6% 5.8% 2.1% 37.6% 17.5% 0.0% 11.4% 0.0%

15.3% 13.4% 0.0% 0.0% 27.4% 9.7% 0.0% 35.8% 19.5% 0.0% 7.7% 0.0%

15.8% 14.1% 0.0% 0.0% 28.3% 13.2% 0.0% 33.8% 21.8% 0.0% 2.9% 0.0%

16.3% 14.8% 0.0% 0.0% 29.7% 17.2% 0.0% 29.8% 23.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

17.0% 15.5% 0.0% 0.0% 30.7% 21.4% 0.0% 22.0% 25.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

17.7% 16.2% 0.0% 0.0% 31.9% 25.6% 0.0% 14.3% 28.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

18.5% 16.9% 0.0% 0.0% 33.1% 29.8% 0.0% 6.6% 30.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

19.3% 17.6% 0.0% 0.0% 33.4% 36.1% 0.0% 0.0% 30.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

20.9% 18.3% 0.0% 0.0% 28.3% 55.3% 0.0% 0.0% 16.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

23.5% 19.0% 0.0% 0.0% 23.2% 74.2% 0.0% 0.0% 2.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

27.4% 19.8% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 99.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% 40.0% 45.0% 50.0%

Ret

urn

Risk (Standard Deviation)

Efficient Frontier

ADM

AFL

CVS

Dis

Duke

J&J

Kroger

Microsoft

PG

Exxon

Page 17: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

Ex-Post Performance, 8/13/2012-8/12/13

Markowitz Portfolio (Blue Rock Equity) and S&P 500

17

Page 18: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

Bloomberg and Markowitz Excel Program Using Elton, Gruber, Padberg, and Manfred Technique for Determining Allocation

18

Rf 10 yr treasRm Index SPX

Start date 8/5/2006Ending date 8/8/2013Daily or weekly W

Beta Type raw betaRelativev Index SPXStart date 8/5/2006Ending date 8/8/2013Daily or weekly W

Import Data Type PortfolioID or Name u5945505-128

Name E(rj) βj V(εj) Rf V(RM) λβ Ci Wi

KROGER CO 15.77 0.56 8.70 2.58 2.84 23.73 2.1750 22.5%CVS CAREMARK CORP 16.91 0.61 8.71 2.58 2.84 23.44 4.2959 24.3%WALT DISNEY CO 19.78 1.08 5.08 2.58 2.84 15.99 8.3425 35.7%JOHNSON & JOHNSON 9.07 0.50 2.89 2.58 2.84 12.92 8.8792 16.6%DUKE ENERGY CORP 7.57 0.55 4.43 2.58 2.84 9.09 8.8967 0.5%PROCTER & GAMBLE CO 6.99 0.49 3.87 2.58 2.84 9.04 8.9068 0.4%AFLAC INC 13.61 1.51 17.61 2.58 2.84 7.33 8.7041 0.0%MICROSOFT CORP 7.01 0.80 8.98 2.58 2.84 5.56 8.4977 0.0%EXXON MOBIL CORP 5.15 0.78 4.45 2.58 2.84 3.30 7.9118 0.0%ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND CO 0.61- 0.88 13.88 2.58 2.84 3.62- 7.4022 0.0%

Page 19: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

Portfolio Insurance—OSA

The value of the XSIF portfolio on August 31, 2012 was $1,221,287

The S&P 500 closed at 1400, and December 1400 S&P 500 put option was trading at 59.70 ($100 multiplier) and December 1475 S&P 500 call was trading at 21.60.

Portfolio Insurance: np = $1,221,287/(1,400 x $100) = 8.72 Long Nine S&P 500 put contracts; Cost =

(9)(100)(59.70) = $53,730

19

Portfolio Insurance

Range Forward Position

Page 20: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

Market Timing

The value of the XSIF portfolio on August 31,

2012 was $1,221,287, the S&P 500 closed at 1,400, a December 1,400 S&P 500 put option was trading at 59.70 ($100 multiplier) and December 1,400 S&P 500 call was trading at 57.05.

Synthetic Long Position: Short: np = $1,221,287/(1,400 x $100) = 8.72 Long: nc = $1,221,287/(1,400 x $100) = 8.72 Cost = Cost = [(9)(100)(59.70)] − [(9)(100)(57.05)

= $34,290 = $2,385

For 20% plus and minus range in value, the portfolio’s profit and loss percentage ranges between −11.57% and +32.64%

For 20% plus and minus range in value, the option-enhanced portfolio’s profit and loss percentage ranges between −31.38% and +54.36%

20

Profit percentage graph without options

Profit percentage graph with options

Page 21: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

Efficient Markets : Style Portfolio

Stocks with the potential for consistent earnings and dividend growth without high volatility:

Market Cap.: Greater than or Equal to $2.0B

P/E (TTM Intraday): Less than or Equal to 20

Book Value Growth (5-Yr Avg.): Greater than or Equal to 5%

EPS Growth: 5-Yr Hist.: Greater than or Equal to 10%

Ret. on Equity (TTM): Greater than or Equal to 20%

Beta: Less than or Equal to 1.25 Divd. Growth Rate (5-Yr Avg.): Greater

than or Equal to 5%

21

Page 22: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

Efficient Markets

Style Portfolio

Stocks with the potential for consistent earnings and dividend growth without high volatility.

22

Page 23: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

Bond Evaluation

Total Returns Equilibrium Bond Prices

Level and Structure of Rates Yield Curve Analysis

Bond Risk and Spreads

Page 24: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

Total Return and Horizon Analysis—TRA

The TRA screen calculates total returns given different interest rate case.

The user can select different horizons, reinvestment rates (semiannual rate, S/A Reinv), and yield shifts (YLD SHFT).

