University-21 paradoxes Higher Education India

www.universityͲ21.com 1

PARADOXES OF HIGHER EDUCATION SURVEY


� INDIA ECONOMY� CORRELATIONS TO GDP

� EDUCATION� COMPETITIVENESS� INNOVATION

� PARADOXES SURVEY� CHALLENGES

� DEMOGRAPHIC DIVIDEND� HIGHER EDUCATION ENROLMENT� 21ST CENTURY EDUCATION

� IDEAS� BLENDED EDUCATIONͲ SCALE� SOCIAL INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURIAL EDUCATIONͲ21ST CENTURY� MANAGEMENT

� UNIVERSITY-21

HIGHER EDUCATION LANDSCAPE

www.universityͲ21.com

CONTEXT: GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS AND GDP

4

9Rankings on the ease of doing business 134/189 9Rankings on Starting a new business rank 166/1839Global Competitiveness Index 2011-2012 ranking 60/1449GII 66/144

9India䇻s population is 1.2 Billion99GDP is $ 1.8 Trillion9GDP per capita is $14009GDP per capita (PPP Adjusted) is $38009400 Million people live below $2 a day

www.universityͲ21.com5

Innovation�and�patent�landscape


1. MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN THE HIGHER EDUCATIONALINSTITUTIONS AND UNIVERSITIES:

Over the past decade, a team from Harvard Business School, London School ofEconomics, McKinsey & Company, and Stanford has systematically surveyed globalmanagement. They measured management practices across operational management,monitoring, targets, and people management and generated an overall management score,surveying over 10,000 firms including educational institutions and in 20 countriesincluding India. This research created the first global database of management practices.

GDP and management scores have positivecorrelationi.

i https://www.google.co.in/#q=nick+bloom+stanford+PPT+GDP+relation+to+management


SURVEY OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY

7

• The Objective of the survey was to understand the impediments for growth of universities and higher educational institutions and to understand if there is real need for management consultants like University-21.

• The representative sample composition of universities and institutes:• Central, state, private and deemed Universities.• All twenty-nine states and union territories were covered.• Engineering colleges with enrolment level more than 1000 students.• Management colleges with enrolment level more than 100 students.• We randomly selected sample universities/institutions and sent online

‘Paradoxes of Higher Education’ survey link along with a cover letter with one week deadline.

• 67 out of 150 universities and colleges responded from 24 states.


24/29 STATES REPRESENTED BY 67 UNIVERSITIES AND HIGHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

8

METHODOLOGY


SURVEY QUESTIONER

9

Q1. What is the size of your institute/university?Q2. By what percentage do you expect student enrolment to grow in your institute/university in the coming academic year?Q3. Do you believe that having students and faculty exchange program with reputed foreign universities can become a game changer and improve ranking of your institute/university?Q4. Do you believe that your faculty and staff are engaged and motivated up to yourexpectations?Q5. Overall, I am very satisfied with the way my institute performed (is performing) currently.Q6. What percentage of your students got placed last year before passing out from your institute/university?Q7. What are the top three pain points that your institute is facing?Q8. What is your current annual revenue?Q9. What's holding you back from reaching your growth aspirations?Q10. Are you ready to invest in a consulting program that will help you improve enrolment, placement and ROI on a predictable and consistent basis?


