University Athletic Association Office of Student Lifefacilities.ufl.edu/prjdocs/00003488.pdf-...

73
FACILITIES PROGRAM University Athletic Association Office of Student Life (UAA-34) FACILITIES PROGRAM

Transcript of University Athletic Association Office of Student Lifefacilities.ufl.edu/prjdocs/00003488.pdf-...

FACILITIES PROGRAM

University Athletic Association Office of Student Life

(UAA-34)

FACILITIES PROGRAM

TITLE SHEET

University Athletic Association Office of Student Life

(UAA-34)

FACILITIES PROGRAM

FOR

UNIVERSITY ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION

UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA

MAIN CAMPUS UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA

MAY 5, 2014

UAA-34 I-1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUBJECT PAGE I. TITLE SHEET I

II. TABLE OF CONTENTS II III. SIGNATURE SHEET III IV. INTRODUCTION IV

A. Project Background & Justification B. General Project Description C. University Planning & Design Objectives D. Construction Delivery Method

V. ACADEMIC & STRATEGIC PLAN V A. The University of Florida Strategic Master Plan B. Academic Program Reviews C. Recommendations D. Justifications

VI. SPACE NEEDS ASSESSMENT VI A. Facilities Deficiencies B. Alternative Solutions C. Quantitative Analysis of Program Spaces D. Project and Survey Recommendations

VII. CONSISTENCY WITH ADOPTED CAMPUS MASTER PLAN VII A. The Adopted Campus Master Plan and Amendments B. Compliance With the Campus Master Plan

VIII. SITE ANALYSIS VIII A. Site Conditions B. Building Condition Survey C. Campus Map & Site Map D. Floor Plans

IX. PROGRAM AREA IX A. Program Area Table B. Summary by Space Category C. Space Description Forms

X. UTILITIES IMPACT ANALYSIS X A. Analysis of Impact on the Campus Utilities Infrastructure B. Utilities Infrastructure Cost Estimate C. Utilities Maps

XI. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND COMMUNICATION RESOURCES REQUIREMENTS XI A. University Information / Communication Standard B. University Information Resource Manager Certification C. General Information

XII. CODES AND STANDARDS XII XIII. PROJECT SCHEDULE XIII XIV. PROGRAM FUNDS XIV

A. Estimated Funding B. Estimated Budget

XV. PROJECT SPACE AND BUDGET SUMMARY XV XVI. EXHIBITS

A. University Committees Reviews XVI B.

XVII. OWNER’S PROJECT REQUIREMENTS (OPR) XVII

UAA-34 II-1

SIGNATURE SHEET

University Athletic Association Office of Student Life

FACILITIES PROGRAM FOR

UNIVERSITY ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION

UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA

MAIN CAMPUS UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA

PREPARED BY: Planning, Design & Construction Division

University Athletic Association

REVIEWED AND APPROVED: UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF BUSINESS AFFAIRS

Curtis Reynolds, Vice-President FACILITIES PLANNING & CONSTRUCTION DIVISION

Carol J. Walker, Assistant Vice-President UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE VICE-PRESIDENT AND CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER

Elias G. Eldayrie, Chief Information Officer PHYSICAL PLANT DIVISION

Jeff Chorlog, Assistant Vice-President OFFICE OF ACADEMIC TECHNOLOGY

Dr. Fedro Zazueta, Director UNIVERSITY ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION

Chip Howard, Senior Associate Athletic Director

UAA-34 III-1

PROJECT DIRECTORY: UNIVERSITY PROJECT MANAGER: Bahar Armaghani

University Project Manager

Planning, Design & Construction Division Ben Hill Griffin Stadium 245 Gale Lemerand Drive P.O. Box 115050 Gainesville, FL 32611-5050 www.facilities.ufl.edu

Phone: 352-273-4025 FAX: 352-392-6378 E-Mail: [email protected]

OWNER: The University of Florida Board of Trustees & University Athletic

Association Ben Hill Griffin Stadium 245 Gale Lemerand Drive P.O. Box 115050 Gainesville, FL 32611-5050 www.facilities.ufl.edu

USER GROUP REPRESENTATIVE:

Chip Howard Senior Associate Athletic Director, Athletic Association University of Florida

Phone: 352-375-6483 FAX: 352-284-2725 E-Mail: [email protected]

UAA-34 III-2

INTRODUCTION

A. PROJECT BACKGROUND and JUSTIFICATION The current facility was completed in 1995 and includes approximately 35,000 square feet of space. Office of Student Life (OSL) currently occupies all of third floor, the southwest portion of first floor, and shares the rest of first floor and second floor with the University Academic Advisement Center. A review of the existing building indicated the following strengths and weaknesses: • Strengths - Office sizes appear to be adequate. - Central campus location is convenient for most students. - The programs and activities which occur within the facility are extremely successful. • Weaknesses - There is not adequate space to meet the needs of OSL. Specifically, more tutoring rooms, study areas,

and resource areas are needed. - The interior finishes and furniture are very dated. - The types of interior spaces are not what today’s student looks for when seeking a location for study. - The existing auditorium is undersized and not designed to accommodate the athletes who use it. - The first impression is not positive because of the crowded conditions in the waiting area. - The OSL areas are not adequately branded to celebrate Gator Athletics. - The facility image is not an asset to the recruiting process. - There is not adequate casual/informal study space for student athletes.

B. GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION

OSL currently uses space in Farrior Hall and in several other buildings on campus. To improve efficiency and student-athlete convenience, it is desired that all OSL needs be accommodated at one location with the remodeling and expansion of the existing building. Objectives and expected Outcomes of the Project - Create a facility that helps retention of coaches and student athletes. Great facilities are a part of the total package that coaches and student athletes consider when asked to make a commitment to an institution. - Create a facility that expands and enhances the academic opportunities for all UF students. - Create a facility that offers a powerful first impression to recruits and parents. - Optimize efficiency by continuing to share space between OSL and AAC. - Celebrate the academic success of UF student athletes. - Offer enough space so all who seek out these services have spaces they can use to improve their academic success. - Create various types of spaces for study. Include formal large groups, small groups, individual spaces at study tables, and more casual areas. Some spaces could even allow food and beverages.

C. UNIVERSITY PLANNING and DESIGN OBJECTIVES

The following general goals and objectives shall be considered and addressed throughout design, construction, and commissioning. Consult the UF Design Services Guide for amplifying information.

Project-specific design goals are outlined in the Owner’s Project Requirements (OPR) document in section XVII of this Facilities Program.

UAA-34 IV-1

1. TREE PRESERVATION Since tree preservation and protection is a high priority at the University of Florida, existing trees should be saved and incorporated into the design whenever possible. Planning, design, and construction of this building must strictly comply with the current University Tree Protection Policy and be reviewed by the UF Lakes, Vegetation and Landscaping Committee. The need to remove or relocate any trees other than those recommended by this Committee during programming must be justified and presented to the Committee during schematic design for approval. Tree protection measures shall be incorporated as outlined in the UF Design & Construction Standards and reviewed / approved by Physical Plant Division (PPD) Grounds. See Sections VIII and XVI of this program for additional information on tree preservation.

2. LANDSCAPING, STORMWATER, AND EXTERIOR LIGHTING The design and construction documents shall include fully detailed landscaping, landscape irrigation, hardscape, exterior lighting, stormwater management, erosion control measures, and other site features and components such as benches and seat walls. Such design shall account not only for functionality and aesthetics, but also for security, safety, accessibility, and sustainability.

Site/landscape plans, designs, and specifications shall be developed jointly with UF Physical Plant Division Grounds and in accordance with both the UF Design & Construction Standards and program review comments by the UF Lakes, Vegetation and Landscaping Committee (see Section XVI). The landscape plan will be subject to review by the same during the Schematic Design and Design Development phases.

Low-impact design for stormwater management shall be considered and incorporated into the design, as applicable and where possible, even if an on-site stormwater treatment facility is not required for permitting.

3. BICYCLES, TRANSIT, WALKWAYS AND MOTOR VEHICLE CIRCULATION Bicycles, transit, and walkways are the primary modes of transportation to, on, and around campus. Site design for this project must include adequate walkways that are fully integrated with the existing pedestrian circulation network, as well as safe and convenient bicycle parking facilities and access to bus stops with appropriate amenities. Bicycle lanes, paths, and storage shall be designed in accordance with the latest edition of the UF Design & Construction Standards. Appropriate access shall also be provided for service and delivery vehicles in screened service areas.

Unimpaired access for emergency vehicles and full compliance with ADA requirements is mandatory for all site development plans and throughout construction. Throughout construction, at least one lane of all streets must be kept open and all sidewalks and designated bicycle lanes or paths shall be kept open or appropriately rerouted / redirected.

4. DESIGN FOR FUTURE EXPANSION AND RENOVATION Within program and budget constraints, the site and building will be designed to allow flexibility and change. The usable life and sustainability of the facility shall be enhanced by incorporating features for remodeling and expansion designed to reduce future renovation costs. The Campus Master Plan shall be consulted for guidance on future building locations that should not be impeded by new utilities or other infrastructure associated with the project. See the OPR document in section XVII of this Facilities Program for detailed, project-specific goals related to flexibility.

5. CONTEXTUAL SITE AND BUILDING DESIGN Site and building shall emphasize the design of the total campus entity rather than the individual buildings. While each building is required to be designed as an appropriate response to its particular program, budget, and site requirements, it must also be compatible with the existing fabric of the campus. The design of the building must enrich the campus both functionally and aesthetically relating to adjoining buildings, not competing with them.

The building site and context shall also integrate with any existing topographic or natural features. The project should seek to create functional open space in the form of building entries, courtyards, plazas or lawns within the building’s exterior space or between the project and existing adjacent buildings. Building height, orientation and set-backs shall be consistent with policies of the Campus Master Plan, as applicable. It is expected that two or more options will be presented to the Owner during the schematic design phase.

UAA-34 IV-2

6. HISTORICAL RESOURCES The University of Florida campus contains numerous significant historical properties and sites which are listed on or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. The campus includes a registered Historic District and a larger historic impact area as identified in the Campus Master Plan. The University strongly supports maintenance and restoration of historical buildings. All capital improvement projects must comply with the Programmatic Memorandum of Agreement between the University of Florida and the Division of Historical Resources dated October 27, 1989, and be reviewed by the UF Preservation of Historic Buildings and Sites Committee.

7. UNIFYING EXTERIOR TREATMENT THROUGH USE OF BRICK The use of “Gainesville Range” red brick for the major portion of the exterior finish is required in order to serve as the primary visual element consistently used in unifying all campus facilities. The use of “accent” brick is discouraged. Other unifying architectural treatments should be considered that reflect modern interpretations of the collegiate gothic style as expressed in the character-defining features of existing campus buildings, particularly those buildings within the vicinity of the project.

8. SUSTAINABLE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION The University of Florida builds its buildings to last and promotes environmental quality and resource conservation through sustainable design, “green” architecture, and recycling in its physical planning and development. See the OPR document in section XVII of this Facilities Program for detailed, project-specific sustainability goals.

9. UNIVERSITY COMMITTEES REVIEWS New construction projects located on the main campus of the University of Florida – and certain renovation projects –must be presented to the following (4) faculty-based Committees for approval of the site plan and building exterior design at the Schematic and Design Development phases: • Transportation and Parking Advisory Committee (TPAC) • Preservation of Historic Buildings & Sites Committee (PHBSC) • Lakes, Vegetation and Landscape Committee (LVLC) • University Land Use and Facilities Planning Committee (ULUFPC)

The Architect is expected to address all review comments provided by the Committees, including the program development phase review comments included in the Section XVI of this facilities program.

10. University Preliminary Study for this Project

University Athletic Association conducted a feasibility study on November 2012 for this project, the design team must review the study before design begins.