The yield shifts are projected basis point shifts in the baseline yield curve (e.g. Treasury) between the settlement date and horizon date.

The screen shows the calculated price of the bond at the horizon at the yield reflecting the shift and the annualized total return based on the price, coupon, and interest on interest at the horizon and the current price.

24

Page 25: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

Yield Curves

The IYC9 screen shows the

total returns for different horizons and yield curve shift scenarios.

The top screen shows the total returns for each maturity from buying a Treasury and selling it one year later given no change in rates. As the total return graph shows, the largest returns occur from the intermediate-term and long-term maturities.

25

Page 26: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

Option Adjusted Spread Analysis—OAS1

Options adjusted spread (OAS) analysis is a method for value bonds with embedded options and estimating the additional spread required to compensate investors for the call risk they are assuming.

The OAS1 screen shows the calculated OAS and also the spread of the bond if there were no embedded options—the option-free spread. The spread due to embedded options can be estimated by subtracting the option-free spread from the total spread.

Using the Black-Derman-Toy model, the estimated an option-free spread for Ford on April 13, 2012 was 406.3 basis points. Given the total spread of 456.95 bp, the estimated spread due to Ford’s call option is 50.65 bp.

Note: Black-Derman Model has been

replaced in the updated OAS1 screen.

26

Page 27: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

27

AZS: Bloomberg Altman Z-Score

Screen

The Bloomberg screen shows the Altman Z-score model applied to Kraft and Ford on 4/15/2012.

As shown, Kraft has a score of 3.20, placing it in the unlikely default category, and a relatively stable Z-score history.

In contrast, Ford has a Z-score of 0.87, placing it in the increased risk of failure category.

However, it Z-score history in which its score has increased from a low of –0.0384 in 3/31/09 to 0.87 on 4/15/2012 indicates a significant improvement in credit quality.

Page 28: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

28

Constructing bond portfolios—PRTU

From the PMEN menu, some useful screens for analyzing fixed-income portfolios include: PORT: Portfolio & Risk Analytics; BSA: Scenario Analysis; PDSP: Portfolio Display; NPH: Portfolio News; CACT: Corporate Action Calendar; EVTS: Events Calendar; BSA: Scenario Analysis; PSH: Proposed Trade/Hedge Analysis; PCF: Expected Cash Flow; PREP; DRAM: Default Risk Monitor.

The PORT, BSA, EVTS, and DRAM screens that are shown in the following slides are for the Xavier Student Investment Fund (XSIF) bond portfolio as of September 29, 2012.

Bond Portfolios and Horizon Analysis PRTU and PMEN

Page 29: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

29

PORT: Characteristics

Page 30: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

30

BSA

Horizon Analysis

Page 31: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

31

DRAM

DRAM: Default Risk Monitor

Page 32: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

32

EVTS EVTS:

Events Calendar

Page 33: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

33

Portfolio Duration and Horizon Analysis

Total Returns for Portfolio with Duration of 5.5 and Horizon of 6

Page 34: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

34

Tab Screens: Details tab shows the detail of the

swap

Resets tab shows the reset rate at each effective date (forward LIBOR plus basis point you added to spread; one can change the rates from this tab).

Curves tab shows graphically the payments, receipts, and net payments. This tab screen can be adjusted to show each counterparty (pay fix or receive fix), cash flow, and market values.

Example: Fixed/Floating swap (Leg 1 is fixed-rate payer); NP = $5.75 million; fixed rate (coupon) = 1.5%; floating rate = 6-month LIBOR + 25 bp; frequency = semiannual; maturity = 5 years; forward curve = U.S. swaps (#23); discount curve = U.S. swaps (#23).

Bond Portfolios and Swaps SWPM

Page 35: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

35

MARS

Portfolio of five corporate bonds with market value of $5.75 million on 5/27/2012 and a generic five-year fixed payer swap with 1.5% fixed rate/LIBOR + 25 bp, NP = $5.75 million

Scenario: yield curve shifts: −100 bp to + 100 bp.

Market value evaluated currently and one year later

Analysis: Bond Portfolio only; Swap only; Combined portfolio and fixed payer swap

Page 36: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

Options OSA: Bloomberg’s Option Scenario Screen Example: IBM 1. Click OSA 2. On the OSA screen, click the red “Positions” tab and

then click “Add Listed Options” to bring up options listed on the security. This bring up a screen showing the listed options from which to select

3. After selecting the positions, type 1 <Enter> to load positions and bring up the OSA position screen

4. On the position screen, click the grey “Scenario Chart” tab at the top of the screen to bring up the profit graph. The profit graph shows profits for the strategy at expiration where the option price is trading at its intrinsic value and also at times periods prior to expiration where the option price is determined by an option pricing model. The profit graphs for different periods can be changed or deleted by using the select options at the top of the screen.

5. From the position screen (click Position tab), one can select different positions and then click “Scenario Chart” tab to view the profit graph.

6. The “Scenario” screen (click grey “Scenario” tab) shows the profit table

36

Page 37: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

Bloomberg Option Pricing Screen—OV or OVME

The Bloomberg OV screen calculates the price of an option using the Black-Scholes OPM or the Binomial (Trinomial).

The user can input the variability or use the historical volatility or the implied variance.

The OV or OVME screen can be used to value exiting options or an option created from an existing security.

Example: IBM Call and Put

37

Page 38: University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference...University of Delaware Finance Lab Conference R. Stafford Johnson Professor Department of Finance Xavier University Objectives In this

Screens and Searches

Economic Information

Industry—BI

Excel—Linking Bloomberg data to your own programs; Bloomberg Excel programs

Event Analysis

38

Back-Testing

Counties

Supply Chain and Input-Output

News and Law

Monitors

Launchpad

Facilitating Research—Some Thoughts