UNITED STATES ARMY

Army Fiscal Programming For Equipment Organizations / Processes / Challenges & Priorities

COL Frank M. Muth

Director of Materiel, Force Development, Army G-8

2

FOUO Agenda Agenda

• Organizations

• Processes

• Challenges

• Priorities

• Challenges

Force Development Directorate

Director

BG Dyess

Director of Materiel

COL Muth

Director of Resources

Mr. Francis (Acting)

Director of Joint & Integration

BG Ferrari

Assistant Deputy

COL Perry

FA 50

LTC Rivers

• Equipment

Distribution

Plans

• Equipment

Modernization

• Equipment

Programming

• Unit Set Fielding

• Integration of Distribution

Plans

• Modular Force Integration

• Reserve Component Pay-

Back Plans

• Army Equipping Strategy

• Management of Programming

for Equipping Program

Evaluation Group

• War-fighting Analysis for

equipping and modernization

• Synchronize munitions

funding

requirements

• Army BCT Modernization

Planning

• Monitor Technical

Integration and

Test and Evaluation

• JROC, AMCB, ACR,

CDRT oversight

•Understanding the physical realities that we are facing now and into the future!

$$$$$$$$$$ BUDGET $$$$$$$$$$

RESOURCING/PROGRAMMING

• Equipping: Turning materiel requirements into programs… developing

distribution plans… developing modernization strategies…

Created 1984 within G-3 Authorized / Assigned Strength

Military 107 / 109 Civilian 177 / 155

Contractors 140 / 143

3

Organization - DOM Divisions

4

Equipping: Our seven DOM Division Chiefs

manage ten Equipping Portfolios

Programming: Understanding the process

Office Name Capability Portfolio Key Capability Areas TRADOC Alignment

G-8

FDB

Full Dimension

Protection

• Protection

• NBC

• Engineers

• Military Police

Maneuver Support Center of

Excellence (CoE)

Fort Leonard Wood, MS

G-8

FDC

Mission

Command • Mission Command

• Signal

• Logistics Automation

• Tactical Power Generation

Mission Command CoE

Fort Gordon, GA

G-8

FDD

Soldier &

Maneuver

• Movement & Maneuver (Soldier)

• Movement & Maneuver (Ground)

• Armor

• Infantry

• Soldier

Maneuver CoE

Fort Benning, GA

G-8

FDG Fires

• Fires (Indirect)

• Protection (AMD)

• Air Defense

• Field Artillery

Fires CoE

Fort Sill, OK

G-8

FDI Intelligence • Intelligence

• Intelligence, Surveillance,

Reconnaissance

U.S. Army Intelligence School

Fort Huachuca, AZ

G-8

FDL Logistics

• Sustainment

• Sustainment (Transportation)

• Combat Service Support -

Transportation

• Combat Service Support – Log

Enablers

Sustainment CoE

Fort Lee, VA

G-8

FDV Aviation • Movement & Maneuver (Air)

• Rotary Wing

• Fixed Wing

• Unmanned Aerial Systems

Aviation CoE

Fort Rucker, AL

$135.3 $134.6 $134.3 $134.7 $135.5 $138.0

$133.5 $133.8 $134.9

$137.1

$139.7

$147.1 $148.8

$150.0

$153.0 $153.5

$120

$125

$130

$135

$140

$145

$150

$155

$160

FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

PB13 OSD Fiscal Guidance Critical Rqmts

Army Fiscal Outlook

FY12

Enacted

FY13

Requested

The Army program must continue to adapt to the changing global security

environment and economic conditions or risk the loss of additional resources

Critical requirement: Minimum level of resources

necessary to accomplish a program’s critical

mission/task

Assume reduced OCO for 2-3 years

after Afghanistan (FY14) for Army Reset OCO

$67.7B

OCO

$50.1B

$2.4 - $3.4B/year

remaining in “must

fund” bills &

compelling

requirements

POM Program Objective

Memorandum

6

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

2012

2013

2014

2015

6: National

Elections

20:

Presidential

Inauguration

Potential New Administration Transition

15-19 Program

Budget Review

Build POM 15-19

14-18 Program

Budget Review

16-20 Program

Budget Review

Build POM 16-20

Build POM 14-18

4: National

Elections

Build POM 17-21 17-21 Program

Budget Review

DPG 15-19

DPG 16-20

DPG 17-21

DPG 14-18

CRA

Program Review Issue Teams

Program Review Issue Teams

Program Review Issue Teams

Program Review Issue Teams

DoD POM Process

DoD POM Process drives the Army POM Process

Weapons

System

Review

Directors

Reviews

Two

Star Reviews PPBC SRG MTOEs

& TDAs

Rqmts

HQDA

Capabilities

Needs

Analysis

G-3 FM

TRADOC

EE PEG EE PEG

Requirements

Identification

Rqmts

Validation/Prioritization & Funding

Solutions

Rqmts

& Funding

Solutions

Rqmts

& Funding

Solution

Approval

PMs & PEOs

Army Equipping PEG POM Process

•PPBC: Planning Programming Budgeting Council

•PEG: Program Execution Group

•SRG: Senior Review Group

Recommendations Decisions Inputs

Guidance & Decisions

EE PEG Process: Deliberate & Transparent 7

Nov Jun Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May 29 Jul

• Currently – like the Chevy Suburban

– We are large, cumbersome, and have a difficult time maneuvering

in tight places

– extremely expensive

– overloaded with technology that is difficult and costly to maintain.

– Tremendous energy (fuel) requirement

• Future – like the Chevy Equinox

– Smaller and more agile

– Much less expensive

– Keep only the most needed capabilities based on a narrower

mission set

– Lower energy requirement How Do You Modernize

In This Environment?

Equipping Challenges

8

FY12

• Network

– Broadband capability to the commanders on the move and to the Soldier

• Combat Vehicle Portfolio

• Transform

• Replace

• Improve

• Aviation

– Highest demand capability

– Expanding requirements (13th CAB)

• Light Tactical Vehicle Modernization (JLTV)

• Soldier Modernization

Equipment Modernization Priorities

Priorities for FY13 and beyond…..

Transform Bradley IFV to GCV (Ground Combat Vehicle)

Replace M113 with the AMPV (Armored Multi-Purpose

Vehicle)

Improve the M1 and Stryker

GCV – IFV M113 FOV

AMPV AH-64 D II/III Longbow

CH-47F

UH-60M

9

M2A3 IFV

Programs, Resources, Equipping in Today’s Fiscally

Restrained Environment – trades in Risk, Capabilities,

and Requirements

Thoughts for Discussion

• Network Integration Evaluation (NIE)

• Capability Sets

• Technology (Faster, cheaper, lighter, requires less power)

• When do we integrate (as technology emerges)

• Can we afford it?

• Aim Point (i.e. choose technology at the right point; sometimes

is not the best point)

Conclusion

Programmatics

Where is our Aim Point???

12

Our Nation and Our Soldiers

Deserve the BEST ARMY

Questions

13