11 QUALITY The University expects the facility to convey an impressive, state-of-the-art, and first-class image to current and prospective faculty, staff, and students, as well as visiting faculty, alumni, and private industry. At the same time, cost control, adherence to codes and standards, sustainability, and the durability and ease of maintenance are also primary considerations. Spaces must be technologically equipped, acoustically reliable, well lit, properly conditioned, and arranged thoughtfully in a floor plan that takes advantage of shared-use spaces while accounting for the differences between public and non-public spaces. Premium finishes shall be used in highly visible, public areas, while more standard materials shall be incorporated into less public, staff-oriented work spaces. The designers’ experience with similar facilities should allow it to confirm that the facility is constructed in accordance with the Basis of Design, the construction documents, applicable codes, and the UF Design & Construction Standards as part of Basic (Construction Administration) Services. Major building systems, including mechanical components and the building envelope, will be commissioned by an independent consultant, with whom the design team shall plan and coordinate its efforts.

UAA-34 IV-3

D. CONSTRUCTION DELIVERY METHOD

Using F.A.C. 6C-14.0055(2) as a reference guideline, the following responses are presented for justification of Construction Management as the method of project delivery:

The F.A.C. 6C-14.0055.(2) is used as reference guideline and the following responses are presented for University approval for the selection of Construction Management as the project delivery method:

(2).(a): Size of the project is sufficiently large and/or complex to require major emphasis on the qualification of the contractor to provide specific expertise in highly specialized cost estimating, value engineering, and scheduling during the design process with continuity of construction management through both design and construction phases.

(2).(b): The initial construction funding is appropriated and construction is begun with the expectation of substantial appropriation in subsequent years, thereby making it advantageous to retain a single contractor for the duration of the project.

(2).(c): The project is an alteration of an occupied facility which requires working around or relocating occupants while keeping the facility fully operational.

Building the new addition, then renovating and renovating the existing facility

(2).(d): The project is a repair or renovation where the conditions requiring correction can not be determined and specified without extensive contractor involvement in the removal and examination process during the design phase.

(2).(e): The timely completion of the project is critical to the University’s ability to repay debt services or to meet grant obligations.

UAA-34 IV-4

ACADEMIC & STRATEGIC PLAN

A. The UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA STRATEGIC MASTER PLAN The project is consistent with UF Master Plan.

B. ACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEWS The existing facility has deficiency in space to provide complete advisement to student athletes. The mission of the Office of Student Life (OSL) is to prepare University of Florida student-athletes for life after college. In order to accomplish this mission, the OSL provides and supports quality programs and services that facilitate graduation and promote the overall development of student-athletes. The focus of these programs is to promote the personal, educational, and career development of student athletes. The OSL staff is committed to empowering student-athletes to develop independence, self-reliance, personal values, leadership skills, interdependence and responsibility for their own lives. See assessment study conducted on November 2012.

C. RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE REVIEW CONSULTANTS • Strengths - Office sizes appear to be adequate. - Central campus location is convenient for most students. - The programs and activities which occur within the facility are extremely successful. • Weaknesses - There is not adequate space to meet the needs of OSL. Specifically, more tutoring rooms, study areas,

and resource areas are needed. - The interior finishes and furniture are very dated. - The types of interior spaces are not what today’s student looks for when seeking a location for study. - The existing auditorium is undersized and not designed to accommodate the athletes who use it. - The first impression is not positive because of the crowded conditions in the waiting area. - The OSL areas are not adequately branded to celebrate Gator Athletics. - The facility image is not an asset to the recruiting process. - There is not adequate casual/informal study space for student athletes.

D. JUSTIFICATIONS OSL currently uses space in Farrior Hall and in several other buildings on campus. To improve efficiency and student-athlete convenience, it is desired that all OSL needs be accommodated at one location with the remodeling and expansion of the existing building. Overall, the user group expressed a desire for more separation between AAC and OSL student spaces. However, the “back of house” areas for each group, including offices, should remain close to one another to optimize daily communication.

UAA-34 V-1

SPACE NEEDS ASSESSMENT

A. FACILITIES DEFICIENCIES OSL currently uses space in Farrior Hall and in several other buildings on campus. To improve efficiency and student-athlete convenience, it is desired that all OSL needs be accommodated at one location with the remodeling and expansion of the existing building. Objectives and expected Outcomes of the Project - Create a facility that helps retention of coaches and student athletes. Great facilities are a part of the total package that coaches and student athletes consider when asked to make a commitment to an institution. - Create a facility that expands and enhances the academic opportunities for all UF students. - Create a facility that offers a powerful first impression to recruits and parents. - Optimize efficiency by continuing to share space between OSL and AAC. - Celebrate the academic success of UF student athletes. - Offer enough space so all who seek out these services have spaces they can use to improve their academic success. - Create various types of spaces for study. Include formal large groups, small groups, individual spaces at study tables, and more casual areas. Some spaces could even allow food and beverages. Providing additional spaces deemed necessary to provide top service to student athletes.

B. ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS There is no alternative solution.

C. QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF PROGRAM SPACES A feasibility study was conducted by University Athletic Association on November 2012, where list of spaces and services studied and proposed spaces listed to meet the student advisement needs. See attached study. The Size of Spaces and Occupant Criteria Table contained in the State Requirements for Educational Facilities Chapter 6, Section 6.1, Size of Spaces and Occupant Criteria Table was utilized as a guide in the development of the program.

D. PROJECT AND SURVEY RECOMMENDATIONS Due to the deficiency in the advisement space, the service must be continues and the new building will be constructed and the advisement center staff and services will be moved to the new building. Then the existing building will be renovated and staff and services for OSL and AAC will be located to their permanent spaces.

UAA-34 VI-1

CONSISTENCY WITH THE ADOPTED CAMPUS MASTER PLAN

A. THE ADOPTED CAMPUS MASTER PLAN (CMP) AND AMENDMENTS

The project is consistent with the terms of the associated campus development agreement, which was prepared and adopted pursuant to FAC 6C-21.213 and 1013.30 F. S. An amendment to the Capital Improvement Element of the CMP will be required to program the scope and siting of the project. Although the Capital Improvement Element of the CMP does not identify the project as currently described, this element of the CMP is updated annually and the project will be added during the next 2014 amendment cycle. The project is consistent with the CMP policies in all other respects as described herein, and is within the minor amendment criteria as established in UF Operating Memorandum consistent with 1013.30 F.S. In anticipation of the scheduled submittal of the required amendment, and a finding of consistency with the adopted CMP, it is the University’s desire that the project (as described in this facilities program) be approved as submitted. An amendment to the CMP Future Land Use map and/or other policies will be required to identify the scope and siting of the project. The project is consistent with the CMP policies in all other respects as described herein, and is within the minor amendment criteria as established in UF Operating Memorandum consistent with 1013.30 F.S. In anticipation of the scheduled submittal of the required amendment, and a finding of consistency with the adopted CMP, it is the University’s desire that the project (as described in this facilities program) be approved as submitted.

B. COMPLIANCE WITH THE CAMPUS MASTER PLAN, 2005-2015

1. URBAN DESIGN ELEMENT The project does not impact open space connections identified on Figure 1-4 of the Urban Design Element.

The project is located within the Historic District or Historic Impact Area depicted on Figure 1-2 of the Urban Design Element. The project within the Historic District will meet the requirements of the University’s Memorandum of Understanding with the State Division of Historic Resources per Policy 1.7.1 of the Urban Design Element.

The project is not located within an Archaeological Site or Sensitivity Zone as identified in the University’s Memorandum of Understanding with the State Division of Historic Resources and referenced in Policy 1.7.1 of the Urban Design Element.

The project is not located within or adjacent to an Open Space Enhancement Priority area as identified in Figure 1-5 of the Urban Design Element.

Per Policy 1.3.9 of the Urban Design Element, the (building / addition) shall be a minimum of three stories, unless programmatic, functional, or code requirements dictate a height of less than 3 stories, or alternate building height policies apply. Building height and orientation shall be consistent with policies 1.3.4, 1.3.5, 1.3.6, 1.3.7, 1.3.8 1.3.9 and 1.3.10 as applicable for buildings located near the Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Institute, Genetics and Cancer Research Center, Fifield Hall, Cultural Plaza, Radio Road Commuter Lot, Archer Road Corridor/Planning Sector “G”, Historic Impact Area depicted on Figure 1-2, P.K. Yonge Laboratory School/Planning Sector “H” or Eastside Campus.

2. FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT The Future Land Use Element of the CMP identifies the project site within the Parking :and Use Classification area in the Future Land Use Map. The project is not consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the CMP. The project requires that the site be identified as Support in the Future Land Use Map. The Future Land Use Map will be amended to reflect the rearrangement of land use.

UAA-34 VII-1

3. SUPPORT / CLINICAL FACILITIES ELEMENT

Goal 1: To Provide Sufficient Facilities for Student Services, Administrative, Physical Plant, Clinical, Auxiliary and Other Non-Instructional Functions that Support the University’s Teaching, Research and Extension Mission. Objective 1.0: Provide support facilities consistent with the academic support needs of the University and in accordance with applicable space standards and customer expectations. Policy 1.1.3: Support facilities that serve primarily students shall be conveniently located in proximity to academic areas, student housing and transit facilities to maximize accessibility.

4. CONSERVATION ELEMENT The project does not reduce the size of an area in the Conservation Future Land Use.

The project (including any associated utilities or infrastructure) is not adjacent to or within an area in the Conservation Future Land Use.

The project is not within 50 feet of a wetland.

The project is not within the 100-year floodplain.

The project does not disturb any plants or animals identified as threatened and endangered species or species of special concern by Federal and State agencies.

5. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT The project does not include a parking structure or surface with at least 300 parking spaces located in Alachua County.

Per Policy 2.6.5 of the Transportation Element the Project wil do the following: a) Accommodate adequate parking for special needs of disabled persons, service and delivery vehicles; and b) Mitigate the loss of existing parking.

6. GENERAL INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT The project is not within the Hogtown Creek drainage basin.

7. UTILITIES ELEMENT The project will coordinate with the Physical Plant Division and the Office of Information Technology for utility and telecommunications infrastructure provisions.

8. PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT The project will coordinate with the University Police Department for security systems, lighting and Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design provisions.

9. FACILITIES MAINTENANCE ELEMENT The project does not include renovation, rehabilitation or restoration of an existing structure that meets the definition of an “historic property” as described in Policy 1.5.4 of the Facilities Maintenance Element.

10. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT The project will be added to the Ten-Year Capital Projects List.

Presently, the site is not identified as a recommended future building site. The Future Building Sites Map will be amended to add this building site.

11. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT Project notification will be provided to the City of Gainesville and Alachua County through the University Land Use and Facilities Planning Committee per Policy 1.1.1 of the Intergovernmental Coordination Element.

The net new gross square feet of building space to be constructed by this project is consistent with the campus development agreement.

12. IMPLEMENTATION ELEMENT The project will be implemented consistent with the CMP policies related to committee review procedures and CMP amendments as applicable.

UAA-34 VII-2

SITE ANALYSIS

A. SITE CONDITIONS

1 . SITE TOPOGRAPHY Refer to Section X, Utilities Impact Analysis for site maps.

2 . STORM DRAINAGE Refer to Section X, Utilities Impact Analysis for site maps and description of the site storm water system.

3 . VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION Analyze the pedestrian circulation from the O’Dome parking lot and parking garage through the project and Stadium Drive.

4 . SITE VEGETATION Integrate green and shading into the plaza.

5 . ARCHAEOLOGICAL HISTORY The Archeological Zones of Sensitivity Map (developed in accordance with Section 267.061(2), F.S.) indicates the project site is a designated archeological site or is partially/fully inside the archeological sensitivity zone. The project site will be surveyed in accordance with Section 267, F.S., by a certified archeologist and remediation provided for prior to construction start.

6 . EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS Refer to Section X, Utility Impact Analysis for campus utility infrastructure maps and description of site utilities.

7 . ARCHITECTURAL SIGNIFICANCE OF ADJACENT STRUCTURES Design the addition and the main entrance to fit the context of the surrounding buildings.

8 . UNUSUAL SITE CONDITIONS Utility reroute and parking relocation.

9 . DIRECTION OF PREVAILING WINDS There is no University wide study of the prevailing wind patterns. Generally the wind patterns vary seasonally reflecting the global patterns: the Gulf Stream which brings warm, moisture laden tropic air from the southeast; and the arctic winds from northwest buffet the region in the winter. More importantly, the Architect must study the effect of microclimate created by existing tree canopy and site conditions (in addition to the relationship to adjacent building exhaust, fresh air intake and vehicular traffic patterns) in siting the building and in designing for views and HAVC/MEP systems.

