Universal Lecture on the None Academic Use of the Term Circumcision

7/28/2019 Universal Lecture on the None Academic Use of the Term Circumcision

1/4

Responsible for text and layout: Amen Ronald Oberhollenzer, School of Humanity, www.intacthumanity.org

Universal Lecture on the none academic, but rather moronic, pathetic , and always

fundamentally wrong use of the term circumcision when referring to the perverse act of

forced circumcision aka the butchery of cutting the healthy foreskin from a child also known as:

the child abuse in the perverse face of routine circumcision aka: RIC BRIT MILAH SUNNAT.

Healthy Common Sense Knows this without research and without having been told so:

There is a fundamental difference between A and B:between A)the act of medical warranted circumcision

and this barbaric act: B)the act of forced circumcision

Would you say: Intercourse is cruel while referring to rape (forced intercourse)?

Would you say: Say no to intercourse while referring to rape (forced intercourse)?

Would you say: Intercourse is a crime while referring to rape (forced intercourse)?

Would you say: Parents against intercourse while referring to rape (forced intercourse)?Would you say: Doctors oppose intercourse while referring to rape (forced intercourse)?

No, you would certainly not, but you would call it none academic at all, but rather moronic,

pathetic and always fundamentally wrong, if someone would use the term intercourse

when referring to forced intercourse ~ rape!

So, why is it so difficult, to call this child abuse by what it is, namely Forced Circumcision?


2/4

Universal Lecture on the none academic, but rather moronic, pathetic , and always fundamentally

wrong use of the term circumcision when referring to the perverse act of forced circumcision

aka the butchery of cutting the healthy foreskin from a child also known as: the child abuse in the

perverse face of routine circumcision aka: RIC BRIT MILAH SUNNAT.

While rapists obviously deeply mentally and emotionally disturbed people - prefer to call the act of

rape: intercourse; and while those who butcher the childs genital, and those who agree to this

insane act to be done on the child obviously deeply mentally and emotionally disturbed people -

prefer to call this act of child mutilation, this infliction of non-accidental injury on a child, this

obvious child abuse: circumcision; it is clear to the sane heart and mind, or in other words, it is

clear to healthy common sense, that there is a fundamental difference between the act of rape

and the act of intercourse, and that it is therefore moronic pathetic - fundamentally wrong - to

use the term intercourse when referring to the perverse act of rape; just the same as it is

moronic pathetic - fundamentally wrong - to use the term circumcision when referring to the

perverse act of forced circumcision.

Healthy Common Sense Knows this without research and without having been told so:

There is a fundamental differencebetween A)the act of medical warranted circumcision, an actwhich if performed as the law on medical surgery requires - is a lawful act to be performed under

current democratic rule of law, and B)the act of forced circumcision, which is the act of not

medically warranted circumcision on children of any age and gender aka routine child

circumcision also known as routine infant circumcision, and on any adult without this adults

consent, where any of these acts is OUTLAWED under current democratic rule of law, regardless by

who inflicted and regardless for whatever reason.

Yet and even after having repeatedly informed the various intactivist-groups, including the

academics amongst them, about this fundamental difference of both acts, and pointing out, that it is

NOT academic at all, but rather moronic, pathetic and always fundamentally wrong to use the

term circumcision when referring to forced circumcision I still see this blatant ignorance:

Say no to Circumcision instead of: Say no to Forced Circumcision

Circumcision is a crime instead of: Forced Circumcision is a crime

Circumcision is a cruel instead of: Forced Circumcision is a cruel

Doctors opposing Circumcision instead of: Doctors opposing Forced Circumcision

Parents against Circumcision (etc.) instead of: Parents against Forced Circumcision

Would you say: Say no to intercourse while referring to forced intercourse rape)?

Would you say: Doctors oppose intercourse while referring to forced intercourse rape)?

Would you say: Intercourse is a crime while referring to forced intercourse rape)?

Would you say: Parents against intercourse while referring to forced intercourse rape)?