42%

16%

17%

11%

2%

13%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%

Less than 1,000 students

1,000 Ͳ 1,999 Students

2,000 Ͳ 3,999 students

4,000 Ͳ 6,999 students

7,000 Ͳ 10,000 students

More than 10,000 students

RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE

SIZE

OF UNIVER

SITY

/INSTITUTE


33%

33%

13%

6%

6%

9%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%

Less than 10%

10Ͳ20%

20Ͳ30%

30Ͳ50%

50Ͳ70%

Above 70%


YOY EN

ROLM

ENT GR

OWTH

RAT

E


9%

2%

17%

25%

48%

1. Strongly Disagree

2. Disagree

3. Neither Agree nor Disagree

4. Agree

5. Strongly Agree

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% FACU

LTY , S

TUDEN

T EXC

HANGE P

ROGR

AM



5%

11%

32%

38%

14%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%


2. Disagree


4. Agree

5. Strongly Agree


FACU

LTY EN

GAG

EMEN

T LEV

EL


OVERALL PERFORMANCE SATISFACTION SCORE

14

8%

13%

25%

38%

17%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%


2. Disagree


4. Agree

5. Strongly Agree


PER

FOR

MA

NC

E S

ATIS

FAC

TIO

N

SCO

RE


PAIN POINTS AND HOLD BACK

15


11%

11%

8%

6%

25%

38%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40%

Do not know

10Ͳ20%

20Ͳ30%

30Ͳ50%

50Ͳ75%

Above 75%


PLAC

EMEN

T


1. Our�present�students�enrolment�ratio�in�higher�education�is�just�about�18�percent�targeted�to�increase�that�figure�to�30%,�requiring�another�800�universities�and�40,000�colleges�in�the�next�10�years.�Basically�huge�demand�exists.�But,�42%�of�the�institutes�have�enrolment�less�then�1000�and�another�16%�have�below�2000.�Also�66%�institutes�expect�enrolment�growth�less�than�20%.�Clear�DemandͲSupply�Disequilibrium.

Conclusion:�Institutes�need�to�rethink�their�growth�strategy.2. National�employability�test,�industry,�NASSCOM�have�repeatedly�echoed�that�only�20Ͳ

25%�of�the�graduating�students�are�employable,�the�placement�are�below�satisfactory�levels,�yet�the�heads�of�institutions�seem�to�be�satisfied�with�their�performances?

Conclusion:�There�is�clear�need�for�improved�industry�academia�interaction�and�the��need�to�have�performance�management.3. 100%�respondents�said�that�they�Lack�Quality�Faculty,�they�echo�that�faculty�capability�

improvement�is�their�number�one�pain�point,�yet�the�respondents�write�that�they�are�satisfied�with�faculty�engagement.

Conclusion:�Serious�need�to�assess�relationship�between�21st century�skills�needed�in�he�classroom,�student�aspirations,�quality�of�leadership�bandwidth,�understanding�of�the�shared�vision�by�entire�faculty�and�administrative�staff�at�the�institutes

TAKE�AWAY

UniversityͲ21�team��can�work�with�your�team�to�see�opportunities�which�others�miss.


PEOPLE AT UNIVERSITY-21

18

Harjiv Singh,�Founder�&�CEO�SalwanMedia,�Gutenberg�Communications,

BrainGain Magazine

Dr.�Sethuraman (Panch),�Panchanathan,

Senior�Vice�President,Arizona�State�University

Prof.Fernando Reimers,�Harvard�University

Mahendra�BapnaHarvard�Advanced�Leadership�Fellow,

Former�CEO�of�Tata�Enterprises

Hon.�Jerry�MacArthur�Hultin,�Senior�Presidential�Fellow,�New�York�University


VISION

UNIVERSITY-21 OFFERS VARIETY OF SERVICES TO HIGHER EDUCATION ANDVOCATIONAL EDUCATION INSTITUTES, BOTH PRIVATE AND PUBLIC; IN THE AREAS OFORGANISATIONAL LEADERSHIP AND STRATEGY; FACULTY AND STAFF DEVELOPMENT; MARKETING AND BRANDING; INDUSTRY NETWORK AND PARTNERSHIPSDEVELOPMENT; STUDENT AND ALUMNI AFFAIRS; STUDENT AND FACULTY EXCHANGEPROGRAMS; DUE-DILIGENCE WITH JV PARTNERS; FINANCIAL RESTRUCTURING; ENROLMENT, RETENTION, CURRICULA AND PEDAGOGY DEVELOPMENT; PROCUREMENTAND OUTSOURCING; IT SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT; DEVELOPING INNOVATION ANDEXCELLENCE CENTERS. EACH IS DESIGNED TO IMPROVE OVERALL PERFORMANCE OFOUR CLIENTS.

19

WHAT WE OFFER

TO BE THE MOST TRUSTED AND RESPECTED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRMIN THE HIGHER EDUCATION SECTOR, RECOGNIZED BY OUR CLIENTS ANDCLIENTS CUSTOMERS IN INDIA AND THE MIDDLE EAST FOR DELIVERING

EXCELLENCE.


Thank you

20

University-21 paradoxes Higher Education India

Education

Transcript of University-21 paradoxes Higher Education India