10 . ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS, IF DESIRED. See building study that was conducted in 2012.

B. BUILDING CONDITION SURVEY

PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION

1 . OSL currently uses space in Farrior Hall and in several other buildings on campus. To improve efficiency and student-athlete convenience, it is desired that all OSL needs be accommodated at one location with the remodeling and expansion of the existing

2 . Out dated equipment and finishes also, limited space for AAC and OSL in the current building.

C. CAMPUS MAP & SITE MAP Refer to Section X, Utilities Impact Analysis for site maps. DESCRIPTION (Maps follow end of this SITE ANALYSIS Section)

1 . Campus and Facilities Location Map

2 . Site and Topographical Map

UAA-34 VIII-1

D. FLOOR PLANS

FLOOR PLANS (Floor Plans follow end of this SITE ANALYSIS Section)

1 . Ground Floor Plan

2 . Second Floor Plan

3 . Third and fourth

UAA-34 VIII-2

UAA-34 VIII-3

UAA-34 VIII-4

UAA-34 VIII-5

PROGRAM AREA

UAA-34 IX-1

UAA-34 IX-2

UAA-34 IX-3

C. SPACE DESCRIPTION FORM, See above

SPACE NUMBER C. DEPARTMENT: AREA: SPACE NAME: DESCRIPTION / USE: SPACE CATEGORY: ROOM USE CODE: PERSONNEL ASSIGNED / MAX.: DIMENSION / AREA: NASF NUMBER REQUIRED: RELATIONSHIPS PRIMARY: SECONDARY: ARCHITECTURAL CRITERIA FLOORS: Mildew resistant carpet w/ vinyl base. Vinyl cementitious tile w/ vinyl base. Non-

slip ceramic tile w/ tile base. Terrazzo w/ matching base. Sealed concrete w/ vinyl base. Rubber floor w/ matching base.

WALLS: Paint over veneer plaster. Epoxy/high gloss paint over CMU/concrete. Hardwood paneling w/ matching trim.

CEILINGS: Suspended acoustic tile. Paint over veneer plaster. DOORS: Solid core wood w/ HM frame. Aluminum & glass storefront system. WINDOWS: Desired but not required. Desired for daylighting & view. Desired for ventilation.

Aluminum & glass storefront system. Automatic vertical blinds. LIGHTING: Recessed fluorescent w/ parabolic reflector. Accent lighting. Task lighting as

required. High efficiency pendant lighting. Track lighting. Indirect lighting. Low voltage electronic lighting dimmer & control system.

ACOUSTICAL: Full acoustical treatment of walls & ceilings, extend partitions to the deck above w/ sound attenuating blanket. Maintain ambient noise level at NC 30 or less.

MECHANICAL CRITERIA HVAC: PLUMBING: COMMUNICATIONS: ELECTRICAL: FURNITURE/EQUIPMENT FURNITURE (OWNER): EQUIPMENT (OWNER): FURNITURE (CONTRACTOR): EQUIPMENT (CONTRACTOR): SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION/REQUIREMENTS 1. Add as required.

Add these Space Description Forms as needed. Provide one Space Description Form for each different space type. Consolidate as much as possible. Floor Plan Drawings of proposed room layout can be included.

UAA-34 IX-4

foYTISREVINU

foYTISREVINU

foYTISREVINU

foYTISREVINU

foYTISREVINU

28

TO MH-27

28A

S

G1

7

23

27A

foYTISREVINU

foYTISREVINU

foYTISREVINU

foYTISREVINU

foYTISREVINU

foYTISREVINU

R

R

F

F

ROOM 113

TIME CLOCK

ROOM 101

F

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

DD

D

D

D

D

DD

D

D

D

JB

D

D

D

D

D

DD

D

D

ROOM 113B D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

R

R

R

RD

D

D

D

DD

D D D

D

D

D

DD

D

DD

D D

D

DD

D

D

D

D

D

S03-8

S03-7

S03-6

S03-5

19-1

111-1

111-2

111-3

111-4

111-5

16-2

16-3

16-4

16-516-6

16-7

16-8

16-9

16-10

134-1

9-1 9-2

28-8

15-1

15-2

15-3

15-4

15-5

15-6

16-11

16-12

D

28-8A

R

R

F

D

D

F

JB

JB

RR

RR

D

D

D D

D

D

DD

D

DD D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

DD

D

D D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

JB

JB

S18-32

S18-31

S18-29

S18-27

S18-26

S18-33

S25-1

S25-2

S25-3

S25-8

S25-5

S25-6

S25-11

72-21

S25-7

S25-10

S25-12

S25-13

18-1

18-2

18-3

18-4

18-9A

18-8

18-9

18-10

18-11

18-12

18-13

18-14

18-15

18-16

18-6

18-7

18-17

18-18

18-19

21-11

21-12

38-1

38-2

S21-2

581267

581269

581269

D

D

D

D D

D

D D D

72-18

72-19

72-17

72-16

72-15

72-14

72-20

72-22

72-23

F

JB

R

D

D

D

D

D

D

447-2

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

DD

D

JB

S18-24

S18-21

S03-10

S03-9

S03-11

S03-12

S03-13

S03-14

S03-16

S03-17

S03-17

S03-18

42-4

581267

D

D

JB

D

D

D

267-19

447-1

267-21

DDD

D D D

D

D

D

D

D D DDDD

D

D

72-13

72-12

72-11 72-10

72-9 72-8

72-7

72-6

72-5

72-4

72-2

72-1

72-3

R

DS03-18

foYTISREVINU

foYTISREVINU

foYTISREVINU

foYTISREVINU

UTILITIES IMPACT ANALYSIS

A. UTILITIES IMPACT ANALYSIS This preliminary Utilities Impact Analysis has been performed in accordance with this program - UAA-34 Office of Student Life. Any questions regarding this document should be referred to Bill Weltner, Utility Planner, PPD. Project consists of 45,000 gsf of new study, offices, auditorium, and support areas. All utility system expansions/modifications shall be in accordance with The University of Florida DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. Special attention shall be paid to The University of Florida UTILITIES POLICY published by the Physical Plant Division. If the existing utility services are insufficient to meet a project's requirements, it is incumbent upon the project to perform the utility upgrades necessary make those services adequate.

1. CHILLED WATER: Total estimated peak demand for the new facility is around 166 tons with a peak flow of 284 gpm assuming a 14°∆T (temperature difference between supply and return). This area of campus is served by the Weil Chiller Plant #1 located southwest of the site. The Weil Plant has a current capacity of around 6625 tons (nameplate) which will increase to 6800 tons this fall with the replacement of Chiller #4. The plant has a peak demand of around tons. The distribution piping adjacent to the site on the west side of Fletcher Drive is 14” and can accommodate the additional flow of the new facility. It is anticipated that a new manhole will be constructed around the 14’ piping and include new isolation valves and distribution piping extended to the new building.

2. STEAM & CONDENSATE: Estimated peak steam demand is around 1,200 lbs/hr. A steam distribution system served by the Progress Energy 47 megawatt cogeneration plant serves UF with 70 psi steam. The area south of the site for the new facility is supplied by 2 - 8” steam supply and 1-6” condensate return mains which in turn serve manhole MH-3D4-48 where the system tees to a set of capped 4” supply and 2” condensate pipes facing into the site. Steam capacity from the Cogeneration facility is adequate for this new facility demand as well as the piping distribution system. It is recommended that the new piping system extend from the capped 4”/2” system at manhole MH-3D4-48 to the new facility.

3. ELECTRICAL: The estimated peak demand for the new facility is 170 kW (around 24amps at 4160V). The electrical service supplying this area of campus is the 4160V primary service distribution which is supplied power by Substation #1 or #3 depending on switch positions. Potential feeders available for connection would be Substation #1, feeder #2 (#1-2) and feeder #3-2 located in manhole #28A, or feeders #1-1 and #1-2 in manhole #27. Recorded peak demands at the substation breakers are as follows: circuit 1-2 appx 70amps, circuit 1-1 appx 60 amps, circuit 3-2 appx 35amps. Substation breaker setting for all 3 circuits is 240 amps; feeders are 4/0 with a capacity of around 240 amps. With the addition of 24 amps from the new facility both the substation and distribution system are adequate for this new demand. To construct electrical service to the new facility feeder 1-2 and 3-2 could be intercepted in manhole 28A and new feeders installed in 3w6” ductbank and terminated at a new 3 way SF6 gas switch. Two of the switch ways would be for the feeder, the other would be a VFI for the new demand; a new feeder could be constructed from it to the new building transformer (probably 250kVA). The other option would be to connect to feeders 1-2 and 1-1 in manhole 27 and extend to the site in similar fashion. The electrical design engineer should work closely with PPD to determine the best options for the campus system and reliability for the new facility.

4. POTABLE WATER: Projected peak domestic water flow for the new facility is approximately 34 gpm. Existing 6” and 8” mains transverse the site east and west on the south side of the site and can be intersected for domestic and fire suppression needs. The domestic water line for the facility shall have dual reduced pressure backflow prevention, domestic water booster pumps, and shall be metered in accordance with UF standards. Site fire protection required by the Hunter/RSH October 1989 Water Systems Evaluation for this area of campus is 3500gpm @ 20psi. The Consultant will be required to analyze project demand for fire flow and domestic requirements and make design recommendations.

5. SANITARY SEWER: The estimated average daily flow for the proposed facility is approximately 9,700 gpd and will be served by the UF 3 MGD capacity Water Reclamation Plant located in the south part of campus. There is a 6” to 8” gravity piping system located at the south side of the site that can be intersected at manhole MH-3D4-75. The designer shall be responsible for design of all sanitary piping according to UF standards.

UAA-34 X-1

6. IRRIGATION/RECLAIMED WATER: The facility site has an existing network of irrigation lines supplied by the campus reclaimed water system. Existing sprinkler lines are located beneath the new addition facility footprint and will need to be abandoned and capped and a new system installed. The new irrigation system must be designed according to Reclaimed Water standards.

7. STORM WATER MANAGEMENT: The new facility will be located in Lake Alice basin area designated LA-14 according to Causseaux and Ellington’s 2000 Storm Water Management Master Plan. No additional permitting is expected to be required; however, verification should be made by the Architect/Engineer with the UF Physical Plant Division. Impervious area calculations should be sent to PPD Architecture/Engineering Dept. (Chuck Hogan) for inclusion in the annual submittal to the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD). A 15” system is located beneath the expected footprint and will have to be relocated. Design measures should be taken to employ the latest storm water management techniques.

8. NATURAL GAS AND FUEL SYSTEMS: Natural gas most likely will not be required for this facility but if required, the closest gas main is a distribution main that transverses the project site east/west and is located south of the existing parking lot and served by GRU.

9. TELECOMMUNICATIONS: See UF telecommunication standards.

10. FIRE ALARM SYSTEM: The fire alarm system shall comply with UF Construction Standards and will report via analog phone line to the campus centrally monitored system.

11. ENERGY MANAGEMENT CONTROL SYSTEM: The EMCS network should be expanded to receive the new facility and the project should employ the latest in BAS technology. The designer should consult with UAA to determine needs and vendor selection.

12. SITE LIGHTING: Any existing site lighting located in the site area will require relocation. The design consultant will be required to establish lighting levels in the project vicinity that are in compliance with UF standards.