Would you say: Intercourse is cruel while referring to forced intercourse rape)?

No, you would certainly not, but you would call it NOT academic at all, but rather moronic,

pathetic and always fundamentally wrong, if someone would use the term intercourse when

referring to rape forced intercourse!


3/4

So, why is it so difficult for you, to call this child abuse by what it is, namely Forced Circumcision?

If you would have been the victim of forced intercourse rape, you would certainly be INSULTED

by someone saying you are a victim of intercourse.

You would also see it as mildly spoken none academic, yet moronic, pathetic and fundamentally

wrong and as insult, if someone would petition the rapist: please make your informed decision to

whether or not you decide to have forced intercourse.

Just the same, as it is an INSULT to the victim of forced circumcision, if someone says: you are a

victim of circumcision.

Just the same, as it is mildly spoken none academic, yet moronic, pathetic and fundamentally

wrong and insult, if someone petitions those who inflict the child abuse of forced circumcision:

please make your informed decision to whether or not you decide to mutilate the child.

And how would you evaluate the state of mind of the rapist who demands more information,

discussions, scientific research, to be persuaded, to be asked, in order to maybe stop

forcing intercourse?

And how would you evaluate the state of mind of those who act so as if information, discussions,

scientific research, petitions, asking those who force intercourse to please make your informed

decision to whether or not you decide to have forced intercourse, were the appropriate thing to

do, in order to persuade the rapist to maybe stop forcing intercourse?

And how would you evaluate the state of mind of those who force intercourse (the rapists), would

say: Forced intercourse on male children is not outlawed, or God has commanded us to have

forced intercourse with male children, or Only forced intercourse on female humans is outlawed,

but boys are accorded no such legislative (law) protection?

And how would you evaluate the state of mind of those who force circumcision (the genital

mutilators and those who agree this perversity be done to the child), would say: Forced circumcision

on male children is not outlawed, or God has commanded us to force circumcision on male

children, or Only forced circumcision on female humans (FGM is outlawed, but boys are accordedno such legislative (law) protection so as if MGM were not outlawed?

And how would you evaluate the state of mind of those who A) speak and act against this obvious

CHILD ABUSE of force circumcision (intactivists), but B) act so as if MGM were not outlawed, and

circulate this ABSOLUTELY WRONG and therefore MISLEADING INFORMATION: Only forced

circumcision on female humans (FGM is outlawed, but boys are accorded no such legislative (law)

protection?

Would you then not come to the conclusion that only the seriously disturbed mind is able to speak

and act this way?


4/4

Is it not normal behavior of heal

differentiate between the lawf

forced circumcision, and to use

and this without requirement of

And is it not normal behavior of

able to react against this daily a

accordingly, which means: imm

discussion, beyond research

wasting time?

Well, if you find these question

and if not you may find tha

Always remember: A = A; A = alany form of medically warrant

any form of forced circumcisio

b.t.w.: It is not required to be a

academic who doesnt.

Jerusalem, 14th

June 2013

Amen Ronald Oberhollenzer-Pa

School of Humanity

Intact Humanity.org

Global Symposium for an Intact

www.intacthumanity.org

[email protected]

hy common sense people, of the clear mind an

l act of medically warranted circumcision and

the correct terminology when referring to the o

having to be told?

healthy common sense people, of the clear min

d globally perpetrated child abuse, this national

diately, directly, decisively, on the base of existi

beyond asking (petition), beyond compromi

easily answered, you know what to do.

t reading the lecture again, helps a lot.

ays A; A is never B; only B = B 1 + 1 = 2 and circumcision is legal ~ circumcision is not a

is outlawed ~ ________________________

academic, in order to understand all this, but

ernoster

Humanity

heart, to be able to

the outlawed act of

ne or the other

and heart, to be

and global crime

g law, beyond

se, thus: beyond

d never 3;crime;

___;

shame on the

Universal Lecture on the None Academic Use of the Term Circumcision

Documents

Transcript of Universal Lecture on the None Academic Use of the Term Circumcision