13. WASTE MANAGEMENT/SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS: Site improvements will be required according to existing and proposed conditions related to paving, walks, hardscapes and landscapes. There is an existing 6 cy waste dumpster as well as a paper dumpster located at the northeast corner of the project site in the parking lot. Depending on final building use (whether there is dining) the dumpster requirements could increase to 2 waste dumpsters and a paper dumpster or possibly a vertical compactor. Please consult with Dale Morris at PPD for requirements

UAA-34 X-2

B: UTILITIES INFRASTRUCTURE COST ESTIMATES

CHILLED WATER Impact Fee $465,000 System Work $220,000 Sub Total $685,000 STEAM & CONDENSATE Sub Total $95,000 ELECTRICAL Sub Total $190,000 POTABLE WATER Sub Total $49,000 SANITARY Sub Total $72,500 IRRIGATION Sub Total $4,000 STORM WATER Sub Total $90,500 TELECOMMUNICATIONS Sub Total WASTE MANAGEMENT Sub Total $3,600

TOTAL $1,189,600

C. UTILITIES MAPS

DESCRIPTION

1. Facilities Location Base Map 2. Chilled Water System 3. Steam System 4. Electrical System 5. Potable Water System 6. Sanitary Sewer System 7. Irrigation 8. Storm Drainage System 9. Fuel Oil and Gas System 10. Telecommunications 11. Television 12. Energy Management System 13. Street and Area Lighting System 14. Topographical Map 15. Reclaimed Water 16. Archeological Location Map

UAA-34 X-3

INFORMATION / COMMUNICATIONS RESOURCES REQUIREMENTS

A. UNIVERSITY INFORMATION / COMMUNICATION STANDARD The following University of Florida standards govern the information / communications resources requirements for the design of new facilities and renovation of existing facilities at the University of Florida: • Telecommunications and Computer Networking Support Structures • Intra-Building Wiring Standards and Preferred Practices • Inter-Building Communications Infrastructure Standards • Inter-Building Cabling Standards and Guidelines • Academic Technologies Office - Classroom Standards (when classrooms are present) These standards may be viewed on the Office of Information Technology (OIT) website (http://net-services.ufl.edu/infrastructure/) or Facilities Planning and Construction website (www.facilities.ufl.edu).

B. UNIVERSITY INFORMATION RESOURCE MANAGER CERTIFICATION By signature (on the signature page of this facilities program) the University Information Resource Manager certifies that a review of the University information/communication standards has been completed; and that the facilities program was developed in conformance with the University of Florida Information / Communication Standards in accordance with the Section 282, F.S.

C. GENERAL INFORMATION The design team shall include the resources needed to fully develop a complete scope of work for all telecommunications, I/T, and audio/visual systems and components (including BICSI or RCDD qualified staff). The Owner may elect to accomplish portions of this work outside of the construction contract, but the construction documents must still account for all work (i.e., with notes for work “by others”). • (BICSI): Building Industry Consulting Service International, Inc. • (RCDD): Registered Communications Distribution Designer Telecommunications plant work (exterior of facility) is typically purchased by the project through OIT. The architect/engineer shall coordinate with OIT to eliminate conflicts with other utilities, landscaping, etc., shall include all such work "by others" in the construction documents, and shall ensure that no gaps exist between the contractors’ scope of work and the scope(s) of work “by others.” Building interior telecommunication installation must be performed by a contactor who is qualified by OIT. OIT maintains a list of pre-qualified Low-Voltage Contractors, this list can be found at http://net-services.ufl.edu/infrastructure/.

Interior voice & data work shall be designed, specified, packaged, and competitively procured as are other trades. OIT shall, however, participate and have approval authority in the bidder pre-qualification process. All such work shall be included in the construction documents and coordinated by the architect/engineer. For UF Health Science Center projects, the interior voice & data work may be purchased by the project from HealthNET.

The roles and responsibilities of other relevant University of Florida entities include: • OAT (Office of Academic Technology): OAT Classroom Support will participate in the design and specification of

classroom instructional spaces and associated audio/visual and information technology systems. They will also meet with the User Group during program verification to determine classroom needs. The Health Science Center, Office of Academic Information Systems & Support will support the OAT for Health Science Center projects.

• OIT Computing and Network Services (CNS) – Telecommunications and Network Infrastructure (TNI): CNS-TNI will participate in the design and specification of all communications rooms, cable pathways, and data network cables. They will also meet with the User Group during program verification to determine their network needs. HealthNET will perform this function for Health Science Center projects.

During Program Verification and the earliest stages of design, the design team and contractor shall produce a matrix of all Furnishings & Equipment, telecommunications, I/T, and audio/visual items to be provided under this program. The consultants shall then work with the Owner to refine this matrix to clearly establish the costs for, and responsibility for, each item.

UAA-34 XI-1

CODES AND STANDARDS

Design and construction at the University of Florida is regulated, reviewed, and permitted by the Division of Environmental Health & Safety (EH&S), which serves as the Authority Having Jurisdiction and the liaison with the State Fire Marshal. Consult the EH&S website (www.ehs.ufl.edu/buildcode/codes.htm) for a list of applicable codes. Early in the program verification and conceptual design process, the Professional(s) shall discuss and confirm these and other applicable codes with EH&S and, if necessary, the State Fire Marshal. Additionally, the following rules or standards apply to the design and construction of UF projects:

Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (www.usdoj.gov/crt/ada/reg3a.html) ADA Standards for Accessible Design (www.usdoj.gov/crt/ada/adastd94.pdf) HUD Fair Housing Act for Multi-Family residential Construction Florida Public Service Commission, installation and replacement of public telephones State Traffic Operations Engineer, FDOT, government parking facilities Agency for Health Care Administration, hospital and health care facilities DOE Space Standards, Chapter 6A-2, Florida Administrative Code Rules of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Regulation of OSHA and the Environmental Protection Agency Licensing regulations of Asbestos Consultants, the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation Lead-based paint minimum standards of the Department of Housing and Urban Development Florida Standard for Radon-Resistant New Commercial Building Construction http://www.doh.state.fl.us/environment/community/radon/commcnst.htm Florida Standard For Mitigation of Radon In Existing Buildings http://www.doh.state.fl.us/environment/community/radon/mtstndrd.htm Rules of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Rules of the St. Johns River Water Management District (or other agency with jurisdiction). American Society of Heating , Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) handbooks American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists Ventilation Manual American Society of Mechanical Engineers' Unfired Pressure vessel Code American Standards Institute standards (ANSI) Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Standards – www.usgbc.org City and County for off-campus projects not included in the adopted Campus Master Plan. Coordination with local utilities service provider for projects not served by the Campus utilities system. Developments of Regional Impacts for projects not included in the adopted Campus Master Plan. Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Division of Hotel and restaurants, Bureau of Elevator Inspection for

elevator inspections and permit National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for one acre or more of disturbed site in accordance with

62-621.300 (4), FAC. NPDES Stormwater Notification Center, Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) campus-wide stormwater permitting process. SJRWMD

permitting and reviews shall be coordinated through the University's SJRWMD Coordinator at PPD. Local stormwater permitting agency having jurisdiction over sites not covered in the SJRWMD campus-wide permit. University of Florida Design and Construction Standards (www.facilities.ufl.edu/dcs/index.htm) University of Florida Telecommunication Construction Standard (http://net-services.ufl.edu/infrastructure/) Low Voltage Contractor Pre-qualification Requirement & Pre-qualified Contractor List (http://net-services.ufl.edu/infrastructure/teleco_standards.html) University of Florida Design Services Guide (http://www.facilities.ufl.edu/pdf/DSG.pdf) University of Florida General Terms & Conditions University of Florida Classroom Design Standards

UAA-34 XII-1

PROJECT SCHEDULE

The following schedule is provided for long-range planning purposes only. Short-listed Architect and Construction Manager Teams will be expected to develop and present a detailed, realistic design schedule during the interview that will serve as the basis for development of a comprehensive project schedule during contract negotiations. Once the project schedule is established, long range planning for the use of this facility will take place. Consequently, strict adherence to the agreed-upon project schedule is required.

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PROJECT DELIVERY METHOD

GOALS AND MILESTONES START DATE END DATE DURATION PROGRAM APPROVAL 04-May-2014 22-Jun-2014 7 weeks 0.1 Years Facilities Program Development 04-May-2014 22-Jun-2014 7 weeks University Committees Review of Program 22-Jun-2014 22-Jun-2014 0 weeks University Facilities Program Approval 22-Jun-2014 22-Jun-2014 0 weeks A/E SELECTION PROCESS 22-Jun-2014 17-Aug-2014 8 weeks 0.2 Years Advertise for A/E in FAW 22-Jun-2014 20-Jul-2014 4 weeks A/E Short-list 20-Jul-2014 27-Jul-2014 1 weeks A/E Interviews 27-Jul-2014 10-Aug-2014 2 weeks A/E Selection Approval 10-Aug-2014 17-Aug-2014 1 weeks Contract Negotiations with A/E 17-Aug-2014 17-Aug-2014 0 weeks PRE-DESIGN PHASE 17-Aug-2014 24-Aug-2014 1 weeks 0.0 Years Letter of Activation 17-Aug-2014 24-Aug-2014 1 weeks Program Verification and Site Analysis 24-Aug-2014 21-Sep-2014 4 weeks Measured Drawings and Building Survey 24-Aug-2014 24-Aug-2014 0 weeks Site Survey 24-Aug-2014 24-Aug-2014 0 weeks Geotechnical Study 24-Aug-2014 24-Aug-2014 0 weeks C/M SELECTION PROCESS 29-Jun-2014 24-Aug-2014 8 weeks 0.2 Years Advertise for C/M in FAW 29-Jun-2014 27-Jul-2014 4 weeks C/M Short-list 27-Jul-2014 03-Aug-2014 1 weeks C/M Interviews 03-Aug-2014 17-Aug-2014 2 weeks C/M Selection 17-Aug-2014 24-Aug-2014 1 weeks Contract negotiations with C/M 24-Aug-2014 24-Aug-2014 0 weeks DESIGN PHASE 24-Aug-2014 03-May-2015 36 weeks 0.7 Years Conceptual Design 24-Aug-2014 07-Sep-2014 2 weeks Conceptual Design review and approval 07-Sep-2014 05-Oct-2014 4 weeks University Committees Review of Concept 07-Sep-2014 05-Oct-2014 4 weeks Schematic Design 05-Oct-2014 19-Oct-2014 2 weeks Schematic Design review and approval 19-Oct-2014 02-Nov-2014 2 weeks Design Development and Budget verification 02-Nov-2014 30-Nov-2014 4 weeks Design Development review and approval 30-Nov-2014 14-Dec-2014 2 weeks University Committees Review of Design 30-Nov-2014 28-Dec-2014 4 weeks Design Review submittal to State Fire Marshal (SFM) 30-Nov-2014 28-Dec-2014 4 weeks 60% Construction Documents and Budget update 14-Dec-2014 11-Jan-2015 4 weeks 60% Construction Documents review and approval 11-Jan-2015 25-Jan-2015 2 weeks

Submittal of GMP 16-Dec-2014 20-Dec-2014 4 weeks

Fast-tracked (less complex)

100% Construction Documents and Budget update 25-Jan-2015 08-Feb-2015 2 weeks

Fast-tracked (complex project)

100% Construction Documents review and approval 08-Feb-2015 08-Mar-2015 4 weeks Design Review submittal to State Fire Marshal (SFM) 08-Mar-2015 22-Mar-2015 2 weeks CONSTRUCTION PHASE 08-Mar-2015 05-Apr-2015 4 weeks Notice to Proceed 05-Apr-2015 17-Jan-2016 41 weeks 0.8 Years Bid Package Submittal and Review 05-Apr-2015 12-Apr-2015 1 weeks Approval to advertise bid package 05-Apr-2015 03-May-2015 4 weeks

UAA-34 XIII-1

Construction 05-Apr-2015 12-Apr-2015 1 weeks Contractor Punch & Clean 05-Apr-2015 27-Dec-2015 38 weeks Substantial Completion Inspection 20-Dec-2015 27-Dec-2015 1 weeks Punch list Corrective Work 27-Dec-2015 03-Jan-2016 1 weeks Owner Occupancy 03-Jan-2016 10-Jan-2016 1 weeks Final Completion Inspection 03-Jan-2016 10-Jan-2016 1 weeks Total 10-Jan-2016 17-Jan-2016 1 weeks 04-May-2014 17-Jan-2016 89 weeks 1.7 Years

Fast-Tracked Process: Begin construction at acceptance of GMP with early release of foundation/civil bid package. CONSTRUCTION PHASE 08-Feb-2015 22-Nov-2015 41 weeks Notice to Proceed 08-Feb-2015 15-Feb-2015 1 weeks Bid Package Submittal and Review 08-Feb-2015 08-Mar-2015 4 weeks Construction 08-Feb-2015 01-Nov-2015 38 weeks Contractor Punch & Clean 25-Oct-2015 01-Nov-2015 1 weeks Substantial Completion Inspection 01-Nov-2015 08-Nov-2015 1 weeks Punchlist Corrective Work 08-Nov-2015 15-Nov-2015 1 weeks Owner Occupancy 08-Nov-2015 08-Nov-2015 0 weeks

Final Completion Inspection 15-Nov-2015 22-Nov-2015 1 weeks

Total 17-Aug-2014 22-Nov-2015 66 weeks 1.3 Years

Renovation of Existing Building CONSTRUCTION PHASE 10-Feb-2016 17-Aug-2016 27 weeks Notice to Proceed 10-Feb-2016 17-Feb-2016 1 weeks Bid Package Submittal and Review 10-Feb-2016 17-Feb-2016 1 weeks Construction 10-Feb-2016 03-Aug-2016 25 weeks Contractor Punch & Clean 27-Jul-2016 03-Aug-2016 1 weeks Substantial Completion Inspection 03-Aug-2016 10-Aug-2016 1 weeks Punchlist Corrective Work 10-Aug-2016 17-Aug-2016 1 weeks Owner Occupancy 10-Aug-2016 17-Aug-2016 1 weeks

Final Completion Inspection 17-Aug-2016 17-Aug-2016 0 weeks

Total 10-Feb-2016 17-Aug-2016 27 weeks 0.5 Years

UAA-34 XIII-2

PROGRAM FUNDS

A. ESTIMATED FUNDING

CONSTRUCTION FUNDING Public Education Capital Outlay $ 0.00 FECG Matching Funds $ 0.00 UAA funded project $25,000,000.00 Sub-Total $25,000,000.00 PLANNING FUNDING $ 0.00 Sub-Total $ 0.00 EQUIPMENT FUNDING $ 0.00 Sub-Total $ 0.00 OPERATING EXPENSES FUNDING $ 0.00 Sub-Total $ 0.00 TOTAL PROJECT FUND $25,000,000.00

B. ESTIMATED BUDGET

1 DESIGN, PLANNING & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT $1,902,800.00 2 CONSTRUCTION $16,692,900.00 3 FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT $1,869,200.00 4 ART WORK $ 0.00 5 CONTINGENCIES $4,482,900.00 TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET (from Section XV of Facilities Program) $25,000,000.00

UAA-34 XIV-1

PROJECT BUDGET SUMMARY

The total project budget is $25,000,000.00 with an estimated construction budget of approximately $16,692,900.00. This project is funded by UAA. The University expects the A/E to develop design and construction documents that are consistent with the established budget, facilities program, OPR, UF Design & Construction Standards, and Design Services Guide. This obligation is mandatory. If estimates by a CM, the A/E or its cost consultant, or a 3rd-party cost consultant indicate a construction cost that exceeds the budget, the A/E shall work with the University and its consultants to modify the design to conform to the budget. However, the design may not vary from the program or the UF Design & Construction Standards without University approval. During the construction documents phase, provisions for additive alternates, as required, shall be included to ensure that the basic program scope is realized and to maximize opportunities for the inclusion of long-term infrastructure flexibility.

PROJECT SPACE SUMMARY

CONSTRUCTION BUDGET was developed using (check one):

Major Space Type Basis Offices

Benchmark Data Study

Assumed Bid Date: February, 2015

SPACE SUMMATION (from Section IX of Facilities Program) Program Space Type NASF Factor 1 GSF $ / GSF 2 $

New Construction

Office service 7,800 1.3 10,140 200.33 $2,031,363.44

Auditorium/Exhibit

Office service 7,800 1.3 10,140 200.33 $2,031,363.44

Auditorium/Exhibit 2,400 1.2 2,880 208.13 $599,401.56

Student Academic, study rooms 4,200 1.5

6,300 172.32 $1,085,601.44

Support Services 9,090 1.4 12,726 165.79 $2,109,882.80

Avg. Construction Cost 3 181.78

Total Construction Cost 32,290 1.4

45,246 $8,225,014

1. NASF (Net Assignable Square Feet) to GSF (Gross Square Feet) Conversion Factor. 2. Based on cost models and projections and assumed bid date. 3. Insert predominant space type factor used for calculating overall $ / GSF.

UAA-34 XV-1

(Renovation) NASF Facto

r GSF $ / GSF

* $

Offices 5,306

1.5 7,959

163.55

$1,301,711.39

Office service 2,462

1.4 3,447

180.30

$621,452.97

Auditorium/Exhibit 4,295

1.4 6,013

210.45

$1,265,459.71

Student Academic, study rooms

6,570

1.2 7,884

187.31

$1,476,775.58

Support Services 7,090

1.4 9,926

149.21

$1,481,095.94

Avg. Construction Cost 174.47

Total Construction Cost

25,723

1.4 35,229

$6,146,496

PROJECT BUDGET SUMMARY

1 DESIGN, PLANNING & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT a. Professional Fees $1,299,100.00 b. State Fire Marshal Review and Inspection $41,700.00 c. Permit/Impact/Environmental Fees $55,200.00 Parking mitigation $215,000.00 2 CONSTRUCTION a. Basic Building Construction Cost $15,228,200.00 b. Additional/Extraordinary Construction Cost $1,464,700.00 3 FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT $1,870,000.00 4 ART WORK $0.00 5 CONTINGENCIES a. Land/Existing Facility Acquisition

b. Owner Basic Contingency $2,500,000.00

c. Owner Design Contingency $1,500,000.00

TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET $25,000,000.00

UAA-34 XV-2

EXHIBITS

A. UNIVERSITY COMMITTEES REVIEW

LAND USE AND FACILITIES PLANNING COMMITTEE

July 1, 2014 PRESERVATION OF HISTORIC BUILDINGS AND SITES COMMITTEE JUNE 17, 2014 LAKES, VEGETATION AND LANDSCAPE COMMITTEE

June 9, 2014 TRANSPORTATION AND PARKING ADVISORY COMMITTEE

June 10, 2014

UAA-34 XVI-1

UAA-34; Owner’s Project Requirements (OPR) Template revised November 2009

17.1 Introduction 17.2 Owner Requirements Covered Elsewhere 17.3 Project-Specific Design Goals 17.4 Occupancy & Use 17.5 Sustainability and Energy Efficiency 17.6 Building Site 17.7 Transportation & Parking 17.8 Building Envelope 17.9 Indoor Environmental Quality

17.10 Emergency or Backup Power 17.11 Telecommunications and A/V Systems 17.12 Security 17.13 Hazardous Materials 17.14 Furnishings & Equipment 17.15 Commissioning, Inspection, and Q.A. 17.16 Construction Completion & Turnover 17.17 Operation & Maintenance 17.18 Owner Training 17.19 Post-Occupancy and Warranty

17.1 INTRODUCTION Along with the other sections of this Facilities Program, this Owner’s Project Requirements (OPR) document outlines functional requirements of the project and expectations of how the facility and its systems will be used and operated. The OPR is required for LEED certification of the project, but also serves three broader vital purposes: 1. Provides the design team with information necessary to develop the Basis of Design (BOD) during

program verification and/or schematic design, which serves as a “road map” for development of the design and construction documents.

2. Provides the commissioning (Cx) team with tangible benchmarks to measure success & quality and

confirm that the building and systems constructed align with the University’s expectations and requirements.

3. Serves, along with the BOD and contractor deliverables such as “as-built” documents, as the

foundation for the Systems Manual outlined below. The Owner will develop and update the OPR through program verification and schematic design, or until the Cx consultant is selected. The Cx consultant will then assume responsibility for refining and augmenting the OPR throughout design, construction, and the post-occupancy period of one year following Substantial Completion of construction. As decisions are made during the life of the project, this document shall be updated to reflect the current requirements of the University. The Owner is the University of Florida Board of Trustees (UF). Primary users and stakeholders include UF Business Affairs, Athletic Association, and other university entities. The entity responsible for project management and delivery is UF Planning, Design & Construction (PDC). The organization responsible for

UAA-34 XVII-1

UAA-34; Owner’s Project Requirements (OPR) Template revised November 2009

operation and maintenance of the facility is the University's Physical Plant Division (PPD). to be verified with UAA during the design.

17.2 OWNER REQUIREMENTS COVERED ELSEWHERE Many components of, or related to, the OPR are covered elsewhere in the Facilities Program, including: Detailed project history, background, and justification – Section IV General planning and design objectives – Section IV Relationship to Campus Master Plan – Section VII Existing site conditions & constraints – Section VIII Project space types, sizes, and adjacencies – Section IX Finishes, M/E/P, telecomm and A/V, and acoustic requirements by space or space type – Section IX Distributed and site underground utilities – Section X Applicable codes – Section XII Project schedule and budget – Sections XIII and XV Additional requirements, expectations, and standards for UF projects are detailed in the following: UF Design & Construction Standards – www.facilities.ufl.edu UF Telecommunications Standards – http://net-services.ufl.edu/infrastructure/ Design Services Guide – www.facilities.ufl.edu UF Energy Policies, Rates, Provisions – www.ppd.ufl.edu/pdf/UFUtilityPolicy.pdf UF Environmental Health & Safety – www.ehs.ufl.edu

17.3 PROJECT-SPECIFIC DESIGN GOALS 1. Flexibility and Future Expansion Design interior space to be flexible for different function. Special attention to be paid to design the MEP systems for energy efficincy. Review of the telecommunications to support the most updated UF and UAA

telecommunication standards and requirement. 2. Quality and Context The addition must be impressive and contextually fits the surrounding buildings. Special attention to be paid to the traffic circulation around this new building. High level of attention to the performance and esthetics of the facility is warranted. Interior space must provide a superior indoor environment to facilitate occupant’s comfort and

productivity with high indoor air quality and proper acoustics.

17.4 OCCUPANCY & USE Describe the anticipated hours of operation, occupancy schedule(s), etc. The building will be occupied from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on week days.

Describe the occupants - number, type, transient vs. permanent, etc. Permanent occupants include obtain this info from user group during the early design.

UAA-34 XVII-2

UAA-34; Owner’s Project Requirements (OPR) Template revised November 2009

Elaborate on any other special occupancy or usage goals, requirements ... Only student advisement will be in this building.

17.5 SUSTAINABILITY and ENERGY EFFICIENCY As part of an overall commitment to sustainability and a goal of achieving “carbon neutrality” by the year 2025, the University of Florida builds its facilities to last and promotes environmental quality and resource conservation through sustainable design and construction. See www.sustainable.ufl.edu. As part of that commitment and to demonstrate that the facility was designed and constructed to be energy-efficient and environmentally sustainable, University projects must be certified by the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) through its Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) process. See www.usgbc.org and www.facilities.ufl.edu/sustain. This project shall achieve LEED-BD+C, V4 certification at no lower than Gold level, and the team is encouraged to pursue Platinum. Specific, high-priority goals for this project include: Maximization of the HVAC and the Energy performance as a first priority. The facility shall operate

at a minimum of 40% higher efficiency than ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2010. Incorporation of strategies, measures, and systems to conserve energy, such as heat/enthalpy

wheels, energy recovery units, “setback” modes, etc. Utilization of the Building Automation System and other controls to efficiently maintain and track

performance of key building systems, particularly HVAC and lighting. See UF Design & Construction Standard 15950.

Optimization of variable-flow chilled water systems for maximum building and plant efficiency Use of low-VOC, regionally-available, and high recycled content materials. Specify recycled content material. Innovate in water conservation strategies. The Basis of Design (BOD) shall establish specific plans and strategies for achieving these goals, and the construction documents shall include requirements for LEED submittals and sustainable construction practices and techniques, including: Segregated collection and recycling of construction waste Proper erosion and sedimentation control techniques Procurement and use of low-VOC, regionally-available, and high recycled content materials The BOD shall also address the USGBC document entitled “Required Treatment of District Thermal Energy and its applicability to LEED certification of this project. The enclosed LEED matrix provides the University’s pre-design estimate of the probability of securing each credit – high, medium, or low. During program verification and/or conceptual schematic design, the project team will review and update this spreadsheet in order to firmly establish sustainability goals for the project. The matrix will be continuously maintained by the University throughout design and construction as a guideline for achieving LEED certification and tracking progress and action items. Duke Energy – the University’s primary electric and steam provider – has established a rebate program for certain components of new construction that meet energy efficiency requirements, including: lighting motors

UAA-34 XVII-3

UAA-34; Owner’s Project Requirements (OPR) Template revised November 2009

energy recovery ventilation solar, green, or cool roofs demand control ventilation compressed air system

high efficient chillers occupancy sensors thermal energy storage

To verify compliance and confirm which rebates apply to this project, Duke Energy will review the 100% Construction Documents and final energy model and will inspect the building at completion. Specific portions of the final MEP drawings/schedules, energy model, and other information will be used by Duke Energy to perform calculations necessary to determine the rebate for each project. The University expects all components of this project/building to be the most efficient and highest quality systems in order to qualify for these rebates.

17.6 BUILDING SITE The project is gut rehab to the existing building and addition of 45K SF of new building. The new addition will be south of the existing building. Consideration must be given to the vegetation on the site for new addition and tree protection is required.

17.7 TRANSPORTATION & PARKING This scope of this project will impact about 43 parking spaces in a gated parking lot. The traffic flow for pedestrian and bicycles must be addressed and integrated into the project design.

17.8 BUILDING ENVELOPE The exterior shall be designed to endure for at least 75 years. Selection of materials and detailing of envelope systems shall be consistent with the Florida Building Code and UF Design & Construction Standards; performance-based to allow the building to withstand weather conditions typical of North Central Florida; and esthetically consistent with the area of campus where the facility will be constructed. Prevention of moisture intrusion is a high-priority goal applicable to all project team disciplines. Solar transmission shall be controlled and designed in accordance with ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2010 through high-performance, low-e glazing, overhangs and external shading, and other techniques to minimize solar heat gain and maximize light transmittance for daylighting where functionally practical. Roofs – anticipated being replaced with reflective roofing and easy to maintain.

17.9

17.10 INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 1. Indoor Lighting and Lighting Controls

Efficient lighting must be integrated into the project including athletic rooms, dressing rooms, arena, retails, and the remaining project.

2. Thermal Comfort

Building temperature set points should be established as 74oF – 76oF for Summer and 72oF – 74oF for Winter. Design to meet the function of the building with offices, retails, meeting rooms, and arena.

UAA-34 XVII-4

UAA-34; Owner’s Project Requirements (OPR) Template revised November 2009

3. Ventilation and Filtration

Meet ASHRAE 62.1, 2010 requirement. Also, address the ventilation requirement for this type of building.

4. Acoustics Design to address acoustical requirement for this type of building.

5. IAQ Pre- occupancy IAQ testing will be performed by EH&S.

17.11 EMERGENCY, BACKUP, or ‘CLEAN’ POWER Not required for this building. Verify with the Owner during the design.

17.12 TELECOMMUNICATIONS and AUDIO/VISUAL SYSTEMS Wireless access shall be provided throughout the building and at any defined outdoor gathering spaces. Consult with building occupant and specifically UAA on the needs for the athletics programs and for the other events and activities in the building. Also see section XI of this facilities program.

17.13 SECURITY Security and access to the building must meet University’s requirement.

17.14 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS None is reported for this building. .

17.15 FURNISHINGS & EQUIPMENT All office furniture, lounge, and meeting rooms furniture is part of the project. Furniture installation must be coordinated with the CM, and all data and power to furniture must be included in the design.

17.16 COMMISSIONING, INSPECTION, and QUALITY ASSURANCE The Commissioning (Cx) consultant will be independent of the design and construction teams, will be selected by the Conceptual Schematic phase, and will be responsible for maintenance of this OPR and BOD; peer review of the design and construction documents; development of the project-specific Cx specification using the University’s template “non-technical” spec; development of the project-specific Cx Plan; construction and acceptance phase commissioning and documentation; development of the facility’s Systems Manual; and post-occupancy commissioning, testing, and documentation. It is anticipated that the following building systems will be commissioned: Mechanical and HVAC systems Electrical and lighting systems Domestic hot water systems

UAA-34 XVII-5

UAA-34; Owner’s Project Requirements (OPR) Template revised November 2009

Building envelope systems Renewable energy systems The following items of particular interest to the University shall be addressed and verified by the Cx consultant throughout the term of service: 1. Meeting or exceeding “Delta-T” minimums across cooling coils for campus chilled water 2. Accuracy of utilities metering and integration of same with the Building Automation System (BAS) 3. Measurement & Verification of energy usage, performance, and efficiency Onsite inspection of life safety, code compliance, and ADA-related items will be conducted by the University’s Division of Environmental Health & Safety (EH&S) and the State Fire Marshal. See www.ehs.ufl.edu for more information. Onsite inspection of systems and components governed by the UF Design & Construction Standards and the UF Telecommunications Standards will be conducted, respectively, by the University's Physical Plant Division (PPD) and Office of Information Technology (OIT). The detailed scope of Cx services shall complement these inspections to eliminate gaps or “double coverage” in field oversight. The facility is anticipated to be a “threshold” building as defined by the FL Building Code. The University will hire a qualified "special inspector" directly or as an additional design service to perform the onsite inspection and oversight services required for such "threshold" facilities. The distributed utilities system employed on the main UF campus may necessitate partial commissioning of the energy plant(s) serving the new facility and/or collection of energy efficiency data from PPD. See the USGBC document entitled “Required Treatment of District Thermal Energy in LEED-NC,” dated 5/22/08.

17.17 CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION and TURNOVER Inspection, testing, and commissioning culminate in a declaration of Substantial Completion by UF. This date establishes both the beginning of the warranty period and commencement of operation and maintenance by UF. Details on the closeout of major projects can be found on the FPC website. Move-in of occupants and their personal belongings will not take place until all Substantial Completion “punchlist” items are completed.

17.18 OPERATION & MAINTENANCE The entity responsible for maintenance and operation of the building and its systems, beginning on the date of Substantial Completion, is Physical Plant Division (PPD). Verify this with the Owner during design. In addition to the Cx Plan, field reports, and test reports, the Cx consultant’s primary deliverable is a Systems Manual as required for LEED E/A Credit 3 (Enhanced Commissioning). This manual provides the University with a single source of information and instructions for proper operation and maintenance of primary building systems. As opposed to equipment-oriented “O&M manuals,” the Systems Manual is to be systems-oriented to provide operators with easy access to both narrative and technically detailed reference material, descriptions, diagrams, schedules, and other information on stand-alone and, particularly, integrated systems.

UAA-34 XVII-6

UAA-34; Owner’s Project Requirements (OPR) Template revised November 2009

Like the OPR and BOD, the Systems Manual should be a living document. Unlike the OPR and BOD, though, the Systems Manual should evolve throughout the life of the building – complied by the Cx from documentation developed by the owner, design team, contractors, and the Cx process itself, then turned over for perpetual use and upkeep by building operators and future consultants and contractors throughout the building's life.

17.19 OWNER TRAINING Onsite training for the Owner including PPD and O’Dome Staff– whether operators/maintainers or users/occupants – shall include a description and overview of systems, not just the components and equipment that comprise each system. Training – which is ideally held in conjunction with commissioning – should include general orientation and reviews of the written O&M instructions, relevant health and safety issues or concerns, operation in all possible modes, preventive maintenance, and common troubleshooting problems & solutions. Building systems that the maintenance entity shall be trained on include: HVAC systems BAS/controls Electrical systems Lighting controls Security system Building systems that the occupants/users shall be trained on include: Lighting controls Audio/visual (A/V system Most training shall be completed prior to Substantial Completion, and all sessions shall be videotaped and converted to DVD format for the Owner’s use.

17.20 POST-OCCUPANCY and WARRANTY The Cx consultant, CM/GC, and all subcontractors whose systems were commissioned shall meet with the Owner’s O&M staff quarterly during the first year after Substantial Completion to offseason test, optimize, and otherwise troubleshoot all commissioned systems. Also, an onsite meeting will be conducted 10-11 months after Substantial Completion to review performance and quality of the facility with all effected parties – UF occupants & users, O&M staff, the design team, and the contractor and its subcontractors. Occupant survey will be conducted for thermal and lighting comfort before the one year warrantee is conducted.

UAA-34 XVII-7

LEED v4 for BD+C: New Construction and Major RenovationProject Checklist

Y ? N

Credi 1

Possible Points: Credit 1

1 Credit 22 Credit 35 Credit 45 Credit 51 Credit 61 Credit 71 Credit 8 Green Vehicles

Possible Points: Y Prereq 1 1 Credit 12 Credit 21 Credit 33 Credit 42 Credit 5

1 Credit 6

Possible Points: Y Prereq 1Y Prereq 2Y Prereq 3 Building-Level Water Metering2 Credit 14 Credit 2

2 Credit 31 Credit 4 Water Metering

Possible Points: Y Prereq 1Y Prereq 2Y Prereq 3Y Prereq 46 Credit 115 Credit 2

Fundamental Commissioning and Verification

Fundamental Refrigerant Management

Minimum Energy PerformanceBuilding-Level Energy Metering

Cooling Tower Water Use

Optimize Energy Performance

Energy and Atmosphere

Indoor Water Use Reduction

Open Space

Enhanced Commissioning

Integrative Process

Construction Activity Pollution Prevention

High Priority SiteSurrounding Density and Diverse UsesAccess to Quality Transit

Reduced Parking Footprint

Sustainable Sites

Bicycle Facilities

Rainwater Management

Light Pollution ReductionHeat Island Reduction

Outdoor Water Use ReductionIndoor Water Use Reduction

Outdoor Water Use ReductionWater Efficiency

Site AssessmentSite Development--Protect or Restore Habitat

Project Name; UAA-34, OSLDate; 5/29/2014

Location and Transportation

Sensitive Land ProtectionLEED for Neighborhood Development Location

1 Credit 32 Credit 4

Credit 51 Credit 62 Credit 7

Possible Points: Y Prereq 1 Y Prereq 2 5 Credit 12 Credit 22 Credit 32 Credit 4 Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Material Ingredients 2 Credit 5

Indoor Environmental Quality Possible Points: Y Prereq 1 Y Prereq 2 2 Credit 13 Credit 2 1 Credit 3 Construction Indoor Air Quality Management Plan2 Credit 41 Credit 52 Credit 63 Credit 71 Credit 81 Credit 9

Innovation Possible Points: 1 Credit 11 Credit 2

Regional Priority Possible Points: 1 Credit 1 Regional Priority: Specific Credit1 Credit 2 Regional Priority: Specific Credit1 Credit 3 Regional Priority: Specific Credit1 Credit 4 Regional Priority: Specific Credit

78 Total Possible Points:

Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Environmental Product Dec

Certified 40 to 49 points Silver 50 to 59 points Gold 60 to 79 points Platinu

Advanced Energy Metering

Thermal Comfort

Acoustic Performance

Interior LightingDaylight

LEED Accredited Professional

Construction and Demolition Waste Management

Minimum Indoor Air Quality PerformanceEnvironmental Tobacco Smoke Control

Construction and Demolition Waste Management Planning

Materials and ResourcesStorage and Collection of Recyclables

Quality Views

Enhanced Indoor Air Quality StrategiesLow-Emitting Materials

Indoor Air Quality Assessment

Demand ResponseRenewable Energy ProductionEnhanced Refrigerant Management

Innovation

Building Life-Cycle Impact Reduction

Green Power and Carbon Offsets

Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Sourcing of Raw Materials

1

16161255111

10Required

121321

11RequiredRequiredRequired

2621

33RequiredRequiredRequiredRequired

618

12312

13RequiredRequired

52222

16RequiredRequired

231212311

651

41111

110 um 80 to 110

LEED v4 for BD+C: Core and ShellProject Checklist

Y ? N

Credi 1 1

Possible Points: 20Credit 1 20

Credit 2 2

Credit 3 3

Credit 4 6

Credit 5 6

Credit 6 1

Credit 7 1

Credit 8 Green Vehicles 1

Possible Points: 11Y Prereq 1 Required

Credit 1 1

Credit 2 2

Credit 3 1

Credit 4 3

Credit 5 2

Credit 6 1

Credit 7 Tenant Design and Construction Guidelines 1

Possible Points: 11Y Prereq 1 Required

Y Prereq 2 Required

Y Prereq 3 Building-Level Water Metering Required

Credit 1 2

Credit 2 6

Credit 3 2

Credit 4 Water Metering 1

Possible Points: 33Y Prereq 1 Required

Y Prereq 2 Required

Y Prereq 3 Required

Y Prereq 4 Required

Credit 1 6

Credit 2 18

Credit 3 1

Credit 4 2

Credit 5 3

Credit 6 1

Fundamental Refrigerant Management

Enhanced Commissioning

Demand Response

Renewable Energy Production

Sensitive Land Protection

High Priority Site

Sustainable Sites

Site Development--Protect or Restore Habitat

Open Space

Water Efficiency

Light Pollution Reduction

Rainwater Management

Surrounding Density and Diverse Uses

Access to Quality Transit

Project Name

Date

Integrative Process

Location and Transportation

Enhanced Refrigerant Management

Outdoor Water Use Reduction

Indoor Water Use Reduction

Bicycle Facilities

Construction Activity Pollution Prevention

Outdoor Water Use Reduction

Energy and Atmosphere

LEED for Neighborhood Development Location

Minimum Energy Performance

Indoor Water Use Reduction

Cooling Tower Water Use

Heat Island Reduction

Reduced Parking Footprint

Site Assessment

Optimize Energy Performance

Advanced Energy Metering

Fundamental Commissioning and Verification

Building-Level Energy Metering

Credit 7 2

Possible Points: 14Y Prereq 1 Required

Y Prereq 2 Required

Credit 1 6

Credit 2 2

Credit 3 2

Credit 4 Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Material Ingredients 2

Credit 5 2

Indoor Environmental Quality Possible Points: 10Y Prereq 1 Required

Y Prereq 2 Required

Credit 1 2

Credit 2 3

Credit 3 Construction Indoor Air Quality Management Plan 1

Credit 5 3

Credit 6 1

Innovation Possible Points: 6Credit 1 5

Credit 2 1

Regional Priority Possible Points: 4Credit 1 Regional Priority: Specific Credit 1

Credit 2 Regional Priority: Specific Credit 1

Credit 3 Regional Priority: Specific Credit 1

Credit 4 Regional Priority: Specific Credit 1

Total Possible Points: 110

Innovation

LEED Accredited Professional

Certified 40 to 49 points Silver 50 to 59 points Gold 60 to 79 points Platinum 80 to 110

Construction and Demolition Waste Management Planning

Building Life-Cycle Impact Reduction

Construction and Demolition Waste Management

Minimum Indoor Air Quality Performance

Environmental Tobacco Smoke Control

Daylight

Quality Views

Enhanced Indoor Air Quality Strategies

Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Sourcing of Raw Materials

Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Environmental Product Declarations

Storage and Collection of Recyclables

Green Power and Carbon Offsets

Low-Emitting Materials

Materials and Resources

LEED v4 for BD+C: Schools Project Checklist

Y ? N

Credi 1 1

Possible Points: 15Credit 1 15

Credit 2 1

Credit 3 2

Credit 4 5

Credit 5 4

Credit 6 1

Credit 7 1

Credit 8 Green Vehicles 1

Possible Points: 12Y Prereq 1 Required

Y Prereq 2 Required

Credit 1 1

Credit 2 2

Credit 3 1

Credit 4 3

Credit 5 2

Credit 6 1

Credit 7 1

Credit 8 Joint Use of Facilities 1

Possible Points: 12Y Prereq 1 Required

Y Prereq 2 Required

Y Prereq 3 Building-Level Water Metering Required

Credit 1 2

Credit 2 7

Credit 3 2

Credit 4 Water Metering 1

Possible Points: 31Y Prereq 1 Required

Y Prereq 2 Required

Y Prereq 3 Required

Y Prereq 4 Required

Credit 1 6

Credit 2 16

Credit 3 1

Credit 4 2

Location and Transportation

Outdoor Water Use Reduction

Demand Response

Water Efficiency

Building-Level Energy Metering

Outdoor Water Use Reduction

Rainwater Management

Cooling Tower Water Use

Access to Quality Transit

Reduced Parking Footprint

Environmental Site Assessment

Site Assessment

Construction Activity Pollution Prevention

Site Master Plan

Site Development--Protect or Restore Habitat

Integrative Process

Indoor Water Use Reduction

Energy and AtmosphereFundamental Commissioning and Verification

Sensitive Land Protection

Open Space

Project Name

Date

Optimize Energy Performance

Fundamental Refrigerant Management

Enhanced Commissioning

Light Pollution Reduction

LEED for Neighborhood Development Location

Indoor Water Use Reduction

High Priority Site

Surrounding Density and Diverse Uses

Bicycle Facilities

Sustainable Sites

Advanced Energy Metering

Minimum Energy Performance

Heat Island Reduction

Credit 5 3

Credit 6 1

Credit 7 2

Possible Points: 13Y Prereq 1 Required

Y Prereq 2 Required

Credit 1 5

Credit 2 2

Credit 3 2

Credit 4 Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Material Ingredients 2

Credit 5 2

Indoor Environmental Quality Possible Points: 16Y Prereq 1 Required

Y Prereq 2 Required

Y Prereq 3 Required

Credit 1 2

Credit 2 3

Credit 3 1

Credit 4 2

Credit 5 1

Credit 6 2

Credit 7 3

Credit 8 1

Credit 9 1

Innovation Possible Points: 6Credit 1 5

Credit 2 1

Regional Priority Possible Points: 4Credit 1 Regional Priority: Specific Credit 1

Credit 2 Regional Priority: Specific Credit 1

Credit 3 Regional Priority: Specific Credit 1

Credit 4 Regional Priority: Specific Credit 1

Total Possible Points: 110

Renewable Energy Production

Enhanced Refrigerant Management

Certified 40 to 49 points Silver 50 to 59 points Gold 60 to 79 points Platinum 80 to 110

Construction Indoor Air Quality Management Plan

Storage and Collection of Recyclables

Construction and Demolition Waste Management Planning

Environmental Tobacco Smoke Control

Minimum Acoustic Performance

Enhanced Indoor Air Quality Strategies

Building Life-Cycle Impact Reduction

Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Environmental Product Declarations

Construction and Demolition Waste Management

Low-Emitting Materials

Green Power and Carbon Offsets

Minimum Indoor Air Quality Performance

Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Sourcing of Raw Materials

Materials and Resources

LEED Accredited Professional

Indoor Air Quality Assessment

Interior Lighting

Acoustic Performance

Daylight

Quality Views

Innovation

Thermal Comfort

LEED v4 for BD+C: RetailProject Checklist

Y ? N

Credi 1 1

Possible Points: 16Credit 1 16

Credit 2 1

Credit 3 2

Credit 4 5

Credit 5 5

Credit 6 1

Credit 7 1

Credit 8 Green Vehicles 1

Possible Points: 10Y Prereq 1 Required

Credit 1 1

Credit 2 2

Credit 3 1

Credit 4 3

Credit 5 2

Credit 6 1

Possible Points: 12Y Prereq 1 Required

Y Prereq 2 Required

Y Prereq 3 Building-Level Water Metering Required

Credit 1 2

Credit 2 7

Credit 3 2

Credit 4 Water Metering 1

Possible Points: 33Y Prereq 1 Required

Y Prereq 2 Required

Y Prereq 3 Required

Y Prereq 4 Required

Credit 1 6

Credit 2 18

Credit 3 1

Credit 4 2

Credit 5 3

Credit 6 1

Credit 7 2

Open Space

Water Efficiency

Outdoor Water Use Reduction

Indoor Water Use Reduction

Energy and Atmosphere

Enhanced Commissioning

Project Name

Date

Surrounding Density and Diverse Uses

Access to Quality Transit

Bicycle Facilities

Integrative Process

Location and Transportation

Sensitive Land Protection

High Priority Site

LEED for Neighborhood Development Location

Reduced Parking Footprint

Indoor Water Use Reduction

Site Assessment

Heat Island Reduction

Fundamental Commissioning and Verification

Light Pollution Reduction

Construction Activity Pollution Prevention

Sustainable Sites

Site Development--Protect or Restore Habitat

Enhanced Refrigerant Management

Fundamental Refrigerant Management

Rainwater Management

Minimum Energy Performance

Advanced Energy Metering

Building-Level Energy Metering

Cooling Tower Water Use

Outdoor Water Use Reduction

Green Power and Carbon Offsets

Demand Response

Optimize Energy Performance

Renewable Energy Production

Possible Points: 13Y Prereq 1 Required

Y Prereq 2 Required

Credit 1 5

Credit 2 2

Credit 3 2

Credit 4 Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Material Ingredients 2

Credit 5 2

Indoor Environmental Quality Possible Points: 15Y Prereq 1 Required

Y Prereq 2 Required

Credit 1 2

Credit 2 3

Credit 3 Construction Indoor Air Quality Management Plan 1

Credit 4 2

Credit 5 1

Credit 6 2

Credit 7 3

Credit 8 1

Innovation Possible Points: 6Credit 1 5

Credit 2 1

Regional Priority Possible Points: 4Credit 1 Regional Priority: Specific Credit 1

Credit 2 Regional Priority: Specific Credit 1

Credit 3 Regional Priority: Specific Credit 1

Credit 4 Regional Priority: Specific Credit 1

Total Possible Points: 110Certified 40 to 49 points Silver 50 to 59 points Gold 60 to 79 points Platinum 80 to 110

Enhanced Indoor Air Quality Strategies

Daylight

LEED Accredited Professional

Construction and Demolition Waste Management Planning

Construction and Demolition Waste Management

Thermal Comfort

Materials and ResourcesStorage and Collection of Recyclables

Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Environmental Product Declarations

Environmental Tobacco Smoke Control

Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Sourcing of Raw Materials

Innovation

Indoor Air Quality Assessment

Quality Views

Minimum Indoor Air Quality Performance

Low-Emitting Materials

Interior Lighting

Building Life-Cycle Impact Reduction

LEED v4 for BD+C: Data Centers Project Checklist

Y ? N

Credi 1 1

Possible Points: 16Credit 1 16

Credit 2 1

Credit 3 2

Credit 4 5

Credit 5 5

Credit 6 1

Credit 7 1

Credit 8 Green Vehicles 1

Possible Points: 10Y Prereq 1 Required

Credit 1 1

Credit 2 2

Credit 3 1

Credit 4 3

Credit 5 2

Credit 6 1

Possible Points: 11Y Prereq 1 Required

Y Prereq 2 Required

Y Prereq 3 Building-Level Water Metering Required

Credit 1 2

Credit 2 6

Credit 3 2

Credit 4 Water Metering 1

Possible Points: 33Y Prereq 1 Required

Y Prereq 2 Required

Y Prereq 3 Required

Y Prereq 4 Required

Credit 1 6

Credit 2 18

Credit 3 1

Credit 4 2

Credit 5 3

Credit 6 1

Credit 7 2

Water Efficiency

Outdoor Water Use Reduction

Indoor Water Use Reduction

Energy and Atmosphere

Enhanced Commissioning

Optimize Energy Performance

Outdoor Water Use Reduction

Indoor Water Use Reduction

Fundamental Commissioning and Verification

Minimum Energy Performance

Heat Island Reduction

Light Pollution Reduction

Advanced Energy Metering

Demand Response

Renewable Energy Production

Green Power and Carbon Offsets

Reduced Parking Footprint

Sensitive Land Protection

High Priority Site

Construction Activity Pollution Prevention

Site Assessment

Rainwater Management

Sustainable Sites

Site Development--Protect or Restore Habitat

Open Space

Project Name

Date

Integrative Process

Location and Transportation

Cooling Tower Water Use

LEED for Neighborhood Development Location

Surrounding Density and Diverse Uses

Access to Quality Transit

Bicycle Facilities

Building-Level Energy Metering

Fundamental Refrigerant Management

Enhanced Refrigerant Management

Possible Points: 13Y Prereq 1 Required

Y Prereq 2 Required

Credit 1 5

Credit 2 2

Credit 3 2

Credit 4 Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Material Ingredients 2

Credit 5 2

Indoor Environmental Quality Possible Points: 16Y Prereq 1 Required

Y Prereq 2 Required

Credit 1 2

Credit 2 3

Credit 3 Construction Indoor Air Quality Management Plan 1

Credit 4 2

Credit 5 1

Credit 6 2

Credit 7 3

Credit 8 1

Credit 9 1

Innovation Possible Points: 6Credit 1 5

Credit 2 1

Regional Priority Possible Points: 4Credit 1 Regional Priority: Specific Credit 1

Credit 2 Regional Priority: Specific Credit 1

Credit 3 Regional Priority: Specific Credit 1

Credit 4 Regional Priority: Specific Credit 1

Total Possible Points: 110

Innovation

LEED Accredited Professional

Certified 40 to 49 points Silver 50 to 59 points Gold 60 to 79 points Platinum 80 to 110

Materials and ResourcesStorage and Collection of Recyclables

Construction and Demolition Waste Management Planning

Construction and Demolition Waste Management

Minimum Indoor Air Quality Performance

Environmental Tobacco Smoke Control

Interior Lighting

Daylight

Quality Views

Acoustic Performance

Indoor Air Quality Assessment

Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Environmental Product Declarations

Thermal Comfort

Building Life-Cycle Impact Reduction

Enhanced Indoor Air Quality Strategies

Low-Emitting Materials

Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Sourcing of Raw Materials

LEED v4 for BD+C: Warehouses and Distribution CentersProject Checklist

Y ? N

Credi 1 1

Possible Points: 16Credit 1 16

Credit 2 1

Credit 3 2

Credit 4 5

Credit 5 5

Credit 6 1

Credit 7 1

Credit 8 Green Vehicles 1

Possible Points: 10Y Prereq 1 Required

Credit 1 1

Credit 2 2

Credit 3 1

Credit 4 3

Credit 5 2

Credit 6 1

Possible Points: 11Y Prereq 1 Required

Y Prereq 2 Required

Y Prereq 3 Building-Level Water Metering Required

Credit 1 2

Credit 2 6

Credit 3 2

Credit 4 Water Metering 1

Possible Points: 33Y Prereq 1 Required

Y Prereq 2 Required

Y Prereq 3 Required

Y Prereq 4 Required

Credit 1 6

Credit 2 18

Credit 3 1

Credit 4 2

Credit 5 3

Credit 6 1

Credit 7 2

Energy and Atmosphere

Optimize Energy Performance

Advanced Energy Metering

Green Power and Carbon Offsets

Minimum Energy Performance

Enhanced Commissioning

Site Development--Protect or Restore Habitat

Open Space

Rainwater Management

Water Efficiency

Indoor Water Use Reduction

Fundamental Refrigerant Management

High Priority Site

Bicycle Facilities

Indoor Water Use Reduction

Outdoor Water Use Reduction

Light Pollution Reduction

Outdoor Water Use Reduction

Reduced Parking Footprint

Construction Activity Pollution Prevention

LEED for Neighborhood Development Location

Site Assessment

Sustainable Sites

Sensitive Land Protection

Renewable Energy Production

Building-Level Energy Metering

Enhanced Refrigerant Management

Demand Response

Project Name

Date

Integrative Process

Location and Transportation

Fundamental Commissioning and Verification

Heat Island Reduction

Surrounding Density and Diverse Uses

Access to Quality Transit

Cooling Tower Water Use

Possible Points: 13Y Prereq 1 Required

Y Prereq 2 Required

Credit 1 5

Credit 2 2

Credit 3 2

Credit 4 Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Material Ingredients 2

Credit 5 2

Indoor Environmental Quality Possible Points: 16Y Prereq 1 Required

Y Prereq 2 Required

Credit 1 2

Credit 2 3

Credit 3 Construction Indoor Air Quality Management Plan 1

Credit 4 2

Credit 5 1

Credit 6 2

Credit 7 3

Credit 8 1

Credit 9 1

Innovation Possible Points: 6Credit 1 5

Credit 2 1

Regional Priority Possible Points: 4Credit 1 Regional Priority: Specific Credit 1

Credit 2 Regional Priority: Specific Credit 1

Credit 3 Regional Priority: Specific Credit 1

Credit 4 Regional Priority: Specific Credit 1

Total Possible Points: 110Certified 40 to 49 points Silver 50 to 59 points Gold 60 to 79 points Platinum 80 to 110

Construction and Demolition Waste Management

Minimum Indoor Air Quality Performance

Environmental Tobacco Smoke Control

Enhanced Indoor Air Quality Strategies

LEED Accredited Professional

Quality Views

Acoustic Performance

Interior Lighting

Innovation

Materials and Resources

Construction and Demolition Waste Management Planning

Building Life-Cycle Impact Reduction

Storage and Collection of Recyclables

Low-Emitting Materials

Thermal Comfort

Daylight

Indoor Air Quality Assessment

Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Sourcing of Raw Materials

Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Environmental Product Declarations

LEED v4 for BD+C: Hospitality Project Checklist

Y ? N

Credi 1 1

Possible Points: 16Credit 1 16

Credit 2 1

Credit 3 2

Credit 4 5

Credit 5 5

Credit 6 1

Credit 7 1

Credit 8 Green Vehicles 1

Possible Points: 10Y Prereq 1 Required

Credit 1 1

Credit 2 2

Credit 3 1

Credit 4 3

Credit 5 2

Credit 6 1

Possible Points: 11Y Prereq 1 Required

Y Prereq 2 Required

Y Prereq 3 Building-Level Water Metering Required

Credit 1 2

Credit 2 6

Credit 3 2

Credit 4 Water Metering 1

Possible Points: 33Y Prereq 1 Required

Y Prereq 2 Required

Y Prereq 3 Required

Y Prereq 4 Required

Credit 1 6

Credit 2 18

Credit 3 1

Credit 4 2

Credit 5 3

Credit 6 1

Credit 7 2

Indoor Water Use Reduction

Energy and Atmosphere

Enhanced Commissioning

Optimize Energy Performance

Cooling Tower Water Use

Building-Level Energy Metering

Fundamental Refrigerant Management

Integrative Process

Location and Transportation

Sensitive Land Protection

High Priority Site

Sustainable Sites

Site Development--Protect or Restore Habitat

LEED for Neighborhood Development Location

Surrounding Density and Diverse Uses

Access to Quality Transit

Bicycle Facilities

Heat Island Reduction

Light Pollution Reduction

Advanced Energy Metering

Demand Response

Renewable Energy Production

Outdoor Water Use Reduction

Fundamental Commissioning and Verification

Indoor Water Use Reduction

Green Power and Carbon Offsets

Reduced Parking Footprint

Construction Activity Pollution Prevention

Site Assessment

Rainwater Management

Open Space

Water Efficiency

Minimum Energy Performance

Outdoor Water Use Reduction

Project Name

Date

Enhanced Refrigerant Management

Possible Points: 13Y Prereq 1 Required

Y Prereq 2 Required

Credit 1 5

Credit 2 2

Credit 3 2

Credit 4 Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Material Ingredients 2

Credit 5 2

Indoor Environmental Quality Possible Points: 16Y Prereq 1 Required

Y Prereq 2 Required

Credit 1 2

Credit 2 3

Credit 3 Construction Indoor Air Quality Management Plan 1

Credit 4 2

Credit 5 1

Credit 6 2

Credit 7 3

Credit 8 1

Credit 9 1

Innovation Possible Points: 6Credit 1 5

Credit 2 1

Regional Priority Possible Points: 4Credit 1 Regional Priority: Specific Credit 1

Credit 2 Regional Priority: Specific Credit 1

Credit 3 Regional Priority: Specific Credit 1

Credit 4 Regional Priority: Specific Credit 1

Total Possible Points: 110Certified 40 to 49 points Silver 50 to 59 points Gold 60 to 79 points Platinum 80 to 110

Storage and Collection of Recyclables

Construction and Demolition Waste Management Planning

Construction and Demolition Waste Management

Minimum Indoor Air Quality Performance

Environmental Tobacco Smoke Control

Daylight

Quality Views

Acoustic Performance

Innovation

Materials and Resources

LEED Accredited Professional

Thermal Comfort

Interior Lighting

Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Sourcing of Raw Materials

Enhanced Indoor Air Quality Strategies

Low-Emitting Materials

Indoor Air Quality Assessment

Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Environmental Product Declarations

Building Life-Cycle Impact Reduction

LEED v4 for BD+C: HealthcareProject Checklist

Y ? N

Y Prereq 1 Required

Credit 1 1

Possible Points: 9Credit 1 9

Credit 2 1

Credit 3 2

Credit 4 1

Credit 5 2

Credit 6 1

Credit 7 1

Credit 8 Green Vehicles 1

Possible Points: 9Y Prereq 1 Required

Y Prereq 2 Required

Credit 1 1

Credit 2 1

Credit 3 1

Credit 4 2

Credit 5 1

Credit 6 1

Credit 7 1

Credit 8 Direct Exterior Access 1

Possible Points: 11Y Prereq 1 Required

Y Prereq 2 Required

Y Prereq 3 Building-Level Water Metering Required

Credit 1 1

Credit 2 7

Credit 3 2

Credit 4 Water Metering 1

Energy and Atmosphere Possible Points: 35Y Prereq 1 Required

Y Prereq 2 Required

Y Prereq 3 Required

Y Prereq 4 Required

Credit 1 6

Credit 2 20

Credit 3 1

Outdoor Water Use Reduction

Indoor Water Use Reduction

Places of Respite

Indoor Water Use Reduction

Minimum Energy Performance

Cooling Tower Water Use

Light Pollution Reduction

Water Efficiency

Sensitive Land Protection

Construction Activity Pollution Prevention

Sustainable Sites

Site Assessment

Rainwater Management

Heat Island Reduction

Location and Transportation

Surrounding Density and Diverse Uses

LEED for Neighborhood Development Location

High Priority Site

Environmental Site Assessment

Fundamental Commissioning and Verification

Advanced Energy Metering

Outdoor Water Use Reduction

Project Name

Date

Integrative Process

Reduced Parking Footprint

Building-Level Energy Metering

Fundamental Refrigerant Management

Site Development--Protect or Restore Habitat

Integrative Project Planning and Design

Access to Quality Transit

Bicycle Facilities

Enhanced Commissioning

Optimize Energy Performance

Open Space

Credit 4 2

Credit 5 3

Credit 6 1

Credit 7 2

Possible Points: 19Y Prereq 1 Required

Y Prereq 2 Required

Y Prereq 3 Required

Credit 1 5

Credit 2 2

Credit 3 2

Credit 4 Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Material Ingredients 2

Credit 5 1

Credit 6 2

Credit 7 2

Credit 8 1

Credit 9 2

Indoor Environmental Quality Possible Points: 16Y Prereq 1 Required

Y Prereq 2 Required

Credit 1 2

Credit 2 3

Credit 3 Construction Indoor Air Quality Management Plan 1

Credit 4 2

Credit 5 1

Credit 6 1

Credit 7 2

Credit 8 2

Credit 9 2

Innovation Possible Points: 6Credit 1 5

Credit 2 1

Regional Priority Possible Points: 4Credit 1 Regional Priority: Specific Credit 1

Credit 2 Regional Priority: Specific Credit 1

Credit 3 Regional Priority: Specific Credit 1

Credit 4 Regional Priority: Specific Credit 1

Total Possible Points: 110

Materials and Resources

Demand Response

Building Life-Cycle Impact Reduction

Daylight

Environmental Tobacco Smoke Control

Low-Emitting Materials

Indoor Air Quality Assessment

Minimum Indoor Air Quality Performance

Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Environmental Product Declarations

PBT Source Reduction- Mercury

Enhanced Refrigerant Management

Construction and Demolition Waste Management

Storage and Collection of Recyclables

Renewable Energy Production

Construction and Demolition Waste Management Planning

Furniture and Medical Furnishings

Enhanced Indoor Air Quality Strategies

Green Power and Carbon Offsets

PBT Source Reduction- Mercury

Certified 40 to 49 points Silver 50 to 59 points Gold 60 to 79 points Platinum 80 to 110

Building Product Disclosure and Optimization - Sourcing of Raw Materials

Innovation

LEED Accredited Professional

Quality Views

Design for Flexibility

Acoustic Performance

PBT Source Reduction- Lead, Cadmium, and Copper

Thermal Comfort

Interior Lighting